Abstract
Immunodetection on mouse routinely processed tissue via antibodies raised in mice faces cross-reactivity of the secondary anti-mouse reagents with endogenous immunoglobulins, which permeate the tissue. Various solutions to this problem have been devised and include endogenous Ig block with anti-mouse Fab fragments or directly conjugated primary antibodies. Mouse isotype-specific antibodies, differently from reagents directed against both heavy and light chains, fail to detect endogenous Ig after fixation and embedding, while providing a clean and specific detection system for mouse antibodies on mouse routinely processed tissue.
Keywords: antibodies, immunoglobulin isotypes, immunohistochemistry, indicators and reagents, mice
Introduction
The research on routinely processed tissue (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded: FFPE) via immunostaining has exploded after the introduction of antigen retrieval and the availability of reproducible primary antibodies (Abs), nowadays in monoclonal or recombinant form, raised in rabbits, mice, rat, etc. The detection of unconjugated primary Abs by anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) secondary Abs has provided a cheap, versatile, and robust method which is at the basis of histopathology immunodiagnostics and research. But this is only true for human FFPE tissue, where the secondary anti-mouse reagents are preadsorbed so that they do not detect endogenous human Ig.
When applying primary Abs raised in mice to FFPE mouse tissue, inevitably secondary Abs do detect endogenous Ig, in plasma cells, B cell, intestinal epithelial cells, serum, interstitial space, and in every instance where endogenous Ig are present.1–3 This makes it impossible to use a simple primary–secondary sequence when both the source of the primary Ab and the tissue are from the same host.
To overcome this limitation, various experimental and commercial solutions have been proposed.
The simplest is to use directly conjugated primary mouse Ig, typically in fluorescence, a solution which applies best to frozen mouse tissue because the antigens are lightly fixed, a broad selection of Abs and conjugates is available, and the sensitivity is superior to FFPE tissue. Haptenated mouse primary Abs coupled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary Abs for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining may be a solution, which has not been explored thoroughly.
A solution which has been commercially made available is to somehow shield the endogenous Ig in the tissue from the detection by the secondary anti-mouse Ig, leaving only the primary Ab applied to the tissue to be detected. The application of Fab monomers of anti-mouse anti-heavy and anti-light chain Abs (H+L) before the application of the primary Ab would fit that purpose.
Alternatively, conjugated Fab fragments of anti-mouse Abs are complexed with the unconjugated primary Ab before applying to the tissue, in a sort of ad hoc conjugation of the Ab with a reporter-carrying secondary Ab.2,3
Because of these problems, most of the IHC staining on mouse tissue relies on the ever-expanding catalog of rabbit monoclonal Abs or Abs raised in goats, hamsters, rats etc., where the secondary reagents are absorbed with mouse Ig, preventing any cross-reactivity.
While experimenting with staining with mouse primary Abs on FFPE mouse tissue,4 we found a simple, straightforward solution which applies to any immunostaining, fluorescent, or in IHC, using mouse Abs on FFPE mouse tissue: anti-isotype secondary Abs.
Materials and Methods
Mouse and rat tissues were leftovers of approved experiments. Three common mouse strains were analyzed: C57Bl/6N, BalbC, and FVB/N. Rat Sprague Dawley strain was used. All animal experiments from which tissue was obtained were approved by the intramural animal welfare committee for animal experimentation of Chiesi Farmaceutici under protocol number: 449/2016-PR and comply with the European Directive 2010/63 UE, Italian D.Lgs 26/2014, and the revised “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and National Research Council, 2010).
Five-µm sections from FFPE tissue on silanized slides were dewaxed and antigen retrieved as published.5 No blocking step was performed.6 Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated.7
Primary Abs used are listed in Table 1. Incubation with appropriately diluted mouse serum or Ab dilution buffer only did not show any difference in staining (not shown). Primary Ab or control Ig incubation time was 1 hr. The anti-mouse Ig Abs or the HRP-conjugated polymers were incubated for 30 min each, all at room temperature.
Table 1.
Primary and Secondary Antibodies.
| Target | Clone | Species | Working Conc./Dilution | Cat. No. | Company | Lot | RRID:AB_ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary antibodies | |||||||||
| Nil | N/A | All isotypes (mouse serum Ig) | 2 µg/ml | 011-000-002 | JIR | 125643 | 2337187 | ||
| CTNNB1 | #14 | Mouse IgG1 | 1 µg/ml | 610154 | Becton Dickinson (BD) Pharmingen | 88001 | 397555 | ||
| Ki-67 | 8D5 | Mouse IgG1 | 1 µg/ml | SAB5300425 | Merck-Sigma | 1012212 | 10979995 | ||
| Ki-67 | UMAB107 | Mouse IgG2a | 1 µg/ml | UM800033 | Origene | UM800033 | 2629145 | ||
| TCF1/7 | C5 | Mouse IgG2a | 1 µg/ml | sc-271453 | SCBT | J1717 | 10649799 | ||
| Host | Target | Format | Specificity | Cat. No. | Working Conc./Dilution | Company | Notes | Lot | RRID:AB_ |
| Secondary antibodies | |||||||||
| Gt | IgG1 | Biotin | AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 1 specific | 115-065-205 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 100878 | 2338571 |
| Gt | IgG2a | Biotin | AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific | 115-065-206 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 104859 | 2338572 |
| Gt | IgG2a | ATTO 488 | Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific | 610-152-041 | 2 µg/ml | Rockland | Whole IgG | 31155 | 2614855 |
| Gt | IgG2a | CF488A | Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2a specific | SAB4600239 | 2 µg/ml | Sigma | Whole IgG | 11C1003 | NA |
| Gt | IgG2b | Alexa Fluor 488 | AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2b specific | 115-545-207 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 133657 | 2338856 |
| Gt | IgG2b | Alexa Fluor 680 | Affinity Purified Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 2b specific | A31564 | 2 µg/ml | Invitrogen | Whole IgG | 923450 | 1500893 |
| Gt | IgG3 | Alexa Fluor 647 | AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 3 specific | 115-605-209 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 144446 | 2338920 |
| Gt | IgG1 | Unconjugated | AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG1, Fcγ fragment specific | 115-007-185 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Fab | 126091 | 2632498 |
| Gt | IgG2a | Unconjugated | AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG2a, Fcγ fragment specific | 115-007-186 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Fab | 126677 | 2632499 |
| Gt | IgG2b | Unconjugated | AffiniPure Fab Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG2b, Fcγ fragment specific | 115-007-187 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Fab | 126866 | 2632500 |
| Gt | IgG H+L | Unconjugated | Affinity Purified Fab fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Antibody | 810-1102 | 2 µg/ml | Rockland | Fab | 29892 | 218897 |
| Rb | IgG H+L | Unconjugated | AffiPure Rabbit anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) | 315-005-045 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 113040 | 2340038 |
| Rb | Mo Fcγ | Unconjugated | AffiniPure Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ fragment specific | 315-005-046 | 2 µg/ml | JIR | Whole IgG | 125565 | 2340039 |
| Horse | Mo H+L | HRP | ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Mouse IgG PLUS Polymer Kit, Peroxidase | MP-7802 | N/A | Vector Labs | — | ZG0618 | 2336535 |
| Horse | Rb H+L | HRP | ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Rabbit IgG PLUS Polymer Kit, Peroxidase | MP-7801 | N/A | Vector Labs | — | ZF0724 | 2336536 |
| Horse | Goat H+L | HRP | ImmPRESS HRP Horse Anti-Goat IgG Polymer Kit, Peroxidase | MP-7405 | N/A | Vector Labs | — | ZG0923 | 2336526 |
Note that the secondary antibodies have been absorbed with immunoglobulins from multiple mammals (human, rabbit, mouse, rat, etc.) to avoid cross-reactivity. For individual antibody absorption, consult the commercial source. Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulins; JIR, Jackson Immuno Research; SCBT, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Gt, goat; Rb, rabbit; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; Mo, mouse.
Polymers carrying human serum-absorbed horse anti-mouse (H+L) Ig, conjugated to HRP (Table 1), were used as suggested by the manufacturer. Whole or Fab fragments of anti-mouse H+L Ig chains or anti-isotype, raised in goat and rabbit (Table 1), were counterstained with anti-goat/sheep or anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated polymers (Table 1).
The IHC stains were developed in diaminobenzidine (K3468; Agilent Technologies Italia S.p.A., Cernusco sul Naviglio, Italy), lightly counterstained in hematoxylin, mounted, and scanned on an S60 Hamamatsu scanner (Nikon; Campi Bisenzio, Italy).
Results
Polymers carrying HRP and anti-mouse H+L Ig chains raised in horse (Table 1) applied to mouse routinely processed tissue do detect endogenous Ig, diffusely in the interstitium, in plasma cells, and in gut epithelia (Fig. 1) (Table 2). Unconjugated anti-mouse H+L Abs (Table 1), whole molecules or Fab fragments, counterstained with an HRP–Ig polymer directed at the species in which they are raised (goat, rabbit) (Table 1) also detect endogenous Ig (Fig. 1) (Table 2). The anti-goat or anti-rabbit HRP–Ig polymers (Table 1), absorbed against mouse Ig, provide a clean background (Table 2) (Supplemental Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Immunostaining of C57Bl/6N mouse FFPE tissue (spleen, intestine, and lymph node) for (A) horse anti-mouse H+L polymer; (B) goat anti H+L mouse Ig, unconjugated; (C) rabbit anti H+L mouse Ig, unconjugated; (D) rabbit anti-mouse IgG heavy chains, unconjugated; (E) goat anti-mouse IgG1, biotin; (F) goat anti-mouse IgG2a, biotin; (G) goat anti-mouse IgG2b, Alexa488; (H) goat anti-mouse IgG3, Alexa647. (E–F) Extranodal mast cells (star) capture the staining sequence. Note the absence of plasma cell staining in the villi in D. B and E–H are counterstained with a Horse anti-Goat/Sheep HRP-conjugated polymer. C and D are counterstained with a horse anti-rabbit polymer. Developed in DAB. Scale bar = 100 µm. Abbreviations: FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; Ig, immunoglobulins; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; DAB, diaminobenzidine.
Table 2.
Staining of Endogenous Mouse Ig by Anti-Mouse Antibodies.
| Host | Specificity | Format | Reagent | Second Layer | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First layer | |||||
| N/A | N/A | N/A | Nil | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | Nil | Horse anti-Mouse-HRP | Positive staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 1 | Biotin | Goat a Mouse IgG1—biotin | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2a | Biotin | Goat a Mouse IgG2a—biotin | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2a | ATTO 488 | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2a | CF488A | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2b | Alexa Fluor 488 | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2b | Alexa Fluor 680 | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | PC staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 3 | Alexa Fluor 647 | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 3 | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Negative staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 1 | Unconjugated | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 1 | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | PC staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2a | Unconjugated | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2a | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | PC staining |
| Gt | Fcγ subclass 2b | Unconjugated | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fc Subclass 2b | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | PC staining |
| Gt | IgG H+L | Unconjugated | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) | Horse anti-Goat-HRP | Positive staining |
| Rb | IgG H+L | Unconjugated | Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) | Horse anti-Rabbit-HRP | Positive staining |
| Rb | Mo Fcγ | Unconjugated | Rabbit Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ fragment | Horse anti-Rabbit-HRP | Positive staining |
Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulins; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; Gt, goat; PC = plasma cells; Rb, rabbit; Mo, mouse.
Fluorochrome-conjugated Abs specific for mouse heavy chain isotypes IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3, however, fail to detect endogenous mouse Ig (Fig. 1) while providing a clean detection of exogenous mouse Abs on mouse tissue (Fig. 2) (Table 2). Reagents from four different providers (Table 1) reacted identically (Table 2). Fab monomers of anti-isotype Igs detected plasma cells in lymph node medullary cords, but not or minimally interstitial Igs (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Immunostaining of C57Bl/6N mouse formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (spleen, intestine) with anti-isotype secondary antibodies. (A) CTNNB1 (mouse IgG1 clone #14) staining of small intestine; note the membranous staining on the enterocytes and the nuclear staining in the crypt base. Scale bar: 100 µm. Inset: a low-power view of the same specimen. Secondary Ab: (Gt a Mo IgG1-biot.). (B) TCF1/7 (mouse IgG2a clone C5) nuclear staining of T cells in the spleen. Scale bar = 100 µm. Inset: Ki-67 staining (mouse IgG2a clone UMAB107) of small intestine. Scale bar = 100 µm. Secondary Ab: (Gt a Mo IgG2a, Fab). Abbreviations: Ab, antibody; Gt, goat; Mo, mouse.
To control for the difference between anti-isotypic and antiallotypic reactivity with endogenous Ig heavy chains, a rabbit Ab for the FC, but not the light-chain-containing Fab portion of mouse IgG, was applied and counterstained with a mouse-adsorbed, anti-rabbit HRP polymer, resulting in detection of endogenous Ig, except in gut IgA plasma cells (Fig. 1) (Table 2).
Anti-isotype staining of tissue from a total of three mouse strains produced identical staining (Supplemental Fig. 3).
Anti-mouse isotype Abs, which are not absorbed against rat Ig, do cross-react with rat Ig in suspension because of sequence similarities between the Ig of two closely related species; we tested whether anti-mouse isotypes would react with FFPE rat tissue and they do not (not shown).
Anti-mouse H+L Fab fragment block at 10 or 100 µg/ml did not prevent unwanted endogenous Ig staining (Supplemental Fig. 4).
Discussion
A very simple, cheap, and very efficient solution to the problem of cross-reactivity with endogenous Ig, when using mouse on mouse staining, is the use of anti-isotype secondary Abs on FFPE tissue sections. Not only the diffuse Ig-containing serum is not detected but also the dense Ig deposits within the plasma cell cytoplasm are negative.
Although limited in the variety of anti-isotype Ab suppliers and in examples of mouse tissue stainings, we believe that these findings, if confirmed by others, will broaden the use of mouse Abs on mouse FFPE experimental tissue.
Several factors, alone or in synergy, may produce this result.
Signal Dilution
The detection of only one of the two types of Ig chains may theoretically halve the reactivity when using anti-isotypes. In addition, while the light chains are common to all isotypes, the detection of isotypes further reduces the amount of detection, to the extent to which that isotype is represented among all the serum Ig. This may amount to a factor from a third to a fourth, depending on the mouse strain,8,9 to be added to the halving previously mentioned. In organs where IgA are the predominant species, both in epithelia and plasma cells, avoiding detecting the light chains is a big factor. The failure to detect the cytoplasm of IgG plasma cells in indirect IHC, however (see below), suggests that additional factors may be involved.
Conformational Epitopes
The epitope composing the isotype specificity of murine Ig may be conformational in nature10 and may be destroyed by the FFPE processing. The Fc receptor, to name one, undergoes a similar inactivation upon tissue processing6 and several other conformational epitopes as well. However, the secondary Abs are polyclonal; thus, some Ig clones reacting with the denatured epitope may exist. In IgG-containing spleen sections, robust signal amplification is required to detect those minute amounts of FFPE-proof Abs.11 It is useful to remember to this point that the efforts to raise polyclonal Abs against denatured human antigens for FFPE use failed repeatedly at the beginning of the IHC era and this may be the case for anti-isotypes.
Curiously, polyclonal Abs against both the heavy and light Ig chains, which by definition is a complex conformation of four separate proteins, two by two identical, are unfortunately very efficient at detecting denatured endogenous Ig on FFPE mouse tissue.
Preabsorption
All the reagents used have been preabsorbed against the other mouse isotypes (and human Igs). This procedure may have removed from the polyclonal Ab pool the Ig species directed against the epitopes, FFPE processing dependent or surviving, which are shared among diverse isotypes. The ones left over detect a conformational epitope(s) on the native Ig, which is destroyed upon fixation and embedding, resulting in the selective detection of the exogenous Ig applied to the section. As a confirmation of the hypothesis, an Ab raised against the mouse IgG heavy chains, not absorbed to other mouse Ig, does detect endogenous Ig in FFPE material.
Ab Format and Staining Conditions
Fluorochrome- or biotin-conjugated Abs failed to detect endogenous mouse Ig in plasma cells and in the interstitium, while Fab monomers labeled plasma cells only. Several factors may have to be taken into account for this differential reactivity. Fluorochrome or biotin conjugation adds up to the Ig molecular weight and steric hindrance, creating a bulkier product. If we add to this a short incubation time, 30 min, tailored to mimic the usual staining conditions for secondary Abs, but shortening the time to penetrate into the FFPE tissue, the combination may produce the peculiar differential reactivity we have described. To this “physical” effect, one may add the proprietary immunization protocol and affinity purification columns of the producers, which may subtly play in the recognition of soluble circulating Igs versus hypoglycosylated intracellular Ig in plasma cells, recognizing the target in an unconventional environment such as the FFPE material.
No matter what causes this very distinct unreactivity of anti-mouse Ig isotypes for FFPE mouse Ig, this effect is exploitable to expand the use of mouse Abs on mouse tissue.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining by Francesco Mascadri, Roberta Ciccimarra, Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Fabio Stellari, Francesca Ravanetti and Giorgio Cattoretti in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
Acknowledgments
We thank the laboratory technicians and animal husbandry teams who helped in this work.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: GC and FR equally designed the experiments. MMB devised the image analysis algorithms and performed visual and digital image analysis. FM and RC performed immunostaining experiments. FS provided mouse samples. GC, FR, and FS wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work has been supported by the Departmental University of Milano-Bicocca funds, by Regione Lombardia POR FESR 2014-2020, Call HUB Ricerca ed Innovazione: ImmunHUB to GC. MMB is a PhD student in the DIMET PhD Program call XXXV of the Department of Medicine and Surgery of the University of Milano-Bicocca since November 2019.
Contributor Information
Francesco Mascadri, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Roberta Ciccimarra, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
Fabio Stellari, Corporate Pre-Clinical R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy.
Francesca Ravanetti, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giorgio Cattoretti, Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Literature Cited
- 1. Lu QL, Partridge TA. A new blocking method for application of murine monoclonal antibody to mouse tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998;46(8):977–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Brown JK, Pemberton AD, Wright SH, Miller HRP. Primary antibody-Fab fragment complexes: a flexible alternative to traditional direct and indirect immunolabeling techniques. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52(9):1219–30. doi: 10.1369/jhc.3A6200.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Goodpaster T, Randolph-Habecker J. A flexible mouse-on-mouse immunohistochemical staining technique adaptable to biotin-free reagents, immunofluorescence, and multiple antibody staining. J Histochem Cytochem. 2014;62:197–204. doi: 10.1369/0022155413511620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cattoretti G, Fei Q. Application of the antigen retrieval technique in experimental pathology: from human to mouse. In: Shi S-R, Gu J, Taylor C, editors. Antigen retrieval techniques: immunohistochemistry and molecular morphology. Bradford: Eaton Pub Co; 2000;165-79. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Scalia CR, Boi G, Bolognesi MM, Riva L, Manzoni M, DeSmedt L, Bosisio FM, Ronchi S, Leone BE, Cattoretti G. Antigen masking during fixation and embedding, dissected. J Histochem Cytochem. 2017;65(1):5–20. doi: 10.1369/0022155416673995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Buchwalow I, Samoilova V, Boecker W, Tiemann M. Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts. Sci Rep. 2011;1:28. doi: 10.1038/srep00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li C, Ziesmer S, Lazcano-Villareal O. Use of azide and hydrogen peroxide as an inhibitor for endogenous peroxidase in the immunoperoxidase method. J Histochem Cytochem. 1987;35(12):1457–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bos NA, Kimura H, Meeuwsen CG, De Visser H, Hazenberg MP, Wostmann BS, Pleasants JR, Benner R, Marcus DM. Serum immunoglobulin levels and naturally occurring antibodies against carbohydrate antigens in germ-free BALB/c mice fed chemically defined ultrafiltered diet. Eur J Immunol. 1989;19(12):2335–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830191223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Klein-Schneegans AS, Kuntz L, Fonteneau P, Loor F. Serum concentrations of IgM, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG3 and IgA in C57BL/6 mice and their congenics at the lpr (lymphoproliferation) locus. J Autoimmun. 1989;2(6):869–75. doi: 10.1016/0896-8411(89)90013-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hamilton RG, Morrison SL. Epitope mapping of human immunoglobulin-specific murine monoclonal antibodies with domain-switched, deleted and point-mutated chimeric antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1993;158(1):107–22. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90263-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Casola S, Cattoretti G, Uyttersprot N, Koralov SB, Seagal J, Hao Z, Waisman A, Egert A, Ghitza D, Rajewsky K. Tracking germinal center B cells expressing germ-line immunoglobulin gamma1 transcripts by conditional gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(19):7396–401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602353103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211033239 for Background-free Detection of Mouse Antibodies on Mouse Tissue by Anti-isotype Secondary Antibodies: Mouse on Mouse Ab Staining by Francesco Mascadri, Roberta Ciccimarra, Maddalena M. Bolognesi, Fabio Stellari, Francesca Ravanetti and Giorgio Cattoretti in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry


