Abstract
From 2012 to 2017, serial ultrasonographic evaluation of 5 healthy bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, were performed over the course of 6 pregnancies in Enoshima Aquarium. A total of 98 ultrasonographic examinations were included in the study. In three out of six cases, two embryos were observed between umbilicus and genital slit, and side of umbilicus in the dam’s body. All embryos were located in right below the peritoneum and observed from 308 to 325 days pre-partum. These days were corresponding to from 58 to 61 days after copulation respectively. The diameter of the embryo sac was approximately 4 cm. In three cases, the fetal head was located in the dam’s left lateral between umbilicus and genital slit from approximately 90 days pre-partum to the parturition. A snout of fetus is at the top of the uterine horn, and the tail lies close to the cervix. All six calves were fluke-first births (breech presentation). It was conjectured that the contraction of the dam’s uterus during parturition forced the fetus to invert, and the fetal tail fluke was expelled from the dam’s body. In three cases, judging from orientation of fetal tail fluke faced towards left side of the dam, a fetal position might be RSL (Right Sacrum-Lateral) within the birth canal. In the other three cases, the left and right positions of the fetus and the dam’s body are reversed during pregnancy and parturition.
Keywords: embryo, fetal position, parturition, pregnancy, ultrasound
The use of ultrasonography for monitoring bottlenose dolphin pregnancy started probably around the late 1980s [4, 19]. In Japan, ultrasonography has been used to diagnose early pregnancy of cetaceans from the 1990s. In Enoshima Aquarium, the first record of ultrasonographic examinations on a pregnant cetacean was for a finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis, at a drained pool in 1992.
Ultrasonography is a valuable non-invasive diagnostic tool on small cetaceans in general, especially pregnancy in bottlenose dolphins is best diagnosed with ultrasonography [7]. Ultrasonography has been used for early pregnancy diagnosis in dolphins, and in most cases measures ovary [3, 12], the size of follicles before ovulation [13], size of embryo [16] and fetus, fetal heart beat and movement [16, 21], as well as the diameter of the fetal head and thorax [9, 10, 21].
In cetaceans, few of the fetomaternal anatomical structures during pregnancy by ultrasonography has been reported [9]. Furthermore, there are few manuscripts which describes how a fetal position will be within the birth canal at parturition [16]. Additionally, there are few papers that comparing the breech position (fluke-first) and cephalic position (head-first) at the parturition [6], however, none described the orientation of fetal tail flukes at the breech position.
The present study aims not only to investigate where embryo and fetus located in dam’s body during pregnancy by ultrasonography and photograph taken simultaneously a probe position, but also to estimate how fetal position would be within the birth canal from the orientation of fetal tail fluke which will be emerged towards dam’s body at a parturition.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal
Dams age ranged from 11 to estimated 30 years old at parturition. They were considered to be in good health based on routine rectal body temperature, blood data, ultrasonography and absence of clinical signs throughout pregnancy. Every dam had single neonate. Two male and 4 female neonates were born (Table 1). Case 2 was stillborn, however, all six neonates were fluke-first births (breech presentation).
Table 1. Embryo and fetal position during pregnancy and parturition.
Case | Stud book number |
Date of birth | Pregnancy |
Parturition |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Embryo position where located in dam’s body (CEa)/EPb)) |
Fetal head position in dam’s body within 90 days pre-partum |
Ventral surface of fetal tail flukes face towards dam’s body |
|||||
Dam | Neonate | ||||||
1 | 525 | 1,263 | Ff) | 2012/6/1 | Between umbilicus and GSc) (61/325) | Left lateral abdomen | Left |
2e) | 812 | 1,309 | F | 2013/7/24 | NDd) | Left lateral abdomen | Left |
3 | 602 | 1,310 | F | 2013/7/30 | ND | Left lateral abdomen | Left |
4 | 254 | 1,343 | F | 2014/9/29 | ND | Right lateral abdomen | Right |
5 | 600 | 1,358 | Mg) | 2015/4/12 | Between umbilicus and GS (58/318) | Right lateral abdomen | Right |
6 | 600 | 1,397 | M | 2017/5/7 | Side of umbilicus (58/308) | Right lateral abdomen | Right |
a) Number of days between copulation and embryo observed, b) embryo observed and parturition, c) genital slit, d) no data, e) stillborn, however the fetus was alive 2 days pre-partum, f) female, g) male.
Equipment
Ultrasonographic examinations were performed with a SonoSite MicroMAXX (Sonosite, Bothell, WA, USA) and C60e/5–2 MHz transducer. A frequency of 3.5 MHz was used.
Ultrasonographic examinations
From 2011 to 2017, ultrasonographic examinations by husbandry behaviour has been performed weekly to every two weeks for six pregnancies in five bottlenose dolphins (Table 1). Subject dolphins were trained to present and maintain ventral as well as lateral abdomen at the surface of water. During ultrasonographic examinations, dolphin was held by two trainers and performed of ultrasonographic examinations by one veterinarian. In one ultrasonographic examinations of Case 1, dolphin was landed on stage and scanned (Fig. 1). Additionally, a photograph was taken simultaneously at the time of ultrasonographic examinations in order to investigate where location of fetus in the dam’s body. During pregnancy, ovaries and corpus luteum were not examined in all cases.
Fig. 1.
Ultrasound images of an embryo and probe position for a longitudinal scan in Case 1 (A, B), 5 (C, D) and 6 (E, F). Embryo was observed between umbilicus and genital slit in Case 1 and 5, side of umbilicus in Case 6. All probe mark (Green Circle) on ultrasound images faced towards the dam’s tail fluke.
RESULTS
A total of 98 ultrasonographic examinations were included in the study (Figs. 2, 3). As the results of the present study, it was able to determine the approximate position of embryo between 308 and 325 days pre-partum, and the position of the fetal head from approximate 90 days pre-partum to parturition in a dam’s body. In the other periods, the fetal position in uterus fluctuated so much that the regularity of its position could not be determined.
Fig. 2.
Probe position at ultrasonographic examination when observed the fetal head. Numbers represents days to parturition in Case 1 (A), 2 (B) and 3 (C). Embryo was observed at 325 days pre-partum (61 days from copulation) in Case 1.
Fig. 3.
Probe position at ultrasonographic examination when observed the fetal head. Numbers represents days to parturition in Case 4 (A), 5 (B) and 6 (C). Embryos were observed at 318 days pre-partum (58 days from copulation) in Case 5, and at 308 days pre-partum (58 days from copulation) in Case 6.
Embryo position
In three out of six cases, two embryos were observed at between umbilicus and genital slit in Case 1 (Figs. 1B, 2A) and 5 (Figs. 1D, 3B), and one was observed side of umbilicus in Case 6 (Figs. 1F, 3C) where all of them were almost on the center line of dam’s abdomen. All three embryos were located at right below the peritoneum (Fig. 1A, 1C, 1E) and observed from 308 to 325 days pre-partum (Table 1). These days were corresponding to from 58 to 61 days after copulation. The diameter of the embryo sac was approximately 4 cm. The embryos were assessed in B-mode (Fig. 1).
Fetal position
In three cases, from 96 days pre-partum to 4 days pre-partum, the fetal head was located at the dam’s left lateral abdomen from umbilicus to genital slit (Fig. 2), and this position did not change. A snout of fetus was located at the top of the uterine horn, and the tail lied close to the cervix. In the other three cases, from 86 days pre-partum to 5 days pre-partum, the fetal head was located in the dam’s right lateral abdomen from umbilicus to genital slit (Fig. 3). The distance between the dam’s body of surface scanned by a probe and fetal head skin was within 5 cm after approximate 90 days pre-partum. Case 2 was a stillborn and the range of the fetal movement was narrowest during pregnancy compared to the other five cases (Figs. 2, 3).
Orientation of fetal tail flukes at parturition
In three cases (Table 1) which the fetal heads were located in the dam’s left lateral abdomen within 90 days pre-partum (Fig. 2), and ventral surface of fetal tail flukes emerged towards left of dam’s body at parturition (Fig. 4A). In the other three cases (Table 1) which the fetal heads were located in the dam’s right lateral abdomen within 90 days pre-partum (Fig. 3), and ventral surface of fetal tail flukes emerged towards right of dam’s body at parturition (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
At the parturition, ventral surface of fetal tail fluke faced towards left side of the dam’s body in Case 3 (A), or right side in Case 6 (B).
As the results of the present study, illustration of fetal position after approximate 90 days pre-partum is shown in Fig. 5A. Case 1, 2 and 3 corresponds to this illustration. In Case 4, 5 and 6, the left and right positions of the dam’s body and fetus are reversed.
Fig. 5.
Illustrations of the fetomaternal anatomical structures. A: A fetal position from ultrasonography imagine of 90 days pre-partum to the parturition in Case 1, 2 and 3. B: A fetal movement at the parturition. C: A fetal position might be RSL (Right Sacrum Lateral) within the birth canal. We used the terms referred to human classification [1, 8]. Dolphins do not have a sacrum, therefore, lumbar spine was used as a landmark.
DISCUSSION
The implantation of the fertilized egg and the development of the placenta take place in the endometrium of the uterine horns [14]. In the case of non-pregnant dolphin, uterine horns are located between umbilicus and genital slit, and lies close to the peritoneum [5, 15]. In the present study, embryos were at similar positions to these uterine horns, between umbilicus and genital slit, and side of umbilicus where were almost on the center line of dam’s abdomen and were located in right below the peritoneum. The uterus itself contains of a short corpus dividing into the two uterine horns, which run parallel for a short part of their length, and then bend respectively to the right and the left, curving first upwards and then downwards, to continue as the oviducts [17]. Therefore, it was not determined whether the uterine horn was on the left or the right side judging from the embryo position.
Earlier detection of uterine fluid and fetal membranes with ultrasonography is possible on bottlenose dolphin as early as day 30 after conception but usually requires 50 to 60 days for confirmation [7]. At 52 ± 3 days post-ovulation, the embryo was perfectly recognizable [16]. Also a fetus can be identified by the fourth week of gestation [20]. Timing of pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography is 50 to 60 days after post-breeding or AI [13]. In the present study, pregnancy could not be diagnosed by around 30 days after copulation. However, three embryos were observed from 308 to 325 days pre-partum. These days were corresponding to from 58 to 61 days after copulation. The present results were similar to these data [7, 13, 16].
In all cetacea the broad ligament of the uterus is attached to the lateral side of the corpus uteri and to the inner curvature of the uterine horns and tubae; it continues into the mesovarium. The tips of the horns of the nonpregnant uterus curves in the caudal direction. Both the tip and the base of the uterine horn are fixed to the abdominal wall at a point not far cranial of the pelvic bone [18]. Therefore, range of movement of the uterus will be limited by these ligamenta. In the present study, it was judged that the left horn of the uterus would be observed on the left lateral abdomen of the dam. In most of dolphin pregnancies, the fetus is located in the left horn and the right one contains only the tail and part of the allantois [5]. As the results of the present study, three out of six fetuses would be located in the left uterine horn and remaining three fetuses in the right uterine horn.
It is known that a cetacean fetus can change its position in the uterus during pregnancy, but usually moves into a tail-first position by the last months [2, 11]. From investigations of pregnant cetaceans it has, however, appeared that in some the final position is taken up very shortly before birth, and that some fetuses face the cervix during most of the periods of pregnancy. Possibly, the situation changes quite a few times during pregnancy [17]. As the results of the present study, we confirmed fetus would reposition easily in the uterus until 90 days pre-partum, however, fetal position would not change from 90 days pre-partum to parturition (Fig. 5A).
In the present study, snout of fetus is always at the top of uterine horn, while tail lies close to the cervix after 90 days pre-partum. Its position was similar to the illustrations of fetomaternal anatomical structure in third trimester [9] and the detailed drawing by Wislocki and Enders [22], however, the present fetal position (Fig. 5A) is similar to the detailed drawing [22], which is closer to dam’s body wall than the illustrations [9].
In humans, the terms used for breech positions are the same as for cephalic positions, except the sacrum of the fetus is used as the identifying landmark, instead of the occiput [8]. In the present study, since dolphins do not have a sacrum [15], lumbar spine is used as a landmark, and we referred to a human classification [1, 8]. In Case 1, 2 and 3 of the present study, it was suspected that the contraction of the dam’s uterus during parturition forced the fetus to invert (Fig. 5B), the fetus position might be RSL (Right Sacrum Lateral) within the birth canal (Fig. 5C) and fetal tail flukes might be expelled from the dam’s body (Fig. 4A).
Cardiac flicker signified heart movement in an embryo too small to measure rate [9]. In the present study, dam was floating on the water during ultrasonographic examinations and therefore M-mode was not able to calculate the heart-beat of an embryo due to the baseline of ultrasound images could not stabilized.
In conclusion, the fetal position was on either the left or the right side of dam’s body after 90 days pre-partum, and it was in the same orientation as ventral surface of fetal tail flukes towards dam’s body at parturition. From these points, in bottlenose dolphin, it was suggested that there might be regularity in the series of the fetal movements and uterine contraction during normal parturition.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
To the best of our knowledge, the named authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the staff of Enoshima Aquarium, and to Mr. K. Hori, Mr. H. Enomoto and Mr. T. Oyama. This work was supported by the Collaborative Research Program of Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ahmad A., Webb S. S., Early B., Sitch A., Khan K., Macarthur C.2014. Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 43: 176–182. doi: 10.1002/uog.13189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berta A., Sumich J. L., Kovacs K. M.2005. Cetacean evolution and systematics. pp. 165–209. In: Marine Mammal Evolutionary Biology, 2 ed., Academic Press, San Diego. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brook F. M.2001. Ultrasonographic imaging of the reproductive organs of the female bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus aduncas. Reproduction 121: 419–428. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cornell L. H., Asper E. D., Antrim J. E., Searles S. S., Young W. G., Goff T.1987. Progress report: results of a long-range captive breeding program for the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus and Tursiops truncatus gilli. Zoo Biol. 6: 41–53. doi: 10.1002/zoo.1430060106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cozzi B., Huggenberger S., Oelschlaeger H. A.2017. Urinary System, Genital Systems and Reproduction. pp. 369–409. In: Anatomy of Dolphins: Insights into Body Structure and Function, Academic Press, London. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Deng X., Hao Y., Serres A., Wang K., Wang D.2019. Position at birth and possible effects on calf survival in finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaorientaris). Aquat. Mamm. 45: 411–418. doi: 10.1578/AM.45.4.2019.411 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dold C.2014. Cetacea (Whales, Dolphins, Porpoises). pp. 422–436. In: Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, Vol. 8 (Miller, R. E. and Fowler, M. E. eds.), Elsevier Saunders, St. Louis. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hughey H. M.2005. Breech Positions, OB-GYN 101: Introductory Obstetrics & Gynecology, https://oacapps.med.jhmi.edu/OBGYN-101/Text/Abnormal%20L&D/fetal_position.htm#Breech%20Positions [accessed on February 23, 2021].
- 9.Ivančić M., Gomez F. M., Musser W. B., Barratclough A., Meegan J. M., Waitt S. M., Cárdenas Llerenas A., Jensen E. D., Smith C. R.2020. Ultrasonographic findings associated with normal pregnancy and fetal well-being in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 61: 215–226. doi: 10.1111/vru.12835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lacave G., Eggermont M., Verslycke T., Brook F., Salbany A., Roque L., Kinoshita R.2004. Prediction from ultrasonographic measurements of the expected delivery date in two species of bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus and Tursiops aduncus). Vet. Rec. 154: 228–233. doi: 10.1136/vr.154.8.228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reidenberg J. S., Laitman J. T.2009. Prenatal development in cetaceans. pp. 220–230. In: Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, 2 ed. (Perrin, W. F., Wursig, B. and Thewissen, J. G. M. eds), Academic Press, San Diego. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robeck T. R., Montano G. A., Steinman K. J., Smolensky P., Sweeney J., Osborn S., O’Brien J. K.2013. Development and evaluation of deep intra-uterine artificial insemination using cryopreserved sexed spermatozoa in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 139: 168–181. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Robeck T. R., O’Brien J. K., Atkinson S.2018. Reproduction. pp. 169–207. In: CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine, 3rd ed. (Gulland, F. M. D., Dierauf, L. A. and Whitman K. L. eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rommel S. A., Pabst D. A., McLellan W. A.2007. Functional anatomy of the cetacean reproductive system, with comparisons to the domestic pig. pp. 127–146. In: Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Cetacea. Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises (Miller, D. L. ed.), Science Publishers, Enfield. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rommel S. A., Costidis A. M., Lowenstine L. J.2018. Gross and microscopic anatomy. pp. 89–136. In: CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine, 3rd ed. (Gulland, F. M. D., Dierauf, L. A. and Whitman, K. L. eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saviano P., Fiorucci L., Grande F., Macrelli R., Troisi A., Polisca A., Orlandi R.2020. Pregnancy and fetal development: cephalic presentation and other descriptive ultrasonographic findings from clinically healthy bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) under human care. Animals (Basel) 10: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Slijper E. J.1962. Reproduction. pp. 349–390. In: Whales, Hutchinson, London. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Slijper E. J.1966. Functional morphology of the reproductive system in cetacea. pp. 277–319. In: Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises (Norris, K. S. ed.), University of California Press, Berleley and Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stones L. R., Phillips B., Sweeney J. C.1985. Diagnostic ultrasonography of the bottlenose dolphin. Abstracts and papers. p. 94. (Siberman, M. S. and Siberman, S. eds.), American Association of Zoo Veterinarian Annual Meeting, Scottsdale.
- 20.Stones L. R., Johnson R. L., Sweeney J. C., Lewis M. L.1999. Fetal ultrasonography in dolphins with emphasis on gestational aging. pp. 501–506. In: Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, Current Therapy 4 (Fowler, M. E. and Miller, R. E. eds.), W.B. Sanders, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Williamson P., Gales N. J., Lister S.1990. Use of real-time B-mode ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis and measurement of fetal growth rate in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 88: 543–548. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0880543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wislocki G. B., Enders R. K.1941. The placentation of the bottle-nosed porpoise (Tursiops truncatus). Am. J. Anat. 68: 97–114. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000680105 [DOI] [Google Scholar]