Skip to main content
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry logoLink to Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
. 2021 Jul 20;69(8):535–541. doi: 10.1369/00221554211033239

Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies

Francesco Mascadri 1,*, Roberta Ciccimarra 2,*, Maddalena M Bolognesi 3, Fabio Stellari 4, Francesca Ravanetti 5,*, Giorgio Cattoretti 6,*,
PMCID: PMC8329438  PMID: 34282664

Abstract

Immunodetection on mouse routinely processed tissue via antibodies raised in mice faces cross-reactivity of the secondary anti-mouse reagents with endogenous immunoglobulins, which permeate the tissue. Various solutions to this problem have been devised and include endogenous Ig block with anti-mouse Fab fragments or directly conjugated primary antibodies. Mouse isotype-specific antibodies, differently from reagents directed against both heavy and light chains, fail to detect endogenous Ig after fixation and embedding, while providing a clean and specific detection system for mouse antibodies on mouse routinely processed tissue.

Keywords: antibodies, immunoglobulin isotypes, immunohistochemistry, indicators and reagents, mice

Introduction

The research on routinely processed tissue (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded: FFPE) via immunostaining has exploded after the introduction of antigen retrieval and the availability of reproducible primary antibodies (Abs), nowadays in monoclonal or recombinant form, raised in rabbits, mice, rat, etc. The detection of unconjugated primary Abs by anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) secondary Abs has provided a cheap, versatile, and robust method which is at the basis of histopathology immunodiagnostics and research. But this is only true for human FFPE tissue, where the secondary anti-mouse reagents are preadsorbed so that they do not detect endogenous human Ig.

When applying primary Abs raised in mice to FFPE mouse tissue, inevitably secondary Abs do detect endogenous Ig, in plasma cells, B cell, intestinal epithelial cells, serum, interstitial space, and in every instance where endogenous Ig are present.13 This makes it impossible to use a simple primary–secondary sequence when both the source of the primary Ab and the tissue are from the same host.

To overcome this limitation, various experimental and commercial solutions have been proposed.

The simplest is to use directly conjugated primary mouse Ig, typically in fluorescence, a solution which applies best to frozen mouse tissue because the antigens are lightly fixed, a broad selection of Abs and conjugates is available, and the sensitivity is superior to FFPE tissue. Haptenated mouse primary Abs coupled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary Abs for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining may be a solution, which has not been explored thoroughly.

A solution which has been commercially made available is to somehow shield the endogenous Ig in the tissue from the detection by the secondary anti-mouse Ig, leaving only the primary Ab applied to the tissue to be detected. The application of Fab monomers of anti-mouse anti-heavy and anti-light chain Abs (H+L) before the application of the primary Ab would fit that purpose.

Alternatively, conjugated Fab fragments of anti-mouse Abs are complexed with the unconjugated primary Ab before applying to the tissue, in a sort of ad hoc conjugation of the Ab with a reporter-carrying secondary Ab.2,3

Because of these problems, most of the IHC staining on mouse tissue relies on the ever-expanding catalog of rabbit monoclonal Abs or Abs raised in goats, hamsters, rats etc., where the secondary reagents are absorbed with mouse Ig, preventing any cross-reactivity.

While experimenting with staining with mouse primary Abs on FFPE mouse tissue,4 we found a simple, straightforward solution which applies to any immunostaining, fluorescent, or in IHC, using mouse Abs on FFPE mouse tissue: anti-isotype secondary Abs.

Materials and Methods

Mouse and rat tissues were leftovers of approved experiments. Three common mouse strains were analyzed: C57Bl/6N, BalbC, and FVB/N. Rat Sprague Dawley strain was used. All animal experiments from which tissue was obtained were approved by the intramural animal welfare committee for animal experimentation of Chiesi Farmaceutici under protocol number: 449/2016-PR and comply with the European Directive 2010/63 UE, Italian D.Lgs 26/2014, and the revised “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and National Research Council, 2010).

Five-µm sections from FFPE tissue on silanized slides were dewaxed and antigen retrieved as published.5 No blocking step was performed.6 Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated.7

Primary Abs used are listed in Table 1. Incubation with appropriately diluted mouse serum or Ab dilution buffer only did not show any difference in staining (not shown). Primary Ab or control Ig incubation time was 1 hr. The anti-mouse Ig Abs or the HRP-conjugated polymers were incubated for 30 min each, all at room temperature.

Table 1.

Primary and Secondary Antibodies.

Target Clone Species Working Conc./Dilution Cat. No. Company Lot RRID:AB_
Primary antibodies
 Nil N/A All isotypes (mouse serum Ig) 2 µg/ml 011-000-002 JIR 125643 2337187
 CTNNB1 #14 Mouse IgG1 1 µg/ml 610154 Becton Dickinson (BD) Pharmingen 88001 397555
 Ki-67 8D5 Mouse IgG1 1 µg/ml SAB5300425 Merck-Sigma 1012212 10979995
 Ki-67 UMAB107 Mouse IgG2a 1 µg/ml UM800033 Origene UM800033 2629145
 TCF1/7 C5 Mouse IgG2a 1 µg/ml sc-271453 SCBT J1717 10649799
Host Target Format Specificity Cat. No. Working Conc./Dilution Company Notes Lot RRID:AB_
Secondary antibodies
 Gt IgG1 Biotin AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 1 specific 115-065-205 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 100878 2338571
 Gt IgG2a Biotin AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific 115-065-206 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 104859 2338572
 Gt IgG2a ATTO 488 Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific 610-152-041 2 µg/ml Rockland Whole IgG 31155 2614855
 Gt IgG2a CF488A Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific SAB4600239 2 µg/ml Sigma Whole IgG 11C1003 NA
 Gt IgG2b Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2b specific 115-545-207 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 133657 2338856
 Gt IgG2b Alexa Fluor 680 Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2b specific A31564 2 µg/ml Invitrogen Whole IgG 923450 1500893
 Gt IgG3 Alexa Fluor 647 AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 3 specific 115-605-209 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 144446 2338920
 Gt IgG1 Unconjugated AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG1, Fcγ fragment specific 115-007-185 2 µg/ml JIR Fab 126091 2632498
 Gt IgG2a Unconjugated AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG2a, Fcγ fragment specific 115-007-186 2 µg/ml JIR Fab 126677 2632499
 Gt IgG2b Unconjugated AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG2b, Fcγ fragment specific 115-007-187 2 µg/ml JIR Fab 126866 2632500
 Gt IgG H+L Unconjugated Affinity Purified Fab fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Antibody 810-1102 2 µg/ml Rockland Fab 29892 218897
 Rb IgG H+L Unconjugated AffiPure Rabbit anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) 315-005-045 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 113040 2340038
 Rb Mo Fcγ Unconjugated AffiniPure Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ fragment specific 315-005-046 2 µg/ml JIR Whole IgG 125565 2340039
 Horse Mo H+L HRP ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Mouse IgG PLUS Polymer Kit, Peroxidase MP-7802 N/A Vector Labs ZG0618 2336535
 Horse Rb H+L HRP ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Rabbit IgG PLUS Polymer Kit, Peroxidase MP-7801 N/A Vector Labs ZF0724 2336536
 Horse Goat H+L HRP ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Goat IgG Polymer Kit, Peroxidase MP-7405 N/A Vector Labs ZG0923 2336526

Note that the secondary antibodies have been absorbed with immunoglobulins from multiple mammals (human, rabbit, mouse, rat, etc.) to avoid cross-reactivity. For individual antibody absorption, consult the commercial source. Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulins; JIR, Jackson Immuno Research; SCBT, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Gt, goat; Rb, rabbit; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; Mo, mouse.

Polymers carrying human serum-absorbed horse anti-mouse (H+L) Ig, conjugated to HRP (Table 1), were used as suggested by the manufacturer. Whole or Fab fragments of anti-mouse H+L Ig chains or anti-isotype, raised in goat and rabbit (Table 1), were counterstained with anti-goat/sheep or anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated polymers (Table 1).

The IHC stains were developed in diaminobenzidine (K3468; Agilent Technologies Italia S.p.A., Cernusco sul Naviglio, Italy), lightly counterstained in hematoxylin, mounted, and scanned on an S60 Hamamatsu scanner (Nikon; Campi Bisenzio, Italy).

Results

Polymers carrying HRP and anti-mouse H+L Ig chains raised in horse (Table 1) applied to mouse routinely processed tissue do detect endogenous Ig, diffusely in the interstitium, in plasma cells, and in gut epithelia (Fig. 1) (Table 2). Unconjugated anti-mouse H+L Abs (Table 1), whole molecules or Fab fragments, counterstained with an HRP–Ig polymer directed at the species in which they are raised (goat, rabbit) (Table 1) also detect endogenous Ig (Fig. 1) (Table 2). The anti-goat or anti-rabbit HRP–Ig polymers (Table 1), absorbed against mouse Ig, provide a clean background (Table 2) (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Immunostaining of C57Bl/6N mouse FFPE tissue (spleen, intestine, and lymph node) for (A) horse anti-mouse H+L polymer; (B) goat anti H+L mouse Ig, unconjugated; (C) rabbit anti H+L mouse Ig, unconjugated; (D) rabbit anti-mouse IgG heavy chains, unconjugated; (E) goat anti-mouse IgG1, biotin; (F) goat anti-mouse IgG2a, biotin; (G) goat anti-mouse IgG2b, Alexa488; (H) goat anti-mouse IgG3, Alexa647. (E–F) Extranodal mast cells (star) capture the staining sequence. Note the absence of plasma cell staining in the villi in D. B and E–H are counterstained with a Horse anti-Goat/Sheep HRP-conjugated polymer. C and D are counterstained with a horse anti-rabbit polymer. Developed in DAB. Scale bar = 100 µm. Abbreviations: FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; Ig, immunoglobulins; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; DAB, diaminobenzidine.

Table 2.

Staining of Endogenous Mouse Ig by Anti-Mouse Antibodies.

Host Specificity Format Reagent Second Layer Results
First layer
 N/A N/A N/A Nil Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 N/A N/A N/A Nil Horse anti-Mouse-HRP Positive staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 1 Biotin Goat a Mouse IgG1—biotin Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2a Biotin Goat a Mouse IgG2a—biotin Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2a ATTO 488 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2a CF488A Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2b Alexa Fluor 488 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2b Alexa Fluor 680 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b Horse anti-Goat-HRP PC staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 3 Alexa Fluor 647 Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 3 Horse anti-Goat-HRP Negative staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 1 Unconjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 1 Horse anti-Goat-HRP PC staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2a Unconjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a Horse anti-Goat-HRP PC staining
 Gt Fcγ subclass 2b Unconjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b Horse anti-Goat-HRP PC staining
 Gt IgG H+L Unconjugated Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Horse anti-Goat-HRP Positive staining
 Rb IgG H+L Unconjugated Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Horse anti-Rabbit-HRP Positive staining
 Rb Mo Fcγ Unconjugated Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ fragment Horse anti-Rabbit-HRP Positive staining

Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulins; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; Gt, goat; PC = plasma cells; Rb, rabbit; Mo, mouse.

Fluorochrome-conjugated Abs specific for mouse heavy chain isotypes IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3, however, fail to detect endogenous mouse Ig (Fig. 1) while providing a clean detection of exogenous mouse Abs on mouse tissue (Fig. 2) (Table 2). Reagents from four different providers (Table 1) reacted identically (Table 2). Fab monomers of anti-isotype Igs detected plasma cells in lymph node medullary cords, but not or minimally interstitial Igs (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Immunostaining of C57Bl/6N mouse formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (spleen, intestine) with anti-isotype secondary antibodies. (A) CTNNB1 (mouse IgG1 clone #14) staining of small intestine; note the membranous staining on the enterocytes and the nuclear staining in the crypt base. Scale bar: 100 µm. Inset: a low-power view of the same specimen. Secondary Ab: (Gt a Mo IgG1-biot.). (B) TCF1/7 (mouse IgG2a clone C5) nuclear staining of T cells in the spleen. Scale bar = 100 µm. Inset: Ki-67 staining (mouse IgG2a clone UMAB107) of small intestine. Scale bar = 100 µm. Secondary Ab: (Gt a Mo IgG2a, Fab). Abbreviations: Ab, antibody; Gt, goat; Mo, mouse.

To control for the difference between anti-isotypic and antiallotypic reactivity with endogenous Ig heavy chains, a rabbit Ab for the FC, but not the light-chain-containing Fab portion of mouse IgG, was applied and counterstained with a mouse-adsorbed, anti-rabbit HRP polymer, resulting in detection of endogenous Ig, except in gut IgA plasma cells (Fig. 1) (Table 2).

Anti-isotype staining of tissue from a total of three mouse strains produced identical staining (Supplemental Fig. 3).

Anti-mouse isotype Abs, which are not absorbed against rat Ig, do cross-react with rat Ig in suspension because of sequence similarities between the Ig of two closely related species; we tested whether anti-mouse isotypes would react with FFPE rat tissue and they do not (not shown).

Anti-mouse H+L Fab fragment block at 10 or 100 µg/ml did not prevent unwanted endogenous Ig staining (Supplemental Fig. 4).

Discussion

A very simple, cheap, and very efficient solution to the problem of cross-reactivity with endogenous Ig, when using mouse on mouse staining, is the use of anti-isotype secondary Abs on FFPE tissue sections. Not only the diffuse Ig-containing serum is not detected but also the dense Ig deposits within the plasma cell cytoplasm are negative.

Although limited in the variety of anti-isotype Ab suppliers and in examples of mouse tissue stainings, we believe that these findings, if confirmed by others, will broaden the use of mouse Abs on mouse FFPE experimental tissue.

Several factors, alone or in synergy, may produce this result.

Signal Dilution

The detection of only one of the two types of Ig chains may theoretically halve the reactivity when using anti-isotypes. In addition, while the light chains are common to all isotypes, the detection of isotypes further reduces the amount of detection, to the extent to which that isotype is represented among all the serum Ig. This may amount to a factor from a third to a fourth, depending on the mouse strain,8,9 to be added to the halving previously mentioned. In organs where IgA are the predominant species, both in epithelia and plasma cells, avoiding detecting the light chains is a big factor. The failure to detect the cytoplasm of IgG plasma cells in indirect IHC, however (see below), suggests that additional factors may be involved.

Conformational Epitopes

The epitope composing the isotype specificity of murine Ig may be conformational in nature10 and may be destroyed by the FFPE processing. The Fc receptor, to name one, undergoes a similar inactivation upon tissue processing6 and several other conformational epitopes as well. However, the secondary Abs are polyclonal; thus, some Ig clones reacting with the denatured epitope may exist. In IgG-containing spleen sections, robust signal amplification is required to detect those minute amounts of FFPE-proof Abs.11 It is useful to remember to this point that the efforts to raise polyclonal Abs against denatured human antigens for FFPE use failed repeatedly at the beginning of the IHC era and this may be the case for anti-isotypes.

Curiously, polyclonal Abs against both the heavy and light Ig chains, which by definition is a complex conformation of four separate proteins, two by two identical, are unfortunately very efficient at detecting denatured endogenous Ig on FFPE mouse tissue.

Preabsorption

All the reagents used have been preabsorbed against the other mouse isotypes (and human Igs). This procedure may have removed from the polyclonal Ab pool the Ig species directed against the epitopes, FFPE processing dependent or surviving, which are shared among diverse isotypes. The ones left over detect a conformational epitope(s) on the native Ig, which is destroyed upon fixation and embedding, resulting in the selective detection of the exogenous Ig applied to the section. As a confirmation of the hypothesis, an Ab raised against the mouse IgG heavy chains, not absorbed to other mouse Ig, does detect endogenous Ig in FFPE material.

Ab Format and Staining Conditions

Fluorochrome- or biotin-conjugated Abs failed to detect endogenous mouse Ig in plasma cells and in the interstitium, while Fab monomers labeled plasma cells only. Several factors may have to be taken into account for this differential reactivity. Fluorochrome or biotin conjugation adds up to the Ig molecular weight and steric hindrance, creating a bulkier product. If we add to this a short incubation time, 30 min, tailored to mimic the usual staining conditions for secondary Abs, but shortening the time to penetrate into the FFPE tissue, the combination may produce the peculiar differential reactivity we have described. To this “physical” effect, one may add the proprietary immunization protocol and affinity purification columns of the producers, which may subtly play in the recognition of soluble circulating Igs versus hypoglycosylated intracellular Ig in plasma cells, recognizing the target in an unconventional environment such as the FFPE material.

No matter what causes this very distinct unreactivity of anti-mouse Ig isotypes for FFPE mouse Ig, this effect is exploitable to expand the use of mouse Abs on mouse tissue.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 – Supplemental material for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining by Francesco Mascadri, Roberta Ciccimarra, Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Fabio Stellari, Francesca Ravanetti and Giorgio Cattoretti in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Acknowledgments

We thank the laboratory technicians and animal husbandry teams who helped in this work.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Contributions: GC and FR equally designed the experiments. MMB devised the image analysis algorithms and performed visual and digital image analysis. FM and RC performed immunostaining experiments. FS provided mouse samples. GC, FR, and FS wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work has been supported by the Departmental University of Milano-Bicocca funds, by Regione Lombardia POR FESR 2014-2020, Call HUB Ricerca ed Innovazione: ImmunHUB to GC. MMB is a PhD student in the DIMET PhD Program call XXXV of the Department of Medicine and Surgery of the University of Milano-Bicocca since November 2019.

Contributor Information

Francesco Mascadri, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Roberta Ciccimarra, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy

Fabio Stellari, Corporate Pre-Clinical R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy.

Francesca Ravanetti, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Giorgio Cattoretti, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Literature Cited

  • 1. Lu QL, Partridge TA. A new blocking method for application of murine monoclonal antibody to mouse tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998;46(8):977–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Brown JK, Pemberton AD, Wright SH, Miller HRP. Primary antibody-Fab fragment complexes: a flexible alternative to traditional direct and indirect immunolabeling techniques. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52(9):1219–30. doi: 10.1369/jhc.3A6200.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Goodpaster T, Randolph-Habecker J. A flexible mouse-on-mouse immunohistochemical staining technique adaptable to biotin-free reagents, immunofluorescence, and multiple antibody staining. J Histochem Cytochem. 2014;62:197–204. doi: 10.1369/0022155413511620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cattoretti G, Fei Q. Application of the antigen retrieval technique in experimental pathology: from human to mouse. In: Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor C, editors. Antigen retrieval techniques: immunohistochemistry and molecular morphology. Bradford: Eaton Pub Co; 2000;165-79. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Scalia CR, Boi G, Bolognesi MM, Riva L, Manzoni M, DeSmedt L, Bosisio FM, Ronchi S, Leone BE, Cattoretti G. Antigen masking during fixation and embedding, dissected. J Histochem Cytochem. 2017;65(1):5–20. doi: 10.1369/0022155416673995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Buchwalow I, Samoilova V, Boecker W, Tiemann M. Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts. Sci Rep. 2011;1:28. doi: 10.1038/srep00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li C, Ziesmer S, Lazcano-Villareal O. Use of azide and hydrogen peroxide as an inhibitor for endogenous peroxidase in the immunoperoxidase method. J Histochem Cytochem. 1987;35(12):1457–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bos NA, Kimura H, Meeuwsen CG, De Visser H, Hazenberg MP, Wostmann BS, Pleasants JR, Benner R, Marcus DM. Serum immunoglobulin levels and naturally occurring antibodies against carbohydrate antigens in germ-free BALB/c mice fed chemically defined ultrafiltered diet. Eur J Immunol. 1989;19(12):2335–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830191223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Klein-Schneegans AS, Kuntz L, Fonteneau P, Loor F. Serum concentrations of IgM, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG3 and IgA in C57BL/6 mice and their congenics at the lpr (lymphoproliferation) locus. J Autoimmun. 1989;2(6):869–75. doi: 10.1016/0896-8411(89)90013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hamilton RG, Morrison SL. Epitope mapping of human immunoglobulin-specific murine monoclonal antibodies with domain-switched, deleted and point-mutated chimeric antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1993;158(1):107–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90263-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Casola S, Cattoretti G, Uyttersprot N, Koralov SB, Seagal J, Hao Z, Waisman A, Egert A, Ghitza D, Rajewsky K. Tracking germinal center B cells expressing germ-line immunoglobulin gamma1 transcripts by conditional gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(19):7396–401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602353103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 – Supplemental material for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining by Francesco Mascadri, Roberta Ciccimarra, Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Fabio Stellari, Francesca Ravanetti and Giorgio Cattoretti in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry


Articles from Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry are provided here courtesy of The Histochemical Society

RESOURCES