Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jul 30;11:15520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95044-0

Boron rich nanotube drug carrier system is suited for boron neutron capture therapy

Fabian Heide 1,✉,#, Matthew McDougall 1,#, Candice Harder-Viddal 2, Roy Roshko 3, David Davidson 1, Jiandong Wu 4, Camila Aprosoff 1, Aniel Moya-Torres 1, Francis Lin 3, Jörg Stetefeld 1,
PMCID: PMC8324832  PMID: 34330984

Abstract

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a two-step therapeutic process that utilizes Boron-10 in combination with low energy neutrons to effectively eliminate targeted cells. This therapy is primarily used for difficult to treat head and neck carcinomas; recent advances have expanded this method to cover a broader range of carcinomas. However, it still remains an unconventional therapy where one of the barriers for widespread adoption is the adequate delivery of Boron-10 to target cells. In an effort to address this issue, we examined a unique nanoparticle drug delivery system based on a highly stable and modular proteinaceous nanotube. Initially, we confirmed and structurally analyzed ortho-carborane binding into the cavities of the nanotube. The high ratio of Boron to proteinaceous mass and excellent thermal stability suggest the nanotube system as a suitable candidate for drug delivery into cancer cells. The full physicochemical characterization of the nanotube then allowed for further mechanistic molecular dynamic studies of the ortho-carborane uptake and calculations of corresponding energy profiles. Visualization of the binding event highlighted the protein dynamics and the importance of the interhelical channel formation to allow movement of the boron cluster into the nanotube. Additionally, cell assays showed that the nanotube can penetrate outer membranes of cancer cells followed by localization around the cells’ nuclei. This work uses an integrative approach combining experimental data from structural, molecular dynamics simulations and biological experiments to thoroughly present an alternative drug delivery device for BNCT which offers additional benefits over current delivery methods.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Carrier proteins, Targeted therapies

Introduction

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a potentially promising treatment for malignant tumors1, especially for head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer and melanoma2,3. The technology is based on the nuclear capture reaction of thermal (low energy < 0.5 eV, limited depth of penetration) and epithermal neutrons (> 0.5 eV < 10 keV, greater depth of penetration) using nonradioactive 10B, which causes the production of a 7Li particle and an α particle with ~ 2.3 MeV thermal energy1,4. The high linear energy transfer of charged particles is accompanied by a short spatial trajectory of 5–10 µm, the approximate diameter of one cell. As a consequence, radiation damage is strictly confined to cells containing 10B particles minimizing damage on surrounding tissue. BNCT has thus been described as a two-step process which combines two low toxicity procedures, 10B delivery and activation by neutron radiation, to precisely eliminate the targeted cells.

For widespread adoption, several important questions remain to be addressed in the development of BNCT as a clinical treatment. First, a carrier is required that allows for the selectively delivery of the isotope 10B isotope to tumor cells. The fact that BNCT is a spatially limited non-invasive therapeutic approach is a major advantage of the technique. However, this implies that the boron compounds have to be placed either in close spatial vicinity to or, more preferably, inside the tumor cell to maximize dosage to the cell’s nucleus. Second, to ensure effective neutron radiation treatment, delivery amounts of > 20 µg 10B/ g tumor are required5. Additionally, delivery methods need to meet specific requirements such as high tumour/tissue uptake ratios, low toxicity and rapid clearance from the patient’s body1. Considerable research has been focused on developing carrier systems which are capable of targeting cancer cells for BNCT. These include lipid based nanocarriers6, inorganic nanoparticles79, drug conjugates10 and more recently, peptide based carrier systems11,12. In general, nanoparticles can offer certain advantages over non-conjugated compounds, such as overcoming drug solubility issues, increased chemical stability, decreased toxicity and improved distribution with potential tissue-specific targeting7. However, in order to present a novel nanoparticle for the use of drug delivery, the physicochemical properties have to be closely examined. Ideally, binding mechanisms and targeting are demonstrated which endorse further studies.

The development of effective targeting strategies and the sufficient upload of 10B isotopes are urgent problems in the area of BNCT research. Here, we present an unconventional drug delivery device entitled Right-Handed Coiled Coil-Nanotube (RHCC-NT) which is ideally suited to uptake boron clusters into its large internal cavities. In addition to binding small molecules, this nanotube can be internalized by eukaryotic cells, which offers possibilities for targeted drug delivery in BNCT. RHCC-NT was first described as an S-layer protein component of the archaea Staphylothermus marinus13. It has been shown to possess highly unusual properties in respect to cargo uptake1417, targeted drug delivery1820 and robustness13,21. Our study focuses on an integrated approach combining structural biology, biophysical and in vitro functional assays to characterize RHCC-NT on physicochemical and biological levels as a unique drug delivery system for targeted 10B delivery. In addition to this, mechanisms and free energy profiles were simulated by molecular dynamics simulations to understand the protein nanotube’s solution behaviour and ligand uptake into the cavities on a molecular level. Our data demonstrate that RHCC-NT can uptake o-carboranes, C2B10H12, and deliver them into tumor cells for the use in BNCT.

Materials and methods

Expression of RHCC-NT

The expression and purification methods of Right-Handed Coiled Coil Nanotube (RHCC-NT) have previously been described14. In summary, the RHCC-NT gene was cloned in a pET15b vector and transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Positive clones were selected with ampicillin and used to inoculate liquid LB ampicillin for protein production. His-tagged RHCC-NT expression was induced with Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. After expression of RHCC-NT, the cells were pelleted and re-suspended in binding buffer (20 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 5 mM Imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 8 M Urea) and kept on ice until cell lysis by sonication. Purification of the His-tagged RHCC-NT was achieved by affinity chromatography on Ni2+-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) as previously described13. The His-tag was removed by thrombin cleavage at 50 °C and RHCC-NT was purified by anion-exchange chromatography on a HiTrap Q Sepharose (GE Healthcare) column. Lastly, RHCC-NT was dialyzed into 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 154 mM NaCl and stored at 5 °C until further use.

Boron nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy

RHCC-NT was concentrated to 11.0 mg/mL in 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 154 mM NaCl using a Centrifugal Filter Concentrator, MWCO 3 kDa (Amicon) after which 2 mL of solution were incubated with 10 mg of o-carborane, C2B10H12 for 1 week at 50 °C. Additionally, control samples consisting of 2.5 mg o-carborane in 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0 154 mM NaCl and 2.5 mg o-carborane in toluene (100%, High Performance Liquid Chromatography grade) were prepared 18 h before NMR measurements. All samples were filtered through a 0.1 μm centrifuge filter tube serving the purpose to separate free o-carborane grains from the sample solution. 550 µL samples supplemented with 10% (v/v) deuterium oxide and 5 µM 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid were prepared, dispensed into a quartz NMR tube and measured in a Bruker Avance III 500 MHz NMR spectrometer at 25 °C utilizing a 5 mm room-temperature BBFO probe. 11B NMR spectra were collected with power-gated 1H decoupling acquiring 65,000 points, totaling 1024 transients per spectrum with a 2 s recycle delay. Spectra were processed in TopSpin 3.5 pl 6 (Bruker NMR Software) with removal of the first 44 points in each free induction decay (FID) and replacement via linear back-prediction based on 256 components in order to reduce 11B background signals from probe materials.

Dynamic light scattering

The size distributions of native RHCC-NT and RHCC-NT incubated with o-carborane were compared using dynamic light scattering for quality control (Figure S1). Protein contents were concentrated to 10 mg/mL using a Centrifugal Filter Concentrator, MWCO 3 kDa (Amicon). Samples were filtered through a 0.1 μm centrifuge filter tube after which particle size distributions of RHCC-NT samples were measured in triplicates at 20 °C using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90.

Further, the size distribution and thermal stability of RHCC-NT was measured over a thermal range from 20 to 95 °C using a NanoTemper Prometheus Panta (Figure S2/S3). Protein samples were measured in triplicates at 10 mg/mL protein concentration.

RHCC-NT carborane complex crystallization

RHCC-NT was incubated with o-carborane, C2B10H12 at 50 °C for 1 week after which the structural integrity was tested using Dynamic Light Scattering. RHCC-NT was dialyzed into 10 mM TRIS pH 7.5, 154 mM NaCl and concentrated to 10 mg/mL. Crystals were set up in a vapour diffusion crystallization experiment in 100 mM ammonium acetate (C2H7NO2), 50 mM sodium cacodylate trihydrate ((CH3)2AsO2Na·3H2O) pH 6.5, 10% 2-propanol (C3H8O), 15 mM magnesium acetate tetrahydrate ((CH3COO)2 Mg·4H2O). Rod shaped crystals formed after 1 week. Data was collected on a Rigaku rotating anode MM-007HF diffractometer with a wavelength of 1.54178 Å in 1° wedges at 100 K. Diffraction data was processed with XDS and the CCP4-package. Phases were calculated in Phaser using a RHCC-NT search model (PDB: 1YBK) and the o-carborane stereochemical restraints were generated using eLBOW (Phenix package). The structures were built manually and refined crystallographically using the Coot suite and the Phenix software package.

The crystallography data table can be found in the SI document (Table S1).

Molecular dynamics simulations

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed with the GROMACS molecular dynamics simulation package22 using the AMBER force field parm94, and the TIP3P water model. All simulations were performed on a RHCC-NT-o-carborane (C2B10H12) complex in which all four cavities were simultaneously occupied by a single carborane molecule. The complex was formed by inserting a modeled structure of an o-carborane molecule into each cavity of the measured structure of an RHCC-NT tetramer (PDB code 1FE6)13 which was crystallized at T = 298 K. The Amber 99 force field parameters for o-carborane were obtained from literature2325. Each RHCC-NT complex was solvated in water and Na+ ions to neutralize the system. The measured structure was energy minimized using the method of steepest descent. Potential pathways for the shuttling of o-carborane between one of the cavities of RHCC-NT and the solvent were identified using the combined methods of steered molecular dynamics2630 and umbrella sampling3133.

Additional details can be found in the SI document (Table S2).

RHCC-NT cell assays

RHCC-NT was labeled with either Invitrogen Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) or Invitrogen Alexa Fluor 647 (AF647) dye using amine reactive NHS ester crosslinking chemistry following the Invitrogen NHS Ester protocol. In short, RHCC-NT was dialyzed into PBS, pH 7.4 after which the amine reactive compounds were solubilized in DMSO to a final concentration of 5 mg/mL. The reactive dye solution was added to the protein sample using a 50× molar excess and allowed to react at room temperature for 1 h until reaction termination by addition of TRIS buffer, pH 7.5 to a final concentration of 100 mM. Fluorescently labeled protein samples were dialyzed in 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 154 mM NaCl, concentrated to 5 mg/mL and stored at 5 °C until experimental use.

MCF-7 cells were cultured from a frozen cryovial in a T75 flask (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a seeding cell density of 1 × 105 cells/mL. The cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 5% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere until 90% confluency. Cells were split into new flasks and grown until 80% confluency after which RHCC-NT-AF488 was added to one flask at a final concentration of 5 µM, while the other flask served as a negative control. After 16 h of incubation, MCF-7 cells were washed twice with PBS and subjected to TrypLE Express Enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for cell detachment. Detached cells were centrifuged and re-suspended in DMEM. Cell samples for mammalian cell uptake of RHCC-NT were then analyzed by flow cytometry using a BD FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) which used a 488 nm laser and emission filter at 515/30 nm. Statistical analyses were performed on the fluorescent and scattering measurements for each cell population sample. Results are expressed as the median value and Coefficient of Variation (CV) over 10,000 events.

Further, MCF-7 cells were grown in well plates at a seeding density of 5 × 105 cells/ml to 80% confluency. Varying concentrations of RHCC-NT-AF647 were added ranging from 1 nM to 10 µM. This also included a negative control. After an incubation period of 16 h at 37 °C, cells were washed, DAPI stained and imaged using an Invitrogen EVOS FL Auto 2 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Results

Nanotube takes up o-carborane

Carborane, C2B10H12, a boron rich compound with applications in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy, binds into the hydrophobic cavities of RHCC-NT upon mutual incubation at 50 °C (Fig. 1A). To acquire structural information, we pre-incubated and crystallized the RHCC-NT-C2B10H12 complex which showed that the highly stable tetrameric proteinaceous nanotube, consisting of four right-handed helices, completely encloses the boron clusters (PDB ID 7R6H). We observed that the chemical interactions that stabilize the o-carborane inside the cavity are mainly hydrophobic, mediated by the amino acid side chains of Leu and Ile of the respective cavity. Based on spatial analysis, the two center cavities each have a spherical volume of around 240 Å3, allowing for binding of the o-carborane clusters with their steric bulk of 148 Å334. The outer cavities have a spatial volume of around 180 Å3, surrounded by hydrophobic amino acid side chains which would also allow for o-carborane ligand binding. Nonetheless, based on experimental electron densities, we detected that three out of the four nanotube cavities contain boron clusters (Fig. 1A); o-carborane is absent in the N-terminal cavity of the nanotube. Thus, ligand incubation allows for an integration of 30 boron atoms per nanotube. Interestingly, the uptake of o-carborane did not cause any final conformational changes to the nanotube which is most likely due to the extreme rigidity of the macromolecule caused by its many intramolecular interactions such as salt bridges and additional hydrophobic interactions between the helices. Similar results have previously been shown for other hydrophobic ligands such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and sulfur rings14,16. To further confirm the uptake of o-carborane into RHCC-NT, we performed a Boron Nuclear Magnetic Resonance experiment comparing liganded versus unliganded nanotube samples. The Boron spectra under different conditions were measured, where the samples consisted of o-carborane in water, in toluene or in the presence of RHCC-NT. Our results show chemical shifts corresponding to the boron nuclei moving from a hydrophilic to a hydrophobic environment in the presence of the nanotube (Fig. 1B). These shifts validate the structural experiments and confirm diffusion of o-carborane into the inside of the nanotube upon incubation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nanotube-ligand structural models and uptake confirmation of o-carborane. (A) Structure of the RHCC-NT-C2B10H12 complex model at 2.2 Å (PDB ID 7R6H) which shows the uptake of three o-carborane molecules into the nanotube. (B) The uptake of o-carborane, C2B10H12 was confirmed using Boron NMR showing Boron shifts from an aqueous into a hydrophobic environment. (C) Models of o-carborane in the center cavity’s hydrophobic environment. The hydrophobic boron cluster is coordinated between the amino acid side chains of Ile30 and Leu37 from each helix via van der Waals forces. Protein figures were made using PyMOL 2.3.2 (https://pymol.org/2/).

Carborane uptake mechanism and associated free energies

The hydrophobic pockets of the tetrameric structure of RHCC-NT, which are mainly constructed by the side chains of leucine and isoleucine amino acids, allow for hydrophobic coordination of the o-carborane molecules (Fig. 1C). Upon expression of the protein nanotube, the cavities are filled with highly ordered water clusters which causes the system to be marginally energetically favourable. Thus, transfer of o-carborane into the hydrophobic cavities and displacement of the water clusters is energetically favourable due to the hydrophobic effect. The pathways and energetics of o-carborane transfer between one of the cavities of RHCC-NT and the solvent were investigated with molecular dynamics simulations using the methods of steered molecular dynamics2630 and umbrella sampling3133. The o-carborane in the C-terminal domain cavity was pulled out of the nanotube at a constant speed of v = 0.01 nm/ps. The boron cluster moved through a gap between two neighbouring protein helices along a nominally linear path transverse to the central channel by a moving harmonic steering force with spring constant k = 4000 kJ mol−1 nm−2 which was applied to the centre of mass of the molecule. We then used MD steering simulation to extract a large number of approximately equally spaced reference positions for the o-carborane along the exit trajectory. The method of Umbrella Sampling3133 was used to construct a biased probability distribution Pibd (Fig. 2A) and a free energy profile Gi(d) over a sampling window centred on each reference position i as a function of the distance d along the exit pathway. This allowed us to generate a global free energy profile G(d) for the complete exit pathway by an application of WHAM31,35 (Fig. 2B). Inspection of the free energy profile shows that occupancy of the cavity by o-carborane is significantly favoured over the solvated state with Gsol-Gcav ~ 80–100 kJ mol−1. Further, the activation barrier for the diffusion of o-carborane through the walls of RHCC-NT from the solvent to the cavity is much lower than the activation barrier for escape from the cavity with ΔGcapture10-20kJmol-1<<ΔGrelease80-120kJmol-1 (Table S3). Presumably, this is due to the different chemical environment that the o-carborane is placed in where the van der Waals interactions in the cavity increase its overall stability.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Molecular dynamics simulations of the exit pathway of o-carborane, C2B10H12 out of the C-terminal cavity of RHCC-NT. (A) Biased distribution, Pibd of the simulation and (B) global free energy, G(d) as o-carborane moves out of the cavity through the interhelical channel into the solvent. (C) Cartoon representation of calculated o-carborane positions as it moves between the solvent and cavity through the interhelical channel of the nanotube. Protein figures were made using PyMOL 2.3.2 (https://pymol.org/2/).

The molecular dynamics simulations allowed us to visualize the exit pathway along the steering trajectory at selected points (Fig. 2C). Over the interval, 0 ≤ t < 2500 ps the carborane molecule remained trapped in cavity. However, between 2500 ps < t < 8300 ps, the o-carborane molecule passed through the wall by bending residue side chains first in the vicinity of residue Glu38 (2500 ps < t < 4500 ps) and then in the vicinity of residue Arg33 (4500 ps < t < 8300 ps) before entering the solvent for t > 8300 ps. The movement between the cavity and the solvent created an interhelical channel where the backbone and the amino acid side chains of two of the four helices underwent large conformational changes. Nonetheless, due to the high stability of the nanotube with its many intramolecular interactions, the system did not fall apart.

The high stability of RHCC-NT in complex with o-carborane was confirmed through a thermal unfolding and size distribution analysis over a temperature range ranging from 20 to 95 °C. Over this temperature range, the internal fluorescence due to the Tyr residues did not show an unfolding event (Figure S2) and the cumulant radius remained the same (Figure S3). The polydispersity indices for the RHCC-NT and RHCC-NT-o-carborane were 0.232 and 0.347, respectively. This data indicates high stability of the RHCC-NT and a minimal change in dispersity upon uptake of the ligand.

Eukaryotic cells internalize RHCC-NT

The protein nanotube can be internalized by eukaryotic cells and distributes itself in the cytoplasm such as in MCF-7 cancer cells. To demonstrate this ability, we fluorescently labeled and exposed the nanotube to the cells for a set time after which the cells were washed, cell nuclei were DAPI-stained and imaged (Fig. 3A, B). The results produced fluorescent signals corresponding to the tagged protein inside the cells, clustered around the nucleus. Furthermore, the fluorescent intensities were measured using a flow cytometer to further confirm cellular uptake of RHCC-NT and determine the fraction of fluorescent shifted cells. Here, we found that the cell samples exposed to RHCC-NT showed a clear fluorescent intensity, FLH-1 shift from a median of 4.26 to 557.31, validating the uptake of the fluorescently labeled protein during the incubation period (Fig. 3C). CV values for the MCF-7 cell control and MCF-7 cells incubated with RHCC-NT were 77.45 and 75.35, respectively. Due to the significant fluorescent signal separation of the two cell populations, we were able to calculate the fraction of cells that were associated with RHCC-NT; based on a confidence interval of three standard deviations, 99.5% of the MCF-7 cell population that was incubated with the nanotube is above the threshold of association. Similarly, controlling for potential cell population changes, we compared the forward scattering against the fluorescent signal at 515/30 nm; whereas the fluorescent signal shifted, the forward scattering medians are statistically identical over 10,000 events; values measured were 413 (CV = 30.74) for the control and 416 (CV = 27.12) for the RHCC-NT exposed cell population (Fig. 3D). Thus, cell sizes remained unaffected upon exposure of the nanotube, indicating intact cell compartmentalization upon internalization of fluorescently labeled nanotube material.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Nanotube cell-internalization assays using fluorescently labeled RHCC-NT show the accumulation of RHCC-NT inside of eukaryotic cells. (A) MCF-7 cells and (B) MCF-7 cells incubated with RHCC-NT-AF647 for 16 h were washed and imaged using multiple fluorescent and bright-field filters. Cell nuclei were stained with NucBlue™. (C) Fluorescent shift in flow cytometry of MCF-7 cells incubated with RHCC-NT-AF488 (red) compared against the negative control (black). (D) Forward scattering profile against the fluorescent shift of MCF-7 cells incubated with and without RHCC-NT-AF488.

Discussion

Nanotube takes up carborane for BNCT

BNCT is a compelling therapy used to fight several cancer types such as breast, head and neck carcinomas1,8. However, effective delivery of boron rich compounds, which is necessary for a potent treatment, has not been achieved and continues to be a research priority3,9,36. RHCC-NT provides a novel route for boron drug delivery based on its ability to take up o-carborane, a boron rich molecule. Molecular uptake was confirmed by boron NMR studies and by structural studies through crystallography, which allowed for chemical characterization of the protein–ligand complex. In the case of o-carborane, the ligand is stabilized in the center of the cavities through hydrophobic interactions with amino acid side chains which cause the entry of o-carborane to be energetically favourable. The uptake occurs spontaneously due to the hydrophobic effect which seeks to replace the native and energetically unstable water molecules present in the cavities. Chemical shifts in NMR demonstrated that o-carborane shifted from a hydrophilic to a hydrophobic environment in the presence of the protein nanotube. Mechanistically, MD simulations show that interhelical channels to the cavities form thus allowing o-carborane to move into the nanotube. Importantly, these intermediate channels do not seem to disturb the final overall shape and structure of the o-carborane bound nanotube. This same effect has previously been observed for other hydrophobic molecules taken up by RHCC-NT15,16.

Moreover, due to the large buried surface area (> 50%) of each nanotube helix and a high number of intramolecular ionic interactions, the nanotube is extremely stable which is evident by its high TM of > 90 °C13,37. Our thermal size distribution analysis of the RHCC-NT in complex with the ligand did not show a thermal unfolding event. Although the polydispersity of the sample increased, the cumulant radius remained the same over the temperature gradient. This highly stable tetrameric structure prevents the protein from dissociating or exposing the hydrophobic cavities to the exterior. The significant stability confers the advantage that the drug of interest, in our case o-carborane, is buried inside the cavities; the hydrophobic molecules will not diffuse out of the carrier until the protein is denatured or digested. Additionally, the nanotube overcomes the hydrophobicity issue of o-carborane delivery into cells by increasing the effective solubility while completely shielding any possible toxic effects of the drug.

It is advantageous to deliver high boron quantities to target cells for BNCT as certain quantity thresholds have to be met in order for the treatment to be successful. Desired cellular boron quantities have been determined to be at around 109 10B atoms/cell or 20 µg 10B/g tumour1,5,11. Exceeding these amounts per cell will increase the impact of neutron radiation and may positively affect final treatment results. However, sufficient boron delivery is a current challenge faced in BNCT development. Nanoparticle based drug delivery could assist in delivering such a payload to tumor cells, making BNCT a more compelling treatment option. The nanotube has a length of approximately 7.7 nm and a diameter of 1.8 nm, binding three o-carborane molecules. Assuming that 30 10B atoms are integrated per RHCC-NT, adequate delivery would be achieved by delivering 1.5 mg RHCC-NT-C2B10H12/g tumour intracellularly.

RHCC-NT as a drug delivery device

The proteinaceous nanotube RHCC-NT has significant potentials as a drug delivery device where the drug of interest is placed into the cavities and taken up by cells in close proximity. To our knowledge, there currently is only one protein based nanoparticle carrier clinically approved for cancer therapies; the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel7,38. Nanoparticles offer certain advantages over other methods, such as increased delivery, as well as stability and control of potentially toxic small molecules7. This is especially true for small molecules in cancer therapies such as paclitaxel where delivery and side effects are major obstacles for effective treatment. In parallel, neutron capture therapy is poorly utilized in treatment, as one of the main problems is the effective delivery of high avidity compounds like 10B isotopes. Naturally, boron compounds display low toxicity to the human body3,39 but delivery and targeting of boron rich compounds has been difficult to achieve due to either low and unspecific incorporation or high hydrophobicity such as in o-carborane molecules40. RHCC-NT in complex with o-carborane addresses these issues and provides a solution to this longstanding problem in the BNCT field.

As previous research has shown, RHCC-NT will bind surrounding FaDu eukaryotic cells in as little as 10 min and is incorporated intracellularly at significant levels at around 4 h18. These studies also showed that endotoxin-purified RHCC-NT only causes a minimal immune response in in vivo experiments; CD8+ T-cell production increased slightly but without a significant antibody response18. Our studies further explored effects in cancer cell lines and observed similar results where the nanotube is internalized by an entire cell population and accumulates in the cytoplasm around the nucleus. For this delivery system, cell internalization is not necessary as the mere attachment of the drug filled nanotubes to the target cells would allow for effective killing upon neutron exposure. However, efficient uptake of the nanotube is still desirable, as neutron therapy results improve when 10B is closer to the cell’s nucleus as DNA damage from free radicals and ionizing radiation is most effective in initiating cell death8,41. Additionally, release of o-carborane from the nanotube is not necessary since neutron beams would penetrate the protein structure inside of a cell causing it to activate its desired effects. Thus, o-carborane loaded nanotubes in combination with intravenous injections could prove to be a compelling BNCT drug delivery method. Future studies should aim to explore the nanotube’s in vivo drug delivery distribution and accumulation for BNCT.

As these proteins are highly modular, there are additional possibilities for attaching biomolecular tags that would allow the specific delivery of the nanotube to target cells. Certain cell receptors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR) or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which are overexpressed in cancer cells, offer potential targets for nanotube modifications3,42. Previous research has also focused on attaching folate molecules to nanoparticles for cancer therapy development which offers the advantage of targeting overexpressed folate receptors on tumor cells43,44. In the case of RHCC-NT, functionalizing the nanotube is a possibility that warrants further investigation.

The physicochemical characterization of RHCC-NT as a drug delivery device presented in this study, specifically for BNCT, highlights its many advantageous properties for the delivery of hydrophobic molecules such as o-carborane. Although further investigations have to prove its viability for targeting and elimination of cancer cells as a result of delivery and neutron activation of boron clusters, the nanotube shows promising abilities as a nanoparticle based therapeutic approach for various carcinomas.

Supplementary Information

Author contributions

J.S., M.M. and F.H. designed the study. All authors were involved in experimental design. F.H. and C.A. produced and functionalized the protein nanotube. M.M., D.D. and F.H. performed NMR studies. F.H. and M.M. solved the crystal structure while C.H-V. and R.R. carried out the molecular dynamics simulations. F.H., J.W. and A.M-T. performed cell assays. F.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in the editorial process for the final manuscript. F.H. and M.M. have contributed equally and share first authorship. All authors consent that this study is to be submitted for publication.

Funding

JS is a Tier-1 CRC in Structural Biology and Biophysics, and this research is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; Grant Number: 201610PJT-152935) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; Grant Number: RGPIN-004954-2017).

Data availability

Electron densities and atomic coordinates for the RHCC in complex with o-carborane structure is available at the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 7R6H). Additional data is available in the supplemental material and upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Fabian Heide and Matthew McDougall.

Contributor Information

Fabian Heide, Email: Heidef@myumanitoba.ca.

Jörg Stetefeld, Email: Jorg.Stetefeld@umanitoba.ca.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-95044-0.

References

  • 1.Dymova MA, Taskaev SY, Richter VA, Kuligina EV. Boron neutron capture therapy: Current status and future perspectives. Cancer Commun. 2020;40:406–421. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yong Z, et al. Boron neutron capture therapy for malignant melanoma: First clinical case report in China. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2016;28:634–640. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.06.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barth RF, Mi P, Yang W. Boron delivery agents for neutron capture therapy of cancer. Cancer Commun. 2018;38:35. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0299-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kreiner AJ, et al. Present status of accelerator-based BNCT. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2016;21:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hartman T, Carlsson J. Radiation dose heterogeneity in receptor and antigen mediated boron neutron capture therapy. Radiother. Oncol. 1994;31:61–75. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90414-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakamura H. Boron lipid-based liposomal boron delivery system for neutron capture therapy: Recent development and future perspective. Future Med. Chem. 2013;5:715–730. doi: 10.4155/fmc.13.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wicki A, Witzigmann D, Balasubramanian V, Huwyler J. Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications. J. Control Rel. 2015;200:138–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li L, et al. On-demand biodegradable boron nitride nanoparticles for treating triple negative breast cancer with boron neutron capture therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13:13843–13852. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pulagam KR, et al. Gold nanoparticles as boron carriers for boron neutron capture therapy: Synthesis, radiolabelling and in vivo evaluation. Molecules. 2019;24:66. doi: 10.3390/molecules24193609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu K, et al. Boron agents for neutron capture therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020;405:213139. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Worm DJ, et al. Selective neuropeptide y conjugates with maximized carborane loading as promising boron delivery agents for boron neutron capture therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2020;63:2358–2371. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoppenz P, et al. A selective carborane-functionalized gastrin-releasing peptide receptor agonist as boron delivery agent for boron neutron capture therapy. J. Org. Chem. 2020;85:1446–1457. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b02406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stetefeld J, et al. Crystal structure of a naturally occurring parallel right-handed coiled coil tetramer. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000;7:772–776. doi: 10.1038/79006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McDougall, M., Francisco, O., Harder-viddal, C., Roshko, R. & Meier, M. Archaea S-layer nanotube from a “ black smoker ” in complex with cyclo-octasulfur (S 8) rings. 2209–2216 (2017). 10.1002/prot.25385. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Harder-Viddal C, McDougall M, Roshko RM, Stetefeld J. Energetics of storage and diffusion of water and cyclo-octasulfur for a nonpolar cavity of RHCC tetrabrachion by molecular dynamics simulations. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2019;17:675–683. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McDougall M, et al. Proteinaceous nano container encapsulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37323-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McDougall M, Mceleney K, Francisco O, Trieu B. Reductive power of the archaea right-handed coiled coil nanotube (RHCC-NT) and incorporation of mercury clusters inside protein cages. J. Struct. Biol. 2018;203:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eriksson M, et al. Utilization of a right-handed coiled-coil protein from archaebacterium Staphylothermus marinus as a carrier for cisplatin. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:11–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thanasupawat T, et al. Platinum(IV) coiled coil nanotubes selectively kill human glioblastoma cells. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015;11:913–925. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McFarlane AA, Orriss GL, Stetefeld J. The use of coiled-coil proteins in drug delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;625:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meier M, Stetefeld J, Burkhard P. The many types of interhelical ionic interactions in coiled coils—An overview. J. Struct. Biol. 2010;170:192–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 2005;26:1701–1718. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sárosi M-B, Lybrand TP. Molecular dynamics simulation of cyclooxygenase-2 complexes with indomethacin closo-carborane analogs. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2018;58:1990–1999. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Timofeeva TV, Suponitsky KY, Yanovsky AI, Allinger NL. The MM3 force field for 12-vertex boranes and carboranes. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997;536–537:481–488. doi: 10.1016/S0022-328X(96)06819-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gamba Z, Powell BM. The condensed phases of carboranes. J. Chem. Phys. 1996;105:2436–2440. doi: 10.1063/1.472111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grubm ller, H., Heymann, B. & Tavan, P. Ligand binding: molecular mechanics calculation of the streptavidin-biotin rupture force. Science (80-. ).271, 997–999 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Izrailev S, Stepaniants S, Balsera M, Oono Y, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics study of unbinding of the avidin-biotin complex. Biophys. J. 1997;72:1568–1581. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78804-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Evans E, Ritchie K. Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys. J. 1997;72:1541–1555. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78802-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Balsera M, Stepaniants S, Izrailev S, Oono Y, Schulten K. Reconstructing potential energy functions from simulated force-induced unbinding processes. Biophys. J. 1997;73:1281–1287. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78161-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K. Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001;11:224–230. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00194-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Torrie GM, Valleau JP. Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling. J. Comput. Phys. 1977;23:187–199. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90121-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Torrie GM, Valleau JP. Monte Carlo free energy estimates using non-Boltzmann sampling: Application to the sub-critical Lennard–Jones fluid. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974;28:578–581. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)80109-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kästner J. Umbrella sampling. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2011;1:932–942. doi: 10.1002/wcms.66. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Eleazer BJ, Peryshkov DV. Coordination chemistry of carborane clusters: Metal-boron bonds in carborane, carboranyl, and carboryne complexes. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2018;38:79–109. doi: 10.1080/02603594.2018.1465939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules I. The method. J. Comput. Chem. 1992;13:1011–1021. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540130812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki M. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT): A unique role in radiotherapy with a view to entering the accelerator-based BNCT era. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;25:43–50. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01480-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Harbury, P. B., Plecs, J. J., Tidor, B., Alber, T. & Kim, P. S. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science (80-. ).282, 1462–1467 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Paál K, Müller J, Hegedûs L. High affinity binding of paclitaxel to human serum albumin. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001;268:2187–2191. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bolt HM, Başaran N, Duydu Y. Effects of boron compounds on human reproduction. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:717–724. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02700-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ali F, Hosmane N, Zhu Y. Boron chemistry for medical applications. Molecules. 2020;25:1–24. doi: 10.3390/molecules25040828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sköld K, et al. Boron neutron capture therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: An assessment of clinical potential. Br. J. Radiol. 2010;83:596–603. doi: 10.1259/bjr/56953620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang W, et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of EGFRvIII-positive gliomas using boronated monoclonal antibody L8A4. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:3792–3802. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leamon CP, Reddy JA. Folate-targeted chemotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004;56:1127–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Farran B, et al. Folate-conjugated nanovehicles: Strategies for cancer therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2020;107:110341. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Electron densities and atomic coordinates for the RHCC in complex with o-carborane structure is available at the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 7R6H). Additional data is available in the supplemental material and upon reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES