Highlights
A general layered 2D materials-derived atomic substitution conversion strategy is proposed to achieve the synthesis of large-size ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials.
Using low-melting-point CdI2 flakes via a simple hot plate assisted vertical vapor deposition method as precursor, large-size ultrathin CdS flakes were successfully converted from layered to nonlayered nanostructures through a facile low-temperature chemical sulfurization process.
The size and thickness of CdS flakes can be controlled by the CdI2 precursor. The growth mechanism is ascribed to the chemical substitution reaction from I to S atoms between CdI2 and CdS, which has been evidenced by experiments and theoretical calculations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-021-00692-6.
Keywords: Nonlayered 2D materials, Large-size ultrathin CdS flakes, Atomic substitution conversion, Layered-nonlayered structural transformation
Abstract
Nonlayered two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted increasing attention, due to novel physical properties, unique surface structure, and high compatibility with microfabrication technique. However, owing to the inherent strong covalent bonds, the direct synthesis of 2D planar structure from nonlayered materials, especially for the realization of large-size ultrathin 2D nonlayered materials, is still a huge challenge. Here, a general atomic substitution conversion strategy is proposed to synthesize large-size, ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials. Taking nonlayered CdS as a typical example, large-size ultrathin nonlayered CdS single-crystalline flakes are successfully achieved via a facile low-temperature chemical sulfurization method, where pre-grown layered CdI2 flakes are employed as the precursor via a simple hot plate assisted vertical vapor deposition method. The size and thickness of CdS flakes can be controlled by the CdI2 precursor. The growth mechanism is ascribed to the chemical substitution reaction from I to S atoms between CdI2 and CdS, which has been evidenced by experiments and theoretical calculations. The atomic substitution conversion strategy demonstrates that the existing 2D layered materials can serve as the precursor for difficult-to-synthesize nonlayered 2D materials, providing a bridge between layered and nonlayered materials, meanwhile realizing the fabrication of large-size ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-021-00692-6.
Introduction
The two-dimensional (2D) materials with atomically thin thickness, including layered and nonlayered materials, have gained extensive research interest in recent years, owing to their abundant species, diverse exotic properties, broad promising applications [1–6]. Particularly, nonlayered 2D materials formed by strongly intrinsic covalent bonds in three-dimensional (3D) directions without van der Waals (vdW) gap, occupy the majority among the tens of thousands of 2D materials, in contrast to layered 2D materials with strong in-plane chemical bonding and naturally weak interplane vdW interaction [1, 2, 7]. Moreover, in comparison with layered 2D materials, nonlayered 2D materials possess both the novel features of their bulks and 2D characteristics inducing abundant distinct phenomena necessary complement to layered 2D materials [8, 9]; nonlayered 2D materials own large lattice structural distortion in the 2D limit absent in layered materials, leading to massive number of surface dangling bonds and further greatly enhancing the surface chemical activity [8, 10]; nonlayered 2D materials also have strong mechanical flexibility favoring high compatibility with traditional Si substrate and integration capability with current microfabrication techniques [11, 12]. Thus, nonlayered 2D materials have attracted dramatical attention for various promising applications in modern electronics, optoelectronics, catalysis, energy storage and conversion [13–19].
However, it remains greatly difficult to prepare nonlayered 2D materials at present, in contrast to layered 2D materials. Specially, due to the intrinsically strong 3D bonding character, the nonlayered 2D materials are unable to suspend stably at 2D scale within Born–Oppenheimer surface consideration, resulting in tendency to stack into 3D nanostructures induced by surface energy constraints [5, 20–22]. Moreover, the creation of 2D morphology from nonlayered 2D materials usually requires to introduce additional driving force to overcome the intrinsic surface tension and stabilize the crystal structure [8, 10, 20]. Currently, to promote 2D anisotropic growth of nonlayered materials, three main synthetic strategies have been adopted to obtain 2D planar structure of nonlayered materials, namely external force-assisted lamellar exfoliation strategy [23, 24], vdW substrate-guided anisotropic growth strategy [25–28], synergistic additive-mediated growth strategy [29–31]. The external force-assisted lamellar exfoliation strategy usually suffers from small lateral size, irregular morphology and random distribution of the products [23, 24]; vdW epitaxy substrate-guided anisotropic growth strategy usually requires harsh preparation conditions such as relative high growth temperature [25–28]; synergistic additive-mediated growth strategy would inevitably introduce foreign elements, degrading the crystal quality [29–31]. In general, current synthetic strategies cannot provide a satisfying solution for large-size ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials with high quality. Therefore, it is especially important and highly urgent to develop effective routes to synthesize nonlayered 2D materials with desired morphology and quality, in order to realize their practical industry applications in future.
Herein, a general layered 2D materials-derived atomic substitution conversion strategy is proposed to achieve the synthesis of large-size ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials. In this work, taking CdS as a typical nonlayered 2D material with stable wurtzite structure for example, using low-melting-point CdI2 flakes via a simple hot plate assisted vertical vapor deposition (HPVVD) method as precursor, large-size ultrathin CdS flakes were successfully converted from layered to nonlayered nanostructures through a facile low-temperature chemical sulfurization process. The converted CdS flakes demonstrate large-size (up to submillimeter scale), ultrathin thickness (down to 2 nm), high-quality single crystals. Specially, the lateral size and vertical thickness of CdS flakes can be controlled by the CdI2 flakes precursor. The conversion mechanism was revealed via experiments and theoretical calculations, which might be attributed to an atomic-level chemical substitution reaction from I to S atoms between layered CdI2 and nonlayered CdS. The presented generalized atomic substitution conversion strategy may open a new avenue to synthesize ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials with large size.
Experimental Section
Growth of Layered CdI2 Flakes
2D CdI2 flakes were prepared by a facile HPVVD method in ambient environment. First, trace amount of CdI2 powder precursor was transferred on a clean glass slide and then placed on a hot plate at room temperature. Meanwhile, two glass slides with thickness of 1 mm were mounted on both sides of the precursor glass slide. The temperature of the hot plate was then ramped to expected growth temperature (360–400 °C), and a freshly cleaved mica substrate was put on top of the precursor. 2D CdI2 flakes started to deposit on the mica substrate immediately and the mica substrate can be removed soon. The whole fabrication process took only a few minutes under atmospheric pressure. The CdI2 flakes can also grow on SiO2/Si and quartz substrates other than mica substrate.
Conversion of Layered CdI2 into Nonlayered CdS Flakes
The conversion from CdI2 to CdS flakes was conducted in an atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) furnace system. In a typical process, 300 mg S powder was placed at the center heating zone of the tubular furnace, and the substrates with as-grown CdI2 flakes were placed 3 to 8 cm on the downstream side. The evaporation temperature of S powder at the central zone was increased to 280–300 °C and maintained for 30–60 min. The whole conversion process was achieved at atmospheric pressure with 100 sccm Ar used as carrier gas. Finally, the furnace was naturally cooled down to room temperature.
Characterization of CdI2 and CdS Flakes
The surface morphology, domain size and thickness of CdI2 and CdS crystals were characterized by optical microscope (OM) (OLYMPUS, BX51) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Bruker, Dimension Icon). The crystal structure, phase, and composition were analyzed using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Bruker, D2 phaser), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Kratos, AXIS-ULTRA DLD-600 W), microscope-based Raman spectrometer (WITec, Alpha 300RS+, 532 nm excitation laser) equipped with a 100X objective lens, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (FEI, Tecnai G2 F30) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system.
Fabrication and Performance Measurement of CdS Devices
The photodetector based on CdS flakes was fabricated through a previously reported transfer electrode method [32, 33]. Briefly, Au electrodes were firstly deposited on a hydrophobic SiO2/Si substrate by the thermal evaporation machine (Nexdep, Angstrom Engineering), and then picked up carefully assisted by the liquid Ga metal, and finally transferred to the desired CdS flake. The optoelectrical properties were measured on a probe station (Lakeshore, TTPX) which was linked to a semiconductor device analyzer (Keysight, B1500A) and a 365 nm laser with an adjustable optical attenuator. Notably, all the photoelectrical measurements are conducted at room temperature in ambient condition.
Theory Calculations
The thermodynamic function and data were calculated from the HSC chemistry 6. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed in the Vienna Ab initio Software Package (VASP) [34]. The projected augmented wave (PAW) method and the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof of generalized gradient approximation (PBE-GGA) were employed [35–37]. A plane-wave energy cutoff of 500 eV was adopted. The k-point of CdI2 and CdS was set as 1 × 1 × 1. 0.01 eV Å−1 and 10–5 eV was used as the maximum energy difference and residual forces, respectively.
Results and Discussion
Conversion Process of Layered CdI2 Flakes into Nonlayered CdS Flakes
Figure 1 schematically illustrates the synthesis process of nonlayered CdS flakes by conversion from layered CdI2 flakes as precursor via vapor-phase chemical sulfurization treatment. As shown in Fig. 1a, b, CdI2 has a typical layered structure with a hexagonal unit cell, and crystallizes in space group P63mc (186) with lattice constants of a = b = 4.25 Å, c = 13.73 Å; whereas CdS is a representative nonlayered material with a hexagonal unit cell, and belongs to space group P63mc (186) with lattice constants of a = b = 4.14 Å, c = 6.72 Å. Note that CdI2 and CdS have similar crystal symmetry, which is an important factor to promote the conversion process. We also need to point out while CdI2 is a typically layered material with weak vdW force, CdS has a nonlayered crystal structure without vdW gap, which is significant meaningful for layered-nonlayered structural conversion to form nonlayered crystal structure. Figure 1c displays the conversion process from CdI2 to CdS through a simple sulfurization reaction. In detail, the S atoms replace the I atoms by exposing CdI2 under S-rich vapors accompanied by the breaking of Cd-I bonds and the formation of Cd-S bonds, resulting in the successful conversion from layered to nonlayered structural transformation. It should be noted that the as-grown CdI2 flakes were firstly synthesized as the growth precursor for transferring into CdS flakes via a facile HPVVD method in ambient condition, followed by the chemical sulfurization process to form CdS flakes (see Experimental Section for details). Importantly, the HPVVD is actually a simple and efficient vertical vapor deposition process, which is a totally open heating system conducted in a mild atmospheric environment; this novel method avoids expensive equipment and harsh reaction conditions (e. g., high vacuum environment, high growth temperature and long growth time), compared to traditional physical/chemical vapor deposition (PVD/CVD) technology [38–42]. More importantly, owning to the low melting point of both the S (112 °C) and CdI2 (404 °C), the chemical sulfurization process can be performed at relatively low temperature (280–300 °C) compared to common CVD, resulting in the direct conversion from metal halides to chalcogenides without obvious change in 2D planar shape and size.
Growth and Characterization of Layered CdI2 Flakes
Firstly, large-scale ultrathin CdI2 single-crystal flakes were grown by a facile and efficient HPVVD technique. Figure 2a presents the HPVVD apparatus, which consists merely of a hot plate and several glass slides as glass mounting bracket to achieve microspacing between the CdI2 powder precursor and the mica substrate. The whole growth procedure can be totally accomplished under ambient pressure in air within only a few minutes, which is simple and quick devoid of any rigorous experimental conditions as required by conventional vapor deposition implemented in a horizontally placed quartz tube. Simply adjusting growth temperature (360–400 °C), growth time (1–2 min) and spacing distance (1–2 mm) between the precursor and the substrate, which are considered as key growth factors in such vertical deposition configuration, abundant CdI2 flakes with different thickness are fully grown on the mica substrate, displaying regular triangular or hexagonal shape with smooth surface and sharp edges, as shown in Fig. 2b. The 2D flake-like CdI2 crystals are featured with well-defined morphology determined by the intrinsic hexagonal crystal structure, indicating the single-crystalline nature. Notably, the maximum lateral size of CdI2 flakes can even surpass 100 μm (Fig. 2c), which is much larger than traditional PVD-based CdI2 flakes reported so far [43]. Moreover, the thickness of ultrathin CdI2 flakes can be thinned down to about 0.68 nm (Fig. 2d), which corresponds to the theoretical thickness of monolayer CdI2 consisting of only one unit [I-Cd-I].
Furthermore, a series of characterizations and analysis of the as-grown CdI2 flakes were conducted to verify the crystal structure and chemical composition. Figure 2e presents the typical Raman spectra of CdI2 flakes grown on mica substrate. Obviously, there are two prominent and strong characteristic peaks around 45 and 110 cm−1, which correspond to the in-plane (Eg) and the out-of-plane (A1g) phonon vibration mode, respectively, in consist with the recently reported 2D CdI2 crystals [43, 44]. The inset is the representative Raman intensity maps of Eg and A1g modes of a typical CdI2 triangular flake, indicating highly uniform crystalline quality throughout the entire flake. Figure 2f shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CdI2 flakes grown on SiO2/Si substrate specially (in order to avoid the interference of mica substrate). It is clear that four sharp XRD peaks (12.88°, 25.92°, 39.37°, and 53.35°) can all be well indexed to {001} family planes ((002), (004), (006), (008)) of standard hexagonal phase CdI2 (PDF#33–0239), implying the (001) plane preferred growth orientation and good crystalline quality of as-synthesized CdI2 flakes. To further elucidate the crystal orientation and microstructure, TEM analysis was performed to characterize CdI2 flakes, as exhibited in Fig. 2g. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image and the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern display clearly resolved lattice fringes and a single set of sharp diffraction spots in hexagonal symmetry, further confirming the high single-crystalline nature of the CdI2 flakes. The measured lattice spacing along two different directions with 60° interfacial angle is 0.37 nm, corresponding to the {110} family planes of hexagonal phase CdI2. The results of HRTEM and SAED indicate that the (001) plane is the preferred growth orientation of CdI2 flakes, in accordance with the standard XRD pattern of hexagonal phase of CdI2. In addition, the elemental composition of as-prepared CdI2 samples was identified by the XPS, as depicted in Fig. 2h, i. The two strong peaks at around 406.27 and 413.02 eV are attributed to Cd 3d5/2 and Cd 3d3/2, respectively, meanwhile the peaks locating at 620.06 and 631.58 eV are assigned to I 3d5/2 and I 3d3/2, respectively. All above results prove that the as-grown CdI2 flakes are high-quality hexagonal single-crystal structure composed of (001) plane as preferential growth orientation. Hence, large-size ultrathin CdI2 flakes with high single-crystalline quality were successfully synthesized by a simple and effective HPVVD method, which is the basis of subsequent conversion from CdI2 flakes to obtain large-size ultrathin nonlayered CdS flakes.
Conversion Process of Layered CdI2 Flakes into Nonlayered CdS Flakes
Subsequently, large-size ultrathin CdS single-crystalline flakes were successfully converted from HPVVD-grown CdI2 flakes via low-temperature chemical sulfurization process. Figure 3a is a schematic of experimental setup for the sulfurization process, where the Ar gas transports vaporized S to the heated CdI2 flakes on mica substrate. Briefly, the conversion reaction was carried out in a quartz tube with Ar gas as carrier gas. The sulfur powder was placed at the center of the tubular furnace at 280–300 °C, while the pre-grown CdI2 flakes were placed at the downstream of the furnace. The Ar gas transports the vaporized sulfur to the heated CdI2 flakes to realize the conversion which depends on the chemical reaction between CdI2 flakes and chemically reactive sulfur vapor to form CdS flakes. It should be noted that the growth/transition temperature of the chemical sulfurization process is relatively low in contrast to the most nonlayered 2D materials [25, 29, 45]. Figure 3b, c exhibits the typical OM images for the original CdI2 flake with submillimeter size and the corresponding converted CdS flake, respectively. As can be seen, there is no obvious change in surface topography and lateral size of the resulting CdS flake as compared with the pristine CdI2 flake after chemical sulfurization. Figure 3d presents the corresponding AFM image for the converted CdS flake (marked in square region in Fig. 3c) with the ultrathin thickness (~ 2 nm), displaying relatively atomically sharp edges with a clean and smooth surface. The corresponding dark-field OM image also indicates uniform surface and clear domain boundary of the converted CdS flake, as shown in Fig. S1. Note that the lateral length is the largest size, and the thickness is the smallest thickness of 2D CdS flakes reported so far [29, 46–49]. Besides, large-area CdS flakes with various thickness were also successfully converted from parent CdI2 flakes (Fig. S2). Therefore, owning to the precursor-directed synthesis method, the resulting CdS flakes inherit all advantages of the parent CdI2 flakes, containing well-defined 2D lamellar structure and a high yield.
The Raman spectra collected from the converted CdS flakes are shown in Fig. 3e. It is found that the previously established CdI2 Raman peaks at 45 and 110 cm−1 disappear, while new peaks emerge at 300 and 600 cm−1, which can be determined as the first and second-order longitudinal optical (1LO and 2LO) phonon modes of CdS phase, respectively, in consistent with the previously reported PVD-based CdS flakes [29, 50]. The strong and uniform Raman intensity over the entire CdS flake (the inset of Figs. 3e and S3) indicates that the resulting products still maintain high uniformity and complete conversion of CdI2 into CdS. The crystalline structure of converted CdS samples was studied by XRD (Fig. 3f). Note that the XRD patterns of the resulting CdS flakes obtained from in situ conversion from the as-grown CdI2 flakes on SiO2/Si substrate (Fig. 2f). It is clear that two new peaks (26.51° and 53.35°) have appeared, which can be indexed to (002) and (004) crystalline planes of standard hexagonal CdS pattern (PDF#41-1049) without the observation of secondary phase, suggesting phase purity of the CdS products and (001) plane preferred exposed facet after the conversion process. It is worth noting that the diffraction peaks of CdI2 disappeared entirely, indicating a complete conversion of layered CdI2 into nonlayered CdS crystals. TEM was utilized to further explore the atomic structure of converted CdS crystals, as shown in Fig. 3g. The HRTEM image reveals relatively clear lattice fringes with interplanar spacing of (100) and (010) planes for hexagonal structure of CdS crystals. The SAED pattern presents only a set of clear and sharp hexagonal diffraction spots, which are well indexed to (100) and (010) planes and thus (001) plane is identified as the preferential exposed facet, in line with the XRD results, together verifying the excellent crystallinity quality of the resulting CdS flakes. Moreover, XPS analysis was performed to affirm the elemental composition of converted CdS products (Fig. 3h, i). It is apparent that the new peaks emerging at 161.50 and 162.24 eV, corresponding to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively, whereas the peaks (405.14 and 411.88 eV) are attributed to Cd 3d5/2 and Cd 3d3/2, respectively, further confirming the successful conversion into CdS crystals. Together, as discussed above, large-size ultrathin nonlayered CdS flakes with excellent crystallization were successfully and completely converted from CdI2 flakes as precursor through the facile low-temperature chemical sulfurization process. Furthermore, based on the same atomic substitution conversion strategy, nonlayered materials CdS (layered CdBr2 as the 2D precursor) and CdSe (layered CdI2 as the 2D precursor) have been successfully synthesized confirmed by both Raman spectroscopy and XRD characterizations (Fig. S4) [31, 51–53], demonstrating the universality of this novel strategy.
Growth Mechanism of CdS Flakes
To understand the underlying conversion process from layered CdI2 flakes to nonlayered CdS flakes in-depth, both experiments and theoretical calculations were performed to explore the growth/transformation mechanism. Firstly, the topography and thickness of 2D CdI2 flakes before and after being converted to CdS flakes were systematically investigated by AFM, as shown in Fig. 4a. It is clearly observed that the morphology (including surface shape and lateral dimension) of converted CdS flakes is almost identical to that of the original CdI2 flakes, probably reflecting the similar hexagonal crystal structure of CdI2 and CdS. Interestingly, the thickness of pristine CdI2 flakes and converted CdS flakes (before and after sulfurization conversion process) correlates to each other by 1.95, where the thickness of original CdI2 flakes was about 1.95 times higher than that of the corresponding converted CdS flakes, in good agreement with the ratio of the lattice constant between the two compounds along the c axis (CCdI2/CCdS = 13.73/6.72 Å = 2.04). Moreover, the AFM and the corresponding Raman intensity mapping characterizations were further employed to verify the complete conversion of CdI2 into CdS, as demonstrated in the inset of Fig. 4a. This can provide an effective route to control the morphology and thickness of the corresponding nonlayered 2D materials.
Furthermore, the theory calculations were performed to clarify the conversion mechanism of chemical transformation from CdI2 to CdS at atomic scale on the basis of the morphology retaining and thickness reducing phenomena observed in experiments, as depicted in detail in Fig. 4b, c). From the aspect of thermodynamics, the conversion process occurs between CdI2 and S vapor supplied by heating S powder when the temperature reach 280–300 °C, following the chemical reaction: CdI2 + S (g) = CdS + I2 (g). As shown in Fig. 4b, the calculated Gibbs free energy changes (∆G) are always negative in 273.15–1273.15 K, suggesting the conversion process is spontaneous sulfurization substitution reaction, in which ∆G = ∆H − T∆S, where ∆H, T, and ∆S is formation enthalpy changes, Kelvin temperature, and entropy changes, respectively. Moreover, the calculated formation enthalpy changes of CdS are always much negative than CdI2 in 273.15–1273.15 K, indicating CdS is more stable than CdI2 during the conversion process, namely Cd atoms prefer to form chemical bonding with S atoms rather than I atoms. Besides, the possible reaction pathway was proposed to interpret the growth process based on the atomic chemical substitution reaction from CdI2 to CdS, and the corresponding DFT-simulated energy profile was provided to investigate the crystal structure transformation from layered CdI2 to nonlayered CdS when the S atoms substitute I atoms, as depicted in detail in Fig. 4c. The potential atomic growth mechanism might undergo the chemical compound transformation of I (CdI2), II (transition state of CdS), III (transition state of CdS), and IV (CdS). Hence, the mechanism could be simply divided into three-step process, including S atoms replacing I atoms, Cd-S bond formation, and lattice compression along the c axis of CdS. Initially, owing to the volatility of I atoms and high local partial gas pressure of S2 molecular at high temperature, S atoms tend to substitute I atoms along the in-plane of CdI2, yielding an intermediate state with energetically unfavorable structure (II). Subsequently, to maintain more stable structure (III), the adjacent Cd layers are bridged by the S atoms gradually, meanwhile keeping the same lattice constant with CdI2 along the c axis, resulting in the disappearing of the vdW gaps that originally exist in layered CdI2. Finally, new Cd-S bonds form along the out-of-plane through lattice compression of c axis, contributing to form thermodynamically stable CdS (IV) product by comparison with the calculated formation energy of four chemical compounds. It is worth pointing out that layered CdI2 (a = b = 4.25 Å) and nonlayered CdS (a = b = 4.14 Å) have similar hexagonal crystal structure in the lateral direction (along the a and b axis direction of CdI2 and CdS). It means that breaking Cd-I bonds and forming Cd-S bonds do not need large rearrangements of Cd atoms, although small migration of positions of Cd atoms might be necessary to compensate the bond length difference between Cd-I and Cd-S, thus allowing gentle transformation without crystal structural collapse in the lateral direction, and leading to the morphology maintaining before and after chemical conversion. Whereas in the vertical direction (along the c axis direction of CdI2 and CdS), the distance between two Cd layers in CdI2 is 6.84 Å, while it is 3.42 Å in CdS without vdW gaps, determined by the intrinsic crystal structures of them. Thus, the thickness of the flake can be decreased to 50% after the chemical transforming from CdI2 to CdS in the theory.
Optoelectronic Performance of CdS Flakes
To examine the optoelectronic properties of the converted CdS flakes, the photodetector was in situ constructed on individual CdS flake on mica substrate via transfer electrode method (see Experimental Section for details). The schematic diagram of a typical converted CdS flake-based photodetector under 365 nm laser illumination is presented in Fig. 5a. The corresponding OM image and AFM height profile (the thickness is ~ 20 nm) are given in Fig. S5. Figure 5b shows the current versus voltage (I-V) characteristic curves of the device in the dark and under 365 nm laser illumination with a series of different light intensities. The corresponding time-dependent photoresponse is exhibited in Fig. 5c. Clearly, a pronounced photoconductive response is observed under laser illumination, indicating the outstanding photoresponse of the device which results from the enhancement of photo-generated carriers. Specially, this converted 2D CdS flake-based photodetector displays an ultralow dark current (Idark: ~ 120 fA) even at Vbias = 5 V, reflecting the high-resistance characteristics of CdS flakes. Thus, the corresponding photoswitching ratio (Iph/Idark) can reach up to 103 (6942) under 20.02 mW cm−2 (Vbias = 5 V), highly comparable and even superior to PVD-grown CdS flake-based and many other typical 2D nonlayered materials-based photodetectors [25–29, 45, 53, 54], verifying remarkable photoresponse to the ultraviolet light. Moreover, the power density-dependent photoresponse could be fitted as a power law, Iph = αPθ, where α, θ, and P represent the constant for a certain wavelength, power factor, and power density of incident light, respectively. As plotted in Fig. 5d, the fitting θ is 0.77, indicating such sublinear behavior possibly caused by trap states in converted CdS flakes, which was also observed in PVD-grown CdS flakes [29]. Furthermore, as crucial performance parameters of the photodetector, the responsivity (R) and the specific detectivity (D*), can be expressed as R = Iph/PS, and D* = RS1/2/(2eIdark)1/2), respectively, where Iph, S, and e represent photocurrent (Iph = Ilight -Idark), the effective illuminated area between channels, and elementary electronic charge, respectively. Hence, the obtained Rmax is 56.48 mA W−1, and the corresponding D* is 4.53 × 108 Jones under 0.09 mW cm−2 at 5 V bias. In addition, to further access the optoelectronic performance of the converted CdS flake-based photodetector, the stability and response speed were explored by switching the laser on and off. Figure 5e displays the time-dependent photoresponse of the device with the laser on/off time interval of 10 s at Vbias = 5 V, which demonstrates almost the same level of dark current and photocurrent after multiple cycles in 380 s hold time, suggesting highly stable and repeatable photoresponse to the light. More importantly, as key parameters to evaluate the crystalline quality of materials, the rise time (τrise) and decay time (τdecay), defined as the needed time of current variation between 10% and 90% of the maximum current, were calculated to be about 50 μs, which is much lower than PVD-grown CdS flakes and most nonlayered 2D materials [25–29, 45, 53, 54], indicating ultrafast photoresponse speed deriving from the high-crystalline quality of the converted CdS flakes. Overall, the photodetector based on the converted CdS flakes displays ultralow dark current, ultrahigh current on/off ratio, and ultrafast photoresponse speed, whose superior photoresponse performances are primarily ascribed to high-quality single-crystalline feature of the converted CdS flakes, further confirming the effectivity of the atomic substitution conversion strategy.
Conclusions
In summary, large-size ultrathin nonlayered CdS flakes were successfully synthesized by a facile atomic substitution conversion strategy, which transform from layered CdI2 flakes as the precursor via a simple HPVVD method. The resulting CdS flakes are high-quality singe crystals with the lateral size up to submillimeter scale and the thickness down to atomic layers level. Besides, the morphology, size and thickness of CdS flakes were well controlled by the precursor of CdI2 flakes. The atomic substitution conversion mechanism was confirmed by both of experiments and theoretical calculations, which could be attributed to the chemical substitution reaction from I to S atoms between CdI2 and CdS, meanwhile realizing in situ structural transformation from layered to nonlayered 2D materials. More importantly, this novel atomic substitution conversion strategy can be extended to the fabrication of other nonlayered 2D materials like CdSe. The proposed general pre-grown layered 2D precursor-directed atomic substitution conversion strategy may offer a new route to prepare large-size ultrathin nonlayered 2D materials.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21825103, 11774044, 52072059), the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2019CFA002), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019kfyXMBZ018 and 2020kfyXJJS050). We also thank the technical support from Analytical and Testing Center in Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Contributor Information
Liang Qiao, Email: liang.qiao@uestc.edu.cn.
Tianyou Zhai, Email: zhaity@hust.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Mounet N, Gibertini M, Schwaller P, Campi D, Merkys A, et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13:246. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Geim AK, Grigorieva IV. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature. 2013;499:419. doi: 10.1038/nature12385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kempt R, Kuc A, Heine T. Two-dimensional noble-metal chalcogenides and phosphochalcogenides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:9242. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou J, Lin J, Huang X, Zhou Y, Chen Y, et al. A library of atomically thin metal chalcogenides. Nature. 2018;556:355. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hong Y-L, Liu Z, Wang L, Zhou T, Ma W, et al. Chemical vapor deposition of layered two-dimensional MoSi2N4 materials. Science. 2020;369:670. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim S, Wang H, Lee YM. 2D nanosheets and their composite membranes for water, gas, and ion separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:17512. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mannix AJ, Kiraly B, Hersam MC, Guisinger NP. Synthesis and chemistry of elemental 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017;1:183. doi: 10.1038/s41570-016-0014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang F, Wang Z, Yin L, Cheng R, Wang J, et al. 2D library beyond graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides: a focus on photodetection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:6296. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00255j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang F, Wang Z, Shifa TA, Wen Y, Wang F, et al. Two-dimensional non-layered materials: synthesis, properties and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1603254. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201603254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Y, Zhang Z, Mao Y, Wang X. Two-dimensional nonlayered materials for electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13:3993. doi: 10.1039/D0EE01714K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun Y, Sun Z, Gao S, Cheng H, Liu Q, et al. Fabrication of flexible and freestanding zinc chalcogenide single layers. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:1057. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu R, Wang F, Liu L, He X, Chen J, et al. Band alignment engineering in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide-based heterostructures for photodetectors. Small Struct. 2021;2:2000136. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202000136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chang K, Liu J, Lin H, Wang N, Zhao K, et al. Discovery of robust in-plane ferroelectricity in atomic-thick SnTe. Science. 2016;353:274. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Song G, Gong W, Cong S, Zhao Z. Ultrathin two-dimensional nanostructures: surface defects for morphology-driven enhanced semiconductor SERS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:5505. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen Y, Liu K, Liu J, Lv T, Wei B, et al. Growth of 2D GaN single crystals on liquid metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:16392. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duan H, Yan N, Yu R, Chang C-R, Zhou G, et al. Ultrathin rhodium nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3093. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang S, Chen G, Ricciardulli AG, Zhang P, Zhang Z, et al. Topochemical synthesis of two-dimensional transition-metal phosphides using phosphorene templates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:465. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghidiu M, Lukatskaya MR, Zhao M-Q, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW. Conductive two-dimensional titanium carbide ‘clay’ with high volumetric capacitance. Nature. 2014;516:78. doi: 10.1038/nature13970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lukatskaya MR, Mashtalir O, Ren CE, Dall’Agnese Y, Rozier P, et al. Cation intercalation and high volumetric capacitance of two-dimensional titanium carbide. Science. 2013;341:1502. doi: 10.1126/science.1241488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guo Y, Peng J, Qin W, Zeng J, Zhao J, et al. Freestanding cubic ZrN single-crystalline films with two-dimensional superconductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:10183. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tallinen T, Aström JA, Kekäläinen P, Timonen J. Mechanical and thermal stability of adhesive membranes with nonzero bending rigidity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:26103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.026103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smith AR, Chao K-J, Niu Q, Shih C-K. Formation of atomically flat silver films on GaAs with a “silver mean” quasi periodicity. Science. 1996;273:226. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jia C, Li L, Liu Y, Fang B, Ding H, et al. Highly compressible and anisotropic lamellar ceramic sponges with superior thermal insulation and acoustic absorption performances. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3732. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17533-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xie Z, Xing C, Huang W, Fan T, Li Z, et al. Ultrathin 2D nonlayered tellurium nanosheets: facile liquid-phase exfoliation, characterization, and photoresponse with high performance and enhanced stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1705833. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201705833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cheng R, Wen Y, Yin L, Wang F, Wang F, et al. Ultrathin single-crystalline CdTe nanosheets realized via van der Waals epitaxy. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1703122. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wen Y, Wang Q, Yin L, Liu Q, Wang F, et al. Epitaxial 2D PbS nanoplates arrays with highly efficient infrared response. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:8051. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Q, Xu K, Wang Z, Wang F, Huang Y, et al. Van der Waals epitaxial ultrathin two-dimensional nonlayered semiconductor for highly efficient flexible optoelectronic devices. Nano Lett. 2015;15:1183. doi: 10.1021/nl504258m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Q, Safdar M, Xu K, Mirza M, Wang Z, et al. Van der Waals epitaxy and photoresponse of hexagonal tellurium nanoplates on flexible mica sheets. ACS Nano. 2014;8:7497. doi: 10.1021/nn5028104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jin B, Huang P, Zhang Q, Zhou X, Zhang X, et al. Self-limited epitaxial growth of ultrathin nonlayered CdS flakes for high-performance photodetectors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28:1800181. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201800181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu X, Huang P, Jin B, Zhang X, Li H, et al. Halide-induced self-limited growth of ultrathin nonlayered Ge flakes for high-performance phototransistors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:12909. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jin B, Liang F, Hu Z-Y, Wei P, Liu K, et al. Nonlayered CdSe flakes homojunctions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:1908902. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201908902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peng B, Cao K, Lau AHY, Chen M, Lu Y, et al. Crystallized monolayer semiconductor for ohmic contact resistance, high intrinsic gain, and high current density. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2002281. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pei K, Wang F, Han W, Yang S, Liu K, et al. Suppression of persistent photoconductivity of rubrene crystals using gate-tunable rubrene/Bi2Se3 diodes with photoinduced negative differential resistance. Small. 2020;16:2002312. doi: 10.1002/smll.202002312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:11169. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59:1758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blöchl PE. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50:17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ye X, Liu Y, Han Q, Ge C, Cui S, et al. Microspacing in-air sublimation growth of organic crystals. Chem. Mater. 2018;30:412. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Y, Yasar M, Luo Z, Zhou S, Yu Y, et al. Temperature difference triggering controlled growth of all-inorganic perovskite nanowire arrays in air. Small. 2018;14:1803010. doi: 10.1002/smll.201803010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ye X, Liu Y, Guo Q, Han Q, Ge C, et al. 1D versus 2D cocrystals growth via microspacing in-air sublimation. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:761. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08712-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang R, Muhammad Y, Xu X, Ran M, Zhang Q, et al. Facilitating all-inorganic halide perovskites fabrication in confined-space deposition. Small Methods. 2020;4:2000102. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202000102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Feng X, Sun Z, Pei K, Han W, Wang F, et al. 2D inorganic bimolecular crystals with strong in-plane anisotropy for second-order nonlinear optics. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2003146. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ai R, Guan X, Li J, Yao K, Chen P, et al. Growth of single-crystalline cadmium iodide nanoplates, CdI2/MoS2 (WS2, WSe2) van der Waals heterostructures, and patterned arrays. ACS Nano. 2017;11:3413. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yan Z, Yin K, Yu Z, Li X, Li M, et al. Pressure-induced band-gap closure and metallization in two-dimensional transition metal halide CdI2. Appl. Mater. Today. 2020;18:100532. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhou N, Gan L, Yang R, Wang F, Li L, et al. Nonlayered two-dimensional defective semiconductor γ-Ga2S3 toward broadband photodetection. ACS Nano. 2019;13:6297. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zheng W, Feng W, Zhang X, Chen X, Liu G, et al. Anisotropic growth of nonlayered CdS on MoS2 monolayer for functional vertical heterostructures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:2648. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504775. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cheng L, Xiang Q, Liao Y, Zhang H. CdS-based photocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11:1362. doi: 10.1039/C7EE03640J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wu X-J, Chen J, Tan C, Zhu Y, Han Y, et al. Controlled growth of high-density CdS and CdSe nanorod arrays on selective facets of two-dimensional semiconductor nanoplates. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:470. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen J, Wu X-J, Yin L, Li B, Hong X, et al. One-pot synthesis of CdS nanocrystals hybridized with single-layer transition-metal dichalcogenide nanosheets for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;127:1226. doi: 10.1002/ange.201410172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gao T, Wang T. Two-dimensional single crystal CdS nanosheets: synthesis and properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010;10:4995. doi: 10.1021/cg1010852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nakashima S-I, Yoshida H, Fukumoto T, Mitsuishi A. Raman spectra of CdCl2, CdBr 2 and CdI2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1971;31:1847. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.31.1847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lockwood DJ. Lattice vibrations of CdCl2, CdBr 2, MnCl2, and CoCl2: infrared and Raman spectra. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1973;63:374. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.63.000374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhu D-D, Xia J, Wang L, Li X-Z, Tian L-F, et al. Van der Waals epitaxy and photoresponse of two-dimensional CdSe plates. Nanoscale. 2016;8:11375. doi: 10.1039/c6nr02779b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gong C, Chu J, Yin C, Yan C, Hu X, et al. Self-confined growth of ultrathin 2D nonlayered wide-bandgap semiconductor CuBr flakes. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1903580. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.