Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Consum Commun Netw Conf. 2021 Mar 11;2021:10.1109/ccnc49032.2021.9369490. doi: 10.1109/ccnc49032.2021.9369490

Irregular Metronomes as Assistive Devices to Promote Healthy Gait Patterns

Aaron D Likens *, Spyridon Mastorakis , Andreas Skiadopoulos *, Jenny A Kent , Md Washik Al Azad , Nick Stergiou *
PMCID: PMC8340876  NIHMSID: NIHMS1693207  PMID: 34368399

Abstract

Older adults and people suffering from neurodegenerative disease often experience difficulty controlling gait during locomotion, ultimately increasing their risk of falling. To combat these effects, researchers and clinicians have used metronomes as assistive devices to improve movement timing in hopes of reducing their risk of falling. Historically, researchers in this area have relied on metronomes with isochronous interbeat intervals, which may be problematic because normal healthy gait varies considerably from one step to the next. More recently, researchers have advocated the use of irregular metronomes embedded with statistical properties found in healthy populations. In this paper, we explore the effect of both regular and irregular metronomes on many statistical properties of interstride intervals. Furthermore, we investigate how these properties react to mechanical perturbation in the form of a halted treadmill belt while walking. Our results demonstrate that metronomes that are either isochronous or random break down the inherent structure of healthy gait. Metronomes with statistical properties similar to healthy gait seem to preserve those properties, despite a strong mechanical perturbation. We discuss the future development of this work in the context of networked augmented reality metronome devices.

Keywords: Assistive Devices, Gait Rehabilitation, Gait Metronomes, Multifractal, Augmented Reality, Networking and Computing

I. Introduction

A number of clinical populations experience difficulty in controlling gait during locomotion, and such difficulties increase the risk of falling. Hence, there is a strong interest in developing easy-to-use technology to improve gait, and ultimately, prevent falls. In recent years, a number of researchers and clinicians have noted the benefit of using metronomes to improve the control of human gait in cases of aging and neurodegenerative disease such as Parkinson’s Disease [1], [2]. Similar improvements have been observed in athletic training, where the effect of metronomic training has been suggested to exhibit a general effect on motor coordination. Hence, the use of metronomes shows great promise in these clinical and exercise science settings [3]. An issue, though, is that those studies have largely used isochronous interbeat intervals for training and rehabilitation. An alternative approach is the use of irregular metronomes based on the statistical regularities observed in gait patterns of young, healthy people [4], [5]. Results from our team suggest this alternative approach may restore healthy gait patterns in older adults [2], [5].

The contribution of this paper is two-fold. First, we present a laboratory study that employs irregular metronomes within the context of mechanical perturbations to gait. Second, we discuss our ongoing work re-thinking these metronomes as devices with advanced networking capabilities, enhanced with immersive technologies, such as Augmented Reality. Our paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we give a brief background and discuss related work, while in Section III, we present our methodology. In Section IV, we present our evaluation, and, in Section V, we discuss directions on developing the next-generation of network-capable metronomes. Finally, in Section VI, we conclude our work.

II. Background and Related Work

Variability is a fundamental to human movements and the underlying physiological processes that support them [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Gait variability reflects how gait parameters (e.g., stride time, stride length) change over many successive steps. Physiological variability appears in successive observations of physiological events such as the timing of breaths or heart beats. The study of variability in movements and physiological events has revealed systematic patterns of variability associated with both health and disease. Historically, variability was thought to be synonymous with error such as a faulty execution of an intended motor program [13], [14], [15]. Evidence supporting this view is the frequent observation that novices, older adults, and those with neurodegenerative diseases often produce greater variability than young, healthy, experts. From this point of view, variability is something to be reduced or eliminated. This perspective has become increasingly difficult to support given the growing evidence that structured variability is essential for a healthy, adaptive system [16], [17]. Elimination of variability introduces the possibility of a system that is inflexible in the face of novel circumstances. Novel circumstances are the rule in locomotion which involves an ever-changing environment. In contrast, optimal variability should strike a balance between complexity (i.e., behavioral richness) and predictability. Too much predictability leads to robotic movements; too little predictability leads to randomness. Both overly predictable and overly random behavior has been associated loss of adaptability associated with aging and disease.

A. Fractality in Human Movements

Human movements entail the coordination of many nested neuromuscular processes [12], [18], [19], [20], [21], [10], [17]. The successful interaction of the many components that make up such a system are reflected in the time varying properties (i.e., variability) observed in movement. Movement and physiological patterns represent a form of variability known as ”multifractality” that has been suggested to represent the coordination of motor degrees of freedom [12]. Fractals (aka monofractals) are geometric objects that are self-similar over different scales of analysis [21]. Fractals are observable from time series data (e.g., a sequence of stride times) by investigating how statistical properties (e.g., variance) change according to scale. When the logarithm of variance increases linearly with the logarithm of scale, the time series is said to exhibit fractal scaling. The slope that relates these quantities is the fractal scaling exponent, sometimes referred to as the Hurst exponent, H. Monofractal scaling suggests that single scaling exponent is sufficient for characterizing the dynamics of gait events. Furthermore, monofractal scaling does not in itself support the conclusion of interactions among the time scales that make up movement. Hence, this one-size fits all approach may not reflect the adaptability needed in human motor control. Multifractality, on the other hand, suggests that fractal patterns may be context dependent, changing to reflect the adaptive nature of the human neuromuscular system.

Despite exceptions [22], [23], [24], most work investigating fractal characteristics in human gait have been conducted from a monofractal perspective [25], [26], [4], [5]. Furthermore, although the influence of metronomes on monofractal properties of gait are well known [5], [4], [26], we are not aware of any studies that have systematically investigated the effect of metronomes on mulitfractal patterns observed in human gait. The current work addresses this gap in the literature while also providing critical information regarding the role of gait fractality in resilience to mechanical perturbations.

B. Metronomes as Assistive Devices to Prevent Falls

Auditory and visual metronomes have emerged as promising rehabilitation tools for restoring healthy motor patterns in many domains including stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and aging [27], [2], [4], [28], [29]. Pacing people with an isochronous metronomes seems to increase gait speed and stride length [29]. At issue, though, is that such studies often employ isochronous metronomes, which run contrary to known properties of human movement variability [5], [4], [26]. This is problematic because, while some studies show improvement in gait parameters using isochronous metronomes, other studies have shown that isochronous metronomes may actually alter healthy dynamics in such a way that mimics pathological gait variability [5], [4], [2]. In contrast, metronomes that exhibit properties found in healthy gait do not degrade healthy gait dynamics [4] and may have exert a restorative effect on gait patterns in older adults [30].

C. The current study

In this paper, we present a novel study that demonstrates metronomes may be effective in reducing the risk of falling due to an unexpected perturbation. Participants walked on a treadmill while either being paced by one of several metronome types or walking at a self-selected pace. During the trial, participants experienced a mechanical perturbation (a treadmill belt was briefly halted). We hypothesized that a metronome with statistical characteristics similar to those of healthy, self-paced walking would exhibit more resilience to perturbation as compared with other metronome types.

III. Methodology

A. Participants

Thirty-three healthy young adults (age: 19 – 30 years; height: 1.75 ± 0.91; weight: 71 ± 0.1 kg; 13 females, 20 males) participated in this study. All participants reported normal vision and hearing, and could walk for >= 45 consecutive minutes. Participants reported no neurological, movement or vestibular disorder, dizziness, impairments to vision or hearing, current musculoskeletal injury or pain. Participants had no cardiovascular events, had not experienced surgery within the previous 6 months, and were not pregnant. The institutional review board approved all procedures.

B. Experimental protocol

Walking trials took place on an instrumented, split belt treadmill (Bertec Corp., OH, USA). Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups, corresponding to each of the four metronome conditions; no metronome (or none), isochronous, random, and 1/f noise. Participants wore tight-fitting clothing and were fitted with a ceiling-mounted harness. We determined self-selected walking speed by increasing and decreasing treadmill speed until the participant reported that the speed was ‘faster than comfortable’ or ‘slower than comfortable’. We averaged the first three ‘faster’ and ‘slower’ to estimate a comfortable, self-selected speed and used that value for the duration of the session.

C. Baseline trial

Participants walked on the treadmill for 25 minutes at the self-selected walking speed but without a metronome. After the baseline trial, participants rested for 20 minutes. Right foot contact events from the last 3 minutes of the baseline trial were used to compute inter-stride intervals (ISIs; mean and SD) based on the trajectory of the vertical velocity of the left and right heel markers.

D. Stimuli creation

Baseline gait characteristics for each participant were used to construct 45 minute metronomes, appropriate to group, using MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA). Inter-beat (IBI) intervals for the isochronous condition were set to each participants’ mean baseline ISI. For the random condition, a random sequence of values between −1 and 1 was generated normalized baseline ISIs means and variances. 1/f noise time series were generated using custom MATLAB scaled in a manner similar to the random condition. Metronome intervals were converted to 4-beat drum patterns wherein beats were sounded by a closed hi-hat. A base drum and snare were played on the first and third beats, respectively. The bass drum signaled start of stride; the snare drum signaled contralateral limb foot contact. Stimuli were converted to MIDI sequences, and played by drum generator app (Drum Studio, Rollerchimp, Sydney, Australia). Participants in the metronome condition groups were asked to time their steps to beat of the metronome while walking. Before beginning experimental trials, participants demonstrated synchronizing their steps with beats. If initially unable to synchronize, researchers coached them and then participants practiced 2 additional minutes. Some participants required minor coaching but were all able to walk in time with the beat.

E. Perturbation trial

Thirty-nine retroreflective markers were affixed to anatomical landmarks to define a nine-segment (left and right foot, left and right shank, left and right thigh, pelvis, trunk, head) mechanical model of the human body. Clusters of rigid reflective markers were also placed on the thigh and lower leg. Participants walked for 45-minute in one of three metronome conditions (1/f noise, random, or isochronous) or at a self-selected speed. Metronome beats were played speakers at the same volume for all conditions. Twenty-five minutes into the trial, we halted one treadmill belt for 500ms, providing a mechanical perturbation meant to approximate a trip. The perturbation was timed to when the ankle of the dominant limb in swing passed the ankle of the support limb. Treadmill acceleration and deceleration was set to 3 ms-2. Participants were asked to resume walking after the normal belt movement resumed. The trial continued for 20 more minutes. Kinematic data was recorded at 100 Hz using an 8-camera, 3D motion capture system (Vicon Motion Systems, Oxford, UK). The timing and duration of the treadmill perturbation were controlled by D-Flow (Motek Medical BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Participants only received a single perturbation to prevent learning effects. Participants were naive to the trip.

F. Analysis

Periods before (PRE) and after the perturbation (POST) were identified from the 45 minutes walking trials and the foot contact events were estimated based on the trajectory of the vertical velocity of the right heel marker using custom Matlab code. Foot contact events were also identified from the 25 minute baseline trial. ISIs were calculated as the time elapsed between subsequent heel strike events of the same foot.

After extraction, ISIs were used as input to a time series method called Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (MFDFA) [31]. MFDFA is a generalization of well known Detrended Flucatuation Analysis [32] and has been used in numerous disciplines to study the correlation structure of time series data, including relevant areas such as physiology and movement science [25], [26], [4], [5], [21], [19], [20]. See [18], [33] for tutorials on this and related methods. We used MFDFA to characterize the time-varying properties of gait at baseline and during each experimental task segment (PRE/POST perturbation). Kantelhardt et al. [31] describe MFDFA as an algorithm involving five steps.

  • Step 1 involves determining the profile as the cumulative sum of a mean-detrended time series according to
    Y(i)=k=1i(xkx¯),i=1,,N
    where N is the length of the series, xk, and x¯ is mean of xk.
  • Step 2 requires dividing Y (i) into int(N/s) non-overlapping segments of length s. Because N will not always be a multiple of s, the procedure is repeated twice, once from each end of Y (i) to avoid dropping data. This results in 2Ns segments.

  • Step 3 calculates local trends in each of the Ns segments by ordinary least squares regression. The variance is then estimated as:
    F2(υ,s)=1si=1s{Y[(υ1)s+i]yυ(i)}2
    for each segment, υ, υ = 1,…,Ns and
    F2(υ,s)=1si=1s{Y[N(υNs)s+i]yυ(i)}2
    for υ = Ns + 1, …2Ns. yυ(i) is the local trend determined by OLS regression. Here, yυ (i) is assumed to be a first order polynomial, but higher order polynomials may also be used[31].
  • Step 4 entails estimating the qth order fluctuation function by averaging over all 2Ns segments according to
    Fq(s)={12Nsυ=12Ns[F2(υ,s)]q2}1q
    where q is a real number. When q = 2, the procedure reduces to the standard DFA[32] procedure. Steps 2 through 4 are repeated for several values of s where sm + 2, where m is polynomial order of yυ(i). In the current work, we used smin = 16 and q = −10, −9, …10.
  • Step 5 identifies the scaling behavior of Fq(s) by regressing its logarithm against the logarithm of s. If the time series exhibits long range correlation, then Fq(s) increases like a power law as a function of s, Fq(s) sh(q), where the generalized Hurst exponent, h(q) is the slope of the log-log plot of Fq(s) and s. In the case of of multifractality, the collection of slopes, h(q) will not be equal for all q. When s is large, only a few values are included in calculation of Fq(s). Hence, by convention, we chose smax = N/4 for the current analysis. Lastly, h(q) as q tends toward 0, so h(0) is estimated according to:
    F0(s)=exp14Nsυ=12Nsln[F2(υ,s)]=sh(0).

    Other scaling exponents may be calculated based on h(q). See [31] for details.

After extracting h(q) by applying MFDFA to each ISI time series, h(q) were analyzed via linear mixed effect models (LMEs). Models were fit using forward selection of parameters starting with fixed effects, adding higher order interactions one at time. Model terms were retained based on significant likelihood ratio tests.

IV. Evaluation

LME results are presented as an analysis of variance in Table I. That table indicates that all main effects and interactions were significant. Main effects and two-way interactions are not interpreted further because their implication in a three-way interaction among time, group, and q-order.

TABLE I:

Type III Analysis of Variance Table adjusted with Kenward-Rogers method. Results suggest a three-way interaction among q-order (q), group (g), and time (t). All p < .01

SS MS DF1 DF2 F
q 5.48 5.48 1.00 1879.60 268.53
g 1.68 0.56 3.00 27.61 27.48
t 22.81 11.40 2.00 1887.16 558.63
q×g 0.73 0.24 3.00 1879.60 11.87
q×t 0.22 0.11 2.00 1879.60 5.46
g×t 30.79 5.13 6.00 1886.43 251.36
q×g×t 1.57 0.26 6.00 1879.60 12.83

Model implied means depicted in Figure 1 help visualize this interaction. Several general trends seem apparent. First, random and isochronous metronomes reduced the central tendency of h(q). On average, h(q) was lower in those conditions than the none or 1/f conditions, replicating known trends in the literature[4]. Second, the range of h(q) appears larger when paced by a 1/f metronome than either a random or isochronous metronome. To investigate the influence of group and time on h(q), we performed a series of simple effects tests at extreme values of q included in the MFDFA procedure i.e., (−10,10). These tests are presented in Table II. When q = −10, small fluctuations dominate the estimation of fractal scaling. In that case, the none condition did not vary across time. However, large decreases in h(q) were observed in the isochronous and random conditions, pre- and post-perturbation relative to the baseline. In contrast, the 1/f condition increased h(q) relative to baseline. Only the 1/f condition showed a pre-post decline in h(q), possibly due to floor effects in the other two conditions. When q = 10, large fluctuations dominate the estimation of fractal scaling. In this case, all conditions showed differences in scaling behavior relative to baseline. However, only the none and isochronous conditions showed differences between pre- and post-perturbation.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Generalized Hurst exponent, h(q), as a function of time and group.

TABLE II:

Pairwise comparisons of h(q) as a function of time and group at extreme values of q.

contrast estimate SE df t p
group = None, q = −10
base - pre 0.02 0.03 1882.06 0.63 0.806
base - post 0.03 0.03 1882.06 1.01 0.569
pre - post 0.01 0.03 1880.01 0.40 0.916

group = Isoch., q = −10
base - pre 0.65 0.03 1880.01 20.36 <.001
base - post 0.71 0.03 1880.01 22.11 <.001
pre - post 0.06 0.03 1880.01 1.76 0.185

group = 1/f, q = −10
base - pre −0.20 0.03 1888.66 −5.85 <.001
base - post −0.09 0.03 1888.66 −2.80 0.0143
pre - post 0.10 0.03 1880.01 2.97 0.009

group = Rand., q = −10
base - pre 0.29 0.03 1882.06 9.75 <.001
base - post 0.33 0.03 1882.06 11.14 <.001
pre - post 0.04 0.03 1880.01 1.44 0.321

group = None, q = 10
base - pre −0.18 0.03 1882.06 −5.97 <.001
base - post −0.07 0.03 1882.06 −2.53 0.031
pre - post 0.10 0.03 1880.01 3.56 0.001

group = Isoch., q = 10
base - pre 0.64 0.03 1880.01 19.96 <.001
base - post 0.53 0.03 1880.01 16.39 <.001
pre - post −0.11 0.03 1880.01 −3.57 0.001

group = 1/f, q = 10
base - pre 0.20 0.03 1888.66 5.85 <.001
base - post 0.15 0.03 1888.66 4.44 <.001
pre - post −0.05 0.03 1880.01 −1.37 0.354

group = Rand., q = 10
base - pre 0.41 0.03 1882.06 13.97 <.001
base - post 0.39 0.03 1882.06 13.27 <.001
pre - post −0.02 0.03 1880.01 −0.72 0.752

Degrees-of-freedom method: kenward-roger

P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates

To understand the influence of various metronomes and a mechanical perturbation on gait variability, we investigated how the slope relating q and h(q) changed according to time and group. These results are presented in Table III. A general finding is that the q × h(q) slope differed between baseline and pre-perturbation for all conditions except the isochronous condition. In addition, the q × h(q) slope differed between baseline and post for the isochronous and 1/f conditions. Lastly, the pre-post differences in the q × h(q) slopes were only observed in the isochronous and 1/f conditions.

TABLE III:

Analysis of q × h(q) slopes as a function of time and group.

contrast estimate SE df t p
g = NONE
base - pre −0.01 0.00 1880.01 −3.87 0.0003
base - post −0.01 0.00 1880.01 −2.08 0.0944
pre - post 0.00 0.00 1880.01 1.84 0.1556

g = Isoch.
base - pre −0.00 0.00 1880.01 −0.23 0.9716
base - post −0.01 0.00 1880.01 −3.34 0.0024
pre - post −0.01 0.00 1880.01 −3.11 0.0053

g = 1/f
base - pre 0.02 0.00 1880.01 6.90 <.0001
base - post 0.01 0.00 1880.01 4.27 0.0001
pre - post −0.01 0.00 1880.01 −2.54 0.0300

g = Rand.
base - pre 0.01 0.00 1880.01 2.47 0.0359
base - post 0.00 0.00 1880.01 1.25 0.4238
pre - post −0.00 0.00 1880.01 −1.26 0.4173

Degrees-of-freedom method: kenward-roger

P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates

Collectively, these results emphasize a few key points related to the effects of various metronome types and fractal scaling in ISIs. First, the results echo previous observations suggesting isochronous and random metronomes produce gait patterns more consistent with pathology than with healthy gait [5], [4], [26]. Second, the results while not entirely consistent, suggest that metronomes exert a profound effect over gait fractality, affecting the scaling properties of both small and large fluctuations, alike. The slope analysis was limited to extreme values of q, but fluctuations of intermediate size would likewise have been affected. Third, and surprisingly, our results did not produce a consistent pre-post perturbation effect with respect to either the central tendency of h(q) or the q × h(q) slopes. There are several possible explanations. Some conditions (e.g, random condition) could have produced a floor effect, preventing successful reorganization of motor degrees of freedom to be detectable post-perturbation. This is consistent with our hypothesis concerning 1/f noise where measurable pre-post perturbation effects were observed. Another possibility is that post-perturbation series were too long. MFDFA requires time series to be quite long to obtain stable estimates. Then post-perturbation analysis may have included too many strides after recovery to capture nuanced perturbation effects. Future research should explore the use of a modified MFDFA procedure better suited for ‘shor’ time series.

The results reported above are promising but not without limitation. Our study used a treadmill for the walking trials, implying results may not generalize to overground walking in natural settings, as other researchers have noted differences in gait dynamics when comparing overground and treadmill gait dynamics [34]. Members of our research team have shown that the effects of irregular metronomes on monofractal properties of gait do translate overground waking [4], [2]. Hence, there is good reason to suspect that multifractal results will also generalize to more natural settings.

V. Next-Generation Networked Metronomes

In this section, we describe directions for building the next generation of metronomes, featuring advanced networking capabilities in conjunction with technologies, such as Augmented Reality (AR), to provide an immersive and interactive quality of experience to participants [35].

A. Smart Phone Metronome Applications

A direction for the implementation of gait metronomes nowadays is through smart phone applications. Such applications will be installed on the research participants’ phones, while parameters, such as the type and frequency of the auditory beat, can be adjusted as input parameters of the applications. Such metronomes enable flexible mobility opportunities, so that experiments can be performed outside of laboratory spaces in daily living contexts (e.g., walking on a university campus, working out at a park). This is particularly important because laboratories may restrict the flexibility of the performed experiments (e.g., treadmills constrain participants to walk on fixed directions). on the other hand, daily living contexts can offer insights to habitual behaviors, which may not be feasible in laboratory spaces.

B. Augmented Reality and “Gamified” Metronomes

So far, we have focused on auditory gait metronomes. The auditory stimuli is discreet and limited. To this end, gait metronomes can be augmented with visual effects, so that they provide visual (continuous) stimuli, offering new opportunities for gait-related research. In Figure 2, we present a prototype of a visual metronome. This metronome is implemented through a pair of glasses participants wear. These glasses are powered and are directly connected to a tablet device. The stimuli are visualized through a bar that moves vertically. When the bar reaches its highest point, the participants are instructed to touch the ground with their feet as they are taking a step.

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Prototype of visual metronome. A moving bar depicted on right hand side is displayed on a video screen mounted to a non-prescription pair of glasses.

This visual metronome prototype, however, requires that participants carry a tablet device with them while walking. Technologies to connect the glasses wirelessly (e.g., Bluetooth, WiFi) to the tablet may be useful, however, still such glasses have limited capabilities in terms of graphics. A direction that is worthy of exploring is the integration of AR to provide immersive graphical experience that enhances the research participant’s perception of the world. In Figure 3, we present an early prototype of an AR-based metronome that we implemented based on Unity. We have deployed this prototype on a Hololens 2 headset. This metronome is a direct conversion of the metronome of Figure 3 to an AR environment.

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Prototype of a AR-capable metronome developed based on Unity and deployed on a Hololens 2 headset.

Leveraging AR, a direction to explore is “gamifying” gait metronomes in order to provide interactive, gaming-like experiences to research participants. For example, participants may be instructed to synchronize their steps with visual targets (e.g., collide with 3D bulls-eye objects). As another example, participants may step on 3D tiles of a certain color or shape that the AR headset projects on the floor. At the same time, participants can receive real-time feedback about their performance in this gaming experience (e.g., through messages displayed on the headset’s screen), being: (i) encouraged to step on 3D bulls-eye objects or certain 3D tiles if they do not follow the instructions of the game; and (ii) praised for their performance if they follow the instructions of the game.

C. Cloud and Edge Computing Technologies

Gait metronomes coupled with wireless capabilities and potentially based on AR may need to utilize remote computing resources for computationally expensive operations (e.g., 3D rendering, object detection), especially, if the metronomes are battery powered with limited computing resources. Cloud computing technologies could facilitate the execution of computationally expensive operations on remote computing resources. However, cloud computing resources may result in high response times, which can be problematic in cases of low-latency applications, such as interactive AR. To this end, edge computing [36] has emerged as a paradigm that features computing resources physically close to users (at the edge of the network), subsequently resulting in fast response times.

Edge computing solutions open opportunities for future computer networking research. Such opportunities include mechanisms for the allocation and discovery of computing resources at the edge [37], [38], as well as the dynamic offloading of computational tasks at the edge [39]. For example, if multiple edge servers are available, we may need consecutive computational tasks to be offloaded to the same edge server. This is due to the fact that the processing of these tasks may determine whether a participant follows the provided instructions (e.g., whether the participant is stepping on projected 3D tiles of the right color) not only momentarily, but over a certain period of time. The processing outcome of such tasks will subsequently determine the feedback to be provided to the participant (e.g., the message to be displayed on the headset’s screen). In addition, mechanisms for in-network computing coupled with advanced wireless capabilities (e.g., LTE/5G) could further increase the available bandwidth and reduce response times [40], [41].

VI. Conclusion and Future Work

We have presented a preliminary study on the utility of different metronomes as assistive devices. Our results showed that, when followed by healthy adults, metronomes typically used for rehabilitation (i.e., isochronous metronomes) produce gait patterns more consistent with pathological gait than typical walking. In contrast, metronomes based on healthy gait patterns left those patterns unperturbed, even after experiencing a mechanical perturbation. Lastly, we provided plans for enhancing assistive metronomes through advanced networking and computing technologies as well as augmented reality. Our vision is that these technologies will advance these tools through graphics, faster calculations, and more freedom of use. Our goal is to increase the efficacy of metronomic rehabilitation tools by: (1) using metronomes that consider the natural regularities in healthy gait, (2) improving experience in a range of settings. Ultimately, these improvements may encourage broader use of these tools and prevent falls.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS/P20GM109090), the National Science Foundation under award 2016714, and the University of Nebraska Collaboration Initiative.

References

  • [1].Cubo E, Leurgans S, and Goetz CG, “Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’state: randomized single blind evaluation,” Parkinsonism & related disorders, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 507–510, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Vaz JR, Knarr BA, and Stergiou N, “Gait complexity is acutely restored in older adults when walking to a fractal-like visual stimulus,” Human Movement Science, vol. 74, p. 102677, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Kim JH and Ridgel AL, “Effects of interactive metronome and golf swing mechanics training on technique and motor timing in professional and amateur golfers,” International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 786–797, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hunt N, McGrath D, and Stergiou N, “The influence of auditory-motor coupling on fractal dynamics in human gait,” Scientific reports, vol. 4, p. 5879, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kaipust JP, McGrath D, Mukherjee M, and Stergiou N, “Gait variability is altered in older adults when listening to auditory stimuli with differing temporal structures,” Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1595–1603, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Aks DJ, Zelinsky GJ, and Sprott JC, “Memory across eye-movements: 1/f dynamic in visual search,” Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1–25, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Stergiou N and Decker LM, “Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: Is there a connection?” Human Movement Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 869–888, October 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Peng CK, Havlin S, Hausdorff JM, Mietus JE, Stanley HE, and Goldberger AL, “Fractal mechanisms and heart rate dynamics: long-range correlations and their breakdown with disease,” Journal of electrocardiology, vol. 28, p. 59–65, 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Peng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, and Goldberger AL, “Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 82–87, March 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Ivanov PC, Nunes Amaral LA, Goldberger AL, Havlin S, Rosenblum MG, Stanley HE, and Struzik ZR, “From 1/f noise to multifractal cascades in heartbeat dynamics,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 641–652, August 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Kello CT, Brown GD, Ferrer-i Cancho R, Holden JG, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Rhodes T, and Van Orden GC, “Scaling laws in cognitive sciences,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 223–232, May 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Cavanaugh JT, Kelty-Stephen DG, and Stergiou N, “Multifractality, interactivity, and the adaptive capacity of the human movement system: A perspective for advancing the conceptual basis of neurologic physical therapy,” Journal of neurologic physical therapy: JNPT, vol. 41, no. 4, p. 245, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Fitts PM, “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.” Journal of experimental psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, p. 381, 1954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Reason JT, Human error. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Schmidt RA, “Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory,” Research quarterly for exercise and sport, vol. 74, no. 4, p. 366–375, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Stergiou N, Harbourne RT, and Cavanaugh JT, “Optimal movement variability: A new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy,” Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 120, September 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Harrison SJ and Stergiou N, “Complex adaptive behavior and dexterous action,” Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 345, 2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kelty-Stephen DG, Palatinus K, Saltzman E, and Dixon JA, “A tutorial on multifractality, cascades, and interactivity for empirical time series in ecological science,” Ecological Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–62, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Likens AD, Amazeen PG, Stevens R, Galloway T, and Gorman JC, “Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis,” Social neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 219–234, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Likens AD, Fine JM, Amazeen EL, and Amazeen PG, “Experimental control of scaling behavior: what is not fractal?” Experimental brain research, vol. 233, no. 10, p. 2813–2821, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Peng C-K, and Stanley HE, “Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. suppl 1, pp. 2466–2472, February 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Ashkenazy Y, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, and Stanley HE, “A stochastic model of human gait dynamics,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 316, no. 1-4, pp. 662–670, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Dutta S, Ghosh D, and Chatterjee S, “Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of human gait diseases,” Frontiers in physiology, vol. 4, p. 274, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].West BJ and Scafetta N, “A multifractal dynamical model of human gait,” in Fractals in biology and medicine. Springer, 2005, pp. 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Hausdorff JM, Peng CK, Ladin Z, Wei JY, and Goldberger AL, “Is walking a random walk? evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 349–358, January 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Hausdorff JM, Purdon PL, Peng C-K, Ladin Z, Wei JY, and Goldberger AL, “Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations,” Journal of applied physiology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1448–1457, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Hollands KL, Pelton TA, Wimperis A, Whitham D, Tan W, Jowett S, Sackley CM, Wing AM, Tyson SF, Mathias J et al. , “Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of visual cue training to improve adaptability of walking after stroke: multi-centre, single-blind randomised control pilot trial,” PloS one, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e0139261, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Baker K, Rochester L, and Nieuwboer A, “The effect of cues on gait variability—reducing the attentional cost of walking in people with parkinson’s disease,” Parkinsonism & related disorders, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 314–320, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Spaulding SJ, Barber B, Colby M, Cormack B, Mick T, and Jenkins ME, “Cueing and gait improvement among people with parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 562–570, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].van Ooijen MW, Roerdink M, Trekop M, Janssen TW, and Beek PJ, “The efficacy of treadmill training with and without projected visual context for improving walking ability and reducing fall incidence and fear of falling in older adults with fall-related hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial,” BMC geriatrics, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 215, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Kantelhardt JW, Zschiegner SA, Koscielny-Bunde E, Havlin S, Bunde A, and Stanley HE, “Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 316, no. 1-4, pp. 87–114, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Peng C-K, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Simons M, Stanley HE, and Goldberger AL, “Mosaic organization of dna nucleotides,” Physical review e, vol. 49, no. 2, p. 1685, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Ihlen EAFE, “Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in matlab,” Frontiers in physiology, vol. 3, p. 141, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Terrier P and Dériaz O, “Kinematic variability, fractal dynamics and local dynamic stability of treadmill walking,” Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 12, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Shannigrahi S, Mastorakis S, and Ortega FR, “Next-generation networking and edge computing for mixed reality real-time interactive systems,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), IEEE, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Shi W, Cao J, Zhang Q, Li Y, and Xu L, “Edge computing: Vision and challenges,” IEEE internet of things journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Mastorakis S and Mtibaa A, “Towards service discovery and invocation in data-centric edge networks,” in 2019 IEEE 27th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Mastorakis S, Zhong X, Huang P-C, and Tourani R, “Dlwiot: Deep learning-based watermarking for authorized iot onboarding,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10334, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Mastorakis S, Mtibaa A, Lee J, and Misra S, “Icedge: When edge computing meets information-centric networking,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 4203–4217, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Nour B, Mastorakis S, and Mtibaa A, “Compute-less networking: Perspectives, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Network, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Ullah R, Rehman MAU, Naeem MA, Kim B-S, and Mastorakis S, “Icn with edge for 5g: Exploiting in-network caching in icn-based edge computing for 5g networks,” Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES