Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0255404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255404

Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: A qualitative study

Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh 1,*, Meaza Demissie 2, Alemayehu Worku 3, Yemane Berhane 2
Editor: Kingston Rajiah4
PMCID: PMC8336848  PMID: 34347800

Abstract

Background

Continuum of care is an effective strategy to ensure that every woman receives a series of maternal health services continuously from early pregnancy to postpartum stages. The community perceptions regarding the use of maternal services across the continuum of care are essential for utilization of care in low-income settings but information in that regard is scanty. This study explored the community perceptions on the continuum of care for maternal health services in Ethiopia.

Methods

This study employed a phenomenological qualitative research approach. Four focus group discussions involving 26 participants and eight in-depth interviews were conducted with women who recently delivered, community health workers, and community leaders that were purposively selected for the study in West Gojjam zone, Amhara region. All the interviews and discussions were audio-taped; the records were transcribed verbatim. Data were coded and analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti software.

Results

We identified three primary themes: practice of maternal health services; factors influencing the decision to use maternal health services; and reasons for discontinuation across the continuum of maternal health services. The study showed that women faced multiple challenges to continuously uptake maternal health services. Late antenatal care booking was the main reasons for discontinuation of maternal health services across the continuum at the antepartum stage. Women’s negative experiences during care including poor quality of care, incompetent and unfriendly health providers, disrespectful care, high opportunity costs, difficulties in getting transportation, and timely referrals at healthcare facilities, particularly at health centers affect utilization of maternal health services across the continuum of care. In addition to the reverberation effect of the intrapartum care factors, the major reasons mentioned for discontinuation at the postpartum stage were lack of awareness about postnatal care and service delivery modality where women are not scheduled for postpartum consultations.

Conclusion

This study showed that rural mothers still face multiple challenges to utilize maternal health services as recommended by the national guidelines. Negative experiences women encountered in health facilities, community perceptions about postnatal care services as well as challenges related to service access and opportunity costs remained fundamental to be reasons for discontinuation across the continuum pathways.

Background

Maternal and newborn health is a major public health problem in low-income countries. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is the only region with unacceptably high maternal mortality ratio, accounted for about two-thirds of global maternal deaths in 2017 [1]. Though Ethiopia achieved a substantial reduction in maternal death of roughly 61% between 2000–2017 [1], its maternal mortalities are still among the highest in the world [13] and persistently high neonatal mortality since the last two decades [46]. The utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services across the continuum remains low in SSA [79]. The uptake of services drastically declined from antenatal to the postnatal period, along with the CoC [10] where coverage is lowest during childbirth and postnatal period, and services are often fragmented and weakly implemented, limiting continuity of care [11].

Communities’ perceptions about health programs and health services greatly affect the uptake of recommended maternal health services in low-income settings [1214]. The Andersen and Newman behavioral model for health service utilization provides a framework to describe factors that influence individual decisions to use health care services. Accordingly, the utilization of maternal health across the continuum of care (CoC) is a function of characteristics of the health system, individual characteristics, and interaction of individual and societal determinants [12].

The main health system factors that have contributed to the failure to deliver effective maternal health interventions are shortage of trained staff, poor quality of care, delayed use of services and low demand for care, erratic supply of essential drugs and supplies, and institutional segmentation of the health system, and inadequate operational management [11, 15]. The quality of antepartum and intrapartum care influences women’s intention towards having follow-up visits and practicing key postpartum maternal health behaviors [16].

Individual determinants of health services utilization are a function of their predisposition to use of services, factors which enable or impede use, and their need for care [12]. Different literature shows maternal care utilization is influenced by various perceived barriers including socio-cultural, economic and physical accessibility, and perceived benefit/need factors [13, 17]. Recent studies in Ethiopia show, continued use of services varied significantly across wealth, antenatal care (ANC) visits in the first trimester, quality of ANC, and mode of delivery across the CoC [18, 19]. The need for a continuum of maternal health care can also be affected by the intrapartum and postpartum complications or duration and severity of disabilities encountered, individual past experiences with pregnancy, childbirth and health services, self-perceived health status, and perceived quality of care [17].

Evidence shows that individual supply-side factors alone do not fully explain the variability in women’s ability to use maternal health care [20]. Social norms—informal rules of behavior that dictate what is acceptable within a given social context—influence health-related choices and behaviors of people [21, 22]. In low-income settings, religious beliefs, social norms about pregnancy and childbirth care, values and opinions of other family and community members, and the need to seek permission from husbands and other family members significantly influence women’s decision to seek care [2326]. As a result of gendered social norms, in some societies, women’s autonomy and decision-making power to access to and control over resources and negotiation power with her partner and family are limited that restricts their ability to make decisions with regards to maternal health and health care [2730].

In low-income countries, community engagement strategies and community health worker programs are used to improve access and utilization of health care services through bridging families, communities, and health facilities [31]. Ethiopia has employed different community engagement approaches for decades. The Health Extension Program (HEP), launched in 2004, is an institutionalized community health system that engages communities to identify their priorities and solve their health problems [32]. Evidence shows that HEP has contributed to improving community access to health services and it has been associated with increases in the uptake of maternal health services [3335]. Nonetheless, the utilization of maternal healthcare services across the continuum of maternal health care remains low [8]. Further analysis of the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2016 showed that 45%, 47%, and 87% of women who booked for antenatal care visits dropped from a recommended number of ANC, institutional delivery, and postnatal care (PNC) visits, respectively [36].

Undue considerations of the role of community perceptions and negative experiences in planning and implementation of maternal health services contribute to poor maternal healthcare uptake in rural communities [24, 29, 37]. This is mainly due to lack of adequate evidence and comprehensive understanding of the communities’ perceptions and experiences of maternal health care. In Ethiopia, although there are few studies on factors associated with the adherence to the continuum of maternal health care, community perceptions regarding the use of maternal services across the continuum of care are not well documented. As such, this study explored the community perceptions on the continuum of care for maternal health services in Ethiopia for a deeper understanding of women’s experiences and challenges regarding the use of skilled care at antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum stages. Therefore, understanding community perceptions of health and experiences of care can serve as an evidence base for community-based maternal health initiatives.

Methods

Settings

The Ethiopian health system is structured into primary level care, secondary level care, and tertiary level care. The primary care structure found in a woreda (i.e., district) health system comprises a primary hospital, 4–5 health centers, and 20–25 health posts for the delivery of basic curative, preventive and promotive community and outreach services with a seamless continuum.

Ethiopia has employed different community engagement approaches for decades through the use of voluntary community health workers with various names and scopes of practice including community health agents, community-based reproductive health workers, community health promoters or volunteers, and traditional birth attendants. Since 2004, the country has expanded community health services through the expansion of the HEP and actively engaging community volunteers to reach most communities and households [32]. In 2011, the community engagement has restructured and introduced the Women Development Army (WDA) strategy to further strengthen the HEP, and participation of individuals, families, and communities. Under the WDA strategy, women are organized and mobilized in groups to share actionable messages and influence each other to adopt and practice healthy behaviors [38].

Women development groups support Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in promoting key messages related to skilled maternal health care through social events such as coffee ceremonies, using peers during marketing, and other community events. They identify pregnant women and birth in their communities and link them to HEWs for early ANC and PNC care.

The study was conducted in five rural woredas namely Burie Zuria, Dembecha, Jabi Tehnan, Quarit, and Womberima in West Gojjam Zone of Amhara region. The zone and districts were purposely selected based on the feasibility of establishing sampling frame as this zone has only five The Last Ten Kilometers (L10K) Project woredas while other L10K zones have 10 woredas, and availability of the established relationship with the zone and woredas which allowed practical feasibility to do the data collection. This helped the researchers to minimize difficulties and expenses involved in the planning and conduct of data collection.

Design and population

We utilized a phenomenological qualitative research approach. Based on the Andersen and Newman Framework for health services utilization model [12], we hypothesized that the continuous uptake of maternal care is influenced by the women’s and communities’ perceptions and previous experiences of care, women’s exposure to the health system at any stage of the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum stages, and health service and program-related factors. Accordingly, guided by this model, mothers’ and community’s experiences and perspectives regarding maternal health services were captured through in-depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to answer the research questions in detail that is to gain individual and group/community perceptions and experiences regarding maternal health services.

Three different groups of participants were selected to gain as much insight and understanding as possible about maternal health care services from the community’s perspectives. It is composed of women 15–49 years of age who have given birth in the last year before the date of data collection, community elders and community and religious leaders (all were males and hereafter referred to as community and religious leaders), and community volunteers (i.e. WDAs).

Sampling methods

Maximum variation sampling schemes were used to yield a wider perspective from various groups of stakeholders. We subdivided the woredas (i.e. districts) into better performing and low performing strata in terms of maternal health service utilization based on routine administrative data obtained from the zonal health department. Accordingly, two of the study woredas were classified as better-performing, and the other three as low-performing woredas. In each woreda, kebeles, the smallest administrative unit, were selected based on the feasibility of convening FGD participants and availability of HEWs in the Kebele. Lastly, from each kebele, study participants were recruited with the assistance of HEWs based on pre-set selection criteria that include having lived experiences of maternal health services, being recognized as influential and motivator of maternal health service uptake in the community, and being a community volunteer or WDA.

Fig 1 presents the detailed sampling frame and respondents’ categories.

Fig 1. Sampling frame for the qualitative study.

Fig 1

The principal investigator and research assistants collected and analyzed informational redundancy, data saturation, after conducting three FGDs and six IDIs [39].

Data collection

Data were collected in October-November 2019. Two research assistants who had experience in qualitative research along with the principal investigator collected the data.

Interview and FGD guides were prepared with open-ended questions with probing questions (S1 and S2 Appendices) were used to capture the required information from study participants. The interview and discussion guides were prepared in English and translated to Amharic, the local language. The main topics of discussion included community perceptions about maternal health programs and health providers; the practice and experiences of antepartum care, facility delivery, and postpartum services; and reasons for discontinuation across the continuum of maternal health care. Then, follow-up questions were asked to help to explore their perceptions and experiences of receiving maternal health services in detail. Interviews and group discussions were conducted at a convenient place in the community.

Focus group discussions were used to explore information about the social context and discussed the differences among participants. The size of the FGD ranged from 6–8 participants to elicit group-level perceptions by facilitating active interaction. The FGD sessions lasted between 49 and 99 minutes (discussions with WDAs lasted longer which might be due to their lived experience as a mother as well as their engagement in promoting maternal health messages as a community volunteer).

Individual interviews were conducted with recently delivered mothers, WDAs, and community and religious leaders to investigate personal perspectives; some private issues, for instance, delivery experience; issues that were raised during FGD that needs further investigation; and to identify opportunities for improving maternal health services. Interview sessions lasted between 21 and 43 minutes.

The principal investigator ensured the quality of the data by conducting regular reflective discussions with the research assistants. These discussions were held between the interviews or discussion sessions to discuss key findings, refine the FGD and IDI guides, and identify strategies that continually enhance the line of inquiry following the tradition of emergent design in qualitative research. Throughout the data collection, the study participants were probed to elaborate on or clarify what they have said during the interviews or group discussions to confirm the accuracy of the information captured and the meanings that the participants intended to ascribe to.

Throughout the data collection and archive, we ensured confidentiality of the data. Individual personal identifiers were not collected and authors did not have access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection.

Data analysis

All interviews and discussions were audio-taped with the consent of the study participants and the records were transcribed verbatim by the principal investigator and the research assistants. The principal investigator listened to the audio records and read through the transcripts several times to have an overall sense of the data and to organize the transcripts.

The transcript texts were exported to ATLAS.ti software for analysis. A transcript analysis approach was employed which involved familiarization, coding and categorizing data, identifying themes and interpretation stages. Both deductive and inductive coding approach was applied. Guided by the conceptual framework and interview and discussion guides, pre-defined initial codes were developed (open coding) before data collection. Then, each code was further analyzed and disaggregated into categories and sub-themes (deductive axial coding). Iteratively, through reading the data, all data were subsequently classified into one of the codes. Additional codes were added while reading the data, categories, and sub-categories that had not been previously identified (inductive approach). Data were triangulated from responses obtained from IDIs and FGDs to compare them with responses from the different community groups.

The categories and the concepts that emerged from interviews and discussions were verified by consistently linking the emerging categories with the data received from the other groups of informants to improve the trustworthiness of the qualitative data analysis. Quotes were used to enhance credibility and substantiate the narrative with participants’ own words.

Reports of quotations for selected codes were generated in ATLAS.ti software. Themes and patterns of interrelationships between the themes were identified and reported.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research and Community Service Office of the University of Gondar (reference number V/P/RCS/05/2505/2019; dated on 25 August 2019). The objectives, methodology, purpose of the study, and the benefits and risks of the study were explained to all study participants. Before data collection, participants were also informed of their right to voluntarily participate in the study. Verbal consent was sought and documented before conducting any interviews and discussions. Because the majority of the respondents were not expected to be able to read or write; written consent was not sought. If the respondent agreed to be interviewed after listening to the consent statement, the interviewer marked the consent form as consent given below the consent statement and signed below that. The interviewer continued with the interview only after receiving and documenting consent. The survey protocol submitted to the ethical review committee included the study questionnaire with the statement that described the consent-obtaining procedure. The primary investigator oriented data collectors on ethical and methodological issues and supervisors followed them throughout the data collection period to monitor any ethical breach.

To ensure the privacy of study participants, respondents were interviewed in a conducive environment; and confidentiality of the data were guaranteed by preserving the anonymity of the study participants. Individual personal identifiers were not collected, to ensure the anonymity of data and the researcher would keep the information obtained from the research participant in private or will withhold information from others, to respect the confidentiality and privacy of study participants. Identifying information (names and addresses) was not included in the data collection instrument.

Results

Study participants

A total of four FGDs involving 26 participants and 8 IDIs were conducted: 3 IDIs with delivered mothers; 2 IDIs with community health volunteers/ WDAs; and 3 IDIS with the community and religious leaders.

Participants in FGDs included 12 recently delivered mothers, 6 WDAs, and 8 community and religious leaders. The mean age of mothers was 27 years raged from 20–34 years. Most mothers were illiterate but few completed 4–10 grades. While the mean age of WDAs was 47 years ranged from 42–55 years. They serve for a median of 6 years as a community volunteer. On the other hand, the mean age of community and religious leaders were 52 years ranged from 41–72 years.

Key findings

We identified three primary themes including views on and practice of maternal health services; factors influencing the decision to use maternal health services across the continuum of care; and reasons for discontinuation across the continuum of care for maternal health services. Under each thematic area, several categories were identified (Table 1).

Table 1. Major themes and categories identified.

Themes Categories
Views on and practice of maternal health services
  • Uptake of maternal health services across the continuum

  • Timing and frequency of visit

  • Experiences of care

Factors influencing decision to use maternal health services across the continuum
  • Health promotion activities

  • Fear of obstetric danger signs and previous experiences of complications

  • Community support

Reasons for discontinuation across the continuum of maternal health services
  • Late ANC care-seeking

  • Perception and fear of overgrowth of the fetus

  • Perceived poor quality of care

  • Disrespectful care

  • Lack of trust in the competence of providers

  • Service inaccessibility

  • High opportunity cost

  • Lack of understanding about PNC services

  • Lack of PNC service or schedule at health facilities

Views on and practice of maternal health services across the continuum

Perceived need and uptake of maternal health services across the continuum of care

According to informants, nowadays, most women utilize ANC, facility delivery, infant vaccination, and postpartum family planning services. They mentioned that the situation has now changed due to the provision of health education by health workers, the establishment of health centers in their vicinity, the presence of HEWs, and other similar efforts.

Nowadays, no pregnant women stay home without having ANC; all are aware of the importance [of ANC consultations].”

(recently delivered mother, FGD).

Most participants mentioned the benefit of receiving skilled care during pregnancy and childbirth. They acknowledged the risk of complications and the risk of death associated with pregnancy and childbirth. However, there is no formal PNC service for both the mother and the newborn. After delivery, women seek care only if they are sick, otherwise, they would only seek vaccination and family planning services after 45 days postpartum. A recently delivered woman affirmed this, “No, we just stay home, we do not go if we are not sick. (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Timing and frequency of ANC visit

According to the respondents, most women started booking ANC at or about 3 months or later when they would be certain about the continuity of their pregnancy or when they felt ill-health. One of the community leaders said, “In about third month of their pregnancy, the majority of pregnant women … would go for pregnancy screening and start pregnancy follow-up. (community leader, FGD) Culturally, women did not believe that one can be certain about the continuity of their pregnancy before three months. It is believed that the pregnancy might end in miscarriage if revealed in the earlier periods. Thus, there is a taboo to disclosing pregnancy.

I think they do not believe their pregnancy could continue and some of them do not want to disclose their pregnancy before three months for fear of miscarriage.”

(WDA, IDI)

Pregnancy with unknown last menstrual period (LMP) could be the reason for delayed booking for ANC, “Probably, they may not know their LMP; they started booking after they received a pregnancy test at the health center. That is why they elapsed one or two months to start ANC booking. (WDA, IDI) Moreover, according to the accounts of respondents, family planning methods women used might cause an absence of menstrual period and this might mislead women, becoming a reason for them not to go and test for pregnancy and thus the reason for not start their ANC early.

Regarding the frequency of visits, usually, women receive about 4 ANC visits. Study participants mentioned that some mothers might not receive the recommended number of ANC consultations due to late booking and perceived fear of overgrowth of the fetus. A community volunteer said, “If she feels sick, she would visit the health center before her scheduled visit and thus may end up visiting the facility four or five times. However, if she is not sick, she would visit four times. (WDA, IDI).

Experiences of care

Most study participants appreciated the services they received from health professionals at hospitals, health centers, and health posts. They mentioned that “The health center and health professionals are compliant and willing to serve the community. (community leader, IDI) Besides, respondents witnessed that they have trust in facility care. A community volunteer said, “We rely on health facility care. We feel that no death occurs there. (WDA, IDI) However, some respondents mentioned that they experienced negative interactions with providers, delays in care and service provision, and delay in referral to the next level of care, particularly during intrapartum care at the health center level.

Negative interactions with providers. Some study participants mentioned that they have experienced negative interactions with providers including abusive care from providers, guards, and ambulance drivers and discrimination based on their socioeconomic status. Community leaders who were participants of FGD said that some facility staff behavior and approach towards clients is not good at all. The mother expressed her experience, “while I was vomiting, she [the provider] insulted and pushed me to come down [from the coach]. (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Delays in service provision and referral. Despite the high perceived need for maternal services across the continuum of care, respondents mentioned that mothers also experienced delays in getting care at the facilities and referral to the next level of care. Discussions with the study participants also indicated that the delay in care provision resulted in poor interaction with providers. One of the participants expressed her concerns, regarding such experiences she observed, as follows,

… the health professionals usually play cards while a pregnant woman is screaming and suffering from labor pain instead of monitoring her. When we ask them to refer her to other health facilities if they cannot do anything to help her, they become belligerent and tell us to leave and take her away if we want to. No one follows her to see if she is bleeding or not or had lost fluid [amniotic fluid] early because they do not monitor her status regularly.”

(WDA, FGD)

Respondents also experienced poor quality of the delivery services at the health center. “The health center does not give us sufficient attention and follow-up. (recently delivered mother, FGD). Accordingly, women preferred to go to the hospital or deliver at home.

…. Many women do not want to give birth in this health center and prefer to be referred to a nearby hospital.”

(recently delivered mother, FGD)

The FGD participants claimed that they had experienced delays in the referral process while being referred from the first-level health facilities to higher-level facilities. Respondents claimed that the health center staff did not initiate timely referrals.

Factors influencing decision to use maternal health services across the continuum

Based on participants’ opinions, health promotion activities, previous experiences, and community support facilitate the use of skilled maternal health care across the continuum.

Health promotion activities

The health services provided by community health workers and health professionals influenced women to utilize maternal health services.

Previously, before the introduction of the ANC service, pregnant women used to give birth in their homes and made no ANC check-up; some died and others survived by chance in the process. However, after the introduction of ANC service and the education we got from the HEWs, we can identify pregnant women early … and convenience them to go and start pregnancy follow-up.”

(WDA, FGD)

Fear of obstetric danger signs and previous experiences of complications

Previous experience of obstetric problems and complications and fear of happening again influenced women to utilize maternal health services continuously.

My wife did not like going to the health center for follow-up care. In her first pregnancy, she almost died because the fetus appeared upside-down [breech presentation] during labor; the fetus died. We learned from that experience and in the second pregnancy she attended ANC, the fetus presented same way as before, breech, the health facility referred her to hospital on time and she gave birth safely.”

(community leader, FGD)

Another FGD participant supported the above comment as follows, “My wife had experienced severe bleeding after delivery during her previous pregnancies. In her last pregnancy, I took her to the facility. (community leader, FGD).

Community support

Respondents described that communities, particularly their neighbors, provided support to the women in managing household chores during pregnancy and childbirth. They take care of the children, manage household assets and activities such as cultural ceremonies. The community played a facilitative role in laboring women by calling for ambulance services and informing HEWs. Furthermore, they also indicated that the communities transported the women to an ambulance access point or health facility and again back to their homes, particularly in circumstances when there was no access to ambulance services. “If the village is far, the community will take her [the pregnant woman] on a locally made carrier. (WDA, FGD).

Reasons for discontinuation across the continuum

Late ANC booking and fear of the overgrowth of the baby were mentioned as reasons for discontinuation of maternal health services at the antepartum stage. On the one hand, multiple reasons were mentioned for discontinuation at the intrapartum stage that includes: poor quality care, incompetency of providers, disrespectful care, inaccessibility to service, and high opportunity costs. On the other hand, in addition to the reverberation effect of the intrapartum care factors, the major reasons for discontinuation at the postpartum stage were lack of awareness about PNC care and lack of PNC service or inconvenience of the schedule at health facilities.

Late ANC booking

Those mothers who booked ANC at a later trimester of their pregnancy might get less than four ANC visits and may not complete the recommended antepartum services. “…for instance, a woman in our locality did not realize she was pregnant until the fourth or fifth month of her pregnancy. This delayed her ANC follow-up and a few months later she was in labor.” (WDA, FGD) In line with this, study participants also mentioned that women’s physical strength in the last trimester of their pregnancy which makes it difficult to travel on foot long distances to seek care is one of the reasons for discontinuation of antepartum care.

Perception and fear of overgrowth of the fetus

Women’s perception and fear of overgrowth of the fetus when women received frequent antepartum care, influenced some women to discontinue their antepartum follow-up. Participants affirmed that some women believed that frequent ANC check-ups would result in overgrowth of the fetus that in turn would result in prolonged labor as the following quote demonstrates. “There are some women who stopped their ANC follow-up for fear of fetal overgrowth and later prolonged labor as a result. (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Perceived poor quality of care

There is a reverberation effect of perceived poor service provision on the uptake of maternal health services across the continuum. The experience and perception of receiving poor quality service at health facilities during the antepartum visits for some and for others who received poor intrapartum care deterred women from continuing to use skilled delivery from the health facility. The study participants mentioned that women do not receive appropriate support from health facilities and had encountered problems during labor and delivery. As a result, they preferred to give birth at home rather than at health facilities.

…most would ask why they should go to deliver at the health center, for there is little the health center would do to help them. Most make their ANC follow-ups but when it’s time to give birth, they try to seek assistance from TBAs since they are not satisfied with the service at the health center.”

(recently delivered mother, FGD)

Delays in care and service provision particularly during labor and delivery in health facilities have created disappointments for women and the community. It was indicated that participants experienced delays in receiving maternal health care services from health facilities due to the unavailability as well as negligence of health workers.

…during her labor, there was a delay and when we asked him if he was waiting until she dies, he replied with arrogance telling us to wait, anyway. The mother in labor was very uncomfortable and told us to stop saying anything. Finally, she was able to deliver with the help of St. Mary and she made it back home.”

(WDA, FGD)

Disrespectful care

Some women avoided accessing maternal health services due to abusive behavior, discriminatory attitude of health professionals, non-compassionate care as well as lack of autonomy. Community leaders who were participants of FGD said that some facility staff behavior and approach towards clients is not good at all. They said that the staff are arrogant and commented saying this should be corrected.

One day, I took my wife who was in labor to a health facility. The health provider on-duty shouted at me that "she is not in her term and labor" and pushed me out. She stayed in the delivery room and I was waiting outside far away from the delivery room, after a while he called me to come into the delivery room since my wife had to deliver.”

(community leader, FGD)

Lack of supportive and compassionate care during labor and delivery was a major problem mentioned by the mothers as a reason for not attending skilled care. An FGD participant, a woman who recently delivered said, “Most women question what would the health professionals do for them during their labor other than sitting outside and giving them no attention. Some women remain home during their labor for these reasons.” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Study participant women mentioned that “The health professionals care better for the people coming from urban areas and not for us who come from the rural areas to whom they give poor consideration. (recently delivered mother, FGD). They added that They give more attention when they see educated people and not to us, the rural dwellers. Some pregnant women remain home during their labor because of this. (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Delivery positions, exposing their genitalia, and vaginal examination are disliked by most women. “One of the main reasons for the dislike of institutional delivery is the position and vaginal exam. The vaginal exam is a very painful and disgusting experience. (recently delivered mother, FGD) They mentioned these are the main reasons that frighten others from coming to the facility to deliver. A community leader expressed the community opinions by saying, “There are women who give birth at home without disclosing their pregnancy. It is all about privacy. The issue is not distance or cost. (community leader, IDI) The vaginal examination and lithotomy position affect other mothers who had no previous experience of the examination. This is how it was described by a woman who recently delivered. “We fear the vaginal examination. Mothers who heard of examination by health workers inserting their hands get afraid and decide not to attend facility delivery.” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Lack of trust in the competence of providers

This study showed that mothers are dissatisfied with the intrapartum care provided at the health center level. Accordingly, they were inclined to give birth at home.

Women may go to the health center to give birth because it is mandatory, but most would ask why they go to the health facility as there is very little the health center does to help them. Therefore, most make their ANC follow-ups but at the time of delivery they opt for TBAs.”

(recently delivered mother, FGD)

Women specifically mentioned skill deficiency regarding misdiagnosis and mismanagement of obstetric complications as well as identifying twin pregnancy and fetal presentation. The competence of care providers regarding obstetric care was found to be a major reason for women to discontinue maternity care and instead opted to give birth at home. The lack of confidence in skilled birth attendants was expressed by women as follows:

At the health center, I was told my pregnancy was fine the whole time, they did not notice the presence of twins. … but I was aware and knew my status because of my previous experience. After I arrived at the hospital, being referred, they told me that I was having twins.”

(recently delivered mother, FGD)

Some women perceived that the midwifery skills for obstetric care at health centers were limited compared to those at hospitals. For this reason, they tended not to utilize maternal health services at health centers.

Some women say the health center is not up to the level to help them deliver and as a result, the women visit other health facilities.”

(recently delivered mother, FGD)

Service inaccessibility

Distance to the health facility, poor road conditions, and inadequate transportation were commonly cited as reasons for not utilizing maternal health services continuously. Access to ambulance service, particularly during the night time, was very challenging. “Ambulance service is almost nil. We have to carry the laboring women to the bus stop or facility.” (community leader, FGD). Mothers who participated in the FGD added that “…. On one occasion, we could not find an ambulance and finally, we tried to take her ourselves to health facility but she delivered on the way. (community leader, FGD).

Distance to the health facility and poor road conditions particularly during the rainy seasons were major barriers to seek skilled care for some women in certain distant communities. Community and religious leaders described the situation as follows,

The river in between the kebele and the health center is the biggest challenge for us. It is impossible to cross the river from June to September and during this time no one has access to service provided at the health centers. Previously there was a temporary bridge, but it was damaged by seasonal flooding due to heavy rains. Thus, pregnant women suffer a lot. For example, in the last rainy season (June to September 2019) four laboring women died [in this village].”

(community leader, FGD)

High opportunity cost

Though participants acknowledged the free maternity care services, there are high opportunity costs involved for maternity service utilization that hinder mothers from seeking intrapartum care. Opportunity costs including transport costs for returning home, food costs for accompanies, and medical costs. These are some of the barriers that hinder mothers from seeking intrapartum care. Focus group discussions among community and religious leaders revealed that if women become critically ill and feel they are going to die; they would not take them to the facility for fear of the cost of transport back home.

The other problem is the ambulance which does not provide round trip service and we have no other means of transportation to get back home. This is a big challenge for us. Especially some community members do not take critically ill women (pregnant or laboring) to the health facility, because if she dies at the health center or hospital returning the dead body will be too expensive, about 3,000–4,000 birr—[equivalent to USD 102–136].”

(community leader, FGD)

Ambulance service is not easily accessible for facility delivery. Moreover, there is no transportation service provided to return home which is a big problem for the community. Some contract transport by paying up to 100 birr—[~ USD 3.4], “… they do not return us home, and we spend 100 birr for Bajaj transportation to return home. (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Others traveled long distances carrying the mother and newborn; relatives/neighbors help. Accordingly, the refreshment fee (round the trip) for people carrying the woman is another cost involved for facility birth. In case of a referral from a health center to a hospital, the ambulance allows two people to accompany the woman. Other relatives/neighbors use public transport to accompany her.

Up to two people will be allowed into the ambulance while transporting the woman to the health center during her labor. The rest who accompany her will have to use their means of transport by covering their cost. The woman covers her own cost for transportation when she returns home after delivery.”

(WDA, FGD)

All discussants and informants acknowledged the medical cost or cost of maternity services being free. But for prescriptions, they would pay out of their pocket, and reimbursement for their health insurance is difficult.

Regarding reimbursement for an outside health facility prescription fee, they responded that reimbursement is done at the woreda office, not at the health center and it is too far from the health center which is too difficult for us".

(community leader, FGD)

Lack of understanding about PNC services

Most participants described that they are not receiving follow-up service after delivery. Unless it is for the baby’s vaccination we do not make PNC for us. We go to the health center for the baby’s vaccination 45 days after birth.” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Some study participants argued that postnatal care is required only if they experience illness or complications. Participant women who recently delivered said, “It’s because we have no illnesses. Why would we go if we do not have any pain!? (recently delivered mother, FGD). Community volunteers also affirmed this, ‘‘Mothers do not believe postpartum is necessary. (WDA, IDI).

Most participants do not know about postpartum services. They described postnatal care as just being for immunization service or family planning services which they received at or after 45 days of postpartum. ‘‘We went on the 45th day as per our appointment. For what purpose do we need to go before that?” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Lack of PNC service or schedule

Most women mentioned that they were not informed about postpartum visits to the facility. Mothers in the FGD said, ‘‘We have not been told by the health center that there is PNC service for us, only vaccination for the baby. (recently delivered mother, FGD) Health providers advised them to return for child vaccination 45 days after delivery. ‘‘They told us to come back on the 45th day for vaccination and family planning. … we went on the date of appointment. (recently delivered mother, FGD) “After 45 days, however, they visit the health facility to get family planning services for them and vaccination services for their babies. (WDA, IDI).

Discussion

This study explores community’s perceptions and experiences about the continuum of care for maternal health services; factors influencing the decision to use maternal health services across the continuum; and reasons for discontinuation across the continuum of maternal health services in rural Ethiopia. The findings show that though communities have positive attitudes and good practices regarding continuous use of skilled antenatal and delivery care, most women dropped receiving care at the postpartum stage. Besides, some respondents experienced negative interactions with providers, delays in care and service provision, and delay in referral to the next level of care, particularly during intrapartum care at the health center level. Our results also demonstrate that communities’ perceive fear of obstetric danger signs and previous experiences of complications, health promotion activities, and community support were influencing the decision to use maternal health services across the continuum. Regarding reasons for discontinuation, communities perceive a wide range of factors that contribute to the discontinuation across the continuum of time dimensions in Ethiopia. Late ANC booking, fear of overgrowth of the baby and thereby fear of prolonged labor were the main reasons for the discontinuation of maternal health services across the life course continuum at the antepartum stage. Perceived reasons identified, in this study, as factors for women’s fragmented use of maternity care at the intrapartum stage and giving birth at home include perceived poor quality of care, disrespectful childbirth care, perceived limited obstetric competence of providers, lack of healthcare access, and high opportunity costs. In addition to the reverberation effect of intrapartum care factors, the major perceived reasons mentioned for discontinuation at the postpartum stage were lack of awareness about PNC and service delivery modality where women were not scheduled for postpartum consultations.

Most communities in the study area had positive attitudes as well as practices of antenatal care and facility delivery which is in line with recent national demographic and health survey findings in Ethiopia where about three-fourths of women had at least one ANC visit with a skilled provider and over the last decade, i.e., between 2011 and 2019, the institutional delivery levels showed a five-fold increase [40]. This study also identifies health promotion activities and community support were positively influencing the decision to use maternal health services across the continuum. This indicates the importance of strengthening the implementation of community-based health promotion and education interventions, engaging communities, and for sustained behavior to improve utilization of maternal health services.

Late ANC booking for consultation is an important factor for discontinuation of maternal health services across the continuum. This is in line with previous studies documenting women who book their ANC care when in their later trimester, would receive fewer ANC visits that result in discontinuation of subsequent maternal health services across the continuum pathway [7, 19, 41].

Perceived poor quality of maternity care has an echo effect on the uptake of maternal health services across the continuum. The experience of receiving poor quality service during the antepartum visits or poor intrapartum care deterred women from continuing to use skilled delivery from the health facility. Due to the poor quality of health center level obstetric care, some communities prefer traveling directly to hospitals or to be referred to one. Due to perceived delay of care and referral, clients usually request timely care or timely referral. Referral requests made by clients result in poor interaction with the health center staff which is linked with the abandonment of care and perceived poor competence of providers. This also shows that the community sometimes considers the quality of care more than the opportunity cost which is incurred by traveling long distances to hospitals. However, as they indicated, when a referral is initiated late and the family feels that the woman is too tired, they would decline the referral and travel back home fearing the opportunity costs that would be incurred in transporting (what they believe would be) a dead body. Previous studies also documented poor quality of primary care limits the utilization of continuous maternal health services [11, 13, 15]. Therefore, service providers and program managers need to closely monitor the maternity services delivered at the primary level of care to improve the quality of care and client-provider interaction.

The findings of this study identified disrespectful maternity care as a major barrier to women’s continuous use of primary health care facilities, especially for childbirth. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth, discrimination based on socio-economic status, and poor client-provider interaction, influence the use of maternal health services across the continuum. Unduly exposure of women’s reproductive organs, lack of privacy, and repeated and painful vaginal examination practices were also found to be other barriers for the continuum of care. According to women who participated in this study, this has a reverberation effect that deters mothers from attending facility birth. This theme is linked to the poor quality of care provided as well as distrust in the competence of providers. Previous studies in Ethiopia [42, 43] and elsewhere [44, 45] demonstrate that women experienced various forms of mistreatment in health facilities. The Ethiopian health system recognizes compassionate, patient-centered care as a priority in the efforts to improve quality and equity in service delivery, as noted in its Health Sector Transformation Plan [32]. However, much effort has not been made in improving the traditional client-provider relationships where the clinician has a paternal role to ensure women’s autonomy and women-centered care. As such, it is important to give attention to strategies that address the mistreatment of childbirth regarding health workers’ polite communication with clients and preserving the privacy of women as well as improving health workers’ work environment.

This finding highlights that lack of trust in the obstetric skills of health center level providers is another major factor that deters women from utilizing maternal health services continually. Previous studies in Cambodia [46] and Ghana [44] also documented that some women did not have confidence in the abilities of skilled birth attendants at health center level which usually influences birthplace decision-making of mothers [44, 45]. The National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care assessment reports low knowledge score of health care providers regarding obstetric complications [47]. As such, this calls for prompt action to enhance obstetric skills of providers at the health center level and facilitate community-facility interface meetings to building the trust of women and communities in the health system.

Despite the expansion of primary health care, provision of free maternal health services, and free ambulance transport service from home to facilities (to ensure universal access to primary health care [32]), inaccessibility of health care service due to distance and lack of transportation are still persistent barriers for seeking maternal health care services in Ethiopia. High opportunity costs are associated with poor health service and lack of transportation which are major barriers to access maternal health services. Therefore, it is important to address these barriers to address inequalities and achieve universal access to basic health services through financial protection. This finding is confirmed by previous studies from developing countries, which demonstrate that communities with low household wealth were more unlikely to use health care services [19, 48]. Remoteness from health facilities increased community members’ out-of-pocket expenditure for transportation, cost for transportation to return home, medical and food expenses which create constraints and discourage the uptake of services [48, 49]. There is still the need to further expand reach to women for skilled delivery through facility expansion, community-based outreach service delivery, or voucher scheme and health insurance program [50]. In this regard, a concerted multi-sectoral approach is needed, including improved road access, transport, and availability of physical health infrastructure.

Lack of understanding among community members, specifically mothers, regarding the availability of PNC services as well as importance of the care, is another major reason for discontinuation of uptake of service at the postpartum stage. Participants perceived PNC as necessary only if obstetric complications occur and claimed that they are not informed to return for PNC services after childbirth. Similarly, lack of understanding among community members concerning the importance of maternal health care services is reported elsewhere [48]. This shows that maternal health services in Ethiopia are fragmented where mothers’ antepartum and intrapartum contacts with the health system are a missed opportunity and a significant missing link in the continuum of care [11]. The postpartum care service delivery model in Ethiopia mainly relies on home-based care provided by HEWs. Currently, women and babies are not receiving appropriate CoC at the postnatal stage in Ethiopia. The service delivery varies significantly from place to place, that is, from just discharging the woman within few hours of delivery and letting her visit the facility only if she gets ill to having a home-visit by HEWs. Health facilities lack of space to accommodate postpartum women and preference of the family to go home to celebrate birth and taken care of other children at home are some of the reasons mentioned by respondents for early discharge. As such, there is a need to strengthen the facility-based PNC, staying for at least 24-hours after delivery and providing care as recommended by WHO and the national guide [51, 52]. Besides, a mixed-method of service delivery modality that is both facility-based and home-based PNC care, home visits by community workers, or health care providers, would be helpful for Ethiopia that has about half of an estimated 3 million annual birth cohorts happening at home [40].

This study explored the reasons for discontinuation of maternal health services across the continuum, for an in-depth understanding of the phenomena and to give a better picture to help fully understand the contextual factors in Ethiopia. Thus, the findings of this study will have significant implications on the role players to prioritize intervention approaches and build strategies to improve the utilization of maternal health services across the continuum. However, this study was subject to certain limitations. First, the findings would be prone to social desirability and recall biases since studies are cross-sectional and data are collected from self-reported recall of behavior. Another limitation would be the qualitative findings are subjective and confounded by the individual’s prevailing contexts, making comparison and generalization difficult. To ensure the trustworthiness of the data, data triangulation was made, data was collected from different sources—recently delivered women, community volunteers, and community and religious leaders. Furthermore, the current study utilized IDIs and FGDs discussions to gather data, about the same phenomenon being investigated, as methodological triangulation. To ensure the credibility of the data, we framed the open-ended questions to be simple, not leading, and objective to minimize bias throughout the entire research process. The principal investigator and two research assistants who had experiences in qualitative research collected the data and we maintained neutrality throughout the data collection to not influence the participants’ responses. We probed and paraphrased the participants to elaborate on or clarify what they have said during the interviews or group discussions; we also discussed the findings and interpretations of the data to avoid bias and misinterpretation of the data. Moreover, data collection approaches, notes of any decisions made on the field, raw data, analysis notes, and interpretation of data were well documented to ensure confirmability of the data.

Conclusion

Ethiopian rural mothers still face multiple challenges to continuously uptake maternal health services. The primary maternal healthcare delivery system does not address women’s needs due to poor quality of care, incompetent and unfriendly providers, disrespectful and abusive care, difficulties of transportation, and weak and timely referral links. As such, the health system has to address these problems that remain fundamental to many women to continue across the pathways in Ethiopia. Moreover, postpartum care is weakly implemented. Thus, there is an urgent need to strengthen the quality of PNC provided in facilities by implementing the national directives stating 24-hours facility stay after birth [51] and educate communities about the need to have postpartum care.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. In-depth interview guide.

This is an in-depth interview guide we used to interview the participants in our study.

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Focus group discussion guide.

This is a focus group discussion guide we used to elicit discussion with respondents.

(DOCX)

S3 Appendix. IDI transcripts.

This file contains in-depth interview transcripts used for this analysis.

(DOC)

S4 Appendix. FGD transcripts.

These are focus group discussion transcripts used for this analysis.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Addis Continental Institute of Public Health and the University of Gondar are acknowledged for providing technical support during analysis and write-up. We take this opportunity to extend our gratitude to all the study participants for the time they gave to respond to the survey questionnaires and provide us with valuable information. We would also like to acknowledge Chalachew Bekele, Ayizohbel Adamu, and Thomas Solomon for their help in data collection and transcription. Adey Abebe is acknowledged for editing the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ANC

antenatal care

CoC

continuum of care

FGD

focus group discussion

HEP

Health Extension Program

HEW

Health Extension Worker

IDI

in-depth interview

L10K

Last Ten Kilometers Project

LMP

last menstrual period

PNC

postnatal care

WDA

Women Development Army

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. has provided us support in the form of salaries for author [GT]. However, any of the funders did not have role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019.
  • 2.WHO. Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chou D, Daelmans B, Jolivet RR, Kinney M, Say L. Ending preventable maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirths. BMJ. 2015;351:h4255. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.EPHI, ICF. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019: key indicators. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: EPHI and ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2019.
  • 5.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia], ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. CSA and ICF: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia], ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International. 2012;430. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh K, Story WT, Moran AC. Assessing the continuum of care pathway for maternal health in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Maternal and child health journal. 2016;20(2):281–9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1827-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Woldegiorgis MA, Hiller J, Mekonnen W, Meyer D, Bhowmik J. Determinants of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis. Health Services Research. 2019;54(5):1110–8. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kikuchi K, Okawa S, Zamawe COF, Shibanuma A, Nanishi K, Iwamoto A et al. Effectiveness of Continuum of Care—Linking Pre-Pregnancy Care and Pregnancy Care to Improve Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mwangi W, Gachuno O, Desai M, Obor D, Were V, Odhiambo F et al. Uptake of skilled attendance along the continuum of care in rural Western Kenya: selected analysis from Global Health initiative survey-2012. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1803-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. The Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1358–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005;83(4):1–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kruk ME, Rockers PC, Mbaruku G, Paczkowski MM, Galea S. Community and health system factors associated with facility delivery in rural Tanzania: a multilevel analysis. Health Policy. 2010;97(2–3):209–16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bhutta ZA, Ali S, Cousens S, Ali TM, Haider BA, Rizvi A et al. Interventions to address maternal, newborn, and child survival: what difference can integrated primary health care strategies make? The Lancet. 2008;372(9642):972–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beake S, Rose V, Bick D, Weavers A, Wray J. A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of women receiving in-patient postnatal care in one English maternity unit. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010;10(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gabrysch S, Campbell OM. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Emiru AA, Alene GD, Debelew GT. Women’s retention on the continuum of maternal care pathway in west Gojjam zone, Ethiopia: multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02953-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tiruneh GT, Worku A, Berhane Y, Betemariam W, Demissie M. Determinants of postnatal care utilization in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03254-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adamu Y, Salihu H. Barriers to the use of antenatal and obstetric care services in rural Kano, Nigeria. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2002;22(6):600–3. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000020349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cislaghi B, Heise L. Using social norms theory for health promotion in low-income countries. Health Promotion International. 2018;34(3):616–23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tankard ME, Paluck EL. Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2016;10(1):181–211. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miller DT, Prentice DA. Changing norms to change behavior. Annual review of psychology. 2016;67:339–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fantaye AW, Okonofua F, Ntoimo L, Yaya S. A qualitative study of community elders’ perceptions about the underutilization of formal maternal care and maternal death in rural Nigeria. Reproductive health. 2019;16(1):1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shiferaw S, Spigt M, Godefrooij M, Melkamu Y, Tekie M. Why do women prefer home births in Ethiopia? BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2013;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kea AZ, Tulloch O, Datiko DG, Theobald S, Kok MC. Exploring barriers to the use of formal maternal health services and priority areas for action in Sidama zone, southern Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1721-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Woldemicael G, Tenkorang EY. Women’s autonomy and maternal health-seeking behavior in Ethiopia. Maternal and child health journal. 2010;14(6):988–98. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0535-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ganle JK, Obeng B, Segbefia AY, Mwinyuri V, Yeboah JY, Baatiema L. How intra-familial decision-making affects women’s access to, and use of maternal healthcare services in Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2015;15(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0590-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Morgan R, Tetui M, Muhumuza Kananura R, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, George AS. Gender dynamics affecting maternal health and health care access and use in Uganda. Health Policy and Planning. 2017;32(suppl_5):v13–v21. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Singh K, Bloom S, Brodish P. Gender equality as a means to improve maternal and child health in Africa. Health care for women international. 2015;36(1):57–69. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2013.824971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Singh P, Sachs JD. 1 million community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015. The Lancet. 2013;382(9889):363–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62002-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.MOH. Ethiopia Health Sector Transformation Plan (2015/16-2019/2020). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministry of health, Ethiopia; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Damtew ZA, Karim AM, Chekagn CT, Zemichael NF, Yihun B, Willey BA et al. Correlates of the Women’s Development Army strategy implementation strength with household reproductive, maternal, newborn and child healthcare practices: a cross-sectional study in four regions of Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1975-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karim AM, Admassu K, Schellenberg J, Alemu H, Getachew N, Ameha A et al. Effect of Ethiopia’s health extension program on maternal and newborn health care practices in 101 rural districts: a dose-response study. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e65160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Godefay H, Byass P, Graham WJ, Kinsman J, Mulugeta A. Risk factors for maternal mortality in rural Tigray, northern Ethiopia: a case-control study. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Muluneh AG, Kassa GM, Alemayehu GA, Merid MW. High dropout rate from maternity continuum of care after antenatal care booking and its associated factors among reproductive age women in Ethiopia, Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey 2016. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234741. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haldane V, Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Singh SR, Koh GCH, Seng CK et al. Community participation in health services development, implementation, and evaluation: A systematic review of empowerment, health, community, and process outcomes. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maes K, Closser S, Vorel E, Tesfaye Y. A women’s development army: narratives of community health worker investment and empowerment in rural Ethiopia. Studies in Comparative International Development. 2015;50(4):455–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Collins K. Advanced sampling designs in mixed research: Current practices and emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia], ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key Indicators. Rockville, Maryland, USA: EPHI and ICF; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sakuma S, Yasuoka J, Phongluxa K, Jimba M. Determinants of continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health services in rural Khammouane, Lao PDR. PloS one. 2019;14(4):e0215635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Banks KP, Karim AM, Ratcliffe HL, Betemariam W, Langer A. Jeopardizing quality at the frontline of healthcare: prevalence and risk factors for disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in Ethiopia. Health policy and planning. 2018;33(3):317–27. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tekle Bobo F, Kebebe Kasaye H, Etana B, Woldie M, Feyissa TR. Disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Western Ethiopia: Should women continue to tolerate? Plos one. 2019;14(6):e0217126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Adatara P, Strumpher J, Ricks E. A qualitative study on rural women’s experiences relating to the utilisation of birth care provided by skilled birth attendants in the rural areas of Bongo District in the Upper East Region of Ghana. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2337-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS medicine. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey LC, Rathavy T, Okitsu A. Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health policy. 2010;95(2–3):255–63. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.EPHI, MoH, AMDD. Ethiopian Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Assessment 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health, and Averting Maternal Death and Disability (AMDD), Columbia University; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Titaley CR, Hunter CL, Heywood P, Dibley MJ. Why don’t some women attend antenatal and postnatal care services?: a qualitative study of community members’ perspectives in Garut, Sukabumi and Ciamis districts of West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Titaley CR, Hunter CL, Dibley MJ, Heywood P. Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery?: a qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2010;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gupta I, Joe W, Rudra S. Demand Side Financing in Health: How far can it address the issue of low utilization in developing countries. World Health Report (2010) Background Paper. 2010;27.
  • 51.MoH. Implementation Guide for 24-hours postnatal care and stay. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Minstry of Health, Ethiopia; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.WHO. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. Geneva, Switzerland: World health Organization; 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Kingston Rajiah

19 May 2021

PONE-D-20-38899

Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tiruneh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Your manuscript has undergone the peer-review process and the reviewers have provided their comments/suggestions. Kindly address these points/concerns before we make a decision.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 03 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kingston Rajiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[Addis Continental Institute of Public Health (ACIPH) and the University of Gondar (UoG) are acknowledged for providing support during analysis and write up.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 [The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.]

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

[The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.].   

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: General comments

Maternal and child health is still a priority of concern in Ethiopia. I read this manuscript with pleasure and I found it an interesting topic. In general, the study is presented logically and scientifically, well-edited, and it is in a standard English language. I have only a few comments mostly on clarification.

Q1. Under the methods(L120 – 124): The sentence starting with “ where I am providing technical assistance…) is confusing and not important to indicate who you are working for. In this study, there is more than one author and it is unknown who I refer to. This could also raise an issue of conflict of interests if the project owner is also the principal investigator of this study. I suggest either modifying this paragraph or avoiding using first-person singular pronouns.

Q2: Data collection: When were the themes developed? Was it before or after data collection? It is mentioned that you have used both deductive and inductive coding, but it is not clear if themes were developed after the interview based on the findings or you come up with pre-identified themes. Please also justify the reason to choose either one or both methods.

Q3. Results:

You have mentioned that the study used participants from high and low-performing districts(L137-139). However, in your results, when you quote the participants' thoughts, you didn't indicate whether the participant is from(high performing or low-performing district). In my opinion, it would be more informative if you could add where the participant is from( high or low performing district). E.g. ……………(Community leader, High performing district, IDI).

Q4. Although this study is not comparative, I think it is possible to narrate if there is any difference between the high performing and low performing districts with respect to your study themes. Are there any best practices or lessons learned from the high-performing districts? This can be included in your result or discussion part unless I have missed it.

Q5. The phrase(L314) “fear of the growth of the baby” is not clear. What does fear of the growth of the baby mean and how it could be a reason for discontinuation of PNC services?

Reviewer #2: 1. Title: In this study, authors mainly shared the community’s experience rather than perceptions; so I will suggest to remove the word “perception” from the title, and also to make the necessary changes throughout the document including the research questions and keywords.

2. Keywords: Suggesting to remove “postnatal care” as it is the part of continuum of care. Community has negative experience not only related to the postnatal care but also to the two other aspects (ANC and intrapartum) of continuum of care.

3. Financial disclosure: Without having any specific fund, how the data collection and data analysis chapters were managed? Is this study part of the L10K project? Is there any incentive or token of appreciation for the FGD and IDI participants? If not, what’s motivate them to participate in this study?

4. In Abstract: Number of FGD and IDI needs to mention clearly.

5. In the background, the definition of continuum of care needs to explain clearly. To justify the problem statement properly, the overall maternal health situation needs to describe including the trends of MMR, and how it differs between urban and rural areas. This study’s main focus is at the primary level health care which is not reflected in the background.

6. Method section: This is a qualitative study where purposive sampling is acceptable; even then, please mention “what are the efforts the investigators made to avoid biasness”, as at line 120-121, it was mentioned “how the principal investigator is involved with the study areas”, whether this working relationship affects the study findings or not. It was mentioned that the data analysis (line 189) is guided by the conceptual framework but I did not find the framework. I am suggesting to add the brief description of the framework in the method section

7. Results: Please add the age range for all kinds of participants in addition to their mean age. Line 219-220, please explain with references- what are the evidences of utilizing ANC, facility delivery, infant vaccination and postpartum family planning services by most of the women? Is it the study findings or overall Ethiopian’ maternal health situation? Throughout the document, I did not find any positive experience, almost all are the negative experiences mentioned by study participants. If the study participants have any positive experience which authors did not add to this manuscript or if there is any evidence, better to present with reference to justify this statement.

Mothers and the community are not aware of PNC service. As there is a national guideline [Ref 42], authors should discuss about this guideline early instead of mentioning at the last line of the conclusion; also “what are the barriers to implement this guideline”- need to discuss.

Why health promotion activity did not focus on PNC services? Who is the implementer of the health promotion activity, whether government or non- government/private agency? -- need to discuss.

Line 241- What is the reason of “unknown LMP” as it leads to delayed booking?

Line 324-“did not realize she is pregnant until the 4th or 5th month”; why these women did not notice their missed menstrual period? whether these women were having irregular menstrual period or not. All these issues need to be find out by the researchers?

Line 369 -370- as this study area is located in rural area; how the respondents are comparing their experience with that of urban patients; this is not clear to me

Line-379- “women give birth without disclosing their pregnancy”- can authors explain how women hide their 9-month pregnancy period? How the community or family members help them to hide it?

Line 523_ “unduly exposure of women’s reproductive organs and lack of privacy”- what does this mean? Whether the vaginal examination is done in open space in presence of other people who are not service providers. Because, at the line 362- the community leaders said that “he was waiting outside far from the delivery room” i.e. even husband was not allowed to stay with wife.

8. Discussion: This section is relatively weak and needs to be strengthening by explaining the study findings with proper justification and evidences. In this section, authors re-emphasised the study findings with some justification which is not sufficient. The study findings need to be explained by the authors. Example:

Line 535 – “lack of trust” – what is the suggestion of authors to improve the trust?

Line 558- why community people does not know about PNC service if it is available? What are the main barriers?

Line 563- “maternal health services are weak” whether authors can make this conclusion based on this qualitative study? To justify this statement, authors need to mention other evidences if available?

Line 565—566- this is confusing; if it is the responsibility of health workers to provide PNC at home; then why we are expecting that health care providers of the health center will suggest the mothers to come at the facility for PNC?

Line 571-574: If the authors suggested for “mixed-method of PNC service”, what will be the effective implementation strategy to avoid the duplication of services between health workers and health care providers, and how to ensure the proper implementation of PNC services. This needs to be explained clearly by authors.

9. Minor issues:

a. In-text citation should be within square bracket

b. Before using any abbreviation, it needs to spell out the full term first e.g. line 63 (COC), line 84 (EDHS), line 108 (HEP), line 120 (L10K); please check all abbreviation and make necessary changes following the rules of abbreviations. The list of abbreviation is also missing

c. Birr is the unit of currency in Ethiopia; it needs to be presented at the international currency unit like USD; otherwise it will be difficult for the international readers to understand it clearly

d. In the same way, authors should explain “kebeles”;

e. Line 198- please check the sentence to complete it

f. Community leader vs community elders (line 414, 426, 585) – needs to be consistent as the operational definition of leaders and elders are different.

g. At the end of each quotation whether the anonymous identifier can be part of the sentence e.g. “……………………………………….” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

h. What is the gender of community leaders? Are they all males or mixed i.e. some are males and rest are females, please mention it?

i. Line 133- community volunteers – do they receive any incentive for their work?

Reviewer #3: Good article and informative. Minimal errors need to be addressed:

1) Some abbreviations ie. CoC and HEW were not put in a full meaning - take note for the abbreviation in the article and the rest will follow the abbreviation. Please look at the introduction section.

2) How does author ensure the adequacy of the sample size in this study? Did not mention on whether saturation has been reached or not.

3) The word National in the National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care was put as small letter. The letter 'N' should be in capital letter.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Serebe Gebrie

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0255404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255404.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


14 Jul 2021

Point-by-point response to reviewer/editorial

Journal: PLOS ONE

Title: Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study (PONE-D-20-38899)

The authors would like to appreciate and thank the reviewers for the constructive comments.

Our point-by-point responses to the reviewers are below each of the comments in italics. We also make sure that this version of the manuscript conforms the journal style

Journal Requirements:

Updated funding and conflict of interest statements

Funding declaration: The authors declare that they did not receive funding for this research from any source. JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. has provided us support in the form of salaries for author [GT]. However, any of the funders did not have role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. One of the authors have been working for JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., a commercial company. We declared that this commercial affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: General comments

Maternal and child health is still a priority of concern in Ethiopia. I read this manuscript with pleasure and I found it an interesting topic. In general, the study is presented logically and scientifically, well-edited, and it is in a standard English language. I have only a few comments mostly on clarification.

Q1. Under the methods (L120 – 124): The sentence starting with “ where I am providing technical assistance…) is confusing and not important to indicate who you are working for. In this study, there is more than one author and it is unknown who I refer to. This could also raise an issue of conflict of interests if the project owner is also the principal investigator of this study. I suggest either modifying this paragraph or avoiding using first-person singular pronouns.

Comment well taken and addressed in this version.

Q2: Data collection: When were the themes developed? Was it before or after data collection? It is mentioned that you have used both deductive and inductive coding, but it is not clear if themes were developed after the interview based on the findings or you come up with pre-identified themes. Please also justify the reason to choose either one or both methods.

Thank you for the comments. First, we identified codes/constructs based on the theoretical framework and the IDI and FGD guides. Then, through reading and rereading of the transcripts and listening of the audios, we also produced new codes. Then we categorize and thematize the concepts.

Q3. Results:

You have mentioned that the study used participants from high and low-performing districts(L137-139). However, in your results, when you quote the participants' thoughts, you didn't indicate whether the participant is from(high performing or low-performing district). In my opinion, it would be more informative if you could add where the participant is from( high or low performing district). E.g. ……………(Community leader, High performing district, IDI).

Q4. Although this study is not comparative, I think it is possible to narrate if there is any difference between the high performing and low performing districts with respect to your study themes. Are there any best practices or lessons learned from the high-performing districts? This can be included in your result or discussion part unless I have missed it.

Comment well noted. We recruited three groups of respondents from two different contexts, better performing and low performing districts, to yield a wider perspective from various groups of stakeholders and contexts Accordingly, we have edited the sampling methods employed into maximum variation sampling schemes

Q5. The phrase(L314) “fear of the growth of the baby” is not clear. What does fear of the growth of the baby mean and how it could be a reason for discontinuation of PNC services?

Thank you for picking this error. It is to mean women’s perceived fear of overgrowth of the fetus if pregnant women attended frequent ANC visits during pregnancy. For that perception and fear, they discontinue for subsequent and more ANC visits. It is now corrected.

Reviewer #2: 1. Title: In this study, authors mainly shared the community’s experience rather than perceptions; so I will suggest to remove the word “perception” from the title, and also to make the necessary changes throughout the document including the research questions and keywords.

Thank you so much for the valid comments. The communities’ perceptions regarding the need for maternal and newborn health services, perceived reasons for recipient of recommended services, and discontinuation across the continuum of care is now elaborated, besides their experiences.

2. Keywords: Suggesting to remove “postnatal care” as it is the part of continuum of care. Community has negative experience not only related to the postnatal care but also to the two other aspects (ANC and intrapartum) of continuum of care.

comment well taken.

3. Financial disclosure: Without having any specific fund, how the data collection and data analysis chapters were managed? Is this study part of the L10K project? Is there any incentive or token of appreciation for the FGD and IDI participants? If not, what’s motivate them to participate in this study?

Thanks for the comments. The principal investigator covers the cost involved for data collection. Study participants were not paid for their participation in the study. We took their consent of participation. Besides, we conducted the data collection during the weekends and holly days.

4. In Abstract: Number of FGD and IDI needs to mention clearly.

comment well taken and addressed in the revised version

5. In the background, the definition of continuum of care needs to explain clearly. To justify the problem statement properly, the overall maternal health situation needs to describe including the trends of MMR, and how it differs between urban and rural areas. This study’s main focus is at the primary level health care which is not reflected in the background.

Comment well taken. The following paragraph is added. “Maternal and newborn health is a major public health problem in low-income countries. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is the only region with unacceptably high maternal mortality ratio, accounted for about two-thirds of global maternal deaths in 2017 [1]. Though Ethiopia achieved a substantial reduction in maternal death of roughly 61% between 2000-2017 [1], its maternal mortalities are still among the highest in the world [1-3] and persistently high neonatal mortality since the last two decades [4-6]. The utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services across the continuum remains low in SSA [7-9]. The uptake of services drastically declined from antenatal to the postnatal period, along with the CoC [10] where coverage is lowest during childbirth and postnatal period, and services are often fragmented and weakly implemented, limiting continuity of care [11]. “

6. Method section: This is a qualitative study where purposive sampling is acceptable; even then, please mention “what are the efforts the investigators made to avoid biasness”, as at line 120-121, it was mentioned “how the principal investigator is involved with the study areas”, whether this working relationship affects the study findings or not.

Sure, the principal investigator has prolonged engagement in the area during data collection with the study participants undertaking interviews and focus group discussions as well as well the principal investigator have been engaged long in the study area during the project implementation. This would help to well understand the community norms, beliefs, and language and get adequate information. To minimize biases, we undertook different methods including framing open-ended questions to prevent the participant from simply agreeing or disagreeing, and guide participants to provide a truthful and honest answer and engage them throughout the interview and maintain neutrality so as to not influence the participants’ responses. These are elaborated in the manuscript.

It was mentioned that the data analysis (line 189) is guided by the conceptual framework but I did not find the framework. I am suggesting to add the brief description of the framework in the method section

Comment well taken. The framework is now elaborated. Line 127-135

7. Results: Please add the age range for all kinds of participants in addition to their mean age.

Comment well taken and addressed.

Line 219-220, please explain with references- what are the evidences of utilizing ANC, facility delivery, infant vaccination and postpartum family planning services by most of the women? Is it the study findings or overall Ethiopian’ maternal health situation? Throughout the document, I did not find any positive experience, almost all are the negative experiences mentioned by study participants. If the study participants have any positive experience which authors did not add to this manuscript or if there is any evidence, better to present with reference to justify this statement.

Evidence show that there is increasing trend in the uptake of ANC, facility delivery, infant vaccination and postpartum family planning services in Ethiopia. Over the last decades, institutional delivery increased 5-fold and most mothers and more than three-fourth of mothers utilizing ANC, according to EDHS. This has elaborated in the revised version of the manuscript. Line 501-504

Mothers and the community are not aware of PNC service. As there is a national guideline [Ref 42], authors should discuss about this guideline early instead of mentioning at the last line of the conclusion; also “what are the barriers to implement this guideline”- need to discuss.

Why health promotion activity did not focus on PNC services? Who is the implementer of the health promotion activity, whether government or non- government/private agency? -- need to discuss.

Thanks a lot for the valid comments: According the national guideline, postpartum home visit is a responsibility of HEWs, frontline community health workers not health care providers. Besides, mothers are expected to visit health facilities for PNC. Reasons for early discharge are discussed in the revised version.

Line 241- What is the reason of “unknown LMP” as it leads to delayed booking?

Line 324-“did not realize she is pregnant until the 4th or 5th month”; why these women did not notice their missed menstrual period? whether these women were having irregular menstrual period or not. All these issues need to be find out by the researchers?

Respondents mentioned that due to use of contraceptives, there were irregularities in menstrual cycles. The following sentence is added to the results to elaborate more. “Moreover, according to the accounts of respondents, family planning methods women used might cause an absence of menstrual period and this might mislead women, becoming a reason for them not to go and test for pregnancy and thus the reason for not start their ANC early.” Line 251-53

Line 369 -370- as this study area is located in rural area; how the respondents are comparing their experience with that of urban patients; this is not clear to me

Sure, through respondents are from rural settings, those who are catchments of the woreda town health centers came to visit the town health center.

Line-379- “women give birth without disclosing their pregnancy”- can authors explain how women hide their 9-month pregnancy period? How the community or family members help them to hide it?

It means to say, they don’t want to disclose their pregnancy to their relatives or people in their community/village that are far from them. As the settlement of the rural community is very sparse, they could hide themselves not disclosing to all their community and relatives far away from them. They could also avoid social events or gatherings like market places, churches, mosques, etc. Those who are near to their house would definitely know.

Line 523_ “unduly exposure of women’s reproductive organs and lack of privacy”- what does this mean? Whether the vaginal examination is done in open space in presence of other people who are not service providers. Because, at the line 362- the community leaders said that “he was waiting outside far from the delivery room” i.e. even husband was not allowed to stay with wife.

It means that naked and lithotomy position exposes their reproductive organ to those assistant health care providers, apprenticeship students, and other laboring women not only during vaginal examination during the whole laboring process.

8. Discussion: This section is relatively weak and needs to be strengthening by explaining the study findings with proper justification and evidences. In this section, authors re-emphasised the study findings with some justification which is not sufficient. The study findings need to be explained by the authors. Example:

Line 535 – “lack of trust” – what is the suggestion of authors to improve the trust?

comment well taken and addressed in the revised version. Line 565-6

Line 558- why community people does not know about PNC service if it is available? What are the main barriers?

Postnatal care is weakly implemented in the country. It is less prioritized and not integrated with ANC and immunization services well. Accordingly, health care providers are not providing adequate counseling services to mothers regarding importance of PNC and place of PNC. This is well articulated in the manuscript.

Line 563- “maternal health services are weak” whether authors can make this conclusion based on this qualitative study? To justify this statement, authors need to mention other evidences if available?

Comment well taken and addressed in the revised version

Line 565—566- this is confusing; if it is the responsibility of health workers to provide PNC at home; then why we are expecting that health care providers of the health center will suggest the mothers to come at the facility for PNC? Line 571-574: If the authors suggested for “mixed-method of PNC service”, what will be the effective implementation strategy to avoid the duplication of services between health workers and health care providers, and how to ensure the proper implementation of PNC services. This needs to be explained clearly by authors.

Thanks a lot for the valid comments: According the national guideline, postpartum home visit is a responsibility of HEWs, frontline community health workers not health care providers. Besides, mothers are expected to visit health facilities for PNC. Reasons for early discharge are also discussed in the revised version.

9. Minor issues:

a. In-text citation should be within square bracket

Well noted. It is now changed into SpringerVancouverNumber that is with a square bracket as recommended by the Journal.

b. Before using any abbreviation, it needs to spell out the full term first e.g. line 63 (COC), line 84 (EDHS), line 108 (HEP), line 120 (L10K); please check all abbreviation and make necessary changes following the rules of abbreviations. The list of abbreviation is also missing

Thanks much. All acronyms are spelled out in the text and list of acronyms are now presented (Line 608)

c. Birr is the unit of currency in Ethiopia; it needs to be presented at the international currency unit like USD; otherwise it will be difficult for the international readers to understand it clearly

Thanks. Comment well taken and addressed in this version.

d. In the same way, authors should explain “kebeles”;

comment well taken and defined the revised version as Kebele is the lowest administrative units of the country.

e. Line 198- please check the sentence to complete it

edited; thanks

f. Community leader vs community elders (line 414, 426, 585) – needs to be consistent as the operational definition of leaders and elders are different.

Thanks; well addressed

g. At the end of each quotation whether the anonymous identifier can be part of the sentence e.g. “……………………………………….” (recently delivered mother, FGD).

Addressed

h. What is the gender of community leaders? Are they all males or mixed i.e. some are males and rest are females, please mention it?

All were males. And mentioned in the methods section

i. Line 133- community volunteers – do they receive any incentive for their work?

Though there is no uniform and standard performance-based incentive mechanisms. There are some form of incentives including non-financial (like recognition) and provision of in kind items like uniforms, shoes, etc.

Reviewer #3: Good article and informative. Minimal errors need to be addressed:

1) Some abbreviations ie. CoC and HEW were not put in a full meaning - take note for the abbreviation in the article and the rest will follow the abbreviation. Please look at the introduction section.

Thanks a lot for the comments. We addressed these and similar errors.

2) How does author ensure the adequacy of the sample size in this study? Did not mention on whether saturation has been reached or not.

Thanks a lot for the valuable comments. The following sentence is added in this version. “The principal investigator and research assistants collected and analyzed informational redundancy, data saturation, after conducting three FGDs and six IDIs (30).” Line 145-6

3) The word National in the National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care was put as small letter. The letter 'N' should be in capital letter.

Thanks again. It is addressed.

Decision Letter 1

Kingston Rajiah

16 Jul 2021

Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study

PONE-D-20-38899R1

Dear Dr. Tiruneh,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kingston Rajiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Kingston Rajiah

22 Jul 2021

PONE-D-20-38899R1

Community’s experience and perceptions of maternal health services across the continuum of care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study

Dear Dr. Tiruneh:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Kingston Rajiah

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. In-depth interview guide.

    This is an in-depth interview guide we used to interview the participants in our study.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Appendix. Focus group discussion guide.

    This is a focus group discussion guide we used to elicit discussion with respondents.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Appendix. IDI transcripts.

    This file contains in-depth interview transcripts used for this analysis.

    (DOC)

    S4 Appendix. FGD transcripts.

    These are focus group discussion transcripts used for this analysis.

    (DOCX)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES