Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2021 Apr 27;52(3):1257–1269. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00503-5

Production strategies and biotechnological relevance of microbial lipases: a review

Adegoke Isiaka Adetunji 1,, Ademola Olufolahan Olaniran 1
PMCID: PMC8324693  PMID: 33904151

Abstract

Lipases are enzymes that catalyze the breakdown of lipids into long-chain fatty acids and glycerol in oil-water interface. In addition, they catalyze broad spectrum of bioconversion reactions including esterification, inter-esterification, among others in non-aqueous and micro-aqueous milieu. Lipases are universally produced from plants, animals, and microorganisms. However, lipases from microbial origin are mostly preferred owing to their lower production costs, ease of genetic manipulation etc. The secretion of these biocatalysts by microorganisms is influenced by nutritional and physicochemical parameters. Optimization of the bioprocess parameters enhanced lipase production. In addition, microbial lipases have gained intensified attention for a wide range of applications in food, detergent, and cosmetics industries as well as in environmental bioremediation. This review provides insights into strategies for production of microbial lipases for potential biotechnological applications.

Keywords: Lipases, Microorganisms, Microbial lipases, Bioprocess parameters, Biotechnological applications

Introduction

Lipases (triacylglycerol acylhydrolases, EC 3.1.1.3) are a class of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of triglycerides into diglycerides, monoglycerides, glycerol, and free fatty acids at the organic-aqueous interface [1]. In addition, they catalyze a plethora of reactions including esterification, inter-esterification, trans-esterification, alcoholysis, acidolysis, and aminolysis in non-aqueous and micro-aqueous milieu [2]. Lipases represent the third most commercialized enzymes, after proteases and carbohydrases, and account for more than one-fifth of the global enzyme market [3, 4]. They are commonly secreted from plants, animals, and microorganisms [1]. However, microbial lipases represent the most widely used class of enzymes in biotechnology owing to their stability at broad ranges of temperature and pH, substrate specificity, high yields, lower production costs, and ease of genetic manipulation [5]. In addition, the microorganisms can be cultivated in huge amounts in a relatively short time by an established fermentation process for mass production of the enzyme.

Microbial lipases are serine hydrolases and their activities rely on a catalytic triad, comprising of Ser-Asp/Glu-His with a consensus sequence (Gly-x-Ser-x-Gly) [6, 7]. The three-dimensional structure of lipases reveals the characteristic α/β hydrolase fold [8]. The active site of the α/β hydrolase fold enzymes consists of three catalytic residues namely, nucleophilic residue, catalytic acid residue, and histidine residue [9]. Furthermore, microbial lipases exhibit chemo-specificity, regio-selectivity, and enantio-selectivity toward substrates [10]. They are employed for a variety of biotechnological applications in biodiesel, food, nutraceutical, detergent, bioremediation, agriculture, cosmetics, leather, and paper industries [11]. Therefore, the present review discusses on the techniques for detection of lipase production from a diversity of microorganisms. It further reveals bioprocess parameters influencing microbial lipase production coupled with strategies for optimization of the biocatalysts for industrial and environmental applications.

Lipase-producing microorganisms

Many microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, yeasts, and actinomycetes produce lipases [12]. Among bacteria, lipase production has been reported from members of the genera Acinetobacter [13], Bacillus [14], Burkholderia [15], Pseudomonas [16], Staphylococcus [17], Microbacterium [18], Lactobacillus [19], Serratia [20], Aeromonas [21], Arthrobacter [22], Stenotrophomonas [23], and Thermosyntropha [24] etc. However, genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas are recognized as the most prominent lipase producers [5]. In addition, lipase secretion from fungal and yeast strains has been extensively studied in the last decades. Among fungi, lipases from Aspergillus, Mucor, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Fusarium, and Geotrichum, have been reported [2530]. Yeasts including members of the general Candida, Cryptococcus, Trichosporon, Aureobasidium, and Rhodotorula have been adequately investigated for their lipase-producing potentials [3135]. These lipase-producing microorganisms are domiciled in different habitats including industrial wastes, vegetable oil mill effluent, dairy effluent, oil-contaminated sites, decaying foods, hot spring etc. [3638]. A list of lipase-producing microorganisms and their sources of isolation is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Some lipase-producing microorganisms and their sources

Microorganism Source of isolation Reference
Bacteria

Bacillus sp.

Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB

Oil-contaminated soil

Lipid-rich wastewater from edible oil mill industry in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

[39]

[14]

Bacillus coagulans Soil from olive oil processing factory [40]
Bacillus sp. L2 Hot spring, Perak, Malaysia [41]
Bacillus sp. FH5 Tannery waste [42]
Bacillus coagulans BTS-3 Kitchen waste [43]
Bacillus thermoleovorans CCR11 “El Carrizal” hot springs, Veracruz, Mexico [44]
Bacillus pumilus RK31 Oil-contaminated soil [45]
Acinetobacter sp. AU07 Distillery unit [13]
Acinetobacter sp. Oil-contaminated soil, South Korea [46]
Acinetobacter haemolyticus TA 106 Human skin [47]
Acinetobacter haemolyticus NSO2-30 Olive pomace-soil mixture [48]
Enterobacter aerogenes IABR-0785 Soil of IIT, Kharagpur [49]
Burkholderia sp. HL-10 Lipid-contaminated soil [15]
Geobacillus thermoleovorans YN Desert soil sample [50]
Geobacillus sp. ARM Oil-contaminated soil, Selangor, Malaysia [51]
Geobacillus zalihae Palm oil effluent, Semenyih, Malaysia [52]
Pseudomonas sp. BUP6 Rumen of Malabari goat [16]
Pseudomonas fluorescens RB02-3 Pasteurized and raw milk [53]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa KM110 Oil processing plant wastewater, Tehran, Iran [54]
Microbacterium sp. Pulp and paper mill effluent [18]
Staphylococcus aureus NK-LB37 Oil-contaminated soil, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu [17]
Lactobacillus plantarum DSMZ 12028 Dry fermented sausage [19]
Aeromonas sp. S1 Soil and sludge in oil and grease chamber of dairy industry, New Delhi, India [21]
Arthrobacter sp. BGCC#490 Oil-contaminated soil of automobile garage [22]
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Soil sample [23]
Thermomyces lanuginosus Zoo waste and bird nest materials [55]
Fungi
Aspergillus niger DAOM Dairy effluent [29]
Aspergillus tamarii JGIF06 Rhizospheric soil, Bangalore, India [56]
Aspergillus terreus NCFT 4269.10 - [57]
Trametes hirsuta Chicken slaughterhouse effluent [58]
Hypocrea pseudokoningii Soil samples [59]
Geotrichum candidum Soil sample [28]
Fusarium sp. (Gibberella fujikuroi complex) Decay plant matter in the Atlantic forest, São Paulo, Brazil [27]
Penicillium sp. section Gracilenta CBMAI 1583 Atlantic rainforest soil [30]
Mucor geophillus Soil sample [26]
Rhizopus chinensis CCTCC M201021 Da Qu (Traditional leaven for production of Chinese liquor) [25]
Yeast
Candida viswanathii [60]
Candida gulliermondi Leaves of castor bean plant [34]
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa MTCC 8737 Marine soil sample, Mangalore, India [32]
Aureobasidium pullulans HN2.3 Sea saltern, Qingdao [31]
Cryptococcus sp. MTCC 5455 Air [35]
Trichosporon coremiiforme Traditional tannery, Fez, Morocco [33]

Methods for detection of microbial lipase production

Several techniques have been developed for the screening of microorganisms for lipase production. These methods either involve the use of microbial strains under study or measurement of lipase activity from crude or purified enzyme [61, 62]. Numerous approaches employed for detection of microbial lipase production or measuring lipolytic activity are discussed in details below:

Qualitative screening of microorganisms on selective growth media

In this technique, lipolysis is detected by changes in the appearance of the substrates (such as tributyrin and triolein) that are emulsified in the growth media [63]. The formation of clear halos around the colonies cultivated on the agar plate is an indication of lipase production [64]. Pseudomonas fluorescens RB02-3 and Acinetobacter haemolyticus NS02-30 were screened for lipolytic activity on tributyrin agar [48, 53]. Lipolytic Bacillus sp. LBN 4 was isolated on tributyrin agar medium using glycerol tributyrate as substrate [65]. Lipase production by Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB was detected on Tween-20 agar plate as visible precipitates of calcium salts around the agar wells, resulting from formation of fatty acid from lipid hydrolysis [14]. In addition, solid media supplemented with dyes such as phenol red, Victoria Blue B, Spirit blue, or Nile blue sulfate as pH indicators are also used for determination of lipolytic activity. The drop in pH due to the release of fatty acid is indicated by a change in the color of the indicators. Phenol red agar, consisting of phenol red dye (0.01%, w/v), olive oil (0.1%, v/v), CaCl2 (0.1%, w/v), and Agar (2%, w/v), has been used for screening of Bacillus strain [39]. Geobacillus zalihae sp. nov. was screened for lipolytic activity using triolein agar plate, comprising of triolein (0.25%, v/v), agar (1%, w/v), nutrient broth (0.8%, w/v), and Victoria Blue (0.01%, w/v) [52]. Furthermore, fluorescent dye Rhodomine B is also employed for the detection of lipolytic organisms in plate assay containing emulsified olive oil as substrate. The formation of orange fluorescent halos around colonies under ultraviolet irradiation suggests production of lipase [66]. Castro-Ochoa et al. [44] screened Bacillus thermoleovorans CCR11 for lipolytic activity on Rhodomine B agar consisting of Rhodomine B (0.001%, w/v), nutrient broth (0.8%, w/v), NaCl (0.4%, w/v), olive oil (3%, v/v), and agar (1%, w/v). Spirit blue agar medium has also been used for the detection of lipolytic activity of Serratia rubidaea and Acinetobacter sp. [46, 67]. This chromogenic method is simple and rapid. However, acidification of the medium resulting from the production of free fatty acids from microbial lipases gives false results [63].

Quantitative titrimetric assay

Lipase activity is measured quantitatively on a continuously stirred triacylglyceride emulsion by neutralization of free fatty acids released following addition of titrated NaOH (in order to maintain the pH at a constant end point value) [10, 63]. Several authors have reported the use of olive oil as a substrate for the titrimetric analysis [68]. Rasmey et al. [69] measured the lipolytic activity of Pseudomonas monteilli 2403-KY120354 in a reaction mixture containing olive oil emulsion incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Enzyme activity was terminated after addition of 20 mL acetone: ethanol mixture (1:1). The liberated free fatty acids were titrated against 0.1 M NaOH using phenolphthalein. One unit of lipase was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol/min of fatty acids under standard assay conditions.

Microbial lipase production

Microbial lipases are mostly extracellular in nature and are secreted in growth medium following utilization of the medium components by lipolytic microorganisms in the presence suitable inducer substrates under optimal fermentation conditions [14]. However, the synthesis of these biocatalysts varies based on appropriate selection of microbial strains, substrate type, and fermentation technology [6]. Microbial lipase production varies from a few hours to a few days during late exponential or stationary growth phase [36, 70, 71]. The production of these biocatalysts occurs by submerged or solid state fermentation in a batch, repeated-batch, fed-batch, or continuous system [71]. However, submerged fermentation involving cultivation of microorganisms as a suspension in nutrient enriched broth is mostly preferred due to easily engineered process control and colossal amounts of extracellular enzyme released in the growth medium [72]. In addition, submerged fermentation permits higher homogeneity of the culture medium, easier lipase recovery from the fermentation medium, and eliminates production of undesirable metabolites [12, 14]. About 90% of industrial biocatalysts are produced by submerged fermentation [6].

Influence of bioprocess parameters on microbial lipase production

Lipase production is greatly influenced by carbon and nitrogen sources, temperature, pH, presence of lipids, inorganic salts, dissolved oxygen concentration, incubation period, agitation speed etc. [12, 38, 72]. The various nutritional and physicochemical parameters affecting microbial lipase production are illustrated in Fig. 1 and discussed in details below:

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram depicting bioprocess parameters that influence microbial lipase production

Carbon sources

Carbon sources represent the ultimate parameter that stimulates the growth of microorganisms for lipase production. However, among carbon sources, lipidic carbon sources play a vital role in lipase secretion since the enzymes are inducible in nature and are therefore generally produced in the presence of a lipid source including oils or other inducers (such as triacylglycerols, Tweens, hydrolysable esters, fatty acids, bile salts, glycerol) [36, 72]. For instance, lipase production by Bacillus flexus XJU-1 was stimulated by the presence of a surfactant (Tween-80), which favored the uptake of medium components and lipase release [73]. In addition, various oils such as coconut oil [74], olive oil [75], castor oil [13], cotton seed oil [73], soybean oil [76], sunflower oil [14], and neem oil [77] are used as inducers for lipase production. Lipases are produced with a low oil concentration (1–5%, v/v) [76]. When a large amount of oil is used, lipase secretion reduces due to limitation of oxygen transfer, which results in poor microbial growth [73].

In addition, other carbon sources including sugars, sugar alcohol, polysaccharides, whey, casamino acids, and other complexes influence lipase production [78, 79]. Mannitol was found as the best carbon source for lipase production by Streptomyces griseochromogenes [80]. In some cases, combination of carbohydrate and oil is used for maximum lipase secretion [8183]. Furthermore, non-conventional carbon sources including whey, beef tallow, wool scour effluent, cheap agro-industrial wastes etc. are also incorporated in fermentation medium for lipase production [8385].

Nitrogen sources

The addition of nitrogen sources (organic or inorganic) in culture medium influences the amount of lipase yield by microorganisms [86]. Organic nitrogen sources including peptone, yeast extract, or a combination of these resulted in a significant lipase production by most microbial strains [54, 75, 87]. This is typical of optimum lipase production recorded in the presence of soybean meal and corn steep liquor as nitrogen sources by some microorganisms [83, 8890]. On the other hand, inorganic nitrogen sources such as ammonium chloride, ammonium molybdate, and diammonium hydrogen phosphate are effective for maximum lipase production [9193]. However, the preference of organic nitrogen sources by some lipase-producing microorganisms can be attributed to the presence of some minerals, vitamins, or other growth factors that they contain [73]. In some cases, inclusion of amino acids in the fermentation medium plays a significant role in microbial lipase production [94]. This is typical of phenylalanine found as a preferred nitrogen source for lipase production by Streptomyces griseochromogenes [80]. However, a higher nitrogen source concentration inhibits lipase production due to nitrogen metabolite repression [95].

Physicochemical parameters

Physicochemical parameters including temperature, pH, metal ions, agitation speed, and incubation period play a crucial role in influencing the growth of microorganisms for lipase production. Microorganisms possess different optimum temperatures for maximum lipase yield. This usually correlates with peak growth temperatures of the organisms. For instance, optimum lipase production from Aspergillus niger (24 °C), Bacillus sp. SP5 (37 °C), Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB (40 °C), and Bacillus sp. RSJ1 (50 °C) was recorded at respective maximum growth temperatures [14, 9698]. In addition, initial pH of fermentation media is vital, as this stimulates the growth of the organisms for the secretion of the biocatalyst. Usually, maximum lipase production by bacteria occurs at neutral or alkaline pH [3, 86, 99]. However, at nearly neutral and acidic pH, enhanced lipase secretion was recorded from most yeasts and fungi [30, 100].

Microorganisms are cultivated at varying incubation periods for optimal lipase yield. This is notable of increased lipase secretion at 12, 36, and 48 h by Acinetobacter baylyi G40, Pseudomonas sp. LSK 25, and Arthrobacter sp. BGCC#490, respectively [22, 101, 102]. Metal ions stimulate secretion of lipase by microorganisms. Divalent metal ions such as Fe2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ improved lipase production from Bacillus subtilis PCSIRNL-39, Burkholderia sp., and Pseudomonas sp. LSK 25 [91, 102104]. Conversely, availability of metal ions can be inhibitory to microbial growth for lipase production. Agitation speed of fermentation medium is vital for microbial lipase production, as it enhances dissolved oxygen transfer rate and promotes dispersal of inducer oil micelles, thus permitting their contact into microorganisms [102, 105].

Strategies for optimization of microbial lipase production

Optimization of appropriate bioprocess parameters is crucial for improvement in growth and metabolic activities of microorganisms [106]. In addition, exploration of optimal conditions of the fermentation parameters is key for high lipase yields at lesser costs [14]. A traditional technique known as one variable-at-a-time (OVAT) approach involving change of one variable at a time while maintaining others at a constant level is commonly used to achieve these [107]. However, this method is not only time-consuming, laborious, and expensive, but also fails to depict interaction effects of the different variables tested, leading to misinterpretation of results [108]. In order to overcome these difficulties, statistical experimental designs have been recognized as a preferred method for lipase optimization studies [13, 14, 106, 109, 110] (Table 2). The significant variables influencing lipase production are usually selected with the aid of the Plackett-Burman design (PBD); the optimal conditions and interaction effects of these variables are deduced from the response surface methodology (RSM) or artificial neural network (ANN) [5, 112, 116, 120] (Table 2). The various experimental designs employed for lipase optimization are discussed in details below:

Table 2.

Improvements in lipase production from some microorganisms using statistical experimental designs

Microorganism Design Parameter optimized Improvement yield Reference
Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB RSM Temperature, agitation speed, pH, inducer oil concentration and inoculum volume 7.2-fold [14]
Burkholderia cepacia RSM Glucose, palm oil, incubation time, inoculum density and agitation 4-fold [111]
Enterobacter aerogenes IABR-0785 RSM Temperature, oil concentration, inoculum volume, pH and incubation period 1.4-fold [49]
Geobacillus thermoleovorans YN RSM Tween 80, olive oil, temperature and pH 4-fold [50]
Burkholderia sp. HL-10 RSM Olive oil, tryptone and Tween 80 3-fold [15]
Geobacillus sp. ARM RSM and ANN Temperature, medium volume, inoculum size, agitation rate, incubation period and pH 4.7-fold [51]
Staphylococcus xylosus RSM and ANN Temperature, pH, incubation period, inoculum size, and agitation speed 3.5-fold [112]
Alkalibacillus salilacus SR-079 Halo PBD and RSM Olive oil, KH2PO4, NaCl, and glucose 4.9-fold [113]
Thalassospira permensis M35-15 PBD and RSM Glucose, peptone, yeast powder and olive oil emulsifier 1.85-fold [114]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PBD and RSM Gum arabic, MgSO4, tryptone, and yeast extract 5.58-fold [115]
Aspergillus niger G783 RSM Corn starch, soybean meal and soybean oil 16.4% [116]
Fusarium solani SKWF7 RSM Palm oil, (NH4)2SO4 and CaCO3 1.7-fold [117]
Fusarium verticillioides RSM KH2PO4, MgSO4, peptone and sunflower oil 2-fold [118]
Candida rugosa NCIM 3462 PBD and RSM Glucose, groundnut oil, peptone, (NH4)2SO4 and FeCl3.6H2O 1.64-fold [119]
Debaryomyces hansenii YLL29 RSM Glucose, olive oil and pH 2.28-fold [109]

Placket-Burman design

Plackett-Burman design is employed for the screening of significant parameters from a large number of bioprocess parameters, and thus applicable in prelude studies involving selection of variables for further optimization studies [121, 122]. It comprises of two types of variables: real variables and dummy variables. Each variable is represented in two levels: high and low. PBD greatly lessens the overall number of experiments since only key variables that influence the synthesis of desired metabolite are selected [122, 123]. PBD is a dependable method for assessment of relative importance of bioprocess parameters for enhanced metabolite production by microorganisms [124126].

Response surface methodology

Response surface methodology is an assemblage of mathematical and statistical techniques for modelling and analysis in applications involving optimization of bioprocess parameters for enhanced yield of target metabolite (response) [14, 127]. RSM involves three basic steps: design of experiments for selection of significant parameters accompanied by path of steepest ascent/descent, and finally quadratic regression model is fitted and optimized with the aid of canonical regression method [122]. This approach permits building of models for precise approximation of true response function within a region around the optimum using bioprocess parameters as autonomous variables [107, 128]. RSM is a cost-effective approach applied in evaluating the interaction effects of fermentation variables. In addition, it results in improved productivity, lessens process changeability, and gives closer confirmation of predicted response to the experimental values [129]. Experimental designs such as central composite design (CCD), Box-Behnken design (BBD), or Doehlert design are widely used in RSM to approximate a response function to experimental data that cannot be described by linear functions [130].

Response surface methodology in combination with PBD resulted in enhanced practicability of process scale-up and commercialization of lipase production from a multitude of bacteria, fungi, and yeasts [14]. Ruchi et al. [115] screened eleven media components (peptone, tryptone, NH4Cl, NaNO3, yeast extract, glucose, glycerol, xylose, gum arabic, MgSO4, and NaCl) for lipase production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa using PBD. The most significant parameters (gum arabic, MgSO4, tryptone, and yeast extract) were further optimized by RSM. Maximum lipase yield (5.58-fold) was recorded when tryptone, gum arabic, MgSO4, and yeast extract were utilized at concentrations of 1.01%, 0.02%, 0.10%, and 0.02%, respectively. Similarly, the influence of ten medium components (peptone, glucose, NaCl, MgSO4.7H2O, FeSO4.7H2O, CaCl2, olive oil, KH2PO4, NH4Cl, and Na2HPO4) on lipase production by Alkalibacillus salilacus SR-079 Halo was studied using PBD [113]. Lipase production was maximally affected by olive oil, KH2PO4, NaCl, and glucose. Further optimization of the selected variables by RSM resulted in 4.9-fold enhancement in lipase production at optimal levels of glucose (1g/L), NaCl (4.18 mol/L), olive oil (2%), and KH2PO4 (5 g/L).

In addition, cocktail of RSM and OVAT are employed for optimization of lipase production [106]. Papagora et al. [109] optimized lipase production from Debaryomyces hansenii YLL29 using RSM. The simple one-factor-at-a-time strategy showed that glucose, olive oil, and pH were the significant variables influencing lipase production. Further optimization of the selected variables by RSM led to a 2.28-fold increase in lipase production at respective optimal levels of glucose (13.1 g/L), olive oil (19 g/L), and pH (6.4). Similarly, Lo et al. [15] employed RSM and OVAT for the optimization of extracellular lipase production by Burkholderia sp. HL-10. Preliminary studies by OVAT revealed that olive oil, tryptone, and Tween-80 exhibited significant effects on lipase production. Optimization by CCD resulted in almost 3-fold increase in maximum lipase production at respective optimum concentrations of olive oil (0.65%, v/v), tryptone (2.42%, w/v), and Tween-80 (0.15%, v/v).

Potential biotechnological applications of microbial lipases

Microbial lipases constitute an important class of biotechnologically valuable enzymes, mainly due to their versatility in terms of enzymatic properties and substrate specificity. These features make lipases the enzyme of choice for various applications in food, detergent, leather, pharmaceutical, textile, cosmetics, and paper industries etc. (Fig. 2) [3, 131]. Some of the biotechnological applications of microbial lipases are illustrated in Table 3 and discussed in details below:

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of potential biotechnological applications of microbial lipases

Table 3.

Some potential biotechnological applications of microbial lipases

Industry Role Product or application
Detergent Removal of fat and oil stains on clothes Clean fabrics
Pulp and paper Elimination of pitch from pulp produced during paper-making processes Paper with better quality
Pollution abatement Hydrolysis and trans-esterification of oils and greases Reduce organic pollutant load
Petroleum industry Trans-esterification Biodiesel
Leather Removal of fats and greases from skins and hides Cleaner finished products
Dairy foods Hydrolysis of milk fat; cheese ripening; modification of butter, fat and cream Flavoring agent in milk, cheese and butter
Beverages Improved aroma Alcoholic beverages, e.g. sake wine
Fats and oil industry Hydrolysis, esterification and inter-esterification Cocoa butter, margarine, fatty acids, glycerol, mono- and diglycerides
Bakery foods Enhance flavor content; prolong shelf-life; improve texture and softness Bread, rolls, pies, muffins, cookies, pastries
Meat and fish Flavor development; fat removal Meat and fish products
Food dressings Quality improvement Mayonnaise, dressing and whippings
Cosmetics Esterification Emulsifiers, moisturizers
Agrochemicals Esterification, hydrolysis Herbicides (such as phenoxypropionate)
Pharmaceuticals Trans-esterification, Hydrolysis Specialty lipids, digestive aids; intermediates used in the manufacture of medicines

Detergent industry

The most important and large-scale application of microbial lipases is their addition in detergent, used mainly in household and industrial laundry [132]. Lipases are employed in detergent formulations for the removal of oily stains on clothes, thus reducing the need for the patronage of detrimental chemicals. In addition, they are eco-friendly without harmful residue and render no threat to aquatic life [3, 133]. Among the qualities of lipase as a suitable additive in detergents include broad substrate specificity, ability to withstand harsh washing conditions, and exhibit catalytic activity in the presence of various components of detergent formulations [72, 134]. Lipolase from Thermomyces lanuginosus represents the first industrial lipase to be introduced into detergent and was commercialized in 1988 by Novo Nordisk. Other lipases including Lumafast (Pseudomonas mendocina) and Lipomax (Pseudomonas alcaligenes) were commercialized by Genencor (now Du Pont) [11]. Recently, lipases from several microorganisms have been characterized as potent detergent additives [132, 135].

Food industry

Fats and oils are vital constituents of foods; the nutritional and sensory values as well as physical properties of a triglyceride are greatly influenced by position of fatty acid in the glycerol backbone, the chain length of the fatty acid, and its degree of unsaturation etc. [136]. The modification of structure and composition of fats and oils is of great significance in food processing industries that require new economics and green technologies. Microbial lipases that are regiospecific and fatty acid specific are of enormous important for the production of many food products. For instance, lipase-catalyzed reactions can be used to modify and upgrade cheap oil into nutritionally important structured triacylglycerols such as cocoa butter substitutes, low calories triacylglycerols, and oleic acid enriched oils [137]. Lipases have also been used in foods to modify flavor by synthesis of esters of short chain fatty acids and alcohol, which are known flavor and fragrance compounds [138]. In addition, lipases are used in the removal of fats from meat and fish products to produce lean meat. The fat is removed during processing of the fish meat by addition of lipases, a phenomenon known as bio-lipolysis [139]. Lipases also play a substantial role in the fermentative production of sausage and to determine change in long-chain fatty acid released during ripening [3]. Over decades, microbial lipases have been used for refining rice flavor, modifying soybean milk, improving aroma, and enhancing fermentation in apple wine [140].

Cosmetics industry

Lipases are employed as a biocatalyst for the production of cosmetic products including isopropyl palmitate and 2-ethylhexyl palmitate, which are used as emollient in personal care products such as skin and sun-tan creams and bath oils [141]. In contrast to synthetic chemicals, the use of microbial lipases in cosmetics industries gives products of improved quality with minimum downstream processing. These include wax esters (esters of fatty acids and fatty alcohols) produced from catalytic reaction of lipase from Candida cylindracea and used in personal care products [142]. In addition, enzymatic production of water-soluble retinol derivatives from immobilized lipase has been reported [143]. Lipases are also used in hair waving preparations and as a component of topical anti-obese creams or as oral administration [11].

Pulp and paper industry

Microbial lipases are employed in pulp and paper industry for the removal of pitch (a hydrophobic component in wood), which creates severe problems in paper mill by producing gluey deposits in the paper machines and causes spots in the finished paper products [144]. This is achieved by hydrolyzing triglycerides in the pitch into monoglycerides, glycerol, and fatty acids, which are less sticky and highly hydrophilic [144, 145]. Thus, decreasing chemical consumption promote longevity of equipment and save energy and time [3]. The enzymatic pitch control technique involving the use of lipase has been a common practice for commercial paper making process [146]. These biocatalysts increase pulping rate and further enhance whiteness and strength of finished paper product [147].

Bioremediation of oily wastewater

Lipids are noxious components of industrial and municipal wastewaters since they contribute greatly to the organic load of the wastewater and promote the growth of filamentous microorganisms [148]. Therefore, their transformation into innocuous products is imperative. The use of biocatalysts serves as a promising technology for the treatment of high fat-containing wastewater [149]. An alternative to conventional approaches that is attracting growing interest is the use of enzymes, which significantly reduce the level of organic pollutants in the wastewater by means of enzymatic catalysis and enhance better performance of microbial community at the later stage of biological treatment process [149]. Application of lipases from different sources in the treatment of wastewater from lipid-processing factories, dairies, restaurants etc. offers a novel approach in enzyme biotechnology, thus making the wastewater acquiescent to conventional biological treatment [150]. The utilization of a solid enzymatic preparation from Penicillium restrictum for the treatment of dairy wastewater with high levels of oil and grease (O & G) has been reported [151]. Results obtained showed 13% higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency with 40% lower accumulation of O & G. In addition, enzymatic treatment of coconut mill effluent using lipase from Staphylococcus pasteuri COM-4A revealed COD and O & G removal efficiencies of 29% and 45%, respectively [150].

Conclusions

Microbial lipases are produced by diverse groups of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and yeasts. The production of these biocatalysts is influenced by nutritional and physicochemical parameters. Optimization of fermentation parameters through statistical experimental designs is crucial in order to maintain a balance among various components for enhanced lipase production. Microbial lipases are employed in high demands for a variety of biotechnological applications in food, cosmetics, pulp and paper, and detergent industries as well as in environmental bioremediation.

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa toward this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at are those of the authors and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF.

Author contribution

AIA conceived and drafted the manuscript while AOO edited the manuscript.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Patel N, Rai D, Shivam SS, Mishra U. Lipases: sources, production, purification, and applications. Recent Patents Biotechnol. 2019;13(1):45–56. doi: 10.2174/1872208312666181029093333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Joseph B, Ramteke PW, Thomas G. Cold active microbial lipases: some hot issues and recent developments. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(5):457–470. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hassan F, Shah AA, Hameed A. Influence of culture conditions on lipase production by Bacillus sp. FH5. Ann Microbiol. 2006;56:247–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borrelli GM, Trono D. Recombinant lipases and phospholipases and their uses as biocatalysts for industrial applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(9):20774–20840. doi: 10.3390/ijms160920774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kanmani P, Aravind J, Kumaresan K. An insight into microbial lipases and their environmental facet. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12(3):1147–1162. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gupta R, Gupta N, Rathi P. Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64(6):763–781. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1568-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Pascale D, Cusano AM, Autore F, Parrilli E, Di Prisco G, Marino G, Tutino ML. The cold-active Lip 1 lipase from the antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125 is a member of a new bacterial lipolytic enzyme family. Extremophiles. 2008;12(3):311–323. doi: 10.1007/s00792-008-0163-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nardini M, Dijkstra BW. α/β hydrolase fold enzyme: the family keeps growing. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999;9(6):732–737. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(99)00037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaeger K-E, Dijkstra BW, Reetz MT. Bacterial biocatalysts: molecular biology, three-dimensional structures, and biotechnological applications of lipases. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:315–351. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beisson F, Tiss A, Riviére C, Verger R. Methods for lipase detection and assay: a critical review. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2000;2:133–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chandra P, Singh ER, Arora PK. Microbial lipases and their industrial applications: a comprehensive review. Microb Cell Factories. 2020;19:169. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01428-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bharathi D, Rajalakshmi G. Microbial lipases: an overview of screening, production and purification. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;22:101368. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gururaj P, Ramalingam S, Devi GN, Gautam P. Process optimization for production and purification of a thermostable, organic solvent tolerant lipase from Acinetobacter sp. AU07. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47(3):647–657. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Adetunji AI, Olaniran AO. Optimization of culture conditions for enhanced lipase production by an indigenous Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB using response surface methodology. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2018;32(6):1514–1526. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lo C-F, Yu C-Y, Kuan I-C, Lee S-L. Optimization of lipase production by Burkholderia sp. using response surface methodology. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(11):14889–14897. doi: 10.3390/ijms131114889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Faisal PA, Hareesh ES, Priji P, Unni KN, Sajith S, Sreedevi S, Josh MS, Benjamin S (2014) Optimization of parameters for the production of lipase from Pseudomonas sp. BUP6 by solid state fermentation. Adv Enzyme Res2:125-133.
  • 17.Kalyani N, Saraswathy N (2014) Production of extracellular lipase by a new strain Staphylococcus aureus NK-LB37 isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Afr J Biotechnol 13 (28):2858-2866.
  • 18.Tripathi R, Singh J, Bharti RK, Thakur IS. Isolation, purification and characterization of lipase from Microbacterium sp. and its application in biodiesel production. Energy Procedia. 2014;54:518–529. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lopes MF, Leitão AL, Regalla M, Marques JJ, Carrondo MJ, Crespo MT. Characterization of a highly thermostable extracellular lipase from Lactobacillus plantarum. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;76(1-2):107–115. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Abdou AM. Purification and partial characterization of psychrotrophic Serratia marcescens lipase. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86(1):127–132. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73591-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mahdi BA, Bhattacharya A, Gupta A. Enhanced lipase production from Aeromonas sp. S1 using Sal deoiled seed cake as novel natural substrate for potential application in dairy wastewater treatment. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2012;87(3):418–426. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sharma A, Bardhan D, Patel R. Optimization of physical parameters for lipase production from Arthrobacter sp. BGCC#490. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2009;46:178–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hasan-Beikdashti M, Forootanfar H, Safiarian MS, Ameri A, Ghahremani MH, Khoshay MR, Faramarzi MA. Optimization of culture conditions for production of lipase by a newly isolated bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2012;43(5):670–677. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gumerov VM, Mardanov AV, Kolosov PM, Ravin NV. Isolation and functional characterization of lipase from the thermophilic alkali-tolerant bacterium Thermosyntropha lipolytica. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2012;48(4):338–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teng Y, Xu Y, Wang D. Changes in morphology of Rhizopus chinensis in submerged fermentation and their effect on production of mycelium-bound lipase. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2009;32(3):397–405. doi: 10.1007/s00449-008-0259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Naqvi SH, Dahot MU, Ali A, Khan MY, Rafiq M. Production and characterization of extracellular lipase secreted by Mucor geophillus. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(84):19598–19606. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oliveira BH, Coradi GV, Attili-Angelis D, Scauri C, Luques AHPG, Barbosa AM, Dekker RFH, Neto PO, Lima VMG. Comparison of lipase production on crambe oil and meal by Fusarium sp. (Gibberella fujikuroi complex) Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2013;115(12):1413–1425. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Loo JL, Khoramnia A, Lai OM, Long K, Ghazali HM. Mycelium-bound lipase from a locally isolated strain of Geotrichum candidum. Molecules. 2014;19(6):8556–8570. doi: 10.3390/molecules19068556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Colla LM, Primaz AL, Benedetti S, Loss RA, de Lima M, Reinehr CO, Bertolin TE, Costa JAV. Surface response methodology for the optimization of lipase production under submerged fermentation by filamentous fungi. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47(2):461–467. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Turati DFM, Morais Júnior WG, Terrasan CRF, Moreno-Perez S, Pessela BC, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan JM, Carmona EC. Immobilization of lipase from Penicillium sp. Section Gracilenta (CBMAI 1583) on different hydrophobic supports: modulation of functional properties. Molecules. 2017;22(2):339. doi: 10.3390/molecules22020339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu Z, Chi Z, Wang L, Li J. Production, purification and characterization of an extracellular lipase from Aureobasidium pullulans HN2.3 with potential application for the hydrolysis of edible oils. Biochem Eng J. 2008;40(3):445–451. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Potumarthi R, Subhakar C, Vanajakshi J, Jetty A. Effect of aeration and agitation regimes on lipase production by newly isolated Rhodotoru lamucilaginosa MTCC 8737 in stirred tank reactor using molasses as sole production medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;151(2-3):700–710. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8293-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laachari F, Elabed S, Sayari A, Mohammed I, Harchali E, Boubendir A, Ibnsouda SK. Biochemical characterization of a thermoactive and thermostable lipase from a newly isolated Trichosporon coremiiforme strain. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(28):4503–4511. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oliveira ACD, Fernandes ML, Mariano AB. Production and characterization of an extracellular lipase from Candida guilliermondii. Braz J Microbiol. 2014;45(4):1503–1511. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000400047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thirunavukarasu K, Purushothaman S, Gowthaman MK, Nakajima-Kambe T, Rose C, Kamini NR. Utilization of fishmeal and fish oil for production of Cryptococcus sp. MTCC 5455 lipase and hydrolysis of polyurethane thereof. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(9):5772–5780. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1697-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. Production, purification, characterization, and application of lipases. Biotechnol Adv. 2001;19(8):627–662. doi: 10.1016/s0734-9750(01)00086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adetunji AI, Olaniran AO (2018c) Immobilization and characterization of lipase from an indigenous Bacillus aryabhattai SE3-PB isolated from lipid-rich wastewater. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 48(10): 898–905 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Bora L, Bora M. Optimization of extracellular thermophilic highly alkaline lipase from thermophilic Bacillus sp. isolated from hot springs of Arunachal Pradesh India. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43(1):30–42. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000100004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee LP, Karbul HM, Citartan M, Gopinath SCB, Lakshmipriya T, Tang T-H. Lipase-secreting Bacillus species in an oil-contaminated habitat: promising strains to alleviate oil pollution. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/820575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Daouadji KL, Reffas FZI, Benine ML, Abbouni B. Optimization of various physical and chemical parameters for lipase production by Bacillus coagulans. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2015;15(5):962–968. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shariff FM, Abd Rahman RNZR, Basri M, Salleh AB. A newly isolated thermostable lipase from Bacillus sp. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(5):2917–2934. doi: 10.3390/ijms12052917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ghori MI, Iqbal MJ, Hameed A. Characterization of a novel lipase from Bacillus sp. isolated from tannery wastes. Braz J Microbiol. 2011;42(1):22–29. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822011000100003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kumar S, Kikon K, Upadhyay A, Kanwar SS, Gupta R. Production, purification, and characterization of lipase from thermophilic and alkaliphilic Bacillus coagulans BTS-3. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;41(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Castro-Ochoa LD, Rodríguez-Gómez C, Valerio-Alfaro G, Ros RO. Screening, purification and characterization of the thermoalkalophilic lipase produced by Bacillus thermoleovorans CCR11. Enzym Microb Technol. 2005;37(6):648–654. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kumar R, Sharma A, Kumar A, Singh D. Lipase from Bacillus pumilus RK31: production and some properties. World Appl Sci. 2012;J16(7):940–948. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Anbu P, Noh M-J, Kim D-H, Seo J-S, Hur B-K, Min KH. Screening and optimization of extracellular lipases by Acinetobacter species isolated from oil-contaminated soil in South Korea. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(20):4147–4156. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jagtap SC, Chopade BA. Purification and characterization of lipase from Acinetobacter haemolyticus TA 106 isolated from human skin. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 2015;37(1):7–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sarac N, Ugur A. A green alternative for oily wastewater treatment: lipase from Acinetobacter haemolyticus NS02-30. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;1(42):19750–19759. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kumari A, Mahapatra P, Banerjee R. Statistical optimization of culture conditions by response surface methodology for synthesis of lipase with Enterobacter aerogenes. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2009;52(6):1349–1356. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abdel-Fattah YF. Optimization of thermostable lipase production from a thermophilic Geobacillus sp. using Box-Behnken experimental design. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24(14):1217–1222. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ebrahimpour A, Abd Rahman RNZR, Ch’ng DHE, Basri M, Salleh A. A modeling study by response surface methodology and artificial neural network on culture parameters optimization for thermostable lipase production from a newly isolated thermophilic Geobacillus sp. strain ARM. BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abd Rahman RNZR, Leow TC, Salleh A, Basri M. Geobacillus zalihae sp. nov., a thermophilic lipolytic bacterium isolated from palm oil mill effluent in Malaysia. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boran R, Ugur A. Partial purification and characterization of the organic solvent-tolerant lipase produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens RB02-3 isolated from milk. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;40(4):229–241. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2010.488929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mobarak-Qamsari E, Kasra-Kermanshahi R, Moosavi-nejad Z. Isolation and identification of a novel, lipase-producing bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa KM110. Iranian J Microbiol. 2011;3(2):92–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sreelatha B, Rao VK, Kumar RR, Girisham S, Reddy SM. Culture conditions for the production of thermostable lipase by Thermomyces lanuginosus. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. 2017;6(1):87–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Das A, Shivakumar S, Bhatttacharya S, Shakya S, Swathi SS. Purification and characterization of a surfactant-compatible lipase from Aspergillus tamarii JGIFO6 exhibiting energy-efficient removal of oil stains from polycotton fabric. 3. Biotech. 2016;6(2):131. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0449-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sethi BK, Nanda PK, Sahoo S. Characterization of biotechnologically relevant extracellular lipase produced by Aspergillus terreus NCFT 4269.10. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47(1):143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pacheco SMV, Cruz Júnior A, Morgado AF, FurigoJúnior A, Amadi OC, Guisán JM, Pessela B. Isolation and screening of filamentous fungi producing extracellular lipase with potential in biodiesel production. Adv Enzyme Res. 2015;3:101–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pereira MG, Vici AC, Facchini FDA, Tristão AP, Cursino-Santos JR, Sanches PR, Jorge JA, Polizeli MLTM. Screening of filamentous fungi for lipase production: Hypocrea pseudokoningiia new producer with a high biotechnological potential. Biocatal Biotransform. 2014;32(1):74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.de Almeida AF, Dias KB, da Silva ACC, Terrasan CRF, Tauk-Tornisielo SM, Carmona EC. Agroindustrial wastes as alternative for lipase production by Candida viswanathii under solid-state cultivation: purification, biochemical properties, and its potential for poultry fat hydrolysis. Enzyme Res. 2016;2016:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2016/1353497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nair S, Kumar P. Molecular characterization of a lipase-producing Bacillus pumilus strain (NMSN-1d) utilizing colloidal water-dispersible polyurethane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;23(10):1441–1449. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Singh M, Singh RS, Banerjee UC. Enantioselective transesterification of racemic phenyl ethanol and its derivatives in organic solvent and ionic liquid using Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase. Process Biochem. 2010;45(1):25–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A. Methods for detection and characterization of lipases: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27(6):782–798. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ertuğrul S, Dönmez G, Takaç S. Isolation of lipase producing Bacillus sp. from olive mill wastewater and improving its enzyme activity. J Hazard Mater. 2007;149(3):720–724. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bora L, Kalita MC. Production and optimization of thermostable lipase from a thermophilic Bacillus sp. LBN 4. Internet J Microbiol. 2007;4(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kim EK, Jang WH, Ko JH, Kang JS, Noh MJ, Yoo OJ. Lipase and its modulator from Pseudomonas sp. strain KFCC 10818: proline-to-glutamine substitution at position 112 induces formation of enzymatically active lipase in the absence of the modulator. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(20):5937–5941. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.20.5937-5941.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Emmanuel G, Esakkiraj P, Jebadhas A, Iyapparaj P, Palavesam A. Investigation of lipase production by milk isolate Serratia rubidaea. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2008;46(1):60–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kashmiri MA, Ahmad A, Butt BW. Production, purification and partial characterization of lipase from Trichoderma viride. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006;5(10):878–882. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rasmey AM, Aboseidah AA, Gaber S, Mahran F. Characterization and optimization of lipase activity produced by Pseudomonas monteilli 2403-KY120354 isolated from ground beef. Afr J Biotechnol. 2017;16(2):96–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Alkan H, Baysal Z, Uyar F, Dogru M. Production of lipase by a newly Bacillus coagulans under solid-state fermentation using melon wastes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007;136(2):183–192. doi: 10.1007/BF02686016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Melani NB, Tambourgi EB, Silveira E. Lipases: from production to applications. Sep Purif Rev. 2019;49(2):143–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Martínez-Corona R, Banderas-Martínez FJ, Pérez-Castillo JN, Cortés-Penagos C, González-Hernández JC. Avocado oil as an inducer of the extracellular lipase activity of Kluyveromyces marxianus L-2029. Food Sci Technol. 2020;40:121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Niyonzima FN, More SS, Muddapur U. Optimization of fermentation culture conditions for alkaline lipase production by Bacillus flexus XJU-1.Curr. Trends Biotechnol Pharm. 2013;7(3):793–803. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Khoramnia A, Ebrahimpour A, Beh BK, Lai OM. Production of a solvent, detergent, and thermotolerant lipase by a newly isolated Acinetobacter sp. in submerged and solid-state fermentations. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2011/702179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nerurkar M, Manasi J, Sujata P, Ravindra A. Application of lipase from marine bacteria Bacillus sonorensis as an additive in detergent formulation. J Surfactant Deterg. 2013;16(3):435–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chauhan M, Chauhan RS, Garlapati VK. Evaluation of a new lipase from Staphylococcus sp. for detergent additive capability. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2013/374967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gulati R, Isar J, Kumar V, Prasad AK, Parmar VS, Saxena RK. Production of a novel alkaline lipase by Fusarium globulosum using neem oil, and its applications. Pure Appl Chem. 2005;77(1):251–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ghanem EH, Al-Sayed HA, Saleh KM. An alkalophilic thermostable lipase produced by a new isolated of Bacillus alcalophilus.World. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16(5):459–464. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rashid N, Shimada Y, Ezaki S, Atomi H, Imanaka T. Low temperature lipase from psychrotrophic Pseudomonas sp. strain KB700A. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(9):4064–4069. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4064-4069.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gunalakshmi B, Sahu M, Sivakumar K, Thangaradjou T, Sudha S, Kanan L. Investigation on lipase producing actinomycete stain LE-1, isolated from shrimp pond. Res J Microbiol. 2008;3:73–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Thirunavukarasu K, Edwinoliver NG, Anbarasan S, Gowthaman MK, Iefuji H, Kamini NR. Removal of triglyceride soil from fabrics by a novel lipase from Cryptococcus sp. S-2. Process Biochem. 2008;43(7):701–706. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kumar SS, Kumar L, Sahai V, Gupta R. A thiol-activated lipase from Trichosporon asahii MSR 54: detergent compatibility and presoak formulation for oil removal from soiled cloth at ambient temperature. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;26(3):427–432. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008-0513-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang J-Y, Ma C-L, Bao Y-M, Xu P-S. Lipase entrapment in protamine-induced bio-zirconia particles: characterization and application to the resolution of (R, S)-1-phenylethanol. Enzym Microb Technol. 2012;51(1):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Aravindan R, Anbumathi P, Viruthagiri T. Lipase applications in food industry. Indian J Biotechnol. 2007;6:141–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Romdhane IB, Fendri A, Gargouri Y, Gargouri A, Belghith HA. novel thermoactive and alkaline lipase from Talaromyces thermophilus fungus for use in laundry detergents. Biochem Eng J. 2010;53(1):112–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ilesanmi OI, Adekunle AE, Omolaiye JA, Olorode EM, Ogunkanmi AL. Isolation, optimization and molecular characterization of lipase producing bacteria from contaminated soil. Sci Afr. 2020;8:e00279. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Cherif S, Mnif S, Hadrich F, Abdelkafi S, Sayadi S. A newly high alkaline lipase: an ideal choice for application in detergent formulations. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:221–228. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang X, Yu X, Xu Y. Homologous expression, purification and characterization of a novel high-alkaline and thermal stable lipase from Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 25416. Enzym Microb Technol. 2009;45(2):94–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wang H, Shao J, Wei YJ, Zhang J, Qi W. A novel low temperature alkaline lipase from Acinetobacter johnsonii LP28 suitable for detergent formulation. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2011;49(1):96–102. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lailaja VP, Chandrasekaran M. Detergent compatible alkaline lipase produced by marine Bacillus smithii BTMS11.World. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;29(8):1349–1360. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1298-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rathi P, Saxena RK, Gupta R. A novel alkaline lipase from Burkholderia cepacia for detergent formulation. Process Biochem. 2001;37(2):187–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bayoumi RA, El-louboudey SS, Sidkey NM, Abd-El-Rahman MA. Production, purification and characterization of thermos-alkalophilic lipase for application in bio-detergent industry. J Appl Sci Res. 2007;3(12):1752–1765. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Brozzoli,V, Crognale S, Sampedro I, Federici F, D’Annibale A, Petruccioli M (2009) Assessment of olive-mill wastewater as a growth medium for lipase production by Candida cylindracea in bench-top reactor. Bioresour Technol 100 (13):3395-3402. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 94.Ghosh PK, Saxena RK, Gupta R, Yadav RP, Davidson S. Microbial lipases: production and applications. Sci Prog. 1996;79:119–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Niyonzima FN, More SS. Microbial detergent compatible lipases. J Sci Ind Res. 2015;74:105–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sharma R, Soni SK, Vohra RM, Jolly RS, Gupta LK, Gupta JK. Production of extracellular alkaline lipase from a Bacillus sp. RSJ1 and its application in ester hydrolysis. Indian J Microbiol. 2002;42:49–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.El-Batal AI, Farrag AA, Elsayed MA, El-Khawaga AM. Effect of environmental and nutritional parameters on the extracellular lipase production by Aspergillus niger. Int Lett Nat Sci. 2016;60:18–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bharathi D, Rajalakshmi G, Komathi S. Optimization and production of lipase enzyme from bacterial strains isolated from petrol spill soil. J King Saud Univ --Sci. 2019;31:898–901. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zheng C. Growth characteristics and enzyme production optimization of lipase producing strain. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2018;108:042087. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Taskin M, Ucar MH, Unver Y, Kara AA, Ozdemir M, Ortucu S. Lipase production with free and immobilized cells of cold-adapted yeast Rhodotorula glutinis HL25. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2016;8:97–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Furini G, Berger JS, Campos JAM, van der Sand ST, Germani JC. Production of lipolytic enzymes by bacteria isolated from biological effluent systems. Ann Braz Acad Sci. 2018;90:2955–2965. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201820170952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Salwoom L, Abd Rahman RNZR, Salleh AB, Shariff FM, Convey P, Pearce D, Ali MSM. Isolation, characterization, and lipase production of a cold-adapted bacterial strain Pseudomonas sp. LSK 25 isolated from Signy Island, Antarctica. Molecules. 2019;24:715. doi: 10.3390/molecules24040715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kanwar L, Gogoi BK, Goswami P. Production of a Pseudomonas lipase in n-alkane substrate and its isolation using an improved ammonium sulfate precipitation technique. Bioresour Technol. 2002;84:207–211. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00061-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mazhar H, Abbas N, Ali S, Sohai LA, Hussain Z, Ali SS. Optimized production of lipase from Bacillus subtilis PCSIRNL-39. Afr J Biotechnol. 2017;16:1106–1115. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Geoffry K, Achur RN. Screening and production of lipase from fungal organisms. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:241–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Adetunji AI, Olaniran AO. Statistical modeling and optimization of protease production by an autochtonous Bacillus aryabhattai Ab15-ES: a response surface methodology approach. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;24:101528. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Puri S, Beg QK, Gupta R. Optimization of alkaline protease production from Bacillus sp. by response surface methodology. Curr Microbiol. 2002;44:286–290. doi: 10.1007/s00284-001-0006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bas D, Boyaci IH. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng. 2007;78(3):836–845. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Papagora C, Roukas T, Kotzekidou P. Optimization of extracellular lipase production by Debaryomyces hansenii isolates from dry-salted olives using response surface methodology. Food Bioprod Process. 2013;91(4):413–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yang F, Long L, Sun X, Wu H, Li T, Xiang W. Optimization of medium using response surface methodology for lipid production by Scenedesmus sp. Mar Drugs. 2014;12(3):1245–1257. doi: 10.3390/md12031245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Rathi P, Goswami VK, Sahai V, Gupta R. Statistical medium optimization and production of a hyperthermostable lipase from Burkholderia cepacia in a bioreactor. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(6):930–936. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Khoramnia A, Lai OM, Ebrahimpour A, Tanduba CJ, Voon TS, Mukhlis S. Thermostable lipase from a newly isolated Staphylococcus xylosus strain; process optimization and characterization using RSM and ANN. Electron J Biotechnol. 2010;13(5):15–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Samaei-Nouroozi A, Rezaei S, Khoshnevis N, Doosti M, Hajihoseini R, Khoshayand MR, Faramarzi MA. Medium-based optimization of an organic solvent-tolerant extracellular lipase from the isolated halophilic Alkalibacillus salilacus. Extremophiles. 2015;19(5):933–947. doi: 10.1007/s00792-015-0769-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Kai W, Peisheng Y. Optimization of lipase production from a novel strain Thalassospira permensis M35-15 using response surface methodology. Bioengineered. 2016;7(5):298–303. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1197713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ruchi G, Anshu G, Khare SK. Lipase from solvent tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain: production optimization by response surface methodology and application. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(11):4796–4802. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Jia J, Yang X, Wu Z, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Guo H, Lin CSK, Wang J, Wang Y. Optimization of fermentation medium for extracellular lipase production from Aspergillus niger using response surface methodology. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2015/497462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kanmani P, Karthik S, Aravind J, Kumaresan K. The use of response surface methodology as a statistical tool for media optimization in lipase production from the dairy effluent isolate Fusarium solani. ISRN Biotechnol. 2013;2013:1–8. doi: 10.5402/2013/528708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Facchini FDA, Vici AC, Pereira MG, Jorge JA, Polizeli MLTM. Enhanced lipase production of Fusarium verticillioides by using response surface methodology and wastewater pretreatment application. J Biochem Technol. 2015;6(3):996–1002. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rajendran A, Thangavelu V. Optimization of medium composition for lipase production by Candida rugosa NCIM 3462 using response surface methodology. Can J Microbiol. 2007;53(5):643–655. doi: 10.1139/W07-017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.de Menezes LHS, Carneiro LL, Tavares IMC, Santos PH, das Chagas TP, Mendes AA, da Silva EGP, Franco M, de Oliveira JR (2020) Artificial neural network hybridized with genetic algorithm for optimization of lipase production from Penicillium roqueforti ATCC 10110 in solid-state fermentation. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101885, 31, 101885.
  • 121.Saxena R, Singh R. Statistical optimization of conditions for protease production from Bacillus sp. Acta Biol Szeged. 2010;54:135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF02729064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Singh V, Haque S, Niwas R, Srivastava A, Pasupuleti M, Tripathi CKM. Strategies for fermentation medium optimization: an in-depth review. Front Microbiol. 2017;7:2087. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Adinarayana K, Ellaiah P. Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for the production of alkaline protease by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. J. Pharm Pharm Sci. 2002;5:272–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Singh V, Tripathi C. Production and statistical optimization of a novel olivanic acid by Streptomyces olivaceus MTCC 6820. Process Biochem. 2008;43:1313–1317. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rajeswari P, Arul JP, Amiya R, Jebakumar SRD. Characterization of saltern based Streptomyces sp. and statistical media optimization for its improved antibacterial activity. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:753. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Mehta A, Sharma R, Gupta R. Statistical optimization by response surface methodology to enhance lipase production by Aspergillus fumigatus. Open Microbiol J. 2019;13:86–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Oskouie SFG, Tabandeh F, Yakhchali B, Eftekhar F. Response surface optimization of medium composition for alkaline protease production by Bacillus clausii. Biochem Eng J. 2008;39:37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Queiroga AC, Pintado ME, Malcata FX. Use of response surface methodology to optimize protease synthesis by a novel strain of Bacillus sp. isolated from Portuguese sheep wool. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:36–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Shabbiri K, Adnan A, Jamil S, Ahmad W, Noor B, Rafique HM. Medium optimization of protease production by Brevibacterium lihens DSM 20158 using statistical approach. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;2012:1051–1061. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220120003000031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Li Y, Liu Z, Cui F, Liu Z, Zhao H. Application of Plackett-Burman design and Doehlert design to evaluate nutritional requirements for xylanase production by Alternaria mali ND-16. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77:285–291. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Priyanka P, Tan Y, Kinsella GK, Henehan GT, Ryan BJ. Solvent stable microbial lipases: current understanding and biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Lett. 2019;41(2):203–220. doi: 10.1007/s10529-018-02633-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wang Y, Ma R, Li S. An alkaline and surfactant-tolerant lipase from Trichoderma lentiforme ACCC30425 with high application potential in the detergent industry. AMB Express. 2018;8:95. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0618-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hasan F, Shah AA, Javed S, Hameed A. Enzymes used in detergents: lipases. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(31):4836–4844. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Bacha AB, Al-Assaf A, Moubayed NM, Abid I. Evaluation of a novel thermo-alkaline Staphylococcus aureus lipase for application in detergent formulations. Saud J Biol Sci. 2018;25(3):409–417. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Devi R, Nampoothiri KM, Sukumaran RK, Sindhu R, Arumugam M (2019) Lipase of Pseudomas guariconesis as an additive in laundry detergents and transesterification biocatalysts. J Basic Microbiol 60:112–125. 10.1002/jobm.201900326 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 136.Andualema B, Gessesse A. Microbial lipases and their industrial applications: review. Biotechnol. 2012;11:100–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gupta R, Rathi P, Bradoo S. Lipase mediated upgradation of dietary fats and oils. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2003;43(6):635–644. doi: 10.1080/10408690390251147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Raveedran S, Parameswaran B, Ummalyma SB, Abraham A, Mathew AK, Madhavan A, Rebello S, Pandey A. Applications of microbial enzymes in food industry. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2018;56(1):16–30. doi: 10.17113/ftb.56.01.18.5491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kazlauskas RJ, Bornscheur UT (1998) Biotransformations with lipases. In: Rehm HJ, Pihler G, Stadler A, Kelly PJW (eds) Biotechnology. VCH, New York, pp 37–192
  • 140.Guerrand D. Lipases industrial applications: focus on food and agroindustries. OCL. 2017;24(4):D403. [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Ansorge-Schumacher MB, Thum O. Immobilized lipases in cosmetics industry. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(15):6475–6490. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35484a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lehtinen T, Efimova E, Santala S, Santala V. Improved fatty aldehyde and wax ester production by overexpression of fatty acyl-CoA reductases. Microb Cell Factories. 2018;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12934-018-0869-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zasada M, Budzisz E. Retinoids: active molecules influencing skin structure formation in cosmetic and dermatological treatments. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2019;36(4):392–397. doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.87443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Jaeger KE, Reetz MT. Microbial lipases from versatile tools for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16(9):396–403. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01195-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Fakuda S, Hayashi S, Ochiai H, Iiizumi T, Nakamura K. Improvers for deinking of wastepaper. Japanese Patent. 1990;2:229–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Bajpai P. Application of enzymes in paper and pulp industry. Biotechnol Prog. 1999;15(2):147–157. doi: 10.1021/bp990013k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Demuner BJ, Pereira JN, Antunes A. Technology prospecting on enzymes for the pulp and paper industry.J. Technol Manag Innov. 2011;6(3):148–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Adetunji AI, Olaniran AO. Treatment of lipid-rich wastewater using a mixture of free or immobilized bioemulsifier and hydrolytic enzymes from indigenous bacterial isolates. Desalin Water Treat. 2018;132:274–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Ferreira-Leitão VS, Cammarota MS, Aguieiras ECG, Vasconcelos de Sá LR, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Freire DMG. The protagonism of biocatalysis in green chemistry and its environmental benefits. Catalysts. 2017;7(1):9. [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kanmani P, Kumaresan K, Aravind J. Pretreatment of coconut mill effluent using celite-immobilized hydrolytic enzyme preparation from Staphylococcus pasteuri and its impact in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31:1249–1258. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Rosa DR, Cammarota MC, Freire DMG. Production and utilization of a novel solid enzymatic preparation produced by Penicillium restrictum in activated sludge systems treating wastewater with high levels of oil and grease. Environ Eng Sci. 2006;23(5):814–823. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES