Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
letter
. 2020 Jul 29;36(8):2478–2482. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06061-0

Waste in the Medicare Program: a National Cross-Sectional Analysis of 2017 Low-Value Service Use and Spending

Rachel O Reid 1,2,3,, John N Mafi 4,5, Lesley H Baseman 1, A Mark Fendrick 6,7, Cheryl L Damberg 5
PMCID: PMC8342744  PMID: 32728953

INTRODUCTION

Low-value health care services offer patients little to no clinical benefit, increase spending, and may cause patient harm. The Choosing Wisely® campaign and other efforts to reduce health care spending have focused attention on reducing waste since low-value services were last cumulatively assessed in Medicare in 2009.1 Other studies have addressed different populations or explored predictors of low-value service use and spending.26 In this analysis, we provide updated national estimates of low-value service use and spending in Medicare in 2017.

METHODS

We used Medicare claims and enrollment data for 100% of fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older continuously enrolled in parts A, B, and D for two years in 2017: 15,168,134 beneficiaries, requiring at least one and up to three years of claims history preceding the 2017 measurement year. We assessed 35 claims-based low-value service measures reflecting Choosing Wisely® recommendations and other professional guidelines using the Milliman MedInsight® Health Waste Calculator to categorize services as “wasteful,” “likely wasteful,” or “not wasteful.” We conservatively defined low-value services as “wasteful” services with sufficient claims history, excluding services billed in the inpatient claims file because we could not attribute spending to the low-value service itself. To provide a range, we calculated wasteful spending two ways: at the claim-line-level (allowed amount from only the claim-line or revenue center corresponding to a wasteful service, as applicable based upon the claim type) and at the claim-level (allowed amount from an entire claim with least one claim-line corresponding to a wasteful service).

RESULTS

Among the included beneficiaries, 5,389,619 (35.5%) had at least one low-value service, accounting for 10 million distinct services (0.66 per capita) (Table 1). The three most frequent services were as follows: opioids for acute low back pain (2.8 million, 28.5%), preoperative baseline laboratory studies (2.6 million, 25.6%), and oral antibiotics for acute upper respiratory or external ear infections (1.4 million, 13.9%)—comprising over two-thirds of low-value services measured (68%).

Table 1.

Low-Value Service Utilization Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries in 2017

Measure Distinct patients Low-value services total % of all low-value services Services per 1000 patients
Opioids for acute low back pain 1,034,398 2,840,389 28.45 187.26
Preoperative baseline laboratory studies in patients without significant systemic illness before elective low-risk surgery 2,005,139 2,558,495 25.63 168.68
Oral antibiotics for acute upper respiratory or external ear infections 1,131,131 1,384,931 13.87 91.31
NSAIDs in patients with hypertension, heart failure or chronic kidney disease 698,609 914,874 9.16 60.32
Unnecessary colorectal cancer screening in adults 50–75 years 444,658 479,535 4.80 31.61
Concurrent use of two or more antipsychotic medications 38,944 444,505 4.45 29.31
Screening for vitamin D deficiency 304,184 326,161 3.27 21.50
Cervical cancer screening in women not at high risk with adequate prior screening 264,285 272,123 2.73 17.94
Annual EKGs or cardiac screening in asymptomatic patients without risk factors 225,372 256,102 2.57 16.88
Preoperative EKG, chest x-ray and PFTs in patients without significant systemic illness before low-risk surgery 128,395 136,516 1.37 9.00
Cardiac stress testing or advanced imaging for asymptomatic patients without risk factors 89,878 93,046 0.93 6.13
Carotid duplex ultrasound for simple syncope with normal neurological exam 49,704 51,073 0.51 3.37
Imaging for uncomplicated headache without neurological symptoms 29,920 30,793 0.31 2.03
Imaging for acute low back pain without red-flag signs 30,129 30,199 0.30 1.99
Imaging for uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis 24,778 26,063 0.26 1.72
Coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients without risk factors 19,302 20,859 0.21 1.38
CT scans for emergency department evaluation of dizziness 18,407 18,577 0.19 1.22
Antidepressant monotherapy in bipolar disorder 9074 14,157 0.14 0.93
Brain imaging for simple syncope with normal neurological exam 13,570 13,791 0.14 0.91
PICCs in stage III-V chronic kidney disease patients without prior nephrology consult 12,689 13,465 0.13 0.89
Immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin E tests in the evaluation of allergy 11,221 12,137 0.12 0.80
CT head/brain for sudden onset hearing loss 10,413 10,572 0.11 0.70
Electroencephalography for headaches 8767 9011 0.09 0.59
Vertebroplasty 5355 6264 0.06 0.41
Renal artery revascularization 3098 3596 0.04 0.24
Antibiotics for adenoviral conjunctivitis without secondary infection or other conditions 3492 3572 0.04 0.24
Coronary artery calcium scoring for patients with known coronary artery disease 2983 2994 0.03 0.20
Preoperative echocardiography or stress test before low- or intermediate-risk non-cardiac surgery 1997 2079 0.02 0.14
PFTs before cardiac surgery without respiratory disease or symptoms 1864 1922 0.02 0.13
Routine diagnostic testing for chronic urticaria 1654 1654 0.02 0.11
Arthroscopic lavage and debridement for knee osteoarthritis 1437 1442 0.01 0.10
Bleeding time testing 1160 1310 0.01 0.09
MRI of peripheral joints to monitor rheumatoid arthritis 903 936 0.01 0.06
Multiple palliative radiation treatments in bone metastases 481 493 < 0.01 0.03
DEXA screening for osteoporosis in women younger than 65 or men younger than 70 475 479 < 0.01 0.03
Total 5,389,619 9,984,115 100 658.23

Cumulative low-value service spending varied from $723 million ($48 per capita) at the claim-line-level to $2.1 billion ($140 per capita) at the claim-level (Table 2). Spending per service varied from $6.32 for bleeding time testing at the claim-line-level to $7344.39 for renal artery revascularization at the claim-level (Table 2).

Table 2.

Low-Value Service Spending Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries in 2017

Claim-level spending (broad definition) Claim-line-level spending (narrow definition)
Measure Spending, total ($1 mil) % of all low-value spending Spending per service Spending per 1000 patients Spending, total ($1 mil) % of all low-value spending Spending per service Spending per 1000 patients
Preoperative baseline laboratory studies in patients without significant systemic illness before elective low-risk surgery 979.72 46.09 382.93 64,590.37 40.81 5.64 15.95 2690.71
Opioids for acute low back pain 187.94 8.84 66.17 12,390.21 187.94 25.98 66.17 12,390.21
Unnecessary colorectal cancer screening in adults 50–75 years 142.54 6.71 297.25 9397.36 79.48 10.99 165.75 5240.20
Concurrent use of two or more antipsychotic medications 141.94 6.68 319.32 9357.68 94.22 13.02 211.96 6211.47
Cardiac stress testing or advanced imaging for asymptomatic patients without risk factors 81.51 3.83 876.04 5373.87 64.29 8.89 690.98 4238.69
PICCs in stage III-V chronic kidney disease patients without prior nephrology consult 79.96 3.76 5938.60 5271.79 53.90 7.45 4003.17 3553.68
Preoperative EKG, chest x-ray and PFTs in patients without significant systemic illness before low-risk surgery 78.44 3.69 574.59 5171.46 4.52 0.62 33.08 297.76
Coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients without risk factors 77.08 3.63 3695.09 5081.43 49.08 6.78 2352.84 3235.59
Annual EKGs or cardiac screening in asymptomatic patients without risk factors 68.51 3.22 267.52 4516.94 5.83 0.81 22.76 384.34
Screening for vitamin D deficiency 44.04 2.07 135.02 2903.30 6.39 0.88 19.58 420.95
Carotid duplex ultrasound for simple syncope with normal neurological exam 33.78 1.59 661.34 2226.81 9.37 1.30 183.51 617.91
Cervical cancer screening in women not at high risk with adequate prior screening 31.79 1.50 116.83 2096.04 16.05 2.22 59.00 1058.46
NSAIDs in patients with hypertension, heart failure or chronic kidney disease 28.57 1.34 31.23 1883.72 28.57 3.95 31.23 1883.72
Renal artery revascularization 26.41 1.24 7344.39 1741.18 21.61 2.99 6009.81 1424.78
Brain imaging for simple syncope with normal neurological exam 17.72 0.83 1284.94 1168.28 2.43 0.34 176.52 160.49
Imaging for uncomplicated headache without neurological symptoms 17.42 0.82 565.60 1148.23 7.71 1.07 250.53 508.61
Oral antibiotics for acute upper respiratory or external ear infections 16.98 0.80 12.26 1119.52 16.98 2.35 12.26 1119.52
CT scans for emergency department evaluation of dizziness 16.92 0.80 910.87 1115.57 3.23 0.45 173.73 212.78
Vertebroplasty 15.13 0.71 2415.53 997.54 12.43 1.72 1984.15 819.40
Imaging for uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis 10.17 0.48 390.28 670.61 3.14 0.43 120.61 207.24
Imaging for acute low back pain without red-flag signs 6.40 0.30 211.91 421.91 2.82 0.39 93.50 186.15
Electroencephalography for headaches 6.35 0.30 704.43 418.49 4.30 0.59 477.12 283.45
CT head/brain for sudden onset hearing loss 3.37 0.16 318.55 222.02 1.64 0.23 154.74 107.85
Immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin E tests in the evaluation of allergy 2.46 0.12 203.06 162.48 0.84 0.12 69.34 55.48
Arthroscopic lavage and debridement for knee osteoarthritis 1.88 0.09 1307.13 124.27 1.88 0.26 1307.13 124.27
Bleeding time testing 1.80 0.08 1376.75 118.90 0.01 < 0.01 6.32 0.55
PFTs before cardiac surgery without respiratory disease or symptoms 1.38 0.06 716.49 90.79 0.03 < 0.01 14.13 1.79
Multiple palliative radiation treatments in bone metastases 1.35 0.06 2730.37 88.74 0.91 0.13 1854.31 60.27
Preoperative echocardiography or stress test before low- or intermediate-risk non-cardiac surgery 1.30 0.06 625.76 85.77 0.96 0.13 464.13 63.61
Coronary artery calcium scoring for patients with known coronary artery disease 0.92 0.04 308.16 60.83 0.76 0.11 254.64 50.26
Antidepressant monotherapy in bipolar disorder 0.78 0.04 55.14 51.46 0.78 0.11 55.14 51.46
Routine diagnostic testing for chronic urticaria 0.71 0.03 429.80 46.87 0.13 0.02 76.77 8.37
MRI of peripheral joints to monitor rheumatoid arthritis 0.34 0.02 361.89 22.33 0.29 0.04 306.57 18.92
Antibiotics for adenoviral conjunctivitis without secondary infection or other conditions 0.08 < 0.01 23.56 5.55 0.08 0.01 23.56 5.55
DEXA screening for osteoporosis in women younger than 65 or men younger than 70 0.05 < 0.01 96.47 3.05 0.03 < 0.01 55.11 1.74
Total 2125.74 100 212.91 140,145.38 723.46 100 72.46 47,696.24

At the claim-level, the three services representing the most spending were the following: preoperative baseline laboratory studies ($980 million, 46.1%), opioids for acute low back pain ($188 million, 8.8%), and unnecessary colorectal cancer screening ($143 million, 6.7%)—comprising nearly two-thirds of wasteful spending (62%).

At the claim-line-level, the three services representing the most spending were the following: opioids for acute low back pain ($188 million, 26.0%), concurrent use of two or more antipsychotic medications ($94 million, 13.0%), and unnecessary colorectal cancer screening ($79 million, 11.0%)—comprising half of wasteful spending (50%).

DISCUSSION

As of 2017, low-value services remain common and costly in Medicare. Over one-third of beneficiaries received at least one low-value service, resulting in excess spending and in potential patient harm (e.g., perforation, bleeding, or infection from unnecessary colorectal cancer screening). Utilization and spending are concentrated among a small subset of measured services, suggesting targeted opportunities for waste reduction. While the measures differ somewhat, our utilization and spending findings fall in a similar range to prior estimates in the Medicare population.1

Our study has limitations. Claims-based low-value service measures are inherently under-inclusive, capturing only the fraction of low-value services with professional consensus that are measurable via claims. They may be over-inclusive if claims cannot reflect the circumstances or history that make a given service high-value. We use two methods to calculate spending to present a potential range; both have limitations. Claim-line-level spending is specific but may miss related services on other claim-lines, underestimating wasteful spending. Claim-level spending is more sensitive but may include unrelated services billed on the same claim, overestimating wasteful spending. Both methods miss related services or downstream events billed on other claims.

Our findings suggest that targeted interventions to reduce low-value services—particularly the narrow subset responsible for the majority of spending—could substantially reduce wasteful Medicare spending. Interventions focused on this subset of low-value services may allow greater near-term progress in reducing waste in the health care system.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Reid had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. The authors acknowledge Scot Hickey and Mark Totten for their research programming. Milliman provided RAND free access to the Milliman MedInsight® Health Waste Calculator and technical assistance.

Funding Information

Rachel Reid, Lesley Baseman, and Cheryl Damberg’s work was supported through the RAND Center of Excellence on Health System Performance, which is funded through a cooperative agreement (1U19HS024067-01) between the RAND Corporation and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. John Mafi is supported by the UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) KL2 Award KL2TR001882 (PI: Mitchell Wong), Arnold Ventures, and the National Institutes on Aging R01AG059815-01 (PI: Catherine Sarkisian).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Fendrick is a co-developer of the Milliman MedInsight Health Waste Calculator and receives royalties from its sale. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to disclose.

Disclaimer

The content and opinions expressed in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schwartz AL, Landon BE, Elshaug AG, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM. Measuring low-value care in Medicare. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1067–1076. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reid RO, Rabideau B, Sood N. Low-value health care services in a commercially insured population. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1567–1571. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reid RO, Rabideau B, Sood N. Impact of consumer-directed health plans on low-value healthcare. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23(12):741–748. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mafi JN, Russell K, Bortz BA, Dachary M, Hazel WA, Jr, Fendrick AM. Low-cost, high-volume health services contribute the most to unnecessary health spending. Health Aff. 2017;36(10):1701–1704. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schpero WL, Morden NE, Sequist TD, Rosenthal MB, Gottlieb DJ, Colla CH. For Selected Services, Blacks And Hispanics More Likely To Receive Low-Value Care Than Whites. Health Aff. 2017;36(6):1065–1069. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwartz AL, Jena AB, Zaslavsky AM, McWilliams JM. Analysis of physician variation in provision of low-value services. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(1):16–25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES