Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
letter
. 1994 Mar-Apr;99(2):201–202. doi: 10.6028/jres.099.016

Letter to the Editor: New Values for Silicon Reference Materials, Certified for Isotope Abundance Ratios

P De Bièvre 1, S Valkiers 1, H S Peiser 2
PMCID: PMC8345240  PMID: 37404709

Abstract

New isotope abundance and relative atomic mass (atomic weight) values — with low, hitherto unattained uncertainty — are reported for two previously described silicon reference materials using a well-known method with an improved isotope-ratio mass spectrometer. These new values are directly traceable to the SI, more specifically to the unit for amount of substance, the mole, and independent of the SI unit of mass and of the Avogadro constant. Besides the residual mass-spectrometric uncertainties, these new values depend in effect only on a recently published direct comparison of the cyclotron frequency in a Penning trap of 28Si+ with that of 12C+.

Keywords: absolute abundances, atomic weights, cyclotron frequencies, isotope abundances, isotope ratio mass spectrometry, isotope reference materials, Penning trap, relative atomic masses, reference material, silicon, silicon tetrafluoride


Two new silicon isotope reference materials (RMs) have previously been announced [1]: IRM-0172 in chips of a silicon crystal (distributed in samples of about 2 mmol) and IRM-0182 in the chemical form of SiO2 (distributed in samples of about 0.1 mol) [2]. An independent set of absolute measurements with an improved mass spectrometer [3] is now reported. Some further refinement of the gas mass-spectrometric measurement has been achieved. In that method SiF3+ ions generated from a synthetic mixture of highly enriched specimens of Si isotopes are compared with these ions from the RMs of proven internal homogeneity [4]. Improved data analysis has in the meantime also been developed and adopted for all "standard atomic weight" evaluations by the Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry [5].

The uncertainties of the measurements here described still depend mostly on the mass-spectrometrically derived isotope abundance ratios. However, these uncertainties now approach those of the best values of the relative atomic masses of the silicon isotopes. For these masses we have based our calculations on the recent direct comparison in a Penning trap of the cyclotron frequency of 28Si+ with that of 12C+ [6]. The derived 28Si mass is uncertain by only 1 × 10−8 and only 3 × 10−9 higher than the value recently published by Audi and Wapstra [7] with a marginally lower estimated uncertainty by taking other measurements into consideration. Uncertainties in recognized values for the atomic masses of 29Si and 30Si are negligible because of their low abundances in terrestrial silicons.

Table 1 summarizes the new results. Their significance rests on:

  1. the reduction of the uncertainties by one order of magnitude;

  2. the direct traceability of these values to the mole, the SI unit for amount of substance, involving only relative mass measurements of the enriched samples, without any absolute mass measurement based on the kilogram;

  3. the ability with these RMs to compare reliably silicon specimens at the 10−7 level of relative atomic mass (atomic weight) Ar(Si), a level at which many geological sources and processed materials can be differentiated;

  4. the reliable intercomparisons of these isotopic RMs with Si SRM 990 of NIST [8] enable the reduced uncertainty to be transferred to the latter without much loss. A value of Ar(Si) = 28.085 538 ±0.000 018 might be indicated compared with the NIST certified value from 1975 measurements of Ar(Si) = 28.085 526 ±0.000 056.

Table 1.

Isotopic composition and Ar(Si) for both RMs. Expanded uncertainties, U, are indicated under the digits to which they relate and are computed on a two standard deviation basis.

Abundance ratio IRMM-017 IRMM-018
New values Previous values [1] New values Previous values [1]
n(29Si)/n(28Si) 0.050 771 5
6 6
0.050 69
12
0.050 844 2
4 8
0.050 83
12
n(30Si)/n(28Si) 0.033 488 9
7 8
0.033 52
10
0.033 585 1
6 6
0.033 60
10

Amount (of substance) Fraction
28Si 0.922 287 7
8 6
0.922 33
14
0.922 144 0
7 0
0.922 14
14
29Si 0.046 825 9
5 8
0.046 75
11
0.046 885 7
4 2
0.046 88
11
30Si 0.030 886 4
7 0
0.030 92
8
0.030 970 3
5 8
0.030 98
8

Relative mean atomic mass (atomic weight) Ar(Si) 28.085 408
15
28.085 40
19
28.085 635
12
28.085 65
19

Biography

About the authors: P. De Bièvre is a PhD from Gent University and also Professor in Isotope Mass Spectrometry at Antwerpen University in addition to his position at IRMM. S. Valkiers received a degree in chemical engineering in 1976 from HIK College of Technology, Geel, Belgium. H. S. Peiser, now retired, was at one time Chief of the Crystal Chemistry Section at the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology). The National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency of the Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Footnotes

1

Formerly: Central Bureau for Nuclear Measurements.

2

After the renaming of the Institute, these are now labelled IRMM-017 and IRMM-018.

References

  • 1.Valkiers S, De Bièvre P, Lenaers G, Peiser HS. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 1991;96:617–619. doi: 10.6028/jres.096.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Valkiers S, Lenaers G, De Bièvre P. Characterization of Two Silicon Isotope Reference Materials. (IRMM Internal Report GE/R/MS/11/89). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Bièvre P, Valkiers S, Peiser HS, Schäfer F, Seyfried P. P.T.B.-Mitteil; 1994. in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seyfried P, Becker P, Kozdon A, Lüdicke F, Spieweck F, Stümpel J, Wagenbreth H, Windisch D, De Bièvre P, Ku HH, Lenaers G, Murphy TJ, Peiser HS, Valkiers S. Z Phys B. 1992;87:289–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schäfer F, Valkiers S, Taylor PDP, De Bièvre P. Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Phys. 1994 in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jertz R, Beck D, Bollen G, Emmes J, Kluge H-J, Schark E, Schwarz S, Schweighard, Sonne P. Physica Scripta. 1993;48:399–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Audi G, Wapstra AH. Nucl Phys. 1993;A565:1–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barnes IL, Moore LJ, Machlan LA, Murphy TJ, Shields WR. J Res Natl Bur Stand (US) 1976;79A:727–735. doi: 10.6028/jres.079A.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES