Abstract
The hip suction seal plays a key role in distractive stability and maintenance of intra-articular fluid pressure of the hip. Preservation of the suction seal relies on the acetabular labrum and the congruence between the labrum and the femoral head−neck junction. During the treatment of cam-type impingement, iatrogenic over-resection in the femoral head−neck junction or labrum deficiency can cause loss of this suction seal. In this technical note, we describe a remplissage procedure performed in addition to labral reconstruction in a patient with loss of the suction seal due to a dysfunctional labrum and previous over-resection of a cam deformity.
Technique Video
The acetabular labrum plays an integral role in protecting articular cartilage by maintaining intra-articular synovial fluid and pressure.1, 2, 3 The labrum also has been recognized as a major contributor to distractive stability of the hip through the creation of a suction seal effect on the femoral head.1,4,5 As such, labral reconstruction allows for significant improvement in distractive stability compared with a partial labral resection.6
Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement occurs when a peripherally enlarged radius (caused by a bony lesion on the femoral neck) enters the acetabulum throughout range of motion.7 To alleviate this mechanical impingement, which is most prominent during flexion and internal rotation,8 and to restore the normal femoral head−neck articulation, bony overgrowth resection (femoroplasty) typically is performed.
Multiple studies have reported that incomplete cam deformity resection is the leading cause of failed hip arthroscopy.9, 10, 11 Conversely, over-resection of the cam deformity may lead to loss of the suction seal normally provided by the congruence between the femoral head and labrum.12,13 In a recent study, Mansor et al.14 reported that over-resection leads to worse clinical outcomes compared with under-resection and that the conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty is greater in patients with over-resection. If iatrogenic over-resection of a cam deformity occurs, a remplissage procedure using a soft-tissue graft may be used to restore the suction seal and normal articular anatomy.13
In this technical note, we describe a remplissage procedure performed in conjunction with a labral reconstruction in a patient with suction seal loss due to cam deformity over-resection and a dysfunctional labrum.
Surgical Technique (With Video Illustration)
Preoperative Evaluation and Planning
Clinically, providers may suspect a cam deformity over-resection in patients with unimproved or recurring pain after hip arthroscopy. A lateral hip radiograph, computed tomography (CT), and a 3-dimensional CT reconstruction image are useful in the detection and evaluation of an over-resection (Fig 1). Magnetic resonance imaging and CT are more useful than radiographs in preoperative planning by providing 3-dimensional images. In cases in which there is an indistinguishable continuity in the labrum and previously over-resected anterior femoral head−neck junction (Fig 2), labral reconstruction with semitendinosus allograft and hip remplissage may be performed.
Patient Positioning and Portal Placement
The patient is placed in a supine position using a distractor system table (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) after being prepared under general anesthesia. Joint distraction is confirmed with fluoroscopy, and the anterolateral (AL) portal and modified mid-anterior portal (mMAP) are created. An interporal capsulotomy is then created between these portals using an arthroscopic blade (Samurai; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI). Suspension sutures are passed to apply retraction with the help of a suture passer (Pivot Slingshot; Stryker) via the AL portal and mMAP. Central compartment diagnostic arthroscopy is performed using a 70° arthroscope (Arthrex, Naples, FL), followed by creation of the distal anterolateral accessory (DALA) portal. If labral tissue is preserved, a labral repair may be performed using previously described techniques.15 However, labral reconstruction is necessary if the labral tissue is deemed inadequate for repair (Fig 2A).
Labral Reconstruction
Following confirmation of significant labral deficiency, labral reconstruction using a semitendinosus allograft is performed (AlloSource, Centennial, CO). The length of the defective area in the labrum is measured with an arthroscopic measurement guide (SCR Guide; Arthrex). The graft should be 5- to 6-mm wide and approximately 30% longer than the measured defect length. Krackow stitches in a longitudinal fashion and nonlocked continuous suture (no. 2-0 VICRYL; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) are then used to prepare the graft. All knots should be placed on the superior portion of the graft to preserve a smooth interface between soft tissue and bone. Additional sutures should then be placed at both ends of the graft to avoid tearing that may occur during suture passage (Fig 3).
Graft insertion and fixation are performed similarly to the previously described “Kite Technique.”16 Following rim trimming, 2 anchors (1.4-mm NanoTack TT; Stryker) are placed. The first anchor is placed as posterior as possible and adjacent to the native labrum while the second anchor is placed as anterior as possible. Depending on the size of the defect, additional anchors may be evenly placed between the most anterior and posterior anchors. While viewing from the mMAP, the anchors are placed through the AL portal at the 11 and 12 o'clock positions. Additional anchors are placed through the DALA portal at the 1- and 2-o'clock positions while viewing from the AL portal. If enough labral tissue is present, one of the suture anchor threads from the chondrolabral junction or labrum remnant is then passed with a suture passer (NanoPass; Stryker) to prepare the area for graft placement (Fig 4).
At this stage, the proximal mid-anterior portal (PMAP) is created as an accessory portal. All suture anchor threads are pulled through the PMAP with the exception of the non-post sutures of the most anterior and most posterior anchors passing the labrum remnant. Post sutures from the most anterior and posterior anchors are marked with a marking pen to avoid tangling. Non-post sutures are pulled through the mMAP (Fig 5). A cannula (Pivot TransPort 789 cannula, 110-140 mm, Pivot; Stryker) is then placed in the mMAP to allow for graft passage.
Using a free needle, the non-post sutures from the most anterior and posterior anchors are pierced through each end of the graft. Simple half hitches are then used to create a knot at the end of the suture.
The post sutures previously marked through the PMAP are pulled in a controlled manner, and the graft is advanced from the mMAP to the acetabular rim. The post threads belonging to the posterior anchor are pulled, allowing for placement of the posterior part of the graft first. After proper placement of the graft is confirmed arthroscopically, the loop knots that were previously created on the non-post suture in the anterior and posterior portion of the graft are opened sequentially and retied according to standard arthroscopic knot tying principles. The most anterior knot is viewed from the AL portal and tied through a cannula in the mMAP, and the posterior knot is viewed from the mMAP and tied through a cannula in the AL portal (Fig 6). Threads from the mid-body anchors that were previously passed through the labrum remnant are passed through the graft in a simple or horizontal mattress fashion and tied accordingly (Fig 7). For procedures at 11 and 12 o’clock, the AL portal is used as the working portal, whereas the mMAP is used at 1 and 2 o’clock.
Remplissage
After labrum reconstruction, traction is released, and attention is turned to the peripheral compartment. Because the interportal capsulotomy will provide sufficient visibility for the remplissage procedure, a T-capsulotomy is not needed. Dynamic hip examination is then performed, allowing for evaluation of the over-resection and for detection of the point where the suction seal is lost. Remplissage should be performed in the area where the suction seal disappears (Fig 8). The hip is in 20 to 30° flexion throughout the procedure. While using the mMAP for viewing, the cannula is placed in the DALA portal, and 2 anchors (1.4 mm NanoTack TT; Stryker) are placed in the most medial and lateral areas of future graft fixation. The distance between the 2 anchors is measured by the arthroscopic measurement guide (SCR Guide; Arthrex). Using the remainder of the semitendinosus allograft previously used for labral reconstruction, another graft is prepared for the remplissage procedure in the same fashion described above for labral reconstruction. The graft should measure 30% longer than the distance between the medial and lateral anchors. The graft width is determined according to the measured depth of the defect. One thread from each anchor is retrieved from the mMAP, and the other threads are retrieved from the canula in the DALA portal. Using a free needle, the non-post sutures from the most medial and most lateral anchors are pierced through each end of the graft. Simple half hitches are used to create a knot to itself at the end of the suture. The post sutures in the mMAP are then pulled in a controlled manner, and the graft is advanced from the DALA portal to the defect area where remplissage will be performed. After placement of the graft is confirmed, temporary loops in the most medial and most lateral area of the graft are opened and arthroscopically tied through the DALA portal (Fig 8 C and D).
A third anchor (1.8-mm Knotless Hip FiberTak; Arthrex) is placed more proximally (Fig 9) to increase the congruency of the femoral head and acetabulum by elongating the graft from the mid-body. The knotless anchor thread is passed through the graft to form a loop, is tensioned, and subsequently locked.
After remplissage and labral reconstruction, dynamic hip examination is again performed to evaluate graft fixation and position and reestablishment of the suction seal (Fig 10). Interportal capsulotomy is then closed with the help of a suture passer (Pivot Slingshot; Stryker), completing the procedure. The hip arthroscopy technique of a left hip is shown in Video 1.
Rehabilitation
In the initial postoperative period (postoperative day 1), active rehabilitation is focused on the passive and low-force active range of motion with circumduction. Within the first 3 weeks of the postoperative period, the patient is limited to 20 pounds weight-bearing with use of props and should wear a de-rotational boot. At postoperative week 3, the patient should be weaned from crutches and advance weight-bearing. At this time, focus is shifted to re-establishing normal gait during ambulation. At postoperative week 6, open-and-closed chain exercises are started while progressing range of motion. Exercises focusing on return to sport are started after 12 weeks postoperatively. Gradual return to sport may occur 4 to 6 months following surgery.
Discussion
Suction seal loss, which may occur from over-resection of a cam deformity or labral damage, can lead to impaired lubrication and nutrition to the articular cartilage in the hip, accelerating cartilage degeneration.15 As such, loss of the suction seal warrants treatment.13 Here, we have described a technique to restore the suction seal using a hip "remplissage" technique, in which the area of defect in the femoral head-neck junction is filled with soft tissue. This technique is comparable to the remplissage technique used in the shoulder for the treatment of Hill−Sachs defects.13 In the case described here, the patient presented with irreparable labrum tissue in addition to a previously over-resected cam lesion, requiring labral reconstruction and remplissage application to the over-resection area with a semitendinosus allograft. Dynamic hip examination performed intraoperatively allowed for confirmation of the suction seal restoration using this method (Table 1).
Table 1.
Pearls |
|
|
|
|
|
Pitfalls |
|
|
|
Accurate detection of the previously over-resected portion of the femoral head-neck junction that is contributing to suction seal loss is essential in determining the correct location to perform the remplissage procedure. The strength of this seal differs with the position of the joint, increasing in external rotation and decreasing in flexion with internal rotation.1 If the graft is placed in the incorrect area of the femoral head-neck junction, cam-type impingement symptoms may occur. When considering this procedure, it is important to keep in mind that some patients may present with an over-resection so severe that a remplissage with soft tissue may not be sufficient to fill the defect (Table 2).
Table 2.
Advantages |
|
|
|
Limitations |
|
|
|
Hip arthroscopy is considered to be a technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve.17 The application of reconstruction to two different joint regions (the labrum and the femoral head−neck junction) in the same session, and the need for 3-dimensional analysis of target areas with dynamic examination further increases the difficulty of the technique. Surgeons early in their learning curve should pay special attention to the pearls and pitfalls (Table 1) and advantages and limitations (Table 2) when performing this technique to treat patients with an over-resected cam deformity with a degenerative labrum.
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: S.J.N. reports other from AlloSource, Arthrex, Athletico, DJ Orthopaedics, Linvatec, Miomed, Ossur, and Smith & Nephew, personal fees from Springer, and personal fees and other from Stryker, outside the submitted work; and board or committee member, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America. J.C. reports other from Arthrex, CONMED Linvatec, Ossur, and Smith & Nephew, outside the submitted work; and board or committee member, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America, International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery, and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Dwyer M.K., Jones H.L., Hogan M.G., Field R.E., McCarthy J.C., Noble P.C. The acetabular labrum regulates fluid circulation of the hip joint during functional activities. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:812–819. doi: 10.1177/0363546514522395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cadet E.R., Chan A.K., Vorys G.C., Gardner T., Yin B. Investigation of the preservation of the fluid seal effect in the repaired, partially resected, and reconstructed acetabular labrum in a cadaveric hip model. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2218–2223. doi: 10.1177/0363546512457645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suppauksorn S., Beck E.C., Chahla J., et al. Comparison of suction seal and contact pressures between 270 degrees labral reconstruction, labral repair, and the intact labrum. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:2433–2442. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crawford M.J., Dy C.J., Alexander J.W., et al. The 2007 Frank Stinchfield Award. The biomechanics of the hip labrum and the stability of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:16–22. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815b181f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fagotti L., Kemler B.R., Utsunomiya H., et al. Effects of capsular reconstruction with an iliotibial band allograft on distractive stability of the hip joint: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:3429–3436. doi: 10.1177/0363546518802841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nepple J.J., Philippon M.J., Campbell K.J., et al. The hip fluid seal—Part II: The effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, and reconstruction on hip stability to distraction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:730–736. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2875-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ganz R., Parvizi J., Beck M., Leunig M., Notzli H., Siebenrock K.A. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003:112–120. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Notzli H.P., Wyss T.F., Stoecklin C.H., Schmid M.R., Treiber K., Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b4.12014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cvetanovich G.L., Harris J.D., Erickson B.J., Bach B.R., Jr., Bush-Joseph C.A., Nho S.J. Revision hip arthroscopy: A systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1382–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Malviya A., Raza A., Jameson S., James P., Reed M.R., Partington P.F. Complications and survival analyses of hip arthroscopies performed in the national health service in England: A review of 6,395 cases. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:836–842. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shapira J., Kyin C., Go C., et al. Indications and outcomes of secondary hip procedures after failed hip arthroscopy: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:1992–2007. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vaughn Z.D., Safran M.R. Arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty/chielectomy for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010;18:90–99. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181dfce63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Frank J.M., Chahla J., Mitchell J.J., Soares E., Philippon M.J. Remplissage of the femoral head-neck junction in revision hip arthroscopy: A technique to correct excessive cam resection. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1209–e1213. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mansor Y., Perets I., Close M.R., Mu B.H., Domb B.G. In search of the spherical femoroplasty: Cam overresection leads to inferior functional scores before and after revision hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:2061–2071. doi: 10.1177/0363546518779064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Philippon M.J., Nepple J.J., Campbell K.J., et al. The hip fluid seal—Part I: The effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, and reconstruction on hip fluid pressurization. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:722–729. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2874-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bhatia S., Chahla J., Dean C.S., Ellman M.B. Hip labral reconstruction: The "kite technique" for improved efficiency and graft control. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e337–e342. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoppe D.J., de Sa D., Simunovic N., et al. The learning curve for hip arthroscopy: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:389–397. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.