Skip to main content
Journal of Wrist Surgery logoLink to Journal of Wrist Surgery
. 2021 Feb 9;10(4):286–289. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723795

Effectiveness and Safety of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injection Regarding Anatomical Landmarks: A Cadaveric Study

Hamid Namazi 1, Amir Ghane 1, Amir Reza Dehghanian 2, Mehran Fereidooni 3, Armin Akbarzadeh 1,
PMCID: PMC8328542  PMID: 34381630

Abstract

Background  Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injections can be applied using anatomical landmarks or under the guide of ultrasound (US). US is not always available, and the physician may rely on the anatomical landmarks.

Objective  The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TFCC injection with anatomic landmarks.

Methods  Forty wrist specimens from cadavers were randomly assigned to four rapid blue stain injection groups as follows: Group A: perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth; Group B: perpendicular to skin with 10 mm depth; Group C: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from proximal to distal with 10 mm depth; and Group D: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from distal to proximal with 10 mm depth. TFCC specimens were excised and evaluated with microscopy, and adjacent neurovascular structures were checked for any injury.

Results  Injections in group A were more accurate than others, in which 8/10 injections were successful. Group C injections were least accurate in that only 4/10 were successful. The other remaining groups (groups B and D) revealed similar results (5/10 were successful). However, statistical analyses did not show any significant difference ( p -value = 0.35). No injury to neurovascular structures was seen.

Conclusion  Needle placement perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth and just medial to ulnar styloid can be used as an accurate method of palpation-guided technique for TFCC injections.

Keywords: triangular fibrocartilage, injections, anatomic landmarks, cadaver


Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is an essential stabilizer of ulnocarpal and distal radioulnar joint in supination/pronation and axial load to the wrist. TFCC consists of various components, including articular disc, meniscus homologue, and ulnocarpal, dorsal, palmar radioulnar, ulnar collateral, ulnotriquetral, and ulnolunate ligaments. 1 Injuries to TFCC whether traumatic or degenerative may lead to pain and instability of the wrist. 2 3 The first-line management for TFCC injuries is conservative treatments, including rest, immobilization, analgesics, and physiotherapy. 4 If the patient does not respond to conservative treatment, invasive modalities such as corticosteroid injection or surgery are recommended. 5 Injection in TFCC similar to other regions in the musculoskeletal system can be applied using anatomical landmarks or ultrasound (US) guide. 6 7 Some believe that relying on anatomical landmarks is not a precise method due to lack of direct visualization of the structures. 8 However, in some outpatient clinics, US is not available, and the physician may rely on the anatomical landmarks. To our best knowledge, no precise descriptive technique based on anatomical landmarks and needle direction has been published. In the present cadaveric study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of TFCC injection with anatomic landmarks.

Materials and Methods

Forty wrist specimens from 20 fresh male cadavers, aged 20 to 70 years, without any noticeable scar or deformity in the wrist, were obtained. Since body mass index (BMI) could affect the depth of skin, we did not include grossly fat or lean cadavers. The procedures, including injection and dissection of the specimens, were performed by an orthopaedic surgery resident. The experiments were performed following Human Tissue Storage and Use Policy. The experiment was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Informed written consent was obtained from the first-degree relative of the deceased people.

Injection Technique

We positioned the forearms in pronation and identified the tip of ulnar styloid bone at the medial aspect of the wrist as the landmark for injection ( Fig. 1 ). We injected 0.1 cc of methylene blue with insulin syringe in each wrist specimen. The 40 specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups consisting of 10 wrist specimens as follows: Group A: perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth; Group B: perpendicular to skin with 10 mm depth; Group C: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from proximal to distal with 10 mm depth; and Group D: 45-degree angulation to skin surface, oriented from distal to proximal with 10 mm depth.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The tip of ulnar styloid bone identified as an anatomical landmark for methylene blue injection in triangular fibrocartilage complex.

Histopathologic Evaluation

After injection, the wrists were dissected, and TFCC specimens were excised and fixed in formalin. Also, adjacent neurovascular structures were checked for any injury during the injection. Cross-section samples of TFCC specimen were provided and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Color changes were observed under a microscope, and recorded with Olympus DP12 Digital Camera system (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). This observation was double-blinded and performed by a pathologist. Those specimens in which the blue color stained the TFCC complex were considered as a successful injection ( Fig. 2 ).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

High-power microscopy of the negative ( A ) and positive ( B ) staining of triangular fibrocartilage complex samples with methylene blue.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance between groups was analyzed by the chi-square test, using SPSS version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). A p -value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Forty wrist specimens from 20 cadavers underwent dissection after TFCC injection. The mean age of the recruited cadavers was 48.8 ± 12.9 years, ranging from 25 to 70 years ( Table 1 ). Sixteen (80%) cadavers were male, and the other four (20%) were female. In the gross exploration of the injection site, no injury to neurovascular structures was seen regardless of the method of injection. Injections in group A (perpendicular and 5 mm depth) were more accurate than others, in which 8/10 injections were successful. The group C (45-degree angulation proximal to distal and 10 mm depth) injections were least accurate in that only 4/10 were successful. The other remaining groups (groups B and D) revealed similar results (5/10 were successful). Despite variation in the success rate of injections in different groups, statistical analyses did not show any significant difference ( p  = 0.35).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and positive triangular fibrocartilage complex staining following dye injection.

Variable Mean (SD) p -Value
Age 48.8 (12.9)
Sex ( n  = 20) n (%)
 Male 16 (80)
 Female 4 (20)
Positive TFCC staining ( n = 40)
 Group A, n  = 10  8 (80)  0.35
 Group B, n  = 10  5 (50)
 Group C, n  = 10  4 (40)
 Group D, n  = 10  5 (50)

Abbreviations: TFCC, triangular fibrocartilage complex; SD, standard deviation.

Note: Group A, perpendicular and 5 mm depth; Group B, perpendicular and 10 mm depth; Group C, 45-degree angulation proximal to distal and 10 mm depth; Group D, 45-degree angulation distal to proximal and 10 mm depth.

Discussion

Steroid injection can be used as a nonoperative method in the treatment of TFCC injuries. Despite the superficial lying of ulnocarpal joint, precise needle placement and injection into TFCC can be challenging due to small space, variable anatomy, and injection method. Initially, some studies used fluoroscopy to increase the accuracy of injections. Nevertheless, fluoroscopy is expensive, requires cumbersome equipment, and also exposes the patient and physician to ionizing radiation. 9 On the contrary, recently, US has been used as a popular and precise utility and without the risk of radiation for guided intra-articular injections. 10 However, US is expensive and also needs expert physician. Therefore, intra-articular injections are often performed without US guidance. Familiarization with the ulnocarpal anatomical landmarks is an essential requirement for proper and effective injection. Incorrect injection not only can lead to ineffective treatment but also may cause inadvertent complications. 11 However, previous studies on palpation-guided intra-articular injections have revealed that the accuracy rate was low compared with radiographic or sonographic-guided methods. 12 Contrarily, our results showed 80% accuracy rate. The best explanation is that the previously reported studies had no formal and precise palpation technique, and correct placement of the needle. Nam et al 8 evaluated palpation- versus US-guided techniques in wrist injections. They showed that sonography-guided injections are more accurate than palpation-guided technique. Majority of previous studies suggests US-guided injections due to its higher accuracy. 13 14 15 16 However, some studies revealed that despite the greater accuracy rate of sonographic-guided injections versus palpation-guided method, there are no 17 18 19 or modest 20 21 differences in their clinical outcomes. To our best knowledge, no formal and precise description for a palpation-guided technique for TFCC injections has been published. Our study presents the first published cadaveric description of a palpation-guided technique for TFCC injection. Our results suggest that the best technique for effective TFCC injection is to place the needle perpendicular to the skin, just medial to ulnar styloid with 5 mm depth. There are some limitations in this study. First, the number of cases was relatively small. Second, we did not evaluate the cadavers for possible needle barriers such as osteophytes or ulnar styloid nonunions. Third, all the injections were performed in medium-sized cadavers. Fourth, this work was done on cadavers, so the results may not exactly be representative of the clinical outcome. We selected the cadavers from same sex and with same BMI and excluded the cadavers in extremes of age (older than 70 and younger than 17 years) to make our specimens more similar. Also, we excluded those wrist specimens with gross pathology or scar at their upper extremities. However, minor variations may still be preset among the specimens and it was inevitable. The strong point of this study is that this is the first study that evaluated different methods of palpation for TFCC injection.

Conclusion

Needle placement perpendicular to skin with 5 mm depth and just medial to ulnar styloid can be used as an accurate method of palpation-guided technique for TFCC injections.

Acknowledgment

The present article was extracted from the thesis written by Amir Ghane, MD. This project has been accomplished in collaboration with Bone and Joint Research Center.

Funding Statement

Funding The project was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None declared.

References

  • 1.Casadei K, Kiel J.Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) Injuries. StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available at:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537055/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brogan D M, Berger R A, Kakar S. Ulnar-sided wrist pain: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2019;7(05):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Skalski M R, White E A, Patel D B. The traumatized TFCC: an illustrated review of the anatomy and injury patterns of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45(01):39–50. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jawed A, Ansari M T, Gupta V. TFCC injuries: how we treat? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(04):570–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waryasz G R, Tambone R, Borenstein T R, Gil J A, DaSilva M. Review of anatomical placement of corticosteroid injections for uncommon hand, wrist, and elbow pathologies. R I Med J (2013) 2017;100(02):31–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boesen M, Jensen K E, Torp-Pedersen S, Cimmino M A, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bliddal H. Intra-articular distribution pattern after ultrasound-guided injections in wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(02):331–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu W-T, Chang K-V, Mezian K. Ulnar wrist pain revisited: ultrasound diagnosis and guided injection for triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1540. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nam S H, Kim J, Lee J H, Ahn J, Kim Y J, Park Y. Palpation versus ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and short-term effect in the distal radioulnar joint disorder: a randomized, prospective single-blinded study. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(12):1807–1814. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2355-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith J, Hurdle M-F, Locketz A J, Wisniewski S J. Ultrasound-guided piriformis injection: technique description and verification. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1664–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colio S W, Smith J, Pourcho A M. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures of the wrist and hand: anatomy, indications, and techniques. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016;27(03):589–605. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berkoff D J, Miller L E, Block J E. Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:89–95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S29265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ruiz A, Bravo D, Duarte A, Adler R, Raya J. Ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection has higher accuracy than landmark-guided intraarticular injection in rat knee joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020;28:S303–S304. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Koutsianas C, Klocke R. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided injections in rheumatology: a systematic review. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2016;27(04):179–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu T, Song H X, Dong Y, Li J H. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial–subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45(03):374–378. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoeber S, Aly A-R, Ashworth N, Rajasekaran S. Ultrasound-guided hip joint injections are more accurate than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(07):392–396. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aly A-R, Rajasekaran S, Ashworth N. Ultrasound-guided shoulder girdle injections are more accurate and more effective than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(16):1042–1049. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gilliland C A, Salazar L D, Borchers J R. Ultrasound versus anatomic guidance for intra-articular and periarticular injection: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39(03):121–131. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.09.1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(07):1862–1869. doi: 10.1002/art.27448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berona K, Abdi A, Menchine M. Success of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided arthrocentesis of hip, ankle, and wrist in a cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(02):240–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bookman J S, Pereira D S. Ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee and shoulder injections: a review. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2014;72(04):266–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sage W, Pickup L, Smith T O, Denton E R, Toms A P. The clinical and functional outcomes of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for adults with shoulder pathology--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52(04):743–751. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Wrist Surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES