The immunologic response following several varieties of vaccination (especially meningococcal C conjugate vaccines) has been described as a potential trigger for the development of nephrotic syndrome (NS) [1, 2]. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine, administered worldwide, appears to be safe. However, rare reports of both de novo and recurrent NS and vasculitis are emerging.
Vaccines for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed in an accelerated manner as a response to a pandemic. They use different mechanisms to generate immunity. Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 use a pioneer mechanism, a lipid nanoparticle nucleoside-modified mRNA that encodes SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, which medicates host attachment and viral entry. AstraZeneca uses a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector, containing the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Studied subjects generated T cell response, CD8+ and CD4+ expansion, to a Th1-biased response with production of Interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-2 and antibody (Ab) production predominantly of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG3 subclasses [3–5]. These immune responses might be associated with a recurrence of glomerular disease or as a possible trigger for podocytopathies.
To date, 11 NS [new onset (5 patients) and relapsed (6 patients)] linked to minimal change disease (MCD) (10 patients) or membranous nephropathy (1 patient) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccines—Pfizer BNT162b2 (4 patients, 3 patients), Moderna mRNA-1273 (1 patient, 0 patient), AstraZeneca (0 patient, 2 patients) or SINOVAC (0 patient, 1 patient) vaccine have been reported (Table 1) [6–15]. All cases appeared 3 days to 2 weeks after the first vaccine dose followed by remission under corticosteroid treatment, except in one patient with underlying diabetic change nephropathy [7].
Table 1.
Ref. | Country | Age/sex | Past medical history | SARS-CoV-2 vaccine | Onset of symptoms | Kidney findings | Anti-Spike protein antibody | Treatment | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[6] | Israel | 50/M | Healthy | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 10 days post first vaccine |
|
Positive 38.9 UI/mL | Prednisone 1 mg/kg |
|
[7] | USA | 77/M | DM, obesity, CAD | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 7 days post first vaccine |
|
NA | MP pulse 1 g daily, 3 days followed by oral prednisolone 60 mg daily |
|
[8] | The Netherlands | 80/M | VTE | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 7 days post first vaccine |
|
NA | Oral prednisolone 80 mg daily |
|
[9] | The Netherlands | 61/F |
|
Pfizer BNT162b2 | 8 days post first vaccine |
|
NA | Oral steroids (1 mg/kg/J) |
|
[10] | France | 34/F | Steroid-dependent MCD | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 10 days post first vaccine and few days post second vaccine |
|
NA | Oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg | Partial remission (UPCR 1.2 g/g). Received the second injection (27 days after the first one), with NS relapse a few days later (UPCR 3 g/g), leading to a new increase of steroid dose to 1 mg/kg that finally allowed complete remission |
[11] | Switzerland | 22/M | Steroid-dependent MCD | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 3 days post first vaccine |
|
|
|
|
[12] | Japan | 60/M | Steroid-sensitive MCD | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 8 days post first vaccine |
|
Positive, 196 U/mL | Prednisolone 20 mg daily + CSA 1000 mg daily | Remission within 2 weeks |
[13] | UK | 30/M | Steroid/tacrolimus-dependent MCD | AstraZeneca | Within 2 days post first vaccine |
|
NA | Prednisolone 20 mg daily |
|
[13] | UK | 40/F | Steroid/tacrolimus-dependent MCD | AstraZeneca | Within 2 days post first vaccine |
|
NA | Prednisolone 30 mg daily |
|
[14] | USA | 63/F | HT, tobacco | Moderna mRNA-1273 | Less than 1 week post first vaccine |
|
NA |
|
NA |
[15] | Turkey | 66/F |
|
SINOVAC | 2 weeks post first vaccine |
|
Positive | NA | NA |
Alb, albumin; SCr, serum creatinine; AKI, acute kidney injury; CAD: coronary artery disease; CSA, ciclosporin A; KB, kidney biopsy; ATI, acute tubular injury; MN, membranous nephropathy; AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; MP, methylprednisolone; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension; VTE, venous thromboembolism; M, male, F, female; UPCR, urine protein–creatinine ratio; Pu, proteinuria; AI hepatitis, auto-immune hepatitis; NA, not available.
As of this date, there are six cases of de novo crescentic glomerulonephritis after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines—[Pfizer BNT162b2 (2 patients), Moderna mRNA-1273 (4 patients)] described in the literature (Table 2) [16–19]. Two patients had a past medical history significant for hypertension. Kidney biopsies showed anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (Moderna mRNA-1273), IgA nephritis (Pfizer BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273) and anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease (Pfizer BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273), respectively, each 2 patients. All patients were treated with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide. Three and one patients required plasma exchange and rituximab, respectively. Two patients had improvement of symptoms and two remained in hemodialysis (Table 2) [16–19].
Table 2.
Ref. | Country | Age/sex | Past medical history | SARS-CoV-2 vaccine | Onset of symptoms | Kidney findings | Treatment | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[16] | Switzerland | 39/M | HTN | Moderna mRNA-1273 | Immediately after second dose |
|
High-dose glucocorticoids + CYC | Serum creatinine normalized, proteinuria decreased but persistent microhematuria |
[16] | Switzerland | 81/M | Healthy | Moderna mRNA-1273 | Shortly after second dose |
|
High-dose glucocorticoids + CYC and plasma exchange | Resolution of symptoms over 3 weeks with a decreased of PR3-ANCA |
[17] | USA | 52/M | HTN | Moderna mRNA-1273 | 2 weeks after second dose |
|
Rituximab initiated at 375 mg/m2 but developed adverse reaction One dose of CYC 7.5 mg/kg, prednisone | Worsening kidney function and hyperkalemia requiring hemodialysis |
[18] | USA | Elderly/F | Healthy | Moderna mRNA-1273 | 2 weeks after second dose |
|
Methylprednisolone, CYC, plasma exchange and hemodialysis | Remains dialysis-dependent |
[19] | Singapore | 41/F | Gestational diabetes | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 1 day after the second dose |
|
|
NA |
[19] | Singapore | 60/F | Hyperlipidemia | Pfizer BNT162b2 | 1 day after the second dose |
|
|
NA |
AKI, acute kidney injury; M, male, F, female; CYC, cyclophosphamide; GN, glomerulonephritis; HTN, hypertension; IF, immunofluorescence; I.V., intravenous; KB, kidney biopsy; PR3, proteinase 3; Pu, proteinuria; NA, not available; SCr, serum creatinine.
Vaccination (notably influenza) is a recognized trigger for the relapse of idiopathic NS [16] and ANCA-associated vasculitis [17]. Acute onset of MCD has been reported at 4 and 18 days following the influenza vaccine [1, 18] and 6 weeks following a tetanus–diphtheria–poliomyelitis vaccination [20, 21, 22]. The association between the timing of vaccination and the development of both new onset and relapsed MCD and/or membranous nephropathy raises questions as to the mechanisms involved. The strong temporal association with vaccination and MCD cases suggests a more generalized cytokine-mediated response [23] and/or a rapid T cell-mediated immune response to viral mRNA as a possible trigger for podocytopathy [13, 24]. The Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine is reported to induce robust T cell activation, as previously described, which might contribute to MCD. It is also possible that these phenomena are completely circumstantial and unrelated. Regardless, prompt initiation of steroid treatment should be considered. S protein data were not reported in most of the cases to raise the timing of the formation of the Ab and the glomerular disease finding. Is this more common than for the influenza vaccine? This cannot be answered at this moment as mass vaccination leads to clustering of rare side effects and true incidence is hard to define.
The mechanism of de novo ANCA-associated vasculitis post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine remains to be elucidated but the temporal association suggests a neutrophilic immune response to the S protein or mRNA of SARS-CoV-2 in predisposed individuals. It is possible that the vaccines lead to proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF and interleukin-1B, which can prime neutrophils leading to formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Persistent NETs and prolonged exposure to their contents can lead to disruption of tolerance and formation of Abs to myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3. This could be the mechanism of triggering an ANCA-associated vasculitis [25]. However, crescents may take time to form, suggesting an unrecognized underlying pre-existing glomerulonephritis was present at the time of receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, which more likely potentiated an immune response in the described patients. In addition, there is a seasonal variation of vasculitis that may be playing a role here as well [26], and not all related to the vaccine.
Reports of temporal and spatial clustering suggest that environmental factors such as infections may play a role in anti-GBM disease induction [27, 28]. Infectious associations, particularly with influenza A [29, 30], and high prevalence of prodromal upper and lower respiratory tract infection in a cohort of 140 Chinese patients [31] may account for the aforementioned seasonal or geographic ‘clustering’ of anti-GBM disease cases.
COVID-19 may be one such infection [32, 33], as suggested by a report of a cluster of cases in London during the current pandemic [34] with a 5-fold increased incidence. Although five of eight tested patients presenting with anti-GBM Ab were negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR, four had IgM and/or IgG Abs to SARS-CoV-2 S protein, raising the possibility that immune response to SARS-CoV-2 could be related to development of anti-GBM in some patients [34].
However, there is no anti-GBM case following vaccination reported in the literature. Therefore, one can ask the question about the seasonality of anti-GBM Ab and/or the possibility that these patients were already infected with COVID-19, since none of the patients reported had a serological test before vaccination. Whether current cases can be attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related immune response warrants investigation.
Pharmacovigilance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will be important to determine the incidence of these potential adverse events since many millions of doses of the various available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been administered worldwide. However, we also should be mindful that this may be a coincidence and not causation, and vaccinations should be continued in order to end the pandemic.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
K.D.J. is a consultant for Astex Pharmaceuticals, Natera, GlaxoSmithKline, ChemoCentryx and Chinook, a paid contributor to Uptodate.com and receives honorarium from the International Society for Nephrology and the American Society for Nephrology.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gutiérrez S, Dotto B, Petiti JP et al. Minimal change disease following influenza vaccination and acute renal failure: just a coincidence? Nefrologia 2012; 32: 414–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abeyagunawardena A, Goldblatt D, Andrews N et al. Risk of relapse after meningococcal C conjugate vaccine in nephrotic syndrome. Lancet 2003; 362: 449–450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E et al. COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses. Nature 2020; 586: 594–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 1920–1931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ewer KJ, Barrett JR, Belij-Rammerstorfer S et al. ; Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group. T cell and antibody responses induced by a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Nat Med 2021; 27: 270–278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lebedev L, Sapojnikov M, Wechsler A et al. Minimal change disease following the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; S0272-6386(21)00509-6; doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.D’Agati VD, Kudose S, Bomback AS et al. Minimal change disease and acute kidney injury following the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00493-2; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maas RJ, Gianotten S, van der Meijden WAG. An additional case of minimal change disease following the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Am J Kidney Dis 2021. (online ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weijers J, Alvarez C, Hermans MMH. Post-vaccinal minimal change disease. Kidney Int 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.06.004 (online ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kervella D, Jacquemont L, Chapelet-Debout A et al. Minimal change disease relapse following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00478-6; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schwotzer N, Kissling S, Fakhouri F. Letter regarding “Minimal change disease relapse following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine”. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00500-7; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Komaba H, Wada T, Fukagawa M. Relapse of minimal change disease following the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; S0272-6386(21)00627-2; doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morlidge C, El-Kateb S, Jeevaratnam P et al. Relapse of minimal change disease following the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Kidney Int 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.06.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holzworth A, Couchot P, Cruz-Knight W et al. Minimal change disease following the Moderna mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00501-9; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aydın MF, Yıldız A, Oruç A et al. Relapse of primary membranous nephropathy after inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccination. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00494-4; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anderegg MA, Liu M, Saganas C et al. De novo vasculitis after mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccination. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00554-8; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sekar A, Campbell R, Tabbara J et al. ANCA glomerulonephritis post Moderna COVID-19 vaccination. Kidney Int 2021; S0085-2538(21)00555-X; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sacker A, Kung V, Andeen N. Anti-GBM nephritis with mesangial IgA deposits after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Kidney Int 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tan HZ, Tan RY, Choo JCJ et al. Is COVID-19 vaccination unmasking glomerulonephritis? Kidney Int 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Banerjee S, Dissanayake PV, Abeyagunawardena AS. Vaccinations in children on immunosuppressive medications for renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2016; 31: 1437–1448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Toru W. Vasculitis following influenza vaccination: A review of the literature. Curr Rheumatol Rev 2017; 13: 188–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clajus C, Spiegel J, Bröcker V et al. Minimal change nephrotic syndrome in an 82 year old patient following a tetanus–diphteria–poliomyelitis vaccination. BMC Nephrol 2009; 10: 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sette A, Crotty S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell 2021; 184: 861–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kielstein JT, Termühlen L, Sohn J et al. Minimal change nephrotic syndrome in a 65-year-old patient following influenza vaccination. Clin Nephrol 2000; 54: 246–248 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakazawa D, Masuda S, Tomaru U et al. Pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions for ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 15: 91–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Draibe J, Rodo X, Fulladosa X et al. ; Grupo de Malalties Glomerulars de la Societat Catalana de Nefrologia (GLOMCAT). Seasonal variations in the onset of positive and negative renal ANCA-associated vasculitis in Spain. Clin Kidney J 2018; 11: 468–473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Canney M, O’Hara PV, McEvoy CM et al. Spatial and temporal clustering of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11: 1392–1399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McAdoo SP, Pusey CD. Clustering of anti-GBM disease: Clues to an environmental trigger? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11: 1324–1326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Perez GO, Bjornsson S, Ross AH et al. A miniepidemic of Goodpasture’s syndrome clinical and immunological studies. Nephron 1974; 13: 161–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilson CB, Smith RC. Goodpasture’s syndrome associated with influenza A2 virus infection. Ann Intern Med 1972; 76: 91–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gu QH, Xie LJ, Jia XY et al. Fever and prodromal infections in anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018; 23: 476–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Winkler A, Zitt E, Sprenger-Mähr H et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and recurrence of anti-glomerular basement disease: A case report. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22: 75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nahhal S, Halawi A, Basma H Sr et al. Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease as a potential complication of COVID-19: A case report and review of literature. Cureus 2020; 12: e12089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prendecki M, Clarke C, Cairns T et al. Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kidney Int 2020; 98: 780–781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]