ABSTRACT
Vibrio cholerae is the etiologic agent of cholera, an acute and often fatal diarrheal disease that affects millions globally. We report the draft genome sequences of 13 non-O1/O139 V. cholerae strains isolated from the Rio Grande Delta in Texas. These genomes will aid future analyses of environmental serovars.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative curved bacterium that thrives in tropical and temperate aquatic ecosystems (1). The species was first identified as the cause of cholera by the Italian physician Filippo Pacini in 1854; the German physician and bacteriologist Robert Koch independently confirmed this discovery in 1883 (2). Toxigenic O1 serovar strains are responsible for pandemic disease outbreaks (3). In 1993, a subgroup of O1 strains converted to the O139 serogroup and caused local outbreaks but did not become pandemic (4). Additional serovars are commonly isolated from cholera patients (5), and a global increase in non-O1/O139 infections has been linked to climate change (6).
V. cholerae strains were isolated from plankton samples obtained from the following two sampling sites on the Rio Grande Delta along the Mexico-United States border where the cities of Matamoros and Brownsville form a transborder agglomeration: sites 21 (25°53′56.54″N, 97°29′52.09″W) and 42 (25°57′17.58″N, 97°08′44.42″W). Isolation was achieved by culture on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar plates (Becton, Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) incubated overnight at 30°C as described earlier (7). Genomic DNA was isolated from sucrose-fermenting CFUs by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solubilization and phenol-chloroform extraction. Amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region using the prVC-F and prVCM-R primers (8) was used for typing. Serogrouping was performed by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Tokyo, Japan, as described elsewhere (9). Sequencing libraries (100-bp paired-end format) were prepared using the TruSeq DNA library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to determine the library size and concentration. Sequencing was completed by Ambry Genetics Corporation (Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 device. The raw sequence reads were inspected for quality using FastQC version 0.11.5 (10) to inform the genome assembly settings. The draft genome sequences were assembled de novo using Edena version 3.131028 (11) with default settings, with the following two exceptions: the 3′ ends were truncated to remove the low-quality bases (option -t 10), and the minimum contig size was set at 500 bp (option -c 500). The Edena assembler features exact read matching and spurious read removal that obviates read preprocessing when working with HiSeq 2000 data. Annotation was completed using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 3.2 (12). Table 1 provides the accession numbers and general metrics of each assembly as well as the serogroup of each isolate. The draft genome sequences for DL4211 and DL4215 were described previously (13); however, those genomes were replaced in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank with the higher-quality assemblies described here.
TABLE 1.
Accession numbers, genome assembly metrics, and serogroups of the 13 V. cholerae isolates from the Rio Grande Delta
| Strain | GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. | No. of reads | Coverage (×)a | No. of contigs | N50 (bp) | GC content (%) | Size (bp) | Serogroupb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DL2111 | MSSN00000000 | SRR14319855 | 12,939,391 | 113.8 | 88 | 189,346 | 47.4 | 4,119,702 | Rough |
| DL2112 | MSSO00000000 | SRR14319854 | 6,980,134 | 64.0 | 107 | 123,726 | 47.4 | 4,118,072 | Rough |
| DL2113 | MSSP00000000 | SRR14319850 | 5,802,868 | 52.9 | 118 | 79,342 | 47.4 | 4,114,718 | Rough |
| DL2114 | MSSQ00000000 | SRR14319849 | 7,733,503 | 69.8 | 85 | 231,987 | 47.4 | 4,113,495 | O74 |
| DL2115 | MSSR00000000 | SRR14319848 | 9,312,550 | 82.5 | 97 | 164,794 | 47.4 | 4,119,886 | Rough |
| DL2116 | MSSS00000000 | SRR14319847 | 11,999,442 | 107.3 | 99 | 150,335 | 47.4 | 4,120,548 | Rough |
| DL2117 | MSST00000000 | SRR14319846 | 9,438,288 | 83.8 | 92 | 160,631 | 47.4 | 4,122,195 | Rough |
| DL4211 | MSSU00000000 | SRR14319845 | 51,281,125 | 441.3 | 113 | 200,733 | 47.5 | 4,043,910 | O123 |
| DL4212 | MSTE00000000 | SRR14319844 | 29,518,632 | 255.2 | 71 | 195,524 | 47.4 | 4,115,192 | O4 |
| DL4213 | MSTX00000000 | SRR14319843 | 9,241,571 | 82.5 | 78 | 269,860 | 47.6 | 4,031,163 | O109 |
| DL4214 | MSTF00000000 | SRR14319853 | 4,774,116 | 42.3 | 95 | 137,521 | 47.4 | 4,100,910 | O4 |
| DL4215 | MSTG00000000 | SRR14319852 | 46,233,778 | 412.7 | 67 | 205,170 | 47.5 | 4,005,821 | O113 |
| DL4216 | MSTH00000000 | SRR14319851 | 11,046,830 | 96.3 | 83 | 186,400 | 47.5 | 4,110,306 | O26 |
Coverage refers to the minimum required contig coverage set automatically by the assembler.
The rough designation describes isolates devoid of O antigen (9).
Data availability.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The 13 genome assemblies were organized under BioProject accession number PRJNA359496.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under grants AI137972-01, GM068855-02, and 5R01AI139103-02 and CIHR grants MOP-84473 and MOP-137106. We thank Paul Keller, who assisted in the collection of samples that led to the isolation and identification of the strains, and Eiji Arakawa for carrying out serotyping.
Contributor Information
Daniele Provenzano, Email: daniele.provenzano@utrgv.edu.
J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California.
REFERENCES
- 1.Escobar LE, Ryan SJ, Stewart-Ibarra AM, Finkelstein JL, King CA, Qiao H, Polhemus ME. 2015. A global map of suitability for coastal Vibrio cholerae under current and future climate conditions. Acta Trop 149:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lippi D, Gotuzzo E. 2014. The greatest steps towards the discovery of Vibrio cholerae. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:191–195. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ali M, Lopez AL, You YA, Kim YE, Sah B, Maskery B, Clemens J. 2012. The global burden of cholera. Bull World Health Organ 90:209–218A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.093427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Higa N, Honma Y, Albert MJ, Iwanaga M. 1993. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal isolated from patients with cholera-like disease in Bangladesh. Microbiol Immunol 37:971–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1993.tb01731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Theophilo GND, dos Prazeres Rodrigues D, Cintra Leal N, Hofer E. 2006. Distribution of virulence markers in clinical and environmental Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains isolated in Brazil from 1991 to 2000. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 48:65–70. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652006000200002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vezzulli L, Baker-Austin C, Kirschner A, Pruzzo C, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2020. Global emergence of environmental non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae infections linked with climate change: a neglected research field? Environ Microbiol 22:4342–4355. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Unterweger D, Kitaoka M, Miyata ST, Bachmann V, Brooks TM, Moloney J, Sosa O, Silva D, Duran-Gonzalez J, Provenzano D, Pukatzki S. 2012. Constitutive type VI secretion system expression gives Vibrio cholerae intra- and interspecific competitive advantages. PLoS One 7:e48320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chun J, Huq A, Colwell RR. 1999. Analysis of 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2202–2208. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.5.2202-2208.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shimada T, Arakawa E, Itoh K, Okitsu T, Matsushima A, Asai Y, Yamai S, Nakazato T, Nair GB, Albert MJ, Takeda Y. 1994. Extended serotyping scheme for Vibrio cholerae. Current Microbiol 28:175–178. doi: 10.1007/BF01571061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 11.Hernandez D, Francois P, Farinelli L, Osteras M, Schrenzel J. 2008. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res 18:802–809. doi: 10.1101/gr.072033.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kirchberger PC, Unterweger D, Provenzano D, Pukatzki S, Boucher Y. 2017. Sequential displacement of type VI secretion system effector genes leads to evolution of diverse immunity gene arrays in Vibrio cholerae. Sci Rep 7:45133. doi: 10.1038/srep45133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The 13 genome assemblies were organized under BioProject accession number PRJNA359496.
