Abstract
Promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein is the core component of subnuclear structures called PML nuclear bodies that are known to play important roles in cell survival, DNA damage responses, and DNA repair. Fanconi anemia (FA) proteins are required for repairing interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs). Here we report a novel role of PML proteins, regulating the ICL repair pathway. We found that depletion of the PML protein led to the significant reduction of damage-induced FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and FANCD2 foci formation. Consistently, the cells treated with siRNA against PML showed enhanced sensitivity to a crosslinking agent, mitomycin C. Further studies showed that depletion of PML reduced the protein expression of FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 via reduced transcriptional activity. Interestingly, we observed that damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation was severely impaired in cells with depleted PML, and we demonstrated that CHK1 regulates FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 transcription. Finally, we showed that inhibition of CHK1 phosphorylation further sensitized cancer cells to mitomycin C. Taken together, these findings suggest that the PML is critical for damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation, which is important for FA gene expression and for repairing ICLs.
Keywords: PML nuclear body, Fanconi anemia, interstrand DNA crosslink, CHK1 inhibitors
1. Introduction
The promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene was first discovered as a fusion partner of retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) in acute promyelocytic leukemia [1]. PML protein is the core component of multifaceted subnuclear structures known as PML nuclear bodies (PML NBs) that are implicated in the regulation of cellular functions including cell proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, tumor suppression, DNA repair, and DNA damage responses [2,3,4,5,6]. PML NBs of subnuclear spherical structure ranging from 0.1 to 1 μm in diameter contain diverse annotated domains, allowing them to interact with a variety of binding partners and facilitates their functions [2,7,8]. Based on more than a decade of studies, PML NBs are functionally associated with over 160 proteins directly and indirectly [3,9]. Seven PML isoforms, I~VIIb, have been characterized by their C-terminal ends, which determine their specific functions [10]. It was reported that the C-terminal of PML IV interacts with p53, which leads to the recruitment of p53 to PML NBs [11]. PML is also important for damage-induced MRE11, BRCA1, and RPA foci formation, which is essential for DNA double-strand break repair [12].
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare recessive genetic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure, congenital malformations, and cancer predisposition [13,14]. Under cellular study, cells obtained from FA patients are hypersensitive in response to mitomycin C (MMC), which induces interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs) [15]. To date, researchers have identified loss-of-function mutations of 22 genes in FA patients. Among them, nine FA proteins, FANCM, -L, -G, -A, -E, -C, -B, and -F form a FA core complex with FA-associated proteins such as FAAP20, FAAP24, FAAP100, MHF1, and MHF2 [3,13,14,16]. The FA core complex, as a ubiquitin E3 ligase, facilitates sensing DNA lesions and mono-ubiquitinates FANCD2 and FANCI. The mono-ubiquitinated FANCD2 and FANCI form a heterodimer ID complex by binding to each other, and the mono-ubiquitination of FANCD2 and FANCI is widely accepted as a biomarker for the presence of ICLs. Recruitment of ID complex to the sites of DNA lesions is critical for the FA pathway to repair ICLs including incision, unhooking, error prone translesion synthesis, and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair [17,18]. The ID complex is important for regulating the functions of downstream factors of the FA pathway including FANCD1, -N, -J, -S, and -O [19,20]. Mono-ubiquitinated FANCD2 is recruited to DNA lesions and promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination [21,22].
CHK1 was first known as a Ser/Thr protein kinase regulating G2/M phase transition to DNA damage in fission yeast [23]. Human and Xenopus CHK1 were phosphorylated in response to DNA damage [24,25]. CHK1 has a key role in delivering checkpoint signals received from the ATM and ATR, which phosphorylate CHK1 and CHK2 [26]. Unlike CHK2, which is expressed throughout the cell cycle, CHK1 is mainly involved in the S and G2 phase to arrest cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage [27]. It has been well recognized that cancer cells with p53 mutations rely heavily on CHK1 functions for survival [28], which is supported by the findings showing that CHK1 is overexpressed in several human tumors [29,30,31]. Therefore, CHK1 has been a potential target for cancer therapy and, as a result, CHK1 inhibitors have been developed. Particularly, it was reported that enhanced CHK1 activity is correlated with cancer resistance, and thus CHK1 inhibitors showed synergistic cancer therapy efficacy together with chemotherapeutics including gemcitabine and cisplatin [28].
Here, we examined the mono-ubiquitination and foci formation of FANCD2 in the absence of PML NBs to address the functional roles of PML NBs in the FA pathway. Depletion of PML in U2OS and HeLa cells resulted in loss of foci formation and mono-ubiquitination of FANCD2. Interestingly, we found that damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation is severely impaired in cells depleted with PML. In addition, we showed that CHK1 plays a critical role in Fanconi anemia gene expression, demonstrating that PML regulates FA gene expression by promoting damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation. These findings will be informative for better understanding the molecular basis for the synergistic chemotherapeutic effects of combined treatment with CHK1 inhibitors and crosslinking agents.
2. Results
2.1. Depletion of PML Causes Impairment of Damage-Induced FANCD2 Mono-Ubiquitination and FANCD2 Foci Formation
PML NBs are implicated in diverse DNA damage responses and DNA repair pathways. In this study, we aimed to understand the roles of PML NBs in the Fanconi anemia pathway, which is critical for repairing ICL damage. To this end, we depleted PML proteins and tested if FANCD2 was mono-ubiquitinated upon MMC treatment. As a control, ATR protein was depleted because it is required for damage-induced FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination [32].
Interestingly, we found that loss of PML protein severely impaired FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination in U2OS cells (Figure 1A). Consistently, damage-induced FANCD2 foci formation was abrogated in the U2OS cells depleted with PML proteins (Figure 1B). It was reported that the localization and functions of PML NBs in cells that activate alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are different from the processes in non-ALT cells [33,34]. Whereas U2OS cells elongate the telomeres by ALT, HeLa cells extend the telomeres through telomerase. Therefore, to test if PML NBs also affected FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and damage-induced foci formation in non-ALT cells, we depleted PML protein in HeLa cells, followed by MMC treatment. As shown in Figure 1C–D, HeLa cells treated with siRNA against the PML protein showed impaired FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and failed to form damage-induced FANCD2 foci, which suggests that PML NBs regulate FANCD2 functions in both ALT and non-ALT cells. Because FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination and foci formation are critical for resistance to the genotoxic agents that cause ICLs, we tested if PML depletion led to hypersensitivity to MMC. As shown in Figure 1E,F, U2OS or HeLa cells depleted with ATR, as a control, showed higher sensitivity to MMC. We found that depletion of PML NBs in both cells also led to greater MMC sensitivity compared to control cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that PML NBs plays an important role in repairing interstrand DNA crosslink damage through promoting the Fanconi anemia pathway.
2.2. Damage-Induced FANCA Foci Formation Is Impaired in Cells with PML Depletion
Recruitment of the Fanconi anemia core complex to the sites of DNA damage is crucial for FANCD2 mono-ubiquitination during ICL repair. To gain insight into the molecular basis for the observation that loss of PML proteins impairs the damage-induced foci formation and mono-ubiquitination of FANCD2, we first tested if the FA core complex moves to sites of DNA damage. As shown in Supplementary Figure S1, damage-induced FANCA foci are nicely co-localized with damage markers such as γH2AX and FANCD2 in U2OS cells treated with MMC, which induces ICL damage. In the same setting, we depleted PML protein and tested if damage-induced FANCA foci are formed. Interestingly, we found that damage-induced FANCA foci formation was severely impaired in the U2OS cells (Figure 2A). PML proteins are essential components of PML nuclear bodies. PML NBs are subnuclear organelles that regulate the stability, functions, and localization of various proteins. Therefore, we asked if the PML NBs directly regulate FANCA recruitment to the sites of DNA damage or play a role in FANCA gene expression. To this end, we took advantage of the Fanconi anemia patient cell line, GM6914 [35], which does not express endogenous FANCA protein and GM6914 cells complemented with either empty vector (GM6914/EV) or HA-tagged wildtype FANCA (GM6914/FANCA). As shown in the Figure 2B,C, we found that exogenous FANCA expression under a CMV promoter was not reduced and damage-induced FANCA foci formation was normal upon siRNA-mediated PML depletion in the GM6914/FANCA cells. These findings imply that protein stability of the FA core complex is not affected by the PML NBs, and that PML NBs regulate the expression of Fanconi anemia proteins at the transcriptional level.
2.3. PML Regulates FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 Gene Expression
The findings described above suggest that PML proteins might be implicated in Fanconi anemia gene expression. To test if PML proteins are important for expression of Fanconi anemia proteins, we depleted PML in U2OS cells and performed immunoblot analysis with and without MMC treatment. As shown in Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S2A, we found that FANCA and FANCG protein level were lower in the cells depleted PML protein. However, FANCL expression level was not reduced, suggesting that not all FA protein gene expression is regulated by PML. In addition, to see if the FA core complex is one of the targets for ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation, we treated the cells with MG132 after inducing DNA damage, but we found that there was no protein stability recovery upon MG132 treatment, indicating that PML might regulate expression of the FA core complex at the transcriptional level (Figure 3A). Indeed, we found significantly less FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 at the transcriptional level in the absence of PML proteins, measured by real-time quantitative PCR (Figure 3B). Taken together, these findings suggest that PML regulates the gene expression of FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2.
2.4. PML Promotes CHK1 Phosphorylation in Response to DNA Damage
The next question to be addressed is to understand the molecular basis of the transcriptional regulation of FA proteins upon PML depletion. It was reported that depletion of PML results in impairment of homologous recombination pathways and defects in damage-induced CHK1 S317 phosphorylation [12]. CHK1 is one of the important mediators of DNA damage responses and phosphorylates diverse downstream effectors implicated not only in the cell cycle, DNA repair, and replication, but also in gene expression [28]. Therefore, we tested if PML regulates damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation. To this end, we depleted PML in the ALT cell, U2OS, and non-ALT cells, HeLa, and performed immunoblot analysis for damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation. As shown in the Figure 4A, we found that ATR-mediated phosphorylation at Ser317 and Ser345, and autophosphorylation at Ser296 of CHK1, were significantly reduced in both U2OS and HeLa cells. These findings suggest that PML might promote FA gene expression and damage-induced foci formation via CHK1 phosphorylation. Indeed, the immunofluorescence experiment showed that damage-induced FANCD2 and FANCA foci formation is severely impaired in U2OS cells treated with CHK1 siRNA (Figure 4B).
2.5. CHK1 Is Implicated in FA Gene Expression
To this point, we showed that CHK1 phosphorylation is regulated by PML. To test if CHK1 regulates gene expression, we depleted CHK1 in U2OS cells and performed immunoblot analysis to measure the expression of FA proteins. As shown in the Figure 5A, siRNA-mediated CHK1 depletion results in significant reduction in FANCA and decreased protein expression of FANCD2 and FANCG (Figure 5A and Supplementary Figure S2B). However, as was the case with PML knockdown, FANCL protein expression was not affected by CHK1 depletion, which suggests that CHK1 does not regulate all FA protein expression. Again, we found that treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 failed to restore the expression level of those proteins, excluding the possibility of ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of those proteins (Figure 5A). In addition, the FANCA expressed under CMV promoter in GM6914 cells did not decrease in cells depleted with CHK1, demonstrating that CHK1 regulates gene expression of FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 through the endogenous promoter region (Figure 5B). As CHK1 depletion or treatment with a CHK1 inhibitor did not affect cell cycle progression (Supplementary Figure S3), reduced protein expression might not be due to aberrant cell cycle distribution. These findings suggest that CHK1 is implicated in transcription of FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2. Next, to directly measure the transcriptional activity of FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2, CHK1 was depleted in the U2OS cells and we performed RT-qPCR. As shown in the Figure 5C, we found that FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 transcripts were severely decreased in the cells depleted with CHK1, which is consistent with the decreased proteins expression. However, FANCL transcript level was not altered in the same setting, indicating that not all transcription of the Fanconi core complex was not affected by CHK1 phosphorylation.
2.6. Synergistic Chemotherapeutic Effects of CHK1 Inhibitors and Crossliking Agents
DNA crosslinking agents have been used as chemotherapeutics for decades because they cause deadly DNA damage. The FA pathway is implicated in repairing DNA damage induced by DNA crosslinkers. Our findings showed that CHK1 phosphorylation plays a role in expression of some of the Fanconi anemia core factors and FANCD2, which is critical for ICL repair. Therefore, it is possible that depletion of CHK1 might be able to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy when combined with DNA crosslinking agents. To test this possibility, we depleted CHK1 for four days, plated a fixed number of the cells with different concentrations of MMC, and performed a clonogenic assay. As shown in the Figure 6A, we found that CHK1 depletion further sensitized the HeLa cells to MMC, implying that combined treatment with DNA crosslinking agents and CHK1 inhibitors might exhibit synergistic effects on cancer cell death. Indeed, combined treatment of CHK1 inhibitor AZD7762 and MMC led to enhanced cell death (Figure 6B).
3. Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that PML regulates damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation, which is important for FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 gene expression at the transcriptional level. Fanconi anemia proteins are critical for repairing interstrand DNA crosslinks, which are generated by chemotherapeutic agents including mitomycin C, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and carboplatin. Our findings suggest that defects in CHK1 phosphorylation result in the decrement of gene expression of some of the Fanconi anemia genes, which leads to failure of repairing interstrand DNA crosslinks. Indeed, we found that depletion of CHK1 or inhibition of CHK1 phosphorylation further sensitized HeLa cells to MMC (Figure 6). Since CHK1 inhibitors are one of the most investigated drugs in clinical trials, our findings will be informative to understand the molecular basis of the synergistic chemotherapeutic effects of CHK1 inhibitors and crosslinking agents.
PML proteins are essential for the formation of the distinctive subnuclear structure named PML NB, which plays diverse roles in transcriptional regulation, DNA damage responses, DNA repair, and cell proliferation [6,34]. We found that damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation is diminished in cells depleted with PML expression in both ALT and non-ALT cells, although subcellular localization of PML NBs is different [34]. It was reported that ATR, the primary CHK1 kinase, is co-localized with ALT-associated PML NBs [36]. Therefore, it is possible that ALT-associated PML NBs are the center for CHK1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage in ALT cells. This hypothesis is supported by our results showing that depletion of PML leads to significantly reduced damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation at Ser317, Ser345, and Ser296 (Figure 4A). However, as ATR is not co-localized with TRF1 in non-ALT cells [36], PML-mediated CHK1 phosphorylation in non-ALT cells might be regulated differently, which remains elusive. Considering the facts that CHK1 plays a central role in DNA damage responses, further studies will be required for determining how PML regulates CHK1 phosphorylation in ALT and non-ALT cells.
Fanconi anemia is a rare recessive genetic disorder characterized by congenital abnormality, bone marrow failure, and cancer predisposition. Genome instability has been observed in the cells that lost one of the factors implicated in the Fanconi anemia pathway. Although FA is a rare genetic disease, factors involved in FA pathways have been extensively studied as they are associated with important DNA repair factors and pathways. Nevertheless, transcriptional regulation of FA gene expression has not been investigated intensively. Here, we found that FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 transcription is downregulated in the cells depleted with CHK1 (Figure 5). It was reported that some of the FA gene expression was regulated by the Rb/E2F pathway [37]. Further studies showed that the endogenous FANCD2 promoter interacts with the E2F transcriptional activator [37]. In addition, recent study showed that CHK1 phosphorylation or CHK1 depletion leads to downregulation of E2F1 [29]. Therefore, we propose that damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation promotes E2F1 gene expression, which activates transcription of some of the FA genes.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that PML regulates damage-induced CHK1 phosphorylation, which promotes FANCA, FANCG, and FANCD2 gene expression. Cancer cells with p53 mutations rely heavily on CHK1 functions for cancer cell survival, which makes CHK1 a target for cancer therapy. Indeed, the enhanced chemotherapeutic effects of CHK1 inhibitors have been reported. Therefore, CHK1 inhibitors are often used with platinum-based drugs or gemcitabine. Specifically, cancer stem cells exhibit more efficient DNA repair systems [38], which often leads to resistance to chemotherapy. Here, we showed for the first time that CHK1 is implicated in the expression of FA proteins, which is important for repairing interstrand DNA crosslinks. These findings suggest that treatment with CHK1 inhibitors might be able to reduce the DNA repair capacities of cancer cells, which increases the cancer therapeutic efficacy.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Cell Culture
U2OS, HeLa, and GM6914 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin (all Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). All cells were maintained in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C.
4.2. Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)
PML, ATR, CHK1, or control siRNA was transfected into cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as suggested by the manufacturer’s instructions. The siRNA sequences used in this experiment were as follows: siPML#1: 5‘-AACGACAGCCCAGAAGAGGAAUU-3′, siPML#2: 5′-CACCCGCAAGACCAACAACAUUU-3′, siATR#1: 5′-GGGAAAUACUAGAACCUCAUCUAAAUU-3′, siATR#2: 5′-GGUCUGGAGUAAAGAAGCCAAUUUAUU-3′, siATR#3: 5′-CCACCUGAGGGUAAGAACAUGUUAAUU-3′, siChk1#1: 5′-GAAGCAGUCGCAGUGAAGAUUGUAG-3′, siChk1#2: 5′-CAAGAUGUGUGGUACUUUACCAUAT-3′, siChk1#3: 5′-GAGAAGGCAAUAUCCAAUAUUUATT-3′; a pool of two siPMLs, three siATRs, or three siChk1s were used with a final siRNA concentration of 25 nM.
4.3. Western Blotting
After 24 h from siRNA transfection, cells treated with 1μM MMC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h were harvested by trypsinization and lysed by lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.5% NP-40) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were eluted in protein sample buffer (Elpis Biotech, Taejon, Korea), boiled for 5 min, and quickly centrifuged. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was conducted using 6% or 10% gels, and samples for FANCD2 immunoblotting were loaded on a 10-well Novex 3~8% Tris-acetate gel (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Proteins were transferred to a 0.45 μm pore immobilon-P transfer membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Blots were blocked with 10% DifcoTM Skim Milk (BD Biosciences, East Rutherford, NJ, USA) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with FANCD2 (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA: NB100-182), FANCA (Merck Millipore: MABC557), FANCG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA: sc-393382), FANCL (Santa Cruz Biotechnology: sc-137067), HA (Covance, Princeton, NJ, USA: MMS-101R), CHK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology: sc-8408), pCHK1 S317 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA: #12302), pCHK1 S345 (Cell Signaling Technology: #2348), pCHK1 S296 (Cell Signaling Technology: #2349), Actinin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology: sc-166524), and Tubulin (AbFrontier, Seoul, Korea: LF-PA0146) as primary antibodies. After blots were washed in 1X PBS-Tween20 buffer, the blots were incubated in anti-mouse secondary (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA: 115-035-003) or anti-rabbit secondary (Jackson ImmunoResearch: 111-035-003). Bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using ChemiDoc System (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
4.4. Immunofluorescence
Cells were cultured on 12 mm diameter microscope cover glasses, permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 3 min, and then fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature. Cells washed by PBS were extracted with 0.5% NP-40 (USBiological, Salem, MA, USA) for 5 min at room temperature. After they were washed, cells were blocked with blocking buffer (0.2% gelatin and 0.5% BSA in PBS) for 1~2 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies, such as FANCA (Merck Millipore: MABC557), FANCD2 (Novus Biologicals: NB100-182), PML (Santa Cruz Biotechnology: sc-966), or γH2AX (Cell Signaling Technology: #2595) overnight at 4 °C. Samples were washed three times for 10 min with blocking buffer. Secondary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) mouse 488 (Abcam: ab150109), rabbit 594 (Invitrogen: A21207), mouse 594 (Abcam: ab150112), and rabbit 488 (Abcam: ab150061) were diluted 1:2500 and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Finally, cells were washed three times for 30 min and mounted in Vectashield® containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA).
4.5. Mitomycin C Sensitivity Assay
Cells were plated in 96-well plates in triplicate at a density of 1000 cells per well. MMC was added to cells treated with siRNA at final concentration from 0~100 nM. After 4 or 5 days in culture, cell numbers were determined using Cellvia Enhanced Cell Viability Assay Kit (AbFrontier). The cell number after MMC treatment was normalized to the cell number in the untreated sample to arrive at the percent survival.
4.6. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total cell RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit and QIAshredder (QIAGEN) and synthesized into cDNA through the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen); mRNA level was determined by 2× qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCRBiosystems, Wayne, PA, USA), and relative value was calculated after normalization against GAPDH. Gene-specific primers are listed in Table S1.
4.7. Clonogenic Assay
Cells (5 × 105/dish) were plated in a 6 cm culture dish for 1 day and transfected with 25 nM siRNA using RNAiMAX. The next day, cultured cells were treated with indicated MMC concentrations for 1 day, and then harvested cells (1 × 103/well) were spread in new 6-well dishes. After 1 week, colonies were washed and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Washed cells were stained with crystal violet solution (0.1% crystal violet and 10% ethanol in distilled water) for 15 min. After removing all dye, each plate was tapped on paper towels and air dried overnight.
4.8. Statistics
Statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA). p values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For comparison between two normally distributed test groups, the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used. The following standard symbols are used to reference p values: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of the Laboratory of Genome Maintenance at Sookmyung Women’s University for critical discussions and revising the manuscript.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22157782/s1.
Author Contributions
Y.-H.K. (Yong-Hwan Kim) and L.-K.K. conceived and designed the studies. A.M., M.-J.K. and D.-Y.K. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data, together with Y.-H.K. (Young-Hoon Kee) and Y.-J.J., M.-J.K. and Y.-H.K. (Yong-Hwan Kim) wrote the manuscript with input from Y.-H.K. (Young-Hoon Kee). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning of the Korean government: NRF-2014M3C9A2064688, NRF-2019R1A2C2089746 and NRF-2021R1A6A1A03038890 to Y.-H.K. (Yong-Hwan Kim), and NRF-2020R1I1A1A01061661 to M.-J.K.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.De The H., Le Bras M., Lallemand-Breitenbach V. The cell biology of disease: Acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic, and PML bodies. J. Cell Biol. 2012;198:11–21. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201112044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernardi R., Pandolfi P.P. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:1006–1016. doi: 10.1038/nrm2277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guan D., Kao H.Y. The function, regulation and therapeutic implications of the tumor suppressor protein, PML. Cell Biosci. 2015;5:60. doi: 10.1186/s13578-015-0051-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Salomoni P., Pandolfi P.P. The role of PML in tumor suppression. Cell. 2002;108:165–170. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00626-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Di Masi A., Cilli D., Berardinelli F., Talarico A., Pallavicini I., Pennisi R., Leone S., Antoccia A., Noguera N.I., Lo-Coco F., et al. PML nuclear body disruption impairs DNA double-strand break sensing and repair in APL. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2308. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chang H.R., Munkhjargal A., Kim M.J., Park S.Y., Jung E., Ryu J.H., Yang Y., Lim J.S., Kim Y. The functional roles of PML nuclear bodies in genome maintenance. Mutat Res. 2018;809:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sahin U., de The H., Lallemand-Breitenbach V. PML nuclear bodies: Assembly and oxidative stress-sensitive sumoylation. Nucleus. 2014;5:499–507. doi: 10.4161/19491034.2014.970104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jensen K., Shiels C., Freemont P.S. PML protein isoforms and the RBCC/TRIM motif. Oncogene. 2001;20:7223–7233. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weidtkamp-Peters S., Lenser T., Negorev D., Gerstner N., Hofmann T.G., Schwanitz G., Hoischen C., Maul G., Dittrich P., Hemmerich P. Dynamics of component exchange at PML nuclear bodies. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:2731–2743. doi: 10.1242/jcs.031922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nisole S., Maroui M.A., Mascle X.H., Aubry M., Chelbi-Alix M.K. Differential Roles of PML Isoforms. Front. Oncol. 2013;3:125. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fogal V., Gostissa M., Sandy P., Zacchi P., Sternsdorf T., Jensen K., Pandolfi P.P., Will H., Schneider C., Del Sal G. Regulation of p53 activity in nuclear bodies by a specific PML isoform. EMBO J. 2000;19:6185–6195. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boichuk S., Hu L., Makielski K., Pandolfi P.P., Gjoerup O.V. Functional connection between Rad51 and PML in homology-directed repair. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Auerbach A.D. Fanconi anemia and its diagnosis. Mutat. Res. 2009;668:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bagby G.C., Jr. Genetic basis of Fanconi anemia. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2003;10:68–76. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200301000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Niedernhofer L.J., Lalai A.S., Hoeijmakers J.H. Fanconi anemia (cross) linked to DNA repair. Cell. 2005;123:1191–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Castella M., Pujol R., Callen E., Trujillo J.P., Casado J.A., Gille H., Lach F.P., Auerbach A.D., Schindler D., Benitez J., et al. Origin, functional role, and clinical impact of Fanconi anemia FANCA mutations. Blood. 2011;117:3759–3769. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-299917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ceccaldi R., Sarangi P., D’Andrea A.D. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: New players and new functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:337–349. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Michl J., Zimmer J., Tarsounas M. Interplay between Fanconi anemia and homologous recombination pathways in genome integrity. EMBO J. 2016;35:909–923. doi: 10.15252/embj.201693860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Castella M., Jacquemont C., Thompson E.L., Yeo J.E., Cheung R.S., Huang J.W., Sobeck A., Hendrickson E.A., Taniguchi T. FANCI Regulates Recruitment of the FA Core Complex at Sites of DNA Damage Independently of FANCD2. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smogorzewska A., Matsuoka S., Vinciguerra P., McDonald E.R., 3rd, Hurov K.E., Luo J., Ballif B.A., Gygi S.P., Hofmann K., D’Andrea A.D., et al. Identification of the FANCI protein, a monoubiquitinated FANCD2 paralog required for DNA repair. Cell. 2007;129:289–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim H., D’Andrea A.D. Regulation of DNA cross-link repair by the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1393–1408. doi: 10.1101/gad.195248.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Longerich S., Kwon Y., Tsai M.S., Hlaing A.S., Kupfer G.M., Sung P. Regulation of FANCD2 and FANCI monoubiquitination by their interaction and by DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:5657–5670. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walworth N., Davey S., Beach D. Fission yeast chk1 protein kinase links the rad checkpoint pathway to cdc2. Nature. 1993;363:368–371. doi: 10.1038/363368a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sanchez Y., Wong C., Thoma R.S., Richman R., Wu Z., Piwnica-Worms H., Elledge S.J. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: Linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science. 1997;277:1497–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kumagai A., Guo Z., Emami K.H., Wang S.X., Dunphy W.G. The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts. J. Cell Biol. 1998;142:1559–1569. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.6.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abraham R.T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2177–2196. doi: 10.1101/gad.914401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lukas C., Bartkova J., Latella L., Falck J., Mailand N., Schroeder T., Sehested M., Lukas J., Bartek J. DNA damage-activated kinase Chk2 is independent of proliferation or differentiation yet correlates with tissue biology. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4990–4993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Y., Hunter T. Roles of Chk1 in cell biology and cancer therapy. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;134:1013–1023. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hsu W.H., Zhao X., Zhu J., Kim I.K., Rao G., McCutcheon J., Hsu S.T., Teicher B., Kallakury B., Dowlati A., et al. Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibition Enhances Cisplatin Cytotoxicity and Overcomes Cisplatin Resistance in SCLC by Promoting Mitotic Cell Death. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019;14:1032–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Verlinden L., Vanden Bempt I., Eelen G., Drijkoningen M., Verlinden I., Marchal K., De Wolf-Peeters C., Christiaens M.R., Michiels L., Bouillon R., et al. The E2F-regulated gene Chk1 is highly expressed in triple-negative estrogen receptor /progesterone receptor /HER-2 breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6574–6581. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hong J., Hu K., Yuan Y., Sang Y., Bu Q., Chen G., Yang L., Li B., Huang P., Chen D., et al. CHK1 targets spleen tyrosine kinase (L) for proteolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2012;122:2165–2175. doi: 10.1172/JCI61380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Andreassen P.R., D’Andrea A.D., Taniguchi T. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1958–1963. doi: 10.1101/gad.1196104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grobelny J.V., Godwin A.K., Broccoli D. ALT-associated PML bodies are present in viable cells and are enriched in cells in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. Pt 24J. Cell Sci. 2000;113:4577–4585. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.24.4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Y., Ma X., Wu W., Chen Z., Meng G. PML Nuclear Body Biogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Targeted Therapy. Trends Cancer. 2020;6:889–906. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kee Y., Kim J.M., D’Andrea A.D. Regulated degradation of FANCM in the Fanconi anemia pathway during mitosis. Genes Dev. 2009;23:555–560. doi: 10.1101/gad.1761309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fan Q., Zhang F., Barrett B., Ren K., Andreassen P.R. A role for monoubiquitinated FANCD2 at telomeres in ALT cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1740–1754. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hoskins E.E., Gunawardena R.W., Habash K.B., Wise-Draper T.M., Jansen M., Knudsen E.S., Wells S.I. Coordinate regulation of Fanconi anemia gene expression occurs through the Rb/E2F pathway. Oncogene. 2008;27:4798–4808. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bao S., Wu Q., McLendon R.E., Hao Y., Shi Q., Hjelmeland A.B., Dewhirst M.W., Bigner D.D., Rich J.N. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444:756–760. doi: 10.1038/nature05236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.