Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2021 Jul 23;6(30):19553–19558. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01964

A Novel Imide-Bridged Polysiloxane Membrane Was Prepared via One-Pot Hydrosilylation Reaction for O2/N2 Separation

Shuangping Xu , Wenqiang Ma , Hailiang Zhou , Yushu Zhang , Hongge Jia †,*, Jingyu Xu †,‡,*, Pengfei Jiang , Xintian Wang , Wenwen Zhao
PMCID: PMC8340101  PMID: 34368541

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c01964_0007.jpg

The synthesis of poly(methyhydrosiloxane) (PMHS) and N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide was optimized for O2/N2 separation. The membrane exhibits excellent mechanical and thermal properties and shows an O2/N2 selectivity of up to 4.44 with an O2 permeability of 31.0 Barrer; compared with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and pure polyimide (PI) membranes, the separation selectivity shows a 107% increase for PDMS, and the permeation shows a 660% increase for pure PI. The obtained results were well above the ones reported on the literature for similar conditions opening the door for the preparation of a stable polysiloxane (PMHS-I) gas separation membrane with extraordinary O2/N2 separation performance.

1. Introduction

Membrane gas separation technology has been of profound attention in many industrial applications due to the advantages of low energy consumption, high efficiency, and environmental friendliness compared with conventional gas separation processes such as cryogenic distillation and pressure swing adsorption.14 In the membrane gas separation application, the membrane materials play the leading role.5 Therefore, all kinds of materials have been utilized for these membranes in the last three decades. Among various membrane materials, polymeric membranes have been widely developed and applied according to their low cost, easy processability, and good mechanical property. However, most polymeric membranes follow a trade-off phenomenon where permeability and selectivity are mutually dependent (permeability decreases when selectivity increases and vice versa),6,7 which would limit their further application in an actual membrane gas separation process.

The polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane shows high oxygen permeability with the lowest selectivity of O2/N2 and poor film forming ability because the Si–O–Si bonds in the polymer are very flexible.814 Polyimide (PI) has a relatively high PO2/PN2 (low PO2) and good film forming ability because of its unique rigid structures with imide rings.4,1519 As well known, permeating routes of oxygen through the polymer membranes are hard to control because there are dynamic spaces between their macromolecules. To overcome the two disadvantages, we hope that polymer chain rigidification that would limit the transportation of large gas molecules and facilitate the transportation of small molecules, leading to the enhancement of gas selectivity.2027 In this study, we continued our work on predicting gas separation in the ladder polysiloxane,28 and we will report an imide-bridged polysiloxane by reaction poly(methyhydrosiloxane) (PMHS) with N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide (DAI) via a one-pot hydrosilylation reaction. In this reaction, the ratios and block length sizes as well as the number of functional groups can be precisely adjusted by reaction conditions, and at the same time, the functionalization via hydrosilylation provides good conversions without notable side reactions.29 Their membrane is expected to increase the O2/N2 separation with high gas permeation. In this experiment, diene-bridged polysiloxanes were used for the first time to make controlled cross-linking reactions of polysiloxanes using more convenient and simple means, with low reaction cost, high efficiency, short time, and high controllability.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

All the solvents used for monomer synthesis and polymerization were distilled as usual. Poly(methyhydrosiloxane) (PMHS) with an average molecular weight that ranged from 3000 was purchased from Wuhan Hanxiang Biotechnology Co. 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylic anhydride (PMDA) and 3-aminopropene were purchased from Aladdin, Karstedt’s catalyst was purchased from KeJunchi, and acetone and chloroform were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was purchased from Kaitong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin). The composition of mixed gas used in this work was made of O2/N2 (50/50, v/v %). Purity (99.999%) was purchased from Xuelong Petrochemical Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Daqing). DA was synthesized according to ref (28).

2.2. Synthesis Method of N,N′-Bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic Diimide (DAI)

As shown in Scheme 1, N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide (DAI) was synthesized through a transimidation from DA reaction with 3-aminopropene, where DA was synthesized according to ref (28).

Scheme 1. Synthesis of N,N′-Bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic Diimide (DAI).

Scheme 1

Pyromellitic diimide (DAI, 2.16 g) was added into a three-necked flask with a condenser and magnetic stirring bar, and then it was evacuated and purged with nitrogen five times. DMF (5.00 mL) and 50.0 mL of toluene were added, then the mixture was heated to 70 °C for 0.5 h, and 1.5 mL of 3-aminopropene was added and stirred at 130 °C for 48 h. After cooling to room temperature, filtration was applied to remove the solid. Then, the solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to about 5 mL. The residual solution was poured into a large amount of MeOH, and the precipitation was filtrated and dried in vacuo to give a white solid.

2.3. Synthesis and Membrane Fabrication of PMHS-I

Imide-bridged polysiloxane (PMHS-I) was synthesized via a hydrosilylation reaction, according to Scheme 2. Then, the solution was poured directly into a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) dish and dried to give a self-standing membrane.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Imido-Bridged Polysiloxane (PMHS-I).

Scheme 2

Pyromellitic diimide (DAI, 6.87 g) and 10 mg of Karstedt’s catalyst were added into a three-necked flask with a condenser and magnetic stirring bar, and then it was evacuated and purged with nitrogen five times; 30 mL of THF was added and stirred at 85 °C for 1 h, and then 11.6 mL of polymethylhydrogensiloxane (PMHS) was added and stirred for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was poured into a 10 cm diameter Teflon (PTFE) dish. After the solvent was evaporated for 12 h at 25 °C, the membranes were detached from the dish and dried in vacuo at 25 °C for 24 h. The thickness (L) of the membranes was between 150 and 152 μm, and the mechanical properties of the membranes were tested five times, as shown in Table S1.

2.4. Measurements

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to record functional group information (Spectrum Two, PE Company, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The thickness gauge was used to test the membrane thickness (CH-1-B hand-type millimeter thickness gauge, graduation value: 0.001 mm, measurement range: 0–1 mm, and error range: ≤0.007 mm, Shanghai Liuling Instrument Factory, China). A film tensile testing machine was used to record the mechanical property at 25 °C (XLW(PC)-500 N, Sumspring, Jinan, China). The thermal performance of the membranes was recorded by a thermogravimetric analyzer (Q5000IRS type, American TA Co., Ltd., USA). A gas transmission instrument was used to test permeation under different pressures (GTR-11MH type, GTR TEC Corporation, Kyoto, Japan; test area: 0.785 cm2; test temperature: 34 °C; test pressure: 49 KPa; gas mixture pressure: 0.1 MPa; carrier gas (H2) pressure: 0.5 MPa).

2.5. Calculations

The gas permeability coefficient P was calculated by the following relation (eq 1):

2.5. 1

where q is the transmission volume (mL), K is the auxiliary positive coefficient (the fixed value is 2), it is the setting point instrument by factory, L is the film thickness (cm), p is the permeability pressure (cmHg), t is the measurement time (s), and a is the area of the gas permeation film (the fixed value is 0.785 cm2).

In this experiment, the gas separation factor was calculated by the following relation (eq 2):

2.5. 2

where PO2 and PN2 attributed to gas pressure (O2 and N2, respectively), which can be calculated in eq 1. Pure gas permeation property tests were performed with a fixed-volume pressure increase instrument time-lag apparatus (VAC-V2 type, Labthink Instrument Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) at 34 °C. The membranes were first placed in a stainless-steel cell, and the disk was sealed with rubber O-rings to avoid leakage. Then, both the upstream and downstream sides of the system were degassed at ambient temperature to ensure that the system was not disturbed. Next, pure gases (O2 and N2) were fed into the membrane individually, and the permeance of each pure gas was measured at a feed pressure of 2 bar. The gas permeance P was calculated by the following relation (eq 3):

2.5. 3

where dp/dt is the slope (cmHg/s) of the pressure against time in the pseudo-steady state, V is the downstream volume (cm3) of gas permeation, Δp (cmHg) is the difference in the pressure between the two sides of the membrane, A is the effective membrane area (3.14 cm2), P0 is 76 cmHg, T0 is 273 K, and T is the measured temperature of 307 K. The ideal selectivity coefficients of gases A and B are reported as the ratio of the permeance of PA and PB, respectively. The conversion of hydrosilylation (degree of cross-linking) is calculated using the flow equation:31

2.5.

where A(PMHS,2168) and A(PMHS,1261) represented integral absorption intensities at 2168 and 1261 cm–1 PMHS, respectively. A(PMHS-I,2168) and A(PMHS-I,1261) represented integral absorption intensities at 2168 and 1261 cm–1 PMHS-I, respectively. In addition, the characteristic peak existing at 1705 cm–1 attributed to the C=C group in PMHS-I, which suggested that a small part of butadiene reacted with Si–H and the generated C=C group only.31

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

DAI was accomplished by introducing 3-aminopropene through a transimidation from diimide (DA) rather than the reaction of 1,2,4,5-benzenetetracarboxylic anhydride (PMDA) with 3-aminopropene. Because the above-mentioned transamination leads to the almost exclusive formation of the target product, because the byproduct is NH3 in the formation of DAI, it will promote the reaction. This can be found from the 1H NMR data of DAI (Figure S1), and 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, δ/ppm: 165.70, 137.23, 130.68, 118.72, 118.40, and 40.70.) (Figure 1) shows similar results where there is only DAI resonating without any other byproduct.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

13C NMR spectra of N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide in CDCl3.

The IR spectra of PMHS-I, PMHS, and DAI are shown in Figure 2. The peak around 2168 cm–1 was credited to the Si–H bond stretching vibration from PMHS; the absorption peak at 1705 cm–1 attributed to the C=C bond stretching vibration in DAI correspondingly. However, these two peaks from the spectrum of PMHS-I have disappeared, indicating the hydrosilylation process between PMHS and DAI. In addition, the peak observed at 1380 cm–1 corresponded to the characteristic peak of the imide structure and the absorption peak at 1023 cm–1 can be ascribed to the Si–O–Si bond stretching vibration, which verified the successful synthesis of PMHS-I.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

IR spectra of PMHS, DAI, and PMHS-I in KBr.

It is obvious from Figure 2 that the absorption intensity of Si–CH3 is much higher than that of Si–H in PMHS-I after the completion of hydrosilylation. Because Si–CH3 does not participate in the hydrosilylation reaction, we can conclude that most Si–H groups reacted with C=C groups, and the conversion of hydrosilylation (degree of cross-linking) was about 97.52%.

3.2. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PMHS-I Membranes

Tensile stress strain tests were carried out to investigate the mechanical properties of the PMHS-I membrane. The average values of the yield strength, tensile strength, elongation at break, and tensile modulus of samples are determined and shown in Table 1. The PMHS-I membrane shows better mechanical properties than PDMS, and the results indicated that PMHS-I is a cross-linked polysiloxane.

Table 1. Mechanical Properties of PMHS-I Membranes Compared with PDMS and PI Membranesa.

sample THKb (μm) σsc (MPa) Εbd (%) TSe (MPa) Ef (MPa) reference
PMHS-I 151.0 ± 1.00 12.5 ± 0.20 9.0 ± 0.14 24.5 ± 0.20 271.0 ± 1.00 this work
PDMS     0.7 ± 0.01 1.8 ± 0.50 89.0 ± 5.10 (30)
a

Tested at 5.00 mm/min speed. The standard spline had a length of 40 mm and a width of 10 mm.

b

Thickness (THK).

c

Yield strength (σs).

d

Elongation at break (Eb).

e

Tensile strength (TS).

f

Modulus of elasticity (E).

As shown in Table 1, we can see that the elongation at break of the unmodified pure polysiloxane film is 0.70%, the tensile strength is 1.80 MPa, and the elastic modulus is 89.0 MPa. In this work, the elongation at break of the modified polysiloxane increased 11.9 times (9.00%), the tensile strength increased 12.6 times (24.5 MPa), and the modulus of elasticity increased 2.04 times (271.0 MPa). This huge improvement is because the imide group is a rigid group, while the polysiloxane is a flexible chain-like group. The rigid group is introduced into the polysiloxane, and a cross-linked network structure is synthesized. The amplitude improves the mechanical properties of the membrane.32

As shown in Figure 3, thermogravimetric analysis (TG) was performed on PMHS-I and the experimental results showed a 5% weight loss at 339 °C and a 50% temperature loss at 462 °C. The structure of the imide chain in the molecule has good thermal stability. This can further indicate the successful preparation of PMHS-1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

TG analysis of the PMHS-I membrane.

The self-supporting films obtained in this work all start to lose weight after 300 °C and lose weight rapidly in a very short period of time compared to ref (31). While the weight loss of the separation membranes in the references reached more than 90% when the temperature reached about 500 °C,33 the present work resulted in a final weight loss of only 60% due to the introduction of a rigid structural imide.

3.3. Gas Separation Properties

The single-gas permeability coefficient and selectivity of the obtained PMHS-I membrane are shown in Table 2. The PMHS-I membrane yielded permeances of 35.2 and 9.52 Barrer for O2 and N2, respectively, and a selectivity of 3.70 for O2/N2. Compared with PDMS and pure PI membranes, PMHS-I membranes exhibited higher permeances of O2 and N2 for the pure PI membrane and better selectivity of O2/N2 for the PDMS membrane. Accordingly, the ideal selectivity of oxygen and nitrogen is contributed from both solubility selectivity (SO2/SN2) and diffusivity selectivity (DO2/DN2), and from the experimental results, the diffusivity selectivity plays a leading role compared to solubility selectivity. As demonstrated above, PMHS-I is a rigid imide chain-bridged polysiloxane with a restricted network structure; the smaller O2 molecules can directly diffuse through the network, while larger N2 molecules are forced to take more tortuous diffusion transportation pathways, leading to the improvement of gas selectivity.

Table 2. Gas Permeability, Solubility, and Diffusivity Coefficients of Membranes Measured at 34 °C.

  pure gas
   
 
  P
  S
  D
              mixed gas
 
samples O2 N2   O2 N2   O2 N2   PO2/PN2   SO/SN2   DO2/DN2   PO2 PN2 PO2 /PN2 reference
PMHS-I 35.20 9.52   1.24 1.01   2.84 0.94   3.70   1.23   3.01   31.00 6.98 4.44 this work
PDMS                               600.00 280.00 2.14 (34)
pure PI 0.46 0.09               5.11                 (35)

To obtain the true membrane permselectivity in practical applications, we tested the permselectivity of the obtained PMHS-I membrane for mixed gas. The results are compared to the pure gas performance, as shown in Table 2. Both O2 and N2 permeabilities have decreased compared with the pure gas permeation properties, but the decrease in N2 permeability is more pronounced; as a result, the selectivity of O2/N2 has increased. In the final analysis, the transportation of a component is slightly different due to the effect of sorption competition between the gas molecules in the binary gas mixture. Overall, the agreement between the mixed gas selectivity and the pure gas selectivity for O2/N2 was good.

Compared with ref (28), Xu et al. reported a flexible self-standing membrane from the imido-bridged ladder polysiloxane with a high molecular weight; the membrane achieves an oxygen permeation of 1.67 Barrer and an oxygen-nitrogen separation of 4.44. This study simplified the synthesis steps while maintaining the separation ability of oxygen and nitrogen and increased the oxygen transmission rate 17.56 times, which is a simpler and more effective method with good scientific prospects.

The cross-linking degree of polysiloxane obtained in this work is calculated by the above formula to reach 97.52%. A higher degree of cross-linking means that the imide structure is fully introduced into the polysiloxane. Because PI has a high PO2/PN2,28 the acyl full introduction of the imine structure greatly improves the PO2/PN2 of the PMHS-I film.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel imide-bridged polysiloxane was successfully synthesized by poly(methyhydrosiloxane) reacting to N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide with Karstedt’s catalyst via one-pot hydrosilylation. The obtained self-standing membranes showed excellent mechanical and thermal properties. The membrane showed better O2 permselectivity (PO2/PN2 = 4.44) than PDMS (2.14) and a higher O2 permeability (31.0 Barrer) than pure PI (0.46). The high selectivity was provided by the enhancement of diffusion selectivity by the network structure, creating small pores (ultramicropores) based on imido linkages.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds in Heilongjiang Provincial Universities (YSTSXK201867), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China (LH2019B032), and the Graduate Innovative Research Project of Qiqihar University (YJSCX2020058).

Glossary

Abbreviations

THF

tetrahydrofuran

DAI

N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide

PMHS

polymethylhydrogensiloxane

PMHS-I

imide-bridged polysiloxane

PTFE

Teflon

DA

diimide

S

solubility selectivity

D

diffusivity selectivity

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c01964.

  • Mechanical properties of PMHS-I membranes, gas separation of PMHS-I membranes, and 1H NMR spectra of N,N′-bis(3-allyl)pyromellitic diimide (DAI) in CDCl3 (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao1c01964_si_001.pdf (119.3KB, pdf)

References

  1. Basu S.; Khan A. L.; Angels C.-O.; Liu C.; Vankelecom I. F. J. Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 750–768. 10.1039/B817050A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pandey P.; Chauhan R. S. Membranes for gas separation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 853–893. 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galizia M.; Chi W. S.; Smith Z. P.; Merkel T. C.; Baker R. W.; Freeman B. D. 50th Anniversary Perspective: Polymers and Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation: A Review and Prospective Opportunities. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7809–7843. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guiver M. D.; Lee Y. M. Polymer rigidity improves microporous membranes. Science 2013, 339, 284–285. 10.1126/science.1232714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang M.; Zhao J.; Wang X.; Liu A.; Liu; Gleason K. K. Recent progress on submicron gas-selective polymeric membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8860–8886. 10.1039/C7TA01862B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drioli E.; Stankiewicz A. I.; Macedonio F.. Membrane engineering in process intensification-An overview. 2011, 380, 1–8 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.043. [DOI]
  7. Du N.; Park H. B.; Dal-Cin M. M.; Guiver M. D. Advances in high permeability polymeric membrane materials for CO2 separations. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7306–7322. 10.1039/C1EE02668B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Merkel T. C.; Bondar V. I.; Nagai K.; Freeman B. D.; Pinnau I. Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane). J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 415–434. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mukherjee S.; Xie R.; Reynolds V. G.; Uchiyama T.; Levi A. E.; Valois E.; Wang H; Chabinyc M. L.; Bates C. M. Universal Approach to Photo-Crosslink Bottlebrush Polymers. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 1090–1097. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dvornic P. R.; Lenz R. W. Exactly alternating silarylene-siloxane polymers. 9. Relationships between polymer structure and glass transition temperature. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 3769–3778. 10.1021/ma00040a024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Redmond S. U. A.; Radovanovic E.; Torriani I. L.; Yoshida I. V. P. Polycyclic silicone membranes. Synthesis, characterization and permeability evaluation. Polymer 2001, 42, 1319–1327. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00520-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kurian P.; Kasibhatla B.; Daum J.; Burns C. A.; Moosa M.; Rosenthal K. S.; Kennedy J. P. Synthesis, permeability and biocompatibility of tricomponent membranes containing polyethylene glycol, polydimethylsiloxane and polypentamethylcyclopentasiloxane domains. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 3493–3503. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00189-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurian P.; Kennedy J. P. Novel tricomponent membranes containing poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(pentamethylcyclopentasiloxane)/poly(dimethylsiloxane) domains. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 3093–3102. 10.1002/pola.10391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Park H. B.; Kim C. K.; Lee Y. M. Gas separation properties of polysiloxane/polyether mixed soft segment urethane urea membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 204, 257–269. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00048-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo X. G.; Kim F. S.; Seger M. J.; Jenekhe S. A.; Mark D.; Watson M. D. Naphthalene Diimide-Based Polymer Semiconductors: Synthesis, Structure-Property Correlations, and n-Channel and Ambipolar Field-Effect Transistors. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 1434–1442. 10.1021/cm2034273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maier G. Low dielectric constant polymers for microelectronics. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 3–65. 10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00043-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Z.; Wang D.; Jin J. Microporous Polyimides with Rationally Designed Chain Structure Achieving High Performance for Gas Separation. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 7477–7483. 10.1021/ma5017506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhuang Y.; Seong J. G.; Lee W. H.; Do Y. S.; Lee M. J.; Wang G.; Guiver M. D.; Lee Y. M. Mechanically Tough, Thermally Rearranged (TR) Random/Block Poly(benzoxazole-co-imide) Gas Separation Membranes. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 5286–5299. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Weng C.-J.; Jhuo Y.-S.; Huang K.-Y.; Feng C.-F.; Yeh J.-M.; Wei Y.; Tsai H.-M. Mechanically and Thermally Enhanced Intrinsically Dopable Polyimide Membrane with Advanced Gas Separation Capabilities. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 6067–6076. 10.1021/ma201130s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tsujita Y.; Yoshimura K.; Yoshimuzu H.; Takizawa A.; Kinoshita T.; Furukawa M.; Yamada Y.; Wada K. Structure and gas permeability of siloxane-imide block copolymer membranes: 1. Effect of siloxane content. Polymer 1993, 34, 2597–2601. 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90595-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghalei B.; Sakurai K.; Kinoshita Y.; Wakimoto K.; Isfahani A. P.; Song Q.; Doitomi K.; Furukawa S.; Hirao H.; Kusuda H.; Kitagawa S.; Sivaniah E. Enhanced selectivity in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 capture through efficient dispersion of amine-functionalized MOF nanoparticles. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17086. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.86. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sim Y. H.; Wang H.; Li F. Y.; Chua M. L.; Chung T. S.; Toriida M.; Tamai S. High performance carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from hyperbranched polyimide precursors for improved gas separation applications. Carbon 2013, 53, 101–111. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Park J.; Gaines K. E.; Jheng L.-C.; Riffle J. S.; Mecham S. J.; McGrath J. E.; Park H. B.; Paul D. R.; Freeman B. D. Characterization and gas transport properties of UV-irradiated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-containing polyimide copolymer membranes. Polymer 2020, 210, 122966. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ghosh A.; Sen S. K.; Dasgupta B.; Banerjee S.; Voit B. Synthesis, characterization and gas transport properties of new poly(imide siloxane) copolymers from 4, 4′-(4, 4′-isopropylidenediphenoxy)bis(phthalic anhydride)-ScienceDirect. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364, 211–218. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Park H. B.; Kim J. K.; Nam S. Y.; Lee Y. M. Imide-siloxane block copolymer/silica hybrid membranes: preparation, characterization and gas separation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 220, 59–73. 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00215-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shin J. H.; Yu H. J.; An H.; Lee A. S.; Hwang S. S.; Lee S. Y.; Lee J. S. Rigid double-stranded siloxane-induced high-flux carbon molecular sieve hollow fiber membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 15, 504–512. 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu H.; Li X.; Li Y.; Wang S.; Guo R.; Jiang Z.; Wu C.; Xin Q.; Lu X. Facilitated transport mixed matrix membranes incorporated with amine functionalized MCM-41 for enhanced gas separation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 465, 78–90. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Xu S.; Aoki T.; Teraguchi M.; Kaneko T. High Oxygen Permselectivity through a Membrane from Novel Soluble Imido-Bridged Ladder Polysiloxane. Chem. Lett. 2016, 45, 424–426. 10.1246/cl.151196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Boehm P.; Mondeshki M.; Frey H. Polysiloxane-Backbone Block Copolymers in a One-Pot Synthesis: A Silicone Platform for Facile Functionalization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1861–1867. 10.1002/marc.201200365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chakraborty R.; Soucek M. D. Mechanical and film properties of thermally curable polysiloxane. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 358–369. 10.1002/app.29820. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang C.; Cui X.; Sun J.; Ding R.; Zhang Q.; Xu Y. Transparent and Dense Ladder-Like Alkylene-Bridged Polymethylsiloxane Coating with Enhanced Water Vapor Barrier Property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22157–22165. 10.1021/acsami.5b08084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hossain I.; Kim D.; Al Munsur A. Z.; Roh J. M.; Park H. B.; Kim T.-H. PEG/PPG-PDMS-Based Cross-Linked Copolymer Membranes Prepared by ROMP and In Situ Membrane Casting for CO2 Separation: An Approach to Endow Rubbery Materials with Properties of Rigid Polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 24, 27286–27299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang J.; Chen Z.; Fu W.; Ping X.; Li Z.; Yan S.; Zhang R. Supramolecular template-directed synthesis of stable and high-efficiency photoluminescence 9,10-diphenylanthryl-bridged ladder polysiloxane. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 2491–2497. 10.1002/pola.24021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Robb M. L. Thin Silicone Membranestheir Permeation Properties And Some Applications. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1968, 146, 119–137. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lua A. C.; Shen Y. Preparation and characterization of polyimide-silica composite membranes and their derived carbo-silica composite membranes for gas separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 441–451. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao1c01964_si_001.pdf (119.3KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES