Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2021 Jul 21;118(30):e2020997118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020997118

Nuclear envelope budding is a response to cellular stress

Dimitra Panagaki a,1, Jacob T Croft a,1, Katharina Keuenhof a, Lisa Larsson Berglund a, Stefanie Andersson a, Verena Kohler b, Sabrina Büttner b, Markus J Tamás a, Thomas Nyström c, Richard Neutze a, Johanna L Höög a,2
PMCID: PMC8325156  PMID: 34290138

Significance

A defining feature of eukaryotes is the nuclear envelope, a double lipid bilayer that serves to isolate and protect the cell’s genetic material. Transport of large molecules over this barrier is believed to occur almost exclusively via the nuclear pores. However, herpes virions and mega-ribonucleoproteins (megaRNPs) use an alternative means of transport—via nuclear envelope budding (NEB). Here, we show NEB is a ubiquitous eukaryotic phenomenon and increases when exposed to various forms of cellular stress. NEB frequency was maximal when the cell was challenged with a drug that induces protein misfolding, indicating this transport pathway plays a role in protein quality control. These results imply that NEB is an underappreciated yet potentially fundamental means of nuclear transport.

Keywords: nuclear transport, budding, vesicles, electron tomography, protein quality control

Abstract

Nuclear envelope budding (NEB) is a recently discovered alternative pathway for nucleocytoplasmic communication distinct from the movement of material through the nuclear pore complex. Through quantitative electron microscopy and tomography, we demonstrate how NEB is evolutionarily conserved from early protists to human cells. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, NEB events occur with higher frequency during heat shock, upon exposure to arsenite or hydrogen peroxide, and when the proteasome is inhibited. Yeast cells treated with azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, a proline analog that induces protein misfolding, display the most dramatic increase in NEB, suggesting a causal link to protein quality control. This link was further supported by both localization of ubiquitin and Hsp104 to protein aggregates and NEB events, and the evolution of these structures during heat shock. We hypothesize that NEB is part of normal cellular physiology in a vast range of species and that in S. cerevisiae NEB comprises a stress response aiding the transport of protein aggregates across the nuclear envelope.


The nucleus is the most prominent organelle in eukaryotic cells, enclosing most of the cellular genetic material within a double lipid bilayer called the nuclear envelope. These two membranes arose as a critical evolutionary step distinguishing eukaryotes from prokaryotes and restricting which molecules come into contact with the cellular DNA. As the nuclear envelope is not permeable to most of the molecules inside the cell, special structures called nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) exist on its surface that allow highly selective translocation over the nuclear membrane (13). Molecules smaller than 30 to 40 kDa can passively penetrate the NPC from the cytoplasm into the nucleus and vice versa, whereas bigger molecules require interaction with nuclear transport receptors and form importin/exportin complexes that are guided through the pores (48).

Since its discovery in 1954, the NPC has generally been accepted as the only means of communication between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm (9). However, herpes simplex virus replicates in the nucleoplasm and is released into the cytosol via an outward budding of the nuclear envelope (1013). This demonstrates another pathway for nuclear export, and there have been several observations suggesting that nuclear envelope budding (NEB) also occurs in healthy cells, with different interpretations of this mechanism being suggested (1427). These observations were made in a diverse set of organisms but primarily using cells that are under differentiation (embryonic cells), and various terminologies were given to describe the NEB process (SI Appendix, Table S1). The most recent reports were made in healthy developing Drosophila melanogaster larvae, in the sea urchin gastrula, and in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2832). Previous studies have shown that budding events in D. melanogaster contain large ribonucleoprotein granules, but whether this function is consistent in other cell types remains unknown (28, 31).

Evidence that material can be exported from the nucleus through NEB has sparked speculation that other large cargoes, such as protein aggregates, could be removed from the nucleus by a similar mechanism (33). Protein misfolding can be highly toxic to the cell and therefore multiple stress-induced mechanisms have evolved to cope with proteotoxicity (3436). Cells experiencing large-scale protein misfolding exhibit DNA mutagenesis, which is one of the first steps toward carcinogenesis (37), demonstrating the importance of protein quality control in the nucleus (38). Despite the cell’s primary protein quality control factors, such as chaperones and the ubiquitin–proteasome system, being active in the nucleus, protein aggregates still form under stressful conditions such as heat shock, because these processes cannot fully cope with the quantity of misfolded proteins (39). In most occasions, protein aggregates will enter the nucleus for degradation but cases of nuclear misfolded proteins being transported out of the nucleus to be degraded in the cytoplasm have also been reported (39). Nuclear protein aggregates greatly exceed the 39-nm size limit of active transportation through the NPCs (40, 41), implying that an alternative pathway for their export is required if they are to be transported over the nuclear envelope.

As well as transporting material from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, NEB can also result in the transfer of a portion of the inner nuclear membrane (INM) to the outer nuclear membrane, which is continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In addition to protein quality control mechanisms in the nucleus and cytoplasm, the ER is equipped with its own set of degradation pathways, to contend with the large quantity of newly synthesized proteins entering the ER (42). Protein degradation in the ER is highly dependent on the ubiquitin–proteasome system and facilitates removal of both misfolded soluble and membrane proteins (43). Similarly, degradation of INM proteins can occur via biochemically similar pathways to ER-associated degradation of membrane proteins (44). Several branches of INM-associated degradation exist, each relying on a different E3 ubiquitin ligase to recognize and tag misfolded substrates through ubiquitination steps (4547). These reflections pose the question: Does NEB provide an escape valve needed for clearance of aggregated nuclear proteins? To address this issue, we have examined the NEB pathway of S. cerevisiae under five different stress conditions, all of which caused an increase in NEB events. We also show the presence of NEB in five different evolutionarily distant organisms (Homo sapiens, Caenorhabditis elegans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Trypanosoma brucei) under normal growth conditions, which reveals the evolutionary conservation of the NEB pathway. Our findings provide evidence that NEB is part of the cell’s natural stress response and an important pathway to consider when studying nuclear transport, especially with regard to the protein quality control system.

Results

NEB Increases in Frequency during Heat Shock in S. cerevisiae.

S. cerevisiae provides a well-understood model system, perfectly tailored to investigate whether NEB is an active part of the cellular stress response. An easily applied stress impulse is heat shock, and we therefore subjected S. cerevisiae cells to a mild constant heat stress (38 °C) for a time course of up to 90 min (Fig. 1A). Cells were then cryo-immobilized for electron microscopy (EM) studies, which are able to simultaneously visualize both NEB events and protein aggregates, the latter appearing as electron-dense content (EDC) (48) within the nucleus (Fig. 1B). For each time point, between 60 and 80 electron micrographs were acquired, each from a randomly chosen cell section that passed through the cell nucleus. NEB events were identified as electron-dense material localized between the two nuclear envelopes, causing it to deform, with a low number of events showing budding of the nuclear membrane but seeming to lack an electron-dense cargo (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). A membrane bilayer was often, but not always, detectable around this material. NEB events commonly had an internal texture resembling the nucleoplasm (Fig. 1B), but in some rare events the bud appeared to contain cytoplasmic material including ribosomes (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). In one case, a vacuole was seen engulfing a protrusion of the nucleus. This phenomenon is termed piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus and has previously been described in nutrient-deprived cells (49). Piecemeal microautophagy has a distinct morphology from the NEB events and was not included in our quantification.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Nuclear envelope budding (NEB) increases in frequency during heat shock in S. cerevisiae. (A) Percentage of nuclei exhibiting NEB (left axis, black bars) and electron dense content (EDC; right axis, gray bars) as a function of time after cells have been subjected to heat shock (38 °C; n = 63–337). NEB peaked at a level of 10.3% after 30 min, and EDC exhibited a stable plateau of about 81% between 15 and 45 min. (B) Thin section containing NEB and EDC in heat-shocked S. cerevisiae cells. The black arrow indicates NEB event, where the outer nuclear membrane clearly protrudes outward and a particle resides within the perinuclear space. (C) Labeling density of gold particles between untreated and heat-shocked cells (38 °C for 30 min) using an anti-GFP antibody. Both Hsp104-GFP and guk1-7-GFP were preferentially localized at the EDC areas compared to the rest of the nucleoplasm. (D) Labeling density of Hsp104 using an anti-Hsp104 antibody in wild-type and hsp104Δ cells subjected to heat shock at 38 °C for 45 min. No gold particles were detected in the mutant strain showing the specificity of the antibody. (E–G) Representative images and respective models of the immunostained samples quantified in C and D. Hsp104 and guk1-7 are significantly localized to the EDC area, whereas only one gold is detected in the EDC of the hsp104Δ mutant. Scale bars: 300 nm (B); 500 nm (E–G). Abbreviations: EDC, electron-dense content; N, nucleus; NEB, nuclear envelope budding; V, vacuole. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. zero time point or control group; ns, no significant differences between groups.

Morphological variations of NEB (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) could represent different stages of the same process or different processes. Images were scored both for the presence of NEB events and EDC in the nucleus. Both NEB and EDC increased during heat shock, prior to decreasing near the end of the time course, which potentially reflects a cellular adaptation to the new temperature (Fig. 1A). EDC reaches a maximum (83.3% of sections) after 15 min and stays relatively stable at this level until 90 min, at which point it is only present in 60.5% of sections (Fig. 1A). NEB events were found in 2.4% of cellular sections in undisturbed cultures, but this fraction significantly increased to 10.3% after 30 min of heat shock. The effect of a stronger heat shock treatment (42 °C for 30 min) was examined to detect a possible correlation of the NEB frequency to the level of stress. NEB frequency was also here significantly increased in comparison to the control as 16.6% of the nuclear sections displayed NEB (SI Appendix, Fig. S2).

To verify that the observed EDC in the nucleus are protein aggregates, immuno-EM against the disaggregase Hsp104 (50) and the model misfolding protein temperature-sensitive mutant guk1-7 (51) was performed. In these experiments, the secondary antibody is coupled to a gold particle for visualization using EM. Both Hsp104 and guk1-7 localized to the EDC material upon heat shock (Fig. 1 C, E, and F; n = number of examined structures). As a control, an anti–Hsp104 antibody was used to label the EDC in heat-shocked wild-type and hsp104Δ cells to validate the specificity of the labeling. High labeling density of the EDC could be detected in the wild-type strain, whereas in the hsp104Δ strain almost no unspecific gold particles were found (Fig. 1 D and G).

The concurrent increase in frequency of NEB and protein aggregation strengthens the hypothesis that NEB may indeed have an important function during normal cellular stress response. This apparent correlation between the frequency of NEB with heat shock motivated us to test whether this pathway is solely affected by heat shock or whether cells react in a similar fashion under different stress conditions.

Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Arsenite Stressors Also Increase NEB Frequency.

Cells may encounter a variety of stress conditions, and each of them has a different impact on the cell (52). To investigate whether additional cellular stresses also correlated with an increased frequency of NEB events, we challenged S. cerevisiae cells with multiple stress stimuli. A natural stimulus is aging, which causes a significant induction of stress response pathways in S. cerevisiae (35, 53) and has previously been seen to trigger an increase in “nuclear herniations” (54). Several factors are responsible for a measurable decline in cellular and physical functions of aged cells, with one of them being aggregated misfolded proteins (55). We isolated replicatively aged biotinylated S. cerevisiae cells, using streptavidin magnetic beads, from the young unbound population (56) and cryo-immobilized the cells. In old yeast cells, the frequency of NEB events was found to be 9% (Fig. 2 A and D; n = 200 sections), which is significantly higher than an undisturbed S. cerevisiae culture (2.4%; n = 337) (Fig. 1A). However, the remaining younger population also displayed a significant increase in NEB events to 6.9% (n = 204 sections; Fig. 2D), indicating that these cells may also have been stressed by the mechanical handling steps associated with isolating the old cells. Thus, we could not confirm the previous finding of significantly increased NEB events in old cells in comparison to young cells (54), in this experimental setup.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Four different cellular stressors increase NEB frequency in S. cerevisiae cells. Thin sections containing NEB events in (A) old cells, (B) cells subjected to oxidative stress with H2O2, and (C) cells exposed to sodium arsenite. (D) Percentage of nuclei containing NEB events in cells in each stress condition compared to control cultures grown under normal conditions. Young cells were also examined after separation from old cells and show an increase in NEB compared to the control, but to a lesser extent than old cells. Cells exposed to H2O2 were grown in different media than the other cultures, and therefore were compared to a different control culture. n is equal to the number of examined sections. (E) Thin section containing a NEB event in cells treated with AZC, a chemical that causes proteotoxic stress. (F) Percentage of nuclei containing NEB events before as well as 30 and 90 min after treatment with AZC. Cells exhibited a higher percentage of NEB (22%) after 90 min of exposure to AZC than in any other condition tested. All scale bars: 200 nm. Abbreviations: N, nucleus; NEB, nuclear envelope budding. Black arrows indicate NEB events. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 vs. control; ns, no significant differences between groups.

Cells of S. cerevisiae were also subjected to 90 min 0.6 mM H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide, oxidative stress) and 60 min 0.5 mM NaAsO2 (sodium arsenite, heavy metal stress). Treated cells, as well as a control cultures for each condition, were cryo-immobilized and prepared for analysis by EM. Cells that were treated with sodium arsenite had a NEB frequency of 6% (n = 249 sections), and cells treated with hydrogen peroxide had a frequency of 5.9% (n = 204 sections) (Fig. 2 B–D). Both control samples had lower levels of NEB events, as found in undisturbed S. cerevisiae (2.4% for the sodium arsenite control for n = 337 and 1.5% for the H2O2 control for n = 197; Fig. 2D). From this set of observations, we conclude that NEB is increased in hydrogen peroxide and sodium arsenite stress as well.

NEB Frequency Is Highest under Induction of Protein Misfolding.

All of the stressors examined above have previously been shown to increase rates of aggregation of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm and within the nucleus (35, 5759). To investigate whether or not the observed increase in NEB events is indeed correlated with proteotoxic stress, we examined S. cerevisiae cells after treatment with azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZC). AZC competes with the amino acid proline during translation and may be mistakenly incorporated into proteins. Since AZC has one fewer carbon atom in its ring (four carbon atoms instead of five as in proline), its incorporation into a polypeptide causes a different conformation of the amino acid backbone and this results in aggregation of proteins with nonnative structures (60, 61). Cells were grown at normal temperature (30 °C) and were treated with AZC, cryo-immobilized after 30 and 90 min, and prepared for analysis by EM. Cellular viability upon treatment with all of the stressors mentioned above was not compromised, as validated with propidium iodide (PI) staining, indicative of plasma membrane rupture and thus cell death (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).

The NEB frequency was similar in untreated cells and cells after 30 min of AZC exposure (2.4%, n = 337 sections, and 2.6%, n = 114 sections, respectively; Fig. 2F). However, after 90 min of exposure to AZC, the number of NEB events dramatically increased in frequency, reaching 22% (Fig. 2 E and F; n = 100). This time-dependent increase in NEB after AZC exposure demonstrates a direct link between the NEB pathway and how the cell accommodates proteotoxic stress.

NEB Events Are Ubiquitinated.

Most proteins that are destined for degradation through the 26S proteasome system must first bind to a poly-ubiquitin chain (62). Moreover, ubiquitin signaling is known to target cytosolic proteins and organelles for degradation by autophagy (63, 64). To probe whether the NEB cargo is targeted for protein degradation via ubiquitin signaling, we performed immuno-EM analysis on S. cerevisiae cells with a polyclonal antibody that has a stronger affinity to poly-ubiquitin chains than to monomeric ubiquitin (Abcam; ab19247). In order to stimulate an increase of the NEB events, cells were subjected to 30 min of heat shock. Images of 60 randomly chosen cell sections were recorded, and the number of gold particles per area of various cell structures were quantified (Fig. 3B). Lipid droplets were used as a negative control (4 gold particles/μm2) (Fig. 3 A and B) and autophagosomes were chosen as a positive control (67 gold particles/μm2). The nucleoplasm (excluding areas containing EDC) did not differ from the negative control (4 gold/μm2), whereas EDC (protein aggregates) were labeled fivefold more frequently (21 gold/μm2) (Fig. 3 A and B). Similarly, NEB events (17 gold/μm2) were labeled fourfold more frequently than lipid droplets. In order to achieve a higher n number for the NEB events, cells were actively traced and selected based on the presence of NEB events. Most of the gold particles identified as associated with NEB events had a preference of localizing in close proximity to the membrane of the bud, but in other examples it would localize more centrally (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S3). These results confirm the presence of ubiquitin in both EDC and the NEB events recorded during heat shock in S. cerevisiae.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Association of NEB pathway and protein quality control system. (A) Immunogold labeling with an anti-ubiquitin antibody (ab19247) was quantified as the amount of gold particles per square micrometer for five different cellular structures. Lipid droplets (n = 42) served as a negative and autophagosomes (n = 13) as a positive control. EDC (n = 192) and NEB events (n = 12) exhibited an increase in labeling compared to lipid droplets and the nucleoplasm (n = 42), which was defined as area within the nucleus not containing EDC. (B) Thin sections labeled with the anti-ubiquitin antibody ab19247. To the Bottom of each micrograph, a model is drawn to help distinguish gold particles. Two labeled NEB events are shown in the first two panels, and an EDC containing gold particles is shown in the third panel. (C–E) Proteasomal inhibition triggered a significant increase in NEB events with 73% of them having a distinct electron-dense appearance. (F and G) Immunogold labeling of an anti-GFP antibody of an Hsp104-GFP strain was quantified as the amount of gold particles per square micrometer. Lipid droplets (negative control; n = 41) and EDC (positive control; n = 50). NEB events (n = 10) exhibited an increased labeling density in comparison to the negative control. All scale bars: 200 nm. Abbreviations: APS, autophagosomes; EDC, electron-dense content; LD, lipid droplet; N, nucleus; Np, nucleoplasm; and NEB, nuclear envelope budding. The white arrow indicates NEB.

Proteasome Inhibition Increases NEB Event Frequency.

If our hypothesis were correct that NEB could function to remove misfolded proteins from the nucleus that cannot be accommodated by the proteasome, then the inhibition of the proteasome should alter the NEB event frequency. To investigate this, the proteasome was inhibited using two different methods. First, we treated pdr5Δ cells (65), deficient in a drug efflux pump with the MG132 drug, which is known to partially inhibit proteasomal activity (66). This treatment led to an observed NEB frequency of 7% (n = 200), a significant increase compared to the control group (2.5%; n = 200) (Fig. 3C). In order to achieve a stronger proteasomal inhibition, the Rpn4 transcriptional activator of genes encoding proteasomal subunits (43, 67) was deleted and the derived strain was prepared for analysis. Inhibition of the proteasome was confirmed by performing Western blots against ubiquitin, since decreased proteasome activity will result in an increase of ubiquitinated proteins (Fig. 3D). Most of the observed NEB events (11 of 15) in the rpn4Δ cells had a distinct electron-dense appearance and no obvious membrane surrounded this electron-dense material (Fig. 3E). In comparison to wild-type cells, which displayed a NEB frequency of 2.4% (n = 337), rpn4Δ cells had NEB events in 15% of the sections (n = 100) (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that NEB pathway is an alternative to the ubiquitin–proteasome system.

NEB Structures Contain Hsp104-GFP.

To probe for the presence of aggregated proteins within NEB, we performed immuno-EM in heat-shocked cells (38 °C for 30 min) with an anti-GFP antibody in cells expressing Hsp104-GFP. Even though Hsp104 is not an aggregate per se, it is a well-characterized chaperone that localizes to aggregated proteins in the nucleus and the cytoplasm, where it acts as a disaggregase (6870), and supports the degradation of ubiquitinated membrane proteins in the ER-associated degradation pathway (71). In comparison to the negative control (lipid droplets, 1.7 gold/ μm2), NEB events were highly labeled by gold particles (122 gold/μm2) comparable to the positive control (EDC, 144 gold/μm2) (Fig. 3 F and G). This finding is consistent with either a function of NEB in transporting misfolded nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm, or INM proteins to the ER for degradation.

NEB Structures Are Not Misassembled NPCs.

It has been suggested that NEB events are misassembled NPCs (54, 72). When certain key genes required for NPC assembly are deleted, herniations of the nuclear envelope similar to NEB events are observed (73, 74). These types of herniations have a distinct morphology with a “neck resembling” formation between the vesicle and the INM, which was revealed to be a defective NPC by subtomogram averaging (75). These NPC-exposing herniae are then degraded by autophagy (75, 76). In addition, NPCs assemble via an inside-out mechanism during which the INM evaginates slightly, although functional NPC assembly does not resemble NEB (77).

To clarify whether our observed NEB could also be misassembled NPCs, we performed immuno-EM using an antibody that recognizes four NPC components (Nup62, Nup153, Nup214, and Nup358) on both undisturbed S. cerevisiae cultures as well as the aged cells. In the undisturbed culture, the majority (67%) of NPCs observed were labeled by gold particles (positive control; n = 95) (Fig. 4 A and E) and only 16.7% of lipid droplets (negative control; n = 82). Only in one case was a NEB event labeled (16.6%; n = 6) (Fig. 4C), whereas all other NEB events were unlabeled (Fig. 4 B, C, and E). In the old yeast cells, 81% of the observed NPCs were labeled by gold particles (positive control; n = 100) (Fig. 4 D and E), whereas only 8% of lipid droplets were labeled (negative control; n = 100) (Fig. 4E). In contrast, only one atypical NEB event was labeled by a gold particle (10%; n = 10) (Fig. 4E).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

NEB structures are not misassembled NPCs. Immunogold labeling, with the Mab414 antibody, which recognizes four different NPC proteins, was performed on thin sections of cells grown under normal conditions (A–C) and old cells (D). To the Right of each micrograph, a model is drawn to help distinguish the locations of gold particles. (E) Percentage of labeled NPCs (positive control), lipid droplets (negative control), and NEB events are plotted. Data for unstressed cells is shown in black, and for old cells in gray. Lipid droplets and NEB events were rarely labeled in contrast to the highly labeled NPCs. (F) A 25-nm-thick slice of NEB in a tomographic reconstruction of S. cerevisiae. Both nuclear membranes are clearly visible surrounding a vesicle within the perinuclear space. In all slices of the tomogram, the membrane of this vesicle is complete and not continuous with either nuclear membrane. (G) Three-dimensional model of the NEB event contained in F. Nuclear membranes are presented in orange color and the transporting material in pink. n is equal to the number of examined structures. Scale bars: 200 nm (A–D); 100 nm (F and G). Abbreviations: APS, autophagosomes; LD, lipid droplet; N, nucleus; NEB, nuclear envelope budding; and NPC, nuclear pore complex. Black arrows indicate NEB events; asterisks indicate NPCs. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs. NPCs (positive control).

To further support this distinction between NEB and herniation, a comparison of the detailed morphology of NEB events with the previously reported herniations was accomplished through dual-axis electron tomography of the nuclear envelope in S. cerevisiae. This analysis showed that the selected NEB event was completely enveloped in a lipid bilayer and wedged in between the two nuclear membranes (Fig. 4 F and G). Moreover, the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction revealed that the vesicle contained between the lipid membranes was complete and was not attached to either nuclear membrane by a “neck” with only the outer nuclear membrane extending toward the cytoplasm. As such, this morphology was strikingly different to that previously identified as associated with the misassembly of NPCs (77). It is also noteworthy that the 3D reconstruction did not show an obvious connection of the NEB events with the ER, separating these two compartments. A different morphology of nuclear envelope–ER connections in comparison with the NEB events can also be seen in the acquired thin sections of nuclei (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). As such, both the immuno-EM results and the 3D morphology of NEB events suggest that the partial or incomplete assembly of NPC and NEB are distinct structures. However, the possibility that a small fraction of the protrusions quantified as NEB events in this study may be better assigned NPC-related structures remains.

The NEB Pathway Is Part of Normal Cellular Function from Humans to Protists.

To gain insights into the evolutionary conservation of NEB, we imaged and quantified NEB events in thin sections of nuclei in human mast cells (HMC-1), C. elegans nematodes, two yeast species (S. cerevisiae and S. pombe), as well as the parasitic protozoan T. brucei using EM (Fig. 5A). Since the HMC-1 nucleus has a diameter of ∼8 µm (Fig. 5B), we chose to examine sections corresponding to a little more than one nuclear volume (8-µm/70-nm-thick sections ∼ 114 serial sections/nucleus). By the same logic, the number of thin sections examined corresponded to approximately four total nuclear volumes of T. brucei and S. pombe and five nuclear volumes of C. elegans and S. cerevisiae cells. For C. elegans, images of nuclei were acquired from intestinal cells and oocytes.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The NEB pathway is part of normal cellular function from humans to protists. Thin sections containing nuclei were examined for the presence of NEB events in five different organisms in wild-type cells grown under normal conditions. (A) Percentage of nuclei containing NEB events. NEB events were either outward protruding (type 1), inward protruding (type 2), or did not protrude more in either direction but clearly contained a particle in the perinuclear space (type 3). NEB was observed in (B) HMC-1 cells (n = 122), (C) C. elegans (n = 138), (D) T. brucei (n = 119), (E) S. cerevisiae (n = 161), and (F) S. pombe (n = 101) by EM. Scale bars: 2 μm (B), 200 nm (C and F), 500 nm (D), and 300 nm (E). Abbreviations: HMC-1, human mast cell line 1; N, nucleus; NEB, nuclear envelope budding. Black arrows indicate NEB events.

In HMC-1 cells, three morphologically different categories of NEBs were observed (Fig. 5A). The most commonly observed morphology was outward protruding buds, occurring in 7.3% of nuclear sections (n = 9; Fig. 5 A and B), which will hereafter be referred to as type 1 NEB. In a few cases of type 1 NEB events, both the outer and inner membranes expand toward the cytoplasm with electron-dense material partially wrapped by the nuclear envelope bud and the protrusion is open to the nucleoplasm (Fig. 5B). In most of the type 1 NEB events, however (n = 6), the electron-dense material is clearly located between the two membranes with only the outer membrane expanding toward the cytoplasm. The second type of NEB events observed had the inner nuclear envelope expanding toward the nucleoplasm. These were termed type 2 NEB events and occurred in 3.3% of sections. Finally, for type 3 NEB events, the transported material is situated between the nuclear membranes with no clear protrusion in either direction. This occurred in 2.5% of sections. Some thin sections of nuclear envelopes contained more than one bud, revealing that NEB can occur at multiple sites on the same nucleus (SI Appendix, Fig. S1).

NEB events are observed to occur in all five organisms examined (Fig. 5A) but with varying frequency. The lowest frequency of NEB events was in S. cerevisiae (2.5%; n = 161 sections), followed by S. pombe (6.9%; n = 101 sections), T. brucei (8.4%; n = 119 sections), C. elegans (11.6%; n = 138 sections), and most frequently in HMC-1 cells (13.1%; n = 122). Only type 1 NEB events were identified in all organisms other than HMC-1 (Fig. 5 B–E), except for a single event in S. pombe that we classified as type 3 (Fig. 5F). The morphology of the NEB events varied between and within species, with some buds being small and having indistinct electron-dense material whereas other events were large and had a membrane surrounding the material. The average size of the NEB events did not show a large variation between species except for HMC-1 cells, which yielded distinctly larger buds (SI Appendix, Fig. S6).

The morphology of NEB was compared in more detail through electron tomography reconstructions of NEB events from both S. pombe and T. brucei. In S. pombe, one event of type 1 NEB was visualized (Fig. 6 A–C) whereas two type 1 NEB events were reconstructed from T. brucei (Fig. 6 D–H). The NEB event that appeared to have progressed the furthest had distinct regions of higher electron density surrounding the base of the bud (Fig. 6G, black arrow). For both S. pombe and T. brucei, the cargoes of the NEB events were found between, and fully separated from, the nuclear membranes, and were similar to what was observed in S. cerevisiae (Fig. 4G). Moreover, the NEB event observed for S. pombe clearly displayed the presence of a lipid bilayer that completely enveloped the cargo (Fig. 6B). However, a clear bilayer surrounding the transported material could not be ascertained in the T. brucei tomographic reconstruction. Since in many cases the transported material appeared to have a vesicle-like structure, we tested for an involvement of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway known to facilitate the formation of cellular vesicles, and already implicated in the formation of morphologically similar protrusions of the nuclear envelope (78, 79). However, ESCRT components did not appear to contribute to the formation of NEB events in our experiments (SI Appendix, Fig. S7).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Three-dimensional (3D) architecture of NEB events of S. pombe and T. brucei visualized with electron tomography. (A and D) The 1.5-nm-thick slices of S. pombe and T. brucei tomographical reconstructions showing NEB events (black boxes). A second NEB event in T. brucei, not clearly visible in the presented tomographic tilt, is located on the left lower part of the nucleus (dashed black box). (B and E) The 15-nm-thick zoomed-in views of the NEB events in S. pombe and T. brucei. In S. pombe, a lipid bilayer is surrounding the transported material, whereas in T. brucei the density is surrounded by the nuclear membranes only. (G) Second NEB event of T. brucei (acquired at the tomographic tilt that allowed best visualization of this NEB event). Electron-dense particles are observed around the neck of the bud (black arrow). (C, F, and H) Reconstructed 3D models of the NEB events. Nuclear membranes are presented in orange color and the transporting material in pink. Scale bars: 500 nm (A and D) and 100 nm (B, C, and E–H). Abbreviations: N, nucleus; NEB, nuclear envelope budding.

We conclude that NEB was observed in all species examined in this study. Our findings combined with previous published observations are summarized into a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 7), illustrating how the NEB pathway is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotes and is part of normal cellular function in an evolutionarily diverse sampling of species.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Phylogenetic tree of the species where NEB events have previously been observed. The phylogenetic relationships between the species are presented as a horizontal cladogram with the root to the Left. Species indicated with blue color are from this study. References, presented from 1 to 13, respectively, are as follows: refs. 17, 18, 14, 16, 15, 29, 19, 25, 21, 20, 23, 24, 22. All sketches were drawn by D.P.

Discussion

NEB has been observed since 1955 as nuclear herniations across a diverse range of organisms and at different developmental stages. This phenomenon is well studied with regard to its role in virus infection and the detailed structure of NEB events has been revealed using cryo-electron tomography of infected cells (11). However, NEB remains viewed as an irregularity rather than a normal route for transport over the nuclear envelope in healthy mature cells. We present here three different lines of evidence that NEB is a widely conserved, physiologically normal cellular process that increases in frequency due to cellular stress and is specifically activated by an increase in protein aggregation. First, we observed that five distinct stress conditions—heat shock, hydrogen peroxide, arsenite, proteasome inhibition, and AZC treatment—all led to an increase in the frequency of NEB, with the AZC treatment most prominently activating the NEB pathway among all stressors. Second, immuno-EM revealed the presence of ubiquitin and Hsp104, a protein disaggregase, in the cargo of the buds, which supports our hypothesis that this pathway is involved in protein degradation. Third, NEB events were detected in every species examined, from T. brucei to human cell line HMC-1. Collectively, these results suggest a role of the NEB pathway in protein quality control and highlight its evolutionary conservation. These observations shed light on the cell’s mechanism to cope with proteotoxic stress and identify a module of the nuclear quality control system. Moreover, since the NEB pathway is evolutionarily conserved and is also present in human cells, this work provides a perspective for studying cellular stress response-related human diseases (80).

Nuclear Budding and the Protein Quality Control System.

Although chaperones and the ubiquitin–proteasome system are known to clear misfolded proteins from the nucleus (81, 82), the nuclear protein quality control system is not as well characterized as the cytosolic and the ER systems (39). Various cellular events and pathways have been described whereby aggregated proteins and chaperones are imported from the cytosol and into the nucleus and these pathways are consistent with observations that 80% of the proteasomes at steady state are located within the nucleus (83, 84). An alternative pathway, however, has also been reported for which ubiquitinated proteins in mammalian cells and in the nematode C. elegans are transported from the nucleus to the cytosol via a ubiquitin-associated domain-containing protein (UBIN) (85).

Some proteins that exceed the size limit of the NPCs may nevertheless enter the complex after a reversible conformational change in their tertiary structure (86). Although large aggregates could potentially be transported in a similar manner, it stands to reason that under conditions of cellular stress, the transportation of many aggregates through NEB events would provide a more efficient and therefore advantageous gateway into or out of the nucleus. In support of the above supposition, a process called “piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus” has been described in S. cerevisiae in which nuclear envelope buds are released directly into the vacuole lumen for degradation (49).

Our observations that NEB increases during five different cellular stresses (heat shock, hydrogen peroxide, arsenite, proteasome inhibition, and AZC exposure) in S. cerevisiae strongly implicate that NEB is related to the protein quality control system. Aging has been previously shown to influence the formation of NEB-like events in the perinuclear space (54), with an apparent increase in replicatively aged cells of about 17% when compared to the remaining young population (stated as mixed population). Although the isolation method we used in this study involved a higher number of isolation steps in comparison with the aforementioned literature, we were unable to reproduce the difference in NEB frequency between the old and young population. There was a significant increase in both isolated cell groups with a stronger effect on the aged cells. Possible reasons for the inability to reproduce what has been shown before could be due to the differences in the isolation process. Conclusions that can be safely extracted are that mechanical stress is also able to increase NEB frequency and aging most likely creates a further stressful environment for the cells.

The presence of ubiquitin and Hsp104 in the NEB events lends further support for this functionality due to the fact that ubiquitin is involved in many protein quality control pathways including the ubiquitin–proteasome system and macroautophagy, and Hsp104 is known to mediate disaggregation of misfolded proteins (8789). The large increase in NEB events due to the AZC treatment reinforces this putative role of NEB as a cellular stress response. Since AZC acts upon protein conformational stability directly without influencing other parameters such as the external temperature or membrane fluidity, these experiments constitute a more targeted challenge for the protein quality control system. Additionally, in a previous study where aggregated proteins were identified after cellular stress induced by AZC, arsenite, and hydrogen peroxide treatment, AZC had the largest number of affected proteins among the stressors (58). A strong effect of AZC on the folding of proteins could explain why NEB is more prominent in the AZC-induced stress response when compared to the cellular response to other stressors.

Finally, the connection between proteasomal activity and NEB frequency supports the association with the protein quality control system. Inhibition of proteasomal activity showed a clear increase in NEB events, which could be translated as a cellular attempt to cope with a large number of misfolded proteins or proteins that are normally degraded by the proteasome. Most of the NEB events recorded in the rpn4Δ strain had a distinct morphology compared to NEB events triggered by other stressors. This observation may reflect a difference in the nature and composition of the transported material, indicating that NEB may well be involved in more than one cellular activity.

The Distinction between NEB Events and Defective NPCs.

Deleting key genes required for NPC assembly can induce nuclear envelope “herniations” that appear somewhat similar in structure to NEB events (7376, 90, 91). These herniations are believed to arise from the outer nuclear membrane sealing above the defective NPC, thereby capturing the transported material between the NPC and the nuclear envelope and creating a bulge resembling a budding vesicle. If this phenomenon underpinned our observed NEB events, the intermembrane vesicle should be connected to the INM where the defective NPC is located. A connection between the INM and intermembrane vesicle resembling a “neck” would also be a plausible intermediate state in the formation of a vesicle from the INM that encloses nuclear material. Such neck-like connections between the INM and contents of the bud were previously observed in strains deficient in TorA, an ER protein with ATPase activity, and various Nups that lead to defective NPCs (31, 73, 74). Furthermore, the size of the necks seen in NEB events after hyperactivation of Chm7, a component of the ESCRT-III–like complex, and misassembled NPCs were compared previously, and it was concluded that while appearing similar, both features were morphologically distinct (79). Neck-like or NPC-like structures connecting the intermembrane vesicles to the INM were not visible in any of our acquired tomograms, suggesting that our tomograms contain buds in which the intermembrane vesicle or material has fully formed and these buds are not the result of NPC malformation. In addition to these morphological differences revealed by 3D tomographic reconstructions, the immuno-EM assay demonstrated that the NEB events were not associated with NPCs since only 2 of the 16 observed events in this assay were labeled for NPC proteins.

The Evolutionarily Conserved Nature of NEB.

We observed NEB events within the cells of all species we examined including animals, fungi, and protozoa. There is a thread stretching back through the scientific literature that shows that NEB events have repeatedly been observed in animals, plants, and protists (SI Appendix, Table S1). The genetic diversity of these observations is summarized in Fig. 7, which presents a phylogenetic tree illustrating that NEB events have been observed for 18 different species within the eukaryotic domain. Therefore, despite NEB not being widely recognized as a means of nuclear transport, these observations combine to create a compelling argument that NEB is an evolutionarily conserved phenomenon of eukaryotic cells.

From our sequence of experiments using the model system S. cerevisiae, we concluded that NEB events facilitate the removal of aggregated proteins from the nucleus. This pathway could potentially also support the cotransportation of other cellular components required for protein degradation. Since NEB embodies an alternative route for transport over the nuclear envelope that has been largely overlooked, our observations highlight an opportunity for discovery in eukaryotic cell biology where a broad range of interconnected questions may emerge. It will be necessary to determine whether the frequency of NEB is also increased by cellular stressors in human cells, and in particular additional cellular stress associated with aging. One issue is the important role of protein aggregation within a variety of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (80, 92). Should NEB also be an underappreciated mechanism for the clearance of protein aggregates in human neurons, then this potentially has far-reaching neurological implications.

Materials and Methods

Please refer to SI Appendix, Tables S3–S6 for detailed information on materials and methods. Briefly, the information is as follows.

Experimental Models.

HMC-1 cells.

HMC-1 (93) cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium.

Trypanosoma brucei.

Procyclic T. brucei strain 427 was cultured in SDM-79 media with 20% fetal bovine serum. Cultures were prepared and maintained at a concentration of 5 × 105 and 1 × 107 cells per mL (9496).

Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Logarithmically growing wild-type fission yeast S. pombe was grown at 30 °C in YE5S medium (9799).

Caenorhabditis elegans.

The C. elegans wild-type strain was the Bristol N2 variety. The worms were cultured on normal growing media plates (NGM plates) and the E. coli strain OP50 was used as a food source.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Wild-type cells of S. cerevisiae (BY4741) were cultured in YPD media at 30 °C (100). A strain with endogenous HSP104 C-terminally tagged with GFP (101) was used for old cell isolation, heat shock, and sodium arsenite experiments. The deletion mutants hsp104Δ and rpn4Δ are from the YKO collection (EUROSCARF). Strains used for investigating involvement of the ESCRT pathway in NEB and the pdr5Δ strain are from this study (see yeast strains list in SI Appendix, Table S4). For the hydrogen peroxide experiment, cells were grown in synthetic complete media (with yeast nitrogen base, without amino acids, pH 5.5, complete supplement mixture of amino acids and 2% glucose).

High-Pressure Freezing for EM and Tomography.

All samples used in this study has been high-pressure frozen (Leica EM PACT1/2 or Wohlwend Compact 3) followed by freeze substitution in 2% uranyl acetate dissolved into acetone.

For tomography, serial semithick sections of about 210–250 nm (S. pombe) and 350 nm (T. brucei and S. cerevisiae) were cut and poststained with 2% UA in dH2O followed by Reynold’s lead citrate. Gold particles (15 nm) were applied to both sides of the grid as fiducial markers.

All other samples were sectioned in 70-nm thin sections and placed on either copper slot or mesh grids. Sections were stained with 2% UA and Reynold’s lead citrate (102).

Immuno-EM.

For the immunolabeling experiments, the same high-pressure frozen samples embedded in HM20 resin were used, a benefit of that short FS protocol (103). Grids with 70-nm-thick sections were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min and blocked with 0.1% fish skin gelatin and 0.8% BSA in PBS for 1 h. For primary antibody labeling, samples were incubated for 2 h or overnight with the appropriate antibody, followed by a 1-h incubation with a secondary gold antibody. Glutaraldehyde (2.5%) was applied to sections for 1 h followed by contrast staining as described above.

Image Acquisition and Electron Tomography.

All thin sections were imaged at 120 kV either on a LEO 912 OMEGA (Zeiss) equipped with a 2k × 2k VELETA Olympus CCD camera or on a Tecnai T12 transmission electron microscope equipped with a Ceta CMOS 16M camera (FEI). Tomograms were acquired with the use of serial EM (104) on a Tecnai F20 and F30 microscopes operated at 200 and 300 kV. The tomographic reconstruction was performed using the IMOD software package (105).

Isolation of Old Yeast Cells.

Isolation of old yeast cells was performed according to Smeal et al. (56) with some modifications in order to reduce mechanical stress and improve the cell morphology for EM (SI Appendix, Table S6).

Stress Treatments of S. cerevisiae.

Cells were grown at 30 °C to mid-exponential phase. For a mild heat shock, the culture was shifted to 38 °C and samples were collected after 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, and 90 min (106). The more severe heat shock was performed at 42 °C for 30 min. Cells were exposed to 0.6 mM hydrogen peroxide for 90 min, 0.5 mM sodium arsenite for 60 min, or 1 mg/mL AZC for 30 and 90 min.

Proteasome Inhibition.

The rpn4Δ and a wild-type strains were grown to mid-exponential phase and high-pressure frozen. The pdr5Δ strain was grown to mid-exponential phase prior to addition of either 50 μM MG132 (#C2211; Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in DMSO or an equivalent volume of DMSO. A 60-min incubation at 30 °C followed before cells were prepared for high-pressure freezing.

Analysis of Polyubiquitination.

Mid-exponentially grown yeast was washed once in distilled water and resuspended in 1 mL of lysis buffer. One hundred microliters of cleared lysate were mixed with the same volume of 2× Laemmli buffer and incubated for 15 min at 95 °C. The samples were then applied for SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting following standard protocols. Blots were decorated with an anti-ubiquitin antibody. Clarity Western ECL Substrate and a ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System were used for detection.

Analysis of Cell Death.

Loss of membrane integrity was assessed with PI staining as previously described (107).

Confocal Microscopy.

For visualization of nuclei, yeast cells were harvested and resuspended in DRAQ5 staining solution. Specimens were analyzed with a ZEISS LSM700 microscope. Micrographs were analyzed and processed with the open-source software Fiji (108).

Phylogenetic Tree.

A phylogenetic tree was generated based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information taxonomy browser for scientific names and visualized by the EvolView online software (https://www.evolgenius.info/evolview/#login).

Statistical Analysis.

The frequency of NEB events was calculated as the number of events per number of thin sections of nuclei. For the NPC immuno-EM assay, different cell compartments were categorized as labeled or not labeled based on the presence or absence of gold particles. For the statistical analysis, a nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed using the MATLAB multiparadigm programming language. For the ubiquitin and Hsp104-GFP immuno-EM, the area and number of gold particles of different cell compartments were measured using IMOD (https://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/). All data are presented as bar graphs. For cell death analysis, results are displayed either as dot plots (if n ≤ 5) where mean, median, and SEM are depicted, or as box plots (if n > 5) with mean and median as well as whiskers presenting minima and maxima within 2.2 interquartile range. A Student t test was used to compare between two groups and displayed significances are two-sided, and a one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc test was applied to compare between three and more groups.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
pnas.2020997118.sapp.pdf (24.4MB, pdf)
Supplementary File
Download video file (12.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (15.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (30MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (7.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (172KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (119.6KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (124KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (88.4KB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Swedish Research Council Grant 2015-00560 and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation Grants KAW 2012.0284 and KAW 2014.0275 (to R.N.); Swedish Research Council Grants 621-2014-4597 and 2018-03577 (to M.J.T.); Swedish Research Council Young Investigator Grant 2015-05427 and the Austrian Science Fund (J4342-B21) (to V.K.); Swedish Research Council Grant 2019-04004 (to J.L.H.); and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Grant KAW 2017.0091 (to T.N. and J.L.H.). We thank Marc Pilon for providing the C. elegans worms and for contributing intellectually to the manuscript writing. Furthermore, we thank Rebecca Andersson for her help in conducting the hydrogen peroxide experiment and Per Widlund for reagents. We also thank Claes Andreasson, Per Widlund, and Martin Ott for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2020997118/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability

EM images have been deposited in the Cell Image Library (http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50813; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50818; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50832; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50841; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50849; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50873; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50882; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50888; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50900; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50906; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50920; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50935; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50945).

References

  • 1.Watson M. L., Pores in the mammalian nuclear membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 15, 475–479 (1954). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kabachinski G., Schwartz T. U., The nuclear pore complex—structure and function at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 128, 423–429 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck M., Hurt E., The nuclear pore complex: Understanding its function through structural insight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 73–89 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chook Y. M., Blobel G., Karyopherins and nuclear import. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 703–715 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoelz A., Debler E. W., Blobel G., The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613–643 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schmidt H. B., Görlich D., Transport selectivity of nuclear pores, phase separation, and membraneless organelles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 46–61 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garcia-Bustos J., Heitman J., Hall M. N., Nuclear protein localization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1071, 83–101 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Terry L. J., Shows E. B., Wente S. R., Crossing the nuclear envelope: Hierarchical regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science 318, 1412–1416 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Köhler A., Hurt E., Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 761–773 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schwartz J., Roizman B., Concerning the egress of herpes simplex virus from infected cells: Electron and light microscope observations. Virology 38, 42–49 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hagen C., et al., Structural basis of vesicle formation at the inner nuclear membrane. Cell 163, 1692–1701 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fradkin L. G., Budnik V., This bud’s for you: Mechanisms of cellular nucleocytoplasmic trafficking via nuclear envelope budding. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 41, 125–131 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang I. H., Burckhardt C. J., Yakimovich A., Greber U. F., Imaging, tracking and computational analyses of virus entry and egress with the cytoskeleton. Viruses 10, 166 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Longwell A. C., Yerganian G., Some observations on nuclear budding and nuclear extrusions in a Chinese hamster cell culture. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 34, 53–69 (1965). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elston R. N., Stenkvist B., Quantitative estimation of nuclear buds and micronuclei in bovine cells transformed by Rous sarcoma and SV 40 viruses. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 68, 543–549 (1965). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hadek R., Swift H., Nuclear extrusion and intracisternal inclusions in the rabbit blastocyst. J. Cell Biol. 13, 445–451 (1962). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Szollosi D., Extrusion of nucleoli from pronuclei of the rat. J. Cell Biol. 25, 545–562 (1965). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Szöllösi M. S., Szöllösi D., “Blebbing” of the nuclear envelope of mouse zygotes, early embryos and hybrid cells. J. Cell Sci. 91, 257–267 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gay H., Nucleo-cytoplasmic relations in salivary-gland cells of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41, 370–375 (1955). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mepham R. H., Lane G. R., Observations on the fine structure of developing microspores of Tradescantia bracteata. Protoplasma 70, 1–20 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gullvåg B. M., Release of nuclear material during the development of Lycopodium annotinum L. spores. Grana 10, 31–34 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Afzelius B. A., The nucleus of Noctiluca scintillans: Aspects of nucleocytoplasmic exchanges and the formation of nuclear membrane. J. Cell Biol. 19, 229–238 (1963). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dickinson H. G., Nucleo-cytoplasmic interaction following meiosis in the young microspores of Lilium longiflorum; events at the nuclear envelope. Grana 11, 117–127 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dickinson H. G., Bell P. R., Nucleocytoplasmic interaction at the nuclear envelope in post meiotic microspores of Pinus banksiana. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 33, 356–359 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Aldrich H. C., Vasil I. K., Ultrastructure of the postmeiotic nuclear envelope in microspores of Podocarpus macrophyllus. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 32, 307–315 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hochstrasser M., Sedat J. W., Three-dimensional organization of Drosophila melanogaster interphase nuclei. II. Chromosome spatial organization and gene regulation. J. Cell Biol. 104, 1471–1483 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verboon J. M., et al., Wash and the wash regulatory complex function in nuclear envelope budding. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs.243576 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Speese S. D., et al., Nuclear envelope budding enables large ribonucleoprotein particle export during synaptic Wnt signaling. Cell 149, 832–846 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.LaMassa N., Arenas-Mena C., Phillips G. R., Electron microscopic characterization of nuclear egress in the sea urchin gastrula. J. Morphol. 279, 609–615 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hatch E. M., Hetzer M. W., RNP export by nuclear envelope budding. Cell 149, 733–735 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jokhi V., et al., Torsin mediates primary envelopment of large ribonucleoprotein granules at the nuclear envelope. Cell Rep. 3, 988–995 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ding B., Mirza A. M., Ashley J., Budnik V., Munson M., Nuclear export through nuclear envelope remodeling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2017). 10.1101/224055 (Accessed 22 November 2017). [DOI]
  • 33.Rose A., Schlieker C., Alternative nuclear transport for cellular protein quality control. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 509–514 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Öling D., Eisele F., Kvint K., Nyström T., Opposing roles of Ubp3-dependent deubiquitination regulate replicative life span and heat resistance. EMBO J. 33, 747–761 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Erjavec N., Larsson L., Grantham J., Nyström T., Accelerated aging and failure to segregate damaged proteins in Sir2 mutants can be suppressed by overproducing the protein aggregation-remodeling factor Hsp104p. Genes Dev. 21, 2410–2421 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dubnikov T., Ben-Gedalya T., Cohen E., Protein quality control in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a023523 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Basu A. K., Damage D. N. A., Mutagenesis and cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 970 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shor E., Fox C. A., Broach J. R., The yeast environmental stress response regulates mutagenesis induced by proteotoxic stress. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003680 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shibata Y., Morimoto R. I., How the nucleus copes with proteotoxic stress. Curr. Biol. 24, R463–R474 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Panté N., Kann M., Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 425–434 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wente S. R., Rout M. P., The nuclear pore complex and nuclear transport. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000562 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mehrtash A. B., Hochstrasser M., Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation at the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 93, 111–124 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mannhaupt G., Schnall R., Karpov V., Vetter I., Feldmann H., Rpn4p acts as a transcription factor by binding to PACE, a nonamer box found upstream of 26S proteasomal and other genes in yeast. FEBS Lett. 450, 27–34 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Koch B., Yu H. G., Regulation of inner nuclear membrane associated protein degradation. Nucleus 10, 169–180 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deng M., Hochstrasser M., Spatially regulated ubiquitin ligation by an ER/nuclear membrane ligase. Nature 443, 827–831 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Boban M., Pantazopoulou M., Schick A., Ljungdahl P. O., Foisner R., A nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome pathway targets the inner nuclear membrane protein Asi2 for degradation. J. Cell Sci. 127, 3603–3613 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Foresti O., Rodriguez-Vaello V., Funaya C., Carvalho P., Quality control of inner nuclear membrane proteins by the Asi complex. Science 346, 751–755 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.O’Driscoll J., Clare D., Saibil H., Prion aggregate structure in yeast cells is determined by the Hsp104-Hsp110 disaggregase machinery. J. Cell Biol. 211, 145–158 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roberts P., et al., Piecemeal microautophagy of nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 129–141 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lum R., Tkach J. M., Vierling E., Glover J. R., Evidence for an unfolding/threading mechanism for protein disaggregation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 29139–29146 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Comyn S. A., Young B. P., Loewen C. J., Mayor T., Prefoldin promotes proteasomal degradation of cytosolic proteins with missense mutations by maintaining substrate solubility. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006184–e1006184 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Folch-Mallol J. L., Garay-Arroyo A., Lledías F., Covarrubias Robles A. A., The stress response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol. 46, 24–46 (2004). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Haigis M. C., Yankner B. A., The aging stress response. Mol. Cell 40, 333–344 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rempel I. L., et al., Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore assembly in mitotic cells decreases transport dynamics. eLife 8, e48186 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Josefson R., Andersson R., Nyström T., How and why do toxic conformers of aberrant proteins accumulate during ageing? Essays Biochem. 61, 317–324 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Smeal T., Claus J., Kennedy B., Cole F., Guarente L., Loss of transcriptional silencing causes sterility in old mother cells of S. cerevisiae. Cell 84, 633–642 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jacobson T., et al., Arsenite interferes with protein folding and triggers formation of protein aggregates in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5073–5083 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Weids A. J., Ibstedt S., Tamás M. J., Grant C. M., Distinct stress conditions result in aggregation of proteins with similar properties. Sci. Rep. 6, 24554 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zeng X.-C., et al., Hsp70 dynamics in vivo: Effect of heat shock and protein aggregation. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4991–5000 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fowden L., Richmond M. H., Replacement of proline by azetidine-2-carboxylic acid during biosynthesis of protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 71, 459–461 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Trotter E. W., et al., Misfolded proteins are competent to mediate a subset of the responses to heat shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 44817–44825 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Berke S. J. S., Paulson H. L., Protein aggregation and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway: Gaining the UPPer hand on neurodegeneration. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 253–261 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim P. K., Hailey D. W., Mullen R. T., Lippincott-Schwartz J., Ubiquitin signals autophagic degradation of cytosolic proteins and peroxisomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20567–20574 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pankiv S., et al., p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24131–24145 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Leppert G., et al., Cloning by gene amplification of two loci conferring multiple drug resistance in Saccharomyces. Genetics 125, 13–20 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Collins G. A., Gomez T. A., Deshaies R. J., Tansey W. P., Combined chemical and genetic approach to inhibit proteolysis by the proteasome. Yeast 27, 965–974 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xie Y., Varshavsky A., RPN4 is a ligand, substrate, and transcriptional regulator of the 26S proteasome: A negative feedback circuit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 3056–3061 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Parsell D. A., Kowal A. S., Singer M. A., Lindquist S., Protein disaggregation mediated by heat-shock protein Hsp104. Nature 372, 475–478 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Glover J. R., Lindquist S., Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40: A novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 94, 73–82 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tkach J. M., Glover J. R., Nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of the molecular chaperone Hsp104 in unstressed and heat-shocked cells. Traffic 9, 39–56 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Preston G. M., Guerriero C. J., Metzger M. B., Michaelis S., Brodsky J. L., Substrate insolubility dictates Hsp104-dependent endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation. Mol. Cell 70, 242–253.e6 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thaller D. J., Patrick Lusk C., Fantastic nuclear envelope herniations and where to find them. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 877–889 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wente S. R., Blobel G., A temperature-sensitive NUP116 null mutant forms a nuclear envelope seal over the yeast nuclear pore complex thereby blocking nucleocytoplasmic traffic. J. Cell Biol. 123, 275–284 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wente S. R., Blobel G., NUP145 encodes a novel yeast glycine-leucine-phenylalanine-glycine (GLFG) nucleoporin required for nuclear envelope structure. J. Cell Biol. 125, 955–969 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Allegretti M., et al., In-cell architecture of the nuclear pore and snapshots of its turnover. Nature 586, 796–800 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lee C.-W., et al., Selective autophagy degrades nuclear pore complexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 159–166 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Otsuka S., et al., Nuclear pore assembly proceeds by an inside-out extrusion of the nuclear envelope. eLife 5, e19071 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vietri M., Radulovic M., Stenmark H., The many functions of ESCRTs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 25–42 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Thaller D. J., et al., An ESCRT-LEM protein surveillance system is poised to directly monitor the nuclear envelope and nuclear transport system. eLife 8, e45284 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liguori I., et al., Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin. Interv. Aging 13, 757–772 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.von Mikecz A., Chen M., Rockel T., Scharf A., The nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome system: Visualization of proteasomes, protein aggregates, and proteolysis in the cell nucleus. Methods Mol. Biol. 463, 191–202 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nielsen S. V., Poulsen E. G., Rebula C. A., Hartmann-Petersen R., Protein quality control in the nucleus. Biomolecules 4, 646–661 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Prasad R., Kawaguchi S., Ng D. T. W., A nucleus-based quality control mechanism for cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2117–2127 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Park S. H., et al., PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 154, 134–145 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hirayama S., et al., Nuclear export of ubiquitinated proteins via the UBIN-POST system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E4199–E4208 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yoshimura S. H., Kumeta M., Takeyasu K., Structural mechanism of nuclear transport mediated by importin β and flexible amphiphilic proteins. Structure 22, 1699–1710 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Shaid S., Brandts C. H., Serve H., Dikic I., Ubiquitination and selective autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 20, 21–30 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kalejta R. F., Shenk T., Proteasome-dependent, ubiquitin-independent degradation of the Rb family of tumor suppressors by the human cytomegalovirus pp71 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 3263–3268 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yokom A. L., et al., Spiral architecture of the Hsp104 disaggregase reveals the basis for polypeptide translocation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 830–837 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Scarcelli J. J., Hodge C. A., Cole C. N., The yeast integral membrane protein Apq12 potentially links membrane dynamics to assembly of nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 178, 799–812 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Webster B. M., et al., Chm7 and Heh1 collaborate to link nuclear pore complex quality control with nuclear envelope sealing. EMBO J. 35, 2447–2467 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Aguzzi A., O’Connor T., Protein aggregation diseases: Pathogenicity and therapeutic perspectives. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 237–248 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Butterfield J. H., Weiler D., Dewald G., Gleich G. J., Establishment of an immature mast cell line from a patient with mast cell leukemia. Leuk. Res. 12, 345–355 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Höög J. L., Gluenz E., Vaughan S., Gull K., Ultrastructural investigation methods for Trypanosoma brucei. Methods Cell Biol. 96, 175–196 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Höög J. L., et al., Modes of flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Trypanosoma brucei. eLife 3, e01479 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Höög J. L., et al., 3D architecture of the Trypanosoma brucei flagella connector, a mobile transmembrane junction. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004312 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zabeo D., et al., Exosomes purified from a single cell type have diverse morphology. J. Extracell. Vesicles 6, 1329476 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Höög J. L., et al., Organization of interphase microtubules in fission yeast analyzed by electron tomography. Dev. Cell 12, 349–361 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Höög J. L., Antony C., Whole‐cell investigation of microtubule cytoskeleton architecture by electron tomography. Methods Cell Biol. 79, 145–167 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hill S. M., et al., Asymmetric inheritance of aggregated proteins and age reset in yeast are regulated by Vac17-dependent vacuolar functions. Cell Rep. 16, 826–838 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Huh W. K., et al., Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686–691 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Reynolds E. S., The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hawes P., Netherton C. L., Mueller M., Wileman T., Monaghan P., Rapid freeze-substitution preserves membranes in high-pressure frozen tissue culture cells. J. Microsc. 226, 182–189 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mastronarde D. N., Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kremer J. R., Mastronarde D. N., McIntosh J. R., Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Keuenhof K. S., et al., Large organellar changes occur during mild heat shock in yeast. J. Cell Sci. (2021) in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Aufschnaiter A., et al., The enzymatic core of the Parkinson’s disease-associated protein LRRK2 impairs mitochondrial biogenesis in aging yeast. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 205 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Schindelin J., et al., Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
pnas.2020997118.sapp.pdf (24.4MB, pdf)
Supplementary File
Download video file (12.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (15.9MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (30MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (7.4MB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (172KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (119.6KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (124KB, mp4)
Supplementary File
Download video file (88.4KB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

EM images have been deposited in the Cell Image Library (http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50813; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50818; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50832; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50841; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50849; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50873; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50882; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50888; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50900; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50906; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50920; http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/50935; http://cellimagelibrary.org/images/50945).


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES