Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2021 Jul 20;11:658070. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.658070

Acquisition of a Stable and Transferable bla NDM-5-Positive Plasmid With Low Fitness Cost Leading to Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance in KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae During Treatment

Jiangqing Huang 1, Shengcen Zhang 1, Zhichang Zhao 2, Min Chen 3, Yingping Cao 1,*, Bin Li 1,*
PMCID: PMC8329419  PMID: 34354959

Abstract

The emergence and prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have drawn worldwide attention. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) gives us a valuable alternative strategy to treat CRE infections. Unfortunately, CAZ/AVI resistance could occur during CAZ/AVI treatment. The CAZ/AVI-resistant Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) (KP137060) and earlier CAZ/AVI-susceptible isolate (KP135194) from the same hospitalized patient were collected at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between October and November 2019. In this study, CAZ/AVI MICs of CAZ/AVI-susceptible and -resistant isolates (KP135194 and KP137060) were 4 mg/L and 128 mg/L, respectively; and the two isolates had the same antibiotic resistance pattern to other carbapenems. Two strains were then submitted for whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. ompK36 was not detected in two isolates. No mutation was observed in bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37 in this study and there was no significant difference of the expression in bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37 between the two isolates (p>0.05). Two isolates were sequence type 11 and harbored bla KPC-2, bla SHV-182 and bla TEM-1B. Compared with KP135194, KP137060 harbored an additional bla NDM-5 positive plasmid. bla NDM-5 gene could be successfully transferred into E. coli J53 at a conjugation frequency of 1.14×10-4. Plasmid stability testing showed that bla KPC-2- and bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids were still stably maintained in the hosts. Growth assay and growth competition experiments showed there was no significant difference in fitness cost between two CR-KP isolates. Our study described the acquisition of a bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid leading to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae during treatment. This phenomenon deserves further exploration.

Keywords: ceftazidime/avibactam, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, whole-genome sequencing, fitness cost, NDM

Introduction

The emergence and prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have attracted extensive attention (Potter et al., 2016). Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) is the most common CRE worldwide (Grundmann et al., 2017; Han et al., 2020). CR-KP can lead to many kinds of infections, such as pneumonia, bloodstream infections and urinary tract infections, resulting in high morbidity and mortality (Huang et al., 2018). CR-KP is an extremely severe public health challenge nowadays (Zheng et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2019). Patients with CR-KP infections had few effective treatment options, including polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides and fosfomycin (Zhang et al., 2019). However, these antibiotics are limited by efficacy and safety (Satlin et al., 2011).

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is a valuable alternative strategy to treat KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections (Tumbarello et al., 2019). CAZ/AVI is a novel combination of ceftazidime and the β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam with activity against class A, class C and some class D carbapenemases, including the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) (Zasowski et al., 2015; Shirley, 2018). Furthermore, CAZ/AVI has no activity against class B carbapenemases, such as New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) (Thaden et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). NDM from Klebsiella pneumoniae was first found in 2009 (Kumarasamy et al., 2010). Up to now, a total of 31 variants (NDM-1 to NDM-31) have been detected globally and the sequences were deposited in NCBI [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/refgene/#gene_family: (blaNDM)]. Among these variants, NDM-5 was first identified in an Escherichia coli strain in the UK in 2011 and has drawn worldwide attention due to its rapid dissemination (Hornsey et al., 2011). Furthermore, NDM-5-producing strains have been usually identified from humans, animals and hospital environments’ sewage water (Hornsey et al., 2011; Yousfi et al., 2015; Parvez and Khan, 2018). Worryingly, NDM-5 has been identified in various species of Enterobacterales across many cities in China (Mao et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2019). Like other variants of NDM, NDM-5 can lead to CAZ/AVI resistance (Wei et al., 2020).

Many studies found that CAZ/AVI resistance could occur during CAZ/AVI treatment, such as mutations in bla KPC, the increased copy number of the variation of bla KPC (bla KPC-3) and overexpression of bla KPC (Shields et al., 2017; Hemarajata and Humphries, 2019; Räisänen et al., 2019; Coppi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). However, there has been no report of a case of acquiring metallo-β-Lactamase genes during CAZ/AVI treatment. In this study, we reported the emergence of CAZ/AVI-resistance due to acquisition of a metallo-β-lactamase gene during treatment of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections and identify and validate the reason for CAZ/AVI-resistance emergence using genomic and molecular genetic approaches.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolates and Case Report

The CAZ/AVI-resistant CR-KP (KP137060) and earlier CAZ/AVI-susceptible isolate (KP135194) from the same hospitalized patient were collected at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between October and November 2019. The bacterial species were identified using Vitek-2 (GN cards).

Following a traffic accident, a 67-year-old man was admitted to our ICU with pulmonary infections. Treatment with tigecycline (50 mg every 12 h) and polymyxin B (0.5 miu every 12 h) was initiated after obtaining postbronchoscopic sputum cultures, which yielded CR-KP. However, postbronchoscopic sputum cultures were still positive for CR-KP (KP135194) after 16 days of treatment, susceptible to CAZ/AVI and resistant to carbapenems. Eight CR-KPs have been isolated before KP135194 and they had the same MICs in CAZ/AVI, MEM, ETP and IMP (4µg/ml, ≥16µg/ml, ≥16µg/ml and ≥8µg/ml, respectively). Then the patient was switched to CAZ/AVI treatment. The treatment with CAZ/AVI in monotherapy (2.5 g every 8 h) was administered for 11 days. However, postbronchoscopic sputum cultures were positive for CR-KP (KP137060) again after seven days end of the CAZ/AVI treatment, resistant to both CAZ/AVI and carbapenems. No other CR-KP was isolated between KP135194 and KP137060. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia had been recovered in postbronchoscopic sputum cultures on hospital day 19, day 21, day 37 and day 42. The patient was subsequently discharged and turned to another hospital. Microbiologic details, timelines and antibiotic therapies used were summarized in Figure 1 .

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Time courses of infection and treatment of the patient with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Vitek-2 (Vitek-AST-GN16 and Vitek-AST-GN09) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2020). CAZ powder was kindly provided by Pfizer (China) and AVI powder was purchased from GlpBio (Montclair, CA, USA). CAZ/AVI susceptibility testing was performed by agar dilution method. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4µg/ml, in combination with 2-fold dilutions of ceftazidime. MICs were interpreted according to CLSI susceptible breakpoint of ≤ 8/4 μg/ml (CLSI, 2020). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as quality control.

Detection of Carbapenemase Genes and Clonal Relatedness

The presence of carbapenemase genes (bla KPC, bla NDM, bla VIM and bla IMP) was identified by PCR as described previously (Li et al., 2014). The complete sequence of bla KPC was determined by Sanger sequencing and subsequently submitted to BLAST program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) against the bla KPC reference sequence (GenBank accession number: NG_049253.1). The primers of carbapenemase genes are listed in Table S1 .

Clonal relatedness of two CR-KPs was analyzed by ERIC-PCR as described previously (Smith et al., 2007).

Expression Analysis of bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37

Overnight cultures of two CR-KP strains were grown till the logarithmic growth phase in LB broth medium and cells were harvested at an optical density of 1 at 600 nm (OD600). Total RNA was extracted from the two isolates using Trizol reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The expression levels of RNA coding for bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37 were estimated by qRT-PCR using SYBR Green detection reagents (Tiangen, Beijing) on ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system. The Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔCT formula with the rpsL gene as the internal control (Haeili et al., 2017). All samples were performed in triplicate. rpsL, bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37 were amplified using primers listed in Table S1 .

Conjugation Experiments and Plasmid Stability Testing

Conjugation experiments were performed to test the transferability of bla KPC-2 and bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids using filter mating (Shintani et al., 2019). E. coli J53 AzR was used as the recipient. The mating mixture was washed from the filter and spread onto MH agar containing sodium azide at 100 mg/liter and imipenem at 1 mg/liter. The grown isolates were selected and identified by PCR (Li et al., 2014). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the recipient and transconjugant was performed as described above. The conjugation frequency (CF) was calculated as follow (Shintani et al., 2019):

CF=Number transconjugants (CFU/mL)Numbers of donor and recipient cells (CFU/mL)

Plasmid stability testing was conducted to evaluate the stability of bla KPC-2 and bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids as described previously (Johnson et al., 2016).

Fitness Cost Assessment

Growth assay and in vitro growth competition experiments were tested to assess the fitness cost of KP135194 and KP137060. Growth assay was performed as described previously (Fernández et al., 2012). In vitro competition experiments were performed as described previously (Li et al., 2017).

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Analysis

The genomic DNA samples were extracted from the CAZ/AVI-susceptible and –resistant isolates by TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing), sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The raw data were assembled using SPAdesv3.12.0. The genetic relationship of the two strains was determined by average nucleotide identity (ANI) and core genome SNPs analysis (Richter et al., 2016). The Center for Genomic Epidemiology (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/) was used to identify resistance genes, major outer membrane porin genes (ompK35, ompK36 and ompK37) and plasmid types. The multilocus-sequence typing was identified on MLST. VFDB (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/main.htm) was used to predict the virulence genes. The K-type prediction was carried out by Kaptive (http://kaptive.holtlab.net).

For plasmids, the putative extrachromosomal contigs combining the identification with the genes encoding plasmid replication, partition, conjugative transfer or resistance, were recognized as potential plasmid contigs (Botelho et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018). The bla KPC-2 and bla NDM-5 were identified on those plasmid-associated contigs in assembled genomes, determining in silico the bla KPC-2 (or bla NDM-5) location on plasmids. The putative plasmid contigs were analyzed and re-assembled to build single circular plasmids by mapping reference complete plasmid genome. Additional sets of PCRs were performed to confirm the circular status of predicted plasmids as reported previously (Carattoli et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018). Genes were predicted with GeneMarkS™ and further annotated by BLASTP and BLASTN against NR databases and SwissProt. The BLASTN program was used to compare similar plasmids in the international databases.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (two-tailed) or Mann-Whitney test was performed for data comparison. Only p < 0.05 was set as the significance level.

Results

Clonal Relatedness, Antibiotic Resistances and Carbapenemase Genes

ERIC-PCR analysis demonstrated that two CR-KP isolates were clonally related ( Figure S1 ). KP137060 had higher MICs of CAZ/AVI (5-doubling dilution difference) and TGC (1-doubling dilution difference) than KP135194. They had the same MICs in MEM, ETP and IMP. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the two CR-KPs were shown in Table 1 . bla KPC-2 was found in both isolates, and bla NDM-5 was also detected in KP137060.

Table 1.

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of two CR-KP isolates, the bla NDM-5-positive E. coli transconjugant and E. coli J53 recipient strains.

Antibiotics (MICs (mg/L)/antimicrobial susceptibility) Isolates
KP135194 KP137060 Transconjugant (bla NDM-5) E. coli J53
Ampicillin ≥32/R ≥32/R ≥32/R 8/S
Ampicillin/sulbactam ≥32/R ≥32/R ≥32/R 4/S
Piperacillin ≥128/R ≥128/R ≥128/R ≤4/S
Piperacillin/tazobactam ≥128/R ≥128/R ≥128/R ≤4/S
Aztreonam ≥64/R ≥64/R ≤1/S ≤1/S
Cefazolin ≥64/R ≥64/R ≥64/R ≤4/S
Cefuroxime ≥64/R ≥64/R ≥64/R 4/S
Ceftriaxone ≥64/R ≥64/R ≥64/R ≤1/S
Ceftazidime ≥64/R ≥64/R ≥64/R ≤1/S
Imipenem ≥16/R ≥16/R ≥16/R ≤1/S
Meropenem ≥16/R ≥16/R ≥16/R ≤0.25/S
Ertapenem ≥8/R ≥8/R ≥8/R ≤0.5/S
Ceftazidime/avibactam 4/S 128/R 128/R 0.125/S
Ciprofloxacin ≥4/R ≥4/R ≤0.25/S ≤0.25/S
Levofloxacin ≥8/R ≥8/R ≤0.25/S ≤0.25/S
Gentamicin ≥16/R ≥16/R ≤1/S ≤1/S
Amikacin ≥64/R ≥64/R ≤2/S ≤2/S
Tobramycin ≥16/R ≥16/R ≤1/S ≤1/S
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole ≥320/R ≥320/R ≤20/S ≤20/S
Colistin ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
Tigecycline 2/S 4/I ≤0.5/S ≤0.5/S

Mutation and Expression Analysis of blaKPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37

The results of PCR amplification and sequencing of bla KPC-2 suggested that no mutation was found in bla KPC-2 in two CR-KP isolates ( Table 2 ). We did not detect mutations in ompK35 and ompK37 using ResFinder, respectively. ompK36 was not present in two isolates in this study ( Table 2 ). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the expression of bla KPC-2, ompK35 and ompK37 between the two isolates (p=0.2209, p=0.4217 and p=0.8626, respectively) ( Figure S2 ).

Table 2.

Genetic characteristics and source of two CR-KP isolates.

Isolate
KP135194 KP137060
Source postbronchoscopic sputum postbronchoscopic sputum
MLST ST11 ST11
β-lactamase resistance genes blaKPC-2, blaSHV-182, blaTEM-1B, blaLAP-2 blaKPC-2, blaNDM-5, blaSHV-182, blaTEM-1B, blaLAP-2
blaKPC-2 variant No mutation No mutation
ompK35 No mutation No mutation
ompK36 -*
ompK37 No mutation No mutation
Other resistance genes rmtB, fosA, catA2, qnrS1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14 rmtB, fosA, catA2, qnrS1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14
Plasmid profile ColRNAI, IncFII(pHN7A8), IncHI1B, IncR ColRNAI, IncFII(pHN7A8), IncHI1B, IncR, IncX3
blaKPC-2 gene location IncFII/IncR plasmid
(size:146878 bp)
IncFII/IncR plasmid
(size:146878 bp)
blaNDM-5 gene location IncX3 plasmid
(size:46161 bp)
Hvkp associated genes (K1, K2, rmpA/rmpA2)

*Not detected.

Conjugation Experiments, Plasmid Stability Testing and Fitness Cost Assessment

In this study, the bla NDM-5 gene was transferred successfully into E. coli J53 at a conjugation frequency of 1.14×10-4, but bla KPC-2 failed. The presence of bla KPC-2 and bla NDM-5 was confirmed by PCR. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing among recipient cell and transconjugant were shown in Table 1 . Plasmid stability testing showed that bla KPC-2- and bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids were still stably maintained in the CR-KP during 150 generations ( Figure S3 ).

As shown in Figure S4 , no significant difference (p>0.05) in growth was observed in two CR-KP isolates. The result of in vitro growth competition experiments showed that the relative fitness cost was 1.01.

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Analysis

General genome features of the sequenced genomes of two strains were shown in Table S2 . Genetic analysis demonstrated that the two CR-KP isolates were sequence type (ST) 11 and harbored beta-lactamase genes. The whole-genome analysis revealed that KP135194 and KP137060 were highly homologous, showing 99.99% ANI values between them. The result of core genome SNPs analysis showed that the number of nonsynonymous SNPs in the core genome was 23 between the two strains. In this study, KP137060 harbored an additional bla NDM-5. Other resistance genes were detected in both isolates, which were shown in Table 2 , including rmtB, fosA, catA2, qnrS1, sul2, tet (A) and dfrA14. Virulence genes (rmpA and rmpA2) and capsule types (K1 and K2) genes associated with hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) were not found ( Table 2 ).

Compared with the KP135194, KP137060 had an additional plasmid (IncX3) ( Table 2 ). Additionally, the results of whole-genome sequencing suggested that bla KPC-2 (IncFII/IncR) and bla NDM-5 (IncX3) located in two different plasmids, respectively. The complete nucleotide sequences of bla KPC-2- and bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids and sizes of plasmids were shown in Figure 2 . Table S3 showed the results of bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid and its sequences producing significant alignments using the BLAST tool.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic maps of the bla KPC-2-harboring plasmid (A) and the bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid (B). Genes are denoted by arrows and colored based on gene function classification. The innermost circle represents GC-Skew [G-C)/G+C]. The black circle represents GC content. The pKPC-CR-hvKP-C789 plasmid was used to reconstruct bla KPC-2-harboring plasmid as reference plasmid (accession number: CP034417.1). The pCREC-591_4 plasmid was used to reconstruct bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid as reference plasmid (accession number: CP024825.1).

For the genetic environment of the bla KPC-2 gene, upstream of the bla KPC-2 gene was located in a Tn1331 element. Furthermore, a putative ISKpn6-like element was located downstream of the bla KPC-2 gene, followed by the korC gene (a gene encoding transcriptional repressor protein), a gene encoding hypothetical proteins and the klcA gene. For bla NDM-5, upstream of the bla NDM-5 was located a putative IS26 element, a gene encoding twin-arginine translocation (TAT) pathway signal sequence domain protein, a gene encoding hypothetical proteins and a trpF gene (a gene encoding phosphorybosilanthranilate isomerase gene), were inserted between them. In addition, an IS5 element was located downstream of bla NDM-5.

Discussion

CAZ/AVI has been considered a promising treatment strategy for CRKP infections after approval by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 (van Duin and Bonomo, 2016). Unfortunately, many reports found CAZ/AVI resistance could occur during CAZ/AVI treatment (Shields et al., 2017; Räisänen et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020). According to the rapid risk assessment published by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) in 2018, the emergence of CAZ-AVI resistance is an important cross-border threat that should be monitored carefully (Räisänen et al., 2019). Here, in this study, we reported the acquisition of a metallo-β-lactamase gene leading to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae during treatment.

CAZ/AVI resistance has been linked to the specific mutations in bla KPC, bla CTX-M and outer membrane protein genes, the increased copy number of the variation of bla KPC (bla KPC-3), overexpression of bla KPC and outer membrane protein genes and acquisition of MBL genes (Galani et al., 2019; Hemarajata and Humphries, 2019; Coppi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). In this study, a MBL gene, bla NDM-5, was detected in KP137060. Our results indicated that the acquisition of bla NDM-5 during CAZ/AVI treatment was the possible reason of its resistance to CAZ/AVI. Meanwhile, KP137060 had higher MICs of CAZ/AVI (5-doubling dilution difference) than KP135194 ( Table 1 ), which was supported by the fact that CAZ/AVI has no activity against class B carbapenemases (Mueller et al., 2019). In addition, recent study found that the MBL-producing CR-KP isolates, including VIM-producing and VIM/KPC-co-producing isolates, increased after the introduction of CAZ/AVI treatment in an ICU ward (Papadimitriou-Olivgeris et al., 2019). Therefore, our study provided evidence to the fact that widespread CAZ/AVI use might lead to a change in carbapenemases palettes with the substitution of MBL-producing CR-KP isolates for KPC (Papadimitriou-Olivgeris et al., 2019).

In this study, bla KPC-2 and bla NDM-5 located in two different plasmids, respectively ( Figure 2 ). Our results indicated that bla NDM-5 was contained on IncX3-type plasmid in KP137060. IncX3 plasmids were usually detected in clinical blaNDM-5-positive bacteria in China (Cao et al., 2020; Gao et al., 2020). The results of BLAST demonstrated that the bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid showed >99% sequence identity to the corresponding regions of other plasmids identified in other countries and isolated from different hosts ( Table S3 ), suggesting that this type of plasmid was widespread dissemination worldwide. Meanwhile, many studies have characterized the genetic environments of the bla NDM-5 and various mobile genetic elements played a critical role in the rapid spread of bla NDM-5 (Pitart et al., 2015; Reynolds et al., 2019). In this study, we described the genetic environment of bla NDM-5 ( Figure 2 ). It is noteworth that such a genetic environment was found in different plasmids in China, probably indicating that they have a common origin (Liu et al., 2019; Cao et al., 2020). Additionally, the genetic environment of bla NDM-5 was similar to those in previously reported clinical K. pneumoniae isolates in India and Spain (Krishnaraju et al., 2015; Pitart et al., 2015). The results of this study suggested that the genetic environment of bla NDM-5 could contribute to the widespread of CAZ/AVI-resistant CR-KPs.

In addition, our study demonstrated that the bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid was transferrable and stable. Given the high transferability and stability of bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid in clinical CR-KP, the spread of bla NDM-5-harboring plasmids into other K. pneumoniae had the potential to cause refractory infections due to limited therapeutic options. Futhermore, there were no significant fitness cost compared with KP135194 in this study ( Figure S4 ), indicating that no considerable fitness costs were identified in carriage of the plasmid containing bla NDM-5 could be accepted as an important advantage of CAZ/AVI-resistant CR-KP clonal propagation, increasing the risk of dissemination.

In the present case, the patient was treated with 11 days of CAZ/AVI (2.5 g; administered intravenously every 8 h) treatment. After that, CAZ/AVI-resistant CR-KP was identified and clonally related to earlier CAZ/AVI-susceptible CR-KP. Risk factors associated with acquired CR-KP colonization included previous exposure to tigecycline or β-lactam/β-lactamases inhibitor, ICU stays and invasive processes or surgical operations (Qin et al., 2020). In current study, the patient stayed in ICU for up to 30 days and received tigecycline treatment before CAZ/AVI treatment. CR-KP was not isolated when the patient was admitted to the hospital. Additionally, CR-KP was most common among CRE in our hospital (He et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019). Based on the above-mention facts, we speculated the patient might get CR-KP colonization during his stay at ICU and acquisition of a bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid in KP137096 was caused mainly by the selective pressure of CAZ/AVI usage.

There were some limitations to our study. First, the CRE-screening tests were not carried out to exclude the presence of the NDM-5 producer as colonizer using specimens from sputum or/and rectal swabs. Meanwhile, because the determination was not performed to detect the carbapenem genes in clinical CRE strains in our hospital, we could not know the origin of bla NDM-5. Second, the CAZ/AVI-resistant CR-KP strain was isolated after CAZ/AVI treatment. Therefore, we could not exclude the probability that KPC-2-producing K.pneumonia has harbored the bla NDM-5 from different bacteria that carried it through HGT during the patient’s hospitalization, rather than the CAZ-AVI treatment. Third, we only used additional PCR sets to confirm the circular status of predicted plasmids in this study. The results of plasmid contents should be more reliable if the S1-PFGE coupled with hybridization could be used in this study.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the acquisition of a bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid leading to resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae during treatment. Meanwhile, the bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid was transferrable and the conjugation frequency was 1.14×10-4. Furthermore, no considerable fitness costs were identified in the carriage of the plasmid containing bla NDM-5. Therefore, careful monitoring of resistance development by bacterial cultures and subsequent susceptibility testing is significant. Continued surveillance is required to avoid CAZ/AVI-resistance CR-KP dissemination.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The complete genome sequence of CR-KP strains KP135194 and KP137060 were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers JABJTP000000000 and JABJWR000000000 under BioProject PRJNA633438. The complete sequences of bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid and bla KPC-2-harboring plasmid were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers MW218142 and MW218143, respectively.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (No.2020KY088). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

JH and SZ performed experiments. JH and ZZ designed the study and drafted the manuscript. SZ analyzed the data. YC and MC supervised the study. BL revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Joint Funds for the innovation of science and Technology, Fujian province (Grant number: 2017Y9049, 2017Y9051) and the Educational and Scientific Research Project for Young and Middle-Aged Teachers of Fujian Province (Grant number: JAT190191).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2021.658070/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Botelho J., Grosso F., Quinteira S., Mabrouk A., Peixe L. (2017). The Complete Nucleotide Sequence of an IncP-2 Megaplasmid Unveils a Mosaic Architecture Comprising a Putative Novel bla VIM - 2-Harbouring Transposon in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa . J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72 (8), 2225–2229.   10.1093/jac/dkx143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao T., Liu Y., Li Y., Wang Y., Shen Z., Shao B., et al. (2020). A Public Health Concern: Emergence of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in a Public Transportation Environment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75 (10), 2769–2772.   10.1093/jac/dkaa260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carattoli A., Carretto E., Brovarone F., Sarti M., Villa L. (2018). Comparative Analysis of an Mcr-4 Salmonella Enterica Subsp. Enterica Monophasic Variant of Human and Animal Origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73 (12), 3332–3335.   10.1093/jac/dky340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLSI (2020). M100-S28. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 30th Informational Supplement (Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; ). [Google Scholar]
  5. Coppi M., Di Pilato V., Monaco F., Giani T., Conaldi P. G., Rossolini G. M. (2020). Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Associated With Increased bla KPC - 3 Gene Copy Number Mediated by Pkpqil Plasmid Derivatives in Sequence Type 258 Klebsiella Pneumoniae . Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64 (4), e01816–e01819.   10.1128/aac.01816-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernández A., Pérez A., Ayala J. A., Mallo S., Rumbo-Feal S., Tomás M., et al. (2012). Expression of OXA-Type and SFO-1 β-Lactamases Induces Changes in Peptidoglycan Composition and Affects Bacterial Fitness. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56 (4), 1877–1884.   10.1128/aac.05402-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galani I., Antoniadou A., Karaiskos I., Kontopoulou K., Giamarellou H., Souli M. (2019). Genomic Characterization of a KPC-23-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae ST258 Clinical Isolate Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25 (6), 763.e765–763.e768.   10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao Y., Wen J., Wang S., Xu X., Zhan Z., Chen Z., et al. (2020). Plasmid-Encoded bla NDM - 5 Gene That Confers High-Level Carbapenem Resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium of Pork Origin. Infect. Drug Resist. 13, 1485–1490.   10.2147/idr.S249357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grundmann H., Glasner C., Albiger B., Aanensen D. M., Tomlinson C. T., Andrasević A. T., et al. (2017). Occurrence of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae and Escherichia Coli in the European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): A Prospective, Multinational Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17 (2), 153–163.   10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30257-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo X., Rao Y., Guo L., Xu H., Lv T., Yu X., et al. (2019). Detection and Genomic Characterization of a Morganella Morganii Isolate From China That Produces NDM-5. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1156.   10.3389/fmicb.2019.01156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haeili M., Javani A., Moradi J., Jafari Z., Feizabadi M. M., Babaei E. (2017). MgrB Alterations Mediate Colistin Resistance in Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates From Iran. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2470.   10.3389/fmicb.2017.02470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han R., Shi Q., Wu S., Yin D., Peng M., Dong D., et al. (2020). Dissemination of Carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Adult and Children Patients in China. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 10, 314.   10.3389/fcimb.2020.00314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He Q., Chen W., Huang L., Lin Q., Zhang J., Liu R., et al. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Three Automated Identification Systems in Detecting Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae . Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 15 (1), 40.   10.1186/s12941-016-0154-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hemarajata P., Humphries R. M. (2019). Ceftazidime/avibactam Resistance Associated With L169P Mutation in the Omega Loop of KPC-2. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74 (5), 1241–1243.   10.1093/jac/dkz026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hornsey M., Phee L., Wareham D. W. (2011). A Novel Variant, NDM-5, of the New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase in a Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia Coli ST648 Isolate Recovered From a Patient in the United Kingdom. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55 (12), 5952–5954.   10.1128/aac.05108-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang W., Qiao F., Zhang Y., Huang J., Deng Y., Li J., et al. (2018). In-Hospital Medical Costs of Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae . Clin. Infect. Dis. 67 (suppl_2), S225–s230.   10.1093/cid/ciy642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson T. J., Danzeisen J. L., Youmans B., Case K., Llop K., Munoz-Aguayo J., et al. (2016). Separate F-Type Plasmids Have Shaped the Evolution of the H30 Subclone of Escherichia Coli Sequence Type 131. mSphere 1 (4), e00121–e00116.   10.1128/mSphere.00121-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jung H. J., Littmann E. R., Seok R., Leiner I. M., Taur Y., Peled J., et al. (2019). Genome-Wide Screening for Enteric Colonization Factors in Carbapenem-Resistant ST258 Klebsiella Pneumoniae . mBio 10 (2), e02663–e02618.   10.1128/mBio.02663-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krishnaraju M., Kamatchi C., Jha A. K., Devasena N., Vennila R., Sumathi G., et al. (2015). Complete Sequencing of an IncX3 Plasmid Carrying bla NDM - 5 Allele Reveals an Early Stage in the Dissemination of the bla NDM Gene. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 33 (1), 30–38.   10.4103/0255-0857.148373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumarasamy K. K., Toleman M. A., Walsh T. R., Bagaria J., Butt F., Balakrishnan R., et al. (2010). Emergence of a New Antibiotic Resistance Mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: A Molecular, Biological, and Epidemiological Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 10 (9), 597–602.   10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70143-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li C., Li Y., Zhao Z., Liu Q., Li B. (2019). Treatment Options and Clinical Outcomes for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infection in a Chinese University Hospital. J. Infect. Public Health 12 (1), 26–31.   10.1016/j.jiph.2018.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu Z., Xiao X., Li Y., Liu Y., Li R., Wang Z. (2019). Emergence of IncX3 Plasmid-Harboring bla NDM - 5 Dominated by Escherichia Coli ST48 in a Goose Farm in Jiangsu, China. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2002.   10.3389/fmicb.2019.02002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li B., Xu X. H., Zhao Z. C., Wang M. H., Cao Y. P. (2014). High Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase Among Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in a Teaching Hospital in China. Can. J. Microbiol. 60 (10), 691–695.   10.1139/cjm-2014-0291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li S., Yin Y., Chen H., Wang Q., Wang X., Wang H. (2017). Fitness Cost of Daptomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Obtained From In Vitro Daptomycin Selection Pressure. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2199.   10.3389/fmicb.2017.02199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mao J., Liu W., Wang W., Sun J., Lei S., Feng Y. (2018). Antibiotic Exposure Elicits the Emergence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia Coli Coharboring MCR-1 and NDM-5 in a Patient. Virulence 9 (1), 1001–1007.   10.1080/21505594.2018.1486140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mueller L., Masseron A., Prod’Hom G., Galperine T., Greub G., Poirel L., et al. (2019). Phenotypic, Biochemical and Genetic Analysis of KPC-41, a KPC-3 Variant Conferring Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Exhibiting Reduced Carbapenemase Activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63 (12), e01111–e01119.   10.1128/aac.01111-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M., Bartzavali C., Lambropoulou A., Solomou A., Tsiata E., Anastassiou E. D., et al. (2019). Reversal of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae Epidemiology From bla KPC - to bla VIM -Harbouring Isolates in a Greek ICU After Introduction of Ceftazidime/Avibactam. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74 (7), 2051–2054.   10.1093/jac/dkz125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parvez S., Khan A. U. (2018). Hospital Sewage Water: A Reservoir for Variants of New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase (NDM)- and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Enterobacteriaceae . Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 51 (1), 82–88.   10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pitart C., Solé M., Roca I., Román A., Moreno A., Vila J., et al. (2015). Molecular Characterization of bla NDM - 5 Carried on an IncFII Plasmid in an Escherichia Coli Isolate From a Nontraveler Patient in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59 (1), 659–662.   10.1128/aac.04040-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Potter R. F., D’Souza A. W., Dantas G. (2016). The Rapid Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae . Drug Resist. Update 29, 30–46.   10.1016/j.drup.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Qin X., Wu S., Hao M., Zhu J., Ding B., Yang Y., et al. (2020). The Colonization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae: Epidemiology, Resistance Mechanisms, and Risk Factors in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units in China. J. Infect. Dis. 221 (Suppl 2), S206–s214.   10.1093/infdis/jiz622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Räisänen K., Koivula I., Ilmavirta H., Puranen S., Kallonen T., Lyytikäinen O., et al. (2019). Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae During Treatment, Finland, December 2018. Euro Surveill 24 (19), 1900256.   10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2019.24.19.1900256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reynolds M. E., Phan H. T. T., George S., Hubbard A. T. M., Stoesser N., Maciuca I. E., et al. (2019). Occurrence and Characterization of Escherichia Coli ST410 Co-Harbouring bla NDM - 5, bla CMY - 42 and bla TEM - 190 in a Dog From the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74 (5), 1207–1211.   10.1093/jac/dkz017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Richter M., Rosselló-Móra R., Oliver Glöckner F., Peplies J. (2016). JSpeciesWS: A Web Server for Prokaryotic Species Circumscription Based on Pairwise Genome Comparison. Bioinformatics 32 (6), 929–931.   10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Satlin M. J., Kubin C. J., Blumenthal J. S., Cohen A. B., Furuya E. Y., Wilson S. J., et al. (2011). Comparative Effectiveness of Aminoglycosides, Polymyxin B, and Tigecycline for Clearance of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae From Urine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55 (12), 5893–5899.   10.1128/aac.00387-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shields R. K., Chen L., Cheng S., Chavda K. D., Press E. G., Snyder A., et al. (2017). Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Due to Plasmid-Borne bla KPC - 3 Mutations During Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61 (3), e02097–e02016.   10.1128/aac.02097-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shintani M., Ohkuma M., Kimbara K. (2019). High-Resolution Comparison of Bacterial Conjugation Frequencies. J. Vis. Exp. 143, e57812.   10.3791/57812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shirley M. (2018). Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Review in the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections. Drugs 78 (6), 675–692.   10.1007/s40265-018-0902-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith J. L., Drum D. J., Dai Y., Kim J. M., Sanchez S., Maurer J. J., et al. (2007). Impact of Antimicrobial Usage on Antimicrobial Resistance in Commensal Escherichia Coli Strains Colonizing Broiler Chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 (5), 1404–1414.   10.1128/aem.01193-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun L., Xu J., He F. (2018). Draft Genome Sequence of an NDM-5, CTX-M-15 and OXA-1 Co-Producing Escherichia Coli ST167 Clinical Strain Isolated From a Urine Sample. J. Glob Antimicrob. Resist. 14, 284–286.   10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thaden J. T., Pogue J. M., Kaye K. S. (2017). Role of Newer and Re-Emerging Older Agents in the Treatment of Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae . Virulence 8 (4), 403–416.   10.1080/21505594.2016.1207834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tumbarello M., Trecarichi E. M., Corona A., De Rosa F. G., Bassetti M., Mussini C., et al. (2019). Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Salvage Therapy in Patients With Infections Caused by Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. Pneumoniae . Clin. Infect. Dis. 68 (3), 355–364.   10.1093/cid/ciy492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. van Duin D., Bonomo R. A. (2016). Ceftazidime/avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: Second-Generation β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 63 (2), 234–241.   10.1093/cid/ciw243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wei J., Zou C., Wang D., Huang A., Niu S. (2020). Genetic Diversity and In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Aztreonam/Avibactam Against Imipenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates in Southwest China: A Single-Centre Study. J. Glob Antimicrob. Resist. 22, 448–451.   10.1016/j.jgar.2020.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu Z., Xie J., Yang L., Chen D., Peters B. M., Shirtliff M. E. (2018). Complete Sequence of pCY-CTX, a Plasmid Carrying a Phage-Like Region and an ISEcp1-Mediated Tn2 Element From Enterobacter Cloacae . Microb. Drug Resist. 24 (3), 307–313.   10.1089/mdr.2017.0146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yousfi M., Mairi A., Bakour S., Touati A., Hassissen L., Hadjadj L., et al. (2015). First Report of NDM-5-Producing Escherichia Coli ST1284 Isolated From Dog in Bejaia, Algeria. New Microbes New Infect. 8, 17–18.   10.1016/j.nmni.2015.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zasowski E. J., Rybak J. M., Rybak M. J. (2015). The β-Lactams Strike Back: Ceftazidime-Avibactam. Pharmacotherapy 35 (8), 755–770.   10.1002/phar.1622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang P., Shi Q., Hu H., Hong B., Wu X., Du X., et al. (2020). Emergence of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26 (1), 124.e121–124.e124.   10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang J., Yu L., Fu Y., Zhao Y., Wang Y., Zhao J., et al. (2019). Tigecycline in Combination With Other Antibiotics Against Clinical Isolates of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae In Vitro . Ann. Palliat Med. 8 (5), 622–631.   10.21037/apm.2019.09.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zheng X., Wang J. F., Xu W. L., Xu J., Hu J. (2017). Clinical and Molecular Characteristics, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 6, 102.   10.1186/s13756-017-0256-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The complete genome sequence of CR-KP strains KP135194 and KP137060 were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers JABJTP000000000 and JABJWR000000000 under BioProject PRJNA633438. The complete sequences of bla NDM-5-harboring plasmid and bla KPC-2-harboring plasmid were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers MW218142 and MW218143, respectively.


Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES