ABSTRACT
Naked carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) is a second-grade animal under state protection of China. We report 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of the gut microbiota of Gymnocypris przewalskii. The three most abundant phyla are Tenericutes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria, and the six most abundant genera are Aeromonas, Clostridium, Cetobacterium, Shewanella, Prochlorococcus, and Vibrio.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Naked carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) is an endemic migratory species of Qinghai Lake, which is the largest salt lake in China. The adult fish spawn in freshwater and then return to Qinghai Lake. Research on Gymnocypris przewalskii is of great biological significance for protecting these rare animals and maintaining the ecological balance of Qinghai Lake. The gastrointestinal tract plays critical roles in nutrition, development, immunity, and resistance to invasive pathogens (1). However, our understanding of the intestinal microbiota of this migratory fish is limited. In this study, we analyzed the gut microbiota of Gymnocypris przewalskii during the migratory season. Fish were caught with a trawl net in Qinghai Lake (100.28N, 36.40E) and Buha River (99.78N, 36.72E). Their gut contents were collected and directly conserved in liquid nitrogen until further use. Total DNA was extracted from the gut contents (100 to 200 mg) using the FastDNA spin kit for feces (MP Biomedicals LLC, USA) following homogenization with a homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, France) at 5,000 rpm for 10 min. The V4 region of the gene was amplified using modified primers 515F (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) and TransStart FastPfu DNA polymerase (TransGen Biotech, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (2). PCR amplification was performed using the following cycling conditions: 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and, finally, 72°C for 10 min. The resulting PCR products were examined by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and further purified using a gel extraction kit (Omega Bio-tek, USA). The libraries were generated using PCR with Illumina adapters connected (New England BioLabs, USA) and were sequenced on the MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Library construction and sequencing were performed at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Raw fastq files were demultiplexed and quality filtered with QIIME2 v.2021.2 (3). UPARSE (USEARCH v.11.0) (http://drive5.com/uparse) (4) was utilized to conduct operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering analysis at 97% identity. Chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME v.4.2 (5). Representative sequences of OTUs were picked up against the Silva_132 16S database (http://www.arb-silva.de) to determine taxonomy.
All statistical analyses were performed with R v.4.0.2 (https://www.r-project.org) and the MicrobiomeAnalyst Web-based tool (https://www.microbiomeanalyst.ca) (6). The total number of reads obtained in this study was 125,158 (Table 1). OTUs were assigned to 16 bacterial phyla, 34 classes, 57 orders, 100 families, and 139 genera. The three most abundant phyla were Tenericutes (41.4%), Proteobacteria (28.7%), and Fusobacteria (15.7%) (Fig. 1a), and the six most abundant genera were Aeromonas (15.8%), Clostridium (7.8%), Cetobacterium (6.1%), Shewanella (5.3%), Vibrio (3.1%), and Prochlorococcus (2.8%) (Fig. 1b). Aeromonas strains cause a wide variety of aquaculture animal diseases, not only bringing serious economic losses to the aquaculture industry but also infecting people and animals through aquatic animals and aquatic products, leading to diarrhea and food poisoning (7, 8). The dominance of Aeromonas in the gut microbiota suggested that Gymnocypris przewalskii fish were plagued by such pathogens. The findings for other genera and species were similar to the findings of previous studies on the gut microbiota of fishes (9).
TABLE 1.
Summary of sample data
| Sample | Sample site | Environmental salinity (‰) | No. of raw reads | No. of filtered reads | No. of valid reads | Proportion of valid reads (%) | BioSample accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELJF1 | Qinghai Lake | 11.17 | 19,627 | 17,431 | 13,174 | 67.12 | SAMN18489513 |
| BHH1 | Buha River | 0.56 | 74,711 | 69,342 | 30,775 | 41.19 | SAMN18489514 |
| BHH2 | Buha River | 0.56 | 70,164 | 64,572 | 55,426 | 78.99 | SAMN18489515 |
| BHH3 | Buha River | 0.56 | 42,489 | 39,283 | 22,929 | 53.96 | SAMN18489516 |
| BHH4 | Buha River | 0.56 | 72,942 | 68,035 | 56,276 | 77.15 | SAMN18489517 |
| BHH5 | Buha River | 0.56 | 72,630 | 67,021 | 46,734 | 64.35 | SAMN18489518 |
FIG 1.
Relative abundance of the top bacterial phyla (a) and genera (b) in samples from different sampling sites.
Data availability.
Raw reads in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (accession number PRJNA717171).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province (grant 2017-ZJ-920Q) and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University (grant 2016-ZZ-03).
We are grateful to Luo Ying and Qi Hongfang (Rescue Center of Gymnocypris przewalskii of Qinghai Lake) for sample collection.
Contributor Information
Qiang Gao, Email: gaoqiang2016@foxmail.com.
Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University
REFERENCES
- 1.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. 2014. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157:121–141. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Caporaso JG, Fuhrman JA, Apprill A, Knight R. 2015. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1:e00009-15. 10.1128/mSystems.00009-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille MGI, Lee J, Ley R, Liu YX, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin BD, McDonald D, McIver LJ, Melnik AV, Metcalf JL, Morgan SC, Morton JT, Naimey AT, Navas-Molina JA, Nothias LF, Orchanian SB, Pearson T, Peoples SL, Petras D, Preuss ML, Pruesse E, Rasmussen LB, Rivers A, RobesonMS, II, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song SJ, Spear JR, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Torres PJ, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh PJ, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft JJJ, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber KC, Williamson CHD, Willis AD, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Knight R, Caporaso JG. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Edgar RC, Flyvbjerg H. 2015. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics 31:3476–3482. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J. 2017. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W180–W188. 10.1093/nar/gkx295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fernandez-Bravo A, Figueras MJ. 2020. An update on the genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, epidemiology, and pathogenicity. Microorganisms 8:129. 10.3390/microorganisms8010129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martino ME, Fasolato L, Montemurro F, Novelli E, Cardazzo B. 2014. Aeromonas spp.: ubiquitous or specialized bugs? Environ Microbiol 16:1005–1018. 10.1111/1462-2920.12215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Iwatsuki T, Kanazawa T, Ogasawara T, Hosotani K, Tsuchiya K, Watanabe S, Suzuki T, Moriuchi R, Kanesaki Y, Dohra H. 2021. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of gut microbiota in three species of deep-sea fish in Suruga Bay, Japan. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:e01260-20. 10.1128/MRA.01260-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw reads in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (accession number PRJNA717171).

