Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Turkish Journal of Chemistry logoLink to Turkish Journal of Chemistry
. 2021 Jun 30;45(3):835–844. doi: 10.3906/kim-2101-12

Synthesis and antioxidant activities of new nickel(II) complexes derived from 4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methyl/propyl thiosemicarbazones

Songül EĞLENCE-BAKIR 1
PMCID: PMC8326484  PMID: 34385870

Abstract

Six nickel(II) complexes of the N2O2 chelating thiosemicarbazones were synthesized using N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methyl/propyl thiosemicarbazone and methoxy-substitute-salicylaldehydes in the presence of Ni(II) ion by template reaction. The structures of thiosemicarbazones and nickel(II) complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, UV-Vis, IR, and 1H-NMR spectroscopies. The structure of the N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propyl thiosemicarbazone ( 2 ) was determined by X-ray single-crystal diffraction method. The total antioxidant capacities of synthesized compounds were evaluated by using cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method. The thiosemicarbazones exhibited more potent antioxidant capacity than Ni(II) complexes. Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) of 1c was found highest in tested nickel(II) complexes. In addition, antioxidant activities of tested compounds were evaluated by using the hydroxyl radical, DPPH radical, and ABTS radical scavenging abilities of these compounds.

Keywords: Thiosemicarbazone, nickel(II) complex, structural analysis, antioxidant capacity, radical scavenging activity

1. Introduction

Thiosemicarbazide, N1H2–NH–C(=S)–N4H2, is an important precursor used in the synthesis of many polydentate ligands [1–3]. The reactivity of its two terminal amino groups differ from each other [4]. The amino functional group of the molecule (N1H2-) is more reactive and easily condenses with the 2-hydroxy/amino substitute carbonyl compounds to form schiff bases [5–7]; whereas, the thioamidic group (-N4H2) has a very weak potential to react with carbonyl compounds. However, by performing a double-condensation reaction in the presence of transition metal ions having template effect and a second carbonyl molecule, thiosemicarbazone-metal complexes with tetradentate coordination can be obtained [8–10]. These compounds were first synthesized and characterized in 1971 [11].

The biological activities of thiosemicarbazones and their metal complexes have been known for a long time [12–15]. In addition, there is a significant amount of published studies describing the role of their uses as sensors [16,17], optics [18], and catalysts [19]. Many studies have revealed that the activities depend on the type of metal and the substituted groups attached to hydrazine, amide and sulfur atoms [20,21]. Therefore, it becomes important to systematically synthesize and examine compounds with different groups on both the aromatic ring and the amide and sulfur atoms. When the biological activity studies of thiosemicarbazone and metal complexes are examined, studies containing antioxidant activity are remarkable. In studies examining the antioxidant activities of thiosemicarbazones and nickel (II) complexes containing –OH groups in the aromatic rings, 3/4–hydroxy salicylaldehyde or 2,2′-dihydroxybenzophenone, it was observed that the activity was high due to the presence of these groups [22–24]. In order to examine how methoxy and benzyloxy groups affect the antioxidant activity; we synthesized six new nickel(II) complexes (Figure 1) using N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methyl/proyl-thiosemicarbazones and 3-, 4-, and 5-methoxy salicylaldehydes. The structure of the N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propyl thiosemicarbazone ( 2 ) has been determined by X-ray diffraction method. Besides, we examined the antioxidant capacities and radical scavenging activities of the free thiosemicarbazones and nickel(II) complexes in vitro assays for summarize their biochemical properties.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Synthesis scheme for the nickel(II) complexes.

1a : (R1:CH3; R2: 3-OCH3); 1b: (R1:CH3; R2: 4-OCH3); 1c: (R1:CH3; R2: 5-OCH3)

2a: (R1:C3H7; R2: 3-OCH3); 2b: (R1:C3H7; R2: 4-OCH3); 2c: (R1:C3H7; R2: 5-OCH3)

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials and physical measurements

The chemicals used were of reagent grade and used without purification. Analytical data were determined on a Thermo-Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series Elementary Analyzer. Electronic spectra of the compounds were recorded at 5×10–5 M concentration in CHCL3 solution with a Shimadzu 2600 UV-Vis Spectrometer. Infrared spectra were obtained on an Agilent Carry 630 FTIR-ATR spectrophotometer in range of 4000 to 400 cm−1 at room temperature. 1H-NMR spectra were performed on a Bruker Avance-500 model spectrometer relative to SiMe4. The X-ray data were recorded on a Bruker APEX II QUAZAR three-circle diffractometer.

2.2. Synthesis of thiosemicarbazones

The thiosemicarbazones were obtained according to literature methods with small modifications [25], and synthesis procedure was described as follows by the N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazone ( 1 ) as representative example. 0.5 g (5 mmol) thiosemicarbazide and 0.33 mL (5 mmol) methyl iodide were refluxed in 10 mL ethanol for 2 h. Three milliliters of ethanolic solution of 4-benzyloxysalicylaldehyde (1.25 g, 5 mmol) was added. The mixture was refluxed two more hours and allowed to stand at room temperature overnight. The separated yellow precipitate was filtered, washed several times with cold ethanol and dried under vacuum. The N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propyl thiosemicarbazone ( 2 ) was obtained by using 1-bromopropane (5 mmol, 0.45 mL) with the same procedure. Hydrohalide forms of the thiosemicarbazones were used in the synthesis of complexes. The colors, m.p. (°C), yields (%), elemental analyzes, UV-Vis, IR and 1H-NMR data of the thiosemicarbazones are given as follows:

N 1 -4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazone (1): Light yellow, 134°C, 63%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C16H18IN3O2S (443.30 g/mol) C, 43.21 (43.35); H, 4.19 (4.09); N, 9.33 (9.48); S, 7.65 (7.53)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 240 (2480); 294 (2300); 305 (2840). IR (ATR, cm-1): υ (OH) 3457; υ s(NH2) 3281; ʋ(CH) aliph. 2786, 2646; υ (C=N1) 1602. 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.53, 11.31 (s, 1H, i:2/1, OH ); 8.33, 8.20 (s, 1H, i:2/1 CH=N 1 ); 7.39-7.07 (m, 8H, aromatics ); 6.51 (m, 2H, NH 2 ); 5.03 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 2.48 (s, 3H, S-C H 3 ).

N 1 -4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazone (2): Light yellow, 115°C, 66%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C18H22BrN3O2S (424.35 g/mol) C, 50.81 (50.95); H, 5.19 (5.23); N, 9.73 (9.90); S, 7.65 (7.56)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 240 (6900); 294 (6440); 305 (7800). IR (ATR, cm-1): υ (OH) 3365; υ s(NH2) 3332; ʋ(CH) aliph. 2879, 2791; υ (C=N1) 1539. 1H NMR (CDCl3): 11.76, 11.56 (s, 1H, i:1/2, OH ); 8.31, 8.18 (s, 1H, i:2/1 CH=N 1 ); 7.39-7.06 (m, 8H, aromatics ); 6.50 (m, 2H, NH 2 ); 5.01 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.00, 2.98 (t, 2H, i:3/1, J:7.32 S-CH 2 - ); 1.68 (m, 2H, -CH 2 - ); 1.02, 0.81 (t, 3H, J:7.32, i:2/1, - CH 3 ).

2.3. Synthesis of the complexes

The nickel(II) complexes were obtained according to literature methods with small modifications [6], and synthesis procedure was described as follows by the N1-benzyloxysalicylidene-N4-3-methoxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) ( 1a ) as representative example. N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazone (0.44 g, 1 mmol) and 3-methoxysalicylaldehyde (0.15 g, 1 mmol) were dissolved in 25 ml warm ethanol and added to the ethanolic solution of nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate (0.23 g, 1 mmol) by stirring. The mixture was stirred at 40 °C for two hours and than allowed to stand at room temperature for a few days. The red product was collected by filtration and washed with cold ethanol. The crystalline powders were dried over P2O5 under vacuum. The other nickel complexes were synthesized with the same procedure described above using N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazone and 4-/5-methoxy substitue salicylaldehydes. The colors, m.p. (°C), yields (%), elemental analyzes, UV-Vis, IR and 1H-NMR data of the nickel(II) complexes are given as follows:

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -3-methoxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (1a): Red, 270 °C, 72%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C24H21N3NiO4S (506.20 g/mol) C, 56.74 (56.95); H, 4.31 (4.18); N, 8.19 (8.30); S, 6.38 (6.33)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 240 (10860); 294 (10520); 305 (12960); 505 (6040). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2935, 2916; υ (C=N1) 1599; υ (C=N2) 1530.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.39, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.20, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.48-6.40 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.15 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.84 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 2.70 (s, 3H, S- CH 3 ).

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -4-methoxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (1b): Red, 284°C, 70%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C24H21N3NiO4S (506.20 g/mol) C, 56.81 (56.95); H, 4.27 (4.18); N, 8.22 (8.30); S, 6.26 (6.33)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 242 (7700); 295 (7920); 305 (9720); 499 (5880). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2901, 2866; υ (C=N1) 1539; υ (C=N2) 1500.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.34, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.06, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.65-6.39 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.14 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.81 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 2.68 (s, 3H, S- CH 3 ).

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -5-methoxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (1c): Red, 269°C, 69%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C24H21N3NiO4S (506.20 g/mol) C, 57.01 (56.95); H, 4.31 (4.18); N, 8.44 (8.30); S, 6.49 (6.33)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 242 (12260); 294 (12540); 305 (15460); 510 (6800). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2891, 2872; υ (C=N1) 1599; υ (C=N2) 1517.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.33, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.07, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.44-6.27 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.10 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.72 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 2.65 (s, 3H, S- CH 3 ).

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -3-methoxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (2a): Red, 197°C, 66%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C26H25N3NiO4S (534.25 g/mol) C, 58.31 (58.45); H, 4.63 (4.72); N, 8.01 (7.87); S, 6.19 (6.00)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 244 (7640); 294 (7880); 305 (9780); 522 (5160). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2927, 2861; υ (C=N1) 1536; υ (C=N2) 1498.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.39, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.28, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.49-6.41 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.15 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.75 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 3.28, (t, 2H, J:0.015, S-CH 2 - ); 1.77 (m, 2H, -CH 2 - ); 1.01 (t, J:0.014 3H, - CH 3 ).

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -4-methoxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (2b): Red, 186°C, 53%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C26H25N3NiO4S (534.25 g/mol) C, 58.51 (58.45); H, 4.59 (4.72); N, 7.81 (7.87); S, 5.86 (6.00)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 244 (9860); 294 (9878); 306 (12460); 509 (7860). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2926, 2866; υ (C=N1) 1597; υ (C=N2) 1590.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.31, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.08, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.63-6.37 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.13 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.81 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 3.24, (t, 2H,J:0.015, S-CH 2 - ); 1.72 (m, 2H, -CH 2 - ); 1.00 (t, 3H, J:0.017, - CH 3 ).

N 1 -benzyloxysalicylidene-N 4 -5-methoxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazidato nickel(II) (2c): Red, 205°C, 51%, Anal. Found (Calc.) for C26H25N3NiO4S (534.25 g/mol) C, 58.61 (58.45); H, 4.79 (4.72); N, 7.91 (7.87); S, 6.11 (6.00)%. UV-Vis (nm, log ε in parenthesis): 244 (9860); 294 (9870); 306 (12460); 511 (7860). IR (ATR, cm-1): ʋ(CH) aliph. 2928, 2866; υ (C=N1) 1541; υ (C=N2) 1490.1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 8.37, (s, 1H, CH=N 1 ); 8.26, (s, 1H, CH=N 4 ); 7.48-6.39 (m, 11H, aromatics ); 5.13 (s, 2H, O -CH 2 ); 3.71 (s, 3H, O -CH 3 ); 3.28, (t, 2H, J:0.015, S-CH 2 - ); 1.74 (m, 2H, -CH 2 - ); 1.01 (t, 3H, J:0.014, - CH 3 ).

2.4. Antioxidant property analysis

Different spectrophotometric assays were performed to evaluate the antioxidant properties of N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methyl/propyl-thiosemicarbazones and nickel(II) complexes. CUPRAC (cupric reducing antioxidant capacity) method [26, 27] was used for total antioxidant capacity determination. The CUPRAC method is based on the reduction of a Cu (II) -Nc complex to a yellow-orange colored Cu (I) -Nc solution in the presence of antioxidants and a measurement of absorbance at 450 nm. Results were reported as trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC). The free radical scavenging activities of synthesized compounds were determined by the DPPH method [28]. The DPPH activities were evaluated with respect to inhibition percentage of DPPH radical at 517 nm after reaction with a given samples. ABTS (2,2’- azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid))/persulfate method [29] was used to measure the antioxidant activity of synthesized compounds. This method is based on the inhibition of absorbance of the chromogenic radical cation of ABTS (ABTS . +) by antioxidants. Antioxidant activity was determined as a percentage inhibition of ABTS . + with respect to the decrease in the absorbance of the ABTS . + within a certain period of time in the presence of antioxidants. Hydroxyl radicals in the aqueous medium were produced through the Fenton system, and the hydroxyl radical scavenging (HRS) activities of the samples were determined using the modified CUPRAC method [30]. The initial concentration of each sample in the ABTS . + scavenging, DPPH scavenging and HRS activity determinations were used to be 10-3 M. In these tests, 0.5 mL were taken from the samples for all three methods. All antioxidant tests were carried out in triplicate.

2.5. X-ray crystallography

The crystals of 2 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution at room temperature. A light yellow crystal of 2, C18H22BrN3O2S, having approximate dimensions of 0.32 × 0.06 ×0.03 mm, was mounted on a glass fiber. All measurements were made on a Bruker APEX-II CCD imaging plate area detector with graphite monochromatic Mo-K αradiation (λ= 0.71073Å). Experimental conditions were summarized in Table 1. The crystal structure was solved and refined with SHELXTL [31]. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. H atoms were located in geometrically idealized positions C-H = 0.95(6) Å and treated as riding and U iso (H) = 1.2 U eq (C). The intra-intermolecular interactions were given in Table 2. Drawing was performed with the program ORTEP-III [32] with 50% probability displacement ellipsoid. ORTEP and unit cell packing diagram for 2 were given in Figures 2 and 3. The hydrogen-bond network was shown in Figure 4. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure in this paper has been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication number CCDC-2034512 for 2. Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: + 44 1223 336033. E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.

Table 1.

Crystal data and structure refinement for compound 2.

Parameters
CCDC deposition no. 2034512
Chemical formula C18H22BrN3O2S
Formula weight (g.mol-1) 424.35
Temperature (K) 296.15
Wavelength (Å) 0.71073
Crystal system monoclinic
Space group P21/c
Unit cell parameters
a, b, c (Å) 4.9253(12), 38.615(10), 10.353(3)
b (°) 100.907(18)
Volume (Å3) 1933.4(8)
Z 4
Dcalc (g.cm-3) 1.458
Absorption correction multi-scan
Tmin, Tmax 0.850, 0.937
F(000) 872.0
Crystal size (mm3) 0.327 x 0.060 x 0.029
Diffractometer/measurement method
Index ranges h,k,l -5<=h<=5, -42<=k<=45, -12<=l<=12
2θ Range for data collection (°) 6.330° < 2θ < 50.048°
Reflections collected 22042
Independent reflections 3416 [Rint = 0.1081, Rsigma = 0.0955]
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters 3416 / 21 / 239
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.014
Final R indexes [I>=2σ (I)] R1 = 0.0556, wR2 = 0.1236
R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1474, wR2 = 0.1592
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Intra-intermolecular interactions (Å, °).

D—H····A D—H H····A D····A D—H····A
C2-H2····O1 0.930 2.710 3.47(1) 139.9
C5-H5····C8 0.931 2.849 3.42(8) 120.6
C17-H17B····S1 0.970 2.628 3.57(1) 164.9
C16-H16A····Br1 0.971 2.912 3.79(7) 151.8
N1-H1C····Br1 0.890 2.634 3.33(5) 135.4
N1-H1A····Br1 0.890 2.673 3.35(5) 133.3
*O1-H1····N3 0.821 1.907 2.63(6) 147.0
Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

ORTEP diagram of compound 2 showing the labelling scheme of all atoms with 50% probability level.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A partial packing diagram of the compound 2 in unit cell.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Hydrogen-bond network.

3. Results

3.1. Some physical properties of the compounds

The colour of S-alkylthiosemicarbazones, obtained as crystalline powders, are light yellow. They are soluble in common organic solvents such as alcohols, chloroform, dichloromethane, dimethyl sulfoxide etc. The red colored nickel(II) complexes are stable in the air. For thiosemicarbazones and nickel(II) complexes, the methyl substitute derivatives have higher melting point than those with propyl substitution.

3.2. Spectral analysis

In the UV-Vis spectra of thiosemicarbazones the band observed at 240 nm is attributed to π→π* transition belonging to substitute benzene group. n→π* transitions associated with the imine group of thiosemicarbazone moiety are recorded at 294 and 305 nm [33, 34]. These bands were also detected at 240–244 nm and 294–306 nm in the spectra of the complexes. The metal→ligand charge transfer transitions were seen at 499–522 nm as weak absorption bands [22].

In the infrared spectra of thiosemicarbazones, the υ (OH) and υ (NH) bands were recorded at 3457, 3365 cm–1 and 3281, 3332 cm–1 for 1, 2 respectively. These bands were not present in the spectra of nickel(II) complexes because of the coordination of the phenolic oxygen and amidic nitrogen. The strong υ (C=N1) bands of compounds were observed at 1536–1602 cm–1 range [35]. In the spectra of complexes, new azomethine bands, υ (C=N4), were monitored at 1490–1590 cm–1 range due to the condensation of thioamide nitrogen and second aldehyde [36]. In addition, the aliphatic υ (CH) bands were observed at 2646–2935 cm–1 range [37].

When 1H-NMR spectra of thiosemicarbazones are examined, the proton of the phenolic hydroxyl group appeared as singlet at 11.53,11.31 ppm (for 1) and 11.76, 11.56 ppm (for 2) in different isomer ratios. The absence of these peaks in their complex spectra supports that the coordination is through phenolic oxygen [38]. In addition, the isomerism of the CH=N1 group, which was recorded as singlet in the range of 8.33–8.18 ppm in the spectra of thiosemicarbazones, was not observed in the spectra of the complexes due to hindered rotation around C=N1 and C=N4 double bond on complexation [39]. The peaks of the new CH=N4 group formed as a result of the template reaction were observed as singlets in the spectra of nickel(II) complexes in the range of 8.28–8.06 ppm [40]. Also, recording the peaks of methoxy substituted aldehyde at expected values supports its contribution in complex formation.

3.3. Crystallography

The single crystal of N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-propylthiosemicarbazone ( 2 ) were grown by slow evaporation of the ethanolic solution. The thiosemicarbazone crystallize in the monoclinic P21/c space group. The ortep diagram of the compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level is given in Figure 2. Crystal data and structure refinement details are given in Table 1. In addition, the networks showing unit cell and intermolecular/intramolecular hydrogen bonds are given in Figure 3 and Figure 4. The intra-intermolecular interactions are listed in Table 2 [41]. Accordingly, there are intramolecular hydrogen bond interaction between O1-H1∙∙∙∙∙∙N3 atoms with the distance of 1.907 Å. The structure includes a thiosemicarbazone cation with one counter bromide ion. The structure of the thiosemicarbazone contain hydrogen-bromide bonding interactions between bromide ions and the H1A and H1C atoms of ammonium group of the cationic moiety with the bond distances 2.634 and 2.673 Å for N1-H1C∙∙∙∙∙Br1 and N1-H1A∙∙∙∙∙Br1, respectively.

3.4. Antioxidant properties analysis

The CUPRAC method [26] was applied to N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methyl/propyl-thiosemicarbazones and nickel(II) complexes in comparison with the trolox standard reference compound. The linear equations (A = mC + n), correlation coefficients (r), and linear concentration ranges of tested compounds summarized in Table 3. The TEAC values of the ligands and complexes can be seen in Figure 5. Their trolox equivalent antioxidant capacities (TEAC coefficients) were calculated from the ratio of the slope of the calibration curve of each compounds to that of trolox.

Table 3.

The TEAC (trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity) coefficients of the compounds with respect to the CUPRAC assay.

Sample Working range Calibration equation Correlation coefficient (r) TEAC
1 6.1 × 10–6 – 3.0 × 10–5 A = 17034 c + 0.130 0.9918 1.02 ± 0.05
2 6.1 × 10–6 – 3.0 × 10–5 A = 18644 c + 0.119 0.9894 1.12 ± 0.01
1a 1.1 × 10–5 – 5.5 × 10–5 A = 11242 c + 0.165 0.9946 0.67 ± 0.03
1b 1.2 × 10–5 – 6.1 × 10–5 A = 5098 c + 0.052 0.9956 0.30 ± 0.04
1c 1.1 × 10–5 – 5.5 × 10–5 A = 9166 c + 0.046 0.9933 0.54 ± 0.01
2a 1.1 × 10–5 – 5.5 × 10–5 A = 6008 c + 0.017 0.9880 0.36 ± 0.04
2b 1.1 × 10–5 – 5.5 × 10–5 A = 9067 c - 0.007 0.9976 0.54 ± 0.06
2c 6.1 × 10–6 – 3.0 × 10–5 A = 7604 c - 0.019 0.9923 0.45 ± 0.02
Open in a new tab

Trolox εN: 1.67 x 104 L mol–1 cm–1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

TEAC values of the compounds..

The TEAC coefficients of the ligands were 1.02 and 1.12, as 1 and 2, respectively. The TEAC coefficients of the Ni(II) complexes with methyl derivatives were 0.67, 0.30 and 0.54, as 1a, 1b and 1c, respectively. The TEAC coefficients of the Ni(II) complexes with propyl derivatives were 0.36, 0.54 and 0.45, as 2a, 2b and 2c, respectively. When the synthesized compounds were compared with trolox as reference, the TEAC values of thiosemicarbazones (1 and 2) were higher than trolox (TEACtrolox=1.0). The nickel(II) complexes (1a-c and 2a-c) exhibited less antioxidant activity with lower TEAC coefficients. Also, when the TEAC values are examined, it is seen that the thiosemicarbazones are about twice as high as their antioxidant capacities compared to its nickel complexes. The position of the methoxy group in the benzene ring in nickel complexes affects the antioxidant capacity. When we examine the methyl derivatives of nickel(II) complexes, the high antioxidant capacity was obtained when the methoxy group was in 3th position, on the other hand, when we examined propyl derivatives, it was in the 4th position of the methoxy group.

Hydroxyl radicals were produced by reacting the iron-EDTA complex with H2O2. Hydroxyl radicals attack salicylate under acidic conditions, yielding a yellow product with Cu(II) -Nc. The added radical scavengers compete with salicylate for the produced hydroxyl radical and reduce chromophore formation from Cu(II)-Nc. HRS activity as inhibition ratio of the tested compounds was summarized in Table 4. When the HRS activities of the tested compounds were examined, it was found that there was no significant difference between the thiosemicarbazones and nickel complexes. On the other hand, the highest HRS activity belongs to 1 with 63.77% and the lowest belongs to 2b with 51.14%.

DPPH scavenging activities of the tested compounds also represent free radical scavenging activities. When Table 4 was examined, it can be seen that DPPH scavenging activities of propyl derivatives of Ni(II) complexes are higher than their methyl derivatives and free thiosemicarbazones. The highest DPPH scavenging activity belongs to 2c with 61.52%.

The ABTS radical scavenging activities of the tested compounds are summarized in Table 4 as percentage inhibition rate. ABTS radical scavenging activities of thiosemicarbazones were significantly higher compared to nickel(II) complexes. The results of ABTS radical scavenging activities of tested compounds were parallel with the antioxidant capacity results in view of ranking. Since ABTS radical scavenging activity also uses for total antioxidant capacity determination in the literature, it confirms the parallelism between CUPRAC results and ABTS radical scavenging activities obtained in the study. The highest ABTS scavenging activity belongs to 2 with 70.89% and the lowest belongs to 2a with 21.98%.

4. Conclusion

Six new nickel(II) template complexes with N2O2 chelating thiosemicarbazones were synthesized with appreciable yield of between 51%–72%. The structural characterizations of all compounds were carried out by using analytical and spectroscopic methods. The structure of N1-4-benzyloxysalicylidene-S-methylthiosemicarbazone (2) was confirmed by X-ray diffraction method. The compounds were investigated for the effect of alkyl chain and the position of the methoxy group of the second aldehyde on antioxidant activity. The thiosemicarbazones exhibited more potent antioxidant capacity than nickel(II) complexes. This is probably due to the fact that thiosemicarbazones have non-coordinated -NH2 and -OH groups, which allow the coordination of Cu(II) ion in CUPRAC method. With the formation of the complex, the thiosemicarbazones have coordinated with the nickel(II) ion via these groups. Thus, the antioxidant activity of the nickel(II) complexes is lower as expected. In the S-methyl derivative complexes, the high antioxidant capacity was obtained in the 1a where the methoxy group is in the 3th position. However, when S-propyl derivative complexes were examined for radical scavenging activity, highest activity was obtained in the 2b where the methoxy group is in the 4th position. In addition, it was observed that the radical scavenging activities of thiosemicarbazones were mostly higher than Ni(II) complexes, except DPPH activities. As can be seen, the synthesis of thiosemicemicarbazone derivatives and metal complexes with different substitutions plays an important role in obtaining the desired structure.

Acknowledgment and/or disclaimers, if any

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of İstanbul University, Turkey (Project Number: 22832).

References

  1. Weinert M Prostenik M Stanecev NZ Identification of normal, higher aliphatic aldehydeby means of the melting point data of the thiosemicarbazone. Croatica Chemica Acta . 1962;34:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Padhye S Kauffman GB Transition metal complexes of semicarbazones and thiosemicarbazones. Coordination Chemistry Reviews . 1985;63:127–160. [Google Scholar]
  3. Takjoo R Hashemzadeh A Rudbari HA Nicola F. Copper(II) and molybdenum(VI) complexes with 5-bromosalicylaldehyde S-allylisothiosemicarbazone: Syntheses, characterizations and crystal structures. Journal of Coordination Chemistry . 2013;66:343–357. [Google Scholar]
  4. Revenco MD Palamarciuc OV Bourosh PN Lipkowski J Gdaniec M New template reactions of salicylaldehyde S-methyl-isothiosemicarbazone with 2-formylpyridine promoted by Ni(II) or Cu(II) metal ions. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2011;368:157–164. [Google Scholar]
  5. Eğlence-Bakır S Şahin M Salt BZ Tüzün E Mataracı-Kara E Palladium (II) complexes with thione and thioalkylated thiosemicarbazones: Electrochemical, antimicrobial and thermogravimetric investigations. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2020;237:118358–118358. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Şahin M Eğlence-Bakır S Alpay M Alpay S Özmerdivenli R Effective copper (II) and nickel (II) complexes with N3O and ON3 thiosemicarbazidato ligands. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2020;502:119347–119347. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kalaivani P Prabhakaran R Kaveri MV Huang R Staples RJ Synthesis, spectral, X-ray crystallography, electrochemistry, DNA/protein binding and radical scavenging activity of new palladium(II) complexes containing triphenylarsine. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2013;405:415–426. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leovac VM Gerbeleu NV Canic VD Coordination compounds of cobalt (III), chromium (III), and vanadium (III) with salicylaldehyde S-methylthiosemicarbazone. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry . 1982;27:514–517. [Google Scholar]
  9. Meghdadi S Amirnasr M Majedi M Bagheri M Amiri A Template synthesis, and X-ray crystal structures of copper(II)and nickel(II) complexes of new unsymmetrical tetradentate Schiff base ligands. Electrochemistry, antibacterial properties, and metal ion effection hydrolysis–recondensation of the ligand. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2015;437:64–69. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bal-Demirci T Şahin M Kondakçı E Özyürek M Ülküseven B Synthesis and antioxidant activities of transition metal complexes based 3-hydroxysalicylaldehyde-S-methylthiosemicarbazone. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2015;138:866–872. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.10.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerbeleu V Revenco MD Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry . 1971;16:1046–1046. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bavin EM Rees RJW Robson JM Seiler M Seymour DE The tuberculostatic activity of some thiosemicarbazones. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology . 1950;2:764–772. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1950.tb12999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pelosi G Bisceglie F Bignami F Ronzi P Schiavone P Antiretroviral activity of thiosemicarbazone metal complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2010;53:8765–8769. doi: 10.1021/jm1007616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gou Y Wang J Chen S Zhang Z Zhang Y α-N-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazone Fe (III) complex: Characterization of its antitumor activity and identification of anticancer mechanism. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2016;123:354–364. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Qi J Yao Q Qian K Tian L Synthesis, antiproliferative activity and mechanism of gallium (III)-thiosemicarbazone complexes as potential anti-breast cancer agents. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2018;154:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar SM Dhahagani K Rajesh J Nehru K Annaraj J Synthesis, characterization, structural analysis and DNA binding studies of nickel(II)–triphenylphosphine complex of ONS donor ligand–Multisubstituted thiosemicarbazone as highly selective sensor for fluoride ion. Polyhedron . 2013;59:58–68. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tang L Zhou P Zhang Q Huang Z Zhao J A simple quinoline derivatized thiosemicarbazone as a colorimetic and fluorescent sensor for relay recognition of Cu2+ and sulfide in aqueous solution. Inorganic Chemistry Communications . 2013;36:100–104. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tian Y-P Yu W-T Zhao C Jiang M-H Cai Z-G Structural characterization and second-order nonlinear optical properties of zinc halide thiosemicarbazone complexes. Polyhedron . 2002;21:1217–1222. [Google Scholar]
  19. Youssef NS El-Seidy AMA Schiavoni M Castano B Ragaini F Thiosemicarbazone copper complexes as competent catalysts for olefin cyclopropanations. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry . 2012;714:94–103. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li MX Chen CL Ling CS Zhou J Ji BS Cytotoxicity and structure–activity relationships of four α-N-heterocyclic thiosemicarbazone derivatives crystal structure of 2-acetylpyrazine thiosemicarbazone. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters . 2009;19:2704–2706. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Şahin M Özdemir N Bal-Demirci T Ülküseven B Dinçer M Structural and spectroscopic characterization of a thiosemicarbazidatodioxouranium(VI) complex: A combined experimental and DFT study. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2015;135:994–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bal-Demirci T Şahin M Özyürek M Kondakçı E Ülküseven B. Synthesis antioxidant activities of the nickel(II), iron(III) and oxovanadium(IV) complexes with N2O2 chelating thiosemicarbazones. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2014;126:317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bal-Demirci T Şahin M Kondakçı E Özyürek M Ülküseven B Synthesis and antioxidant activities of transition metal complexes based 3-hydroxysalicylaldehyde-S-methylthiosemicarbazone. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2015;138:866–872. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.10.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. İlhan-Ceylan B. Oxovanadium IV) and Nickel(II) complexes obtained from 2,2′-dihydroxybenzophenone-S-methyl-thiosemicarbazone: Synthesis, characterization, electrochemistry, and antioxidant capability. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2020;517:120816–120816. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.120186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Eğlence S Şahin M Özyürek M Apak R Ülküseven B. Dioxomolybdenum(VI) complexes of S-methyl-5-bromosalicylidene-N-alkyl substituted thiosemicarbazones: Synthesis, catalase inhibition and antioxidant activities. Inorganica Chimica Acta . 2018;469:495–502. [Google Scholar]
  26. Apak R Güçlü K Özyürek M Karademir SE Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupric ion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method.  Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2004;52:7970–7981. doi: 10.1021/jf048741x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaya Y Erçağ A Koca A New square-planar nickel(II)-triphenylphosphine complexescontaining ONS donor ligands: Synthesis, characterization, electrochemical and antioxidant properties. Journal of Molecular Structure . 2020;1206:127653–127653. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sánchez‐Moreno C Larrauri JA Saura‐Calixto F A procedure to measure the antiradical efficiency of polyphenols. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture . 1998;76:270–276. [Google Scholar]
  29. Re R Pellegrini N Proteggente A Pannala A Yang M Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free radical biology and medicine . 1999;26:1231–1237. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00315-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Özyürek M Bektaşoğlu B Güçlü K Apak R Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay of phenolics and flavonoids with a modified cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method using catalase for hydrogen peroxide degradation. Analytica Chimica Acta . 2008;616:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bruker AXS WI 2000;6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Farrugia L. J. ORTEP -3 for Windows-a version of ORTEP-III with a graphical user interface (GUI) Journal of Applied Crystallography . 1997;30:565–565. [Google Scholar]
  33. Eğlence-Bakır S Saçan Ö Şahin M. Yanardağ R Ülküseven B. Dioxomolybdenum(VI) complexes with 3-methoxy salicylidene-N-alkyl substituted thiosemicarbazones. Synthesis, characterization, enzyme inhibition and antioxidant activity. Journal of Molecular Structure . 2019;1194:35–41. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kumar LV Nath GR Synthesis, characterization and biological studies of cobalt(II), nickel(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes of vanillin-4-methyl-4-phenyl-3-thiosemicarbazone. Journal of Chemical Sciences . 2019;131:76–76. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fetoh A Mohammaed MA Youssef MM El-rash GMA. Characterization, cyclic voltammetry and biological studies of divalent Co, Ni and Cu complexes of water-soluble, bioactive and photoactivethiosemicarbazone salt. Journal of Molecular Liquids . 2019;287:110958–110958. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jacob JM Prathapachandra-Kurup MR Nisha K Serdaroğlu G Kaya S. Mixed ligand copper(II) chelates derived from an O, N, S- donortridentate thiosemicarbazone: Synthesis, spectral aspects, FMO, and NBO analysis. Polyhedron . 2020;189:114736–114736. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bhowmick AC Bikash DN coordination complexes of transition metals and schiff base with potent medicinal activity. American Journal of Chemistry . 2019;9:109–114. [Google Scholar]
  38. Güveli Ş Nickel -PPh3 complexes of substituted benzophenone thiosemicarbazones: Electrochemistry, structural analysis, and antioxidant properties. Journal of Coordination Chemistry . 2020;73:137–153. [Google Scholar]
  39. Şahin M Koca A Özdemir N Dinçer M Büyükgüngör O Synthesis, X-ray crystal structures, thermal and electrochemical properties of thiosemicarbazidatodioxouranium(VI) complexes. Dalton Transactions . 2010;39:10228–10237. doi: 10.1039/c0dt00265h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Takjoo R Centore R Akbari A Ahmadi M. Square planar nickel(II) complexes derived from 5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde S-ethylisothiosemicarbazone: Preparation, characterization and structural studies. Polyhedron . 2014;80:243–249. [Google Scholar]
  41. Desiraju G. R. Steiner T. The Weak Hydrogen Bond: In Structural Chemistry and Biology . 2001;9 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Turkish Journal of Chemistry are provided here courtesy of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey

RESOURCES