Abstract
Background
Age is a risk factor for COVID severity. Most studies performed in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV2 infection have shown an over-representation of older patients and consequently few have properly defined COVID-19 in younger patients who require hospital admission. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors for the development of respiratory failure among young (18 to 50 years) hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Methods
This retrospective nationwide cohort study included hospitalized patients from 18 to 50 years old with confirmed COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and July 2, 2020. All patient data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID Registry. Respiratory failure was defined as the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) ≤200 mmHg or the need for mechanical ventilation and/or high-flow nasal cannula or the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Results
During the recruitment period, 15,034 patients were included in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, of whom 2327 (15.4%) were younger than 50 years. Respiratory failure developed in 343 (14.7%), while mortality occurred in 2.3%. Patients with respiratory failure showed a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (44 (13%) vs 14 (0.8%), p<0.001), venous thrombosis (23 (6.7%) vs 14 (0.8%), p<0.001), mortality (43 (12.5%) vs 7 (0.4%), p<0.001), and longer hospital stay (15 (9–24) vs 6 (4–9), p<0.001), than the remaining patients. In multivariate analysis, variables associated with the development of respiratory failure were obesity (odds ratio (OR), 2.42; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.71 to 3.43; p<0.0001), alcohol abuse (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.58; p=0.0076), sleep apnea syndrome (SAHS) (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.43; p=0.032), Charlson index ≥1 (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.52; p=0.0013), fever (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.22; p=0.0075), lymphocytes ≤1100 cells/μL (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.37; p=0.0033), LDH >320 U/I (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.42; p=0.0039), AST >35 mg/dL (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.52; p=0.003), sodium <135 mmol/L (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.33; p=0.0079), and C-reactive protein >8 mg/dL (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.72 to 3.41; p<0.0001).
Conclusions
Young patients with COVID-19 requiring hospital admission showed a notable incidence of respiratory failure. Obesity, SAHS, alcohol abuse, and certain laboratory parameters were independently associated with the development of this complication. Patients who suffered respiratory failure had a higher mortality and a higher incidence of major cardiac events, venous thrombosis, and hospital stay.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07066-z.
KEY WORDS: SARS-CoV2, COVID-19, young, respiratory failure, obesity, hyponatremia
INTRODUCTION
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread around the world. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to be wide, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness, and severe pneumonia with respiratory failure and death.1,2 COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in the USA in 2020 in persons aged 45 through 84 years.3 Most studies have identified advanced age, male gender, presence of comorbidity,4–6 and a number of laboratory parameters, including D-dimers, lymphocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), as independent risk factors for mortality and need for mechanical ventilation1,7–14 in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Respiratory failure and death have been found to be associated with age and age-associated risk factors but it is still present in younger populations; therefore, we need to investigate if the risk factors change based on age.15–18
The current life expectancy in Spain is 83.2 years19 and similar figures can be found in many other Western countries and Japan. The median age of patients included in the SEMI-COVID Registry, for example, is 69.1 years,20 and similar values could be observed in other large series.1,21–23 Meanwhile, younger patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization are scarce in large series, and their clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes may have been obscured or missed when analyzing these cohorts.24 At the same time, other risk factors often associated with a poor outcome in COVID-19 patients, such as dementia or cardiovascular disease, are highly associated with aging, but do not necessarily play a significant role in the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in younger patients.1,2,21–23,25,26 For this reason, we selected a younger population (18 to 50 years) with COVID-19 who required hospital admission27,28 in order to analyze their clinical characteristics and risk factors for the development of respiratory failure and outcome.
METHODS
Study Population and Design
This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients aged between 18 and 50 years old with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection who were hospitalized in Spanish hospitals between March 1, 2020, and July 2, 2020. All patient data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, with 150 participating hospitals, which is coordinated by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. The SEMI-COVID-19 Registry is an ongoing, multicenter, observational, nationwide cohort of consecutive 18 and older patients requiring hospitalization in Spanish hospitals for microbiologically confirmed COVID-19. The main objective is to obtain detailed information on the epidemiology, clinical progress, and treatment received by patients with COVID-19 in real-world clinical practice at admission and during hospitalization.
The STROBE Statement guidelines were followed in the conduct and reporting of the study.
Ethical Approval
The study was defined as observational by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Products (AEMPS, in its initials in Spanish), in accordance with the applicable regulations. The SEMI-COVID-19 Registry was initially approved by the Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga (Spain). The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committees of each participating hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment. When there were biosafety concerns and/or the patient had already been discharged, verbal informed consent was requested and noted on the medical record.
Data Collection
All data were extracted from electronical medical records using a standardized electronic data capture system. A database manager ensured data consistency verification. The database platform is hosted on a secure server. Patient identification is encrypted and anonymized. Information includes sociodemographic variables and previous medical history, first available vital signs, respiratory status, laboratory and radiology data at admission and complications during hospital admission, and clinical situation on day +30 of the evolution of the illness. Patients were managed according to local criteria, although national recommendations provided by the Spanish Ministry of Health guided clinical management, treatment, and discharge criteria.29 Laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 was by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) on nasal/nasopharyngeal exudate.
Endpoint Definitions
The primary endpoint was the presence of respiratory failure during hospital admission. Respiratory failure was defined as the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) ≤200 mmHg30 or the need for mechanical ventilation (either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation—continuous (CPAP) or bilevel positive pressure ventilation—or invasive mechanical ventilation) and/or high-flow nasal cannula or the presence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The use of baseline CPAP is not a criterion for ventilatory failure unless there is respiratory impairment according to the definition used. If PaO2 was not available, an estimated PaO2/FiO2 (ePaO2/FiO2) ratio was calculated, using pulse oximetry saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2 ratio) and applying the formula SpO2/FiO2 = 64 + 0.84 × PaO2/FiO2.31 In-hospital mortality during the 30-day follow-up was recorded.
Statistical Methods
Quantitative variables were described using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) or means ± standard deviation (SD), and compared by Student’s t-test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, taking into account whether the variance was equal or unequal. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test all parameters for normality of distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies and compared by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. The LOESS smoothing function was applied to plot the probability of respiratory failure of the quantitative variables (Supplementary Figure 2).
Univariate analysis was performed to establish the relationship of variables with the development of respiratory failure. Associations were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Adjusted p values for multiple comparisons were obtained using the Benjamini and Hochberg method.32 The complete list of variables analyzed for respiratory failure is shown in Supplementary Table 1. A multivariate logistic regression model was then developed to identify independent predictive variable for the risk of respiratory failure. In order to explore the importance of certain clinical and analytical data, two multivariate analyses were performed: one with variables available in at least 90% of the population, and another with all recorded variables. In the second one, we decided to include a greater number of prognostic variables (such as ferritin or albumin), in accordance with previously published data, although these were collected from a smaller number of patients.
Discrimination of the final models was measured using the C-Index (ROC area), and predictive ability was determined with the Brier score and Nagelkerke’s R2. All statistical tests were 2-tailed and the threshold of statistical significance was p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with computer software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Cutoff values for laboratory parameters were determined by MedCalc Version 19.2.0.
RESULTS
Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients at Admission
During the recruitment period, 15,034 patients were included in the SEMI-COVID Registry, of which 2327 were younger than 50 years old (Supplementary Figure 1). The median age was 42.2 years (IQR: 36–46.7) and 59.5% of patients were male. A total of 9.4% were healthcare workers. Most of them were Caucasian race (67.9%), followed by those of Hispanic ethnicity (27.8%). The most frequent previous medical conditions were obesity (defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2) (21.6%), hypertension (13%), asthma (9.7%), and diabetes (5.5%). The main demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The median time from onset of symptoms to the first positive rRT-PCR was 7 days (IQR: 4 to 9) and was less than 5 days in only 515 patients (23.9%). At admission, the initial chest X-ray showed abnormal findings in 2066 cases (90.1%). Significant differences in most laboratory parameters were observed at admission between those who developed respiratory failure and those who did not, as shown in Table 2. Extended data of Tables 1 and 2 are available in the Supplementary File.
Table 1.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population (n=2327)
| Variable | Total (n = 2327) | Respiratory failure (n=343) | Without respiratory failure (n=1984) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline characteristics | ||||
| Age (years) | 42.2 (36–46.7) | 43.3 (38.4–46.9) | 42 (35.8–46.7) | 0.04 |
| Sex (male) | 1373 (59.5%) | 200 (70.2%) | 1173 (58%) | 0.01 |
| Charlson ≥1 | 522 (24.3%) | 104 (31.3%) | 418 (23%) | 0.001 |
| Hispanic ethnicity (vs. others) | 598 (27.8%) | 111 (33.1%) | 487 (26.8%) | 0.019 |
| Caucasian ethnicity (vs. others) | 1460 (67.9%) | 210 (62.7%) | 1250 (68.9%) | 0.025 |
| Alcohol abuse | 70 (3.3%) | 22 (6.6%) | 48 (2.6%) | <0.0001 |
| Obesity | 439 (21.6%) | 119 (37.4%) | 320 (18.7%) | <0.0001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 120 (5.5%) | 34 (9.9%) | 86 (4.7%) | <0.0001 |
| Hypertension | 285 (13%) | 58 (16.9%) | 227 (12.2%) | 0.018 |
| Previous use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor | 119 (5.4%) | 19 (5.5%) | 100 (5.4%) | 0.91 |
| Previous use of angiotensin II receptor blocker | 106 (4.8%) | 19 (5.5%) | 87 (4.7%) | 0.51 |
| Asthma | 212 (9.7%) | 41 (12%) | 171 (9.2%) | 0.119 |
| Sleep apnea syndrome | 63 (2.9%) | 22 (6.4%) | 41 (2.2%) | <0.0001 |
| Chronic liver disease | 343 (2%) | 14 (4.1%) | 329 (1.6%) | 0.002 |
| Malignancy* | 88 (4%) | 18 (5.3%) | 70 (3.8%) | 0.194 |
| Pregnancy | 68 (3.1%) | 5 (1.5%) | 63 (3.4%) | 0.057 |
| Previous use of steroids | 59 (2.7%) | 8 (2.3%) | 51 (2.8%) | 0.658 |
| Anticoagulants | 25(1.1%) | 3 (0.9%) | 22 (1.1%) | 0.786 |
| Clinical findings at admission | ||||
| Temperature (°C) | 37.2 (36.5–38) | 37.7 (36.9–38.4) | 37.1 (36.5–38) | <0.0001 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 121 (110–133) | 121 (110–134) | 121 (110–133) | 0.495 |
| Heart rate (beats per min) | 94 (81–106) | 99 (87–11) | 93 (80–105) | <0.0001 |
| >20 breaths per min | 481 (21.3%) | 179 (53.1%) | 740 (40.7%) | <0.0001 |
| Rales | 919 (42.7%) | 179 (53.1%) | 740 (40.7%) | <0.0001 |
| Wheezing | 86 (4%) | 24 (7.1%) | 62 (3.4%) | 0.001 |
| Rhonchus | 105 (4.9%) | 31 (9.3%) | 74 (4.1%) | <0.0001 |
| Altered consciousness | 51 (2.3%) | 19 (5.6%) | 32 (1.7%) | <0.0001 |
| Dyspnea | 1264 (57.7%) | 260 (76.2%) | 1004 (54.3%) | <0.0001 |
| Ageusia | 251 (11.7%) | 25 (7.4%) | 226 (12.5%) | 0.008 |
| Anosmia | 251 (11.7%) | 27 (8%) | 224 (12.4%) | 0.022 |
| Radiological findings | ||||
| Abnormal initial chest X-ray | 1967 (90%) | 329 (95.9%) | 1638 (88.9%) | <0.0001 |
Data are presented as medians (IQR) or as absolute values (percentages). Bold characters indicate p < 0.05. *Malignancy includes hematologic malignancies and solid organ tumors
Table 2.
Laboratory Findings at Admission According to the Development of Respiratory Failure
| Variable | Total (n = 2327) | Respiratory failure (n=343) | Without respiratory failure (n=1984) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory findings at admission | ||||
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 72 (61–86) | 66 (55–79) | 73 (63–88) | <0.0001 |
| PaO2 <60 mmHg | 191 (21.5%) | 72 (32.7%) | 119 (17.8%) | <0.0001 |
| SpO2 (%) | 96 (94–98) | 91 (85–94) | 96 (94–98) | <0.0001 |
| ePAFI ratio | 319 (257–390) | 257 (187–327) | 338 (285–404) | <0.0001 |
| Leukocytes (×103 cells/μL) | 5.77 (4.44–7.6) | 7.1 (5–9.8) | 5.7 (4.5–7.7) | <0.0001 |
| Lymphocytes (×103 cells/μL) | 1.1 (0.8–1.5) | 0.9 (0.67–1.28) | 1.21 (0.81–1.51) | <0.0001 |
| Monocytes (×103 cells/μL) | 0.4 (0.28–0.56) | 0.37 (0.25–0.5) | 0.4 (0.28–0.56) | <0.0001 |
| Laboratory values at admission and/or within the first 24 h of hospitalization | ||||
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 1.4 (1–2.11) | 2.04 (1–15) | 1.35 (0.8–3.05) | 0.210 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.82 (0.68–0.99) | 0.89 (0.71–1.03) | 0.81 (0.67–0.97) | <0.0001 |
| Ferritin levels (ng/mL) | 497 (182–1127) | 1091 (312–1716) | 393 (103–810) | <0.0001 |
| LDH (U/L) | 290 (224–385) | 355 (269–604) | 309 (235–428) | <0.0001 |
| AST (mg/dL) | 35 (25–52) | 44 (33–53) | 30 (22–42) | <0.0001 |
| ALT (mg/dL) | 34 (22–56) | 42 (26–67) | 33 (22–54) | <0.0001 |
| Albumin (mg/dL) | 4.1 (3.7–4.3) | 3.7 (3.3–3.8) | 4.1 (3.8–4.3) | <0.0001 |
| Creatine kinase (U/L) | 91 (57–172) | 410 (258–430) | 69 (59–84) | <0.0001 |
| Sodium(mmol/L) | 138 (135–140) | 136 (134–139) | 136 (137–140) | <0.0001 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dL) | 3.63 (1.20–9.01) | 5.06 (3.17–16.1) | 4.2 (2.1–7.15) | <0.0001 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.07 (0.04–0.14) | 0.14 (0.1–1.14) | 0.06 (0.02–0.07) | <0.0001 |
| Fibrinogen levels (mg/dL) | 593 (494–711) | 517 (469–742) | 605 (268–656) | 0.001 |
| D-dimer (mg/mL) | 440 (260–715) | 566 (323–888) | 412 (250–693) | <0.0001 |
| Interleukin-6 (pg/mL) | 19 (7.9–48.8) | 71 (24–149) | 15.8 (7.2–35.1) | <0.0001 |
Data are presented as no. (%) or medians (IQR). Bold characters indicate p values <0.05. BP, blood pressure; paO2, partial pressure of oxygen; SpO2, peripheral pulse oximetry; ePAFI, estimated pulse oximetry saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen (SpO2/FiO2) ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase. All laboratory values were available in >90% of cases except PaO2 (n=911); lactate (n=926); creatine kinase (n=1220); procalcitonin (n=1033); fibrinogen levels (n=1524); D-dimer (n=1786); ferritin (n=890); interleukin-6 (n=338); albumin (n=1013); LDH (n=2054); and GOT (n=1916)
Management and Outcome
In the course of hospitalization, antibiotics were given in 1976 patients (84.9%), with azithromycin being used in 1381 cases (59.3%). Hydroxychloroquine was prescribed in 2058 (88.8%), lopinavir/ritonavir in 1605 (69%), corticosteroids 507 (21.8%), interferon-β1b in 240 (10.3%), tocilizumab in 215 (9.2%), and remdesivir in 21 (0.9%) patients, respectively.
Respiratory failure was the most common complication (14.7%). ICU admission occurred in 180 patients (8.2%) and 172 of these belonged to the respiratory failure group (50.3% vs 0.4%, p<0.0001). As Table 3 shows, the frequency of complications and in-hospital stay was significantly increased in the respiratory failure group when compared with those patients who did not develop respiratory failure. Overall mortality was 2.3% (50/2327), with a significant difference between groups according to development of respiratory failure (12.5% (43/343) vs 0.4% (7/1984), p<0.0001). Thirty-seven patients (1.7%) suffered a venous thrombosis, with a significative difference between those who suffered respiratory failure (6.7% (23/343) vs 0.8% (14/1984), p<0.001). MACE events occurred in 2.7% (58/2327) and were more frequent in respiratory failure patients (13% (44/343) vs 0.8% (14/1984), p<0.00). Hospital stay was 7 (5–10) days longer in the respiratory failure group (15 (9–24) vs 6 (4–9) days, p<0.001).
Table 3.
Complications and Relevant Outcomes
| Variable | Total (n = 2327) | Respiratory failure (n=343) | Without respiratory failure (n=1984) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sepsis | 50 (2.3%) | 45 (13.1%) | 5 (0.3%) |
| Acute multiorgan failure | 27 (1.2%) | 25 (7.3%) | 2 (0.1%) |
| Secondary lung infection | 137 (6.2%) | 65 (19%) | 72 (3.9%) |
| ICU admission | 180 (8.2%) | 172 (50.3%) | 8 (0.4%) |
| Length of ICU stay (days) | 11 (6–17) | 11 (7–17) | 3 (2–5) |
| Acute kidney injury | 79 (3.6%) | 42 (12.2%) | 37 (2%) |
| Disseminated intravascular coagulation | 10 (0.5%) | 7 (2%) | 3 (0.2%) |
| Venous thrombosis | 37 (1.7%) | 23 (6.7%) | 14 (0.8%) |
| MACE event | 58 (2.7%) | 44 (13%) | 14 (0.8%) |
| Time from admission to discharge/exitus (days) | 7 (5–10) | 15 (9–24) | 6 (4–9) |
| Overall in-hospital mortality | 50 (2.3%) | 43 (12.5%) | 7 (0.4%) |
Data are presented as no. (%) or medians (IQR). Bold characters indicate p values <0.05. ICU, intensive care unit; MACE, major adverse cardiac events. All p values were <0.001
Analysis and Risk Estimation of Respiratory Failure
In the respiratory failure group, 37.9% (130/343) of patients were treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for a median duration of 10 days (IQR: 7–15), whereas 62 (18.1%) and 138 (40.2%) patients were managed with noninvasive mechanical ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula, respectively. The prone position was used in 40.2% (138/343) patients. Patients with ARDS at different levels of severity received some of the therapies mentioned above. Of the total of 2327 patients, a total of 259 (11.1%) patients suffered moderate (102 (4.4%)) or severe ARDS (157 (6.7%)) at admission.
Table 4 and Figure 1 summarize the univariate and multivariate analyses of parameters predicting respiratory failure. An extended univariate analysis is provided in Supplementary Table 4. LOESS smoothing curve plots of the probability of respiratory failure against quantitative variables included in the univariate analysis are shown in Supplementary Figure 2.
Table 4.
Univariate Analysis of Respiratory Failure
| Univariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | p value* |
| Age (years)† | 1.02 (1.01–1.04) | 0.032 |
| Sex (male) | 1.69 (1.31–2.16) | 0.0018 |
| Charlson ≥1 | 1.52 (1.18–1.93) | 0.017 |
| Hispanic ethnicity (vs. others) | 1.35 (1.05–1.73) | 0.189 |
| Alcohol abuse | 2.6 (1.55–4.37) | 0.0018 |
| Obesity | 2.6 (2.01–3.36) | 0.0018 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2.25 (1.48–3.41) | 0.0018 |
| Sleep apnea syndrome | 3.01 (1.77–5.12) | 0.0018 |
| Asthma | 1.33 (0.92–1.91) | 0.36 |
| Fever (temperature ≥38°C) | 2.01 (1.58–2.57) | 0.0018 |
| Heart rate >85 beats per min | 1.96 (1.48–2.59) | 0.0018 |
| >20 breaths per min | 4.53 (3.54–5.79) | 0.0018 |
| Altered consciousness | 3.34 (1.87–5.97) | 0.0018 |
| qSOFA≥2 | 5.29 (3.21–8.73) | 0.0018 |
| Dyspnea | 2.71 (2.07–3.53) | 0.0018 |
| Abnormal chest X-ray | 2.94 (1.69–5.12) | 0.0018 |
| Leukocytes > 6×103 cells/μl | 2.05 (1.62–2.59) | 0.0018 |
| Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio | 1.06 (1.04–1.08) | 0.0018 |
| Lymphocytes ≤1100 cells/μl | 1.96 (1.54–2.5) | 0.0018 |
| Ferritin >1200 ng/mL | 4.64 (3.14–6.86) | 0.0018 |
| LDH >320 U/I | 3.25 (2.51–4.2) | 0.0018 |
| AST >35 mg/dL | 2.59 (1.97–3.4) | 0.0018 |
| Albumin ≤3.7mg/dL | 2.96 (2.09–4.18) | 0.0018 |
| Creatine kinase >80 U/L | 2.27 (1.63–3.16) | 0.0018 |
| Sodium <135 mmol/L | 2.9 (2.23–3.78) | 0.0018 |
| C-reactive protein >8 mg/dL | 3.75 (2.94–4.79) | 0.0018 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL)† | 1.09 (1.01–1.19) | 0.189 |
| D-dimer >500 mg/mL | 1.9 (1.46–2.46) | 0.0018 |
| Interleukin-6 >50 pg/mL | 8.1 (4.43–14.81) | 0.0018 |
Bold characters indicate p < 0.05. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. *p adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. †Odds ratio per unitary increment
Fig. 1.
Risk factors for respiratory failure with multivariate analysis. A Risk factors for respiratory failure with multivariate analysis (model 1). B Risk factors for respiratory failure with multivariate analysis (model 2).
Finally, a reduced model identifying respiratory failure was generated. Ten variables remained independently associated with the primary endpoint: obesity, alcohol abuse, sleep apnea syndrome, Charlson index ≥1, fever (temperature ≥38°C), lymphocytes ≤1100 cells/μL, LDH >320 U/I, AST >35 mg/dL, sodium <135 mmol/L, and C-reactive protein (CRP) >8 mg/dL. Their corresponding odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals are shown in Figure 1A. This reduced model provided good discriminatory ability (bootstrap-corrected C-index 0.779 (CI 95%: 0.757–0.800) and goodness-of-fit (Hosmer and Lemeshow p = 0.36).
At the same time, in a second analysis, we performed another predictive model giving priority to the inclusion of a greater number of possible analytical variables in order to explore the influence of ferritin and albumin, although this approach meant a significant loss of patients. In this second model, seven variables remained independently associated with the presence of respiratory failure (obesity, leukocytes > 6×103 cells/μL, lymphocytes ≤1100 cells/μL, ferritin >1200 ng/mL, albumin ≤3.7mg/dL, sodium <135 mmol/L, and CRP >8 mg/dL). Some of these differed from the original more inclusive model, as Figure 1B shows. This second multivariate model provided better discriminatory ability (bootstrap-corrected C-index 0.84 (95% CI: 0.809–0.874) and goodness-of-fit (Hosmer and Lemeshow p = 0.81).
DISCUSSION
The primary goal in conducting this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of young people (18–50 years) hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and the risk factors for the development of respiratory failure. To do this, we analyzed the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry in which 150 Spanish hospitals participated. The first clinically relevant finding is that 15% of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital were under 50 years of age. The strength of our study is that it is a real-life multicenter study with a large number of patients, a total of 2327 hospitalized young patients, which is to the best of our knowledge the largest report on this subgroup of COVID-19 patients.
Second, it provides insights into the evolution and prognosis of COVID-19 in patients who are younger than those generally enrolled in clinical studies. As a result, we have been able to analyze specific risk factors in this subgroup of patients without the interference of frailty or aging-associated comorbidities and to show the importance of obesity and a few laboratory parameters for making an early evaluation of the possible development of respiratory failure, which is the main cause of SARS-CoV2-related death.
The third major conclusion is that this younger population is not exempt from serious complications, since respiratory failure, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality were found in 14.7%, 8.2%, and 2.3% of patients, respectively. This mortality rate is similar to that described by other authors.33
The fourth major finding is that young patients with respiratory failure present more medical complications, as other studies have highlighted.16,18,24,34 There was a notable presence of acute kidney injury, venous thrombosis, and, especially, the development of MACE events. Hence, early identification of patients at potential risk of complications is essential to ensure adequate management.
The fifth conclusion is that comorbidity, obesity, alcohol abuse, and sleep apnea syndrome, as well as the presence of fever, were independent predictors of respiratory failure, which is consistent with previous publications,4,5,10,18 and lymphocytes, LDH, AST, sodium, and CRP were predictors of poor prognosis, as other studies have also pointed out.5,7,10,16,18
We decided to use respiratory failure as the main endpoint because, in the vast majority of COVID-19 patients, mortality is related to the presence of respiratory failure.35 We defined it in broader terms than invasive mechanical ventilation or ICU admission in order to obtain a more realistic view of the demands of the first wave of the pandemic in terms of healthcare pressure. This approach continues to be valid, given that the pandemic is currently global. If we focus on patients who developed respiratory failure, we observe that half the cases required ICU admission, while the other 50% was managed with non-invasive ventilatory support. Likewise, we observed that the presence of respiratory failure was more frequent in men, with a slight predominance of Hispanic ethnicity and subjects with previous comorbidities, highlighting the presence of sleep apnea syndrome and previous alcohol consumption. However, the most notable differences were observed in the predictive parameters, even at the time of hospital admission, which presented important predictive values for the development of respiratory failure (Fig. 1A and B). Analytical variables were treated as continuous variables and categorized using ROC curves (Supplementary Table 2) to facilitate their management in the risk factor analysis. Although most of the analytical variables were collected in more than 90% of the subjects, a few other relevant variables were accessible in a smaller number of patients, so making them difficult to use in potential predictive models. This was the case of TnT, CPK, ferritin, albumin, prothrombin ratio, and interleukin-6 (IL-6). To deal with this, we created the first multivariate model (Fig. 1A), which included the largest possible number of patients (n = 1457). In order to analyze other widely reported prognostic variables such as ferritin and albumin,1,9,36 we constructed a second model (Fig. 1B), which included a larger number of analytical variables, although at the expense of reducing the number of patients (the final model included 503 patients). Following this approach, the only clinical variable that remained in the model was obesity. All the analytical variables in model 1 were retained, and leukocytes, ferritin, and albumin were added as prognostic markers. This second model has an accessible analysis and offers high prognostic value (AUC of 0.85) for predicting the development of respiratory failure. In both models (1 and 2 in Fig. 1), the presence of lymphocytes ≤ 1100 cells/μL, obesity, sodium < 135 mmol/L, and C-reactive protein >8 mg/dL remain independent risk factors. In the first model (which includes a larger number of cases), we would also add albumin ≤ 3.7 mg/dL, ferritin >1200 ng/mL, and leukocytes > 6×103 cells/μL. In the second model, which includes a smaller number of patients but more analytical variables, alcohol abuse, sleep apnea syndrome, Charlson index ≥ 1, LDH > 320 U/L, fever (≥ 38°C), and AST > 35 mg/dL were also additional risk factors.
These findings highlight a case analysis at admission which include those variables that allow us to identify populations at risk for the development of respiratory failure in order to increase predictive power, which would allow for optimization of the necessary care resources.
Unfortunately, the main limitation of our study is that it is a real-life registry so that, despite the inclusion of a large number of patients, some of the potential prognostic values indicated in the univariate study of biochemistry parameters, such as IL-6, lactate, and troponin, could not be confirmed in the multivariate study. These biomarkers were obtained in 338, 926, and 294 cases, respectively.
The results of this study suggest that the risk factors for poor outcome in younger patients may be different from those in older one. To confirm this observation, a study comparing the two groups directly should be performed.37
Unfortunately, our work has other limitations. First the outcomes in March–July 2020 were different than now, with more consistent use of anticoagulation (prophylactic or therapeutic when appropriate) and corticosteroids; thus, it may be hard to extrapolate or predict how similar patients would do now.
Second, the laboratory variables are dichotomized. The relationship between laboratory variables and outcomes are unlikely to be dichotomous or even linear; thus, these relationships are overly simplified.
Third, this study has been carried out in a single country in southern Europe, but we consider that it would be very appropriate to know whether the results are extrapolable to other regions of the world with different socio-demographic characteristics to ours.
In conclusion, a significant percentage of younger patients (18–50 years old) with COVID-19 requiring hospital admission presented respiratory failure, particularly those who were obese or had SAHS. This serious complication can be identified at admission by the usual laboratory tests.
Supplementary Information
(DOCX 476 kb)
(PDF 190 kb)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge all the healthcare workers involved in the response to the current pandemic in our hospital and, singularly, those who suffered COVID-19.
The authors would like to thank Janet Dawson for correcting the English grammar and syntax throughout the manuscript and David Lora for the review of the statistical analysis.
We gratefully acknowledge all the investigators who participated in the SEMICOVID-19 Registry. We also thank the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry Coordinating Center, for their quality control data, and logistic and administrative support.
Data Availability
Data is contained within the article.
Declarations
Ethics Approval
The SEMI-COVID-19 Registry was approved by the Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Málaga (Spain) on March 27, 2020 (Ethics Committee code: SEMICOVID-19 27/03/20) and endorsed by the ethics committee of each participant hospital.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Raquel Díaz-Simón and Antonio Lalueza contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan. China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Lee JH. COVID-19 as the leading cause of death in the United States. JAMA. 2021;325(2):123–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Bartoletti M, Giannella M, Scudeller L, Tedeschi S, Rinaldi M, Bussini L, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for severe respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicentre cohort study (PREDI-CO study) Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(11):1545–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fu L, Wang B, Yuan T, Chen X, Ao Y, Fitzpatrick T, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020;80(6):656–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in 8 Wuhan. China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(15):762–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang L, He W, Yu X, Hu D, Bao M, Liu H, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. 2020;80(6):639–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(4):844–7. doi: 10.1111/jth.14768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan. China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7):934–43. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1763–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, Chen B, Chen A, Li C, et al. Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(8):1081–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yu T, Cai S, Zheng Z, Cai X, Liu Y, Yin S, et al. Association between clinical manifestations and prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Clin Ther. 2020;42(6):964–72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Banerjee A, Pasea L, Harris S, Gonzalez-Izquierdo A, Torralbo A, Shallcross L, et al. Estimating excess 1-year mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic according to underlying conditions and age: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1715–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30854-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shang Y, Liu T, Wei Y, Li J, Shao L, Liu M, et al. Scoring systems for predicting mortality for severe patients with COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.EuroMOMO Bulletin 2020. https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps.
- 18.Chen R, Liang W, Jiang M, Guan W, Zhan C, Wang T, et al. Risk factors of fatal outcome in hospitalized subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 from a nationwide analysis in China. Chest. 2020;158(1):97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Instituto Nacional de Estadistica 2020. Esperanza de vida. https://www.ine.es/ss/SatelliteL=es_ES&c=INESeccion_C&cid=1259926380048&p=1254735110672&pagename=ProductosYServicios/PYSLayout.
- 20.Casas-Rojo JM, Anton-Santos JM, Millan-Nunez-Cortes J, Lumbreras-Bermejo C, Ramos-Rincon JM, Roy-Vallejo E, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Spain: results from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. Rev Clin Esp. 2020;220(8):480–94. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region. Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574–81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Myers LC, Parodi SM, Escobar GJ, Liu VX. Characteristics of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 in an integrated health care system in California. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2195–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cunningham JW, Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Jering KS, Bhatt AS, Rosenthal N, et al. Clinical outcomes in young US adults hospitalized with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1612–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ji D, Zhang D, Xu J, Chen Z, Yang T, Zhao P, et al. Prediction for progression risk in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: the CALL Score. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1393–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ramos-Rincon JM, Buonaiuto V, Ricci M, Martin-Carmona J, Paredes-Ruiz D, Calderon-Moreno M, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in very old patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Spain. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Hewitt J, Carter B, Vilches-Moraga A, Quinn TJ, Braude P, Verduri A, et al. The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): a multicentre, European, observational cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(8):e444–e51. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30146-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ministerio de Sanidad. Documento técnico: Manejo clínico del COVID-19: atención hospitalaria. 18 de junio de 2020. https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/Protocolo_manejo_clinico_ah_COVID-19.pdf.
- 30.Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Ware LB, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007;132(2):410–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gold JAW, Rossen LM, Ahmad FB, Sutton P, Li Z, Salvatore PP, et al. Race, ethnicity, and age trends in persons who died from COVID-19 - United States, May-August 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(42):1517–21. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6942e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Q, Zhang T, Li F, Mao Z, Kang H, Tao L, et al. Acute kidney injury can predict in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with COVID-19 in the ICU: a single-center study. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:2095–107. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S273720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haimovich AD, Ravindra NG, Stoytchev S, Young HP, Wilson FP, van Dijk D, et al. Development and validation of the quick COVID-19 severity index: a prognostic tool for early clinical decompensation. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(4):442–53. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bae S, et al. Impact of cardiovascular disease and risk factors on fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19 according to age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2021;107:373–380. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX 476 kb)
(PDF 190 kb)
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.