Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Urology logoLink to Asian Journal of Urology
letter
. 2020 Aug 22;8(3):335–336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.08.002

Testing for BRCA1/2 and ataxiatelangiectasia mutated in men with high prostate indices: An approach to reducing prostate cancer mortality in Asia and Africa

Jude Ogechukwu Okoye 1
PMCID: PMC8356039  PMID: 34401341

Dear Editor,

A recently published review article titled “Current progress and questions in germline genetic of prostate cancer” enumerated some pertinent questions which impact on prostate cancer (PCa) surveillance and management [1]. Literature across the world reveals that the age-standardized incidence rate per 100 000 of PCa is lower in Asia (11.5) and Africa (26.6) when compared with Latin America/Caribbean (56.4), Europe (62.1) and Oceania (79.1); surprisingly the mortality rate per new case is higher in Africa (52.2%) and Asia (39.8%) when compared with Europe (23.9%), Oceania (19.1%), and Latin America/Caribbean (16.8%) [2]. Globally, screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an approach aimed at identifying PCa at its early stages. However, early identification of individuals at risk of developing aggressive/lethal PCa remains a challenge among clinicians. A follow-up study carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland showed that 4.3% and 5.8% of those carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations developed PCa with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2.4 and 4.5, respectively [3]. However, the study was not explicit on whether the patients developed lethal or indolent PCa. Another study carried out in the UK revealed that after 3 years of active histological follow-up, 5.2%, 3.4%, 3.0%, and 2.7% of BRCA2 carriers, BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 non-carriers, and BRCA1 non-carriers developed aggressive PCa, respectively [4]. Nyberg et al. [3] observed that those with a positive family history have SIR of 3.2 and 7.3 for BRCA1 and BRCA2 while those with a negative family history have SIR of 2.3 and 3.9 for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. In the United State (US), a 26 years follow-up exercise revealed that 13.0% of actively monitored men developed PCa, out of which 13.9% developed aggressive PCa [5]. Evidence showed that the frequency of pathogenic mutations was higher in patients with aggressive PCa (6.1%) than in patients with localized PCa (1.4%) [6]. The frequency of BRCA1, BRCA2, and ataxiatelangiectasia mutated (ATM) were higher in aggressive PCa (0.6%, 3.5%, and 1.9%) than in localized PCa (0.4%, 0.8%, and 0.4%, respectively). This suggests that apart from BRCA2 mutation, BRCA1 mutation and ATM play critical roles in the development of aggressive carcinogenesis. However, the extent to which the germline mutations drive carcinogenesis differs with race and across continents. Na et al. [6] showed that carrier rates of pathogenic mutations of BRCA1/2, ATM, and DNA repair genes (DRGs) are higher in Chinese (0.0%/13.6%, 4.6%, and 18.2%) than in Caucasians (0.8%/3.1%, 1.5%, and 5.4%) and African American (0.0%/0.0%, 3.3%, and 3.3%, respectively). Chandrasekar et al. [7] observed that the prevalences of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), and hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) were higher in African American than in Caucasians while the prevalences of Lynch syndrome (LS) was higher in African American than in Caucasians, with differences of 7.2%, 4.2%, 1.2% and 3.5%, respectively. They observed that the prevalence of HCS, HBOC, and LS connected to family history were higher in African American than in Caucasians with a difference of 12.6%, 15.6%, and 15.6%, respectively. From their study, the prevalences of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were higher in African American (14.3% and 3.6%, respectively) than in Caucasians (5.0% and 3.5%, respectively) while the prevalence of ATM was higher in Caucasians (0.7%) than in African American (0.0%).

The increasing mortality rate among PCa patients has resulted in a robust search for reliable prostate indices to identify individuals at high-risk of developing lethal, aggressive or metastatic PCa. Some of the prostate indices are Gleason score (GS), prostate volume, PSA density and level, and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression. Evidence showed that patients with prostate volume <60 g were more likely to have high-risk PCa (Gleason grade group >4) [8] while PSA density of >2.0 ng/mL had the best complementary sensitivity and specificity to predict pathological adverse disease [9]. Paschalis et al. [10] stated that the frequency of PSA level >3.0 ng/mL was higher in BRCA2 carriers than in BRCA2 non-carriers (7.5% versus 5.8%, respectively) [4]. Similarly, high expression of membranous PSMA, driven by increased demand for folate and glutamate, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa was associated with BRCA2 mutation. An earlier study revealed that germline mutation carriers had a significant higher frequency of GS≥7 and higher median PSA levels (71%; 7.90 ng/mL) than their non-carriers counterparts (31%; 6.20 ng/mL) [6]. Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, patients with GS≥7 had higher SIR (5.1) than patients with GS≤6 (3.0) [3]. Higher frequency of mutation carrier rate in patients with aggressive PCa was associated with lower age of death (≤70 years) and shorter survival time [6]. Taken together, these findings suggest that germline mutation in BRCA2 gene remains a strong predictor of aggressive PCa and poor survival outcome. Extensive study of germline mutations has been carried out in African American, Caucasians, Hispanics and Asians, especially those with aggressive PCa; sadly there is a paucity of data on the prevalence of the mutations in African men. To avoid overdiagnosis, men (≤70 years) with a family history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancers or LS should be tested for abnormal PSA level to aid early detection of PCa. To reduce PCa related mortality in Asia and Africa, men with reduced prostate volume, high PSA density and levels, and high PSMA expression should be tested for germline mutations in DRGs.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Isaac W.B., Xu J. Current progress and questions in germline genetic of prostate cancer. Asian J Urol. 2019;6:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Culp M.B., Soerjomataram I., Efstathiou J.A., Bray F., Jemal A. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Eur Urol. 2020;77:38–52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nyberg T., Frost D., Barrowdale D., Evans D.G., Bancroft E., Adlard J. Prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020;77:24–25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Page E.C., Bancroft E.K., Brook M.N., Assei M., Battat M.H.A., Thomas S. Interim results from the IMPACT study: evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Eur Urol. 2019;76:831–842. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pernar C.H., Ebot E.M., Petterson A., Graff R.E., Giunchi F., Ahearn T.U. A prospective study of the association between physical activity and risk of prostate cancer defined by clinical features and TMPRSS:ERG. Eur Urol. 2019;76:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Na R., Zheng S.L., Han M., Yu H., Jiang D., Shah S. Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 distinguish risk for lethal and indolent prostate cancer and are associated with early age at death. Eur Urol. 2017;71:740–747. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chandrasekar T., Gross L., Gomella L.G., Hegarty S.E., Leong J.Y., Giri V.N. Prevalence of suspected hereditary cancer syndromes and germline mutations among a diverse cohort of probands reporting a family history of prostate cancer: toward informing cascade testing for men. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buie J., De Riese W., Sharma P. Smaller prostate volume is associated with adverse pathological features and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urol Sci. 2019;30:255–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsang C.F., Lai T.C.T., Lam W., Ho B.S.H., Ng A.T.I., Ma W.K. Is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density necessary in selecting prostate cancer patients for active surveillance and what should be the cutoff in the Asian population? Prostate Int. 2019;7:73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Paschalis A., Sheehan B., Riisnaes R., Roddrigues D.N., Gurel B., Bertan C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and DNA repair defects in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:469–478. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Journal of Urology are provided here courtesy of Second Military Medical University

RESOURCES