Skip to main content
AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology logoLink to AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):721-9.

Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo.

A J Evans 1, D B Richardson 1, R Tien 1, J R MacFall 1, L W Hedlund 1, E R Heinz 1, O Boyko 1, H D Sostman 1
PMCID: PMC8333411  PMID: 8517365

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate with steady and pulsatile flow the influence of echo time, gradient strength and duration, and flow compensation on the degree of turbulent signal loss, factors that have been implicated in MR angiography's overestimation of the degree of stenosis.

METHODS

We examined poststenotic turbulent flow in two models, one that created a turbulent jet and another that simulated a plaque-like stenosis. The pulse sequence used in these experiments allowed for a single variable (flow compensation, echo time, or gradient strength) to be varied without changing the others.

RESULTS

Poststenotic signal loss can lead to overestimation of the degree of a stenosis. The area of signal loss in the turbulent jet was influenced by fractional echo and flow compensation, but not by echo time. We found that the dominant mechanism in poststenotic signal loss is related to the strength and duration of the imaging gradients.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow-compensated sequences with reduced gradient strength and duration will reduce poststenotic signal loss and may lead to more accurate estimations of the extent of stenotic lesions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.2 MB).


Articles from AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Neuroradiology

RESOURCES