Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Reprod Immunol. 2019 Sep 20;82(6):e13184. doi: 10.1111/aji.13184

Gasdermin D: Evidence of Pyroptosis in Spontaneous Preterm Labor with Sterile Intra-amniotic Inflammation or Intra-amniotic Infection

Nardhy Gomez-Lopez 1,2,3, Roberto Romero 1,4,5,6, Adi L Tarca 1,2, Derek Miller 1,2, Bogdan Panaitescu 1,2, George Schwenkel 1,2, Dereje W Gudicha 1,2, Sonia S Hassan 1,2,7, Percy Pacora 1,2, Eunjung Jung 1,2, Chaur-Dong Hsu 1,2,7
PMCID: PMC8341322  NIHMSID: NIHMS1722741  PMID: 31461796

Abstract

Problem:

Pyroptosis, inflammatory programmed cell death, is initiated through the inflammasome and relies on the pore-forming actions of the effector molecule gasdermin D. Herein, we investigated whether gasdermin D is detected in women with spontaneous preterm labor and sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection.

Method of study:

Amniotic fluid samples (n = 124) from women with spontaneous preterm labor were subdivided into the following groups: 1) those who delivered at term (n = 32); and those who delivered preterm 2) without intra-amniotic inflammation (n = 41), 3) with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (n = 32), or 4) with intra-amniotic infection (n = 19), based on amniotic fluid IL-6 concentrations and microbiological status of amniotic fluid (culture and PCR/ESI-MS). Gasdermin D concentrations were measured using an ELISA kit. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was also performed to determine the expression of gasdermin D, caspase-1, and interleukin-1β in the chorioamniotic membranes. Detection of pyroptosis (active caspase-1) in decidual cells from women with preterm labor and birth was performed using flow cytometry.

Results:

1) Gasdermin D was detected in the amniotic fluid and chorioamniotic membranes from women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor/birth with either sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection, but was rarely detected in those without intra-amniotic inflammation. 2) Amniotic fluid concentrations of gasdermin D were higher in women with intra-amniotic infection than in those with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, and its expression in the chorioamniotic membranes was associated with caspase-1 and IL-1β (inflammasome mediators). 3) Decidual stromal cells and leukocytes isolated from women with preterm labor and birth are capable of undergoing pyroptosis since they expressed active caspase-1.

Conclusions:

Pyroptosis can occur in the context of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation and intra-amniotic infection in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth.

Keywords: amniotic fluid, chorioamniotic membranes, caspase-1, interleukin-1beta, inflammasome, parturition, pregnancy, prematurity, fetal inflammatory response, funisitis, chorioamnionitis, microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity

INTRODUCTION

Preterm birth, the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide 1-3, is often preceded by spontaneous preterm labor 4-8, a syndrome of multiple etiologies 9. Among the proposed causes of preterm labor, intra-amniotic inflammation represents the only causal link to preterm birth 10-22. Intra-amniotic inflammation can result from microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, referred to as intra-amniotic infection (IAI), or can occur in the absence of detectable microorganisms using both culture and molecular microbiological techniques, known as sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (SIAI) 23-27. Such an inflammatory process is commonly observed in women with preterm labor and intact membranes 24, those with an asymptomatic short cervix 25, and those with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes 27. Indeed, we have provided solid evidence indicating that alarmins (i.e. molecules that trigger sterile inflammation 28-30) are associated with intra-amniotic inflammation and preterm labor and birth 31-36. In addition, systemic 37,38 or intra-amniotic 39,40 administration of alarmins induces preterm labor and birth in mice. The mechanisms whereby alarmins and microbes induce such inflammation involve the inflammasome 40-50.

The inflammasome is a cytoplasmic multi-subunit protein complex that, once assembled, catalyzes the activation of caspase-1 51-69 and the consequent release of the mature forms of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and/or IL-18 70-78. At the cellular level, the end result of inflammasome activation is pyroptosis, an inflammatory type of programmed cell death that is characterized by the uncontrolled release of cytosolic contents 79-82. A primary effector molecule of pyroptosis is gasdermin D, a protein that is cleaved by the active forms of caspase-1 and caspase-11 83,84. Once cleaved into its active fragments, gasdermin D forms pores in the cell membrane 85-88, inducing pyroptotic cell death and allowing the release of cytosolic proteins, including inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β 80,85. Importantly, cleaved gasdermin D is also released into the extracellular space 89. Thus, gasdermin D is an important component of inflammasome activation-induced pathological inflammation and its detection in biological fluids can serve as an in vivo readout of pyroptosis. Although we have shown that inflammasome activation occurs during the pathological inflammatory process of preterm labor 40,44,46,47, no evidence implicating pyroptosis has been generated. Herein, we investigated whether spontaneous preterm labor in the setting of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection is accompanied by an increase in gasdermin D concentrations as an in vivo indicator of pyroptosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

This is a cross-sectional study that included the following patients: (1) women with spontaneous preterm labor that delivered at term with a negative amniotic fluid culture and an IL-6 concentration <2.6 ng/mL (n = 32); (2) women with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered preterm without IAI or SIAI (n = 41); (3) women with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered preterm with SIAI (n = 32); and (4) women with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered preterm with IAI (n = 19) (see diagnostic criteria below). Chorioamniotic membranes samples from women in each of the study groups were also studied using multiplex immunofluorescence and phenoptics. Decidua tissues (decidua parietalis attached to the chorioamniotic membranes) from women with preterm labor were used for the detection of active caspase-1 by flow cytometry (n = 5). Women with multiple gestations or those who had fetuses affected with chromosomal and/or sonographic abnormalities were excluded. Maternal and neonatal data were obtained by retrospective clinical chart review. Amniotic fluid samples were retrieved from the bank of biological specimens at the Perinatology Research Branch of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Detroit, Michigan. All women provided written informed consent prior to the collection of samples, and the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University and the NICHD approved the collection and use of materials and clinical data for research purposes.

Clinical definitions

Gestational age was determined by the last menstrual period and confirmed by ultrasound examination or by ultrasound examination alone if the sonographic determination of gestational age was inconsistent with menstrual dating by more than 1 week. Spontaneous preterm labor was defined as the presence of regular uterine contractions with a frequency of at least 2 every 10 min and cervical changes between 20 and 36 (6/7) weeks of gestation. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) was defined as a positive amniotic fluid culture and/or a polymerase chain reaction with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) (Ibis® Technology—Athogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) test result 23,90-93. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration ≥2.6ng/mL 94-98. SIAI was defined as an amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration ≥2.6ng/mL 94 without microorganisms detected by culture or PCR/ESI-MS 23-27. IAI (or microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation) was defined as the presence of MIAC with intra-amniotic inflammation 23-27,99-101. Neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were determined using previously established criteria 102-104. Acute histologic chorioamnionitis and acute funisitis were diagnosed according to established criteria 105-107.

Amniotic fluid sample collection

Amniotic fluid samples were obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis under antiseptic conditions and monitored by ultrasound. Transabdominal amniocentesis was performed for the detection of intra-amniotic inflammation and/or infection. Samples of amniotic fluid were transported to the laboratory in a sterile capped syringe and centrifuged at 1,300 X g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was stored at −80°C until use. A portion of this amniotic fluid was also transported to the clinical laboratory for culture of aerobic/anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas. The clinical tests also included the determination of amniotic fluid white blood cell count 108, glucose concentration 109, Gram stain 110, and IL-6 concentration 94,111.

Placental histopathological evaluation

Placentas were examined histologically by perinatal pathologists blinded to clinical diagnoses and obstetrical outcomes. Briefly, three to nine sections of the placenta were examined, and at least one full-thickness section was taken from the center of the placenta; other sections were taken randomly from the placental disc. Acute and chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta (maternal inflammatory response and fetal inflammatory response) were diagnosed according to established criteria, including staging and grading105-107,112,113.

Determination of gasdermin D concentrations in the amniotic fluid

Concentrations of gasdermin D in amniotic fluid samples were determined by using a sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit obtained from MyBioSource (Cat#MBS9338251; San Diego, CA, USA). This ELISA kit was initially validated in our laboratory prior to the execution of this study. Amniotic fluid concentrations of gasdermin D were obtained by interpolation from the standard curve. The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 12.757% and 11.249%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.249 ng/mL.

Multiplex immunofluorescence and phenoptics

Five-μm-thick sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded chorioamniotic membranes (amnion and choriodecidua) of patients from our study groups were cut and mounted on SuperFrost Plus microscope slides. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was performed using the Opal 7 kit (Cat#NEL811001KT; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Prior to multiplex immunofluorescence staining, each analyte was individually optimized with single antibody staining combined with different fluorescent TSA® reagents (PerkinElmer). After deparaffinization, slides were placed in antigen retrieval (AR) buffer and boiled using a microwave oven. Following blocking to eliminate nonspecific binding, slides were incubated with antibodies against gasdermin D (Cat#20770-1-AP; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), caspase-1 (CAT#MA5-16215; Invitrogen, Rockford, IL), or IL-1β (Cat#NBP1-19775; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO) at room temperature. The slides were then washed and incubated with Opal Polymer HRP Ms+Rb (Cat#ARH1001EA; PerkinElmer). Next, the slides were incubated with one of the following fluorescent TSA® reagents included in the Opal 7 kit to detect each antibody staining: Opal 520, Opal 570, or Opal 690 (dilution 1:100). After washing, the slides were counterstained with Spectral DAPI (Cat#FP1490; PerkinElmer) and mounted using ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR). Autofluorescence slides as well as slides stained with isotype (negative controls) were included. Multiplex staining was performed by consecutively staining slide-mounted tissues using the same antibody concentrations and conditions validated through singleplex staining. Each previous primary and secondary antibody was removed by boiling in AR buffer before the application of the next primary antibody. After multiplex staining, the slides were imaged using the Vectra Polaris Multispectral Imaging System (PerkinElmer) and images were analyzed and converted to immunohistochemistry view using the InForm 2.4.1 image analysis software (PerkinElmer).

Determination of active caspase-1 in decidual cells using flow cytometry

Decidual cells were isolated from the decidua parietalis as previously described 114, with minor modifications. Briefly, the decidua parietalis was separated from the chorioamniotic membranes, and the decidual tissues were homogenized using a gentleMACS Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, USA) in StemPro Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Homogenized tissues were incubated for 45 min at 37°C with gentle agitation. After incubation, tissues were washed in sterile 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies) and filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer (Falcon, Corning Life Sciences Inc., Durham, NC, USA). The resulting cell suspension was centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min at 4°C, resuspended in 5 mL of 1X PBS, and gently layered over 5 mL of Polymorphprep (Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA). The cell suspension/Polymorphprep gradient was then centrifuged at 500 x g and 4°C for 30 min, after which the mononuclear cell layer was carefully pipetted into a clean tube and washed in 1X PBS at 300 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were then resuspended in 100 μL of stain buffer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and the following extracellular fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal anti-human antibodies were added to the cell suspension: CD45-AlexaFluor700 (clone H130, cat# 560566, BD Biosciences), CD15-BV650 (clone H198, cat# 564232, BD Biosciences), CD14-BV605 (clone M5E2, cat# 301833, BioLegend), CD3-APC-Cy7 (clone SK7, cat#557832, BD Biosciences), and CD19-PE-Cy5 (clone HIB19, cat# 555414, BD Biosciences). The cells were then incubated at 4°C for 30 min in the dark and washed in stain buffer at 300 x g for 10 min to remove excess antibody, followed by a second wash in 1X PBS. The cells were resuspended in 290 μL of 1X PBS and immediately used for intracellular active caspase-1 staining.

Detection of active caspase-1 to determine pyroptosis was performed using the FAM-FLICA Caspase-1 Assay Kit (cat# 97, ImmunoChemistry Technologies, Bloomington, MN, USA), following the manufacturers’ instructions. Briefly, a 30X FAM-FLICA solution was prepared in 1X PBS and 10 μL of the prepared solution were added to the cell suspension. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min followed by two washes in 1X apoptosis wash buffer (ImmunoChemistry Technologies) at 300 x g for 10 min. After the second wash, red blood cell lysis was performed by resuspending the cells in 1 mL of 0.8% ammonium chloride solution (STEMCELL Technologies, Cambridge, MA, USA) and incubating the cells for 5 min at 37°C. The cell suspension was then washed in stain buffer at 300 x g for 10 min and resuspended in 0.5 mL of stain buffer. Finally, immediately prior to flow cytometer acquisition, 1 μL of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (1 μg/mL, cat# D9542, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to the cell suspension. The cells were acquired using the BD LSRFortessa Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and BD FACSDiva 6.0 software (BD Biosciences). The analysis and figures were performed using FlowJo software version 10 (FlowJo, LLC, Ashland, OR, USA). Active caspase-1 and DAPI-positive cells were considered to be pyroptotic.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 19.0 software (IBM Corporation; Armonk, NY, USA) and R statistical language and environment (www.r-project.org). For patient demographics, the Fisher’s exact test was used to compare proportions between groups and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparing continuous variables between groups. To determine the association between amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations and the presence of SIAI or IAI, the number of women with an amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentration above the limit of detection (LOD, 0.249 ng/mL) was determined for each study group. The associations between amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations > 0.249 ng/mL and the presence of SIAI or IAI were determined using a Chi-square test for proportions, with relative risk estimates and p-values obtained using the epiR package in R. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was also used to compare gasdermin D concentrations between the two groups in which concentrations were above the detection limit for a majority of patients. Statistical analyses for gasdermin D included adjustment for gestational age at sampling. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study population

Amniotic fluid samples from 124 patients with spontaneous preterm labor were included in this study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 1. Neonates whose mother had spontaneous preterm labor and delivered preterm with either SIAI or IAI had lower median birthweights and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes compared to the other study groups (Table 1). The prevalence of acute histological chorioamnionitis and acute funisitis was both significantly different among the study groups, with the highest frequency occurring in patients with spontaneous preterm labor that delivered preterm with SIAI or IAI (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population

Patients with
preterm labor who
delivered at term
(n = 32)
Patients with preterm labor who delivered preterm P-value
Without intra-amniotic
inflammation or
infection
(n = 41)
With sterile intra-
amniotic
inflammation
(n = 32)
With intra-amniotic
infection
(n = 19)
Maternal age (years; median [IQR])a 23 (20.8-25) 23 (20-26) 24 (20-28) 23 (20-26) 0.6
Body mass index (kg/m2; median [IQR])a 21.6 (19.8-29.5)c 24.2 (20.8-28.8)c 27.5 (23-33.3)c 24.4 (21.5-32.8)c 0.1
Primiparityb 18.8% (6/32) 29.3% (12/41) 31.3% (10/32) 21.1% (4/19) 0.6
Raceb 0.8
  African-American 96.9% (31/32) 85.4% (35/41) 87.5% (28/32) 94.7% (18/19)
  Caucasian 0% (0/32) 7.3% (3/41) 6.3% (2/32) 5.3% (1/19)
  Hispanic 0% (0/32) 4.9% (2/41) 3.1% (1/32) 0% (0/19)
  Other 3.1% (1/32) 2.4% (1/41) 3.1% (1/32) 0% (0/19)
Gestational age at amniocentesis (weeks; median [IQR])a 31.4 (30.4-32.9) 31.4 (27-32.7) 25.2 (23.3-29.9) 28 (23.1-31.5) <0.001
Gestational age at delivery (weeks; median [IQR])a 38.7 (37.4-39.4) 34.3 (32.1-36) 26.1 (24.3-31.1) 28.1 (23.1-32.4) <0.001
Birthweight (g)a 3072.5 (2900-3388.8) 2260 (1612.5-2491.3)c 849 (565-1530) 1120 (560.5-1980) <0.001
Apgar score at 1 mina 9 (8-9) 8 (7-9)c 5.5 (2-8) 4 (1.5-7.5) <0.001
Apgar score at 5 mina 9 (9-9) 9 (8-9)c 7 (5.8-9) 7 (2.5-8) <0.001
Acute histologic chorioamnionitisb 28.1% (9/32)c 29.3% (12/41)c 59.4% (19/32) 89.5% (17/19) <0.001
Acute funisitisb 15.6% (5/32)c 14.6% (6/41)c 28.1% (9/32) 68.4% (13/19) <0.001

Data are given as median (interquartile range) and percentage (n/N)

a

Kruskal-Wallis test

b

Fisher’s exact test

c

Few missing data

Amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations in women with spontaneous preterm labor

Amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations above the limit of detection (LOD, 0.249 ng/mL) were determined in each study group as shown in Table 2. Few patients with spontaneous preterm labor that delivered either at term or preterm without SIAI or IAI had amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations above the LOD [preterm labor who delivered at term: 3.1% (1/32); preterm labor who delivered preterm without SIAI or IAI: 4.9% (2/41)] (Table 2). Fifty percent (16/32) of patients with spontaneous preterm labor that delivered preterm with SIAI had amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations above the LOD, whereas 89.5% (17/19) of patients who underwent spontaneous preterm labor and delivered preterm with IAI had an elevated gasdermin D concentration (Table 2).

Table 2.

Amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations above or below the limit of detection (0.249 ng/mL) in the study groups.

Gasdermin
concentration
Preterm labor
who
delivered at term
Preterm labor who delivered preterm
Without intra-amniotic
inflammation
With sterile intra-
amniotic inflammation
With intra-amniotic
infection
>0.249 ng/mL 3.1% (1/32) 4.9% (2/41) 50% (16/32) 89.5% (17/19)
<0.249 ng/mL 96.9% (31/32) 95.1% (39/41) 50% (16/32) 10.5% (2/19)

Data are given as percentage (n/N)

No differences were observed in the frequency of gasdermin D detection between patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth without intra-amniotic inflammation and those with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered at term without intra-amniotic inflammation [relative risk (RR) 1.2, p = 0.7] (Table 3). We then examined the association between gasdermin D concentrations and the presence of SIAI or IAI in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth. The frequency of detected amniotic fluid gasdermin D was higher in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth with either SIAI (RR 2.76, p < 0.001) or IAI (RR 15.58, p < 0.001) compared to those with preterm labor who delivered at term (Table 3). Moreover, the frequency of detected amniotic fluid gasdermin D was higher in patients with spontaneous labor and birth with either SIAI (RR 3.06, p < 0.001) or IAI (RR 18.34, p < 0.001) compared to those with preterm labor and birth without intra-amniotic inflammation (Table 3). Importantly, the frequency of detected amniotic fluid gasdermin D (RR 4.64, p = 0.004, Table 3), as well as its concentration (p<0.001, Figure 1), was higher in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth with IAI compared to those with SIAI. These results indicate that intra-amniotic inflammation induced either by microbes (IAI) or alarmins (SIAI) is significantly associated with the presence of gasdermin D, the effector molecule of pyroptosis, in amniotic fluid of patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth.

Table 3.

Association between the frequency of amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations > 0.249 ng/mL and the presence of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection in women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor

Group comparisons Odds ratio p-value
Preterm labor who delivered preterm without intra-amniotic inflammation vs. Preterm labor who delivered at term 1.3 (0.2-15.1) 0.8
Preterm labor who delivered preterm with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation vs. Preterm labor who delivered at term 21 (4.6-202.6) <0.001
Preterm labor who delivered preterm with intra-amniotic infection vs. Preterm labor who delivered at term 147 (23.4-1862.7) <0.001
Preterm labor who delivered preterm with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation vs. Preterm labor who delivered preterm without intra-amniotic inflammation 15.8 (4.3-86.4) <0.001
Preterm labor who delivered preterm with intra-amniotic infection vs. Preterm labor who delivered preterm without intra-amniotic inflammation 110.6 (21.3-916.9) <0.001
Preterm labor who delivered preterm with intra-amniotic infection vs. Preterm labor who delivered preterm with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation 7 (1.8-39.4) 0.004

Odds ratios are shown with 95% confidence intervals.

P-values were obtained using the Fisher’s exact test.

Figure 1. Amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations in women with spontaneous preterm labor.

Figure 1.

Extracellular gasdermin D (ng/mL) was measured in amniotic fluid of women with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered at term (n = 32) and those who delivered preterm without intra-amniotic inflammation (n = 41), with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (n = 32), or with intra-amniotic infection (n = 19). Data are shown as box-plots, with boxes representing the interquartile range, and midlines representing the median. Whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range. Outliers are shown as individual dots.

Gasdermin D in the chorioamniotic membranes of women with spontaneous preterm labor

The co-expression of gasdermin D, caspase-1, and IL-1β was low in the chorioamniotic membranes of women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor and delivered at term or preterm without intra-amniotic inflammation, and there were no evident differences in expression of these molecules between these two study groups (Figure 2). Yet, gasdermin D was highly expressed in the chorioamniotic membranes of patients with spontaneous preterm labor who delivered preterm either with SIAI or IAI (Figure 3). Moreover, gasdermin D expression in these study groups was detected along with caspase-1 and IL-1β in the chorioamniotic membranes, which is likely indicative of inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis (Figure 3). Additional experiments exploring the expression of active caspase-1 by non-leukocytes and leukocytes isolated from the decidual tissues of women with spontaneous preterm labor were also performed. We report that decidual cells from women with preterm labor and birth can undergo pyroptosis since such cells expressed active caspase-1 and had a permeable cell membrane (DAPI+ cells) (Figure 4A). The main leukocyte populations expressing active caspase-1 were macrophages and neutrophils (Figure 4B). Decidual T cells and B cells expressed minimal or no detectable active caspase-1, respectively (data not shown). These findings suggest that pyroptosis can occur in the chorioamniotic membranes and decidual tissues of women with spontaneous preterm labor and birth.

Figure 2. Gasdermin D expression in the chorioamniotic membranes of women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor without intra-amniotic inflammation.

Figure 2.

Representative multiplex immunofluorescence images showing the brightfield view, cell segmentation map, nuclear staining (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, DAPI, blue), and protein expression of gasdermin D (green), caspase-1 (yellow), and IL-1β (red) in the chorioamniotic membranes from women who underwent preterm labor and delivered at term (upper rows, left merged image) or preterm (bottom rows, right merged image) without intra-amniotic inflammation. Merged images show the co-localization of gasdermin D, caspase-1, and IL-1β expression. Images taken at 200X magnification. Scale bars = 100 μm.

Figure 3. Gasdermin D expression in the chorioamniotic membranes of women with spontaneous preterm labor and sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection.

Figure 3.

Representative multiplex immunofluorescence images showing the brightfield view, cell segmentation map, nuclear staining (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, DAPI, blue), and protein expression of gasdermin D (green), caspase-1 (yellow), and IL-1β (red) in the chorioamniotic membranes from women who underwent preterm labor and birth with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (upper rows, left merged image) or intra-amniotic infection (bottom rows, right merged image). Merged images show the co-localization of gasdermin D, caspase-1, and IL-1β expression. Images taken at 200X magnification. Scale bars = 100 μm.

Figure 4. Expression of active caspase-1 in decidual cells from women with preterm labor.

Figure 4.

(A) Representative flow cytometry gating strategy showing the expression of active caspase-1 (FLICA) in non-leukocytes (CD45− cells) and leukocytes (CD45+ cells) isolated from the decidua of women with preterm labor. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of active caspase-1 (FLICA) in macrophages (CD45+CD14+ cells) and neutrophils (CD45+CD15+ cells) in the decidual tissues from women with preterm labor. Red quadrants indicate pyroptotic cells (active caspase-1+ and permeable cell membrane, DAPI+). N=5.

DISCUSSION

Principal findings of the study

Herein, we report that: 1) extracellular gasdermin D is commonly detected in the amniotic fluid of women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor/birth with either sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection, and was rarely detected in those without intra-amniotic inflammation; 2) both the frequency of detected amniotic fluid gasdermin D and its concentration were higher in women with intra-amniotic infection than in those with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation; 3) gasdermin D was highly expressed in the chorioamniotic membranes of patients with either sterile intra-amniotic inflammation or intra-amniotic infection, and was associated with the inflammasome mediators caspase-1 and IL-1β; and 4) non-leukocytes and leukocytes (e.g. macrophages and neutrophils) expressed active caspase-1 in the decidua of women with preterm labor and birth. Collectively, these findings show that pyroptosis can occur in the amniotic cavity, chorioamniotic membranes, and decidua of women with spontaneous preterm labor and birth.

Pyroptosis in spontaneous preterm labor with intra-amniotic inflammation induced by microbes

Herein, we found that an increased frequency of detected extracellular gasdermin D in amniotic fluid is significantly associated with the presence of intra-amniotic infection in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth. Previous studies have demonstrated a clinical role for gasdermin D as a marker for pyroptosis both in affected tissues, as shown in the livers of patients with alcoholic hepatitis 115 as well as in biological fluids such as plasma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis 116. In the intra-amniotic cavity, the cells present in this compartment 117,118 are a possible source of gasdermin D, particularly the innate immune cells (i.e. neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages) that are increased in women with intra-amniotic infection 108,117-122. Gasdermin D has a dual purpose in neutrophils, forming pores which allow for the release of IL-1β during pyroptosis 89,123-125 but also partially mediating the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) 126-128, which can be found in the amniotic cavity and chorioamniotic membranes of women with intra-amniotic infection 122,129. Macrophages, in which pyroptosis was first described and characterized 79,80,130, have also been shown to display gasdermin D-mediated secretion of IL-1β in response to microbes or their products 83,84,125,131,132. Moreover, keratinocytes, a major cellular component of amniotic fluid 133-137, have been shown to express inflammasome components and mediators such as IL-1β 138,139. Thus, both innate immune cells and epithelial cells may contribute to amniotic fluid concentrations of gasdermin D in women who underwent spontaneous preterm labor with intra-amniotic infection. Yet, additional experimentation is required to investigate the origin of gasdermin D in amniotic fluid.

A possibility is that the adaptive immune cells (T cells) in amniotic fluid may also release gasdermin D. This is supported by the fact that T cells undergo caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis in response to viral infections such as HIV 140-143, although gasdermin D expression was not demonstrated in these studies. Further research is needed to investigate whether T cells release gasdermin D as a mechanism of pyroptosis in the amniotic cavity of women with spontaneous preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection.

Amniotic fluid immune cells can release gasdermin D; yet, the chorioamniotic membranes and placenta may be the primary sources of this pyroptosis effector molecule in the amniotic cavity. Herein, we show that the expression of gasdermin D is highest in the chorioamniotic membranes of patients with preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection and that decidual cells including leukocytes (macrophages and neutrophils) are capable of expressing active caspase-1. This is in line with previous work demonstrating that patients with spontaneous preterm labor with acute histologic chorioamnionitis, a placental lesion associated with intra-amniotic infection 105,106,144-151, have elevated expression of inflammasome components and mediators in the chorioamniotic membranes 44. Furthermore, the ultrasound-guided intra-amniotic administration of a microbial product, lipopolysaccharide, induces inflammasome activation in the murine fetal membranes, indicating that pyroptosis occurs in the amniotic cavity prior to preterm birth 47. In the clinical setting, inflammasome activation and pyroptosis could also be triggered by genital mycoplasmas 152-155, the most commonly found bacteria in women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection 23,156-162. Together, these findings implicate inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in the mechanisms that lead to an intra-amniotic inflammatory response in patients with spontaneous preterm labor with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity.

Pyroptosis in spontaneous preterm labor with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation

In the current study, we report that women with spontaneous preterm labor and sterile intra-amniotic inflammation had a greater frequency of detected amniotic fluid gasdermin D; yet, this was lower than in women with intra-amniotic infection. This finding is consistent with our recent study showing that patients with spontaneous labor at term (i.e. physiological inflammation 19,31,163-167) had higher amniotic fluid concentrations of gasdermin D compared to those who delivered at term without labor 168. In the context of preterm labor with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, gasdermin D could be released by amniotic fluid leukocytes, keratinocytes/epithelial cells, or other cellular components of amniotic fluid as well as by the chorioamniotic membranes and decidual stromal cells and leukocytes. This concept is supported by the fact that alarmins can initiate inflammasome-mediated inflammatory responses in both immune 169-174 and non-immune cells 173,175, and treatment of chorioamniotic membranes explants with the alarmin HMGB1 upregulates the expression of inflammasome components and released products 43. In addition, ultrasound-guided intra-amniotic administration of the alarmin S100B induces activation of the inflammasome in the murine fetal membranes prior to preterm birth 40. Along with clinical studies showing that there is inflammasome activation in the chorioamniotic membranes and amniotic fluid of women with preterm labor and sterile intra-amniotic inflammation 46, these data suggest that alarmins can induce inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth.

An important observation that requires further study is that decidual cells and leukocytes, mostly macrophages and neutrophils, can undergo pyroptosis in women with preterm labor and birth. It would be interesting to investigate whether decidual cells express differential amounts of active caspase-1 and mature IL-1β in different clinical scenarios: intra-amniotic infection vs. sterile intra-amniotic inflammation.

Conclusion

The data presented herein provide evidence that the effector molecule of pyroptosis, gasdermin D, can be detected in the amniotic fluid and chorioamniotic membranes of patients with spontaneous preterm labor and either intra-amniotic infection or sterile intra-amniotic inflammation. Moreover, amniotic fluid gasdermin D concentrations in patients with intra-amniotic infection are greater than in those with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation. These findings suggest that pyroptosis driven by either microbes or alarmins is a central pathway associated with pathological intra-amniotic inflammatory responses in patients with spontaneous preterm labor and birth. The current study provides insights into the immune mechanisms underlying the human syndrome of preterm labor. Further mechanistic studies are required to establish whether gasdermin D-mediated pyroptosis is implicated in the pathophysiology of inflammation-associated preterm labor and birth.

Acknowledgements:

We gratefully acknowledge the PRB Translational Research Laboratory for their contributions to the execution of this study. We thank the physicians and nurses from the Center for Advanced Obstetrical Care and Research and the Intrapartum Unit for their help in collecting human samples. The authors also thank the staff members of the PRB Clinical Laboratory and the PRB Histology/Pathology Unit for the processing and examination of the pathological sections.

Funding:

This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch (PRB), Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), and, in part, with federal funds from the NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C. This research was also supported by the Wayne State University Perinatal Initiative in Maternal, Perinatal and Child Health.

Footnotes

Disclosure statement: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2162–2172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385(9966):430–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manuck TA, Rice MM, Bailit JL, et al. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):103 e101–103 e114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Romero R, Mazor M, Munoz H, Gomez R, Galasso M, Sherer DM. The preterm labor syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;734:414–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berkowitz GS, Blackmore-Prince C, Lapinski RH, Savitz DA. Risk factors for preterm birth subtypes. Epidemiology. 1998;9(3):279–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moutquin JM. Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth. Bjog. 2003;110 Suppl 20:30–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):529–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Romero R, Mazor M, Wu YK, et al. Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12(4):262–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hirsch E, Saotome I, Hirsh D. A model of intrauterine infection and preterm delivery in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(5):1598–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baggia S, Gravett MG, Witkin SS, Haluska GJ, Novy MJ. Interleukin-1 beta intra-amniotic infusion induces tumor necrosis factor-alpha, prostaglandin production, and preterm contractions in pregnant rhesus monkeys. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1996;3(3):121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gomez R, Romero R, Edwin SS, David C. Pathogenesis of preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes associated with intraamniotic infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997;11(1):135–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hirsch E, Blanchard R, Mehta SP. Differential fetal and maternal contributions to the cytokine milieu in a murine model of infection-induced preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):429–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hirsch E, Muhle R. Intrauterine bacterial inoculation induces labor in the mouse by mechanisms other than progesterone withdrawal. Biol Reprod. 2002;67(4):1337–1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sadowsky DW, Novy MJ, Witkin SS, Gravett MG. Dexamethasone or interleukin-10 blocks interleukin-1beta-induced uterine contractions in pregnant rhesus monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):252–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Park JS, Park CW, Lockwood CJ, Norwitz ER. Role of cytokines in preterm labor and birth. Minerva Ginecol. 2005;57(4):349–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hirsch E, Filipovich Y, Mahendroo M. Signaling via the type I IL-1 and TNF receptors is necessary for bacterially induced preterm labor in a murine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1334–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Romero R, Gotsch F, Pineles B, Kusanovic JP. Inflammation in pregnancy: its roles in reproductive physiology, obstetrical complications, and fetal injury. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(12 Pt 2):S194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mendelson CR. Minireview: fetal-maternal hormonal signaling in pregnancy and labor. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23(7):947–954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Adams Waldorf KM, Gravett MG, McAdams RM, et al. Choriodecidual group B streptococcal inoculation induces fetal lung injury without intra-amniotic infection and preterm labor in Macaca nemestrina. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Senthamaraikannan P, Presicce P, Rueda CM, et al. Intra-amniotic Ureaplasma parvum-Induced Maternal and Fetal Inflammation and Immune Responses in Rhesus Macaques. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(10):1597–1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. A novel molecular microbiologic technique for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71(4):330–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72(5):458–474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic short cervix: prevalence and clinical significance. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Combs CA, Gravett M, Garite TJ, et al. Amniotic fluid infection, inflammation, and colonization in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):125 e121–125 e115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(12):1394–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oppenheim JJ, Yang D. Alarmins: chemotactic activators of immune responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(4):359–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lotze MT, Zeh HJ, Rubartelli A, et al. The grateful dead: damage-associated molecular pattern molecules and reduction/oxidation regulate immunity. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:60–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rubartelli A, Lotze MT. Inside, outside, upside down: damage-associated molecular-pattern molecules (DAMPs) and redox. Trends Immunol. 2007;28(10):429–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Romero R, Brody DT, Oyarzun E, et al. Infection and labor. III. Interleukin-1: a signal for the onset of parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(5 Pt 1):1117–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Romero R, Mazor M, Brandt F, et al. Interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-1 beta in preterm and term human parturition. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992;27(3-4):117–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Friel LA, Romero R, Edwin S, et al. The calcium binding protein, S100B, is increased in the amniotic fluid of women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and preterm labor with intact or ruptured membranes. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(5):385–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chaiworapongsa T, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, et al. Amniotic fluid heat shock protein 70 concentration in histologic chorioamnionitis, term and preterm parturition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21(7):449–461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Alpay Savasan Z, et al. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in preterm labor with intact membranes and preterm PROM: a study of the alarmin HMGB1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(12):1444–1455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Savasan ZA, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis is characterized by changes in the expression of the alarmin HMGB1 and one of its receptors, sRAGE. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(6):558–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Romero R, Mazor M, Tartakovsky B. Systemic administration of interleukin-1 induces preterm parturition in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):969–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Romero R, Tartakovsky B. The natural interleukin-1 receptor antagonist prevents interleukin-1-induced preterm delivery in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(4 Pt 1):1041–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Plazyo O, et al. Intra-Amniotic Administration of HMGB1 Induces Spontaneous Preterm Labor and Birth. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(1):3–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Garcia-Flores V, et al. Inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome can prevent sterile intra-amniotic inflammation, preterm labor/birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Biol Reprod. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gotsch F, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Evidence of the involvement of caspase-1 under physiologic and pathologic cellular stress during human pregnancy: a link between the inflammasome and parturition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21(9):605–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jaiswal MK, Agrawal V, Mallers T, Gilman-Sachs A, Hirsch E, Beaman KD. Regulation of apoptosis and innate immune stimuli in inflammation-induced preterm labor. J Immunol. 2013;191(11):5702–5713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Plazyo O, Romero R, Unkel R, et al. HMGB1 Induces an Inflammatory Response in the Chorioamniotic Membranes That Is Partially Mediated by the Inflammasome. Biol Reprod. 2016;95(6):130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, et al. A Role for the Inflammasome in Spontaneous Preterm Labor With Acute Histologic Chorioamnionitis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(10):1382–1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cross SN, Potter JA, Aldo P, et al. Viral Infection Sensitizes Human Fetal Membranes to Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide by MERTK Inhibition and Inflammasome Activation. J Immunol. 2017;199(8):2885–2895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Panaitescu B, et al. Inflammasome activation during spontaneous preterm labor with intra-amniotic infection or sterile intra-amniotic inflammation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80(5):e13049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Faro J, Romero R, Schwenkel G, et al. Intra-Amniotic inflammation induces preterm birth by Activating the NLRP3 inflammasome. Biol Reprod. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lim R, Lappas M. NOD-like receptor pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) regulates inflammation-induced pro-labor mediators in human myometrial cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;79(4):e12825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Strauss JF 3rd, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth: advances toward the discovery of genetic predisposition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):294–314.e292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Willcockson AR, Nandu T, Liu CL, Nallasamy S, Kraus WL, Mahendroo M. Transcriptome signature identifies distinct cervical pathways induced in lipopolysaccharide-mediated preterm birth. Biol Reprod. 2018;98(3):408–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell. 2002;10(2):417–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Petrilli V, Papin S, Tschopp J. The inflammasome. Curr Biol. 2005;15(15):R581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ogura Y, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA. The inflammasome: first line of the immune response to cell stress. Cell. 2006;126(4):659–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mariathasan S, Monack DM. Inflammasome adaptors and sensors: intracellular regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(1):31–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stutz A, Golenbock DT, Latz E. Inflammasomes: too big to miss. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(12):3502–3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Franchi L, Eigenbrod T, Munoz-Planillo R, Nunez G. The inflammasome: a caspase-1-activation platform that regulates immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(3):241–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jha S, Ting JP. Inflammasome-associated nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat proteins and inflammatory diseases. J Immunol. 2009;183(12):7623–7629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schroder K, Tschopp J. The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140(6):821–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R, Reimer T, Eigenbrod T, Nunez G. Inflammasomes as microbial sensors. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(3):611–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gross O, Thomas CJ, Guarda G, Tschopp J. The inflammasome: an integrated view. Immunol Rev. 2011;243(1):136–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Modulation of inflammasome pathways by bacterial and viral pathogens. J Immunol. 2011;187(2):597–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Horvath GL, Schrum JE, De Nardo CM, Latz E. Intracellular sensing of microbes and danger signals by the inflammasomes. Immunol Rev. 2011;243(1):119–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.van de Veerdonk FL, Netea MG, Dinarello CA, Joosten LA. Inflammasome activation and IL-1beta and IL-18 processing during infection. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(3):110–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R, Nunez G. Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):325–332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Franchi L, Nunez G. Immunology. Orchestrating inflammasomes. Science. 2012;337(6100):1299–1300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Henao-Mejia J, Elinav E, Strowig T, Flavell RA. Inflammasomes: far beyond inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):321–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(6):397–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Mechanisms and functions of inflammasomes. Cell. 2014;157(5):1013–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JP. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):677–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Black RA, Kronheim SR, Merriam JE, March CJ, Hopp TP. A pre-aspartate-specific protease from human leukocytes that cleaves pro-interleukin-1 beta. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(10):5323–5326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kostura MJ, Tocci MJ, Limjuco G, et al. Identification of a monocyte specific pre-interleukin 1 beta convertase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(14):5227–5231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Thornberry NA, Bull HG, Calaycay JR, et al. A novel heterodimeric cysteine protease is required for interleukin-1 beta processing in monocytes. Nature. 1992;356(6372):768–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Cerretti DP, Kozlosky CJ, Mosley B, et al. Molecular cloning of the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Science. 1992;256(5053):97–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gu Y, Kuida K, Tsutsui H, et al. Activation of interferon-gamma inducing factor mediated by interleukin-1beta converting enzyme. Science. 1997;275(5297):206–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ghayur T, Banerjee S, Hugunin M, et al. Caspase-1 processes IFN-gamma-inducing factor and regulates LPS-induced IFN-gamma production. Nature. 1997;386(6625):619–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-18, and the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;856:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA. Interleukin-18 and interleukin-1 beta: two cytokine substrates for ICE (caspase-1). J Clin Immunol. 1999;19(1):1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Netea MG, van de Veerdonk FL, van der Meer JW, Dinarello CA, Joosten LA. Inflammasome-independent regulation of IL-1-family cytokines. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:49–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cookson BT, Brennan MA. Pro-inflammatory programmed cell death. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9(3):113–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bergsbaken T, Fink SL, Cookson BT. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(2):99–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Miao EA, Rajan JV, Aderem A. Caspase-1-induced pyroptotic cell death. Immunol Rev. 2011;243(1):206–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shalini S, Dorstyn L, Dawar S, Kumar S. Old, new and emerging functions of caspases. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(4):526–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kayagaki N, Stowe IB, Lee BL, et al. Caspase-11 cleaves gasdermin D for non-canonical inflammasome signalling. Nature. 2015;526(7575):666–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526(7575):660–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gaidt MM, Hornung V. Pore formation by GSDMD is the effector mechanism of pyroptosis. Embo j. 2016;35(20):2167–2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sborgi L, Ruhl S, Mulvihill E, et al. GSDMD membrane pore formation constitutes the mechanism of pyroptotic cell death. Embo j. 2016;35(16):1766–1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Aglietti RA, Dueber EC. Recent Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Pyroptosis and Gasdermin Family Functions. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(4):261–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shi J, Gao W, Shao F. Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Mediated Programmed Necrotic Cell Death. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(4):245–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Liu X, Zhang Z, Ruan J, et al. Inflammasome-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature. 2016;535(7610):153–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Amogan HP, et al. Microbial prevalence, diversity and abundance in amniotic fluid during preterm labor: a molecular and culture-based investigation. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.DiGiulio DB, Gervasi M, Romero R, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preeclampsia as assessed by cultivation and sequence-based methods. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(5):503–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.DiGiulio DB, Gervasi MT, Romero R, et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(5):495–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.DiGiulio DB, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64(1):38–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, et al. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(5):1130–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, et al. CXCL10 and IL-6: Markers of two different forms of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, et al. Are amniotic fluid neutrophils in women with intraamniotic infection and/or inflammation of fetal or maternal origin? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):693.e691–693.e616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Antibiotic administration can eradicate intra-amniotic infection or inflammation in a subset of patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Oh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pacora P, Romero R, Erez O, et al. The diagnostic performance of the beta-glucan assay in the detection of intra-amniotic infection with Candida species. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Musilova I, Andrys C, Holeckova M, et al. Interleukin-6 measured using the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018:1–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Varrey A, Romero R, Panaitescu B, et al. Human beta-defensin-1: A natural antimicrobial peptide present in amniotic fluid that is increased in spontaneous preterm labor with intra-amniotic infection. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80(4):e13031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Apgar V A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32(4):260–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.van Tetering AAC, van de Ven J, Fransen AF, Dieleman JP, van Runnard Heimel PJ, Oei SG. Risk factors of incomplete Apgar score and umbilical cord blood gas analysis: a retrospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(21):2539–2544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Thavarajah H, Flatley C, Kumar S. The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(10):1335–1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, Kim YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4 Suppl):S29–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Redline RW. Classification of placental lesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4 Suppl):S21–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Romero R, Kim YM, Pacora P, et al. The frequency and type of placental histologic lesions in term pregnancies with normal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(6):613–630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Romero R, Quintero R, Nores J, et al. Amniotic fluid white blood cell count: a rapid and simple test to diagnose microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):821–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Romero R, Jimenez C, Lohda AK, et al. Amniotic fluid glucose concentration: a rapid and simple method for the detection of intraamniotic infection in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):968–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, et al. The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(1):114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Romero R, Avila C, Santhanam U, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin 6 in preterm labor. Association with infection. J Clin Invest. 1990;85(5):1392–1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Redline RW, Faye-Petersen O, Heller D, et al. Amniotic infection syndrome: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6(5):435–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Roberts DJ, Celi AC, Riley LE, et al. Acute histologic chorioamnionitis at term: nearly always noninfectious. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Xu Y, Plazyo O, Romero R, Hassan SS, Gomez-Lopez N. Isolation of Leukocytes from the Human Maternal-fetal Interface. J Vis Exp. 2015(99):e52863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Khanova E, Wu R, Wang W, et al. Pyroptosis by caspase11/4-gasdermin-D pathway in alcoholic hepatitis in mice and patients. Hepatology. 2018;67(5):1737–1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mitra S, Exline M, Habyarimana F, et al. Microparticulate Caspase 1 Regulates Gasdermin D and Pulmonary Vascular Endothelial Cell Injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018;59(1):56–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, et al. The immunophenotype of amniotic fluid leukocytes in normal and complicated pregnancies. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;79(4):e12827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gomez-Lopez N, Roberto R, Galaz J, et al. Cellular immune responses in amniotic fluid of women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection or intra-amniotic inflammation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2019:e13171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white blood cell count, interleukin-6, and gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(4):839–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Gomez R, Romero R, Galasso M, Behnke E, Insunza A, Cotton DB. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin-6, white blood cell count, and gram stain in the diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients at term. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994;32(3):200–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Garcia-Flores V, et al. Amniotic fluid neutrophils can phagocytize bacteria: A mechanism for microbial killing in the amniotic cavity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Amniotic Cavity of Women with Intra-Amniotic Infection: A New Mechanism of Host Defense. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(8):1139–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cerqueira DM, Gomes MTR, Silva ALN, et al. Guanylate-binding protein 5 licenses caspase-11 for Gasdermin-D mediated host resistance to Brucella abortus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(12):e1007519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Heilig R, Dick MS, Sborgi L, Meunier E, Hiller S, Broz P. The Gasdermin-D pore acts as a conduit for IL-1beta secretion in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48(4):584–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Monteleone M, Stanley AC, Chen KW, et al. Interleukin-1beta Maturation Triggers Its Relocation to the Plasma Membrane for Gasdermin-D-Dependent and -Independent Secretion. Cell Rep. 2018;24(6):1425–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Chen KW, Monteleone M, Boucher D, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D-dependent neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. 2018;3(26). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sollberger G, Choidas A, Burn GL, et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. 2018;3(26). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Tall AR, Westerterp M. Inflammasomes, Neutrophil Extracellular Traps, and Cholesterol. J Lipid Res. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Leng Y, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in acute chorioamnionitis: A mechanism of host defense. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Fink SL, Cookson BT. Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun. 2005;73(4):1907–1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Evavold CL, Ruan J, Tan Y, Xia S, Wu H, Kagan JC. The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secretion from Living Macrophages. Immunity. 2018;48(1):35–44.e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Semino C, Carta S, Gattorno M, Sitia R, Rubartelli A. Progressive waves of IL-1beta release by primary human monocytes via sequential activation of vesicular and gasdermin D-mediated secretory pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(11):1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Agorastos T [Antenatal estimation of fetal maturity by exfoliative cytology of amniotic fluid (author's transl)]. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1979;183(2):118–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Agorastos T, Bar T, Grussendorf EI, Liedtke B, Lamberti G. ["Ultrastructural aspects of amniotic-Fluid Cells". A. Non-vital cells. II. Keratinocytes (author's transl)]. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1981;185(3):178–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.von Koskull H Rapid identification of glial cells in human amniotic fluid with indirect immunofluorescence. Acta Cytol. 1984;28(4):393–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gosden CM. Amniotic fluid cell types and culture. Br Med Bull. 1983;39(4):348–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Akiyama M, Holbrook KA. Analysis of skin-derived amniotic fluid cells in the second trimester; detection of severe genodermatoses expressed in the fetal period. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103(5):674–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lian LH, Milora KA, Manupipatpong KK, Jensen LE. The double-stranded RNA analogue polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid induces keratinocyte pyroptosis and release of IL-36gamma. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(5):1346–1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Simanski M, Rademacher F, Schroder L, Glaser R, Harder J. The Inflammasome and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Are Involved in the Staphylococcus aureus-Mediated Induction of IL-1alpha and IL-1beta in Human Keratinocytes. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Doitsh G, Galloway NL, Geng X, et al. Cell death by pyroptosis drives CD4 T-cell depletion in HIV-1 infection. Nature. 2014;505(7484):509–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Galloway NL, Doitsh G, Monroe KM, et al. Cell-to-Cell Transmission of HIV-1 Is Required to Trigger Pyroptotic Death of Lymphoid-Tissue-Derived CD4 T Cells. Cell Rep. 2015;12(10):1555–1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lu W, Demers AJ, Ma F, et al. Next-Generation mRNA Sequencing Reveals Pyroptosis-Induced CD4+ T Cell Death in Early Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Lymphoid Tissues. J Virol. 2016;90(2):1080–1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Cai R, Liu L, Luo B, et al. Caspase-1 Activity in CD4 T Cells Is Downregulated Following Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-1 Infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017;33(2):164–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Blanc WA. Amniotic infection syndrome; pathogenesis, morphology, and significance in circumnatal mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1959;2:705–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Blanc WA. Pathology of the placenta and cord in ascending and in haematogenous infection. Ciba Found Symp. 1979(77):17–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, Kiviat N, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA. A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(15):972–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Kiviat NB, Watts DH, Eschenbach DA. Microbiologic causes and neonatal outcomes associated with chorioamnion infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):955–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Romero R, Salafia CM, Athanassiadis AP, et al. The relationship between acute inflammatory lesions of the preterm placenta and amniotic fluid microbiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(5):1382–1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Redline RW, Faye-Petersen O, Heller D, Qureshi F, Savell V, Vogler C. Amniotic infection syndrome: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6(5):435–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Redline RW. Placental inflammation. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9(4):265–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Anders AP, Gaddy JA, Doster RS, Aronoff DM. Current concepts in maternal-fetal immunology: Recognition and response to microbial pathogens by decidual stromal cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Chelmonska-Soyta A, Miller RB, Ruhnke L, Rosendal S. Activation of murine macrophages and lymphocytes by Ureaplasma diversum. Can J Vet Res. 1994;58(4):275–280. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Sugiyama M, Saeki A, Hasebe A, et al. Activation of inflammasomes in dendritic cells and macrophages by Mycoplasma salivarium. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2016;31(3):259–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Saeki A, Sugiyama M, Hasebe A, Suzuki T, Shibata K. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in macrophages by mycoplasmal lipoproteins and lipopeptides. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2018;33(4):300–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Segovia JA, Chang TH, Winter VT, et al. NLRP3 Is a Critical Regulator of Inflammation and Innate Immune Cell Response during Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection. Infect Immun. 2018;86(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Gibbs RS, Blanco JD, St Clair PJ, Castaneda YS. Quantitative bacteriology of amniotic fluid from women with clinical intraamniotic infection at term. J Infect Dis. 1982;145(1):1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, et al. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(3):817–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Romero PJ, Rojas L. The effect of ATP on Ca(2+)-dependent K+ channels of human red cells. Acta Cient Venez. 1992;43(1):19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Cox C, Saxena N, Watt AP, et al. The common vaginal commensal bacterium Ureaplasma parvum is associated with chorioamnionitis in extreme preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(22):3646–3651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Yoneda N, Yoneda S, Niimi H, et al. Polymicrobial Amniotic Fluid Infection with Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma and Other Bacteria Induces Severe Intra-Amniotic Inflammation Associated with Poor Perinatal Prognosis in Preterm Labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(2):112–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Oh KJ, Kim SM, Hong JS, et al. Twenty-four percent of patients with clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestations have no evidence of either culture-proven intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):604.e601–604.e611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Oh KJ, Hong JS, Romero R, Yoon BH. The frequency and clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in twin pregnancies with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(4):527–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Liggins CG. Cervical ripening as an inflammatory reaction. In: Elwood DA, Andersson ABM, eds. Cervix in Pregnancy and Labour. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1981:1 – 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Norman JE, Bollapragada S, Yuan M, Nelson SM. Inflammatory pathways in the mechanism of parturition. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7 Suppl 1:S7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Norwitz ER, Bonney EA, Snegovskikh VV, et al. Molecular Regulation of Parturition: The Role of the Decidual Clock. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Herrera CA, Stoerker J, Carlquist J, et al. Cell-free DNA, inflammation, and the initiation of spontaneous term labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):583 e581–583 e588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Phillippe M The link between cell-free DNA, inflammation and the initiation of spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):501–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Panaitescu B, et al. Gasdermin D: In vivo evidence of pyroptosis in spontaneous labor at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, Submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Duewell P, Kono H, Rayner KJ, et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1357–1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Lin J, Shou X, Mao X, et al. Oxidized low density lipoprotein induced caspase-1 mediated pyroptotic cell death in macrophages: implication in lesion instability? PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Xu J, Jiang Y, Wang J, et al. Macrophage endocytosis of high-mobility group box 1 triggers pyroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21(8):1229–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Chen Q, Jin Y, Zhang K, et al. Alarmin HNP-1 promotes pyroptosis and IL-1beta release through different roles of NLRP3 inflammasome via P2X7 in LPS-primed macrophages. Innate Immun. 2014;20(3):290–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ruiz PA, Moron B, Becker HM, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles exacerbate DSS-induced colitis: role of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Gut. 2017;66(7):1216–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Lan P, Fan Y, Zhao Y, et al. TNF superfamily receptor OX40 triggers invariant NKT cell pyroptosis and liver injury. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(6):2222–2234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Yin Y, Li X, Sha X, et al. Early hyperlipidemia promotes endothelial activation via a caspase-1-sirtuin 1 pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(4):804–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES