Abstract
If a child has abdominal pain, it is important to evaluate the possibility of intestinal perforation caused by foreign objects such as fishbone. If a foreign agent is present, laparoscopic surgery is an effective method to remove the foreign objects.
Keywords: children, fishbone, intestinal perforation
If a child has abdominal pain, it is important to evaluate the possibility of intestinal perforation caused by foreign objects such as fishbone. If a foreign agent is present, laparoscopic surgery is an effective method to remove the foreign objects.

1. INTRODUCTION
Fishbone perforation is a severe complication that can cause peritonitis and damage to nearby organs. A case of fishbone perforation in a boy was misdiagnosed as appendicitis. The case we present is rare in children. A 5‐year‐old boy presented with right lower abdominal pain, mild fever, and constipation. He was diagnosed with acute appendicitis and was sent to the operating room for laparoscopic surgery. During surgery, the appendix was normal, and we discovered that a fishbone pierced the ileum wall. We removed that foreign object and sewed the intestine. He recovered well and was discharged after 7 days of treatment in stable condition. It is often difficult to diagnose intestinal perforation caused by a fishbone because the patient and family cannot remember the history of fishbone ingestion. Depending on the lesion location, children have different clinical characteristics, including constipation, abdominal pain, and anal pain. When a child has abdominal pain, a detailed history of eating and drinking, as well as a thorough physical examination and diagnostic imaging, is needed to make an accurate diagnosis.
Fishbone perforation has been described by several authors in the medical literature. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Perforation by fishbone is a dangerous condition that is seldom observed. Organ damage can result from intestinal perforation, particularly peritonitis, a severe medical condition that necessitates surgery. We present a case of fishbone perforation in a 5‐year‐old boy who was treated at Haiphong Children's Hospital, Vietnam.
2. CASE PRESENTATION
A 5‐year‐old boy with normal past medical history was admitted to Haiphong Children's Hospital with abdominal pain around the navel after having symptoms for 5 h. He also had a mild fever and an inability to pass stool or gas. On physical examination, the boy was conscious, able to communicate but tired, with a temperature of 37.5°C. His pulse rate was 100 beats per minute; his blood pressure was 90/60 mmHg; and the respiratory rate was 30 breaths per minute. His height was 100 cm, and he weighed 18 kg. All of these numbers were in the normal range for his age. The abdominal examination noted that he had abdominal distension and obvious abdominal muscle guarding in the right iliac and umbilical region. His complete blood count: the number of white blood cells was 14.8 × 109/L, neutrophils accounted for 75.8%, and serum C‐reactive protein (CRP) was 21 mg/L. The abdominal ultrasound result showed that his intestines contained fluid and increase motility. The abdominal X‐ray did not show abnormal images (See Figure 1).
FIGURE 1.

The patient's abdominal X‐ray
He was diagnosed with acute appendicitis and had had laparoscopic surgery. We saw little fluid around intestines through the laparoscopic camera, with no pseudomembrane, no Douglas fluid, and a normal appendix. While examining the ileum, we did not find Meckel's diverticulums but a sharp foreign object that punctured the intestine from the lumen of the intestine to the outside, about 35 cm from the ileum—cecum (See Figures 2 and 3). After that, we removed the foreign object, stitched the hole in the intestine, cleaned the abdomen, and closed incisions.
FIGURE 2.

Fishbone punctured the intestine from the lumen of the intestine to the outside
FIGURE 3.

Full image of the fishbone
The boy made a full recovery and was discharged in a satisfactory condition following 7 days of treatment
3. DISCUSSION
Fishbone perforation is rarely seen, especially in children. Although most foreign objects can be excreted within a week of entering the gastrointestinal tract, 1 , 5 1% of patients may still suffer from intestinal perforation if the fishbones were long or sharp. Moreover, it is complicated to make a precise diagnosis because patients or their families cannot make sure what foreign object they ate in their meals. So, these cases are often misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis.
Depending on the perforation's location, patients may have various clinical symptoms, including constipation, abdominal pain, and anal pain. A study reported that 95% of patients presented with abdominal pain, which is the most crucial symptom, 81% having a fever, and 39% having local peritonitis. 2 In most cases of intestinal perforation caused by a foreign object, the foreign agent is a fishbone with a pointed shape. In some countries or regions that prefer eating fish, gastric perforation or other complications caused by fishbone are very common. 6 While fish bones may induce intestinal perforation in any section of the intestine, it is more commonly seen in areas of physiological stenosis or intestinal transitions such as the ileum or rectosigmoid junction. 7 In a study, the probability of ileal perforation was 83%. 8 In another report, the perforation of the end of the ileum was 38.6%, but the jejunum rate was lower, just 14.3%. 5
Patients do not often think they could suffer from intestine perforation due to a fishbone. Therefore, it is hard for doctors to take a medical history of the disease. The fishbone is often only found during an imaging examination or surgical exploration. 6 Imaging examination is usually unreliable in the diagnosis of these cases. High‐density shadow, free gas, and abscess formation are often used to determine the presence of inflammatory changes or perforation. 9 However, the fishbone gradually penetrates the intestinal wall through extrusion. The perforation site is often covered by fibrin or adjacent intestines, limiting the outflow of intestinal contents and reducing the possibility of the free gas appearance in abdominal X‐ray films. 10 Free intestinal gas found in X‐ray films accounted for only 20% of patients. 8 In another study with 358 patients suffering from fishbone perforation, X‐rays were only 32% sensitive. 3 The fishbone is also affected by radiation doses, inflammatory tissues, or liquids around the damage. 4
This child's most essential symptoms were abdominal pain, clear abdominal muscle guarding in the right iliac region with constipation, and fever in our patient. Diagnostic imaging results were not sensitive. Therefore, this patient's symptoms are somewhat close to those of a patient with acute appendicitis, perhaps leading to a misdiagnosis of abdominal pain caused by acute appendicitis.
Gastroscopy and enteroscopy are popular methods to remove the gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Only 1% of cases need surgical excision. However, depending on the perforation site and clinical symptoms, treatment could be chosen through suture perforation site, bowel resection, or Hartman procedure. 8 Laparoscopic surgery caused less damage than traditional laparoscopic surgery, so it has gradually replaced the traditional method of abdominal open exploration. Currently, laparoscopic surgery is the preferred method of choice. 11 In our case, because there was no precise diagnosis, we chose laparoscopic surgery. During the surgery, we found a sharp fishbone punctured the intestine from the lumen of the intestine to the outside, about 35 cm from the ileum—cecum, and the patient's appendix was normal. We removed the fishbone, stitched the hole, cleaned the abdomen, and closed the incisions.
The boy recovered very well and was discharged after 7 days of treatment in stable condition. Nevertheless, after all of this, his family still cannot remember clearly that whether their son ate fish that day or not. All they can make sure that their family regularly ate fish for dinner.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Identifying a case of fishbone ingestion is difficult because patients often do not remember when they ate fish, especially children. Therefore, it is critical for parents to recall their children's food and drinking history. In the case of a child with acute abdomen, doctors have to ask carefully about eating and drinking histories, if they ate fish, chicken, and so on, or not. A clinical examination together with imaging diagnosis is necessary to make the most accurate diagnosis. When performing an inflammatory appendectomy, the abdomen should also be carefully examined.
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
When dealing with a child having an abdominal pain, it is important to evaluate the possibility of intestinal perforation caused by a foreign object such as a fishbone, in addition to appendicitis. If a foreign agent is present, laparoscopic surgery to remove the foreign objects and suture the gastrointestinal perforation is a common and effective method.
Families should not feed their children with fish that still has its bones inside. Parents need to remove all the bones from the fish before their child consumes it.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
SNN, TDN, LTV, and CNBH participated in the study design, protocol development, and performance, data analysis, interpretation of data, writing the manuscript, carrying out the clinical data collection and data analysis, and observing the patient during the treatment. TDN and CNBH performed laparoscopic surgery. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Approval for the study was obtained from Medical Ethics Council of Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, and informed consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
PATIENT CONSENT
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient and his parent for publication of these data and the accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the patient and his family in this study for their cooperation.
Ngoc Nguyen S, Duy Nguyen T, Tung Vu L, Ngoc Bao Hoang C. Intestinal perforation caused by fishbone in a child with the misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9:e04584. 10.1002/ccr3.4584
Funding information
None
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Song J, Yang W, Zhu Y, et al. Ingested a fish bone‐induced ileal perforation: a case report. Medicine. 2020;99(15):e19508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Emir S, Ozkan Z, Altinsoy HB, Yazar FM, Sozen S, Bali I. Ingested bone fragment in the bowel: two cases and a review of the literature. World J Clin Cases. 2013;1(7):212‐216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ngan JH, Fok PJ, Lai EC, Branicki FJ, Wong J. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion. Experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg. 1990;211(4):459‐462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetector‐row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(10):1918‐1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Rodriguez‐Hermosa JI, Codina‐Cazador A, Sirvent JM, Martin A, Girones J, Garsot E. Surgically treated perforations of the gastrointestinal tract caused by ingested foreign bodies. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(7):701‐707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Joglekar S, Rajput I, Kamat S, Downey S. Sigmoid perforation caused by an ingested chicken bone presenting as right iliac fossa pain mimicking appendicitis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2009;3:7385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Glasson R, Haghighi KS, Richardson G. Chicken bone perforation of a sigmoid diverticulum. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(6):448‐449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Singh RP, Gardner JA. Perforation of the sigmoid colon by swallowed chicken bone: case reports and review of literature. Int Surg. 1981;66(2):181‐183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Akhtar S, McElvanna N, Gardiner KR, Irwin ST. Bowel perforation caused by swallowed chicken bones–a case series. Ulster Med J. 2007;76(1):37‐38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pinero Madrona A, Fernandez Hernandez JA, Carrasco Prats M, Riquelme Riquelme J, Parrila PP. Intestinal perforation by foreign bodies. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(4):307‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Salky B. Laparoscopic retrieval of intraabdominal foreign bodies. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
