Abstract
Objectives: Arterial hypertension, when exacerbated by excessive dietary salt intake, worsens the morbidity and mortality rates associated with cardiovascular and renal diseases. Stimulation of the apelinergic system appears to protect against several circulatory system diseases, but it remains unknown if such beneficial effects are conserved in severe hypertension. Therefore, we aimed at determining whether continuous infusion of apelinergic ligands (i.e., Apelin-13 and Elabela) exerted cardiorenal protective effects in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats receiving high-salt diet.
Methods: A combination of echocardiography, binding assay, histology, and biochemical approaches were used to investigate the cardiovascular and renal effects of Apelin-13 or Elabela infusion over 6 weeks in SHR fed with normal-salt or high-salt chow.
Results: High-salt intake upregulated the cardiac and renal expression of APJ receptor in SHR. Importantly, Elabela was more effective than Apelin-13 in reducing high blood pressure, cardiovascular and renal dysfunctions, fibrosis and hypertrophy in high-salt fed SHR. Unlike Apelin-13, the beneficial effects of Elabela were associated with a counter-regulatory role of the ACE/ACE2/neprilysin axis of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in heart and kidneys of salt-loaded SHR. Interestingly, Elabela also displayed higher affinity for APJ in the presence of high salt concentration and better resistance to RAAS enzymes known to cleave Apelin-13.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the protective action of the apelinergic system against salt-induced severe hypertension and cardiorenal failure. As compared with Apelin-13, Elabela displays superior pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that warrant further investigation of its therapeutic use in cardiovascular and kidney diseases.
Keywords: Elabela/Toddler, Apelin, APJ receptor, ACE2, neprilysin, hypertension, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, sodium diet
Introduction
The apelinergic system is involved in numerous physiological functions, such as fluid homeostasis, energy metabolism as well as regulation of cardiovascular development and function (Pitkin et al., 2010; Kidoya et al., 2015; Hwangbo et al., 2017; Kuba et al., 2019). It is composed of the endogenous ligands Apelin (which include several active fragments Apelin-13, Apelin-17, Apelin-36) and Elabela as well as of the APJ receptor, a class AG protein-coupled receptor first discovered in 1993 based on its homology with the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) (O’Dowd et al., 1993; Ma et al., 2017). Over the last decade, the APJ receptor has received ongoing interest as an attractive therapeutic target for the treatment of heart failure and cardiovascular diseases, notably due to its inodilator properties following activation, causing marked arterial vasodilation and positive inotropic effect (Tatemoto et al., 1998; Szokodi et al., 2002; Coquerel et al., 2018). Importantly, administration of [Pyr1]-Apelin-13 (Ape13), the predominant Apelin fragment detected in human plasma and heart (Maguire et al., 2009; Zhen et al., 2013), was found to exert beneficial effects in heart failure patients (Japp et al., 2010). Discovered more recently, Elabela-32 has been shown to mediate self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells (Ho et al., 2015), to regulate endoderm differentiation, and to contribute to cardiovascular development during zebrafish and mouse embryogenesis (Chng et al., 2013; Ho et al., 2017). Moreover, Elabela-32 increases the contractility of ex-vivo isolated rat heart at adulthood (Perjes et al., 2016; Coquerel et al., 2017). Since then, sustained activation of the Ape13-Elabela-APJ receptor axis has demonstrated significant cardio-protective effects in various rodent models of cardiac dysfunctions (Chagnon et al., 2017; Coquerel et al., 2017; Ho et al., 2017; Sato et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Coquerel et al., 2018).
Hypertension is a multifactorial disease resulting from genetic and environmental factors that affect the cardiovascular and renal functions. It is responsible for a striking 40% of the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular diseases (Basting and Lazartigues, 2017). In human, hypertension is manifested by a systemic elevated arterial blood pressure leading to heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases and kidney damage (Sekerci et al., 2018). Indeed, several clinical studies indicate a correlation between the progression of renal failure with the increased of blood pressure (Wright et al., 2002; Chobanian et al., 2003). Moreover, excessive dietary salt intake on a chronic basis may result in an increase in proteinuria and elevation of pressure overload in salt-sensitive individuals, leading to cardiac dysfunction and progressive renal injury (Du Cailar et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2006). The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) model closely mimics human hypertension which progresses toward heart failure with pathophysiological changes associated with cardiac and renal dysfunction (Ferrone et al., 1979; Doggrell and Brown, 1998). As observed in humans, cardiac and renal damage is aggravated in these animals when a high-salt intake regimen is administered (Doggrell and Brown, 1998). It has been postulated that the pathophysiological, structural, and functional changes induced by chronic salt loading could be mediated through the action of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the vasculature, heart, and kidneys (Frohlich, 2008). In this study, we thus investigated whether the apelinergic system could provide beneficial effects to SHR rats fed with normal-salt or high-salt diet. We demonstrated here that Elabela-32 exerts potent and greater cardiorenal protective effects than Ape13 in rodents with severe salt-induced hypertension.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Experimental Protocols
Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Kingston, ON, Canada) and maintained in a temperature-controlled room with a 12 h light/dark cycle at the animal facility of the Université de Sherbrooke. All animals were randomized with unique identification number into the different groups tested to maintain experimenter blinding. The study included six distinct SHR experimental groups (Table 1). Three groups received a standard rat chow diet containing 0.3% of NaCl (Charles River, ON, Canada) while the other three groups were fed a rat diet containing 8% of NaCl for 6 weeks (Research Diets, NJ, United States). Once a week, urine output and water intake were measured over 24 h using metabolic cages following 3 days of acclimatization. After 6 weeks of different salt intake regimens, the rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane for echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements. Subsequently, blood samples were collected into tubes containing K2-EDTA and centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min at 4°C before storing the plasma at −80°C. Plasma and urinary concentrations of sodium were determined by a vitros 750 XRC analyser (Johnson-Johnson Clinical Diagnostics; Rochester, NY). OCT-embedded sections of heart (7 µm) were generated and collagen fibers visualized by Masson’s trichrome staining. Immunohistochemistry stained slides were captured by an automated Hamamatsu Nanozoomer 2.0RS slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics). Heart and kidneys were also harvested, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for mRNA expression analysis. All animal procedures were approved by our institutional ethical committee (protocol #2017–2115), in compliance with the policies and directives of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and with the ARRIVE guidelines.
TABLE 1.
SHR rats | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Normal-salt diet | High-salt diet | |||||
Saline | Ape13 | ELA | Saline | Ape13 | ELA | |
n | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Weight (g) | 326 ± 7 | 321 ± 5 | 333 ± 7 | 332 ± 7 | 339 ± 10 | 320 ± 5 |
Mean AP (mmHg) | 147 ± 8 | 143 ± 14 | 149 ± 12 | 185 ± 17 | 152 ± 19 | 112 ± 15* |
Systolic AP (mmHg) | 183 ± 12 | 179 ± 19 | 186 ± 16 | 234 ± 19 | 194 ± 23 | 141 ± 16** |
Diastolic AP (mmHg) | 129 ± 6 | 125 ± 12 | 131 ± 11 | 163 ± 13 | 131 ± 17 | 97 ± 14** |
Echocardiography | ||||||
HR (bpm) | 352 ± 15 | 372 ± 4 | 332 ± 5 | 370 ± 9 | 348 ± 12 | 333 ± 13 |
APPV (m/s) | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0,3 | 3.2 ± 0.2** |
FS (%) | 38.8 ± 3.3 | 39.8 ± 1.1 | 39.5 ± 0.7 | 32.4 ± 3.3 | 37.6 ± 3.3 | 45.8 ± 2.1* |
LVESD (mm) | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 3.4 ± 0.2* |
LVEDD (mm) | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.2 |
AWTS (mm) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1** |
PWTS (mm) | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1** |
Peptide Synthesis and Administration
[Pyr1]-Apelin-13 (hereafter referred as Ape13; molecular weight: 1,533.82 g/mol) is synthesized at 0.1 mmol scale using solid phase peptide synthesis, as previously described (Murza et al., 2015). Briefly, 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin (2-CTC, 120 mg) was loaded with Fmoc-L-Phe-OH (0.85 mmol/g). Fmoc protecting group was removed by treating the resin with a 20% piperidine solution. The coupling steps were carried out using [hexafluorophosphate of O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium] (HATU, 5 equiv), amino acid (5 equiv) and DIPEA (5 equiv). The final peptide was cleaved from resin using a cocktail of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/triisopropylsilane (TIPS)/ethanedithiol (EDT)/water (92.5/2.5/2.5/2.5) and purified by preparative HPLC (ACE5 C18 column 250 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm spherical particle size). The linear precursor peptide of human Elabela-32 (hereafter referred as Elabela; molecular weight: 3,950.79 g/mol) was synthesized with the same protocol mentioned above (2-CTC, 500 mg, loading 0.2 mmol/g). After peptide cleavage, the disulfide bridge was made using a solution of 10% Iodine/MeOH (dropwise until persistent yellow color observed). Finally, peptide was purified by preparative HPLC. Purity (>99%) and authenticity of both peptides were confirmed by UPLC-MS and HRMS. Previously, we have shown from in vitro competitive binding assays that Ape13 and Elabela displaced the radioligand [Glp65, Nle75, Tyr77][125I]-Apelin-13 with comparable affinity (Ki = 0.37 ± 0.04 and 0.19±0.02 nM, respectively) for the APJ receptor (Murza et al., 2016). This led us to test an equimolar dose (10 nmol/kg/hr) of Ape13 and Elabela (i.e., 15 μg/kg/hr and 39 μg/kg/hr, respectively) in a cecal-ligation puncture model of in vivo experimental sepsis induced in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Coquerel et al., 2017). In this previous study, we showed that Ape13 improved the survival of these rats to the same extent than Elabela. Therefore, the rationale for this study was to administer by subcutaneous infusion, using osmotic pumps (Alzet model 2006, Alza Corp., CA, United States), the same equimolar dose (10 nmol/kg/hr) of Ape13 and Elabela in male 10-week-old SHR rats fed for 6 weeks with normal-or high-salt diets, as these doses were shown to be effective in experimental in vivo sepsis models.
Echocardiography and Invasive Hemodynamics
Transthoracic echocardiography was performed under isoflurane anesthesia (2%; 1.5 ml/min; Baxter) with the Vevo 3,100 ultrasound apparatus using a MX250 transducer (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, ON, Canada). A short axis view of the left ventricle (LV) was obtained at the level of the papillary muscle and the M-mode tracing was recorded. LV End-Diastolic and End-Systolic Diameters (LVEDD; LVESD) were measured in order to calculate the fractional shortening (FS). Stroke volume was next calculated in order to assess Cardiac Output (CO) and Cardiac Index (CI). Pulse propagation velocity (PPV) was determined by ultrasound measurements of the abdominal aorta using EKV-image acquisition and analyzed with Vevo-Vasc software (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, ON, Canada). For invasive hemodynamic measurements, rats were intubated under isoflurane anesthesia (2%; 1.5 ml/min; Baxter, IL, United States) and ventilated (SAR-1000, CWE). The right carotid artery was then cannulated with a pressure catheter (1.9F, Transonic, NY, United States) and advanced into the LV to record end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR
Total RNA was extracted from heart and kidneys using RNeasy Mini kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad) was used to prepare cDNA from 1 µg of total RNA in 20 µL. Real-time PCR was performed on technical duplicates with cDNA diluted 30x in nuclease-free water and using SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) in a Mastercycler® ep RealPlex (Eppendorf). The Ribosomal protein L30 (Rpl30) of heart or kidney was used as a reporter gene and fold changes were obtained using the 2(-ΔΔCt) method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Data were then normalized to SHR rats receiving a standard chow diet containing 0.3% of NaCl. Primer sequences are given in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Gene ID (mRNA RefSeq) | Gene description | Sequences (5'->3′) |
---|---|---|
Rpl30 (NM_022699.4) | Ribosomal protein L30 | Fwd: TCTTGGCGTCTGATCTTGGT |
Rev: AAGTTGGAGCCGAGAGTTGA | ||
Apln (NM_031612.3) | Apelin | Fwd: CATGGCCTCTTCCTTAGCTC |
Rev: CAGCGGCAATAGAACAGAGA | ||
Ela (XM_039095067.1) | Elabela | Fwd: ACTTCATTCTCGAGTGCCCTTC |
Rev: TGGATCCGAAAAGCCATCCAA | ||
Aplnr (NM_031349.2) | Apelin receptor | Fwd: CTTCTAGGCACCACAGGCAA |
Rev: GAGCGTCTCTTTTCTCGGCT | ||
Tgfb2 (NM_031131.2) | Transforming growth factor beta 2 | Fwd: GACTTACTGCAGGAGAAGGCAA |
Rev: CACTGAGCCAGAGGATGTTGTA | ||
Col1a1 (NM_053304.1) | Collagen type I alpha 1 chain | Fwd: GTACATCAGCCCAAACCCCA |
Rev: CAGGATCGGAACCTTCGCTT | ||
Acta1 (NM_019212.3) | Actin, alpha 1, skeletal muscle | Fwd: AGGACCTGTACGCCAACAAC |
Rev: GGGTGCGCCTAGAAGCATT | ||
Ace (NM_012544.1) | Angiotensin I converting enzyme | Fwd: TTTGCTACACAAATGGCACTTGT |
Rev: CGGGACGTGGCCATTATATT | ||
Ace2 (NM_001012006.2) | Angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 | Fwd: CGCTGTCACCAGACAAGAA |
Rev: CGTCCAATCCTGGTTCAAG | ||
Mme (NM_012608.2) | Neprilysin | Fwd: CAAACACAAACTCTGGGGTGAG |
Rev: AGGACGCATGGAGTAACACA |
Radioligand Binding
HEK293 cells stably expressing the YFP epitope-tagged human APJ were washed once with PBS and subjected to one freeze-thaw cycle. Broken cells were gently scraped in resuspension buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA), centrifuged at 3,500 g for 15 min at 4°C and resuspended in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2% bovine serum albumin, containing 140 mM or 330 mM NaCl). For total heart binding experiments, tissues were minced in extraction buffer (250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 1x cocktail of protease and phosphatase inhibitors from ThermoFisher), centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 30 min before resuspension in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin). Competitive radioligand binding experiments were performed by incubating cell membranes (15 µg) or total heart extraction (500 µg) with 0.2 nM [Glp65, Nle75, Tyr77][125I]-Apelin-13 (820 Ci/mmol) and increasing concentrations of Ape13 or Elabela (10−11 to 10−5 M) for 1 h at room temperature in a final volume of 200 µL. Bound radioactivity was separated from free ligand by filtration through GF/C glass fiber filter plates (Millipore, Billerica, MA) pre-soaked for 1 h in polyethylenimine 0.2% at 4°C and washed three times with 170 µL of ice-cold washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2% bovine serum albumin). Receptor-bound radioactivity was measured in a γ-counter 1470 Wizard form PerkinElmer (80% counting efficiency). Bmax was calculated using the formula Bmax = IC50 (Bo/T) from the displacement studies, where IC50 represents the molar dose of Apelin-13 at which 50% of the bound tracer was displaced, Bo is the amount of cpm bound at equilibrium in the absence of unlabeled Apelin-13, and T is the total amount of cpm added in the incubation (Swillens, 1992). Dissociation Ki was calculated from the IC50 value using Cheng-Prusoff equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973), and all binding data were calculated and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, United States) and represented as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.
Peptide Stability
Rat enzymes rACE2 and rNEP were purchased from Sino Biological (Beijing, China) while rACE was obtained from EMD Millipore (Burlington, MA, United States). Enzymes were dissolved in milli-Q water (at 1 µM for rACE2/rNEP and 1.65 µM for rACE), aliquoted and stored at −80°C, as recommended by suppliers. Buffer for enzymatic assay (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 10 µM ZnCl2) was prepared like previously described (McKinnie et al., 2016). First, 5 µL of Ape13 (1 mM) or Elabela (1 mM) was mixed with 5 µL of N,N-dimethylbenzamide (5 mM, internal standard) and diluted in 95 µL buffer. Before adding the enzyme, the blank sample (t = 0 min) was prepared by removing 10 µL of this mixture and quenched with 10 µL of EDTA 0.5 M. To initiate the enzymatic reaction, 5 µL of enzyme (1 µM or 1.65 µM) was added to the mixture (final enzyme concentration around 50 nM or 82 nM). This mixture was kept in an incubator at 37°C equipped with an orbital shaker (300 rpm). Ten µL was sampled at 5, 10, 20, 60, and 120 min from this mixture, and quenched with 10 µL EDTA 0.5 M (prepared in milli-Q water and filtered) to inactivate the enzyme. Samples were diluted with 40 µL water and analyzed using an UPLC-MS system from Waters (MA, United States) (Acquity UPLC® Protein BEH C4 column (2.1 × 50 mm) packed with 1.7 µm particles, pore 300 Å) with the following gradient: acetonitrile and water with 0.1% HCOOH (0→0.2 min: 5% acetonitrile; 0.2→1.5 min: 5%→95%; 1.5→1.8 min: 95%; 1.8→2.0 min: 95%→5%; 2.0→2.5 min: 5%). First analyses (t = 0 min, t = 120 min) scanned m/z from 300–1200 to evaluate if peptides are cleaved and peptide fragments will be detected. After identifying the m/z of peptides and fragments, peptides were quantified using single ion mode (SIM). During the assay with rNEP, Elabela was partially oxidized (5–45% from t = 0 min to t = 120 min), both oxidized and non-oxidized products were measured to have a total amount of ELA. Angiotensin II was used as reference substrate in the assay with rACE2 and rNEP and angiotensin I was used as reference substrate in the assay with rACE. Experiments were repeated 3-5 times. Percentage of remaining peptide was plotted to an exponential decay curve using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, United States).
Data and Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean values ± SEM. Comparisons of two experimental groups was determined using Student’s two-tailed t-test. Comparisons of parameters among more than two groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s correction for post hoc multiple comparisons when F ANOVA achieved p < 0.05, and there was no significant variance in homogeneity. Normal distribution and variance homogeneity were assessed by using the Shapiro-Wilk test. All statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, United States) and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
High-Salt Diet Alters the Apelinergic System in Hypertensive Rats
In order to evaluate the potential of APJ as a pharmacological target, we first carried out experiments with 10-week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) fed on a standard-(0.3% NaCl) or high-salt (8% NaCl) diet (Matavelli et al., 2007). After completing 6 weeks of the diet, the mRNA expression of APJ was significantly increased in heart and kidney of high-salt-treated SHR rats as compared to SHR rats fed with a standard-salt diet (Figures 1A,B). As shown by ligand-receptor binding assays, this upregulation was accompanied by increased APJ protein expression in the heart of SHR rats supplemented with a high-salt diet (Bmax: 54 ± 0.1 fmol/mg), compared with SHRs fed a standard-salt diet (Bmax: 7.3 ± 0.1 fmol/mg) (Figure 1C), without any change in Ki (0.55 ± 0.2 nM and 0.76 ± 0.1 nM, respectively). We also found that the mRNA expression of the endogenous ligand Ape13 was significantly upregulated in kidneys of SHR rats fed with high-salt diet, whereas only an upward trend in the expression of Elabela was observed (Figure 1B). Interestingly, beside Apln upregulation in kidneys, none of the apelinergic system’s genes were differentially expressed in the heart and kidneys of SHR compared with normotensive WKY adult rats (Supplementary Figure 1). Thus, these results suggest that high-salt intake per se increases the expression of APJ in heart and kidneys of SHR rats. To further assess the effect of high sodium intake on APJ receptor binding, we conducted competition binding studies with Ape13 and Elabela in the presence of varying sodium concentrations, previously determined based on sodium concentrations found in serum (140 mM [NaCl]) and urine (330 mM [NaCl]) of SHR-rats receiving high-salt diet (Figure 1D). We observed a sodium-dependent dichotomic effect on Ape13 and Elabela binding affinities for APJ (Figure 1E). Indeed, when sodium concentration is increased to 330 mM, an improvement in the Elabela affinity can be measured (Ki330nM: 0.19 ± 0.1 nM vs. Ki140nM: 0.89 ± 0.6 nM), whereas it is the reverse for Ape13 (Ki330nM: 12.3 ± 2.3 nM vs. Ki140nM: 3.36 ± 0.2 nM). Overall, these results indicate that the apelinergic system is salt-sensitive, with upregulation of expression in key pressure-regulating organs. In addition, Elabela appears to be more effective than Ape13 in binding APJ under high-salt conditions.
Continuous ELA Infusion Alleviates Cardiovascular Dysfunction and Remodeling Induced by Dietary Salt Intake and Hypertension
We next investigated the cardiovascular effects of a continuous 6-week infusion of equimolar doses (10 nmol/kg/hr) of Ape13, the predominant Apelin fragment detected in circulation (Zhen et al., 2013), or Elabela in SHR rats. Interestingly, we observed abolition of hypertension induced by a high-salt diet after Elabela treatment, while Ape13 had no significant effect (Figure 2A). This cardioprotective effect of Elabela on hypertension results in a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and left ventricular end-systolic (LVESP), suggesting reduced afterload in salt-loaded SHR animals (Figures 2A,B). In addition, Elabela treatment and to a lower extent Ape13 significantly improved cardiac function impaired by the high-salt diet, resulting in recovery of fractional shortening (FS), cardiac index (CI), and ejection fraction (EF) (Figures 2B,C; Table 1). Similarly, sustained Elabela infusion protected salt-loaded SHR animals from cardiac hypertrophy, as evidenced by the significant decrease of LV anterior and posterior wall thickness as well as heart weight (HW/BW) and left ventricular weight (LVW/BW) (Figure 2D; Table 1). Interestingly, assessment of these cardiovascular parameters in normotensive WKY rats compared to SHRs suggests that chronic treatment for 6 weeks with Ape13 or Elabela does not prevent or reverse the cardiovascular damage caused by hypertension per se in SHR rats receiving daily normal-salt intake (Supplementary Figure 2). Furthermore, reduced LV end-diastolic pressures (LVEDP) and aortic pulse propagation velocity indicate that Elabela alleviated the LV and aortic stiffness in salt-loaded SHR animals. Moreover, histological analysis revealed that the high sodium diet was responsible for the appearance of areas of cardiac fibrosis in the perivascular regions of SHR hearts (Figure 2E). Consistently, Elabela treatment markedly downregulated the expression of pro-fibrotic collagen 1a (Col1a), skeletal muscle alpha-1 actin (Acta1), and transforming growth factor-β2 (Tgfb2) genes, which were significantly increased in the heart of salt-treated SHR rats (Figure 2F). No changes in animal body weight or heart rate were observed after agonist treatment (Table 1). Taken together, these results demonstrate that chronic exogenous Elabela treatment can protect salt-loaded SHR hearts from fibrosis and reveal the protective effects of Elabela on pressure overload, cardiovascular dysfunction and remodeling.
Sustained Infusion of Elabela Protects Salt-Loaded Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats From Renal Dysfunction and Remodeling
There is growing evidence demonstrating that severe myocardial fibrosis and biventricular dysfunction are associated with renal hemodynamic dysfunction in salt-loaded SHRs (Varagic et al., 2006; Matavelli et al., 2007). Accordingly, salt excess produced detrimental effects on renal function in SHR rats (Figures 3A–C). Importantly, only exogenous Elabela significantly restored renal function and fluid homeostasis in severe hypertensive rats, resulting in improved urinary output (UO), fluid balance (FB) and protection from kidney hypertrophy (Figures 3A–C). As observed in diseased heart, expression of the pro-fibrotic Col1a, Acta1, and Tgfb2 genes in kidneys were significantly increased in SHR rats placed on an 8% salt diet. Consistently, chronic infusion of Elabela markedly decreased the expression of these pro-fibrotic genes, while Ape13 only reduced the Tgfb2 mRNA level (Figure 3D). Altogether, these results indicate that Elabela is more effective than Ape13 in protecting salt-loaded hypertensive rats from renal dysfunction, hypertrophy, and remodeling.
Chronic Elabela Infusion Regulates the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in the Heart and Kidneys of Salt-Loaded Hypertensive Rats
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a key pathway involved in the regulation of fluid balance and blood pressure, both of which are altered in hypertensive salt-loaded rats. Moreover, it has been suggested that RAAS overactivation plays a crucial role in heart failure progression in rodents and promotes the negative effects of salt excess on heart and kidneys (Susic et al., 2009). Here, we observed that the high-salt diet in SHR rats led to a significant increase in angiotensin converting enzyme (Ace) mRNA expression, but not angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (Ace2) and neprilysin (Mme), both in the heart and kidneys (Figures 4A,B). Unlike Ape13 treatment, chronic infusion of Elabela had differential effects on the expression of these enzymes. In heart, Elabela counteracted the effect of high-salt exposure, normalizing the gene expression of ACE, while ACE2 and neprilysin mRNA levels were significantly increased compared to salt-loaded hypertensive rats (Figure 4A). In the kidney, the increase in ACE expression in salt-loaded SHR rats was completely abolished after Elabela treatment, while neprilysin was not affected (Figure 4B). Finally, RAAS enzymes are known to degrade, regulate or inactivate apelin peptides (Vickers et al., 2002; McKinnie et al., 2016). To investigate the activity of RAAS proteases on the Elabela peptide, we compared the proteolytic activity of those purified enzymes on apelinergic ligands. Interestingly, ACE, ACE2, and neprilysin were all unable to cleave Elabela within 2 h, while Ape13 was rapidly and fully hydrolyzed by ACE2 and neprilysin and only partially by ACE (Figure 4C). Altogether, these data suggest that in addition to being resistant to RAAS enzyme degradation, Elabela may reduce the RAAS overactivation in the heart and kidneys in the pathogenesis of salt-induced hypertension.
Discussion
The main purpose of this study was to investigate if the Ape13-Elabela-APJ receptor axis may represent a therapeutic target for improving severe hypertension exacerbated by dietary high-salt intake. Similar to humans, SHR rats exhibit reduced cardiac output and increased total peripheral vascular resistance (Okamoto and Aoki, 1963; Ferrone et al., 1979; Doggrell and Brown, 1998). As observed in humans, the severity of hypertension in rats is worsened by excessive sodium intake, thereby exacerbating the pathological condition, such as increased blood pressure and cardiorenal dysfunction (Ahn et al., 2004; Matavelli et al., 2007; Whelton et al., 2012). Here, we demonstrate for the first time that Elabela is more effective than Ape13 in reducing high blood pressure, cardiorenal dysfunctions, fibrosis, and hypertrophy induced by a 6-week dietary high-salt intake in male SHR rats. Interestingly, these beneficial effects observed after continuous infusion of Elabela were associated with a counter-regulatory role of the ACE/ACE2/neprilysin axis of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in heart and kidneys of salt-loaded male SHR rats. The question of whether this is true in hypertensive female rats fed a high-salt diet still needs to be considered in view of the sexual dimorphism of hypertension, sex differences in the expression of RAAS components, and the significant impact of female sex hormones on salt-sensitive hypertension (Yanes et al., 2006; Sullivan et al., 2010; Bubb et al., 2012). Nonetheless, we highlighted the potent protective action of Elabela against salt-induced heart and kidney damage.
We first characterized the severity of hypertension and cardiorenal dysfunction in SHR rats fed high-salt diet (8% of NaCl) relative to SHRs on normal-salt chow (0.3% of NaCl). Consistent with previous reports (Varagic et al., 2006; Susic et al., 2010), the high-salt challenge was responsible for a significant collapse of cardiovascular and renal functions well supported by increased hypertrophy and fibrosis in heart and kidneys. This excessive sodium intake leading to severe hypertension was accompanied by a significant upregulation in the expression of APJ in both heart and kidneys. Apart from Ape13 in kidneys, mRNA expression of both endogenous ligands was not altered in these high-salt-treated SHR rats. This increase in the expression levels of APJ in salt-loaded SHR was associated with significant beneficial effects of Elabela and to a lesser extent of Ape13 on cardiac function, notably with an improvement in cardiac index and ejection fraction. Importantly, only Elabela reduced the high blood pressure, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis induced by excessive salt consumption. It would be very interesting to determine if the expression of APJ is also dependent on daily salt intake in salt-sensitive Dahl rats vs salt-resistant rats. Given some of the differences between SHR and salt-sensitive Dahl rats, such as renal metabolism and intermittent baroreflex dysfunction (Gu et al., 2020; Tian and Liang, 2021), future comparative studies of the effectiveness of Elabela in these murine models could provide mechanistic insights about the potential signaling pathways involved in the beneficial effects of Elabela on salt-induced cardiovascular and renal injury.
Since its discovery as the second endogenous ligand of the APJ receptor (Szokodi et al., 2002), Elabela has received growing interest given the pharmacological role of the Apelin-APJ system in a variety of physiological and pathological processes, which include cardiovascular and kidney diseases, but also metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes and obesity, cancer development and progression, ischemic stroke as well as neurodegenerative diseases (Scimia et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2018; Coquerel et al., 2018; Wysocka et al., 2018; Castan-Laurell et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019; Kinjo et al., 2020; Luo et al., 2020; Masoumi et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2020). In particular, similar to Ape13, Elabela which binds to APJ and activates the β-arrestin-2 and Gαi signaling pathways exerts protective effects against various cardiovascular diseases and related complications (Coquerel et al., 2018; Kuba et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020a; Liu et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2020; Xu, 2020). For instance, systemic administration of Elabela has been shown to improve cardiac function following acute myocardial infarction and derived cardiovascular events, including heart failure, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, arrhythmias, and stroke (Sato et al., 2017; Pan et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020). Consistently, a link between hypertension and Elabela defect has been observed in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in both rats and humans (Yang et al., 2017). Also known for its role in the development of fetal heart and blood vessels (Chng et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2020a), release of Elabela by the placenta also prevents the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, a severe form of gestational hypertension, by promoting placental angiogenesis (Ho et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019). Finally, activation of the Elabela-APJ receptor axis has recently been proposed as an alternative to the recommended catecholamines for supporting polymicrobial sepsis-induced inflammatory myocardial dysfunction (Chagnon et al., 2017; Coquerel et al., 2017).
In addition to its cardioprotective effect, the Ape13-Elabela-APJ receptor system plays an important role in renal physiology, notably in the regulation of fluid balance (Flahault et al., 2017). Indeed, the APJ receptor is expressed in the kidney and Ape13 has been found to exert vasoactive effects on afferent and efferent arterioles and to regulate the activity of the aquaporin water channel AQP2, thus controlling the diuresis, urine osmolality, and renal hemodynamic function (Hus-Citharel et al., 2008; Roberts et al., 2009; Hus-Citharel et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Boulkeroua et al., 2019). Unlike the wide tissue distribution of APJ and Ape13, Elabela is mainly expressed in the kidneys, especially in the inner medulla collecting duct and also acts as an aquaretic agent (Deng et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015b; O’Carroll et al., 2017). Interestingly, Elabela has recently been shown to be better than Ape13 in improving fluid homeostasis and in limiting renal dysfunction in various kidney diseases, such as diabetic nephropathy, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, renal fibrosis, and septic shock (Day et al., 2013; Lacquaniti et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2017; Coquerel et al., 2017; O’Carroll et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). Here, we found that chronic infusion of Elabela is more effective than Ape13 in protecting salt-loaded hypertensive rats from renal dysfunction, kidney hypertrophy, and remodeling. Accordingly, Elabela treatment was recently reported to preserve the glomerular structure, to prevent renal fibrosis and to block the expression of fibrosis-related genes in the kidneys of Dahl salt-sensitive rats on a high-salt diet and deoxycorticosterone acetate/salt-treated rats (Schreiber et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020b; Xu et al., 2020). Consistently, recent clinical data have shown, in contrast to Ape13, that the decrease in serum Elabela levels is also strongly associated with deterioration of renal function and worsening stages of chronic kidney disease (Lu et al., 2020).
It is well known that the progression of heart failure is closely linked to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and that the pharmacological modulation of RAAS by ACE inhibitors, aldosterone and angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor antagonists, or direct renin inhibitors can be beneficial for managing patients with hypertension and heart failure (McMurray et al., 2014; Solomon et al., 2017; Cosentino et al., 2019). In stressed heart, ACE is up-regulated inversely to ACE2, leading to an imbalance in the ACE/ACE2 ratio, increased production of Ang II, and disturbance in RAAS homeostasis, which promote Ang II-induced hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and fibrosis (Wang et al., 2015a; Yang et al., 2016). Consequently, vasodilatation and cardiorenal protective effects can be achieved with a shift from the detrimental ACE-Ang II-AT1R axis towards the activation of the ACE2-Ang (1-7)-Mas receptor axis (Iwai and Horiuchi, 2009; Mizuiri and Ohashi, 2015; Domenig et al., 2016). After 6 weeks of high-salt diet, we observed a significant upregulation of ACE expression in SHR heart. However, chronic treatment with Elabela counteracted this deleterious effect by downregulating ACE mRNA levels and by increasing cardiac ACE2 and neprilysin gene transcriptions, thereby possibly promoting the cardioprotective action of the ACE2-Ang (1-7)-Mas axis in SHR salt-loaded rats. Our results support previous findings demonstrating the opposing action and physiological crosstalk between the Ape13-APJ and Ang II-AT1R systems in regulating the cardiovascular function (Chatterjee et al., 2020). Indeed, while an increased vasopressor response to Ang II is found in APJ knockout mice, ACE2 is downregulated in apelin-deficient mice (Ishida et al., 2004; Sato et al., 2013). Likewise, Ape13 binding to APJ induces an upregulation of ACE2 expression in pathological hearts, increases the conversion of Ang II into Ang (1–7) and antagonizes the Ang II-AT1R signaling by promoting APJ-AT1R heterodimerization (Sato et al., 2013; Siddiquee et al., 2013). Finally, Elabela was demonstrated to antagonize Ang II-induced hypertension and cardiac damage, as shown here in high-salt-treated SHR rats (Sato et al., 2017).
In kidneys, increases in ACE/ACE2 ratio induced via the Ang II-AT1R axis have a significant influence on the development of severe renal damage and disease progression, such as diabetes, nephropathy and hypertension in humans (Wakahara et al., 2007; Mizuiri et al., 2008). In addition, it should be pointed that a diet high in salt enhances ACE activity in healthy normotensive rats and then alters the ACE/ACE2 balance leading to kidney damage (Hamming et al., 2008; Crestani et al., 2014; Mizuiri and Ohashi, 2015). Then, after 6 weeks of high daily salt intake, while it was maintained at a physiological concentration in serum, we observed a pronounced increase in sodium concentration in urine correlated with an increase expression of ACE in the kidneys. It has been demonstrated that intrarenal activation of RAAS can regulate blood pressure and water retention and operate independently of the systemic RAAS (Samuel et al., 2012), which could in part explain the differences in RAAS regulation observed between heart and kidneys. Importantly, our results reveal that chronic infusion of Elabela but not of Ape13 restores ACE expression in kidneys of salt-loaded SHR rats, without affecting the expression of neprilysin. These results are in agreement with recent findings showing that administration of exogenous Elabela to high-salt-loaded Dahl salt-sensitive rats is able to antagonize the intrarenal RAAS in the distal nephron, thereby resulting in lower blood pressure and protection against renal injury (Xu et al., 2020).
Apelin-13 has been reported to be one of the most potent endogenous inotrope positive agents of myocardial contractility (Szokodi et al., 2002; Perjes et al., 2016). We previously demonstrated that Elabela is superior to Ape13 in improving hemodynamics in isolated healthy rat hearts, suggesting that the two endogenous APJ ligands may exert cardio-protective effects with different potencies (Coquerel et al., 2017; Coquerel et al., 2018). To better understand how Elabela is more effective than Ape13 in treating the blood pressure raising effects caused by excessive daily salt intake, we also investigated the impact of sodium on ligand-receptor interaction. It has been reported that several class AG protein-coupled receptors, including APJ, share a sodium binding pocket that can allosterically affect the orthosteric ligand binding (Katritch et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2017). To mimic the sodium conditions in heart and kidneys of salt-loaded SHR rats, we then compared the in vitro affinity of Elabela and Ape13 for APJ at sodium concentrations measured in serum (i.e., 140 mM) and urine (i.e., 330 mM) from those hypertensive rats. Interestingly, the increased sodium concentrations appear to promote the binding of Elabela to APJ. At 330 mM sodium, corresponding to a state of sodium stress in kidney, APJ preferentially binds Elabela over Ape13 and then could partly explain why chronic infusion of Elabela is more effective to reduce intrarenal pressure and limits cardiorenal dysfunctions and fibrotic remodeling in salt-loaded SHR rats. Our results also indicated that the high-salt diet disrupts the balance between the opposing components of RAAS in the heart and kidneys of severely hypertensive rats. Importantly, the beneficial effects of apelin peptides are tightly regulated in a negative feedback loop by the increased activity of ACE2. Indeed, the action of apelin peptides is limited due to their rapid degradation by proteases, including ACE2 and neprilysin (Vickers et al., 2002; McKinnie et al., 2016). However, there is no information regarding the enzymatic activities of RAAS towards ELA. Then, we have compared the kinetics of hydrolysis of the endogenous ligands Elabela and Ape13 by the ACE, ACE2, and neprilysin purified enzymes. Surprisingly, none of these RAAS enzymes degrade ELA, while Ape13 is fully hydrolyzed by ACE2 and neprilysin and, shown for the first time, partially by ACE. This increased stability of Elabela with respect to ACE, ACE2 and neprilysin constitutes further evidence of its improved efficacy compared to Ape13 in these salt-treated hypertensive rats. These results also open new questions about the pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action of Elabela in salt-sensitive hypertension, which may be unique to this APJ ligand, and require further investigation.
In summary, our results demonstrate that the Elabela-APJ receptor axis is a key counter-regulator of the RAAS in salt-loaded SHR rats. In addition to being resistant to RAAS enzymes, Elabela could indeed restore the ACE/ACE2 balance and exert cardiorenal protective effects against salt-driven hypertension and kidney damage. In particular, activation of the Elabela-APJ axis has been found to regulate the myocardial contractility, to control the fluid homeostasis and to exert antihypertensive, vasodilatory, anti-fibrotic and anti-remodeling effects. Altogether, these findings highlight that the sustained released of Elabela may serve as a novel therapy for the management of hypertension among patients at high risk for cardiovascular and chronic kidney diseases.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Comité Facultaire de Protection des Animaux-Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé-Université de Sherbrooke.
Author Contributions
XS, DC, PS, and MA-M conceived the study and experiments. XS, DC, HG, AI, LD, KT, and CN performed the experiments and/or analyzed the results. XS, PS, and MA-M wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)–Project grants (376770, 389979, and 399567); Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) and CIHR (415361) postdoctoral fellowships to DC; CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best graduate scholarship to HG; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé (FMSS)–Université de Sherbrooke–Domenico-Regoli fellowship for graduate studies to LD; Senior Investigator Award of the Departoment of Medicine FMSS to OL; PS is the holder of the Canada Research Chair Tier 1 in the Neurophysiopharmacology of Chronic Pain and a member of the FRQS-funded Québec Pain Research Network.; FRQS–Junior 1 and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada–New Investigator awards to MA-M.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.709467/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
APJ, apelinergic receptor; SHR, spontaneously hypertensive rats; ACE, angiotensin conversion enzyme; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; Ape13, apelin-13; ELA, Elabela; AT1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor.
References
- Ahn J., Varagic J., Slama M., Susic D., Frohlich E. D. (2004). Cardiac Structural and Functional Responses to Salt Loading in SHR. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287, H767–H772. 10.1152/ajpheart.00047.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basting T., Lazartigues E. (2017). DOCA-Salt Hypertension: An Update. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 19, 32. 10.1007/s11906-017-0731-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boulkeroua C., Ayari H., Khalfaoui T., Lafrance M., Besserer-Offroy É., Ekindi N., et al. (2019). Apelin-13 Regulates Vasopressin-Induced Aquaporin-2 Expression and Trafficking in Kidney Collecting Duct Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 53, 687–700. 10.33594/000000165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bubb K. J., Khambata R. S., Ahluwalia A. (2012). Sexual Dimorphism in Rodent Models of Hypertension and Atherosclerosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 167, 298–312. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02036.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castan-Laurell I., Masri B., Valet P. (2019). The Apelin/APJ System as a Therapeutic Target in Metabolic Diseases. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 23, 215–225. 10.1080/14728222.2019.1561871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chagnon F., Coquerel D., Salvail D., Marsault E., Dumaine R., Auger-Messier M., et al. (2017). Apelin Compared with Dobutamine Exerts Cardioprotection and Extends Survival in a Rat Model of Endotoxin-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction*. Crit. Care Med. 45, e391–e398. 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee P., Gheblawi M., Wang K., Vu J., Kondaiah P., Oudit G. Y. (2020). Interaction between the Apelinergic System and ACE2 in the Cardiovascular System: Therapeutic Implications. Clin. Sci. (Lond) 134, 2319–2336. 10.1042/cs20200479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H., Wan D., Wang L., Peng A., Xiao H., Petersen R. B., et al. (2015). Apelin Protects against Acute Renal Injury by Inhibiting TGF-Β1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Basis Dis. 1852, 1278–1287. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H., Wang L., Wang W., Cheng C., Zhang Y., Zhou Y., et al. (2017). ELABELA and an ELABELA Fragment Protect Against AKI. Jasn 28, 2694–2707. 10.1681/asn.2016111210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H., Liu C., Cheng C., Zheng L., Huang K. (2018). Effects of Apelin Peptides on Diabetic Complications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 19, 179–189. 10.2174/1389203718666170918154728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen S., Chen F., Sun K., Zhou S., Wang J., Wang Q., et al. (2020a). Essential Role of the ELABELA-APJ Signaling Pathway in Cardiovascular System Development and Diseases. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 75, 284–291. 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z., Wu C., Liu Y., Li H., Zhu Y., Huang C., et al. (2020b). ELABELA Attenuates Deoxycorticosterone Acetate/salt-Induced Hypertension and Renal Injury by Inhibition of NADPH oxidase/ROS/NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway. Cell Death Dis 11, 698. 10.1038/s41419-020-02912-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng Y., Prusoff W. H. (1973). Relationship between the Inhibition Constant (K1) and the Concentration of Inhibitor Which Causes 50 Per Cent Inhibition (I50) of an Enzymatic Reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22, 3099–3108. 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chng S. C., Ho L., Tian J., Reversade B. (2013). ELABELA: a Hormone Essential for Heart Development Signals via the Apelin Receptor. Dev. Cel 27, 672–680. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chobanian A. V., Bakris G. L., Black H. R., Cushman W. C., Green L. A., Izzo J. L., Jr., et al. (2003). Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42, 1206–1252. 10.1161/01.hyp.0000107251.49515.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coquerel D., Chagnon F., Sainsily X., Dumont L., Murza A., Côté J., et al. (2017). ELABELA Improves Cardio-Renal Outcome in Fatal Experimental Septic Shock. Crit. Care Med. 45, e1139–e1148. 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coquerel D., Sainsily X., Dumont L., Sarret P., Marsault E., Auger-Messier M., et al. (2018). The Apelinergic System as an Alternative to Catecholamines in Low-Output Septic Shock. Crit. Care 22, 10. 10.1186/s13054-018-1942-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cosentino E. R., Degli Esposti D., Miceli R., Bentivenga C., Landolfo M., Fg Cicero A., et al. (2019). Sacubitril/valsartan Improves Both Functional and Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 35, 9–12. 10.1080/03007995.2019.1576481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crestani S., Gasparotto Júnior A., Marques M. C. A., Sullivan J. C., Webb R. C., Da Silva-Santos J. E. (2014). Enhanced Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Activity and Systemic Reactivity to Angiotensin II in Normotensive Rats Exposed to a High-Sodium Diet. Vasc. Pharmacol. 60, 67–74. 10.1016/j.vph.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day R. T., Cavaglieri R. C., Feliers D. (2013). Apelin Retards the Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 304, F788–F800. 10.1152/ajprenal.00306.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng C., Chen H., Yang N., Feng Y., Hsueh A. J. W. (2015). Apela Regulates Fluid Homeostasis by Binding to the APJ Receptor to Activate Gi Signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 18261–18268. 10.1074/jbc.m115.648238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doggrell S., Brown L. (1998). Rat Models of Hypertension, Cardiac Hypertrophy and Failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 39, 89–105. 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00076-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Domenig O., Manzel A., Grobe N., Konigshausen E., Kaltenecker C. C., Kovarik J. J., et al. (2016). Neprilysin Is a Mediator of Alternative Renin-Angiotensin-System Activation in the Murine and Human Kidney. Sci. Rep. 6, 33678. 10.1038/srep33678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du Cailar G., Mimran A., Fesler P., Ribstein J., Blacher J., Safar M. E. (2004). Dietary Sodium and Pulse Pressure in Normotensive and Essential Hypertensive Subjects. J. Hypertens. 22, 697–703. 10.1097/00004872-200404000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrone R. A., Walsh G. M., Tsuchiya M., Frohlich E. D. (1979). Comparison of Hemodynamics in Conscious Spontaneous and Renal Hypertensive Rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 236, H403–H408. 10.1152/ajpheart.1979.236.3.h403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flahault A., Couvineau P., Alvear-Perez R., Iturrioz X., Llorens-Cortes C. (2017). Role of the Vasopressin/Apelin Balance and Potential Use of Metabolically Stable Apelin Analogs in Water Metabolism Disorders. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 8, 120. 10.3389/fendo.2017.00120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frohlich E. D. (2008). The Role of Salt in Hypertension: the Complexity Seems to Become Clearer. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 5, 2–3. 10.1038/ncpcardio1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu F., Randall E. B., Whitesall S., Converso-Baran K., Carlson B. E., Fink G. D., et al. (2020). Potential Role of Intermittent Functioning of Baroreflexes in the Etiology of Hypertension in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. JCI Insight 5. 10.1172/jci.insight.139789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamming I., Van Goor H., Turner A. J., Rushworth C. A., Michaud A. A., Corvol P., et al. (2008). Differential Regulation of Renal Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 during ACE Inhibition and Dietary Sodium Restriction in Healthy Rats. Exp. Physiol. 93, 631–638. 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.041855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho L., Tan S. Y. X., Wee S., Wu Y., Tan S. J. C., Ramakrishna N. B., et al. (2015). ELABELA Is an Endogenous Growth Factor that Sustains hESC Self-Renewal via the PI3K/AKT Pathway. Cell Stem Cell 17, 435–447. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho L., Van Dijk M., Chye S. T. J., Messerschmidt D. M., Chng S. C., Ong S., et al. (2017). ELABELA Deficiency Promotes Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Malformations in Mice. Science 357, 707–713. 10.1126/science.aam6607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z., Wu L., Chen L. (2018). Apelin/APJ System: A Novel Potential Therapy Target for Kidney Disease. J. Cel Physiol 233, 3892–3900. 10.1002/jcp.26144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z., Luo X., Liu M., Chen L. (2019). Function and Regulation of Apelin/APJ System in Digestive Physiology and Pathology. J. Cel Physiol 234, 7796–7810. 10.1002/jcp.27720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hus-Citharel A., Bouby N., Frugière A., Bodineau L., Gasc J.-M., Llorens-Cortes C. (2008). Effect of Apelin on Glomerular Hemodynamic Function in the Rat Kidney. Kidney Int. 74, 486–494. 10.1038/ki.2008.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hus-Citharel A., Bodineau L., Frugière A., Joubert F., Bouby N., Llorens-Cortes C. (2014). Apelin Counteracts Vasopressin-Induced Water Reabsorption Via Cross Talk between Apelin and Vasopressin Receptor Signaling Pathways in the Rat Collecting Duct. Endocrinology 155, 4483–4493. 10.1210/en.2014-1257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwangbo C., Wu J., Papangeli I., Adachi T., Sharma B., Park S., et al. (2017). Endothelial APLNR Regulates Tissue Fatty Acid Uptake and Is Essential for Apelin's Glucose-Lowering Effects. Sci. Transl Med. 9. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad4000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishida J., Hashimoto T., Hashimoto Y., Nishiwaki S., Iguchi T., Harada S., et al. (2004). Regulatory Roles for APJ, a Seven-Transmembrane Receptor Related to Angiotensin-type 1 Receptor in Blood Pressure In Vivo . J. Biol. Chem. 279, 26274–26279. 10.1074/jbc.m404149200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwai M., Horiuchi M. (2009). Devil and Angel in the Renin-Angiotensin System: ACE-Angiotensin II-AT1 Receptor axis vs. ACE2-Angiotensin-(1-7)-Mas Receptor axis. Hypertens. Res. 32, 533–536. 10.1038/hr.2009.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Japp A. G., Cruden N. L., Barnes G., Van Gemeren N., Mathews J., Adamson J., et al. (2010). Acute Cardiovascular Effects of Apelin in Humans. Circulation 121, 1818–1827. 10.1161/circulationaha.109.911339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katritch V., Fenalti G., Abola E. E., Roth B. L., Cherezov V., Stevens R. C. (2014). Allosteric Sodium in Class A GPCR Signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 233–244. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kidoya H., Naito H., Muramatsu F., Yamakawa D., Jia W., Ikawa M., et al. (2015). APJ Regulates Parallel Alignment of Arteries and Veins in the Skin. Dev. Cel 33, 247–259. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinjo T., Higashi H., Uno K., Kuramoto N. (2020). Apelin/Apelin Receptor System: Molecular Characteristics, Physiological Roles, and Prospects as a Target for Disease Prevention and Pharmacotherapy. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 14, 210–219. 10.2174/1874467213666200602133032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuba K., Sato T., Imai Y., Yamaguchi T. (2019). Apelin and Elabela/Toddler; Double Ligands for APJ/Apelin Receptor in Heart Development, Physiology, and Pathology. Peptides 111, 62–70. 10.1016/j.peptides.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lacquaniti A., Chirico V., Lupica R., Buemi A., Loddo S., Caccamo C., et al. (2013). Apelin and Copeptin: Two Opposite Biomarkers Associated with Kidney Function Decline and Cyst Growth in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Peptides 49, 1–8. 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Wang L., Shi H. (2019). The Biological Function of ELABELA and APJ Signaling in the Cardiovascular System and Pre-eclampsia. Hypertens. Res. 42, 928–934. 10.1038/s41440-018-0193-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu W., Yan J., Pan W., Tang M. (2020). Apelin/Elabela-APJ: A Novel Therapeutic Target in the Cardiovascular System. Ann. Transl Med. 8, 243. 10.21037/atm.2020.02.07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu X., Liu S., Luan R., Cui W., Chen Y., Zhang Y., et al. (2020). Serum Elabela and Apelin Levels during Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease. Ren. Fail. 42, 667–672. 10.1080/0886022x.2020.1792926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo H., Han L., Xu J. (2020). Apelin/APJ System: A Novel Promising Target for Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Cel Physiol 235, 638–657. 10.1002/jcp.29001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Y., Yue Y., Ma Y., Zhang Q., Zhou Q., Song Y., et al. (2017). Structural Basis for Apelin Control of the Human Apelin Receptor. Structure 25, 858–866. 10.1016/j.str.2017.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Z., Song J. J., Martin S., Yang X. C., Zhong J. C. (2020). The Elabela-APJ axis: a Promising Therapeutic Target for Heart Failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 10.1007/s10741-020-09957-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maguire J. J., Kleinz M. J., Pitkin S. L., Davenport A. P. (2009). [Pyr1]Apelin-13 Identified as the Predominant Apelin Isoform in the Human Heart. Hypertension 54, 598–604. 10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.134619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masoumi J., Jafarzadeh A., Khorramdelazad H., Abbasloui M., Abdolalizadeh J., Jamali N. (2020). Role of Apelin/APJ axis in Cancer Development and Progression. Adv. Med. Sci. 65, 202–213. 10.1016/j.advms.2020.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matavelli L. C., Zhou X., Varagic J., Susic D., Frohlich E. D. (2007). Salt Loading Produces Severe Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction of Arterial Pressure in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 292, H814–H819. 10.1152/ajpheart.00671.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKinnie S. M. K., Fischer C., Tran K. M. H., Wang W., Mosquera F., Oudit G. Y., et al. (2016). The Metalloprotease Neprilysin Degrades and Inactivates Apelin Peptides. Chembiochem 17, 1495–1498. 10.1002/cbic.201600244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMurray J. J. V., Packer M., Desai A. S., Gong J., Lefkowitz M. P., Rizkala A. R., et al. (2014). Angiotensin-neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 993–1004. 10.1056/nejmoa1409077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizuiri S., Ohashi Y. (2015). ACE and ACE2 in Kidney Disease. Wjn 4, 74–82. 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizuiri S., Hemmi H., Arita M., Ohashi Y., Tanaka Y., Miyagi M., et al. (2008). Expression of ACE and ACE2 in Individuals with Diabetic Kidney Disease and Healthy Controls. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 51, 613–623. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murza A., Besserer-Offroy É., Côté J., Bérubé P., Longpré J.-M., Dumaine R., et al. (2015). C-terminal Modifications of Apelin-13 Significantly Change Ligand Binding, Receptor Signaling, and Hypotensive Action. J. Med. Chem. 58, 2431–2440. 10.1021/jm501916k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murza A., Sainsily X., Coquerel D., Côté J., Marx P., Besserer-Offroy É., et al. (2016). Discovery and Structure-Activity Relationship of a Bioactive Fragment of ELABELA that Modulates Vascular and Cardiac Functions. J. Med. Chem. 59, 2962–2972. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Carroll A. M., Salih S., Griffiths P. R., Bijabhai A., Knepper M. A., Lolait S. J. (2017). Expression and Functional Implications of the Renal Apelinergic System in Rodents. PLoS One 12, e0183094. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Dowd B. F., Heiber M., Chan A., Heng H. H. Q., Tsui L.-C., Kennedy J. L., et al. (1993). A Human Gene that Shows Identity with the Gene Encoding the Angiotensin Receptor Is Located on Chromosome 11. Gene 136, 355–360. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90495-o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okamoto K., Aoki K. (1963). Development of a Strain of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Jpn. Circ. J. 27, 282–293. 10.1253/jcj.27.282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Y., Li Q., Yan H., Huang J., Wang Z. (2020). Apela Improves Cardiac and Renal Function in Mice with Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Cel Mol Med. 24, 10382–10390. 10.1111/jcmm.15651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perjes A., Kilpio T., Ulvila J., Magga J., Alakoski T., Szabo Z., et al. (2016). Characterization of Apela, a Novel Endogenous Ligand of Apelin Receptor, in the Adult Heart. Basic Res. Cardiol. 111, 2. 10.1007/s00395-015-0521-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitkin S. L., Maguire J. J., Bonner T. I., Davenport A. P. (2010). International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIV. Apelin Receptor Nomenclature, Distribution, Pharmacology, and Function. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 331–342. 10.1124/pr.110.002949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts E. M., Newson M. J. F., Pope G. R., Landgraf R., Lolait S. J., O'carroll A.-M. (2009). Abnormal Fluid Homeostasis in Apelin Receptor Knockout Mice. J. Endocrinol. 202, 453–462. 10.1677/joe-09-0134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuel P., Ali Q., Sabuhi R., Wu Y., Hussain T. (2012). High Na Intake Increases Renal Angiotensin II Levels and Reduces Expression of the ACE2-At2r-MasR axis in Obese Zucker Rats. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 303, F412–F419. 10.1152/ajprenal.00097.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato T., Suzuki T., Watanabe H., Kadowaki A., Fukamizu A., Liu P. P., et al. (2013). Apelin Is a Positive Regulator of ACE2 in Failing Hearts. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 5203–5211. 10.1172/jci69608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato T., Sato C., Kadowaki A., Watanabe H., Ho L., Ishida J., et al. (2017). ELABELA-APJ axis Protects from Pressure Overload Heart Failure and Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Damage. Cardiovasc. Res. 113, 760–769. 10.1093/cvr/cvx061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schreiber C., Holditch S., Generous A., Ikeda Y. (2017). Sustained ELABELA Gene Therapy in High-Salt Diet-Induced Hypertensive Rats. Cgt 16, 349–360. 10.2174/1566523217666161121111906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scimia M. C., Hurtado C., Ray S., Metzler S., Wei K., Wang J., et al. (2012). APJ Acts as a Dual Receptor in Cardiac Hypertrophy. Nature 488, 394–398. 10.1038/nature11263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sekerci R., Acar N., Tepekoy F., Ustunel I., Keles-Celik N. (2018). Apelin/APJ Expression in the Heart and Kidneys of Hypertensive Rats. Acta Histochem. 120, 196–204. 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siddiquee K., Hampton J., Mcanally D., May L., Smith L. (2013). The Apelin Receptor Inhibits the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor via Allosteric Trans-Inhibition. Br. J. Pharmacol. 168, 1104–1117. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02192.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solomon S. D., Rizkala A. R., Gong J., Wang W., Anand I. S., Ge J., et al. (2017). Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. JACC: Heart Fail. 5, 471–482. 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan J. C., Bhatia K., Yamamoto T., Elmarakby A. A. (2010). Angiotensin (1-7) Receptor Antagonism Equalizes Angiotensin II-Induced Hypertension in Male and Female Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Hypertension 56, 658–666. 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.153668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Susic D., Zhou X., Frohlich E. D. (2009). Angiotensin Blockade Prevents Salt-Induced Injury of the Renal Circulation in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Am. J. Nephrol. 29, 639–645. 10.1159/000195633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Susic D., Varagic J., Frohlich E. D. (2010). Cardiovascular Effects of Inhibition of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Components in Hypertensive Rats Given Salt Excess. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 298, H1177–H1181. 10.1152/ajpheart.00866.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swillens S. (1992). How to Estimate the Total Receptor Concentration when the Specific Radioactivity of the Ligand Is Unknown. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 430–434. 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90139-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szokodi I., Tavi P., Földes G., Voutilainen-Myllylä S., Ilves M., Tokola H., et al. (2002). Apelin, the Novel Endogenous Ligand of the Orphan Receptor APJ, Regulates Cardiac Contractility. Circ. Res. 91, 434–440. 10.1161/01.res.0000033522.37861.69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tatemoto K., Hosoya M., Habata Y., Fujii R., Kakegawa T., Zou M.-X., et al. (1998). Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Endogenous Peptide Ligand for the Human APJ Receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 251, 471–476. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Z., Liang M. (2021). Renal Metabolism and Hypertension. Nat. Commun. 12, 963. 10.1038/s41467-021-21301-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y., Chen R., Jiang Y., Bai B., Yang T., Liu H. (2020). The Protective Effects and Mechanisms of Apelin/APJ System on Ischemic Stroke: A Promising Therapeutic Target. Front. Neurol. 11, 75. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varagic J., Frohlich E. D., Díez J., Susic D., Ahn J., González A., et al. (2006). Myocardial Fibrosis, Impaired Coronary Hemodynamics, and Biventricular Dysfunction in Salt-Loaded SHR. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290, H1503–H1509. 10.1152/ajpheart.00970.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vickers C., Hales P., Kaushik V., Dick L., Gavin J., Tang J., et al. (2002). Hydrolysis of Biological Peptides by Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Related Carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14838–14843. 10.1074/jbc.m200581200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wakahara S., Konoshita T., Mizuno S., Motomura M., Aoyama C., Makino Y., et al. (2007). Synergistic Expression of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 in Human Renal Tissue and Confounding Effects of Hypertension on the ACE to ACE2 Ratio. Endocrinology 148, 2453–2457. 10.1210/en.2006-1287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Li N., Gao F., Song R., Zhu S., Geng Z. (2015a). Balance between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 16, 553–558. 10.1177/1470320315576257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Yu D., Wang M., Wang Q., Kouznetsova J., Yang R., et al. (2015b). Elabela-apelin Receptor Signaling Pathway Is Functional in Mammalian Systems. Sci. Rep. 5, 8170. 10.1038/srep08170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whelton P. K., Appel L. J., Sacco R. L., Anderson C. A. M., Antman E. M., Campbell N., et al. (2012). Sodium, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 126, 2880–2889. 10.1161/cir.0b013e318279acbf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. S., Solomon S. D., Crivaro M., Conlin P. R. (2006). Dietary Sodium Intake Modulates Myocardial Relaxation Responsiveness to Angiotensin II. Transl. Res. 148, 49–54. 10.1016/j.trsl.2005.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright, Jr J. T., Jr., Bakris G., Greene T., Agodoa L. Y., Appel L. J., Charleston J., et al. (2002). Effect of Blood Pressure Lowering and Antihypertensive Drug Class on Progression of Hypertensive Kidney DiseaseResults From the AASK TrialEffect of Blood Pressure Lowering and Antihypertensive Drug Class on Progression of Hypertensive Kidney Disease: Results from the AASK Trial. JAMA 288, 2421–2431. 10.1001/jama.288.19.2421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wysocka M. B., Pietraszek-Gremplewicz K., Nowak D. (2018). The Role of Apelin in Cardiovascular Diseases, Obesity and Cancer. Front. Physiol. 9, 557. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu C., Wang F., Chen Y., Xie S., Sng D., Reversade B., et al. (2020). ELABELA Antagonizes Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System to Lower Blood Pressure and Protects against Renal Injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 318, F1122–F1135. 10.1152/ajprenal.00606.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu C. (2020). The Elabela in Hypertension, Cardiovascular Disease, Renal Disease, and Preeclampsia: An Update. J. Hypertens. 39, 12–22. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002591 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanes L. L., Romero D. G., Iles J. W., Iliescu R., Gomez-Sanchez C., Reckelhoff J. F. (2006). Sexual Dimorphism in the Renin-Angiotensin System in Aging Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 291, R383–R390. 10.1152/ajpregu.00510.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J., Feng X., Zhou Q., Cheng W., Shang C., Han P., et al. (2016). Pathological Ace2-To-Ace Enzyme Switch in the Stressed Heart Is Transcriptionally Controlled by the Endothelial Brg1-FoxM1 Complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E5628–E5635. 10.1073/pnas.1525078113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang P., Read C., Kuc R. E., Buonincontri G., Southwood M., Torella R., et al. (2017). Elabela/Toddler Is an Endogenous Agonist of the Apelin APJ Receptor in the Adult Cardiovascular System, and Exogenous Administration of the Peptide Compensates for the Downregulation of its Expression in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Circulation 135, 1160–1173. 10.1161/circulationaha.116.023218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu P., Ma S., Dai X., Cao F. (2020). Elabela Alleviates Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion-Induced Apoptosis, Fibrosis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction through PI3K/AKT Signaling. Am. J. Transl Res. 12, 4467–4477. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B. H., Wang W., Wang H., Yin J., Zeng X. J. (2013). Promoting Effects of the Adipokine, Apelin, on Diabetic Nephropathy. PLoS One 8, e60457. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H., Gong D., Ni L., Shi L., Xu W., Shi M., et al. (2018). Serum Elabela/Toddler Levels Are Associated with Albuminuria in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Cel Physiol Biochem 48, 1347–1354. 10.1159/000492093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhen E. Y., Higgs R. E., Gutierrez J. A. (2013). Pyroglutamyl Apelin-13 Identified as the Major Apelin Isoform in Human Plasma. Anal. Biochem. 442, 1–9. 10.1016/j.ab.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.