Abstract
White matter (WM) abnormalities are repeatedly demonstrated across the schizophrenia time-course. However, our understanding of how demographic and clinical variables interact, influence, or are dependent on WM pathologies is limited. The most well-known barriers to progress are heterogeneous findings due to small sample sizes and the confounding influence of age on WM.
The present study leverages access to the harmonized diffusion magnetic-resonanceimaging data and standardized clinical data from 13 international sites (597 schizophrenia patients (SCZ)). Fractional anisotropy (FA) values for all major WM structures in patients were predicted based on FA models estimated from a healthy population (n=492). We utilized the deviations between predicted and real FA values to answer three essential questions. 1) “Which clinical variables explain WM abnormalities?”. 2) “Does the degree of WM abnormalities predict symptom severity?”. 3) “Does Sex influence any of those relationships?”.
Regression and mediator analyses revealed that a longer duration-of-illness is associated with more severe WM abnormalities in several tracts. Additionally, they demonstrated that a higher antipsychotic medication dose is related to more severe corpus callosum abnormalities. A structural equation model demonstrated that patients with more WM abnormalities display higher symptom severity. Last, the results exhibited sex-specificity. Males showed a stronger association between duration-of-illness and WM abnormalities. Females presented a stronger association between WM abnormalities and symptom severity, with IQ impacting this relationship.
Our findings provide clear evidence for the interaction of demographic, clinical, and behavioral variables with WM pathology in SCZ. Our results also point to the need for longitudinal studies, directly investigating casualty and sex specificity of these relationships, as well as the impact of cognitive resiliency on structure-function relationships.
Introduction
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe mental disorder with lifelong consequences for patients, their families, and society,e.g.,1. With the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it became possible to gain insight into the structural pathology of SCZ in vivo2. Specifically, diffusion MRI (dMRI) allows the characterization of white matter (WM) microstructure and brain connectivity3. Most dMRI studies have utilized fractional anisotropy (FA) measure, and FA reductions are frequently interpreted as indicators of compromised WM (e.g., fiber density, myelination, or tract coherence)4. Earlier studies have reported widespread FA reductions across multiple WM areas5-7 at all stages of SCZ8-13.
While previous studies have established the importance of WM abnormalities for the pathology of SCZ, it is still unclear how the clinical course of SCZ interacts, influences, or is dependent upon observed abnormalities. Several demographic and clinical variables, including age, sex14, 15, IQ16, 17, duration-of-illness18-22, medication23-26, and symptom severity12, 27-29, can be predictive of the clinical outcome in SCZ. However, we are far from being able to disentangle the primary pathophysiology of schizophrenia from the secondary effects of these variables.
Small sample sizes hamper most imaging studies30, resulting in low statistical power and an inability to model the dynamic and complex interplay between WM structure, demographic, and clinical variables. Therefore, multicenter efforts have led to the creation of large scale dMRI datasets. Two principal approaches have been employed to combine multisite imaging data. Meta-analyses process each dataset separately and apply statistical approaches to pool summary statistics from all sites5, 31. Harmonization approaches32, on the other hand, are applied at the signal level early in the preprocessing pipeline. They thereby remove scanner, software, and site-specific effects from the dMRI signal. Thus, after harmonization, the multisite dMRI data can be jointly analyzed as if acquired on the same scanner, allowing for the proceeding application of any data processing and model fitting.
Our group recently developed a novel dMRI data harmonization method and validated it utilizing several datasets33. We previously utilized this method to harmonize multisite dMRI data to explore WM differences between 490 healthy individuals (HC) and 597 patients with SCZ34. We modeled FA trajectories for both patients and HC, demonstrating age and region-specific WM abnormalities in SCZ34.
The present study aims to extend our previous work by examining demographic and clinical variables associated with abnormal WM trajectories. To do so, we developed strategies to standardize retrospectively collected clinical and cognitive data across different studies and international sites. We predict each patient’s FA values based on healthy FA trajectories and utilize the difference between predicted and real FA values for all analyses. We hypothesize that a longer duration-of-illness and greater antipsychotic medication will be associated with the largest deviations from healthy FA. We apply a structural equation model (SEM) approach to test whether deviations from healthy FA trajectories predict symptom severity and whether IQ interacts with this structure-function association. Last, we examine if any postulated relationships exhibit sexual dimorphism to characterize sex-specific vulnerability to SCZ.
Methods
Participants, image acquisition and processing
A detailed description of participants, image acquisition, and preprocessing can be found in our previous work34. Briefly, we utilized data from participants recruited and scanned at 13 independent international sites (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1). Data from all sites included patients with SCZ and matched HC, except for the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) data set. The PNC data, which only collected data from HC, was added to more precisely model normative FA trajectories for our analyses. The original studies’ principal investigators provided all data (except the PNC data set) following institutional IRB approvals to share and analyze de-identified data. The PNC data was downloaded following NIH approval.
Table 1:
Demographics
| Sample Size | Sex | Age (years) | Years of education (years) |
Race | IQ | Handedness | Medication dosage | Duration-of-illness (years) |
Age of onset (years) |
Positive Symptoms |
Negative Symptoms |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M: Male F: Female |
Mean +/− std | Mean +/− std | 1: African American 2: Caucasian 3: Other |
Mean +/− std | (%) 0: Right 1: Either 2: Left |
Current CPZ 1: 0 mg 2: 300 mg/day 3: 300-1000 mg/day 4: > 1000 mg/day |
Mean +/− std | Mean +/− std | Mean +/− std | Mean +/− std | ||
| Everyone | 597 | M:380 F:217 |
31.31 +/− 12.05 | 13.18 +/− 2.35 | 1: 16% 2: 41% 3: 14% |
100.73 +/− 16.85 Current IQ only: 102.11+/− 16.53 |
0: 67% 1: 2% 2: 11% |
1: 14% 2: 34% 3: 31% 4: 4% |
9.13 +/− 10.47 M: 9.38 +/− 10.71 F: 8.73 +/− 10.06 (T=.69, df=519, p<.49) |
21.64 +/− 6.90 M: 20.96 +/− 6.09 F: 22.77 +/− 7.89 (T=−2.93, df=519, p<.004) |
1.79 +/− .52 | 1.48 +/− .43 |
| CMH | 76 | M: 48 F: 28 |
36.11 +/− 12.18 | 13.66 +/− 2.40 | 1: 15% 2:42% 3:7% |
110.41 +/− 13.11 | 0:80% 1:1% 2:11% |
1:9% 2:40% 3:40% 4:1% |
13.60 +/−11.33 | 22.1 +/−5.67 | 1.43 +/−.40 | 1.27 +/− .29 |
| MRC | 42 | M:32 1:10 |
37.67 +/− 10.83 | 13.05 +/− 2.08 | 1:48% 2:45% 3:7% |
99.02 +/− 15.06 | 0:83% 1:2% 3:14% |
1:5% 2:38% 3:41% 4:7% |
16.76 +/−12.16 | 20.90 +/− 6.45 | 1.59 +/−.41 | 1.61 +/−.38 |
| ZHH | 24 | M: 11 F:13 |
37.08 +/− 8.55 | 13.52 +/− 2.80 | 1: 25% 2: 29% 3: 25% |
95.14 +/− 13.84 | 0:71% 1:8% 2:8% |
2: 38% 3: 29% 4: 4% |
17.67 +/− 11.20 | 19.86 +/− 7.57 | 1.51 +/− .44 | 1.63 +/−.36 |
| Biceps | 46 | M: 29 F: 17 |
25.80 +/− 6.38 | 13.74 +/− 1.99 | 1:14% 2:28% 3:3% |
109.30 +/− 14.10 | 0:40% 2:6% |
2:52% 3:44% 4:2% |
3.93 +/− 2.27 | 21.96 +/− 5.74 | 1.53 +/− .32 | 1.27 +/− .35 |
| Bsnip Baltimore | 51 | M: 35 F: 16 |
33.86 +/− 10.69 | 12.71 +/− 2.16 | 1:47% 2:47% 3:6% |
92.39 +/−17.80 | 0:90% 2:10% |
2:22% 3:57% 4:6% |
13.14 +/− 9.42 | 20.73 +/− 6.82 | 1.82 +/−.50 | 1.44 +/− .29 |
| Bsnip Hartford | 74 | M:43 F:31 |
33.26 +/− 11.43 | 13.13 +/− 2.23 | 1:14% 2:72% 3:11% |
97.01 +/−15.75 | 0:82% 1:3% 2:11% |
2:37% 3:40% 5:23% |
10.31 +/− 9.90 | 21.51 +/− 8.19 | 1.84 +/− .47 | 1.57 +/− .48 |
| BWH-1 | 37 | M:25 F:12 |
37.70 +/− 14.18 | 13.35 +/− 2.29 | 1:22% 2:35% 3:5% |
102.68 +/− 15.21 | 0:54% 2:5% |
1:11% 2:22% 3:16% |
10.39 +/− 12.78 | 21.41 +/− 4.45 | 1.69 +/− .57 | 1.35 +/− .21 |
| BWH-2 | 43 | M:37 F:6 |
33.47 +/− 13.92 | 13.38 +/− 2.57 | 1:12% 2:58% 3:9% |
108.65 +/− 16.24 | 0:67% 2:7% |
1:12% 2:54% 3:9% |
6.43 +/− 9.66 | 22. 58 +/− 6.47 | 1.60 +/− .57 | 1.46 +/− .38 |
| AMC | 48 | M: 18 F:30 |
28.85 +/− 6.28 | 3:100% | Current IQ: 97.58+/−15.84 | 2:69% 3:23% 4:4% |
||||||
| Oxford | 47 | M:28 F:19 |
16.49 +/− 1.20 | Current IQ: 89.41 +/− 17.76 | 0:43% 1:13% 2:6% |
2:36% 3:47% |
2.07 +/−1.59 | 14.20 +/− 1.64 | 2.34+/− .23 | |||
| UB | 46 | M:28 F: 18 |
38.37 +/− 11.43 | 13.36 +/− 3.10 | 2:100% | IQ measured by nonverbal intelligence test, not included in analyses | 0:100% | 1:9% 2:35% 3:46% 4:11% |
12.92 +/− 12.29 | 25.90 +/− 7.70 | 1.95 +/− .50 | 1.91 +/− .49 |
| NSU | 63 | M: 46 F: 17 |
21.31 +/− 4.94 |
12.32 +/− 1.91 | 0:64% 2:33% |
1:100% | 2.17 +/− 3.58 | 19.13 +/− 4.62 | 2.29 +/−.39 | 1.37 +/− .43 |
Abbreviations: IQ= intelligent quotient, Std= standard deviation, CPZ= chlorpromazine equivalent dosage, Dataset: MRC - Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, CMH - Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, ZHH - Zucker Hillside Hospital, Biceps - Brain Imaging, Cognitive Enhancement, and Early Schizophrenia, BWH - Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Oxford - Warneford Hospital, Bsnip - Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network for Intermediate Phenotypes, AMC - Asan Medical Center, UB - University of Bern, NSU - North Shore University Medical Center
Multisite dMRI data underwent thorough quality control, and consistent preprocessing was employed across sites using our open-source software (https://github.com/pnlbwh/pnlutil). Next, our dMRI harmonization procedure was applied (https://github.com/pnlbwh/dMRIharmonization33). The performance of our harmonization method has been well-validated in multiple studies33-37. Please refer to the supplementary materials for the details of the harmonization approach (Supplementary Figure 1). After the harmonization procedure removed scanner-, site-, and sequence-specific effects from the dMRI signal while preserving individual anatomical variability (Supplementary Figures 2 and 3), we registered FA maps of all harmonized dMRI data to the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) Human Brain FA Atlas version 4.1. We decided on the IIT Human Brain Atlas, given that it combines several advantages over other templates, including high image sharpness, no visible artifacts, low noise level, and high spatial resolution38. For each subject, average FA was estimated for the 14 largest WM tracts. Given that our previous studies on the same dataset did not show any effect of hemisphere34, 39, we averaged FA values for left and right WM tracts. Additionally, we averaged FA of the cingulum bundle hippocampal and cingulate gyrus parts to get one cingulum bundle (CB) measure. Thus, the analyses for the present study were conducted on seven tracts: forceps minor, forceps major, CB, inferiorfronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior-longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior-longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and uncinate-fasciculus (UF) (Supplementary Figure 4).
Demographic and clinical data standardization
Given that the demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively across multiple international studies, we determined the following criteria to standardize demographic and clinical information in the best possible manner. Standardization was carried out by the board-certified clinical psychologist J.W. and psychiatrist Ma.Ke., both with extensive clinical experience and numerous publications in psychometrics40, 41.
The SCZ group included subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. For detailed information about diagnostic, inclusion-and exclusion criteria of the single studies, please see Supplementary Table 2. Handedness was determined as right, left, or both based on the Annett, Andreasen, or Edinburgh assessment methods42, 43. We grouped race into either African American, Caucasian, or other/unknown based on the available information. IQ estimates were obtained using either a Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) full-Scale IQ test, or a premorbid IQ reading test (Wide Range Achievement Test [WRAT], or the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading [WTAR]) (Table 1)44-47. First, we investigated the combined premorbid and postmorbid IQ scores. For our secondary analyses, we restricted all IQ-related analyses to patients with premorbid IQ measurements only.
We derived Positive and Negative symptoms scores from either the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)48-50. After evaluating both the item and label definitions, we found seven positive symptoms (Delusions, Conceptual Disorganization, Hallucinations, Excitement, Grandiosity, Suspiciousness, and Hostility) and two negative symptoms (Blunted Affect and Emotional Withdrawal) to be equivalent in the PANSS and BPRS. Given different definitions of the individual scale scores of PANSS and BPRS, we did not use the original 7-point rating scales but transformed them into 4-point scales (0-no symptoms / 1-mild / 2-moderate / 3-severe). Finally, we averaged all seven positive symptoms to compose a positive symptom index for each patient. The same was done for the two negative items to compose a negative symptom index.
To determine the influence of medication on WM, we calculated the chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (CPZ) on the day of scanning, utilizing previously established conversions (Supplementary Table 3). Given that CPZ only approximates medication dosage, we opted to use a categorical CPZ approach introduced by Sohler et al.51 and separated patients into four groups (CPZ=0, CPZ<300mg/day, CPZ 300-1000mg/day, CPZ >1000mg/day).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and Amos Version 24.
Based on the observations from our previous publication34, 39, and multiple other lifespan studies52-54, we generated FA trajectories from the HC data by conducting separate quadratic regressions for each tract, with age and age squared as the independent variables and FA of each tract as the dependent variable. We utilized the parameters from the model that was derived from the HC population only to predict FA for each tract of each patient with SCZ. Next, we calculated the difference between the predicted and real FA value for each tract and each patient with SCZ. We termed this difference FA deviation and used it for all further analyses. We utilized FA deviations instead of absolute FA values for several reasons. This approach allowed us to first regress out the effect of healthy aging on FA. Second, we were able to investigate the influence of demographic and clinical variables on WM pathologies in patients independently of the effects of healthy aging. Please note that larger FA deviations present lower absolute FA values in patients compared to age-matched HC and, consequently, more severe WM impairments.
All analyses were Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons across seven tracts (p< 0.007), and two-tailed tests were utilized for all group comparisons.
Age and duration-of-illness
We used regression and mediator analyses to explore if age and duration-of-illness influenced the FA deviations in patients. First, we conducted regression analyses separately with either age or duration-of-illness as the independent variables, sex as a covariate, and the FA deviations as the dependent variable. Next, age and duration-of-illness were added together as independent variables to determine if one mediates the other’s influence on WM. Once more, sex was added as a covariate. Finally, mediator models (implemented via the mediator module PROCESS, Model 455 in SPSS ) were utilized to test for A) a direct effect of age on FA deviations and B) an indirect effect of age (via the mediator duration-of-illness) on FA deviations of each tract. Sex was included as a covariate for all intermediate outcome variables (age to duration-of-illness, duration-of-illness to FA deviation, and age to FA deviation). PROCESS automatically provides a bootstrap confidence interval for every indirect effect. The bootstrap confidence interval is constructed by randomly resampling n cases from the data with replacement and estimating the bootstrap sample’s indirect effects. After repeating this resampling procedure thousands of times, an empirical representation of the sampling distribution is built. A 95% confidence interval for the indirect effect above or below zero supports the claim for mediation 56.
Please note that our decision to utilize FA deviations instead of raw FA values was motivated by our desire to investigate the influence of duration-of-illness and pathological aging in patients that would be separately of the well-known effect age has on healthy individuals’ WM structure. However, to compare our analyses with previous studies, we repeated the regression analyses with absolute FA values and present these results in the supplementary materials.
Medication
To further understand the effect of medication on WM abnormalities, we included the CPZ group as an independent variable into the regression model with the FA deviation of each tract as the dependent variable and sex and duration-of-illness as covariates.
Symptom severity and cognitive functioning
Several smaller studies explored the relationship between symptoms and WM structure10, 57-59, focusing on specific symptoms, tracts, and populations. However, results have been relatively inconsistent, and the existing evidence has not been convincing enough to demonstrate that symptoms are associated with WM tracts. The heterogeneity in populations (e.g., different duration-of-illness, symptom profiles) is one reason for the limited cross-study replication. Therefore, we opted to follow a different approach to investigate the association between WM and symptom severity in psychosis. Leveraging our well-powered sample, we aimed to test if WM structure, when estimated across the whole SCZ spectrum, is associated with symptom severity. We postulated an SEM for the subset of patients with complete clinical data (n=362). SEM combines factor analysis and multiple regression analysis to study relationships between measured and latent variables. Given that we did not measure a variable of overall structural impairment or symptom severity, we postulated both as latent variables. The FA deviations of each of the seven tracts were reflective indicators for the latent variable structural impairment. Positive and negative symptom indices were reflective indicators for symptom severity. We applied these latent variables in regression analyses to test the structural impairment’s effect on symptom severity. Next, we added IQ to the SEM to test whether it influences structural impairments and symptom severity. To account for the non-normal distribution of the data, we calculated all data paths with an asymptotically distribution-free model.
Sex
We repeated all regression analyses for males and females separately. Furthermore, sex was included as a variable in the SEM to test if 1) the overall model fit improves, 2) if the proposed association between structural impairments, symptom severity, and IQ differs between sexes.
Results
For demographic information, see Table 1.
Age and duration-of-illness
Regression analyses with FA deviation as the dependent variable, sex as a covariate, and duration-of-illness as the independent variable revealed a significant influence of duration-of-illness on the forceps major (standardized regression coefficient [B]=.14, T=3.24, p<.001), forceps minor (B=.15, T=3.40, p<.001), IFOF (B=.14, T=3.17, p<.002), and SLF (B=.16, T=3.83, p<.001). For all tracts, a longer duration-of-illness was associated with higher FA deviations. The same regression using age as the independent variable showed significant effects for the forceps major (B=.12, T=2.87, p<.004) and SLF (B=.14, T=3.41, p<.001). Here, older ages were associated with higher FA deviations. After including age and duration-of-illness in the model, only the effect of duration-of-illness remained significant (forceps minor B=.21, T=2.83, p<.005; ILF B=.29, T=3.90, p<.001), again indicating that a longer-duration-of-illness was associated with more severe WM abnormalities.
Mediator analyses demonstrated an indirect effect (mediated through duration-of-illness) of age on FA deviations of the forceps minor, IFOF, and ILF (Figure 1). These findings suggest that older ages are related to more pronounced FA abnormalities, and a longer duration-of-illness mediates this effect of age on WM abnormalities.
Figure 1: Association between white matter, age, and duration-of-illness.
We conducted regression analyses to study the influence of age and duration-of-illness on white matter (WM) abnormalities. Fractional anisotropy (FA) deviations of each tract were the dependent variables; sex was the covariate. Age (A) or duration-of-illness (B) or both (C) were entered as independent variables. We observed an effect of age and duration-of-illness on several WM tracts. Significant associations are highlighted in green. Mediator analyses (D) demonstrated that the duration-of-illness is mediating the effect of age on FA. D I) shows the direct effect of age on FA deviations (p<.007 indicates statistical significance). D II) shows the indirect effect of age on FA deviations (mediated through duration-of-illness. Bootstrap intervals are shown in [], statistical significance is given if 0 is not included in the bootstrap interval.
* indicates statistically significant associations, e 1–11 represent the residual/error variances of the endogenous variables.
Abbrevations: inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior-longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superiorlongitudinal fasciculus (SLF), uncinate fasciculus (UF), intelligence quotient (IQ).
Given the association between duration-of-illness and age-of-onset, we repeated our analyses, including age-of-onset, as an additional variable of interest. Last, we calculated all regression analyses utilizing absolute FA values instead of FA deviations to compare our results to previous studies. The additional analyses are presented in Supplementary Table 4. The supplementary results highlight that when using absolute FA values instead of FA deviations, duration-of-illness is still associated with FA of the forceps, IFOF, ILF, and SLF (even when correcting for age or age-of-onset).
Medication
The inclusion of the CPZ group to the regression model with FA deviation of each tract as the dependent variable, sex and duration-of-illness as covariates, and CPZ group as the independent variable revealed a significant effect of CPZ on the forceps major (B=.17, T=3.67, p<.001) (Table 2). Patients taking more medication showed a higher FA deviation, hence more prominent WM pathology within the largest inter-hemispheric WM connection.
Table 2:
Influence of CPZ on FA deviations
| CPZ | Duration-of-illness | Sex | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forceps major | B=.17, T= 3.67, p<.001 | B=.10, T=2.07, p<.039 | B=.14, T=3.23, p<.001 |
| Forceps minor | B=−.07, T=−1.56, p<.119 | B=.18, T=3.82, p<.001 | B=.14, T=3.12, p<.002 |
| Cingulate | B=−.03, T=−.54, p<.592 | B=.00, T=.014, p<.989 | B=.21, T=4.54, p<.001 |
| IFOF | B=.05, T=.94, p<.348 | B=.13, T=2.76, p<.006 | B=.06, T=1.33, p<.185 |
| ILF | B=−.08, T=−.1.58, p<.114 | B=.12, T=2.40, p<.017 | B=.02, T=.53, p<.595 |
| SLF | B=−.04, T=−.83, p<.404 | B=.17, T=3.54, p<.001 | B=.15, T=3.29, p<.001 |
| UF | B=−.00, T=−.12, p<.906 | B=−.00, T=−.03, p<.979 | B=.12, T=2.53, p<.012 |
Abbreviations: B= standardized regression coefficient, fractional anisotropy (FA), inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior-longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior-longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and uncinate fasciculus (UF), chlorpromazine equivalent dosage in mg (CPZ), grouped into four: CPZ=0, CPZ<300mg/day, CPZ 300-1000mg/day, CPZ >1000mg/day; tracts remained significant after Bonferroni-correction (p<0.007) are marked in blue.
Symptom severity and cognitive functioning
The SEM model represented the influence of the latent variable of overall structural impairment on the latent variable of overall symptom severity. The model fit showed good overall fit as indicated by the goodness of fit index (GFI = 0.92) and adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI = 0.86). While booth indices determine the fit between the data and the hypothesized model, the AGFI considers the number of indicators of each latent variable. Both indices range between 0 and 1, where .90 indicates a good model fit.
In line with our hypothesis of the latent variable of structural impairment, we observed a strong association between the FA deviations of all tracts and the postulated latent variable (B between 0.57 and 0.90, Figure 2). The positive symptom index was more impactful for the latent variable of symptom severity (B= 0.54) than the negative symptom index (B = 0.30). As postulated, structural impairment had a moderate influence on symptom severity (B = 0.42), suggesting that more severe WM pathology in patients leads to more severe symptoms. Last, IQ was significantly associated with structural impairments (B=−.26), showing that patients with lower IQ displayed more severe WM pathologies. The negative association between IQ and symptom severity did not reach significance (B=−.12) for patients (Figure 2). Restricting analyses to patients with premorbid IQ measurements did not have any effect on the results (Supplementary Table 5).
Figure 2: Association between white matter, symptom severity, and IQ (structural equation model).
We calculated a structural equation model (SEM) for the subset of patients with complete clinical data (n=362) to test if white matter abnormalities (WM) are related to symptom severity and if IQ influences WM and symptom severity. The fractional anisotropy (FA) deviation of each of the seven tracts were reflective indicators for the latent variable structural impairment. Positive and negative symptom indices were reflective indicators for symptom severity Figure 2 shows the standardized regression weights [B] between all reflective indicators and the latent variables and between the two latent variables and IQ. The results further demonstrate that: a) all FA deviations significantly contribute to the latent variable structural impairment (B between .57 and .90), b) positive symptoms contribute more (B=.58) to the latent variable symptom severity than negative symptoms (B=.30), c) structural impairments are positively related to symptom severity (B =.42), and d) IQ has a significant negative effect on structural impairments (B=−.26).
Abbreviations: B= standardized regression coefficient, fractional anisotropy (FA), inferiorfronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior-longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior-longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and uncinate fasciculus (UF).
Sex
When adding sex as a covariate in the regression model (independent variable: duration-of-illness, dependent variable: FA deviations), a significant effect of sex was observed on forceps major (B =.15, T=3.41, p<.001), forceps minor (B =.15, T=3.46, p<.001), CB (B =.19, T=4.32, p<.001), and SLF (B =.16, T=3.67, p<.001). Male patients displayed higher absolute FA values, and female patients higher FA deviations.
When analyzing males and females separately, the association of duration-of-illness and FA deviations remained significant for the males only (forceps major B =.19, T=3.55, p<.001; forceps minor B = .15, T=2.75, p<.006; IFOF B = .15, T=2.76, p<.006; SLF B =.20, T=3.61, p<.001) (Table 3). While a longer duration-of-illness was significantly associated with more severe WM abnormalities in males, the same was not true for females.
Table 3:
Influence of duration-of-illness for males and females separately on FA deviations
| Duration-of-illness males | Duration-of-illness females | |
|---|---|---|
| Forceps major | B=.19, T=3.55, p<.001 | B=.06, T=.85, p<.396 |
| Forceps minor | B=.15, T=2.75, p<.006 | B=.14, T=1.99, p<.048 |
| Cingulate | B=−.02, T=−.41, p<.685 | B=.03, T=.38, p<.702 |
| IFOF | B=.15, T=2.76, p<.006 | B=.11, T=1.59, p<.113 |
| ILF | B=.09, T=1.70, p<.090 | B=.09, T=1.37, p<.172 |
| SLF | B=.20, T=3.61, p<.001 | B=.11, T=1.59, p<.114 |
| UF | B=.03, T=.53, p<.599 | B=−.08, T=−1.05, p<.295 |
Abbreviations: B= standardized regression coefficient, fractional anisotropy (FA), inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior-longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior-longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and uncinate fasciculus (UF); tracts remained significant after Bonferroni-correction (p<0.007) are marked in blue.
The results of the regression analyses with the CPZ group as the independent variable were not affected when investigating males and females separately. Both sexes displayed an association between higher medication dosage and higher FA deviations in the forceps major.
Finally, when separating males from females, the SEM model fit improved (GFI=0.92, AGFI=0.87). Interestingly, the influence of structural impairment on symptom severity was more significant for females than for males (females = 0.48, males = 0.33). These findings suggest that the association between WM pathology and symptom severity is stronger in females than in males. Additionally, only the females showed a significant effect of IQ on structural impairment (B = −0.44, males = −0.17) and symptom severity (B females =−0.52, males =−0.10) (Supplementary Table 6). Lower IQ in females was associated with both a greater degree of WM pathology and more severe symptoms.
Discussion
In the present study, the large sample size of harmonized dMRI data and standardized clinical data enabled us to investigate each patient’s deviation from healthy WM trajectories, instead of looking at absolute FA values. Our results revealed several relationships between WM abnormalities and demographic and clinical variables in SCZ. Specifically, we found that a more severe deviation from healthy WM is related to a longer duration-of-illness. This finding was independent of the physiological age and more prominent in males than in females. Next, we reported that more structural impairments are associated with more severe symptoms, with IQ modulating this association. Structural impairments, symptom severity, and IQ were thereby more robustly associated with one another in females than in males.
Age and duration-of-illness
We showed that the deviation from the healthy WM trajectories of several tracts became more pronounced with a longer duration-of-illness. While some smaller studies had reported an association between WM structure and duration-of-illness18-22, 60, 61, others had not5, 18. Conflicting results may be due to several factors, including a lack of power in small sample sizes, the confounding influence of healthy aging, and region-specific effects of duration-of-illness. We observed an effect of duration-of-illness only for interhemispheric and association, but not limbic tracts. This finding coheres with previous gray matter SCZ studies reporting no effect of duration-of-illness on limbic circuitries62. Our results also align with healthy aging studies, which report relative GM preservation in limbic areas63, 64.
Medication
We observed that higher medication dose is associated with more severe corpus callosum abnormalities. Our finding is in line with several studies that report a medication effect only limited to a specific region65. However, it is worth mentioning that the results regarding the impact of antipsychotic medication on brain structure are heterogeneous23-26, 66-71. One explanation is that most studies, including ours, use normalized CPZ medication dose at the scan time. CPZ dosage at the scan time may not be ideal for evaluating the influence of lifetime medication exposure or distinguishing the effects of different antipsychotics72. Future studies that control for dose-years73, lifetime antipsychotic dosage, and consider different types of medication are needed.
Symptom severity and cognitive functioning
While many previous studies reported an association between particular WM tracts and specific symptoms12, 27-29, 74-77, we demonstrated a relationship between general structural impairment and symptom severity. Our results show that more WM abnormalities are associated with more severe symptoms (irrespective of age and region). Specifically, we observed that all WM tracts were associated with symptom severity. However, in line with some other studies, we found a more consistent association between brain structure and positive symptoms than between brain structure and negative symptoms12, 27-29, 74-77.
We were also interested in exploring the potential role of IQ for structural impairment and symptom severity. IQ impairments are commonly seen in patients with SCZ before illness onset. Additionally, IQ is a good predictor of conversion and long-term clinical outcome7, 8, 64, 16, 78-80. More specifically, studies have found that individuals with higher premorbid IQ may be more resilient to the illness than those with lower premorbid IQ81. Furthermore, a recent study reported that premorbid intelligence represents an important modifier between age-related loss of gray matter and cognitive changes in SCZ82. The authors suggested that premorbid IQ might be an indicator of cognitive reserve and that including the concept of cognitive reserve in future studies could explain inconsistencies in brain structure - cognition findings in the extant literature. Our approach of studying the impact of IQ on the structure-symptom relationship allowed us to extend this previous work. Indeed, we observed that IQ modulates both WM impairments and symptom severity in patients with SCZ. Future studies that include other indicators of cognitive reserve (e.g., education-occupational level and leisure activities) are needed, to better understand the potential role of cognitive reserve for SCZ83-85.
Taken together, our finding of an association between generalized WM abnormalities, symptom severity, and IQ is supportive of the disconnection hypothesis86. This prominent biological hypothesis states that SCZ is characterized by altered communication within, and abnormal integration between, brain systems. This abnormal communication, in turn, causes false inferences of predicted and sensory inputs87-89. Supporting evidence for this hypothesis came from functional and PET imaging studies that reported widespread abnormal functional connectivity between different brain systems while resting and performing various tasks90-93. Our findings add to the functional connectivity literature in further characterizing dysconnectivity as the core pathology in SCZ.
Sex
We observed a significant effect of sex on several tracts, including the corpus callosum, CB, and SLF. Of note, FA of limbic tracts, such as the CB, are also the most influenced by sex in healthy populations14, 15. This regionally specific effect of sex is not surprising given that receptors for the sex-specific hormones, such as estrogens or testosterone, are predominantly expressed in limbic areas94, 95, and that changes in sex hormones in these areas correlate with FA changes96. Specifically, estrogen influences WM development and degeneration, and testosterone promotes myelination97, 98.
Additionally, we demonstrated the influence of sex on the association of WM abnormalities, demographic, and clinical variables. We reported that only males showed a relationship between a longer duration-of-illness and more severe WM abnormalities. Clinical studies observed a similar pattern, reporting a more potent effect of duration-of-illness on males’ clinical outcomes than females’99. We also found that for females, IQ had a more significant influence on WM abnormalities and symptom severity than for males. Previous work had shown that IQ is more strongly correlated with WM in healthy females than in males100. Future studies need to establish why IQ is especially meaningful for female patients, and if that knowledge can be utilized to develop sex-specific psychotherapeutic treatment strategies.
Limitations and future directions
We acknowledge several limitations in the current study. Because of our study’s retrospective nature, not all relevant demographic and clinical information was available for all subjects. Additionally, clinical instruments across different international sites were quite diverse. We standardized the demographic and clinical data, following a few existing examples found in the literature. Until, however, such standardization methods are validated, our study presents only the first necessary step towards implementing demographic and clinical data harmonization standards. Next, several additional measures that likely influence the reported associations were not available. Those include the duration of untreated psychosis, substance abuse, lack of social communication, or comorbid medical disorders. Additionally, while we calculated CPZ dose at scan time, information about cumulative medication exposure was not available. As highlighted above, we think future studies must collect more detailed medication data to understand WM and medication’s complex association better. Finally, the present study is cross-sectional. While harmonization of data enabled us to model lifespan trajectories and SEM allowed for the assumption of causal relationships, one must be cautious when claiming causality using cross-sectional data. Using SEM, causal relationships between latent variables can be postulated based on previous knowledge. Hence, we hypothesized that WM impairments in SCZ could predict symptom severity. However, SEM can only indicate the plausibility of an assumed model, and to further test the causal assumption that WM impairments predict symptom severity, longitudinal studies are needed. Last, to expand the biological understanding of WM changes, these future studies should further investigate the other diffusion measures of WM (such as axial and radial diffusivity, or more advanced measures, such as NODDI or Free Water Imaging101, 102).
Conclusion
Our work presents a well-powered investigation of the relationship between WM abnormalities, demographic, and clinical variables in patients with SCZ.
We observe sex and region-specific effects of duration-of-illness on WM abnormalities that indicate a progressive pathology in the WM of patients with SCZ. We also report a link between structural impairments and symptom severity, which is modulated by IQ. Interestingly, the associations between structural impairments, symptoms, and IQ are more pronounced in females. Our study provides a significant step towards understanding the interaction between demographic and clinical variables and WM pathologies in SCZ. It is crucial to understand, which pathologies are inherent to SCZ and independent of clinical trajectories, and which are dependent on demographic and clinical variables. Future studies can then be guided regarding which demographic and clinical information should be collected to characterize SCZ best. Second, and more importantly, this will increase our understanding of the vulnerability of patients’ subgroups to the pathophysiology of SCZ. Specifically, our analysis of sex-specific vulnerability to WM pathology will provide the first step towards sex-specific monitoring and treatment strategies. Finally, future longitudinal studies are needed to further explore which variables influence and interact with individual patients’ SCZ pathophysiology.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge funding provided by the following National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants: R01MH102377, K24MH110807 (PI: Dr. Marek Kubicki), R01MH119222 (PI: Dr. Yogesh Rathi), R03 MH110745, K01 MH115247–01A1 (PI: Dr. Amanda Lyall), VA Merit Award and U01 MH109977 (PI: Dr. Martha Shenton), R01MH108574 (PI: Dr. Ofer Pasternak), MRC G0500092 (PI: Dr. Anthony James), R01MH076995 (PI: Dr. Philip Szeszko), P50MH080173 (PI: Dr. Anil K. Malhotra), 1R01 MH102318-01A1 (PI: Dr. Robert W. Buchanan), R01MH092440, MH078113 (PI: Dr. Matcheri Keshavan), MH077851 (PI: Dr. Carol Tamminga), MH077945 (PI: Dr. Godfrey Pearlson), MH077862 (PI: Dr. John Sweeney), R21MH121704 (PI: Dr. James Levitt). We also acknowledge funding provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) grant 152619 (PI: Dr. Sebastian Walther) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant NRF-2012R1A1A1006514 (PI: Dr. Jungsun Lee).
Footnotes
Disclosure
All authors report no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose.
References
- 1.Janssen EM, McGinty EE, Azrin ST, Juliano-Bult D, Daumit GL. Review of the evidence: prevalence of medical conditions in the United States population with serious mental illness. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2015; 37(3): 199–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shenton ME, Dickey CC, Frumin M, McCarley RW. A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2001; 49(1-2): 1–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Basser PJ, Jones DK. Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15(7-8): 456–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based white matter mapping in brain research: a review. J Mol Neurosci 2008; 34(1): 51–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kelly S, Jahanshad N, Zalesky A, Kochunov P, Agartz I, Alloza C et al. Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group. Mol Psychiatry 2018; 23(5): 1261–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ellison-Wright I, Nathan PJ, Bullmore ET, Zaman R, Dudas RB, Agius M et al. Distribution of tract deficits in schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kanaan RA, Borgwardt S, McGuire PK, Craig MC, Murphy DG, Picchioni M et al. Microstructural organization of cerebellar tracts in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66(11): 1067–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sun Z, Wang F, Cui L, Breeze J, Du X, Wang X et al. Abnormal anterior cingulum in patients with schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroreport October 6, 2003. 2003; 14(14): 1833–1836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Molina V, Lubeiro A, Soto O, Rodriguez M, Alvarez A, Hernandez R et al. Alterations in prefrontal connectivity in schizophrenia assessed using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2017; 76: 107–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Seitz J, Zuo JX, Lyall AE, Makris N, Kikinis Z, Bouix S et al. Tractography Analysis of 5 White Matter Bundles and Their Clinical and Cognitive Correlates in Early-Course Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karlsgodt KH, van Erp TG, Poldrack RA, Bearden CE, Nuechterlein KH, Cannon TD. Diffusion tensor imaging of the superior longitudinal fasciculus and working memory in recent-onset schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63(5): 512–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Voineskos AN, Foussias G, Lerch J, Felsky D, Remington G, Rajji TK et al. Neuroimaging evidence for the deficit subtype of schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70(5): 472–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xiao Y, Sun H, Shi S, Jiang D, Tao B, Zhao Y et al. White Matter Abnormalities in Never-Treated Patients With Long-Term Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2018: appiajp201817121402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen YJ, Liu CM, Hsu YC, Lo YC, Hwang TJ, Hwu HG et al. Individualized prediction of schizophrenia based on the whole-brain pattern of altered white matter tract integrity. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39(1): 575–587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hawco C, Voineskos AN, Radhu N, Rotenberg D, Ameis S, Backhouse FA et al. Age and gender interactions in white matter of schizophrenia and obsessive compulsive disorder compared to non-psychiatric controls: commonalities across disorders. Brain Imaging Behav 2017; 11(6): 1836–1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Woodberry KA, Giuliano AJ, Seidman LJ. Premorbid IQ in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165(5): 579–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Agnew-Blais J, Seidman LJ, Fitzmaurice GM, Smoller JW, Goldstein JM, Buka SL. The interplay of childhood behavior problems and IQ in the development of later schizophrenia and affective psychoses. Schizophr Res 2017; 184: 45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kanaan R, Barker G, Brammer M, Giampietro V, Shergill S, Woolley J et al. White matter microstructure in schizophrenia: effects of disorder, duration and medication. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 194(3): 236–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang F, Qiu L, Yuan L, Ma H, Ye R, Yu F et al. Evidence for progressive brain abnormalities in early schizophrenia: a cross-sectional structural and functional connectivity study. Schizophr Res 2014; 159(1): 31–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu CH, Hwang TJ, Chen YJ, Hsu YC, Lo YC, Liu CM et al. Primary and secondary alterations of white matter connectivity in schizophrenia: A study on first-episode and chronic patients using whole-brain tractography-based analysis. Schizophr Res 2015; 169(1-3): 54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hummer TA, Francis MM, Vohs JL, Liffick E, Mehdiyoun NF, Breier A. Characterization of white matter abnormalities in early-stage schizophrenia. Early Interv Psychiatry 2018; 12(4): 660–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cea-Canas B, de Luis R, Lubeiro A, Gomez-Pilar J, Sotelo E, Del Valle P et al. Structural connectivity in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Effects of chronicity and antipsychotic treatment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2019; 92: 369–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meng L, Li K, Li W, Xiao Y, Lui S, Sweeney JA et al. Widespread white-matter microstructure integrity reduction in first-episode schizophrenia patients after acute antipsychotic treatment. Schizophr Res 2019; 204: 238–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Serpa MH, Doshi J, Erus G, Chaim-Avancini TM, Cavallet M, van de Bilt MT et al. State-dependent microstructural white matter changes in drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis. Psychol Med 2017; 47(15): 2613–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dietsche B, Kircher T, Falkenberg I. Structural brain changes in schizophrenia at different stages of the illness: A selective review of longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017; 51(5): 500–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kraguljac NV, Anthony T, Skidmore FM, Marstrander J, Morgan CJ, Reid MA et al. Micro- and Macrostructural White Matter Integrity in Never-Treated and Currently Unmedicated Patients With Schizophrenia and Effects of Short-Term Antipsychotic Treatment. Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee JS, Han K, Lee SK, Seok JH, Kim JJ. Altered structural connectivity and trait anhedonia in patients with schizophrenia. Neurosci Lett 2014; 579: 7–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gu C, Zhang Y, Wei F, Cheng Y, Cao Y, Hou H. Magnetic resonance imaging DTI-FT study on schizophrenic patients with typical negative first symptoms. Experimental and therapeutic medicine 2016; 12(3): 1450–1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Szeszko PR, Robinson DG, Ashtari M, Vogel J, Betensky J, Sevy S et al. Clinical and Neuropsychological Correlates of White Matter Abnormalities in Recent Onset Schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33(5): 976–984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Melicher T, Horacek J, Hlinka J, Spaniel F, Tintera J, Ibrahim I et al. White matter changes in first episode psychosis and their relation to the size of sample studied: a DTI study. Schizophr Res 2015; 162(1-3): 22–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thompson PM, Jahanshad N, Ching CRK, Salminen LE, Thomopoulos SI, Bright J et al. ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Transl Psychiatry 2020; 10(1): 100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mirzaalian H, Ning L, Savadjiev P, Pasternak O, Bouix S, Michailovich O et al. Multi-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data in a registration framework. Brain Imaging Behav 2018; 12(1): 284–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cetin Karayumak S, Bouix S, Ning L, James A, Crow T, Shenton M et al. Retrospective harmonization of multi-site diffusion MRI data acquired with different acquisition parameters. Neuroimage 2019; 184: 180–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cetin-Karayumak S, Di Biase MA, Chunga N, Reid B, Somes N, Lyall AE et al. White matter abnormalities across the lifespan of schizophrenia: a harmonized multi-site diffusion MRI study. Mol Psychiatry 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harmonizing Diffusion MRI Data Across Magnetic Field Strengths. 2018; Cham. Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ning L, Bonet-Carne E, Grussu F, Sepehrband F, Kaden E, Veraart J et al. Crossscanner and cross-protocol multi-shell diffusion MRI data harmonization: Algorithms and results. Neuroimage 2020; 221: 117128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Muti-shell Diffusion MRI Harmonisation and Enhancement Challenge (MUSHAC): Progress and Results. 2019; Cham. Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang S, Arfanakis K. Evaluation of standardized and study-specific diffusion tensor imaging templates of the adult human brain: Template characteristics, spatial normalization accuracy, and detection of small inter-group FA differences. Neuroimage 2018; 172: 40–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Seitz J, Cetin-Karayumak S, Lyall A, Pasternak O, Baxi M, Vangel M et al. Investigating Sexual Dimorphism of Human White Matter in a Harmonized, Multisite Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Cereb Cortex 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Eack SM, Greeno CG, Pogue-Geile MF, Newhill CE, Hogarty GE, Keshavan MS. Assessing social-cognitive deficits in schizophrenia with the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test. Schizophr Bull 2010; 36(2): 370–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kline ER, DeTore NR, Keefe K, Seidman LJ, Srihari VH, Keshavan MS et al. Development and validation of the client engagement and service use scale: A pilot study. Schizophr Res 2018; 201: 343–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Annett M A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) 1970; 61(3): 303–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9(1): 97–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wechsler D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3 edn. Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, Texas, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wechsler D Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. Harcourt Assessment. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. WRAT 3 administration manual. Jastak Associates: Wilmington, DE, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test. Fourth Edition edn. Psychological Assessment Resources: Lutz, FL, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ventura J, Green MF, Shaner A, Liberman RP. Training and quality assurance with the brief psychiatric rating scale: "the drift busters". International journal of methods in psychiatric research 1993; 3: 221–244. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Woerner MG, Mannuzza S, J.M. K. Anchoring the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (An aid to improve reliability). Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; (24): 112–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kay SR, Fizbin A, Lindenmayer JP, Opler LA. Positive and Negative Syndromes in Schizophrenia as a Function of Chronicity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 74(5): 507–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sohler NL, Walkup J, McAlpine D, Boyer C, Olfson M. Antipsychotic dosage at hospital discharge and outcomes among persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(9): 1258–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kochunov P, Glahn DC, Lancaster J, Thompson PM, Kochunov V, Rogers B et al. Fractional anisotropy of cerebral white matter and thickness of cortical gray matter across the lifespan. Neuroimage 2011; 58(1): 41–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lebel C, Walker L, Leemans A, Phillips L, Beaulieu C. Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. Neuroimage 2008; 40(3): 1044–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lebel C, Beaulieu C. Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. J Neurosci 2011; 31(30): 10937–10947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. 2 edn. Guilford Press: New York, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hayes AF, Rockwood NJ. Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behav Res Ther 2017; 98: 39–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Whitford TJ, Kubicki M, Schneiderman JS, O'Donnell LJ, King R, Alvarado JL et al. Corpus Callosum Abnormalities and Their Association with Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiat 2010; 68(1): 70–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Knochel C, O'Dwyer L, Alves G, Reinke B, Magerkurth J, Rotarska-Jagiela A et al. Association between white matter fiber integrity and subclinical psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia patients and unaffected relatives. Schizophr Res 2012; 140(1-3): 129–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hayakawa YK, Kirino E, Shimoji K, Kamagata K, Hori M, Ito K et al. Anterior cingulate abnormality as a neural correlate of mismatch negativity in schizophrenia. Neuropsychobiology 2013; 68(4): 197–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tanskanen P, Ridler K, Murray GK, Haapea M, Veijola JM, Jaaskelainen E et al. Morphometric brain abnormalities in schizophrenia in a population-based sample: relationship to duration of illness. Schizophr Bull 2010; 36(4): 766–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schneiderman JS, Hazlett EA, Chu KW, Zhang J, Goodman CR, Newmark RE et al. Brodmann area analysis of white matter anisotropy and age in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011; 130(1-3): 57–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ellison-Wright I, Glahn DC, Laird AR, Thelen SM, Bullmore E. The anatomy of first-episode and chronic schizophrenia: an anatomical likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165(8): 1015–1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Grieve SM, Clark CR, Williams LM, Peduto AJ, Gordon E. Preservation of limbic and paralimbic structures in aging. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25(4): 391–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage, vol. 142001, pp 21–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hu M, Zong X, Zheng J, Mann JJ, Li Z, Pantazatos SP et al. Risperidone-induced topological alterations of anatomical brain network in first-episode drug-naive schizophrenia patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychol Med 2016; 46(12): 2549–2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang Q, Cheung C, Deng W, Li M, Huang C, Ma X et al. White-matter microstructure in previously drug-naive patients with schizophrenia after 6 weeks of treatment. Psychol Med 2013; 43(11): 2301–2309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zeng B, Ardekani BA, Tang Y, Zhang T, Zhao S, Cui H et al. Abnormal white matter microstructure in drug-naive first episode schizophrenia patients before and after eight weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Schizophr Res 2016; 172(1-3): 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ebdrup BH, Raghava JM, Nielsen MO, Rostrup E, Glenthoj B. Frontal fasciculi and psychotic symptoms in antipsychotic-naive patients with schizophrenia before and after 6 weeks of selective dopamine D2/3 receptor blockade. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016; 41(2): 133–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Reis Marques T, Taylor H, Chaddock C, Dell'acqua F, Handley R, Reinders AA et al. White matter integrity as a predictor of response to treatment in first episode psychosis. Brain 2014; 137(1): 172–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kates WR, Olszewski AK, Gnirke MH, Kikinis Z, Nelson J, Antshel KM et al. White matter microstructural abnormalities of the cingulum bundle in youths with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: associations with medication, neuropsychological function, and prodromal symptoms of psychosis. Schizophr Res 2015; 161(1): 76–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ho BC, Andreasen NC, Ziebell S, Pierson R, Magnotta V. Long-term antipsychotic treatment and brain volumes: a longitudinal study of first-episode schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68(2): 128–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tishler TA, Bartzokis G, Lu PH, Raven EP, Khanoyan M, Kirkpatrick CJ et al. Abnormal Trajectory of Intracortical Myelination in Schizophrenia Implicates White Matter in Disease Pathophysiology and the Therapeutic Mechanism of Action of Antipsychotics. Biological psychiatry : cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging 2018; 3(5): 454–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Andreasen NC, Pressler M, Nopoulos P, Miller D, Ho BC. Antipsychotic dose equivalents and dose-years: a standardized method for comparing exposure to different drugs. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67(3): 255–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang X, Cao D, Liang X, Zhao J. Schizophrenia symptomatic associations with diffusion tensor imaging measured fractional anisotropy of brain: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2017; 59(7): 699–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Peters BD, de Haan L, Dekker N, Blaas J, Becker HE, Dingemans PM et al. White matter fibertracking in first-episode schizophrenia, schizoaffective patients and subjects at ultra-high risk of psychosis. Neuropsychobiology 2008; 58(1): 19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kawashima T, Nakamura M, Bouix S, Kubicki M, Salisbury DF, Westin CF et al. Uncinate fasciculus abnormalities in recent onset schizophrenia and affective psychosis: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Schizophr Res 2009; 110(1-3): 119–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Luck D, Buchy L, Czechowska Y, Bodnar M, Pike GB, Campbell JSW et al. Fronto-temporal disconnectivity and clinical short-term outcome in first episode psychosis: A DTI-tractography study. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2011; 45(3): 369–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Amoretti S, Cabrera B, Torrent C, Mezquida G, Lobo A, Gonzalez-Pinto A et al. Cognitive reserve as an outcome predictor: first-episode affective versus non-affective psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 138(5): 441–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Cuesta MJ, Sanchez-Torres AM, Cabrera B, Bioque M, Merchan-Naranjo J, Corripio I et al. Premorbid adjustment and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in first-episode psychosis. The PEPsCog Study. Schizophr Res 2015; 164(1-3): 65–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Eberhard J, Riley F, Levander S. Premorbid IQ and schizophrenia. Increasing cognitive reduction by episodes. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003; 253(2): 84–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Barnett JH, Salmond CH, Jones PB, Sahakian BJ. Cognitive reserve in neuropsychiatry. Psychol Med 2006; 36(8): 1053–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Van Rheenen TE, Cropley V, Fagerlund B, Wannan C, Bruggemann J, Lenroot RK et al. Cognitive reserve attenuates age-related cognitive decline in the context of putatively accelerated brain ageing in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Psychol Med 2019: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.de la Serna E, Andres-Perpina S, Puig O, Baeza I, Bombin I, Bartres-Faz D et al. Cognitive reserve as a predictor of two year neuropsychological performance in early onset first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2013; 143(1): 125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Amoretti S, Bernardo M, Bonnin CM, Bioque M, Cabrera B, Mezquida G et al. The impact of cognitive reserve in the outcome of first-episode psychoses: 2-year follow-up study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2016; 26(10): 1638–1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Amoretti S, Cabrera B, Torrent C, Bonnin CDM, Mezquida G, Garriga M et al. Cognitive Reserve Assessment Scale in Health (CRASH): Its Validity and Reliability. Journal of clinical medicine 2019; 8(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Friston KJ. The disconnection hypothesis. Schizophrenia Research 1998; 30(2): 115–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Friston K, Brown HR, Siemerkus J, Stephan KE. The dysconnection hypothesis (2016). Schizophrenia research 2016; 176(2-3): 83–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schmitt A, Hasan A, Gruber O, Falkai P. Schizophrenia as a disorder of disconnectivity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011; 261 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S150–S154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Friston KJ. Dysfunctional connectivity in schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 2002; 1(2): 66–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang J, Cheng W, Liu Z, Zhang K, Lei X, Yao Y et al. Neural, electrophysiological and anatomical basis of brain-network variability and its characteristic changes in mental disorders. Brain 2016; 139(Pt 8): 2307–2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Takano Y, Aoki Y, Yahata N, Kawakubo Y, Inoue H, Iwashiro N et al. Neural basis for inferring false beliefs and social emotions in others among individuals with schizophrenia and those at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2017; 259: 34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wojtalik JA, Smith MJ, Keshavan MS, Eack SM. A Systematic and Meta-analytic Review of Neural Correlates of Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2017; 43(6): 1329–1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Furuichi A, Kawasaki Y, Takahashi T, Nakamura K, Tanino R, Noguchi K et al. Altered neural basis of self-reflective processing in schizophrenia: An fMRI study. Asian J Psychiatr 2019; 45: 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Vegeto E, Villa A, Della Torre S, Crippa V, Rusmini P, Cristofani R et al. The role of sex and sex Hormones in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Endocrine reviews 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Sex differences in the adolescent brain. Brain Cogn 2010; 72(1): 46–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ho TC, Colich NL, Sisk LM, Oskirko K, Jo B, Gotlib IH. Sex differences in the effects of gonadal hormones on white matter microstructure development in adolescence. Developmental cognitive neuroscience 2020; 42: 100773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Arvanitis DN, Wang H, Bagshaw RD, Callahan JW, Boggs JM. Membrane-associated estrogen receptor and caveolin-1 are present in central nervous system myelin and oligodendrocyte plasma membranes. Journal of neuroscience research 2004; 75(5): 603–613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Wischhof L, Irrsack E, Osorio C, Koch M. Prenatal LPS-exposure--a neurodevelopmental rat model of schizophrenia--differentially affects cognitive functions, myelination and parvalbumin expression in male and female offspring. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2015; 57: 17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Bergen SE, O'Dushlaine CT, Lee PH, Fanous AH, Ruderfer DM, Ripke S et al. Genetic modifiers and subtypes in schizophrenia: investigations of age at onset, severity, sex and family history. Schizophr Res 2014; 154(1-3): 48–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Schmithorst VJ. DEVELOPMENTAL SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE RELATION OF NEUROANATOMICAL CONNECTIVITY TO INTELLIGENCE. Intelligence 2009; 37(2): 164–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Pasternak O, Sochen N, Gur Y, Intrator N, Assaf Y. Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62(3): 717–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Pasternak O, Shenton ME, Westin CF. Estimation of extracellular volume from regularized multi-shell diffusion MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2012; 15(Pt 2): 305–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


