Skip to main content
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health logoLink to International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157869

The Lifestyle of Saudi Medical Students

Khalid A Bin Abdulrahman 1,*, Ahmad M Khalaf 1, Fahad B Bin Abbas 1, Omran T Alanezi 1
Editors: María M Morales Suárez-Varela1, Paul B Tchounwou1
PMCID: PMC8345573  PMID: 34360161

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate medical students’ lifestyle habits, including sleep quality, eating and drinking patterns, physical activity, and social status. Method: This research project is part two of a multi-institutional cross-sectional observational study conducted among medical students from six medical colleges in Saudi Arabia between September and December 2019. Results: 675 medical students were enrolled electively into the lifestyle study. About half of this number were male students and the majority were aged 18–24 years. Most students (87.6%) slept between 4–8 h a day and over 44% were dissatisfied with their sleep. Only 28.1% had three meals a day; about 40% of them usually or always skipped breakfast. A total of 44% usually or always ate fast food and 44.7% drank 2 L of water per day. Moreover, male students were significantly consuming more fast food than females, p < 0.001. The majority (63.3%) revealed they usually or always drink black coffee daily. Females were significantly more inclined to regular coffee consumption than males, p < 0.001. Only 4.3% exercised for 30 min or more daily. The majority (65%) of the students were introverted; they had few close friends. Yet, 81% were somewhat satisfied or satisfied with their social life. Male students were significantly more satisfied with their social life than females, p = 0.001. Only 4.6% smoked cigarettes daily whereas 7.1% smoked e-cigarettes daily. In contrast, only 0.3% used shisha (hookah) daily. Male medical students were substantially more inclined to e-cigarette use than females (p < 0.001). The top five leisure activities of a medical student were surfing social media (75.9%), watching movies (61.3%), hanging out with friends (58.1%), spending time with their family (55.4%), and browsing the Internet (53.6%). Female medical students were significantly more inclined to surf social media than male medical students, p = 0.022; also, watching movies was preferred for females compared to males, p = 0.006. Conclusion: This study revealed that the majority of these medical students in Saudi Arabia exhibited healthy lifestyles to some extent, and these health-promoting behaviors differed based on sex, especially concerning physical activity and eating patterns. The findings of this study provide relevant information for future actions that will be geared towards effectively decreasing the occurrence of chronic illnesses and improving future doctors’ well-being.

Keywords: Saudi Arabia, lifestyles, medical students, medical education

1. Introduction

The term lifestyle describes a particular person or group of people and the living conditions, behaviors, and habits that are typical of them or are chosen by them [1]. Lifestyle habits are important indicators of future well-being, productivity, and life expectancy. In a recently published meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, younger adults have more cardiovascular benefits from combined healthy lifestyle factors [2]. Since doctors represent a unique and remarkable human resource within a nation, improving and safeguarding physicians’ health through lifestyle modification is a health preservation strategy that is beneficial to society. Conservation of doctors’ health and well-being should begin when they start their training in medical school.

Most healthy lifestyle habits are cultivated early, are challenging to change, and are retained throughout life; the earlier such an action begins, the more compelling it will be [3]. It is usually a common perception that medical students have better information about healthy lifestyle habits when compared to non-medical students. However, there is no proof whatsoever to show that this information translates into preserving excellent well-being practices [4,5]. Lifestyle habits among medical students could be affected by worries, just as stress can affect students’ academic accomplishments. Propensities in any group of individuals will culminate in a positive outcome: healthy habits, or contrarily, prompting lifestyle disorders [6]. A sedentary lifestyle has precipitated an increase in the prevalence of dyslipidemia, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases [7,8].

Evaluating the quality of life of medical students can allow us to better understand their general well-being and lead to appropriate interventions to promote students’ quality of life. This could prevent psychological distresses and other pitfalls threatening students’ professional life, and ultimately improve the quality of care provided to future patients [9,10,11]. Almost all Saudi medical colleges have developed their curricula. The majority have adopted the new trends in teaching and learning that focus on active learning, problem-based learning, vertical and horizontal integration, and community-based oriented education [12,13,14,15].

There are many publications on lifestyle habits among university students [16,17,18,19,20,21]. However, in Saudi Arabia (KSA), there are scarcely any investigations depicting medical students’ knowledge and their view of healthy lifestyle habits [22]. Consequently, this study aims to describe medical students’ lifestyle habits in six medical schools in KSA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This research project is part two [23] of a multi-institutional survey. The study has two sections, a cross-sectional observational followed by research analysis on sex differences. The study was conducted among medical students at various medical colleges in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University IRB committee number 68-2019 dated 17 November 2019.

2.2. Participants and Sampling

All medical students of either sex of the pre-clinical and clinical years were invited by email through the vice-dean of academic affairs of the six medical colleges in Saudi Arabia. Two reminder emails and SMS weblink messages were sent to enhance the response rate. The data were collected from the medical students who responded from the six medical colleges; the four colleges situated in the Riyadh region include Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (Public University), King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (Public University), Alfaisal University (Private University), and King Saud University (Public University). King Abdulaziz University (Public University) is in Jeddah and Qassim University (Public University) in the Qassim region.

2.3. Study Questionnaire

The questionnaire was designed to study medical students’ lifestyle habits, including sleep quality, eating and drinking routine, physical activity, social status, and leisure activities.

The students were informed about the purpose of the study. Instructions regarding the questionnaires were provided to volunteering students. The confidentiality of information was also ensured. Once students voluntarily signed the informed consent, they were requested to fill in the study questionnaire.

The questionnaire was composed of three parts. Part I addressed the sociodemographic data, including age, sex, marital status, level of education, level of study, residence, grade point average, and university name.

Part II covered the smoking habits and the response ranged from 0 to 5 points, where 0 indicates never and 5 indicates daily.

The sleeping duration response ranged from 0 to 4 points, where 0 indicates the duration <4 h and 4 indicates >8 h. The sleeping satisfaction response ranged from 0 to 5 points, where 0 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied. Falling asleep easily response ranged from 0 to 5 points, where 0 indicates very difficult and 5 indicates very easily.

Eating habits included daily meals and responses ranged from 0 to 7 points, where 0 indicates breakfast and dinner and 7 indicates lunch only. Fast-food consumption and skipping breakfast response ranged from 0 to 5 points, where 0 indicates never and 5 indicates always. Daily drinking of two liters of water and drinking coffee per day responses ranged from 0 to 5 points, where 0 indicates never and 5 indicates always.

The physical exercise ≥30 min response ranged from 0 to 8 points, where 0 indicates never and 8 indicates daily. The student satisfaction with social life response ranged from 0 to 3 points, where 0 indicates not satisfied and 3 indicates satisfied. The questionnaire also included a question on what leisure activities medical students took part in.

Part III was devoted to studying habits and time management practices based on an already published piece of work [23]. The questionnaire was subjected to pilot testing by 25 students; some questions were modified accordingly. All 900 randomly selected students from all six medical schools were emailed to participate and reminded by emails and via an SMS web link.

2.4. Statistical Data Analysis

The means and standard deviations describe the continuous variables, and frequency and proportions were used to describe the categorical variables. Histograms and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test were used to assess the normality of continuous variables. The chi-squared test (χ2) of independence was used to assess the correlation between categorical variables, and the likelihood ratio adjusted chi-squared test and its associated p-values were quoted when the statistical assumptions of these statistical tests were violated. Multiple response dichotomy analysis was used to describe the questions measured with multiple option selection (select all that applies). SPSS IBM V20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the data analysis, and the statistical significance alpha level was considered at 0.050 level. Excel was used for creating figures and depictions.

3. Results

A total of 675 out of 900 medical students responded (75%) and were enrolled in the lifestyle study. They were from six medical schools in different Saudi universities. Table 1 summarizes the sociodemographic and academic characteristics of the study population.

Table 1.

The medical students’ sociodemographic and academic characteristics. N = 675.

Variables Frequency Proportion
Sex Female 301 44.6
Male 374 55.4
Age 18–24 614 91
25–34 61 9
Marital status Single 654 96.9
Married 61 3.1
Place of residency Student dormitory 24 3.6
Family residency 619 91.7
Privately rented house 32 4.7
College of medicine IMSIU 131 19.4
Alfaisal University 143 21.2
King Abdulaziz University 110 16.3
KSAU-HS 108 16
King Saud University 69 10.2
Qassim University 114 16.9
Level of education 1st year 150 22.2
2nd year 121 17.9
3rd year 118 17.5
4th year 90 13.3
5th year 136 20.1
Internship year 60 8.9
Level of study Pre-clinical phase (years 1–3) 271 40.1
Clinical phase (years 4–6) 404 59.9
Academic GPA <4 out of 5 196 29
≥4 out of 5 479 71

Table 2 shows the sleeping, eating, drinking, and exercising habits of the medical students. Most students (87.6%) slept between 4–8 h a day. Over 44% were dissatisfied with their sleep. However, 18.4% were happy with their sleep. Furthermore, 17.6% found it difficult or very difficult to fall asleep. Only 28.1% had three meals a day. About 40% of them usually or always skipped breakfast, while 44% usually or always ate fast food. Moreover, 44.7% drank 2 L of water per day.

Table 2.

The descriptive analysis of the medical students’ sleep, dietary, and exercise habits. N = 675.

Variables Frequency Proportion
Daily sleep hours <4 h 24 3.6
4–6 h 311 46.1
6–8 h 280 41.5
>8 h 60 8.9
Sleep satisfaction the previous month Very dissatisfied 75 11.1
Dissatisfied 226 33.5
Neither 205 30.4
Satisfied 124 18.4
Very satisfied 45 6.7
Falling asleep easily over the previous month Very difficult 27 4
Difficult 92 13.6
Neutral 193 28.6
Easy 232 34.4
Very easy 131 19.4
Daily meals Breakfast and dinner 82 12.1
Breakfast and lunch 124 18.4
Breakfast only 7 1
Breakfast, lunch, and dinner 190 28.1
Dinner only 28 4.1
Lunch and dinner 190 28.1
Lunch only 54 8
Fast food consumption Never 8 1.2
Rarely 107 15.9
Sometimes 260 38.5
Usually 216 32
Always 84 12.4
Daily drinking of 2 L of water Never 23 3.4
Rarely 153 22.7
Sometimes 197 29.2
Usually 169 25
Always 133 19.7
Skipping breakfast Never 93 13.8
Rarely 158 23.4
Sometimes 155 23
Usually 152 22.5
Always 117 17.3
Drinking coffee per day Never 58 8.6
Rarely 82 12.1
Sometimes 108 16
Usually 108 16
Always 319 47.3
Exercising ≥30 min Never 113 16.7
Very rarely 168 24.9
Once per Month 38 5.6
Few times per month 81 12
About once a week 58 8.6
A few times per week 131 19.4
Five days a week 57 8.4
Daily 29 4.3

Table 3 displays the descriptive analysis of the medical students’ social activities and smoking habits. The majority (65%) of the students were introverted, they enjoyed being isolated or they had a few close friends only. A total of 81% were somewhat satisfied or satisfied with their social life. Only 4.6% smoked cigarettes daily, whereas 7.1% smoked e-cigarettes daily. In contrast, only 0.3% used shisha (hookah) daily.

Table 3.

The descriptive analysis of the medical students’ social activity and smoking habits. N = 675.

Variables Frequency Proportion
Social status Introvert 439 65
Extrovert 236 35
Not satisfied 127 18.8
Somewhat satisfied 295 43.7
Satisfied 253 37.5
Cigarette smoking Never 586 86.8
Rarely 40 5.9
Once per week 7 1
Few times per week 11 1.6
Daily 31 4.6
Electronic cigarette Never 582 86.2
Rarely 26 3.9
Once per week 4 0.6
Few times per week 15 2.2
Daily 48 7.1
Shisha smoking Never 583 86.4
Rarely 77 11.4
Once per week 11 1.6
Few times per week 2 0.3
Daily 2 0.3

Table 4 showed the bivariate analysis of lifestyle characteristics across sex. The daily eating habits differed significantly between male and female medical students, p < 0.001. Moreover, male students were significantly more inclined to consume fast foods than females, p < 0.001. The majority (63.3%) revealed they usually or always drink black coffee daily. Females were significantly more inclined to regular coffee consumption than males, p < 0.001. Surprisingly, only 4.3% exercised for 30 min or more daily. Male students were significantly more satisfied with their social life than females, p = 0.001. Male medical students were significantly more inclined to daily smoking than female medical students, p = 0.001 according to a likelihood ratio adjusted chi-squared test. Additionally, male medical students were substantially more inclined to e-cigarette use than females (p < 0.001).

Table 4.

Bivariate analysis of lifestyle characteristics across sex. N = 675.

Variables Student Sex Frequency (Proportion)
Female Male Test Statistic p-Value
Level of study Pre-clinical phase (years 1–3) 145 (48.2) 126 (33.7) χ2(1) = 14.64 <0.001
Clinical phase (4th–6th years) 156 (51.8) 248 (66.3)
Meals daily Breakfast and dinner 36 (12) 46 (12.3) χ2 (6) = 51.64 <0.001
Breakfast and lunch 83 (27.6) 41 (11)
Breakfast only 6 (2) 1 (0.3)
Breakfast, lunch, and dinner 71 (23.6) 119 (31.8)
Dinner only 14 (4.7) 14 (3.7)
Lunch and dinner 60 (19.9) 130 (34.8)
Lunch only 31 (10.3) 23 (6.1)
Fast food consumption Never 6 (2) 2 (0.5) χ2 (4) = 23.4
LR
<0.001
Rarely 57 (18.9) 50 (13.4)
Sometimes 125 (41.5) 135 (26.1)
Usually 93 (30.9) 123 (32.9)
Always 20 (6.6) 64 (17.1)
Daily drinking 2 L of water Never 17 (5.6) 6 (1.6) χ2 (4) = 45.61 <0.001
Rarely 93 (30.9) 60 (16)
Sometimes 95 (31.6) 102 (27.3)
Usually 56 (18.6) 113 (30.2)
Always 40 (13.3) 93 (24.9)
Coffee consumption per day Never 20 (6.6) 38 (10.2) χ2 (4) = 21.45 <0.001
Rarely 31 (10.3) 51 (13.6)
Sometimes 39 (13.0) 69 (18.4)
Usually 39 (13.0) 69 (18.4)
Always 172 (57.1) 147 (39.3)
Satisfied/Happy with social life Not satisfied 71 (23.6) 56 (15) χ2 (2) = 14.08 0.001
Somewhat satisfied 138 (45.8) 157 (42.0)
Satisfied 92 (30.6) 161 (43.0)
Cigarette smoking Never 276 (91.7) 310 (82.9) χ2 (4) = 17.58
LR
0.001
Rarely 16 (5.3) 24 (6.4)
Once per week 1 (0.3) 6 (1.6)
Few times per week 3 (1.0) 8 (2.1)
Daily 5 (1.7) 26 (7.0)
Electronic cigarette smoking Never 276 (91.7) 306 (81.8) χ2 (4) = 26.75
LR
<0.001
Rarely 13 (4.3) 13 (3.5)
Once per week 1 (0.3) 3 (0.8)
Few times per week 5 (1.7) 10 (2.7)
Daily 6 (2.0) 42 (11.2)

The top five leisure activities of the medical students are listed in Figure 1. Female medical students were significantly more inclined to surf social media than male medical students, p = 0.022; also, watching movies was preferred for females compared to males, p = 0.006 according to the chi-squared test of association. Regarding the medical students’ social, smoking, and leisure activity characteristics, the analysis findings suggested that social type (extroversion) did not differ significantly between male and female students, p = 0.0716. There was no significant association between lifestyle habits and other demographic characteristics, namely marital status, residence location, designated school of medicine, and GPA. Part one of the study questionnaire focused on the study habits of highly effective medical students. The results showed a significant correlation between study habits and students’ academic accomplishments. The top ten study habits of highly effective medical students were described in detail in a previous publication [23].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The top five leisure activities of medical student.

4. Discussion

College life is a conceivably important objective for the endorsement of a youthful adult populace’s healthy lifestyle. It is not surprising that this study showed statistically significant differences between male and female students in Saudi medical colleges. Male students tend to go out more, play sports, enjoy spending time with friends, play electronic games, surf the Internet, and use social media. At the same time, female students tend to spend most of their time studying, preparing for exams, isolating themselves for the sake of achievement, surfing the net, intermittent shopping, and having limited friendships. As Islam is the official religion of Saudi Arabia, the culture and religion impact Saudi medical students. Female students had relatively fewer outdoor activities as compared to male students. This could be explained by the fact that Saudi families sympathize with supporting and protecting their female medical students. Therefore, they tend to prove that they can achieve as much as their counterpart male students. However, many factors can explain this difference, such as the stable extrinsic environment in Saudi Arabia in terms of political, economic, religious, and well-balanced cohesive society supporting students’ psychological well-being [9].

The sex-specific distinction was perceived in terms of the students’ nutritional and lifestyle knowledge and attitude, as shown in previous studies, which reported that female students accomplished better scores than male students on nutritional knowledge and perspective [24]. There was not much difference in hours slept per day between the two sexes; 49.2% of the female students slept 4–6 h daily compared to 43.6% of the male students. Furthermore, 37.9% of the females slept 6–8 h per day compared to 44.4% of the males (p = 0.258). Regarding sleep satisfaction, only a small proportion was satisfied in the female group (15.3%) and the male group (20.9%) (p = 0.103). Most of the students had no problems falling asleep at night (p = 0.182). Another similar study conducted on medical students showed that the average sleep duration was 6–8 h [25]. In 2002, the National Sleep Foundation poll revealed that Americans’ average sleep duration was 6.9 h per weeknight [26], which was considered a positive habit. For the nutritional status, 23.6% of female students had breakfast, lunch, and dinner while in the male group, the proportion was 31.8%. However, the number of female students who had lunch and dinner was 19.9% compared to 34.8% for male students. Furthermore, female students had a higher proportion for breakfast and lunch only (27.5%) compared to 11% for the males (p ≤ 0.001). Regarding fast food consumption, both groups had similar proportion values since the majority of both sexes chose the options “sometimes” and “usually” (p ≤ 0.001). However, this does not pertain to the daily consumption of 2 L of water since 30.9% of females rarely drank 2 L of water compared to 16% of males. Furthermore, 18.6% of the female students usually drink 2 L of water compared to 30.2% of male students (p ≤ 0.001). Interestingly, only a small proportion of both groups always skip breakfast (p = 0.528). These results are comparable to a study conducted on Chinese medical students. The outcomes showed that most students (83.6%) reported taking meals regularly, with 79.0% eating meals three times daily. There were no differences in terms of sex. However, a noteworthy sex difference was observed in response to questions bordering on how often they had breakfast. A total of 66.8% of males and 82.3% of females reported having breakfast regularly (p < 0.0006) [2]. The skipping of breakfast has been associated with lower nutritional status and cardiovascular diseases [27]. It has also been reported that inappropriate breakfast habits may lead to the appearance and progression of obesity [28]. Regarding fast food consumption, a study was conducted on Saudi medical students in Dammam. The results showed that 91.3% admitted to eating fast foods. Approximately 25% ate fast food twice or less every week, while 85% of males ate it three times or more every week [5]. The evidence has clearly shown that fast food consumption is well related to the onset of cardiovascular disease [29,30]. Daily caffeine consumption between the two groups did not differ much; the proportion of the female students who drank coffee daily was 57.1% compared to 39.3% of the male students (p ≤ 0.001). The results aligned with other studies which also showed that medical students drank one coffee per day [27,31]. Regarding physical activity, we asked the students if they engaged in exercise for 30 min or more. The results showed that most of the female students rarely engaged in exercise (29.2%) compared to 21.4% among the male students. We also found that only 16.9% of the females exercised a few times per week compared to 21.4% of male students. Surprisingly, the study showed that 18.3% had never exercised among the female group compared to 15.5% among the male group (p = 0.138). Diminished degrees of physical activity are associated with an increase in the prevalence of an overweight condition, obesity, and diet-related non-communicable diseases among the young [32,33]. The two main barriers identified by medical students from most investigations were stress and lack of time [19,21]. Different studies have suggested that most medical students report not having sufficient time to exercise and eat healthier meals because of their courses and clinical rotation demands [32,34]. Regarding the social status of the students, female students were primarily introverted (65.8%) and male students were also predominantly introverted (64.4%) (p = 0.716). The female students also expressed that they were somewhat satisfied with their social life (45.8%) compared to 42% in the male group; 30.6% of female students were satisfied compared to 43% in the male group (p = 0.001). Introverted students may consider specific teaching settings more complicated than extroverted and outgoing students; these settings include group discussions with more than a few colleagues, locations where the establishment of fast relationships with students is expected, and environments where thoughts need to be offered rapidly or decisively [35]. There was not much difference between the two groups vis-à-vis smoking habits since the majority in both groups do not smoke cigarettes (p = 0.001), electronic cigarettes (p ≤ 0.001), or shisha (p = 0.032). A prior study indicated that friends’ influence is the principal reason for smoking among college students, followed by stress, curiosity, and imitation of smokers [36]. In different studies carried out in other countries, peer pressure was also identified as a reason for smoking [37,38]. Thus, peer pressure among students is a definite factor in beginning the habit. Concerning psychological pressure, comparative findings were additionally reported in different nations [39]. Furthermore, most non-smokers reported that religion was the principal factor against smoking, followed by well-being consideration and smoking control policies [36]. During spare time activities, the proportion of female students who browsed social media was somewhat similar (80.1%) compared to male students (72.5%) (p = 0.022). The number of male students who played video games was 51.1% compared to 15% of the female students (p ≤ 0.001). The proportion of female students who engaged in their favorite hobbies was slightly higher (30.2%) compared to the male students (27.5%) (p = 0.442). Furthermore, the number of females who read non-medical books was 33.6% compared to 21.7% of the male group (p = 0.001). It has been recognized that the nature of clinical training is generally distressing, and the pressure cannot be reduced [40]. Thus, it is imperative to analyze medicinal and preventive stress intervention practices in the medical curriculum. One investigation suggested that students with negative perspectives toward free-time activities were the ones who reported encountering the most pressure. Since medical training stresses do not significantly reduce in actual practice, students who fail to figure out how to adapt to stress early may become miserable, unhealthy physicians [41].

5. Limitations

No validated instruments were used, and questions arose from a brainstorming session created by authors. All data were self-reported and subject to reporting bias. Furthermore, the investigation report provided here was established based on the bivariate comparison (female versus male medical students). Another limitation is that a student may comprehend each question distinctly. Thus, their answer might be based on their understanding of the question.

6. Conclusions

The findings revealed that the vast majority of the medical students in Saudi Arabia exhibit healthy lifestyles to some extent, and these health-promoting behaviors differed by sex, especially regarding physical activity and eating patterns. The outcomes obtained here provide relevant information for future actions geared towards effectively decreasing chronic illnesses and improving population well-being.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.B.A. and A.M.K.; methodology, F.B.B.A.; software, O.T.A.; validation, K.A.B.A., A.M.K. and F.B.B.A.; formal analysis, K.A.B.A.; investigation, A.M.K.; resources, F.B.B.A.; data curation, O.T.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.K.; writing—review and editing, K.A.B.A.; visualization, F.B.B.A.; supervision, K.A.B.A.; project administration, K.A.B.A.; funding acquisition, K.A.B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University IRB committee number 68-2019 dated 17 November 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

The students were informed about the purpose of the study. Instructions regarding the questionnaires were provided to volunteering students. The confidentiality of information was also ensured. Once students voluntarily signed the informed consent, they were requested to fill in the study questionnaire.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Lifestyle Habit Definition and Meaning Collins English Dictionary. [(accessed on 14 July 2021)]; Available online: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/lifestyle-habit.
  • 2.Tsai M.-C., Lee C.-C., Liu S.-C., Tseng P.-J., Chien K.-L. Combined healthy lifestyle factors are more beneficial in reducing cardiovascular disease in younger adults: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:18165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75314-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carter A.O., Elzubeir M., Abdulrazzaq Y.M., Revel A.D., Townsend A. Health and lifestyle needs assessment of medical students in the United Arab Emirates. Med. Teach. 2003;25:492–496. doi: 10.1080/01421590310001605633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davarinejad O., Hosseinpour N., Majd T.M., Golmohammadi F., Radmehr F. The relationship between Life Style and mental health among medical students in Kermanshah. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2020;9:264. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_534_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sakamaki R., Toyama K., Amamoto R., Liu C.-J., Shinfuku N. Nutritional knowledge, food habits and health attitude of Chinese university students—A cross-sectional study. Nutr. J. 2005;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Qahtani M.H. Dietary Habits of Saudi Medical Students at the University of Dammam. Int. J. Health Sci. 2016;10:353–362. doi: 10.12816/0048729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park J.H., Moon J.H., Kim H.J., Kong M.H., Oh Y.H. Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2020;41:365–373. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grygiel-Górniak B., Tomczak A., Krulikowska N., Przysławski J., Seraszek-Jaros A., Kaczmarek E. Physical activity, nutritional status, and dietary habits of students of a medical university. Sport Sci. Health. 2016;12:261–267. doi: 10.1007/s11332-016-0285-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malibary H., Zagzoog M.M., Banjari M.A., Bamashmous R.O., Omer A.R. Quality of Life (QoL) among medical students in Saudi Arabia: A study using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument. BMC Med. Educ. 2019;19:344. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1775-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pagnin D., de Queiroz V. Comparison of quality of life between medical students and young general populations. Educ. Health. 2015;28:209–212. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.178599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang Y., Qu B., Lun S., Wang D., Guo Y., Liu J. Quality of life of medical students in China: A study using the WHOQOL-BREF. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e49714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bin Abdulrahman K., Harden R., Patrício M. Medical education in Saudi Arabia: An exciting journey. Med. Teach. 2012;34:S4–S5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.660509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khalid B.A.A. The current status of medical education in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Ann. Saudi Med. 2008;28:83–88. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2008.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aldayel A.A., Alali A.O., Altuwaim A.A., Alhussain H.A., Aljasser K.A., Bin Abdulrahman K.A., Alamri M.O., Almutairi T.A. Problem-based learning: Medical students’ perception toward their educational environment at Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 2019;10:95–104. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S189062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liew S.-C., Sidhu J., Barua A. The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Med. Educ. 2015;15:44. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Machul M., Bieniak M., Chałdaś-Majdańska J., Bąk J., Chrzan-Rodak A., Mazurek P., Pawłowski P., Makuch-Kuśmierz D., Obuchowska A., Bartoszek A., et al. Lifestyle Practices, Satisfaction with Life and the Level of Perceived Stress of Polish and Foreign Medical Students Studying in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dragun R., Veček N.N., Marendić M., Pribisalić A., Đivić G., Cena H., Polašek O., Kolčić I. Have Lifestyle Habits and Psychological Well-Being Changed among Adolescents and Medical Students Due to COVID-19 Lockdown in Croatia? Nutrients. 2020;13:97. doi: 10.3390/nu13010097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.El Ansari W., Salam A., Suominen S. Prevalence and Socio-Demographic, Academic, Health and Lifestyle Predictors of Illicit Drug/s Use among University Undergraduate Students in Finland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:5094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martinez-Lacoba R., Pardo-Garcia I., Amo-Saus E., Escribano-Sotos F. Socioeconomic, demographic and lifestyle-related factors associated with unhealthy diet: A cross-sectional study of university students. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6149-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Navarro-Prado S., Schmidt-RioValle J., Montero-Alonso M.A., Fernández-Aparicio Á., González-Jiménez E. Unhealthy Lifestyle and Nutritional Habits Are Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases Regardless of Professed Religion in University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:2872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen J., Xiang H., Jiang P., Yu L., Jing Y., Li F., Wu S., Fu X., Liu Y., Kwan H., et al. The Role of Healthy Lifestyle in the Implementation of Regressing Suboptimal Health Status among College Students in China: A Nested Case-Control Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017;14:240. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alissa E.M., Alsawadi H., Zedan A., AlQarni D., Bakry M., Bin Hli N. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Dietary and Lifestyle Habits Among Medical Students in King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. IJNFS. 2015;4:650. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150406.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bin Abdulrahman K.A., Khalaf A.M., Bin Abbas F.B., Alanazi O.T. Study Habits of Highly Effective Medical Students. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 2021;12:627–633. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S309535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Frank E., Carrera J., Elon L., Hertzberg V. Basic Demographics, Health Practices, and Health Status of U.S. Medical Students. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006;31:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hendrie G.A., Coveney J., Cox D. Exploring nutrition knowledge and the demographic variation in knowledge levels in an Australian community sample. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:1365–1371. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008003042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Swanson L.M., Arnedt J.T., Rosekind M.R., Belenky G., Balkin T.J., Drake C. Sleep disorders, and work performance: Findings from the 2008 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America poll: Sleep disorders and work performance. J. Sleep Res. 2011;20:487–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00890.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sakata K., Matumura Y., Yoshimura N., Tamaki J., Hashimoto T., Oguri S., Okayama A., Yanagawa H. [Relationship between skipping breakfast and cardiovascular disease risk factors in the national nutrition survey data] Jpn. J. Public Health. 2001;48:837–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ortega R.M., Redondo M.R., López-Sobaler A.M., Quintas M.E., Zamora M.J., Andrés P., Encinas-Sotillos A. Associations between obesity, breakfast-time food habits and intake of energy and nutrients in a group of elderly Madrid residents. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1996;15:65–72. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1996.10718566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heidemann Christin Schulze Matthias B., Franco Oscar H., van Dam Rob M., Mantzoros Christos S., Frank B.H. Dietary Patterns and Risk of Mortality From Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and All Causes in a Prospective Cohort of Women. Circulation. 2008;118:230–237. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.771881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nettleton J.A., Polak J.F., Tracy R., Burke G.L., Jacobs D.R. Dietary patterns and incident cardiovascular disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009;90:647–654. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.U.S. Census Bureau American Factfinder. [(accessed on 20 March 2021)];2003 Available online: https://www.google.com.sa/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=PWFrVI-CCKyG8QeA3ID4Cw&gws_rd=ssl.
  • 32.Troyer D., Ullrich I.H., Yeater R.A., Hopewell R. Physical activity and condition, dietary habits, and serum lipids in second-year medical students. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1990;9:303–307. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1990.10720384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Du S., Lu B., Zhai F., Popkin B.M. A new stage of the nutrition transition in China. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5:169–174. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Conroy M.B., Delichatsios H.K., Hafler J.P., Rigotti N.A. Impact of a preventive medicine and nutrition curriculum for medical students. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004;27:77–80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davidson B., Gillies R.A., Pelletier A.L. Introversion and Medical Student Education: Challenges for Both Students and Educators. Teach. Learn. Med. 2015;27:99–104. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.979183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Almutairi K.M. Smoking Among Saudi Students: A Review of Risk Factors and Early Intentions of Smoking. J. Community Health. 2014;39:901–907. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9909-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oh D.L., Heck J.E., Dresler C., Allwright S., Haglund M., Del Mazo S.S., Kralikova E., Stucker I., Tamang E., Gritz E.R., et al. Determinants of smoking initiation among women in five European countries: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rudatsikira E., Muula A.S., Siziya S. Current cigarette smoking among in-school American youth: Results from the 2004 National Youth Tobacco Survey. Int. J. Equity Health. 2009;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Warren C.W., Sinha D.N., Lee J., Lea V., Jones N.R. Tobacco use, exposure to secondhand smoke, and cessation counseling among medical students: Cross-country data from the Global Health Professions Student Survey (GHPSS), 2005–2008. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eysenck M.W. Anxiety, learning, and memory: A reconceptualization. J. Res. Personal. 1979;13:363–385. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(79)90001-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Folse M.L., DaRosa D.A., Folse R. The relationship between stress and attitudes toward leisure among first-year medical students. J. Med. Educ. 1985;60:610–617. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198508000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES