Abstract
Yeasts can play important roles in promoting plant growth; however, little information is available in this regard for yeasts in water of bromeliad tanks. Here, we characterize the ability of 79 yeast isolates from tank bromeliad Vriesea minarum, an endangered species, to solubilize phosphate, secrete siderophores, and synthesize indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The results showed that 67.8% of all assayed yeast isolates mobilized inorganic phosphate; 40.0% secreted siderophores; and 89.9% synthetized IAA and IAA-like compounds. Among the species studied, Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 is highlighted for producing IAA (76.1 μg mL−1) and siderophores, and solubilizing phosphate. In addition, evaluation of the effects of filtrate containing IAA-like compounds produced by the C. vrieseae on the development and photosynthetic performance of V. minarum seedlings found it to improve seedling growth equal to that of commercial IAA. These results demonstrate that C. vrieseae can produce compounds with great potential for future use as biofertilizer agents.
Keywords: Bromeliaceae, Campo Rupestre, Indole-3-acetic acid, Siderophores, Solubilizing phosphate, Water-tank yeast
Introduction
Bromeliaceae is one of the most morphologically, physiologically, and ecologically distinct clades of Neotropical angiosperms with 3403 described species [1–3] distributed among eight subfamilies [4]. Bromeliads are one of the most important, diverse, and conspicuous elements of Campo Rupestre (CR) vegetation in Brazil [5–8]. CR is a heterogeneous, rocky, mountaintop (>900 m asl), grassland vegetation mostly occurring in the Espinhaço Range, in southeastern Brazil [7, 8]. This species-rich vegetation is controlled by topography and pedo-environmental as well as micro-climatic conditions [9, 10]. Bromeliads nutritionally benefit from their tank phytotelm due to associations with free-living bacteria (e.g., diazotrophs, phototrophs, and decomposers), fungi (e.g., decomposers), invertebrates (e.g., insect detritivores, arthropod predators), and vertebrates [11]. Vriesea minarum L. B. Sm. is a rupicolous bromeliad of CR that is endemic to the Iron Quadrangle (IQ) and currently listed as endangered in the red list of Brazilian plant species [12, 13]. The species is capable of absorbing water and nutrients in its phytotelm through foliar trichomes (leaf-absorbing trichomes, hereafter – LATs), while its roots are reduced to the purely mechanical support function of attaching the plants to the substrate [14]. Gomes et al. [15] found a community of 36 species of yeasts in association with water from V. minarum tanks; the yeast species Kazachstania rupicola [16], Hannaella pagnoccae [17], Occultifur brasiliensis [15], Bullera vrieseae [18] reclassified by Liu et al. [19] as Carlosrosaea vrieseae, Kockovaella libkindii [20], and Pattersoniomyces tillandsiae [21] were described based on isolates obtained in this work. Other yeast species associated with bromeliads of tropical environments have also been described [17, 20, 22–29]; however, little is known about the functional diversity of yeasts associated with bromeliads.
The enzymatic capabilities of these microorganisms may have significant ecological functions for bromeliad life cycles. Among yeast isolates found in the water tank of V. minarum, 80% exhibited at least one enzymatic activity. Some of the enzymes produced by these yeasts may increase carbon and nitrogen availability for the microbial food web in tanks and facilitate nutrient uptake by bromeliads through the leaf surfaces of their tank [15]. The form in which nutrients are made available in tanks is determined by the source and the complex interactions among tank microbes, which transform them into forms that bromeliads can uptake [30]. There has been recent interest in exploiting beneficial microorganisms of bromeliad tanks with much of this research focusing on the use of particular species of bacterial for what is commonly referred to as plant growth promoting (PGP) [30–33]. Meanwhile, the role of other microbial groups, including yeasts, has received less attention.
A diverse range of yeasts exhibit plant growth–promoting traits, including phytohormone production [34–41]; phosphate solubilization [35, 42–45]; and siderophore production [44, 46]. Auxins, in particular indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), comprise a class of plant growth regulators known to stimulate both rapid (e.g., increases in cell elongation) and long-term (e.g., cell division and differentiation) responses in plants [47], including modifications to root morphology. Diverse soil microorganisms, including yeasts, can produce physiologically active quantities of auxins, which have pronounced effects on plant growth and development [44, 48–50]. In addition to phytohormone production, microbes can also enhance nutrient uptake through several mechanisms.
Plant growth–promoting yeasts (PGPYs) can solubilize inorganic phosphates releasing P and producing organic acids [33, 42, 44, 51, 52]. These acids can chelate the metal cation of phosphorus salts, thus increasing the bioavailability of this essential element to plant tissues, thereby preventing the precipitation of P [53]. Another positive effect that PGPYs have on plant nutrition is the production of siderophores [44, 54]. Siderophores are small, high-affinity metal-chelating compounds that, once secreted, bind insoluble iron ions to form siderophore-Fe complexes that are taken up either by the microorganism itself or by the plant [55]. In addition, siderophores provide a nutritional competitive advantage against pathogens by establishing biocontrol activity [50, 55–58].
The synergistic effects of direct PGP factors, such as plant nutritional supplementation and phytohormone production, and indirect factors, such as restricting pathogen colonization and nutrient scavenging by plant pathogens, are conducive to overall plant growth [44]. Meanwhile, in particular, the possible role of yeasts of water tanks as PGPYs that optimize nutrient availability and/or biochemical mechanisms underlying the nutritional process so as to improve conditions for bromeliad establishment and growth has yet to be addressed. Thus, we set out to study yeasts of the tank of the bromeliad V. minarum, which is a vulnerable species locally in Serra da Piedade [59] and an endangered species in the CR ecosystem of Brazil [13]. More specifically, we characterized 79 yeast isolates by testing their ability to solubilize phosphate, secrete siderophores, and synthesize IAA, a key phytohormone. In addition, we evaluated the effects of IAA produced by the yeast C. vrieseae on the development and photosynthetic performance of V. minarum seedlings. Altogether, the data reported here show that a functional approach can be used to identify yeast isolates with potential use for promoting plant growth as biofertilizer agents. The future use of these yeasts is likely to yield innovative environmentally friendly applications in the cultivation of bromeliads.
Materials and methods
Isolates
Tests were performed on a total of 79 yeast isolates representing 30 species obtained from tank water of V. minarum previously identified [15] and stored in the laboratory at − 80 °C. At least one and a maximum six isolates were tested for each species. The yeasts were grown by streaking YM agar plates (yeast extract-malt extract agar; 1.0% glucose, 0.5% peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% malt extract, and 2.0% agar supplemented with 0.02% chloramphenicol), followed by incubation at 25 °C for 48 h prior to use. All experiments were performed with five replicates.
In vitro screening for inorganic phosphate solubilization
Inorganic phosphate solubilization was assayed following the method of Oliveira et al. [60]. Yeast isolates were inoculated onto plates with sterilized modified Pikovskaya’s medium containing Ca3(PO4)2 (tri-calcium phosphate), an insoluble inorganic form of P, followed by incubation at 28 °C for 120 h. Formation of a clear zone around the colony indicated phosphate solubilization activity [61].
In vitro screening for siderophore production
Siderophore production was qualitatively determined by modified CAS agar assay [62]. Yeast (5 μL inoculum of a 48 h culture) was trickled on CAS agar medium and incubated for 120 h in the dark at 28 °C. A bottom agar plate of CAS-blue agar (10 mL of dye solution) was prepared [63] on which, once solidified, an overlay of modified Sabouraud agar (6 mL) was applied. Secretion of siderophores by yeast was visualized by a color change of the medium from blue to yellow/orange/pink as the produced siderophores, binding iron more tightly than the ferric complex of Chrome Azurol S, removed iron from the CAS agar medium.
In vitro screening for IAA production
Production of IAA was tested using the colorimetric method described by Gordon and Weber [64] with some modifications. Yeast isolates were prepared from 2-day-old cultures in YM agar; 200 μL of culture in sterile NaCl solution (0.85%) was used for inoculation (approximately 1.2 × 109 CFU mL−1). Flasks with 5 mL of GYMP broth (2% glucose, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% malt extract, 0.2% mono sodium phosphate) amended with 5 mM L-Tryptophan (Sigma) (Trp) and yeast suspension were incubated on an orbital shaker (model MA830, Marconi, Brazil) at 150 rpm at 28 °C in the dark for five days. Non-inoculated flasks served as controls. Cultures were centrifuged at 11,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C to pellet yeast and obtain the supernatant; 100 μL of Salkowski reagent (FeCl3-HClO4) was added to 100 μL of the supernatant. The absorbance at 530 nm was measured, after 30 min at room temperature and in the dark, using a UV-Vis varioskan spectrophotometer (Varioskan® Flash, Thermo Scientific). Similarly, a color gradient was also developed using standard solutions of IAA (Sigma-Aldrich) (10–120 μg mL−1), and a standard curve was established; IAA and IAA-like compounds were expressed as IAA equivalents [34]. To determine whether the pathway for synthesizing of IAA through these yeasts is independent of Trp, we also analyzed IAA production in yeast cultures without Trp [36, 44].
Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 cultivation and yeast filtrate acquisition (IAA and IAA-like)
Isolated yeasts were prepared from a 2-day-old culture in YM agar; 200 μL of culture in sterile NaCl solution (0.85%) was used for inoculation (approximately 1.2 × 109 CFU mL−1). Flasks with 5 mL of GYMP broth amended with 5 mM tryptophan (Sigma) and yeast suspension were incubated on an orbital shaker (model MA830, Marconi, Brazil) at 150 rpm at 28 °C in the dark for 5 days.
The supernatant and cell pellets were partitioned by centrifugation at 11,000×g at 4 °C for 15 min and the supernatant was filtrated through a 0.22-μm sterile membrane filter (Millipore®, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Simultaneously, 100 μL of Salkowski reagent (FeCl3-HClO4) was added to 100 μL of the supernatant. The absorbance at 530 nm was measured, after 30 min at room temperature and in the dark, using a UV-Vis varioskan spectrophotometer (Varioskan® Flash, Thermo Scientific). The filtrate with IAA and IAA-like compounds was quantified, expressed as IAA equivalents, and diluted for immediate use in culture medium for the growth of V. minarum seedlings.
Plant material and in vitro establishment
Seedlings of V. minarum L.B. Smith (Bromeliaceae) were used to understand the effects of the filtrate containing IAA produced by C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 on plant growth and development, when added in the culture medium or in the tank region, due to the particular ability of this bromeliad of absorbing water and nutrients through LATs (14). Seeds of V. minarum were collected from mature infructescences from a naturally developed specimen at Serra da Piedade (19° 48′–19° 50′ S, 43° 39′–43° 42′ W), where the yeast was isolated, in the Southern Espinhaço Range in Southeast Brazil, under licensing from regulatory agencies.
In a horizontal laminar flow cabinet, the seeds were surface sterilized for 3 min in 70% ethanol and 15 min in 2% sodium hypochlorite plus 0.1% Tween-20, followed by four rinses in sterile distilled water. Seeds were then germinated on water agar (1.0%) supplemented with 20 μg mL−1 benomyl [methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)-2-benzimidazolecarbamate, Sigma-Aldrich] and kept in growth chamber (model MA403, Marconi, Brazil) for 30 days with day/night alternating temperatures (25–20 ± 1 °C) and a 12-h photoperiod (fluorescent lamps providing 30 μmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetic photon flux density PPFD). The germinated seeds were then counted (more than 1000) and the seedlings transferred to ½ MS medium [65] with macro-nutrients at half strength and without sucrose but supplemented with 20 μg mL−1 benomyl and gelified with 1.0% agar at pH 5.8 (before autoclaving). The seedlings were then placed in a growth chamber (model MA403, Marconi, Brazil) with alternating temperatures (25–20 ± 1 °C) and a 12-h photoperiod (fluorescent lamps providing 30 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD).
The following treatments were established at 820 days post-germination: control—nine healthy seedlings placed individually in glass jars containing 50 mL ½ MS medium (pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min) gelified with 1.0% agar and without sucrose and supplemented with 20 μg mL−1 benomyl; Treatment #1—nine seedlings placed individually in glass jars containing 50 mL ½ MS medium gelified with 1.0% agar without sucrose and supplemented with 20 μg mL−1 benomyl with the addition of 1.0 μM IAA (Sigma-Aldrich); Treatment #2—nine healthy seedlings inoculated with two drops of 1.0 μM IAA in the region of the tank; Treatment #3—nine seedlings placed on the same medium with the addition of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from yeast filtrate; and Treatment #4—nine seedlings inoculated with two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds from yeast filtrate in the region of the tank. After inoculation in a horizontal laminar flow cabinet, the seedlings were placed in a growth chamber (model MA403, Marconi, Brazil) with alternating day/night temperatures (25–20 ± 1 °C) and a 12-h photoperiod (fluorescent lamps providing 30 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD) for 6 months.
The effects of IAA-producing yeast on the growth parameters of V. minarum seedlings before and 6 months after the treatments were measured by fresh mass (FM), leaf number (LN), and lateral bud number (LB). The relative growth rate (RGR) was estimated using leaf number and the equation [66]: RGR = (ln (LNf) – ln (LNi))/t, where LNf is final leaf number, LNi is initial leaf number, and t is time after the application of each treatment, which is equal to 6 months. Percentage biomass (%) accumulated by seedlings after the application of the treatments was calculated using the equation: ((FWf – FWi)/FWi)/100, where FWf is final fresh weight and FWi is initial fresh weight.
Chlorophyll pigments were extracted from three leaves of each seedling (five replicates) using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb), total chlorophyll (ChlT), and carotenoids (Ck) were quantified per fresh weight (FW), essentially as described by Wellburn [67]. Photosynthetic performance was assessed by measurements of chlorophyll a fluorescence for each individual seedling using a PAM chlorophyll fluorometer (MINI-PAM, Walz, Germany). Potential quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) after 30 min of adaptation to dark [68] was calculated as Fv/Fm (Fv = Fm − F0), where Fm is maximum fluorescence and F0 is the basal level of fluorescence in dark-adapted leaves. Instantaneous light response curves for leaves were also produced with a modulated fluorescence meter (MINI-PAM, Walz). The parameters obtained from the instantaneous light response curves were determined over a 4-min period, with increasing levels of light in stages of 30 s each. A saturating light pulse was applied at the end of each light level stage to determine fluorescence parameters, which were used to estimate the maximum electron transport rate at light saturation (ETRmax); PPFD at 90% of ETRmax (PPFD90%) according to Rascher et al. [69].
Statistical analyses
Assumptions for parametric analyses were tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett tests [70]. Significant differences in RGR, biomass percentage (%), pigment contents, Fv/Fm, ETRmax, and PFFD90% were determined through one-way ANOVA. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the treatments were evaluated using the multiple scale HSD Tukey test. All analyses were performed using Statistica 6.0 software.
Results and discussion
Yeast isolated from the tank of V. minarum with PGP activities
A total of 79 yeast isolates from the water tanks of V. minarum—representing 30 species, 17 basidiomycetous, and 13 ascomycetous—were tested for some PGP abilities. Of all the assayed yeast isolates, 67.8% (46 out of 68) mobilized inorganic phosphate from the substrates; 40.0% (30 out of 75) secreted siderophores; and 89.9% (71 out of 79) synthetized IAA and IAA-like compounds when grown in the presence of L-Tryptophan (Trp) (Table 1). Direct and indirect PGP abilities were displayed by isolates belonging to different groups (Table 1): a relative high percentage of the basidiomycetous yeast isolates were able to solubilize phosphate (97.4%), while the greatest number (17 out of 35, 48.6%) of siderophore producers were ascomycetous. Isolates positive for IAA and IAA-like molecules were similarly distributed among basidiomycetous (37/43, 86.0%) and ascomycetous (34/36, 94.4%) yeasts. All yeast isolates exhibited at least one of the PGP traits tested (Table 2), and numerous had more than one: for basidiomycetous yeast, 47.6% exhibited two and 28.6% exhibited three, while for ascomycetous yeast, 50.0% exhibited two and 27.8% exhibited three.
Table 1.
Plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits of yeast isolates for the Basidiomycetous and Ascomycetous groups
| PGP traits | Groups | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basidiomycetous | Ascomycetous | |||
| Phosphate | Solubilizers | 37 | 21 | 46 |
| Non-solubilizers | 1 | 9 | 22 | |
| Total | 38 | 30 | 68 | |
| % solubilizers | 97.4 | 70.0 | 67.8 | |
| IAA | Producers | 37 | 34 | 71 |
| Non-producers | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Total | 43 | 36 | 79 | |
| % producers | 86.0 | 94.4 | 89.9 | |
| Siderophore | Producers | 13 | 17 | 30 |
| Non-producers | 27 | 18 | 45 | |
| Total | 40 | 35 | 75 | |
| % producers | 32.5 | 48.6 | 40.0 | |
Table 2.
Plant growth–promoting (PGP) traits of yeasts isolated from the tank of Vriesea minarum: indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production in the presence and absence of L-Tryptophan (L-Trp), phosphate solubilization (Pho.), and siderophore production (Sid.). IAA results are minimum and maximum values; solubilization index (SI) is the minimum and maximum diameter of the entire clear zone/diameter of the zone with yeast colonies; Sid. Results are numbers of isolates tested (in parenthesis) positive and negative for production. All isolates were deposited in the Collection of Microorganisms and Cells of Federal University of Minas Gerais (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Coleção de Microrganismos e Células, UFMG-CM), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| Species (Isolates) |
Number of isolates tested | IAA (μg mL−1) presence L-Trp |
IAA (μg mL−1) absence L-Trp |
Pho. (SI) |
Sid. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anomalomyces panici (UFMG-CM-Y6686, -Y6687, -Y6688) |
3 | 17.6–77.7 | 0–10.5 | 1.19–1.41 | +(1) –(2) |
|
Aureobasidium pullulans (UFMG-CM-Y6689, -Y6690, -Y6691, -Y6692) |
4 | 0–18.5 | 0 | 0 | +(2) –(2) |
|
Candida intermedia (UFMG-CM-Y6693) |
1 | 34.1 | 1.26 | 1.43 | –(1) |
|
Candida melibiosica (UFMG-CM-Y6694, -Y6695, -Y6696) |
3 | 21.7–41.0 | 0–1.7 | 1.25–1.33 | +(3) |
|
Candida membranifaciens (UFMG-CM-Y6697, -Y6698) |
2 | 0–38.0 | 0–1.6 | 0–1.20 | +(2) |
|
Candida ubatubensis (UFMG-CM-Y6702) |
1 | 60.8 | 9.1 | 1.13 | +(1) |
|
Carlosrosaea vrieseae (UFMG-CM-Y6722, -Y6723, -Y6724, -Y379, -Y380, -Y398) |
6 | 0–76.1 | 0–12.2 | 1.24–1.47 | +(6) |
|
Colacogloea sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6382) |
1 | 8.9 | 0 | 1.9 | –(1) |
|
Dioszegia sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6739) |
1 | 9.6 | 1.9 | 1.11 | –(1) |
|
Fellomyces penicillatus (UFMG-CM-Y6740) |
1 | 11.1 | 0 | 1.28 | +(1) |
|
Hannaella pagnoccae (UFMG-CM-Y175) |
1 | 11.9 | 0 | 1.18 | –(1) |
|
Kazachstania rupicola (UFMG-CM-Y6703) |
1 | 106.5 | 5.38 | 0 | +(1) |
|
Kockovaella libkindii (UFMG-CM-Y6053) |
1 | 4.7 | 0 | 0 | –(1) |
|
Kodamaea ohmeri (UFMG-CM-Y6704, -Y6705, -Y6706) |
3 | 11.8–61.6 | 0–4.6 | 0–1.38 | +(1) –(2) |
|
Meira sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6741, -Y6742, -Y6743) |
3 | 0–15.2 | 0 | 1.33–1.37 | +(2) –(1) |
|
Metschnikowia koreensis (UFMG-CM-Y6707, -Y6708, -Y6709) |
3 | 14.3–20.8 | 0 | 1.34–1.64 | +(3) |
|
Meyerozyma guilliermondii (UFMG-CM-Y6719, -Y6720, -Y6721) |
3 | 12.8–23.4 | 0 – 1.3 | 0 | +(2) –(1) |
|
Meyerozyma sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6710, -Y6711, -Y6712) |
3 | 11.0–35.6 | 0–1.9 | 1.21–1.38 | +(1) –(2) |
|
Myriangium sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6713, -Y6714, -Y6715, -Y6716, -Y6717, -Y6718) |
6 | 0.9–73.6 | 0–5.6 | 0–1.22 | –(6) |
|
Occultifur brasiliensis (UFMG-CM-Y6744, -Y6745, -Y6746) |
3 | 5.5–58.9 | 0 | 1.1–1.2 | +(1) –(2) |
|
Papiliotrema flavescens (UFMG-CM-Y6725, -Y6726, -Y6727, -Y6728) |
5 | 0–11.2 | 0–1.8 | 0 | +(4) –(1) |
|
Papiliotrema laurentii (UFMG-CM-Y6729, -Y6730, -Y6731) |
3 | 9.3–14.8 | 0–4.6 | 1.18–1.40 | +(1) –(2) |
|
Papiliotrema nemorosus (UFMG-CM-Y6732) |
1 | 48.6 | 4.6 | 1.61 | +(1) |
|
Papiliotrema rajasthanensis (UFMG-CM-Y6736) |
1 | 99.0 | 1.3 | 1.19 | +(1) |
|
Papiliotrema sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6737, -Y6738) |
2 | 0–13.7 | 0 | 0 – 1.16 | –(2) |
|
Pattersoniomyces tillandsiae (UFMG-CM-Y6749) |
1 | 17.2 | 0 | 1.75 | –(1) |
|
Rhodosporidium diabovatum (UFMG-CM-Y6750, -Y6751, -Y6752, -Y6753, -Y6754) |
5 | 0–107.5 | 0–9.3 | 1.06–1.24 | +(1) –(4) |
|
Rhodotorula sp. (UFMG-CM-Y6755, -Y6756) |
2 | 5.9–20.0 | 0 | 1.40–1.58 | –(2) |
|
Saturnispora sylvae (UFMG-CM-Y6699, -Y6700, -Y6701) |
2 | 59.1–67.5 | 0–4.2 | 1.19–1.23 | –(2) |
|
Saitozyma podzolica (UFMG-CM-Y6733, -Y6734, -Y6735) |
3 | 15.9–73.9 | 0–5.1 | 1.24–1.46 | –(3) |
| Total isolates | 79 |
The IAA concentration ranged from 0.75 to 12.21 μg mL−1 when cultured in GYMP broth in the absence of exogenous Trp (Table 2). However, in the presence of Trp, IAA production increased to values ranging from 0.86 to 107.54 μg mL−1, with two isolates, Kazachstania rupicola (106.5 μg mL−1) and Rhodosporidium diabovatum (107.5 μg mL−1), producing higher concentrations than the other yeasts tested (Table 2). Our results support the presence of a Trp-independent IAA biosynthetic pathway for some yeasts, even if the values are low, which is consistent with other studies [44]. The yeasts varied greatly in their IAA production efficiencies [34–37, 39, 44]. Some of the studied genera, such as Candida and Rhodotorula [48]; Hannaella, Papiliotrema (synonym Cryptococcus), and Rhodosporidium [38, 71]; and Aureobasidium, Meyerozyma, Pseudozyma, and Kazachstania [44], have been previously reported as IAA-producing at different levels, inter- and intraspecifically. Nevertheless, there have been no studies on the diversity of yeast with IAA-producing abilities in bromeliads of the CR ecosystem or even in Brazil for that matter.
Metschnikowia koreensis, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Rhodotorula sp., and Saitozyma podzolica had the highest solubilization index (SI) for solubilizing inorganic P. Yeasts of the genus Rhodotorula have been previously cited as good phosphate solubilizers [43, 51]. We believed that phosphate-solubilizing yeast isolates could play an important role in providing supplemental P for V. minarum. The solubilization of phosphate-bearing inorganic materials by microorganisms would seem to be an attractive solution for fertilizing the soil, and several yeasts have already been identified for their ability to mobilize insoluble inorganic P, including other sources Ca, Fe, and rock phosphates [51, 53, 72–74].
Kazachstania rupicola and some isolates of the genera Anomalomyces, Aureobasidium, Candida, Carlosrosaea, Kodamaea, Meira, Metschnikowia, Meyerozyma, Occultifur, and Papiliotrema were positive for siderophore production (Table 2). Microbial siderophores are known to provide plants with metals, especially Fe, which favors growth when Fe bioavailability is low [75]. According to Ahmed and Holmström [55], microbial siderophores with high redox potential can be reduced to donate Fe (II) to the transport system of the plant or can chelate Fe from the soil and then undergo a ligand exchange with phytosiderophores. However, this mechanism depends on several parameters, including the stability constants and concentrations of both microbial and phytosiderophores, and the pH and redox conditions of the root environment [75]. In addition, the production of siderophores makes Fe unavailable for pathogen growth and thus is critical for promoting plant health [44]. The depletion of Fe results in pathogen failure, since Fe is essential for the growth of almost all living microorganisms because it acts as a catalyst in enzymatic processes, oxygen metabolism, electron transfer, and DNA and RNA synthesis [55, 76].
Tank bromeliads facilitate the availability and redistribution of nutrients through the aquatic microecosystems they form, in particular through litter decomposition in the tank [77]. Gomes et al. [15] demonstrated the production of enzymes by the same yeast species of the present study, including protease, xylanase, amylase, pectinase, and cellulase. These enzymes can increase carbon and nitrogen availability, and, because of the presence of phosphate solubilizer and siderophore producer yeasts, other nutrients, such as P, Ca, Mg, and Fe, can be made available for the microbial food web living the tank of V. minarum, as well as for bromeliad nutrition by LATs. Thus, due to the maintenance of diverse aquatic food webs, tank bromeliads can easily establish themselves in nutrient-poor habitats [11, 78], which may be very important for V. minarum because of its association with the nutrient-poor habitats of CR.
The role that yeasts play in plant growth is still not very clear, but studies suggest that they have potential as biological PGP agents [50, 58]. Among the species studied, we highlight C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 because it produced more than 10 μg mL−1 IAA in the absence of exogenous Trp and 76.1 μg mL−1 IAA in its presence. In addition, this isolate solubilizes phosphate and produces siderophores. Plant growth depends on the production of different types of hormones and enzymes that directly influence plant growth and productivity. Besides IAA, cytokinin, and other hormones, plants require certain micro- and macro-nutrients, such as phosphate, potassium, zinc, manganese, and iron [50]. The potential role of C. vrieseae as biofertilizer for bromeliads will be discussed in the next session.
Effects of IAA-like producing C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 yeast on bromeliad growth and development
Six months of cultivation of V. minarum seedlings in medium supplemented with IAA or IAA-like compounds produced by yeast resulted in an increase in relative growth rate (RGR) compared to the control (ANOVA, F = 2.689, P = 0.0487) (Table 3). The leaf number was also greater independent of the auxin type used to increase RGR. The supplementation of cultivation medium with IAA-like compounds from filtrates of C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 (Treatment #3) accelerated lateral bud outgrowth (Table 3, Fig. 1). Unlike this treatment, the same exogenous concentration of IAA for other treatment types did not produce this response. No significant differences were found for the accumulation of biomass by V. minarum seedlings (Table 3).
Table 3.
Effect of IAA on relative growth rate (RGR, leaf number. months−1), lateral bud number (LB), and percentage biomass (fresh weight, FW) accumulated in seedlings of Vriesea minarum: ½ MS medium without indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (control); Treatment #1, 1.0 μM IAA; Treatment # 2, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA; Treatment #3, 1.0 μM auxin-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724; and Treatment #4, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724
| Treatments | RGR | LB | FW (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.061 ± 0.01a | 0.0 | 200.0 ± 31.8a |
| 1 | 0.089 ± 0.03b | 0.0 | 198.9 ± 52.3a |
| 2 | 0.071 ± 0.02b | 0.0 | 188.3 ± 52.7a |
| 3 | 0.105 ± 0.034b | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 188.8 ± 46.5a |
| 4 | 0.091 ± 0.03b | 0.0 | 141.6 ± 29.2a |
Values indicate the mean ± standard deviation of independent experiments carried out with five replicates. Distinct letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey; P < 0.05)
Fig. 1.
Morphological aspects of shoots of V. minarum seedlings in vitro. (A) ½ MS medium without indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (control); (B) Treatment #1, 1.0 μM IAA; (C) Treatment # 2, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA; (D) Treatment #3, 1.0 μM auxin-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724; and (E) Treatment #4, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds. Arrow = lateral bud
Many yeast genera and/or species found in the rhizosphere of other plant species are present in the tanks of V. minarum. Rhizosphere yeasts that produce IAA have been able to improve the growth of several crops, such as Sporobolomyces roseus promoting wheat yield by 16–30% [79]; a Rhodotorula sp. isolate increased tomato growth and fruit yield [80]; soil inoculation with Candida valida (= Pichia membranifaciens), Rhodotorula glutinis, and Trichosporon asahii, singly or in combination, has been reported to promote sugar beet growth [81]; isolates of Williopsis saturnus (= Cyberlindnera saturnus), an endophyte of maize and producer of IAA, promoted corn growth (shoot and root) in greenhouse trials [34]; Candida tropicalis (CtHY), also an IAA producer, promoted a 35% increase in root dry mass of rice [35]; and Torulaspora globosa, a rhizosphere yeast for the development of lettuce (cv. Crocantela) [40]. Although the roots of V. minarum purely function in mechanical support, and the LATs of the tank are responsible nutrient uptake in the adult phase, the roots can have an absorptive function in the early stages of development of the seedling, when the yeasts can play an important role as well.
No studies can be found involving the addition of yeast compounds to culture medium to evaluate their specificity related to growth promotion of bromeliad species. The effects of the compounds produced by the yeast C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 on seedling growth of V. minarum evaluated in this study as a PGP were positive because the RGR of seedlings was remarkably higher than the control (Table 3). However, other mechanisms have yet to be evaluated, such as the production of other plant hormones (e.g., cytokinins – CK) and other secondary metabolites (e.g., ethylene gas) that may stimulate plant development. IAA, gibberellins (GA), and CK are considered secondary metabolites of fungi, being excreted by microorganisms near the end of the growth phase or during the stationary phase [82–84].
Bromeliad seedlings in medium with IAA-like compounds produced by yeast showed notable outgrowth of lateral buds. Van Dijck et al. [85] showed that in vitro propagation of two species of Aechmea could be achieved through lateral bud shoot growth in MS medium containing both cytokinin (6-benzylaminopurine, BAP) and IAA. Furthermore, BAP and IAA were found to synergistically stimulate the production of ethylene by the cultured plants. The stimulation of ethylene production was correlated with lateral bud outgrowth, but CK was concluded to be essential for lateral bud outgrowth of Aechmea in vitro. The increase of outgrowth of lateral buds is more related to the presence of cytokinins than IAA. The CK used most often to break the apical dominance of in vitro bromeliads is BAP [86, 87]. It is also known that cytokinins and auxins have a synergistic effect on the de novo synthesis of ACC synthase. ACC synthase controls the conversion of s-denosyl-methionine (SAM) to ACC, the precursor of ethylene [88, 89]. CK are organic molecules that promote plant growth through facilitated cellular division and growth and ethylene is synthesized from methionine in many tissues in response to stress [90]. Although the present study did not quantify the production of CK by the yeast C. vrieseae, other studies indicate that yeasts can produce several types of this phytohormone [84, 91]. Zeatin production, the most common CK and like other adenine-derived cytokinins, was detected among basidiomycetous and ascomycetous yeast species [84]. The environmental conditions of conventional in vitro culture consist of sealed containers with high relative humidity, reduced gas exchange, and artificial temperature and luminosity conditions [92]. High variation in CO2 and ethylene accumulation may occur inside containers during the day [93, 94]. Another speculation is that supra optimal IAA concentrations stimulate ethylene production by enhancing ACC synthase activity [95].
The micro-environment inside sealed containers can cause physiological and anatomical disorders in plants [93, 96], including impaired stomatal functionality and changes in the performance of the photosynthetic apparatus [97–100]. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was similar for all treatments in relation to the control (P > 0.05) with an average of 0.7 (Fig. 2), except for Treatment #2, clearly indicating an alteration in efficiency of the photosystems in the use of light (< 0.7). The analysis of light dependence curves indicated significant differences in ETRmax and PPFD90% for Treatment #2 (Fig. 3), which had the lowest average absolute value of total chlorophyll (Table 4). Martins et al. [101] demonstrated that the suitable application of auxins (e.g., 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, NAA) can improve the performance of the photosynthetic apparatus of micropropagated plants. However, the in vitro condition can result in low photosynthetic activity of plants and is considered to be one of the major limiting factors of micropropagation efficiency [102]. This may also induce other physiological alterations and anatomical disorders in plants cultivated in vitro, such as decreased photosynthetic pigment content and poor leaf tissue function [92, 94, 103]. In the present study, the application of droplets of IAA in the bromeliad tank and not in the culture medium seemed to be prejudicial to photosynthesis with effects on growth. This result may be important for in vitro cultivation of this species and deserves to be well studied, since the use of a drop with yeast filtrate did not have this effect. In nature, adult plants absorb nutrients that are available in their tank through LATs and, probably, exogenous hormones produced by microorganisms.
Fig. 2.

Maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) of V. minarum seedlings immediately after their removal from culture medium after incubation for 6 months under alternating temperatures (25–20 ± 1 °C) and a 12-h photoperiod at 30 μmol m−2 s−1 PPF. (A) ½ MS medium without indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (control); (B) Treatment #1, 1.0 μM IAA; (C) Treatment # 2, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA; (D) Treatment #3, 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724; and (E) Treatment #4, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds. Each data bar represents a mean ± SE of nine seedlings. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey; P < 0.05)
Fig. 3.

Maximum apparent electron transport rates (ETRmax - black squares) and photosynthetic photon flux density at 90% of ETRmax (bars = PPFD90%) of V. minarum seedlings immediately after their removal from culture medium after incubation for 6 months under alternating temperatures (25–20 ± 1 °C) and a 12-h photoperiod at 30 μmol m−2 s−1 PPF. (A) ½ MS medium without indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (control); (B) Treatment #1, 1.0 μM IAA; (C) Treatment # 2, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA; (D) Treatment #3, 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from yeast filtrated of Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724; and (E) Treatment #4, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds. Each data bar and square represent a mean ± SE of nine seedlings. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey; P < 0.05)
Table 4.
Effects of IAA on chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll (Chl a, Chl b, ChlT, respectively), and carotenoids (Ck) in seedlings of Vriesea minarum: ½ MS medium without indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (control); Treatment #1, 1.0 μM IAA; Treatment #2, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA; Treatment #3, 1.0 μM auxin-like compounds (expressed as IAA equivalents) from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724; and Treatment #4, two drops of 1.0 μM IAA-like compounds from filtrate of the yeast Carlosrosaea vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724
| Treatments | Chl b (μg g−1 FW) |
Chl a (μg g−1 FW) |
ChlT (μg g−1 FW) |
Chl a/b | Ck (μg g−1 FW) |
Ck/ChlT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 77.2 ± 19.1bc | 141.5 ± 34.9bc | 218.7 ± 54.0bc | 1.83 | 12.0 ± 3.8bc | 0.0542 |
| 1 | 154.7 ± 20.6a | 283.5 ± 37.8a | 438.2 ± 58.5a | 1.83 | 23.8 ± 3.7ab | 0.0543 |
| 2 | 94.1 ± 38.8b | 172.4 ± 71.1b | 266.5 ± 49.7b | 1.83 | 19.1 ± 3.9b | 0.0567 |
| 3 | 111.0 ± 24.7b | 203.2 ± 45.1b | 314.2 ± 69.8b | 1.83 | 17.7 ± 3.6b | 0.0566 |
| 4 | 121.6 ± 35.3b | 222.6 ± 64.6b | 344.2 ± 99.9b | 1.83 | 17.2 ± 3.3b | 0.0511 |
Values indicate the mean ± SD of five replicates. Distinct letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Tukey; P < 0.05)
The highest chlorophyll a content was observed in seedlings that were kept for 6 months in medium supplemented with 1.0 μM IAA—Treatment #1 (Table 4). Total chlorophyll content was 438.2 ± 58.5 μg g−1 FW and carotenoids content was 23.8 ± 3.7 μg g−1 FW for seedlings from this treatment, which was significantly higher than the auxin-free treatment. According to Mshelmbula et al. [104], the effect of IAA on chlorophyll content in leaves of rice under watering was increased synthesis. Some key components in the light signaling pathway, such as PIFs and HY5, connect light signals to the signaling pathways of multiple phytohormones, including ethylene, GA, and CK [105]. The present study found no significant differences in Chl a/b and Ck/ChlT ratios among treatments (Table 3). Thus, the present study showed that the application of IAA directly on the leaves of V. minarum seedlings, in contrast to being applied in the culture medium, affected photosystem II and the total chlorophyll content both significantly lower.
The present study emphasizes the high level and diversity of PGPY abilities in the tank of the bromeliad V. minarum. Kazachstania rupicola and R. diabovatum were the best IAA producers among the yeast species studied, while C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 is highlighted for producing IAA in the absence and presence of exogenous Trp, solubilizing phosphate and producing siderophores. The addition of IAA and IAA-like compounds produced by C. vrieseae UFMG-CM-Y6724 equally improved the growth of V. minarum seedlings. The results of the present study demonstrate that the use of yeast filtrate containing auxin can improve the micropropagation of the studied bromeliad. The use of yeast in agriculture is currently an active area of research. The ecological benefits of yeast need to be explored and may provide a breakthrough for the bromeliad micropropagation and conservation sector. We believe that yeasts are vital for the establishment and development of bromeliads with ecological strategies like those of V. minarum. Understanding the diversity of microorganisms inhabiting bromeliad tanks has both ecological and economic importance since this information could be useful in the management and conservation of the bromeliads themselves.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Department of Microbiology of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais and Department of Biological Sciences of Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais for research facilities and for supporting A.R.M' post-doctorate that generated the results of the article. The authors are also thankful for the support from the agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) grant no CBB - APQ-02639-15.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author contribution
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analyses were performed by Andrea R. Marques, Alessandra Abrão Resende, Alexandre Aparecido Duarte, and Ana Raquel O. Santos. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Andrea R. Marques, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) grant no CBB - APQ-02639-15.
Data Availability
The ecological datasets in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval
Permissions for collection according to ICMBio instructions. Document 57088-1 was registered by AA Resende in SISBIO and document 097/2015 was registered by AA Resende in IEF/MG as authorization for collection of seeds samples for scientific activities.
Consent to participate
All authors agreed with the content and gave explicit consent to submit and obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute where the work has been carried out.
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Luther HE. An alphabetical list of bromeliad binomials. 13. Sarasota: Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, Bromeliad Society International; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Govaerts R, Luther HE, Grant J (2012) World checklist of Bromeliaceae. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/.
- 3.Ulloa CU, Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Beck S, Belgrano MJ, Bernal R, Berry PE, Brako L, Celis M, Davidse G, Forzza RC, Gradstein SR, Hokche O, León B, León-Yánez S, Magill RE, Neill DA, Nee M, Raven PH, Stimmel H, Strong MT, Villaseñor JL, Zarucchi JL, Zuloaga FO, Jørgensen PM. An integrated assessment of the vascular plant species of the Americas. Science. 2017;358:1614–1617. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Givnish TJ, Barfuss MHJ, Van EB, Riina R, Schulte K, Horres R, Gonsiska PA, Jabaily RS, Crayn DM, Smith JAC, Winter K, Brown GK, Evans TM, Holst BK, Luther H, Till W, Zizka G, Berry PE, Sytsma KJ. Phylogeny, adaptive radiation and historical biogeography in Bromeliaceae: insights from an eight-locus plastid phylogeny. Am J Bot. 2011;98:872–895. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Versieux LM, Wendt T. Bromeliaceae diversity and conservation in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv. 2007;16:2989–3009. doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9157-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Versieux LM, Louzada RB, Viana PL, Mota N, Wanderley MGL. An illustrated checklist of Bromeliaceae from Parque Estadual do Rio Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil, with notes on phytogeography and one new species of Cryptanthus. Phytotaxa. 2010;10:1–16. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.10.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bitencourt C, Rapini A, Damascena LS, Junior PM. The worrying future of the endemic flora of a tropical mountain range under climate change. Flora. 2016;218:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2015.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Conceição AA, Pirani JR. Succession on the rocky outcrop vegetation: a rupestrian grassland scheme. In: Fernandes GW, editor. Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil, chapter 9. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 181–206. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schaefer CE, Corrêa GR, Candido HG, Arruda DM, Nunes JA, Araújo RW, Rodrigues PMS, Filho EIF, Pereira AFS, Brandão PC, Neri AV. The physical environment of rupestrian grasslands (Campos Rupestres) in Brazil: geological, geomorphological and pedological characteristics, and interplays. In: Fernandes GW, editor. Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil, chapter 2. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 15–53. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Silveira FAO, Negreiros D, Barbosa NP, Buisson E, Carmo FF, Carstensen D, Conceição AA, Cornelissen TG, Echternacht L, Fernandes GW, Garcia QS, Guerra TJ, Jacobi CM, Lemos-Filho JP, Schaefer CE, Viana P, Lambers H. Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: a neglected conservation priority. Plant Soil. 2016;403:129–152. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2637-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leroy C, Carrias JF, Céréghino R, Corbara B. The contribution of microorganisms and metazoans to mineral nutrition in bromeliads. J Plant Ecol. 2016;9:241–255. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtv052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.CNCFlora (2013) Lista Vermelha de Espécies. http://cncflora.jbrj.gov.br/portal.
- 13.Lavor P, van Den Berg C, Jacobi CM, Carmo FF, Versieux LM. Population genetics of the endemic and endangered Vriesea minarum (Bromeliaceae) in the Iron Quadrangle, Espinhaço range, Brazil. Am J Bot. 2014;101:1167–1175. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1300388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Males J. Think tank: water relations of Bromeliaceae in their evolutionary context. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181:415–440. doi: 10.1111/boj.12423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gomes FCO, Safar SVB, Marques AR, Medeiros AO, Santos ARO, Carvalho C, Lachance MA, Sampaio JP, Rosa CA. The diversity and extracellular enzymatic activities of yeasts isolated from water tanks of Vriesea minarum, an endangered bromeliad species in Brazil, and the description of Occultifur brasiliensis f.a., sp. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107(2):597–611. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0356-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Safar SVB, Gomes FCO, Marques AR, Lachance MA, Rosa CA. Kazachstania rupicola sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from water tanks of a bromeliad in Brazil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1165–1168. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.048462-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Landell MF, Brandão LR, Barbosa AC, Ramos JP, Safar SVB, Gomes FCO, Sousa FMP, Morais PB, Broetto L, Leoncini O, Ribeiro JR, Fungsin B, Takashima M, Nakase T, Lee CF, Vainstein MH, Fell JW, Scorzetti G, Vishnia HS, Rosa CA, Valente P. Hannaella pagnoccae sp. nov., a tremellaceous yeast species isolated from plants and soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1970–1977. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059345-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Landell MF, Brandão LR, Safar SVB, Gomes FCO, Félix CR, Santos ARO, Pagani DM, Ramos JP, Broetto L, Mott T, Vainstein MH, Valente P, Rosa CA. Bullera vrieseae sp. nov., a tremellaceous yeast species isolated from bromeliads. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:2466–2471. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu XZ, Wang QM, Göker M, Groenewald M, Kachalkin AV, Lumbsch HT, Millanes AM, Wedin M, Yurkov AM, Boekhout T, Bai FY. Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes. Stud Mycol. 2015;81:85–147. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gomes FCO, Safar SVB, Santos ARO, Lachance MA, Rosa CA. Kockovaella libkindii sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from water tanks of bromeliad. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:5066–5069. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Piątek M, Lutz M, Sousa FMP, Santos ARO, Félix CR, Landell MF, Gomes FCO, Rosa CA. Pattersoniomyces tillandsiae gen. et comb. nov.: linking sexual and asexual morphs of the only known smut fungus associated with Bromeliaceae. Org Divers Evol. 2017;17:531–543. doi: 10.1007/s13127-017-0340-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ruivo CCC, Lachance MA, Rosa CA, Bacci MJ, Pagnocca F. Candida bromeliacearum sp. nov. and Candida ubatubensis sp. nov., two yeast species isolated from the water tanks of Canistropsis seidelli (Bromeliaceae) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:2213–2217. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63698-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Landell MF, Inácio J, Fonseca A, Vainstein MH, Valente P. Cryptococcus bromeliarum sp. nov., an orange-coloured basidiomycetous yeast isolated from bromeliads in Brazil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:910–913. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.005652-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Landell MF, Billodre R, Ramos JP, Leoncini O, Vainstein MH, Valente P. Candida aechmeae sp. nov. and Candida vrieseae sp. nov., novel yeast species isolated from the phylloplane of bromeliads in Southern Brazil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:244–248. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.011577-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Araújo FV, Rosa CA, Freitas LFD, Lachance MA, Vaughan-Martini A, Mendonça-Hagler LC, Hagler AN. Kazachstania bromeliacearum sp. nov., a yeast species from water tanks of bromeliads. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:1002–1006. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.031633-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sousa FMP, Morais PB, Lachance MA, Rosa CA. Hagleromyces gen. nov., a yeast genus in the Saccharomycetaceae, and description of Hagleromyces aurorensis sp. nov., isolated from water tanks of bromeliads. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:2915–2919. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.063883-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hagler AN, Mendonça-Hagler LC, Pagnocca FC. Yeasts in aquatic ecotone habitats. In: Buzzini P, Lachance MA, Yurkov A, editors. Yeasts in natural ecosystems: diversity. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 63–85. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morais PB, de Sousa FMP, Rosa CA. Yeast in plant phytotelmata: Is there a “core” community in different localities of rupestrian savannas of Brazil? Braz J Microbiol. 2020;51:1209–1218. doi: 10.1007/s42770-020-00286-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Navarro HMC, Félix CR, Paulino GVB, Almeida JH, Valente P, Landell MF. Richness and biotechnological potential of the yeast community associated with the bromeliad phylloplane in the Brazilian Neotropical Forest. Mycol Prog. 2020;19:1387–1401. doi: 10.1007/s11557-020-01631-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Inselsbacher E, Cambui CA, Richter A, Stange CF, Mercier H, Wanek W. Microbial activities and foliar uptake of nitrogen in the epiphytic bromeliad Vriesea gigantean. New Phytol. 2007;175:311–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tapia-Hernandez A, Bustillos-Cristales MR, Jimenez Salgado T, Caballero-Mellado J, Fuentes-Ramirez LE. Natural endophytic occurrence of Acetobacter diazotrophicus in pineapple plants. Microb Ecol. 2000;39:49–55. doi: 10.1007/s002489900190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Giongo A, Beneduzi A, Gano K, Vargas LK, Utz L, Passaglia LMP. Characterization of plant growth-promoting bacteria inhabiting Vriesea gigantean Gaud. and Tillandsia aeranthos (Loiseleur) L.B. Smith (Bromeliaceae) Biota Neotrop. 2013;13:80–85. doi: 10.1590/s1676-06032013000300010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khan AL, Waqas M, Kang SM, Al-Harrasi A, Hussain J, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Khiziri S, Ullah I, Ali L, Jung HY, Lee IJ. Bacterial endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 produces gibberellins and IAA and promotes tomato plant growth. Res J Microbiol. 2014;52:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12275-014-4002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nassar A, El-Tarabily K, Sivasithamparam K. Promotion of plant growth by an auxin-producing isolate of the yeast Williopsis saturnus endophytic in maize (Zea mays L.) roots. Biol Fertil Soils. 2005;42:97–108. doi: 10.1007/s00374-005-0008-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Amprayn K, Rose MT, Kecskés M, Pereg L, Nguyen HT, Kennedy IR. Plant growth promoting characteristics of soil yeast (Candida tropicalis HY) and its effectiveness for promoting rice growth. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;61:295–299. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sun PF, Fang WT, Shin LY, Wei JY, Fu SF, Chou JY. Indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts in the phyllosphere of the carnivorous plant Drosera indica L. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ignatova LV, Brazhnikova YV, Berzhanova RZ, Mukashev TD. Plant growth-promoting and antifungal activity of yeasts from darkchestnut soil. Microbiol Res. 2015;175:78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jaiboon K, Lertwattanasakul N, Limtong P, Limtong S. Yeasts from peat in a tropical peat swamp forest in Thailand and their ability to produce ethanol, indole-3-acetic acid and extracellular enzymes. Mycol Prog. 2016;15:755–770. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1205-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fu SF, Chen HW, Wei JY, Lee YI, Chou JY. Yeast-produced IAA is not only involved in the competition among yeast but also promotes plant growth and development. Nova Hedwigia. 2017;105:135–150. doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2016/0382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cabrini PG, Sala FC, Magri MMR. Torulaspora globosa: rhizosphere yeast promoting lettuce growth on seedlings and under field conditions. Hortic Bras. 2019;37:266–271. doi: 10.1590/S0102-053620190303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N. Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mundra S, Arora R, Stobdan T. Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novel temperature-, pH-, and salt-tolerant yeast, Rhodotorula sp. PS4, isolated from seabuckthorn rhizosphere, growing in cold desert of Ladakh, India. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:2387–2396. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0708-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nakayan P, Hameed A, Singh S, Young LS, Hung MH, Young CC. Phosphate-solubilizing soil yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii CC1 improves maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and minimizes requisite chemical fertilization. Plant Soil. 2013;373:301–315. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1792-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fu S-F, Sun P-F, Lu H-Y, Wei J-Y, Xiao H-S, Fang W-T, Cheng B-Y, Chou J-Y. Plant growth-promoting traits of yeasts isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Drosera spatulata Lab. Fungal Biol. 2016;120:433–448. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Oliveira TB, Junior RB, Silva LG, Rosa-Magri MM. Rhizosphere yeast Torulaspora globosa with plant growth promotion traits and improvement of the development of tomato seedlings under greenhouse conditions. Afr J Agric Res. 2019;14:935–942. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2019.13950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang W, Chi Z, Chi Z, Li J, Wang X. Siderophore production by the marine-derived Aureobasidium pullulans and its antimicrobial activity. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:2639–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cleland RE. Auxin and cell elongation. In: Davies PJ, editor. Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1990. pp. 132–148. [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Tarabily KA, Sivasithamparam K. Potential of yeasts as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Mycoscience. 2006;47:25–35. doi: 10.1007/s10267-005-0268-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mestre MC, Rosa CA, Safar SVB, Libkind D, Fontenla SB. Yeast communities associated with the bulk-soil, rhizosphere and ectomycorrhizosphere of a Nothofagus pumilio forest in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;78:531–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mukherjee A, Verma JP, Gaurav AK, Chouhan GK, Patel JS, Hesham AE-L. Yeast a potential bio-agent: future for plant growth and postharvest disease management for sustainable agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:1497–1510. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10321-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Narsian V, Samaha SM, Patel HH. Rock phosphate dissolution by specific yeast. Indian J Microbiol. 2010;50:57–62. doi: 10.1007/s12088-009-0019-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Botha A. The importance and ecology of yeasts in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kuo CY, Fu SF, Chou FC, Chen RY, Chou JY. Phosphate-solubilizing characteristics of yeasts. Mycosphere. 2018;9:1117–1131. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/9/6/4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ramos-Garza J, Bustamante-Brito R, de Paz GA, Medina-Canales MG, Vásquez-Murrieta MS, Wang ET, Rodríguez-Tovar AV. Isolation and characterization of yeasts associated with plants growing in heavy metal- and arsenic-contaminated soils. Can J Microbiol. 2016;62:307–319. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ahmed E, Holmström SJM. Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7:196–208. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yu X, Ai C, Xin L, Zhou G. The siderophore producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper. Eur J Soil Biol. 2011;47:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Verma VC, Singh SK, Prakash S. Bio-control and plant growth promotion potential of siderophore producing endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachta indica Juss. J Basic Microbiol. 2011;51:550–556. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ghosh SK, Bera T, Chakrabarty AM. Microbial siderophore- a boon to agricultural sciences. Biol Control. 2020;144:104214. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Marques AR, Lemos-Filho JP, Mota RC. Diversity and conservation status of bromeliads from Serra da Piedade, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rodriguésia. 2012;63:243–255. doi: 10.1590/S2175-78602012000200001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Oliveira CA, Alves VMC, Marriel IE, Gomes EA, Scotti MR, Carneiro NP, Guimarães CT, Schaffert RE, Sá NMH. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizosphere of maize cultivated in an oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado Biome. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;41:1782–1787. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pikovskaya RI (1948) Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 17:362–370
- 62.Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 63.Hu Q-P, Xu J-G (2011) A simple double-layered chrome azurol S agar (SD-CASA) plate assay to optimize the production of siderophores by a potential biocontrol agent Bacillus. Afr J Microbiol Res 5:4321–4327. 10.5897/AJMR11.238
- 64.Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195. 10.1104/pp.26.1.192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 65.Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
- 66.Huante P, Rincon E, Allen EB (1993) Effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on seedling growth of four tree species from the tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Mycorrhiza 2:141–145. 10.1007/BF00203860
- 67.Wellburn AR (1994) The Spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144:307–313. 10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81192-2
- 68.Lüttge U, Duarte HM, Scarano FR, Mattos EA, Cavalin PO, Franco AC, Fernandes GW. Physiological ecology of photosynthesis of five sympatric species of Velloziaceae in the rupestrian fields of Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Flora. 2007;202:637–646. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2006.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rascher U, Liebig M, Lüttge U. Evaluation of instant light response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field. Plant Cell Environ. 2000;23:1397–1405. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00650.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sileshi GW. A critique of current trends in the statistical analysis of seed germination and viability data. Seed Sci Res. 2012;22:145–159. doi: 10.1017/S0960258512000025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nutaratat P, Srisuk N, Arunrattiyakorn P, Limtong S. Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand. Fungal Biol. 2014;118(8):683–694. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hesham AE-L, Mohamed HM. Molecular genetic identification of yeast strains isolated from Egyptian soils for solubilization of inorganic phosphates and growth promotion of corn plants. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:55–61. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1006.06045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Posso EJS, Prager MS, Rojas CAC. Organic acids production by rhizosphere microorganisms isolated from a Typic Melanudands and its effects on the inorganic phosphates solubilization. Acta Agron. 2017;66:241–247. doi: 10.15446/acag.v66n2.56148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pandi R, Velu G, Devi P, Dananjeyan B. Isolation and screening of soil yeasts for plant growth promoting traits. Madras Agric J. 2019;106:439–443. doi: 10.29321/MAJ2019.000289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Crowley DA. Microbial siderophores in the plant rhizosphere. In: Barton LL, Abadía J, editors. Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Netherland: Springer; 2006. pp. 169–189. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Aguado-Santacruz GAA, Moreno-Gómez BA, Jiménez-Francisco BB, García-Moya EB, Preciado-Ortiz RE. Impact of the microbial siderophores and phytosiderophores on the iron assimilation by plants: a synthesis. Rev Fitotec Mex. 2012;35(1):9–21. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ladino G, Bautista FO, Varón JE, Jerabkova L, Kratina P. Ecosystem services provided by bromeliad plants: A systematic review. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:7360–7372. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Winkler U, Zotz G. Highly efficient uptake of phosphorus in epiphytic bromeliads. Ann Bot. 2009;103:477–484. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Perondi NL, Luz WC, Thomas R. Microbiological control of Gibberella in wheat. Fitopatol Bras. 1996;21:243–249. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Abd El-Hafez AE, Shehata SF. Field evaluation of yeasts as a biofertilizer for some vegetable crops. Arab Univ J Agric Sci. 2001;9:169–182. [Google Scholar]
- 81.El-Tarabily KA. Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani diseases of sugar beet by antagonistic and plant growth-promoting yeasts. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96:69–75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Seyìs Bìlkay I, Karakoç Ş, Aksöz N. Indole-3-acetic acid and gibberellic acid production in Aspergillus niger. Turk J Biol. 2010;34:313–318. doi: 10.3906/biy-0812-15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Waqas M, Khan AL, Kamran M, Hamayun M, Kang S-M, Kim Y-H, Lee I-J. Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules. 2012;17:10754–10773. doi: 10.3390/molecules170910754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Streletskii RA, Kachalkin AV, Glushakova AM, Yurkov AM, Vladimir VD. Yeasts producing zeatin. Peer J. 2019;7:e6474. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Van Dijck R, Proft M, Greef J. Role of ethylene and cytokinins in the initiation of lateral shoot growth in Bromeliads. Plant Physiol. 1988;86:836–840. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.3.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Souza TV, Thiesen JF, Guerra MP, Santos M. Morpho-and histo differentiation of shoot regeneration of Billbergia zebrine (Helbert) Lindley nodular cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016;127:393–403. doi: 10.1007/s11240-016-1061-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Simão MJ, Faria DV, Werner ET, Soares TCB, Gontijo ABPL. Induction of in vitro shoots of Billbergia euphemiae E. Morren (Bromeliaceae) from leaf explants. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 2016;38:207–213. doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i2.31694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lau OL, Yang SF. Mechanism of a synergistic effect of kinetin on auxin induced ethylene production: suppression of auxin-conjugation. Plant Physiol. 1973;51:1011–1014. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.6.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yoshii H, Imaseki H. Biosynthesis of auxin-induced ethylene, effects of indol-3-acetic acid, benzyladenine and abscisic acid on endogenous levels of 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) and ACC synthase. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:369–379. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Davies PJ. Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Morrison EN, Knowles S, Hayward A, Thorn RG, Saville BJ, Emery RJN. Detection of phytohormones in temperate forest fungi predicts consistent abscisic acid production and a common pathway for cytokinin biosynthesis. Mycologia. 2015;107:245–257. doi: 10.3852/14-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rodrigues SP, Picoli EAT, Oliveira DC, Carneiro RGS, Isaias RMS. The effects of in vitro culture on the leaf anatomy of Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae) Biosci J. 2014;30:1933–1941. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kozai T, Kubota C. Developing a photoautotrophic micropropagation system for woody plants. J Plant Res. 2001;114:525–537. doi: 10.1007/pl00014020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Martins JPR, Verdoodt V, Pasqual M, De Proft M. Impacts of photoautotrophic and photomixotrophic conditions on in vitro propagated Billbergia zebrina (Bromeliaceae) Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015;123:121–132. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0820-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Argueso CT, Hansen M, Kieber JJ. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis. J Plant Growth Regul. 2007;26:92–105. doi: 10.1007/s00344-007-0013-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Xiao Y, Niu G, Kozai T. Development and application of photoautotrophic micropropagation plant system. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2011;105:149–158. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9863-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Dobránszki J, Mendler-Drienyovszki N. Cytokinin-induced changes in the chlorophyll content and fluorescence of in vitro apple leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171:1472–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Martins JPR, Schmildt ER, Alexandre RS, Castro EM, Nani TF, Pires MF, Pasqual M. Direct organogenesis and leaf-anatomy modifications in vitro of Neoregelia concentrica (Vellozo) L.B. Smith (Bromeliaceae) Pak J Bot. 2014;46:2179–2187. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Martins JPR, Rodrigues LCA, Santos ER, Batista BG, Gontijo A, Falqueto AR. Anatomy and photosystem II activity of in vitro grown Aechmea blanchetiana as affected by 1-naphthaleneacetic acid. Biol Plant. 2018;62:211–221. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0781-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rosa WS, Martins JPR, Rodrigues ES, Rodrigues LCA, Gontijo ABPL, Falqueto AR. Photosynthetic apparatus performance in function of the cytokinins used during the in vitro multiplication of Aechmea blanchetiana (Bromeliaceae) Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2018;133:339–350. doi: 10.1007/s11240-018-1385-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Martins JPR, Santos ER, Rodrigues LCA, Gontijo A, Falqueto AR. Effects of 6- benzylaminopurine on photosystem II functionality and leaf anatomy of in vitro cultivated Aechmea blanchetiana. Biol Plant. 2018;62:793–800. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0822-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Yaseen M, Ahmad T, Sablok G, Standardi A, Hafiz IA. Review: role of carbon sources for in vitro plant growth and development. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:2837–2849. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2299-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Martins JPR, Verdoodt V, Pasqual M, De Proft M. Physiological responses by Billbergia zebrina (Bromeliaceae) when grown under controlled microenvironmental conditions. Afr J Biotechnol. 2016;15:1952–1961. doi: 10.5897/ajb2016.15584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Mshelmbula BP, Okooboh G, Mensah JK, Ikhajiagbe B, Zakariya R. The effects of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) on the growth and yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under drought conditions. Int J Sci Knowl. 2015;4:60–65. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Liu K, Newman M, Mclnroy JA, Hu CH, Kloepper JK. Selection and assessment of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria for biological control of multiple plant diseases. Phytopatology. 2017;107:928–936. doi: 10.1094/phyto-02-17-0051-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The ecological datasets in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

