Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72357-0, published online 24 September 2020
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Abstract.
“The VRN-based 3D CNN outperformed orthopedists specialized in shoulder and general orthopedists in binary accuracy (92.5% vs. 76.4% and 68.2%), top-1 accuracy (69.0% vs. 45.8% and 30.5%), top-1±1 accuracy (87.5% vs. 79.8% and 71.0%), sensitivity (0.94 vs. 0.86 and 0.90), and specificity (0.90 vs. 0.58 and 0.29).”
now reads:
“The VRN-based 3D CNN outperformed orthopedists specialized in shoulder and general orthopedists in binary accuracy (92.5% vs. 76.4% and 68.2%), top-1 accuracy (69.0% vs. 45.8% and 30.5%), top-1±1 accuracy (87.5% vs. 79.8% and 71.0%), sensitivity (0.92 vs. 0.89 and 0.93), and specificity (0.86 vs. 0.61 and 0.26).”
The original Article has been corrected.
Contributor Information
Youngjun Kim, Email: junekim@kist.re.kr.
Seok Won Chung, Email: smilecsw@gmail.com.