Abstract
Plants respond to warm temperature by increased elongation growth of organs to enhance cooling capacity. Phytohormones, such as auxin and brassinosteroids, regulate this growth process. However, our view on the players involved in warm temperature-mediated growth remains fragmentary. Here, we show that warm temperature leads to an increased expression of JOXs and ST2A, genes controlling jasmonate catabolism. This leads to an elevated 12HSO4-JA level and consequently to a reduced level of bioactive jasmonates. Ultimately this results in more JAZ proteins, which facilitates plant growth under warm temperature conditions. Taken together, understanding the conserved role of jasmonate signalling during thermomorphogenesis contributes to ensuring food security under a changing climate.
Subject terms: Plant development, Jasmonic acid, Heat
Plants undergo morphological changes to enhance cooling at warm temperatures. Here Zhu et al. show that JOXs and ST2A enzymes, which mediate jasmonate catabolism, contribute to this process by reducing the level of bioactive jasmonate facilitating growth responses.
Introduction
Climate change impacts crop productivity and small increases in average temperatures are predicted to lead to large decreases in crop yield1. In plants, architectural adaptations to high ambient temperatures (referred to as thermomorphogenesis) allow improved cooling by evaporation to withstand warm temperatures2. Also in wheat, shoot elongation is promoted by high ambient temperatures3 (Supplementary Fig. 1). In Arabidopsis thaliana, phytochromes, such as phytochrome B (phyB), and the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) are central and required regulators of warm temperature-mediated growth2. In addition, plant hormones, such as auxin and brassinosteroids, are critical regulators of thermomorphogenesis2. Notably, while jasmonic acid (JA) signaling plays a vital role in various stress responses4, including wound response, cold stress, and heat stress, whether and how JA impacts warm temperature-mediated organ growth remains unknown.
JA biosynthesis and signaling pathways are well characterized5. The enzyme JASMONATE RESISTANT 1 (JAR1) conjugates JA with isoleucine to yield the bioactive version jasmonoyl-(l)-isoleucine (JA-Ile), which is perceived by a receptor complex including CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1 (COI1) and a JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN (JAZ) protein. The JAZ proteins inhibit the functioning of target transcription factors, such as the MYCs, and are subject to 26S proteasome-mediated degradation following ubiquitination by the SCFCOI1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex to modulate JA responses. To control JA signaling, the availability of bioactive JA (mainly JA-Ile) is a critical factor, and thus there are numerous metabolic reactions that convert JA to other active, inactive, or partially active compounds. For example, the three endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized cytochrome P450 oxidases CYP94B1, CYP94B3, and CYP94C1 generate the JA derivatives 12-hydroxy JA-Ile (12OH-JA-Ile) and 12-carboxy JA-Ile (12COOH-JA-Ile), the amidohydrolases IAR3 and ILL6 cleave JA-Ile back to free JA and in addition act on 12OH-JA-Ile, defining an indirect biosynthetic route to 12-hydroxy JA (12OH-JA), and the four JASMONATE-INDUCED OXYGENASES (JOXs)/JASMONIC ACID OXIDASES (JAOs) redundantly catalyze the oxidation of JA to 12OH-JA6. Subsequently, 12OH-JA can be sulfated by the sulfotransferase ST2A to form 12-hydroxy jasmonoyl sulfate (12HSO4-JA)6,7.
Here, we report that JAZ proteins are stabilized by a warm temperature that promotes hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. This repression of COI1-mediated JAZ degradation is due to reduced levels of bioactive JA. Furthermore, complementary analyses in wheat indicate that the role of JA in regulating seedling’s growth at warm temperature is conserved.
Results and discussion
Our observation of COI1 phosphorylation in wheat seedlings exposed to 34 °C for 1 h (Supplementary Fig. 2) prompted us to investigate the role of JA signaling in warm temperature-mediated wheat growth. Wheat seedlings overexpressing Arabidopsis or wheat 12-OXOPHYTODIENOATE REDUCTASE 3 (OPR3), a key enzyme in JA biosynthesis6, which display mild and variable elevated 3-oxo-2-(2-(Z)-pentenyl) cyclopentane-1-butyric acid (OPC4) and JA levels8,9 (Supplementary Fig. 3), or wheat seedlings treated with JA methyl ester (MeJA) exposed to a growth-promoting temperature displayed a significantly shorter second leaf than their respective control plants or treatment (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Figs. 4, 5). Thus, JA represses warm temperature-mediated wheat seedling growth.
To further explore a possibly conserved role of JA and JA signaling in warm temperature-mediated growth, we then focused on hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis, which is a hallmark for thermomorphogenesis2. Warm temperature-triggered hypocotyl elongation was largely repressed by MeJA treatment at 28 °C in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). In contrast, the Arabidopsis aos mutant, which lacks JA10, displays a slightly longer hypocotyl at 28 °C compared to wild type (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). In agreement with previous observations11, MeJA also leads to reduced Col-0 hypocotyl growth at 21 °C, but this is less pronounced than at 28 °C (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 6b). For further analyses, we used 30 µM MeJA, as this resulted in an obviously shorter hypocotyl at 28 °C compared to control plants at 21 °C. This effect of 30 µM MeJA at 28 °C is also reflected in the expression of EXPANSIN-LIKE A 2 (EXLA2), a positive regulator of cell elongation12, and EXPANSIN A8 (EXPA8), encoding an auxin-induced cell wall-modifying enzyme involved in turgor-driven cell expansion13, which is upregulated at 28 °C, but repressed by MeJA at 28 °C (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). It should be noted that, in contrast to EXPA8, EXLA2 is not rapidly upregulated by 28 °C (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Furthermore, the expression of PIF4 targets INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE 29 (IAA29) and YUC814 was (partially) reduced by MeJA at 28 °C (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Interestingly, the expression of HSP70, a transcriptional marker for warm temperature response15, is not downregulated by MeJA at 28 °C (Supplementary Fig. 7a), indicating that the overall temperature perception is not affected. Taken together, these results indicate that JA represses warm temperature-mediated organ growth in distinct species.
Next, we checked if the MeJA-mediated repression of hypocotyl length at 28 °C required the core JA signaling components, such as COI1, the JAZ proteins, and the MYCs. The hypocotyl of the coi1-21 mutant16, the myc2 myc3 myc4 mutant17, and lines overexpressing JAZ proteins18,19 were significantly longer than the wild type at 28 °C (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 8), further indicating that JA signaling exerts repression on growth at a warm temperature. Furthermore, coi1-21 and myc2 myc3 myc4 mutant seedlings were less sensitive to 30 µM MeJA at 28 °C (Fig. 1h, i and Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). In contrast, hypocotyl length of coi1-21, myc2 myc3 myc4, and 35S::JAZ1:GUS lines was hardly affected by 30 µM MeJA at 21 °C (Supplementary Fig. 10). In addition, lines producing truncated JAZ3 proteins lacking the C-terminal Jas domain that plays a key role in destabilizing JAZ repressors in response to increased JA levels19, such as jai3-1 or 35S::JAZ3-Δjas-GFP, were also less sensitive to exogenous 30 µM MeJA application at 28 °C (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 9c, d). Conversely, the hypocotyl length of the 35S::JAZ3:GFP and 35S::JAZ1:GUS seedlings, overexpressing wild-type JAZ proteins, was still repressed by 30 µM MeJA at 28 °C, comparable to MeJA-treated Col-0 at 28 °C (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 9e). We furthermore observed that in the hypocotyl of the 35S::JAZ1:GUS line18, the JAZ1:GUS levels strongly and within a few hours increased at 28 °C compared to 21 °C, while the JAZ1:GUS expression levels remained unaltered (Fig. 1j, k and Supplementary Figs. 7c, 11a). Similarly, in the hypocotyl of the 35S::Jas9-VENUS line20, the Jas9-VENUS levels increased at 28 °C compared to 21 °C (Supplementary Fig. 12). Taken together, this indicates that JAZ proteins are stabilized in the hypocotyl at 28 °C. Notably, however, the strong JAZ1:GUS signal at 28 °C could be fully suppressed by 30 µM MeJA (Fig. 1j, k), indicating that JAZ degradation can be triggered by exogenous MeJA under warm temperature. However, the increased JAZ levels are in contrast to the 28 °C-mediated increase in COI1 levels (Supplementary Fig. 11b), which is similar to previous observations of a heat-mediated increase in COI1 levels21. Nonetheless, together our data indicate that JA represses thermomorphogenesis and that this requires the JA signaling machinery. Specifically, high levels of JAZ repressor proteins (in coi1 or 35S::JAZΔjas lines) or the absence of MYC-mediated response (in myc2 myc3 myc4) result in a long hypocotyl at 28 °C. Our data support the stabilization of JAZ proteins and reduced JA signaling at 28 °C, and furthermore suggest that this is likely, not due to an impaired perception of JA at 28 °C.
Since degradation of JAZ proteins is dependent on the availability of the bioactive JA, JA-Ile5, we speculated that warm temperature affects the availability of bioactive JA. To test this hypothesis, we measured JA-Ile levels in both Arabidopsis and wheat seedlings exposed to high temperature. This indeed revealed that high temperature leads to a clear reduction in JA-Ile levels in Arabidopsis and to a reduction, although less pronounced, in JA-Ile levels in wheat (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 13). However, the expression of several enzymes involved in JA biosynthesis was not affected or even up-regulated at warm temperature (Supplementary Fig. 14). Furthermore, in Arabidopsis, cis-(+)-12-oxo phytodienoic acid (OPDA) and 10-oxo dinor-phytodienoic acid (dn)-OPDA were not significantly affected and even showed a trend of increase at warm temperature like the expression of the regulatory enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 15a, b). In wheat, however, this trend is less uniform, varies for different compounds, and differs between the varieties (Supplementary Fig. 15a, c–e). Next, we, therefore, focused on the diverse catabolic processes that control the level of bioactive JA-Ile, such as JOX-mediated oxidation of JA followed by ST2A-mediated sulfation, CYP94-mediated oxidation of JA-Ile and 12OH-JA-Ile, and deconjugation of JA-Ile and 12OH-JA-Ile by IAR3 and ILL66,7.
First, an iar3 ill6 cyp94b1 cyp94b3 cyp94c1 pentuple mutant, which displays increased JA-Ile levels22, displayed a slightly shorter hypocotyl at high temperature compared to the wildtype (Supplementary Fig. 16a). This further supported that reducing JA-Ile is required to promote hypocotyl growth at a warm temperature. However, while IAR3, ILL6, and CYP94 expression levels were upregulated by warm temperature in Arabidopsis (Supplementary Fig. 16b, c), the levels of 12OH-JA-Ile and 12COOH-JA-Ile were not higher at control versus high temperature in Arabidopsis or wheat (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 16d) and the iar3 ill6 double or cyp94b1 cyp94b3 cyp94c1 triple mutants did not display a hypocotyl phenotype at warm temperature (Supplementary Fig. 16e). This indicated that this pathway is not the main mechanism to control JA-Ile levels under warm temperature.
Second, with respect to the JOXs and ST2A-mediated catabolic pathway, 12OH-JA levels were below the detection limit in Arabidopsis, and 12OH-JA levels were not higher at control versus high temperature in wheat (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 17). However, while 12HSO4-JA levels in Arabidopsis were not changed, the 12HSO4-JA levels were strongly increased in wheat (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 18). In addition, expression of JOX and ST2A, genes encoding for the enzymes involved in regulating the catabolic processes leading to 12HSO4-JA, was significantly upregulated at warm temperature in both wheat and Arabidopsis, but—at least in Arabidopsis—this increase in expression is time-of-day-dependent23,24 (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 19). To explore whether JOX and ST2A-mediated catabolism contribute to Arabidopsis thermomorphogenesis, we first used a 35S::JOX1 line as a genetic tool to reduce the levels of JA and JA-Ile at high temperature25 (Supplementary Fig. 20). We observed a longer hypocotyl of the 35S::JOX1 line at 28 °C compared to the control, while no difference was observed at 21 °C (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 21a). Next, to confirm the role of JOX proteins in Arabidopsis thermomorphogenesis, we measured the hypocotyl of jox1, jox2, jox3, jox4 single mutants, and a jox1 jox2 jox3 jox4 (jox-Q) quadruple mutant25 at 21 °C and 28 °C. This revealed a significantly shorter hypocotyl and less increased growth for jox1, jox2, jox3, jox4, and jox-Q seedlings compared to the wildtype at 28 °C and at warm temperature relative to 21 °C, respectively (Fig. 3c, d and Supplementary Fig. 21b). The rather modest phenotype of the jox-Q mutants may be attributed to other catabolic pathways taking over. Indeed, we observed reduced levels of JA and JA-Ile in jox-Q at 28 °C, compared to the elevated levels at 21 °C (Supplementary Fig. 22). Next, we also explored if ST2A is important for thermomorphogenesis. Indeed, both st2a-1 and st2a-2 displayed a shorter hypocotyl at 28 °C compared to the wildtype (Fig. 3e, f and Supplementary Fig. 21c). Finally, we also observed that JOXs and ST2A are required for other thermomorphogenesis phenotypes, such as petiole length and angle2 (Supplementary Figs. 21d and 23). The importance of JA and JA-Ile catabolic processes at high temperature is further reflected in the increased sensitivity of jox-Q and iar3 ill6 cyp94b1 cyp94b3 cyp94c1 to MeJA treatment at 28 °C (Supplementary Fig. 24). Taken together, this supports that organ growth under warm temperature conditions requires a tight control of available JA-Ile levels, mainly through JOX and ST2A-mediated catabolism. It should be noted that although jox and st2a mutants display obvious warm temperature-associated phenotypes, we did not detect 12OH-JA or a change in 12HSO4-JA at warm temperature in Arabidopsis to support this. This may indicate that also other regulatory mechanisms, such as glycosylation of 12OH-JA26, may be involved in the reduction of JA and JA-Ile levels at warm temperature in Arabidopsis.
In conclusion, warm temperature leads to an increased expression of genes controlling JA catabolism. Subsequent altered levels of bioactive JA-Ile stabilize JAZ proteins, which in turn facilitates plant growth. Similarly, the neighbor competition promotes plant growth by upregulating ST2A that acts to reduce the bioactive JA molecules in a phyB-dependent manner7. Additionally, high temperature enhances JA-dependent defense responses in tomato, resulting from increased COI1 levels and wounding-induced bioactive JA levels21. Our data add an additional layer of control where bioactive JA levels are tightly controlled at a warm temperature to modulate JAZ protein levels and accommodate warm temperature-mediated growth. The balance between levels of bioactive JA and the amount of COI1 determines—together with JAZ expression levels—JAZ protein levels and thus the response; and this seems to depend on the type of stress and even the combination of stresses. It is important to note that plants have a narrow temperature range for optimal growth and warm temperature-mediated growth promotion, and outside this range—such as extreme cold or heat—JA levels and signaling can be regulated differently leading to different responses. A broader understanding of the conserved role of jasmonate signaling when plants are exposed to low or high temperatures contributes to ensuring food security under a changing climate.
Methods
Plant material and growth conditions
All A. thaliana plants used in this study were in the Col-0 reference accession genetic background and referred to as wild type. The following A. thaliana lines were used: aos (ref. 10), coi1-21 (ref. 16), myc2 myc3 myc4 (ref. 17), jai3-1 (ref. 19), jox1-4 single mutants (ref. 25), jox-Q (ref. 25), st2a-1 and st2a-2 (ref. 7), iar3 ill6 (ref. 22), cyp94b1 cpy94b3 cpy94c1 (ref. 22), iar3 ill6 cyp94b1 cpy94b3 cpy94c1 (ref. 22), 35S::JOX1 (ref. 25), 35S::JAZ1:GUS (ref. 18), 35S::JAZ3:GFP (ref. 19), 35S::JAZ3-Δjas-GFP (ref. 19), 35S::Jas9-VENUS (with 35S::H2B-RFP background) (ref. 20), 35S::GFP-COI1. For phenotypic characterization, seeds were surface sterilized and vertically grown on square plates with medium containing ½ Murashige-Skoog basal salt (½ MS) (Duchefa), 1% agar, and 1% sucrose. Seeds were stratified for 3 days at 4 °C firstly and then transferred to a growth chamber at 21 °C, with continuous light (70–100 μmol m−2 s−1) at 50% relative humidity for germination. After germination, seeds on vertical plates were transferred to short-day conditions of 8 h light/16 h dark either at 21 °C or 28 °C (100 μmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation supplied by cool-white, fluorescent tungsten tubes, Osram). Additionally, seeds for JA treatment were sown onto sterilized mesh on medium as mentioned above. After germination, the seeds with mesh were transferred to a medium as mentioned above supplemented with DMSO as mock or 30 µM MeJA (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 39924-52-2) for JA treatment at 21 °C or 28 °C. Plates were scanned at 7 days after germination, unless indicated otherwise. The wheat seeds used in this study were from hexaploid wheat cultivars: Chinese Spring27, Sar-60, Tr-3 and Tr-18 (ref. 9), KN199, and TaOPR3OE #3 (ref. 8). The seeds were put on wet paper enclosed by plastic wrap and kept at 4 °C for 3–4 days, and then transferred to room temperature in the darkness for 1 day for germination. Seeds that germinated uniformly were selected and grown in plastic pots containing soil at the temperatures of interest under 16 h light/8 h dark (100 µmol m–2 s–1 photosynthetically active radiation, supplied by cool-white, fluorescent tungsten tubes, Osram) and 65–75% air humidity. In addition, for JA treatment in wheat plants, 5 ml mock (DMSO) or 200 µM MeJA solution was injected into soil grown with 1 day after germination (DAG) wheat seedlings at the temperatures of interest. The injection was applied every 3 days (three times injection in total). Phenotyping pictures were taken with a Canon digital camera. Measurement was done by using Fiji/ImageJ (https://imagej.net/Fiji). For protein extraction, 7-days-old 35S::GFP-COI1 seedlings were grown at 21 °C and 28 °C in short-day conditions on ½ MS solid medium. Or, 5-days-old 35S::Jas9-VENUS seedlings were grown at 21 °C in short-day conditions on ½ MS solid medium, then 5-days-old seedlings were transferred to ½ MS liquid medium to adapt for 1 day at 21 °C at the same conditions. After adapting to the liquid medium, seedlings were transferred to a new liquid medium supplemented with DMSO as a mock for 20 h at 21 °C or 28 °C. Protein quantification was done by using Fiji/ImageJ (https://imagej.net/Fiji). For GUS expression, GUS staining and GUS activity, 5-days-old 35S::JAZ1-GUS seedlings were grown onto sterilized mesh at 21 °C in the absence or presence of 30 µM MeJA and 28 °C in the absence or presence of 30 µM MeJA in short-day conditions on ½ MS solid medium. For short-term treatment, 5-days-old 35S::JAZ1-GUS seedlings were grown onto mesh at 21 °C in short-day conditions on ½ MS solid medium, then 5-days-old seedlings with mesh were transferred to ½ MS solid medium as mentioned above supplemented with mock or JA treatment at 28 °C for 12 h. Or, 5-days-old Col-0 seedlings were grown onto mesh at 21 °C in short-day conditions on ½ MS solid medium, then 5-days-old seedlings with mesh were transferred to ½ MS solid medium as mentioned above supplemented with mock or JA treatment at 21 and 28 °C for 12 h.
Gene expression analyses
Shoot samples from 7-days-old or short-term (12 h) treated Arabidopsis seedlings were harvested at dawn or noon. 10-days-old wheat (Chinese Spring) seedlings were collected during the day. Three or six biological replicates were performed for each condition and each tested gene. Total RNA from Arabidopsis shoots or wheat seedlings was extracted and purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNA digestion was done on columns with RNase-free DNase I (Promega). The Superscript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Quantabio) was used for cDNA synthesis from 1 µg of RNA. qRT-PCR was performed on a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics) in 384-well plates with LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN 7 (ARP7) and the TRANSLATIONAL ELONGATION FACTOR ALPHA (EF1α) genes were used as Arabidopsis internal reference genes. ACTIN (GenBank locus AB181991.1) and CELL DIVISION CONTROL PROTEIN (GenBank locus Ta.46201) were used as wheat internal reference genes. The wheat primers were designed as follows: The wheat orthologues of the Arabidopsis genes were identified using gene trees available at EnsemblPlants based on the IWGSC gene models. The orthologous relationship between wheat and Arabidopsis genes was confirmed using reciprocal BLAST on EnsemblPlants. Each qPCR primer pair was selected on the conserved part in complete exons within homoeologues. All primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Analysis of relative gene expression data was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT method.
GUS staining assay
35S::JAZ1-GUS seedlings were fixed for 30 min in ice-cold 90% (v/v) acetone and rinsed with NT buffer (100 mM Tris/50 mM NaCl), incubated in X-Gluc (500 µg ml−1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronide) solution (500 µl 100 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 600 µl X-Gluc + 28.8 ml NT-buffer), and incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 6-8 h. The reaction was stopped by rinsing with NT-buffer, then seedlings were mounted in 80% lactic acid on a slide and imaged.
Quantitative GUS activity assay
The GUS activity assay was performed according to a previously published method, with some modifications28. For this, 5-days-old 35S::JAZ1-GUS shoot samples were harvested at dawn. Three biological replicates were performed for each condition. Finely ground material from 50 to 100 mg of shoots was homogenized in 500 μl of GUS extraction buffer (100 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.1% SDS, 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.1% Triton X-100), adding 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 25 μg ml−1 PMSF (ThermoFisher Scientific) just before use. Samples were centrifuged at 20,817×g at 4 °C for 10 min and the supernatant (crude extract) was transferred to new pre-cooled 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes that were kept on ice. Next, 10 μl of crude extract was added to the 1.5 ml tubes with 37 °C prewarmed reaction mix containing 1 mM 4-MUG (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 6160-80-1) in GUS extraction buffer (up to 15 samples per run) within 30 seconds. After exactly 10 min of incubation at 37 °C, a 20-μl aliquot of each reaction was transferred to the first corresponding group of wells containing 180 μl stop reagent (1 M sodium carbonate) in a black 96-well cell culture plate with a flat bottom (Greiner Bio-One, CAS: 655086). After exactly 20 min of incubation at 37 °C, a 20-μl aliquot of each reaction was transferred to the second corresponding group of wells containing 180 μl stop reagent. The 4-MU (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 90-33-5) standard curve was prepared by diluting 1 µM 4-MU stock solution to 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 nM in stop reagent. The fluorescence of the standard curve solutions and each set of samples (10-min and 20-min samples) was measured using an excitation wavelength of 355 nm, an emission wavelength of 460 nm, and a filter wavelength of 430 nm by EnVision® 2105 multimode plate reader. A standard curve of fluorescence against concentration was plotted. The total protein concentration was determined in each sample using the Qubit™ Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The standard curve was used to calculate the amount of 4-MU per unit of time (i.e., nmol min−1 ml−1) for each sample. GUS activity was calculated in (nmol 4-MU) min−1 (mg protein)−1.
Confocal microscopy
Five-day-old 35S::Jas9:N7-VENUS seedlings at 21 and 28 °C were imaged on a Leica SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Scanner and detectors settings used for one experiment were optimized to avoid saturation and to maximize resolution and kept unchanged throughout the experiment. VENUS was excited using the 514 nm line (Leica SP8). VENUS fluorescence was collected from 520 to 560 nm (using the AOBS of the SP8). RFP was excited using a 561-nm laser diode (SP8). RFP fluorescence was collected from 590 to 680 nm (using the AOBS of the SP8). Images were taken using the ×40 objective, to maximize the number of nuclei being observed.
Western blotting
Total protein extracts were pooled from two biological replicates. Plants (35 S::GFP-COI1 and 35S::Jas9-VENUS seedlings) were frozen in liquid nitrogen, grinded by Retsch MM400, and homogenized in 600 µl ice-cold homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40 and a Roche Complete protease inhibitor; 1 tablet/10 ml). The tubes were centrifuged for 15 min at 20,817×g at 4 °C and the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml tube. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined by using the Qubit™ Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After addition of sample buffer [10×], the samples were heated for 10 min at 95 °C, centrifuged again, separated on 4–15% SDS-PAGE stain-free protein gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA), and blotted on a Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Mini PVDF Transfer Packs (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 4% DifcoTM Skim Milk (BD Life Sciences, USA). After blocking, membranes were washed 4-5 times using PBS-T (PBS with 0.05% TWEEN® 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA)). For immunodetection, anti-GFP-HRP antibody (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec, catalog number: 130-091-833) at 1:5000 was used to incubate membranes for 1 h at room temperature. The proteins were detected by ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA). After imaging, membranes were stripped using stripping buffer (1:1–1.5 ml 10% SDS: 1.5 ml 100 mM Glycine mix) for 90 s. Membranes were washed 4-5 times using dH2O, followed by 3–4 times washing with PBS-T. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature and washed 4–5 times using PBS-T as described above. The membrane for proteins was immune-reacted with anti-RFP (Chromotec, catalog number:6G6) (1:2000) and mouse IgG HRP linked whole antibody (GE Healthcare, USA, catalog number:NA931) (1:10,000). The proteins were detected by a ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA).
Metabolite measurements
Seven-days-old Arabidopsis shoot samples were harvested during the day. 10-days-old wheat seedlings were collected during the day, 2–3 wheat plant shoots were pooled as one biological replicate. Plants were frozen in liquid nitrogen, grinded by mortar and pestle. Phytohormones were extracted with methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), reversed phase-separated using an ACQUITY UPLC® system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) and analyzed by nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) (TriVersa Nanomate®; Advion BioSciences, Ithaca, NY, USA) coupled with an AB Sciex 4000 QTRAP® tandem mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) employed in scheduled multiple reactions monitoring mode29.
Statistical analyses and reproducibility
Phenotypic quantification, metabolite measurement, and relative gene expression data were analyzed using either One-way or Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) in GraphPad Prism 8. In some cases, data were analyzed using Students’ t-test with two-sample equal variance and one-tailed distribution. For box plots, the lower Tukey-based whisker shows the smallest value that is greater than the lower quartile minus 1.5× interquartile range, the upper Tukey-based whisker shows the greatest value that is smaller than the upper quartile plus 1.5× interquartile range and data points outside this range (outliers) are plotted as individual dots.
Phylogenetics
The orthologues of the Arabidopsis genes in other species (Brachypodium, wheat, rice, maize, and barely) were identified using gene trees available at EnsemblPlants. The amino acid sequences of the orthologs were aligned by the “Align by Muscle” function and then the phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using an UPGMA statistical method implemented in MEGA5.05 and then manually edited.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Clara Williams for useful discussions, Alexey V. Pigolev and Dmitry N. Miroshnichenko for generating AtOPR3OE wheat lines, and Laurens Pauwels for generating 35S::GFP-COI1. We thank G. van den Ackerveken, C. Ballaré, and S. Vanneste for providing materials. We acknowledge the Germplasm Resources Unit (GRU) at JIC for providing wheat seeds. T.Z. is supported by a grant from the Chinese Scholarship Council, I.F. acknowledges funding through the German Research Foundation (DFG, INST 186/822-1) and A.G. acknowledges funding from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO G008417N).
Source data
Author contributions
I.D.S. initiated and managed the project, designed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; T.Z. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; C.H. performed metabolite measurements, analyzed data, and commented on the manuscript; M.X. and T.S. contributed wheat lines and critically revised the manuscript; I.F. analyzed data and commented on the manuscript; A.G. designed experiments, analyzed data and commented on the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and approved the manuscript.
Data availability
All data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review informationNature Communications thanks Scott Hayes and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-24883-2.
References
- 1.Asseng S, et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change. 2014;5:143–147. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vu LD, Xu X, Gevaert K, De Smet I. Developmental plasticity at high temperature. Plant Physiol. 2019;181:399–411. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parent B, Tardieu F. Temperature responses of developmental processes have not been affected by breeding in different ecological areas for 17 crop species. N. Phytol. 2012;194:760–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ahmad P, et al. Jasmonates: multifunctional roles in stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:813. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Howe GA, Major IT, Koo AJ. Modularity in jasmonate signaling for multistress resilience. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 2018;69:387–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heitz T, Smirnova E, Marquis V, Poirier L. Metabolic control within the jasmonate biochemical pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019;60:2621–2628. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fernandez-Milmanda GL, et al. A light-dependent molecular link between competition cues and defence responses in plants. Nat. Plants. 2020;6:223–230. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0604-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tian, X. et al. Heat shock transcription factor A1b regulates heat tolerance in wheat and Arabidopsis through OPR3 and jasmonate signalling pathway. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1109–1111 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Pigolev, A. V. et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis OPR3 in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) alters plant development and freezing tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3989 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Park JH, et al. A knock-out mutation in allene oxide synthase results in male sterility and defective wound signal transduction in Arabidopsis due to a block in jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Plant J. 2002;31:1–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen J, et al. Inhibition of Arabidopsis hypocotyl elongation by jasmonates is enhanced under red light in phytochrome B dependent manner. J. Plant Res. 2013;126:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s10265-012-0509-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boron AK, et al. Over-expression of AtEXLA2 alters etiolated Arabidopsis hypocotyl growth. Ann. Bot. 2015;115:67–80. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simon NML, et al. The energy-signaling Hub SnRK1 is important for sucrose-induced hypocotyl elongation. Plant Physiol. 2018;176:1299–1310. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sun J, Qi L, Li Y, Chu J, Li C. PIF4-mediated activation of YUCCA8 expression integrates temperature into the auxin pathway in regulating Arabidopsis hypocotyl growth. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar SV, Wigge PA. H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2010;140:136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.He Y, Chung EH, Hubert DA, Tornero P, Dangl JL. Specific missense alleles of the arabidopsis jasmonic acid co-receptor COI1 regulate innate immune receptor accumulation and function. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fernandez-Calvo P, et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell. 2011;23:701–715. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.080788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thines B, et al. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCF(COI1) complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448:661–665. doi: 10.1038/nature05960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chini A, et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448:666–671. doi: 10.1038/nature06006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Larrieu A, et al. A fluorescent hormone biosensor reveals the dynamics of jasmonate signalling in plants. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6043. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Havko NE, et al. Insect herbivory antagonizes leaf cooling responses to elevated temperature in tomato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:2211–2217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913885117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marquis V, et al. Stress- and pathway-specific impacts of impaired jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile) catabolism on defense signalling and biotic stress resistance. Plant Cell Environ. 2020;43:1558–1570. doi: 10.1111/pce.13753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yamashino T, Kitayama M, Mizuno T. Transcription of ST2A encoding a sulfotransferase family protein that is involved in jasmonic acid metabolism is controlled according to the circadian clock- and PIF4/PIF5-mediated external coincidence mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2013;77:2454–2460. doi: 10.1271/bbb.130559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ding L, et al. Two B-Box domain proteins, BBX18 and BBX23, interact with ELF3 and regulate thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2018;25:1718–1728. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Caarls L, et al. Arabidopsis JASMONATE-INDUCED OXYGENASES down-regulate plant immunity by hydroxylation and inactivation of the hormone jasmonic acid. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:6388–6393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701101114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haroth S, et al. The glycosyltransferase UGT76E1 significantly contributes to 12-O-glucopyranosyl-jasmonic acid formation in wounded Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:9858–9872. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu D, et al. Wheat breeding in the hometown of Chinese Spring. Crop J. 2018;6:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blazquez, M. Quantitative GUS activity assay in intact plant tissue. CSH Protoc. pdb.prot4688 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Herrfurth C, Feussner I. Quantitative jasmonate profiling using a high-throughput UPLC-nanoESI-MS/MS method. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020;2085:169–187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0142-6_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.