Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for respiratory failure or respiratory ECMO. It is usually indicated for patients with reversible, acute respiratory failure who fail to improve with conventional ventilatory support or for those on prolonged mechanical ventilation.1,2
One of the most critical ECMO complications is ECMO central-line–associated bloodstream infection (ECMO-CLABSI), which has an incidence density of 3.1–8.0 per 1,000 ECMO days according to previous studies.3,4 Because ECMO use has increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we investigated the incidence and changes in the trend of ECMO-CLABSI during the current pandemic.
Methods
This retrospective study was conducted from December 2013 to the end of February 2021 in 28-bed intensive care units at Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, a 790-bed, public, tertiary-care center in Tokyo, Japan. The study center began respiratory ECMO placement in December 2013. The center has been registered with the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) since 2015,5 and 10–20 respiratory ECMO placements are performed there annually.
Patients who received respiratory ECMO during the study period were enrolled for analysis. Their demographic data, indication for ECMO placement, ECMO device days (called ECMO days), duration of ICU hospitalization, in-hospital mortality at the index hospitalization, the number of ECMO-CLABSI events, and causative pathogens were extracted from the electronic medical records. ECMO-CLABSI patients were required to have a laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection that was not secondary to an infection at another body site. The definitions of CLABSI, ECMO days, and the ECMO device utilization ratio (DUR) from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) were used for ECMO-CLABSI.6 The incidence density of ECMO-CLABSI and the ECMO-DUR were calculated. The Institutional Review Board of the Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center approved this study.
Results
In total, 97 patients received respiratory ECMO placement, and the cumulative ECMO-days were 1,138. The in-hospital mortality rate was 38.1% (37 of 97), the median respiratory ECMO-days per patient was 8.0 days (range, 1–55), and the overall ECMO-DUR was 0.023. All the patients with ECMO were concurrently fitted with a central venous catheter and arterial catheter during ECMO use.
In total, ECMO-CLABSI developed in 12 patients, and the cumulative incidence density of ECMO-CLABSI during the entire study period was 10.54 per 1,000 ECMO days. Figure 1 shows the trends in the ECMO-CLABSI incidence and the ECMO-DUR. After February 2020, when the study center began admitting patients with COVID-19, both the ECMO-DUR and ECMO-CLABSI incidence density increased noticeably in comparison with the preceding period The ECMO-DUR was 0.018–0.061, with a rate ratio of 3.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.89–3.72). The ECMO-CLABSI incidence density was 10.11–11.53 per 1.000 ECMO days, with an incidence ratio of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.16–3.42). The most common causative pathogens in ECMO-CLABSI were Candida spp (3 of 12) followed by Staphylococcus spp (2 of 12). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with ECMO-CLABSI than in those without ECMO-CLBSI: 75.0% (9 of 12) versus 32.9% (28 of 85).
Fig. 1.
Trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) central-line–associated bloodstream infection and the ECMO device utilization ratio.
When the outcomes of the patients with COVID-19 on ECMO were compared with those without COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 1 online), the former tended to be more obese (body mass index >25 km/m2). Although the difference was statistically nonsignificant, more ECMO-CLABSI cases were observed among patients with COVID-19. The incidence density was 16.19 per 1,000 ECMO days among patients with COVID-19 versus 8.98 per 1,000 ECMO days among those without COVID-19, for an incidence ratio of 1.80 (95% CI, 0.26–5.41).
Discussion
In this study, we examined trends in respiratory ECMO use over 7 years at a tertiary-care center in Japan. The overall incidence density of ECMO-CLABSI was 10.54 per 1,000 ECMO days, which is in line with other observational studies.3,4 Respiratory ECMO use has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic began, and increasing incidence density of ECMO-CLABSI has also been observed.
The clear increase in the incidence density of ECMO-CLABSI following the COVID-19 outbreak in the present study reflects the findings of a previous study in which an increase in the incidence of healthcare-associated infections, including CLABSI, occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic.7,8 Supplementary Table 1 (online) shows that the proportion of patients with BMI >25 kg/m2 was higher among those with COVID-19 while on ECMO. Although central venous catheterization in the femoral vein should be avoided in obese patients,9 respiratory ECMO catheterization is frequently performed using the femoral vein. Dressing failure, local contamination, and local bacterial overgrowth create suboptimal conditions for the catheterization site. Moreover, prolonged catheterization, which can also contribute to ECMO-CLABSI development, has been observed in patients with COVID-19. Given the increased use of ECMO during the COVID-19 pandemic, an evidence-based approach is urgently needed to prevent ECMO-CLABSI.
This study has several limitations. Because it was conducted at a single tertiary-care center, its findings may not apply to other institutions. Because all patients with ECMO were fitted with a central venous catheter and an arterial catheter, distinguishing ECMO-CLABSI from other catheter-related BSI was challenging. Moreover, ECMO-CLABSI may not have caused the death of the patients with ECMO. Because relatively few patients were enrolled, further studies enrolling a larger cohort are needed to verify these findings. Although there is a consensus on indications for ECMO placement, some variation in the ECMO procedure in the present study may have affected the results.
In the present study, we determined the incidence of ECMO-CLABSI at a tertiary-care center in Japan. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, demand for ECMO use has been increasing, and patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO placement may be at risk of developing ECMO-CLABSI. Further studies enrolling a larger patient population with ECMO placement in the context of COVID-19 care are needed to clarify the ECMO-CLABSI risk in patients with COVID-19.
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff of the Department of Critical Care at Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center for managing the patients. We are also grateful to Mr. James R. Valera for his assistance with editing this manuscript.
Financial support
No financial support was provided relevant to this article.
Conflicts of interest
All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Supplementary material
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.331.
click here to view supplementary material
References
- 1.General guidelines for all ECLS cases. Extracorporeal Life Support Corporation (ELSO) webisite. https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/ELSO%20Guidelines%20General%20All%20ECLS%20Version%201_4.pdf. Published August 2017, Accessed April 14, 2021.
- 2.Na SJ, Chung CR, Choi HJ, et al. Bloodstream infection in patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:871–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seidelman JL, Lewis SS, Huslage K, et al. To be a CLABSI or not to be a CLABSI—that is the question: the epidemiology of BSI in a large ECMO population. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:362–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Menaker J, Galvagno S, Rabinowitz R, et al. Epidemiology of blood stream infection in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a cohort study. Heart Lung 2019;48:236–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Center registry. Extracorporeal Life Support Corporation (ELSO) website. https://www.elso.org/Membership/CenterDirectory.aspx. Accessed April 14, 2021.
- 6.National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Bloodstream infection event (central-line–associated bloodstream infection and non–central-line–associated bloodstream infection). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/4psc_clabscurrent.pdf. Accessed April 14, 2021.
- 7.Fakih MG, Bufalino A, Sturm L, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): the urgent need to refocus on hardwiring prevention efforts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Patel PR, Weiner-Lastinger LM, Dudeck MA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on central-line–associated bloodstream infections during the early months of 2020, National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marschall J, Mermel LA, Classen D, et al. Strategies to prevent central-line–associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29 suppl 1:S22–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.331.
click here to view supplementary material

