Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2021 Jun 2;16(10):1934295. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1934295

Roles of single gene in plant hypoxia and pathogen responses

Hu Tang a,b, Huanhuan Liu a,
PMCID: PMC8331024  PMID: 34077334

ABSTRACT

Hypoxia stress can be caused by submergence or pathogen infection. These two stresses often occur sequentially or at the same time in nature. Therefore, plants have evolved economical and efficient strategies to deal with them, such as “single-gene multi-functions”, that is, one gene could play roles in hypoxia or pathogen responses at the corresponding stress. This review mainly introduces the ERF-VII (ethylene response factor VII) and WRKYs (WRKY transcription factors) that can play roles in these two stresses. Meanwhile, the relationship between hypoxia and pathology has certain similarities in animals and plants, so we can learn from their related studies and develop new ideas for disease therapy and breeding.

KEYWORDS: Hypoxia, pathogen response, ERF-VII, N-degron pathway, WRKY33, WRKY12

Introduction

Hypoxia is considered as a double-edged sword for it is not only an abiotic stress but also a development signal.1, 2 Hypoxia stress often is caused by waterlogging or submergence and will affect the growth and yields of plants. Flooding is a compound stress, mainly including hypoxia and pathogen stress. Multiple signaling pathways and transcriptional regulations are triggered, and ERF-VII transcription factors (including five members: HRE1, HRE2, RAP2.2, RAP2.3, RAP2.12)3 take a highlight position for its core role in oxygen sensing and signaling.4,5 ERFVIIs have been linked also with other abiotic stresses too.6 Our previous research “WRKY33 interacts with WRKY12 protein to up-regulate RAP2.2 during submergence-induced hypoxia response in Arabidopsis thaliana” demonstrated the interplay between RAP2.2 and the two WRKYs attributed to adaptation to submergence-induced hypoxia stress in Arabidopsis.7 Interestingly, these genes are all known for their positive roles in plant pathogens response,8–10 and flooding will increase plants’ susceptibility to pathogens,11 then defense and hypoxia are likely correlated with the WRKY network. Corresponding to this, Botrytis cinerea infection generates local hypoxia in the leaf,12 in the case of tumorigenic root tissues or gall-forming pathogens Plasmodiophora brassicae and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, plant responds to the infection by activating various hypoxia-related genes.13,14 That inspires us to think the relationship between hypoxia and pathogen responses. Another review published last year discussed the impact of hypoxia on cellular physiology in fungal pathogens,15 while did not introduce detailed functions of the related genes. Plants incline to choose the most economical way that one-to-many or single-multifunctional-gene to regulate the development and stress responses, or the activation of innate immunity could have coevolved with submergence response,16 so what roles of the ERF-VII play in defense response? Here, we summarize these multifunctional genes response both in hypoxia and pathogen response (Table 1) and their potential mechanisms.

Table 1.

The biological roles of some genes related to both hypoxia and pathogen response in Arabidopsis, rice and barley.

Genes Loc Hypoxia response Pathogen tolerance Reference
AtWRKY33 AT2G38470 Positively Positive against necrotrophic pathogens; negative against P. syringae. 7,9,17
AtWRKY12 AT2G44745 Positively Suppressed expression during Pcc infiltration 7,8
AtWRKY22 AT4G01250 Positively Positive against P. syringae 11
OsWRKY62 Os09g25070 Positively Positive against M. oryzae and Xoo 18
AtRAP2.2 AT3G14230 Positively Positive against B. cinerea 8,19
AtRAP2.3 AT3G16770 Positively Positive against P. carotovorum 20,21
AtHRE1 AT1G72360 Positively Positive against Pst DC3000 6,22
AtHRE2 AT2G47520 Positively Positive against Pst DC3000 6,12,23
AtPRT6
HvPRT6
AT5G02310 Negatively
Negatively
Negative against Pst DC3000 and P. brassicae
Negative against Ps. japonica and Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei
6,13
6
AtNTAQ1 AT2G41760 Negatively Negative against Pst DC3000 6
AtATE1/2 AT5G05700
AT3G11240
Negatively Negative against P. brassicae 4,13
AtMYC2 AT1G32640 Positively Negative against B. cinerea
and P. cucumerina
24,25
AtMPK3/6 AT3G45640
AT2G43790
Induced expression Positive against Pto AvrRpt2 26,27
AtHUP26 AT3G10020 Induced expression Positive against Pst DC3000 28,29
AtPCO1 AT5G15120 Positively Induced expression 12,30
AtADH1 AT1G77120 Positively Negative against P. brassicae 13,31
AtPDC1/2 AT4G33070
AT5G54960
Positively Negative against P. brassicae 13
AtR8 Long Non-Coding RNA   Suppressed
expression
Negative against P. syringae 32

RAP2.2 positively participates in necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea response dependent on the ethylene (ET) signaling pathway in plant,8 phenotypic analyses revealed that RAP2.2-overexpression and rap2.2 plants showed less and more severely damaged after B. cinerea infection, respectively. While the overexpression of RAP2.12 did not enhance tolerance to the fungus.12 Our research7 proved that the WRKY33 and WRKY12 protein can up-regulate RAP2.2 by directly bind its promoter during submergence, moreover, RAP2.2 feedback up-regulate WRKY33 with the similar regulation way. This indicates that the pathogen resistance of RAP2.2 probably due to its interaction with WRKY33, which plays a key role in disease resistance and can regulate ethylene synthesis,33–35 rather than be a partner of Med25.36 RAP2.3 was demonstrated to interact with ORA5921, one of the best characterized ERF TFs involved in B. cinerea resistance, the lines overexpressing of RAP2.3 also showed resistance against pathogen while rap2.3 showed a hyposensitive phenotype.

The pentuple mutant erfVII lacks the entire Group VII ERF (HRE1 and HRE2 were included) showed increased susceptibility to sprayed Pst DC3000. HRE2 induction was also observed in Arabidopsis after infection with B. cinereal but not after treated with flg2212, suggesting that the induction is due to local hypoxia caused by O2 consumption by the living fungus. In our study,7 the expression of WRKY33 in hre1hre2 double mutant was much lower than in WT after submergence treatment, indicating the possible role for their regulation on WRKY33. By analyzing the resistance mechanism of the other ERF-VII members, the directly interplay with other defense key genes is required research in the future.

N-terminal cysteine oxidation of ERF-VII is enzymatically controlled by the PLANT CYSTEINE OXIDASES (PCOs) as part of the PRT6 N-degron pathway,4,30 the content of nitric oxide (NO) and O2 are key elements for their degradation. In hypoxia, not only NO and O2 changed in levels, but also some other gaseous compounds, such CO2,37 ethylene38,39 and H2S.40 They act a conserved role in transducing hypoxia response in plants and animals, as well as in influencing plant immune responses.6 Genes belonging to the N-degron pathway may thus provide a target for breeders to produce crops that increase disease resistance.6 For example, it is a common feature of pathogen induced tumor that activates of hypoxia responsive genes. In Homo sapiens, tumor hypoxia can be regulated by HIF (Hypoxia-Inducible Factor) pathway, which is similar with ERF-VII/N-degron pathway,41,42 the hypoxia therapy can target on HIF response by small-molecule inhibitors or medications1. Besides the oxygen-sensing N-degron pathway, the similarity of cellular hypoxia adaptations between the plants and animals is also remarkable,1,20 such as MAPK pathway,43 lipids,44,45 non-coding RNAs,32,46,47 and gaseous intracellular signal transducer.22,48 The H2S modulated PHD2/HIF-1α/MAPK signaling pathway to regulate tumor angiogenesis and cell injury;49,50 plant pathogenic bacteria Xylella fastidiosa and A.tumefaciens utilize biofilm growth-associated repressor (BigR) to control H2S detoxification under hypoxia.51 H2S can enhance NO-induced tolerance of hypoxia in maize.40 H2S biosynthetic enzyme (DES1) mediates a crosstalk between H2S, NO and ABA to control the stomatal closure.52 The erfVII mutants failed to close stomata in response to hemibiotroph pathogen Pst DC3000, but prt6-1 and ntaq1-3 did.6 It also shows the factors that can regulate or interact with key resistance-related genes are potentially involved in both defense and hypoxia responses, like HUP26 (HYPOXIA RESPONSE UNKNOWN PROTEIN 26),28 HUP29(PCO1),12 AtR8 Long Non-Coding RNA.32

Another study53 we recently reported revealed that the on-and-off module SR1-WRKY33-RAP2.2 is connected to the N-degron pathway to regulate submergence and reoxygenation responses in Arabidopsis. WRKY33 is phosphorylated by PA-MPK3/MPK6, WRKY33-P is simultaneously degraded by ubiquitin E3 ligase SR1 (SUBMERGENCE RESISTANT1) to regulate submergence response in Arabidopsis. However, there are still many questions needs to explore, such as how does SR1 sense oxygen levels to initialize the ubiquitination of WRKY33, and how is it removed when submergence ends? Is SR1 another oxygen sensor? In plant defense response, MAPK signaling could regulate the establishment of SAR (systemic acquired resistance) by regulatory loop consisting of WRKY33 and others.26 It added the connection and deep understanding between the two known oxygen signal pathways. And the on-and-off module is similarly with the “growth–defense trade-off” rule in plant for they both reflect the plant’s fast and appropriate responses to the changing environment. OsWRKY62 also was reported to play roles in the trade-off between defense and hypoxia responses by regulating different factors at a given time point.18

Future challenges

A single TF regulates different target genes depending on different environmental conditions, this is optimized for cultivation of crops under given conditions. Future research should aim to unravel more details about the crossing points genes between the signal pathways, especially the genes interaction between N-degron pathway and key resistance-related factors, and the research results in both plants and animals can give a hint to each other in disease resistance or breeding for compound stresses, then help to provide effective survival strategies for all of us.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the The National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870244].

Abbreviations

P. syringae

Pseudomonas syringae

Pcc

Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum

Pst DC3000

P. syringae pv tomato DC3000

MAPK

mitogen activated protein kinase

H2S

Hydrogen Sulfide

References

  • 1.Baik AH, Jain IH.. Turning the oxygen dial: balancing the highs and lows. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(7):1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Dongen JT, Licausi F.. Oxygen sensing and signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66(1):345–367. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(2):411–432. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gibbs DJ, Lee SC, Isa NM, Gramuglia S, Fukao T, Bassel GW, Correia CS, Corbineau F, Theodoulou FL, Bailey-Serres J, et al. Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants. Nature. 2011;479(7373):415–418. doi: 10.1038/nature10534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Licausi F, Kosmacz M, Weits DA, Giuntoli B, Giorgi FM, Voesenek LA, Perata P, van Dongen JT. Oxygen sensing in plants is mediated by an N-end rule pathway for protein destabilization. Nature. 2011;479(7373):419–422. doi: 10.1038/nature10536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vicente J, Mendiondo GM, Pauwels J, Pastor V, Izquierdo Y, Naumann C, Movahedi M, Rooney D, Gibbs DJ, Smart K, et al. Distinct branches of the N-end rule pathway modulate the plant immune response. New Phytol. 2019;221(2):988–1000. doi: 10.1111/nph.15387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tang H, Bi H, Liu B, Lou S, Song Y, Tong S, Chen N, Jiang Y, Liu J, Liu H, et al. WRKY33 interacts with WRKY12 protein to up-regulate RAP2. 2 during submergence induced hypoxia response in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2021;229(1):106–125. doi: 10.1111/nph.17020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao Y, Wei T, Yin K-Q, Chen Z, Gu H, Qu L-J, Qin G. Arabidopsis RAP2.2 plays an important role in plant resistance to Botrytis cinerea and ethylene responses. New Phytol. 2012;195(2):450–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04160.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zheng Z, Qamar SA, Chen Z, Mengiste T. Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. 2006;48(4):592–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim HS, Park YH, Nam H, Lee YM, Song K, Choi C, Ahn I, Park SR, Lee YH, Hwang DJ, et al. Overexpression of the Brassica rapa transcription factor WRKY12 results in reduced soft rot symptoms caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum in Arabidopsis and Chinese cabbage. Plant Biology (Stuttgart, Germany). 2014;16(5):973–981. doi: 10.1111/plb.12149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hsu FC, Chou MY, Chou SJ, Li YR, Peng HP, Shih MC. Submergence confers immunity mediated by the WRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(7):2699–2713. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Valeri MC, Novi G, Weits DA, Mensuali A, Perata P, Loreti E. Botrytis cinerea induces local hypoxia in Arabidopsis leaves. New Phytol. 2021;229(1):173–185. doi: 10.1111/nph.16513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gravot A, Richard G, Lime T, Lemarié S, Jubault M, Lariagon C, Lemoine J, Vicente J, Robert-Seilaniantz A, Holdsworth MJ, et al. Hypoxia response in Arabidopsis roots infected by Plasmodiophora brassicae supports the development of clubroot. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0941-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kerpen L, Niccolini L, Licausi F, van Dongen JT, Weits DA. Hypoxic conditions in crown galls induce plant anaerobic responses that support tumor proliferation. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:56. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chung H, Lee YH. Hypoxia: a Double-Edged sword during fungal pathogenesis? Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1920. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hsu FC, Shih MC. Plant defense after flooding. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8(11):e26922. doi: 10.4161/psb.26922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hwang JH, Lee MO, Choy Y-H, Y-m H-L, Hong CB, Lee D-H. Expression profile analysis of hypoxia responses in arabidopsis roots and shoots. Journal of Plant Biology. 2011;54(6):373–383. doi: 10.1007/s12374-011-9172-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fukushima S, Mori M, Sugano S, Takatsuji H. Transcription factor WRKY62 plays a role in pathogen defense and hypoxia-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57(12):2541–2551. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hinz M, Wilson IW, Yang J, Buerstenbinder K, Llewellyn D, Dennis ES, Sauter M, Dolferus R. Arabidopsis RAP2.2: an ethylene response transcription factor that is important for hypoxia survival. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):757–772. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.155077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim NY, Jang YJ, Park OK. AP2/ERF family transcription factors ORA59 and RAP2.3 interact in the nucleus and function together in ethylene responses. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1675. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Papdi C, Perez-Salamo I, Joseph MP, Giuntoli B, Bogre L, Koncz C, Szabados L. The low oxygen, oxidative and osmotic stress responses synergistically act through the ethylene response factor VII genes RAP2.12, RAP2.2 and RAP2.3. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. 2015;82(5):772–784. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zapol WM. Nitric oxide story. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(3):435–440. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Licausi F, van Dongen JT, Giuntoli B, Novi G, Santaniello A, Geigenberger P, Perata P. HRE1 and HRE2, two hypoxia-inducible ethylene response factors, affect anaerobic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology. 2010;62(2):302–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yuan LB, Dai YS, Xie LJ, Yu LJ, Zhou Y, Lai YX, Yang Y-C, Xu L, Chen Q-F, Xiao S, et al. Jasmonate regulates plant responses to postsubmergence reoxygenation through transcriptional activation of antioxidant synthesis. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(3):1864–1880. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lorenzo O, Chico JM, Sánchez-Serrano JJ, Solano R. JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 encodes a MYC transcription factor essential to discriminate between different jasmonate-regulated defense responses in Arabidopsis[W]. Plant Cell. 2004;16(7):1938–1950. doi: 10.1105/tpc.022319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Y, Schuck S, Wu J, Yang P, Doring AC, Zeier J, Tsuda K. A MPK3/6-WRKY33-ALD1-pipecolic acid regulatory loop contributes to systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 2018;30(10):2480–2494. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Singh P, Sinha AK. A positive feedback loop governed by SUB1A1 interaction with MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE3 imparts submergence tolerance in rice. Plant Cell. 2016;28(5):1127–1143. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.01001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huh S. New function of Hypoxia-responsive unknown protein in enhanced resistance to biotic stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;16(3):1868131. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1868131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mustroph A, Lee SC, Oosumi T, Zanetti ME, Yang H, Ma K, Yaghoubi-Masihi A, Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. Cross-kingdom comparison of transcriptomic adjustments to low-oxygen stress highlights conserved and plant-specific responses. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(3):1484–1500. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.151845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.White MD, Klecker M, Hopkinson RJ, Weits DA, Mueller C, Naumann C, O’Neill R, Wickens J, Yang J, Brooks-Bartlett JC, et al. Plant cysteine oxidases are dioxygenases that directly enable arginyl transferase-catalysed arginylation of N-end rule targets. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):14690. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shi H, Liu W, Yao Y, Wei Y, Chan Z. Alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (ADH1) confers both abiotic and biotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Science: An International Journal of Experimental Plant Biology. 2017;262:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li S, Nayar S, Jia H, Kapoor S, Wu J, Yukawa Y. The Arabidopsis hypoxia inducible AtR8 long non-coding RNA also contributes to plant defense and root elongation coordinating with WRKY genes under low levels of salicylic acid. Noncoding RNA. 2020;6(1):8. doi: 10.3390/ncrna6010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Birkenbihl RP, Diezel C, Somssich IE. Arabidopsis WRKY33 is a key transcriptional regulator of hormonal and metabolic responses toward botrytis cinerea infection. Plant Physiol. 2012;159(1):266–285. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li G, Meng X, Wang R, Mao G, Han L, Liu Y, Zhang S. Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(6):e1002767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Datta R, Kumar D, Sultana A, Hazra S, Bhattacharyya D, Chattopadhyay S. Glutathione regulates 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate synthase transcription via WRKY33 and 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate oxidase by modulating messenger RNA stability to induce ethylene synthesis during stress. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(4):2963–2981. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ou B, KQ Y, Sn L, Yang Y, Gu T, Wing HJM, Zhang L, Miao J, Kondou Y, Matsui M, et al. A high-throughput screening system for Arabidopsis transcription factors and its application to Med25-dependent transcriptional regulation. Mol Plant. 2011;4(3):546–555. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssr002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Voesenek LA, Bailey-Serres J. Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. New Phytol. 2015;206(1):57–73. doi: 10.1111/nph.13209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perata P. Ethylene signaling controls fast oxygen sensing in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(1):3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hartman S, Sasidharan R, Voesenek L. The role of ethylene in metabolic acclimations to low oxygen. New Phytol. 2021;229(1):64–70. doi: 10.1111/nph.16378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Peng R, Bian Z, Zhou L, Cheng W, Hai N, Yang C, Yang T, Wang X, Wang C. Hydrogen sulfide enhances nitric oxide-induced tolerance of hypoxia in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(11):2325–2340. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2037-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Licausi F, Giuntoli B, Perata P. Similar and yet different: oxygen sensing in animals and plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(1):6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Masson N, Keeley TP, Giuntoli B, White MD, Puerta ML, Perata P, Hopkinson RJ, Flashman E, Licausi F, Ratcliffe PJ, et al. Conserved N-terminal cysteine dioxygenases transduce responses to hypoxia in animals and plants. Science. 2019;365(6448):65–69. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nicolas S, Abdellatef S, Haddad MA, Fakhoury I, El-Sibai M. Hypoxia and EGF stimulation regulate VEGF expression in human Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) cells by differential regulation of the PI3K/Rho-GTPase and MAPK Pathways. Cells. 2019;8(11):8. doi: 10.3390/cells8111397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xie LJ, Zhou Y, Chen QF, Xiao S. New insights into the role of lipids in plant hypoxia responses. Prog Lipid Res. 2021;81:101072. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2020.101072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen J, Chen J, Fu H, Li Y, Wang L, Luo S, Lu H. Hypoxia exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via the HIF-2α/PPARα pathway. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;317(4):E710–e22. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00052.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhu T, Liu H, Su L, Xiong X, Wang J, Xiao Y, Zhu Y, Peng Y, Dawood A, Hu C, et al. MicroRNA-18b-5p downregulation favors mycobacterium tuberculosis clearance in macrophages via HIF-1α by promoting an inflammatory response. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2021;7(4):800–810. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tapeh B, Alivand M, Solalii S. Potential Interactions between miRNAs and Hypoxia: a new layer in cancer Hypoxia. Anti-Cancer agents in medicinal chemistry. 2021;21. doi: 10.2174/1871520621666210201100326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Banerjee A, Tripathi DK, Roychoudhury A. Hydrogen sulphide trapeze: environmental stress amelioration and phytohormone crosstalk. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry: PPB. 2018;132:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guan R, Wang J, Li D, Li Z, Liu H, Ding M, Cai Z, Liang X, Yang Q, Long Z, et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhibits cigarette smoke-induced inflammation and injury in alveolar epithelial cells by suppressing PHD2/HIF-1α/MAPK signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;81:105979. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang M, Yan J, Cao X, Hua P, Li Z. Hydrogen sulfide modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer via HIF-1α activation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;172:113775. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Npv DL, Pauletti BA, Marques AC, Perez CA, Caserta R, de Souza AA, Vercesi AE, Paes Leme AF, Benedetti CE. BigR is a sulfide sensor that regulates a sulfur transferase/dioxygenase required for aerobic respiration of plant bacteria under sulfide stress. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21974-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Scuffi D, Álvarez C, Laspina N, Gotor C, Lamattina L, García-Mata C. Hydrogen sulfide generated by l-Cysteine desulfhydrase acts upstream of nitric oxide to modulate abscisic acid-dependent stomatal closure. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(4):2065–2076. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.245373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu B, Jiang Y, Tang H, Tong S, Lou S, Shao C, Zhang J, Song Y, Chen N, Bi H, et al. The Ubiquitin E3 Ligase SR1 modulates the submergence response by degrading phosphorylated WRKY33 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2021. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES