Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Synlett. 2019 Dec 18;31(5):450–454. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1690770

A Reduction-Sensitive Fluorous Fluorogenic Coumarin

Margeaux A Miller 1,, Rachael A Day 1,, Daniel A Estabrook 1,, Ellen M Sletten 1
PMCID: PMC8329752  NIHMSID: NIHMS1641612  PMID: 34349356

Abstract

Fluorophores that are sensitive to their environment are useful tools for sensing chemical changes and probing biological systems. Here, we extend responsive fluorophores to the fluorous phase with the synthesis of a reduction-sensitive fluorous-soluble fluorogenic coumarin. We demonstrate that this fluorophore responds to various reducing agents, most notably glutathione, a key biological reductant. The fluorous solubility of this probe allows for its encapsulation into two different fluorous nanomaterials: perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions and fluorous core-shell micelles. The fluorogenic coumarin allows us to study how efficiently these vehicles protect the contents of their interior from the external environment. In the presence of glutathione, we observe different degrees of release for micelles and emulsions. This understanding will help guide future applications of fluorous nanomaterials as drug delivery vehicles.

Keywords: fluorous, fluorogenic, fluorofluorophore, perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions, fluorous micelles, glutathione responsive, coumarin

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1641612-f0001.jpg


Chromophores that undergo changes in their photo-physical properties in response to environmental or chemical perturbations are valuable tools to gain quantitative information in complex systems.14 These probes are designed such that they either undergo a shift in λmax,abs or λmax,em, deemed solvatochromic or ratiometric, respectively, or an enhancement in quantum yield, deemed fluorogenic (Figure 1A). Thousands of solvatochromic, ratiometric, and fluorogenic probes have been prepared to measure polarity changes,15 quantify ion concentrations,69 image cellular compartments,10,11 detect metabolites,1214 sense chemical warfare agents,1518 etc. The medium of these probes can function in varies from gas phase to organic solvents to aqueous buffers; however, applications in the fluorous phase are scarce.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic of chromophores sensitive to their environment. (B) Solvatochromic fluorous fluorophore from ref. 28. (C) Fluorogenic fluorous coumarin presented herein.

The fluorous phase, composed of molecules with high weight % fluorine in sp3 C-F bonds, is orthogonal to aqueous and organic solutions. Distinct properties of the fluorous phase are extreme hydrophobicity and nonpolarizability, high gas content, narrow temperature window for the liquid phase, and decreased molecular motion.19,20 These unique attributes have resulted in a variety of applications of highly fluorinated materials including nonstick coatings, artificial blood, chemical purification strategies, and self-assembled materials.2123 Despite the broad utility of perfluorinated materials, there are relatively few chromophores and fluorophores that are soluble in the fluorous phase.2427 One of these chromophores, 9-(α-perfluoroheptyl-β,β-dicyanovinyl)julolidine (1, Figure 1B), displays solvatochromic behavior and has been used to define the spectral polarity index, PS, as a solvent polarity scale that calibrates perfluorocarbons and organics.28 Other notable fluorous sensors and probes include a fluorous copper complex, which when combined with an organic chromophore and phase, enabled histamine sensing29 as well as a fluorinated BINOL derivative for enantioselectivity measurements in the fluorous phase.30

Here, we contribute coumarin 2 (Figure 1C), the first fluorogenic fluorous soluble fluorophore. We chose coumarin as a scaffold for the development of a fluorogenic fluorous fluorophore due to literature precedent for solubilizing coumarin in perfluorocarbons24,3133 in addition to the large body of work demonstrating that coumarin fluorescence can be modulated by changes in substituents at the 7-position.3436 We envisioned that the hydroxyl group of 7-hydroxycoumarin could be alkylated with a chemically sensitive linkage connected to a fluorous tag. The branched fluorous tag imparts fluorous solubility to the starting fluorophore, while the chemically sensitive linker facilitates fluorescence turn-on. For our initial work, we chose a disulfide as the chemically sensitive linkage, which was connected to the coumarin via a self-immolating carbonate linker37 to facilitate release of 7-hydroxycoumarin.

Coumarin 2 could be prepared in two steps from 7-hydroxycoumarin 3 (Scheme 1). First, treatment of 7-hydroxycoumarin with heterobifunctional linker 438 provided 5, which contains the fluorophore and self-immolating linker with an activated disulfide.39 Displacement of pyridyl thiol from 5 was accomplished by reaction with branched fluorous thiol 640 to generate fluorous disulfide coumarin 2 in 74% yield.41 Fluorogenic coumarin 2 was stable for months when stored at 4 °C under nitrogen.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of fluorous fluorogenic coumarin 2

We evaluated the response of coumarin 2 to a variety of reducing agents. We anticipated that disulfide cleavage via a reducing agent would lead to thiol 7, which would spontaneously eliminate 1,3-oxathiolane-2-one (8) to release fluorescent 3 (Figure 2A). To test an initial panel of reducing agents, we dissolved 2 in acetone. Acetone was chosen as we have found it to be sufficient to solubilize many partially fluorinated compounds and it is miscible with water, allowing polar reducing agents to be analyzed. As can be seen in Figure 2B, upon addition of 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (BME, dark blue), dithiothrietol (DTT, green), glutathione (GSH, purple), or tris(carboxyethyl phosphine) (TCEP, orange) suggested that efficient cleavage of the disulfide in 5 was readily obtained, with fluorescence levels becoming similar to that of free 7-hydroxycoumarin after treatment.42 Importantly, if reagents that are not able to reduce disulfide bonds are added such as oxidized glutathione (Ox GSH, gray) or ethylene glycol (black), little fluorescence is observed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Cleavage of disulfide bond in the presence of reducing agent to release a free thiol that rapidly undergoes self-immolation to give fluorescent 7-hydroxycoumarin. (B) Fluorescence spectra of 2 (49.1 μM, 1:1 acetone/PBS pH 7.4) after 30 min treatment with 10 mM: glutathione (GSH, purple), tris(carboxyethylphosphine) (TCEP, orange), dithiothreitol (DTT, green), β-mercaptoethanol (BME, blue), oxidized glutathione (Ox. GSH, gray), and ethylene glycol (black). 7-hydroxycou-marin 3 (49.1 μM in 1:1 acetone/PBS) is shown in red. Inset: Long-wave UV image of 2 in 1:1 acetone/PBS before and after the addition of 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (BME). (C) Long-wave UV images of 2 (0.05 mg in 0.75 mL solvent partitioned against 0.75 mL PBS pH 7.4) Perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB), methoxyperfluorobutane (MPFB), perfluorodecalin (PFD), perfluorohexane (PFH) before and after reduction with 10 mM BME. (D) Time-dependent turn-on of 2 (19.1 βM, 1:1 acetone/PBS pH 7.4) in the presence of intra- (5–10 mM) and extracellular (0–0.1 mM) concentrations of glutathione: (0 mM, black hexagon; 0.01 mM, gray diamond; 0.1 mM, orange circle; 5 mM, red square; 10 mM, blue triangle).

Next, we moved to evaluating the fluorogenic nature of 2 in fluorous solvents. Coumarin 2 was dissolved in perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB), methoxyperfluorobutane (MPFB), perfluorodecalin (PFD), and perfluorohexanes (PFH)43 and partitioned with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Minimal signal is observed until the addition of β-mercaptoethanol (BME), at which point robust emission from the aqueous layer is apparent (Figure 2C).

Of particular interest is the response to glutathione, as glutathione levels are very high intracellularly (5–10 mM) but low extracellularly (10 μM).44,45 We further probed the turn-on kinetics of 2 under various concentrations of glutathione and found that when treated with micromolar concentrations of glutathione there was less than 10-fold turn-on over the course of an hour compared to the control (Figure 2D, orange, gray vs. black). When exposed to either 5 mM or 10 mM glutathione, the fluorescence increased over 100-fold within an hour (Figure 2D, red, blue vs. black). These data suggest that fluorogenic coumarin 2 is capable at differentiating biologically relevant glutathione levels.

One application of 2 is as a probe to measure the response of fluorous nanomaterials to intra- and extracellular conditions. Towards this end, we compared the properties of 2 encapsulated in two different delivery vehicles: (i) droplets of fluorous solvent stabilized in water, (i.e., perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions) and (ii) fluorous core-shell micelles. Our group is interested in exploiting the orthogonal nature of the fluorous phase to create advanced nanotherapeutics.24,40,4648 An important component of fluorous nanotherapeutics is the ability for fluorous-tagged molecules to be protected inside the biologically inert and nontoxic fluorous core.22,49 Fluorogenic coumarin 2 allowed us to directly test if cargo loaded into the center of the perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions or micelles sense the surrounding environment.

Perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions containing 2 were prepared by first solubilizing 2 in PFOB (982 μM) and then combining with PBS to make a biphasic solution of 10 vol% fluorous oil. A commercially available nonionic fluorosurfactant, Zonyl FSN-100 (9), was added to a surfactant loading of 2.8 wt% in PBS (Figure 3A). Emulsions were then formed through ultrasonication at the liquid–liquid interface for 90 s at 0 °C. This procedure resulted in weakly fluorescent emulsions with a diameter of 185 nm and a polydispersity of 0.13 [Figures S2, S4 in the Supporting Information (SI)]. To prepare micelles, Zonyl FSN-100 was dissolved in a stock solution of MilliQ water at 2.8 wt% (far above the critical micelle concentration), and 2 was added via an acetone stock, yielding weakly fluorescent 6 nm micelles with a polydispersity of 0.04 (Figures S3, S4 in the SI).50

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Fluorogenic coumarin 2 was loaded into either perfluorooctylbromide-in-water emulsions or micelles formed from fluorosurfactant 9. See Figures S2, S3 (SI) for size analysis of emulsions and micelles, respectively. See Figures S4, S6 (SI) for emission spectra of emulsions and micelles containing 2 at 25 °C and 37 °C, respectively. (B) Emulsions and micelles were exposed to no, low (0.1 mM, extracellular), or high (10 mM, intracellular) levels of glutathione (GSH) in PBS, and fluorescence was monitored over 48 h at 25 °C. See Figure S5 (SI) for inset. (C) Fluorescence turn-on of 2 in emulsions, micelles, or free in solution after 48 h at both 25 °C and 37 °C. See Figures S7, S8 (SI) for fluorescence traces over time at 37 °C.

To probe the role of these delivery vehicles in protecting the fluorogenic dye from the surrounding environment, nanomaterials were treated with no, low (e.g., extracellular, 0.1 mM), or high (e.g., intracellular, 10 mM) levels of glutathione in PBS. The fluorescence was then monitored over 48 h at 25 °C (Figure 3B and S4, S5 in the SI). As expected, when encapsulated in either micelles or nanoemulsions, 2 shows reduced turn-on. After a 12 h incubation in 10 mM GSH at 25 °C, micelles and emulsions show similar levels of cargo protection, having 79% and 83% less fluorescence than the free dye, respectively. After 48 h, micelles and emulsions exhibit 85% and 70% less release than the free dye, indicating that, at room temperature, micelles show delayed release kinetics over time compared to emulsions. However, after 48 h at physiological temperature (37 °C), similar levels of protection are observed for the two vehicles (Figures S6S8 in the SI). As seen in Figure 3C which compares 48 h fluorescence measurements at 25 °C or 37 °C, the micelles and emulsions both effectively reduce fluorescence by roughly 40% compared to free dye, although there is more significant turn-on of 2 at elevated temperatures. Together, these data demonstrate that encapsulation of a fluorogenic dye within the perfluorocarbon droplets or fluorous micelles effectively shields cargo from environmental stimuli. Yet, different turn-on kinetics are observed for the two vehicles, suggesting opportunities for engineering slow release of drugs by tuning the fluorous delivery vehicle.

In summary, we have prepared the first fluorogenic fluorous probe. This probe is soluble in a range of solvents and readily responds to reducing agent with over 100-fold turn-on. By incorporating 2 into either perfluorocarbon-in-water nanoemulsions or Zonyl FSN-100 stabilized micelles, turn-on can be reduced through protection of the encapsulated fluorogenic dye from the exterior environment. Over time, however, leakage dynamics of these delivery vehicles allow for the turn-on to be modulated. An understanding of the release dynamics for these systems is of interest for future applications within delayed or sustained delivery of therapeutic payloads.

Supplementary Material

SI

Funding Information

This work was funded by the following grants to E.M.S.: The University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (UC CRCC, Grant No. CNR-18-524809), the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (ACS PRF, Grant No. 57379-DNI4), the Alfred P. Sloan Award (FG-2018-10855), and the Hellman Fellows Award. M.A.M. and D.A.E. were supported by T32 training grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH, Grant No. 5T32GM008496 and 5T32GM067555-12). D.A.E. and R.A.D. were supported by the Majeti-Alapati Fellowship and the Paul Winstein Fellowship. NMR and HRMS data were obtained on instruments funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF, Grant No. MRI CHE-1048804) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH, Grant No. 1S10OD016387-01), respectively.

Biographies

graphic file with name nihms-1641612-b0002.gif

Prof. Ellen Sletten received her BSc in chemistry from Stonehill College in 2006 and PhD in chemistry in 2011 from UC Berkeley. Prof. Sletten’s graduate work was performed in Carolyn Bertozzi’s Laboratory and involved the optimization and development of bioorthogonal chemistries. Upon graduation, Prof. Sletten performed postdoctoral studies in Timothy Swager’s group at MIT, where she worked on dynamic fluorous materials. Prof. Sletten began her independent career as an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at UCLA in late 2015. The Sletten group focuses on methods to control and detect chemistries in living systems and their work has been recognized with an Alfred P. Sloan Award and NIH New Innovator Award.

graphic file with name nihms-1641612-b0007.gif

Rachael Day received her BSc in chemistry from Dordt University in 2016 and is currently pursuing her PhD in Chemical Biology in Prof. Sletten’s group at UCLA where she is studying the interactions of perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions with biological systems.

graphic file with name nihms-1641612-b0008.gif

Margeaux Miller received her BA in chemistry from Barnard College in 2016. She is currently a PhD student in Prof. Ellen Sletten’s group studying the synthesis of perfluorinated molecules and their applications in chemical biology.

graphic file with name nihms-1641612-b0009.gif

Daniel Estabrook received his BSc in chemistry from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst in 2016. He is currently a PhD student at the University of California, Los Angeles within Prof. Ellen Sletten’s group developing custom polymeric surfactants for functionalizable nanoemulsions.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1690770. Included are Figures S1S8 and experimental procedures.

References and Notes

  • (1).Klymchenko AS Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Nadler A; Schultz C Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 2408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Grimm JB; Heckman LM; Lavis LD Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci 2013, 113, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Lavis LD; Raines RT ACS Chem. Biol 2014, 9, 855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Reichardt C Chem. Rev 1994, 94, 2319. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Lee MH; Kim JS; Sessler JL Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44, 4185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Cotruvo JA Jr.; Aron AT; Ramos-Torres KM; Chang CJ Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44, 4400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Carter KP; Young AM; Palmer AE Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 4564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Zheng H; Zhan X-Q; Bian Q-N; Zhang X-J Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Malinouski M; Zhou Y; Belousov VV; Hatfield DL; Gladyshev VN PLoS One 2011, 6, e14564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Zhu H; Fan J; Du J; Peng X Acc. Chem. Res 2016, 49, 2115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Hammers MD; Pluth MD Anal. Chem 2014, 86, 7135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Yi L; Li H; Sun L; Liu L; Zhang C; Xi Z Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2009, 48, 4034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Dickinson BC; Huynh C; Chang CJ J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 5906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Burnworth M; Rowan SJ; Weder C Chem. Eur. J 2007, 13, 7828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Zhang S-W; Swager TM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 3420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Dale TJ; Rebek JJ Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 4500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Díaz de Greñu B; Moreno D; Torroba T; Berg A; Gunnars J; Nilsson T; Nyman R; Persson M; Pettersson J; Eklind I; Wästerby PJ Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 4125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Gladysz JA; Jurisch M Top. Curr. Chem 2012, 308, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Riess JG Artif. Cells, Blood Substitutes, Biotechnol 2005, 33, 47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Gladysz JA; Curran DP; Horváth IT Handbook of Fluorous Chemistry; Wiley-VHC: Weinheim, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Krafft MP; Riess JG J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem 2007, 45, 1185. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Riess JG Artif. Cells, Blood Substitutes, Biotechnol 2006, 34, 567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Sletten EM; Swager TM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 13574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Sun H; Putta A; Kloster JP; Tottempudi UK Chem. Commun 2012, 48, 12085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Yoshinaga K; Swager T Synlett 2018, 29, 2509. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Kölmel DK; Hörner A; Castañeda JA; Ferencz JAP; Bihlmeier A; Nieger M; Bräse S; Padilha LA J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 4538. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Freed BK; Biesecker J; Middleton WJ J. Fluor. Chem 1990, 48, 63. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).El Bakkari M; Fronton B; Luguya R; Vincent J-MJ Fluor. Chem 2006, 127, 558. [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Wang C; Wu E; Wu X; Xu X; Zhang G; Pu LJ Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 3747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Kirrane TM; Middleton WJ J. Fluor. Chem 1993, 62, 289. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Matsui M; Shibata K; Muramatsu H; Sawada H; Nakayama M Chem. Ber 1992, 125, 467. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Matsui M; Joglekar B; Ishigure Y; Shibata K; Muramatsu H; Murata Y Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 1993, 66, 1790. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Setsukinai K; Urano Y; Kikuchi K; Higuchi T; Nagano TJ Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2 2000, 2453. [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Muthuramu K; Ramamurthy VJ Photochem. 1984, 26, 57. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Taneja L; Sharma AK; Singh RD J. Lumin 1995, 63, 203. [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Satyam A Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2008, 18, 3196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Latorre A; Couleaud P; Aires A; Cortajarena AL; Somoza A Eur. J. Med. Chem 2014, 82, 355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).2-Oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl [2-(Pyridin-2-yldisulfaneyl)ethyl] Carbonate (5) To activated disulfide 4 (600 mg, 1.64 mmol, 1.00 equiv) was added 7-hydroxy coumarin 3 (318 mg, 1.97 mmol, 1.20 equiv), DMF (31 mL, 0.05 M), and DMAP (23 mg, 0.20 mmol, 0.12 equiv). To the solution was added DIPEA (340 μL, 1.97 mmol,1.20 equiv). The solution was stirred for 21 h at room temperature and then concentrated. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 35% → 50% EtOAc/hexanes). Extensive drying provided the product as a white amorphous solid (427 mg, 1.14 mmol, 70% yield). Rf= 0.17 (in 40% EtOAc/hexanes). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.49 (ddd, J = 4.8, 1.8, 1.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.71–7.62 (m, 3 H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H),7.21 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.16–7.08 (m, 2 H), 6.41 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.16 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.3, 159.3, 154.8, 153.3, 152.6, 150.0, 142.8, 137.2, 128.8, 121.2, 120.3, 117.8, 117.0, 116.5, 110.0, 66.7, 36.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C + 17H14NO + 5S2 [M + H]+ : 376.0313; found: 376.0307.
  • (40).Miller MA; Sletten EM Org. Lett 2018, 20, 6850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Fluorous Fluorogenic Coumarin 2To fluorous thiol 6 (120 mg, 0.158 mmol, 1.10 equiv) was added 5 (54 mg, 0.14 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and CHCl3 (2.9 mL, 0.05 M). The solution became pale yellow within 5 min and became more yellow over time. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 18 h. The crude product was evaporated onto silica from CHCl3 and purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 20% → 40% → 60% EtOAc/hexanes) to afford the product as a white solid (107 mg, 0.105 mmol, 75% yield). The average yield across three reactions was 74%. Rf= 0.66 (in 40% EtOAc/hexanes). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.69 (dd, J = 9.6, 0.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.22 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.14 (dd, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.42 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.55 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.04 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.79 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.19–2.05 (m, 4 H), 1.90 (h, J =6.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.84–1.67 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 160.3, 154.8, 153.3, 152.8, 142.8, 128.8, 117.7, 117.1, 116.5, 110.0, 66.8, 43.2, 36.8, 36.7, 28.2 (t, JCF = 22.6 Hz), 23.0 (t, JCF = 31.4 Hz). 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −80.6 to −80.9 (m), – 114.2 to −114.5 (br s, 4 F), −121.9 (br s, 4 F), −122.8 (br s, 4 F), – 123.3 (br s, 4 F), −125.9 to −126.3 (m, 4 F). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C30H F + 20 26O5S2 [M + H] : 1019.0415; found: 1019.0405.
  • (42).TCEP is rapidly oxidized in phosphate buffers at pH 7.4, likely leading to reduced signal. See: Han JC; Han GY Anal. Biochem 1994, 220, 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Although 2 was soluble in fluorous solvent, there was aggregation seen via a hypsochromic shoulder in the absorbance spectra in all solvents tested (Figure S1 in the SI).
  • (44).Smith CV; Jones DP; Guenthner TM; Lash LH; Lauterburg BH Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 1996, 140, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Montero D; Tachibana C; Rahr Winther J; Appenzeller-Herzog C Redox Biol. 2013, 1, 508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Sletten EM; Swager TM Chem. Sci 2016, 7, 5091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Day RA; Estabrook DA; Logan JK; Sletten EM Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 13043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Estabrook DA; Ennis AF; Day RA; Sletten EM Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 3994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Winter PM Scientifica (Cairo) 2014, 2014, 746574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).This is in agreement with a previous study that found Zonyl FSN-100 to adopt 3.0 nm spherical core-shell micelles in aqueous solutions, with a compact fluorous core of 1.36 nm and hydrated shell of 0.84 nm. See: Škvarla J; Uchman M; Procházka K; Tošner Z; Garamus VM; Pispas S; Štěpánek M Colloids Surf., A 2014, 443, 209. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES