Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Jul 30;15(7):e0009643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009643

Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in Malawian children with diarrheal disease

Pui-Ying Iroh Tam 1,2,3,*, Mphatso Chisala 1, Wongani Nyangulu 1,¤, Herbert Thole 1, James Nyirenda 1
Editor: jong-Yil Chai4
PMCID: PMC8357119  PMID: 34329296

Abstract

Background

Respiratory cryptosporidiosis has been documented in children with diarrhea. We sought to describe the dynamics of respiratory involvement in children hospitalized with gastrointestinal (GI) diarrheal disease.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational longitudinal study of Malawian children 2–24 months hospitalized with diarrhea. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, induced sputum and stool specimens were collected. Participants that were positive by Cryptosporidium PCR in any of the three compartments were followed up with fortnightly visits up to 8 weeks post-enrollment.

Results

Of the 162 children recruited, participants had mild-moderate malnutrition (mean HAZ -1.6 (SD 2.1)), 37 (21%) were PCR-positive for Cryptosporidium at enrollment (37 stool, 11 sputum, and 4 NP) and 27 completed the majority of follow-up visits (73%). Cryptosporidium was detected in all compartments over the 4 post-enrollment visits, most commonly in stool (100% at enrollment with mean cycle thresholds (Ct) of 28.8±4.3 to 44% at 8 weeks with Ct 29.9±4.1), followed by sputum (31% at enrollment with mean Ct 31.1±4.4 to 20% at 8 weeks with Ct 35.7±2.6), then NP (11% with mean Ct 33.5±1.0 to 8% with Ct 36.6±0.7). Participants with Cryptosporidium detection in both the respiratory and GI tract over the study period reported respiratory and GI symptoms in 81% and 62% of study visits, respectively, compared to 68% and 27%, respectively, for those with only GI detection, and had longer GI shedding (17.5±6.6 v. 15.9±2.9 days).

Conclusion

Cryptosporidium was detected in both respiratory and GI tracts throughout the 8 weeks post-enrollment. The development of therapeutics for Cryptosporidium in children should target the respiratory as well as GI tract.

Author summary

We conducted a prospective, observational longitudinal study of Malawian children 2–24 months hospitalized with diarrhea. NP swabs, induced sputum and stool specimens were collected. Participants that were positive by Cryptosporidium PCR in any of the three compartments were followed up with fortnightly visits up to 8 weeks post-enrollment. Cryptosporidium was detected by PCR in 21%, 7% and 3% in stool, sputum and nasopharynx of children hospitalized with diarrhea. Of those positive at enrollment, detection was noted in 44%, 20%, and 8%, respectively, by 8 weeks post-enrollment.

Introduction

Cryptosporidiosis is a cause of diarrhea [13], excess mortality [4,5], stunting [1,6], and is associated with malnutrition [6,7]. The Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS) identified Cryptosporidium as second most common cause of diarrhea among infants (0–11 months) in all four African countries studied (The Gambia, Mali, Mozambique, Kenya) regardless of HIV prevalence, and among the top five causes for older children (12–23 months) [4]. Respiratory cryptosporidiosis has been documented in up to a third of children presenting with diarrhea [8]; furthermore, respiratory detection without intestinal involvement has been reported [9,10], raising the possibility of primary respiratory infection with Cryptosporidium, either by inhalation or by contact with fomites [11].

Studies have identified Cryptosporidium in sputum but have not looked at whether respiratory involvement is a transient phenomenon or a reservoir for gastrointestinal (GI) disease. This has implications for therapeutic development. Our primary objective was to evaluate whether respiratory involvement of Cryptosporidium is a transient phenomenon in diarrheal disease, and to assess for respiratory and GI cryptosporidiosis concurrently and longitudinally in children hospitalized with diarrheal disease.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the University of Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (P.07/18/2438) and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee (18–066). Written consent was obtained from parents or guardians prior to enrollment.

Study design, setting, and participants

We conducted a prospective, observational-longitudinal study of Malawian children hospitalized with diarrhea [12]. Children aged 2–24 months and presenting with primary GI symptoms to Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH) in Blantyre, Malawi, were screened. Eligible patients were those with at least three or more loose stools within the past 24 hours. Those with dysentery, or visible blood in loose stools, were excluded.

Clinical procedures

Once written consent was obtained, a detailed history and physical exam was conducted and all then enrolled subjects had a NP swab, induced sputum, and stool sample collected. For induced sputum collection, subjects were given a nebulized 3% sodium chloride mist to inhale for 5–15 minutes. For infants, suctioning of the oropharynx was done after nebulization to collect the specimen. To ensure safety of the subject, induced sputum was only collected if there were no contraindications (based on PERCH criteria for induced sputum collection) [13]: severe hypoxia <92% on supplemental oxygen; inability to protect airways; severe bronchospasm at admission (defined as continued hypoxia <92% after appropriate bronchodilator therapy, with other markers of respiratory distress); seizure within the past 24 hours; or deemed inappropriate by the clinician for another reason (e.g. midface trauma, inhalational injury, pulmonary effusion, congestive heart failure, congenital heart disease, etc). If the above symptoms/conditions resolved within 48 hours, induced sputum collection was reconsidered at that point.

HIV rapid testing was conducted on infants and, if positive, infants were referred to the pediatric HIV clinic for further care. Any relevant lab investigations (including full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, malaria parasite screen, blood and/or CSF culture, TB GeneXpert and AFB testing) performed as part of routine care were recorded.

All participating children had enrollment NP, sputum and stool specimens evaluated for Cryptosporidium by PCR. Sputum quality was evaluated by microscopy (good quality: ≤10 squamous epithelial cells/high powered field). Only subjects where Cryptosporidium was detected by PCR on any one of NP/sputum/stool were followed up in the post-enrollment phase up to 8 weeks post-enrollment, with a follow-up visit every two weeks for evaluation of symptoms, physical assessment, as well as NP/sputum/stool sampling.

Laboratory procedures

DNA was extracted in stool using QIAamp Fast Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and for respiratory tract using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) for Cryptosporidium [14], and UCP Mini kit (Qiagen) for respiratory co-pathogens. Cryptosporidium detection of specimens at enrollment were measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), with appropriate positive and negative controls. In subsequent follow-up samples in stool, Cryptosporidium was detected using qPCR in a TaqMan Array Card (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) using a custom design developed at the Houpt Laboratory (Charlottesville, VA) [15] and tested for 28 enteropathogens: rotavirus, norovirus GII, adenovirus, astrovirus, sapovirus, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), Shiga-toxigenic E. coli (STEC), Shigella/enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni/C. coli, Vibrio cholerae, Clostridium difficile, Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Trichuris trichiura. In sputum, for multiplex PCR we used the respiratory pathogens 33 kit (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg, Luxembourg) which detected: S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, M. catarrhalis, B. pertussis, H. influenzae and H. influenzae type b, C. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, and Salmonella species, influenza A/B/C, RSV A/B, parainfluenza virus types 1–4, coronaviruses NL63, 229E, OC43, and HKU1, human metapneumovirus A/B, rhinovirus, adenovirus, enterovirus, parechovirus, bocavirus, cytomegalovirus, and P. jirovecii.

Statistical analysis

Frequencies and proportions of observed levels were reported for binary and categorical variables, with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals given where appropriate. Comparisons were performed using the Fisher’s exact test for binary and categorical variables, t-test (two groups) or ANOVA (three or more groups) for approximately normally distributed variables and Wilcoxon rank sum (2 groups) or Kruskal-Wallis (3 or more groups) tests for variables with severely nonparametric distributions. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software, version 16, and statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Results

From 1 March 2019 to 3 April 2020, 162 children were recruited into the study. Two children did not submit specimens. Of the remaining 160 children, 37 (21%) were positive in any one of the three samples collected (37 stool (21%), 11 sputum (7%), and 4 NP (2%)) and were entered into follow-up. The study was discontinued early due to COVID-19, by which time 27 children had completed at least three of the four follow-up visits (73%).

Among the 162 children who were hospitalized with diarrhea, the mean age was 11.6±5.0 months, and 59% were male (Table 1). Mean height-for-age (HAZ), weight-for-age (WAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ) z scores were -1.6±2.1, -1.0±1.3, and 0.1±1.6, respectively. Fifteen percent of mothers were HIV-infected, and five of those children tested positive by HIV rapid test (3% of total). The participants had a mean of 4.5±1.4 persons in a household, and the majority of children had access to a pit toilet/latrine (95%), piped drinking water (78%), and harbored a residential animal in the compound (66%). Among the 37 children who were Cryptosporidium PCR-positive, the mean age was 11.8±4.9 months, 65% were male and two (6%) were positive by HIV rapid test. No significant differences in characteristics between children who were Cryptosporidium-positive versus -negative were noted (S1 Table).

Table 1. Characteristics of children hospitalized with diarrhea at enrollment.

Characteristic Children with diarrhea (n = 162)a Cryptosporidium -positive (n = 37) Cryptosporidium -negative (n = 123) P value
Demographics
Age, months, mean (SD) 11.6 (5.0) 11.8 (4.9) 11.5 (5.1) 0.897
    2–11 months 90 (56%) 24 (60%) 65 (53%) 0.565
    12–24 months 72 (44%) 13 (40%) 58 (47%)
Male sex 95 (59%) 24 (65%) 70 (57%) 0.649
Mother is employed (%) 72 (44%) 20 (54%) 52 (42%) 0.208
Number of household members (SD) 4.5 (1.4) 4.2(1.4) 4.5(1.4) 0.204
    Children <5 years (SD) 1.3 (0.5) 1.2 (0.6) 1.3 (0.5) 0.533
Residential animals in the compound (%) 107 (66%) 22 (59%) 84 (68%) 0.359
Facility for disposing feces in households (%)
    Pit toilet/latrine 154 (95%) 36 (97%) 116 (94%) 0.686
    Pour/flush toilet 8 (5%) 1 (3%) 7 (6%)
Child health indicators
Mother HIV status (%)
    Positive 25 (15%) 8 (22%) 17 (14%) 0.391
    Unknown 55 (34%) 10 (29%) 42 (34%)
Child HIV rapid test (%)
    Positive 5 (3%) 2 (6%) 3 (2%) 0.158
    Unknown/not done 120 (74%) 24 (63%) 94 (76%)
Z score (SD)
    HAZ -1.6 (2.1) -1.4 (2.1) -1.6 (2.1) 0.552
    WAZ -1.0 (1.3) -1.0 (1.3) -0.9 (1.3) 0.831
    WHZ 0.1 (1.6) -0.1 (1.6) 0.2 (2.3) 0.396
MUAC, cm (SD) 13.7 (1.4) 13.7 (1.3) 13.8 (1.4) 0.692
Bipedal edema (%) 5 (3%) 1 (3%) 4 (3%) 1.000
Enrollment vitals and symptoms
Temperature, °C (SD) 36.7 (0.7) 36.7 (0.6) 36.8 (0.7) 0.422
Respiratory rate, breaths/min (SD) 36 (6.1) 36.4 (8.4) 35.9 (5.3) 0.902
Oxygen saturations, % (SD) 98.6 (1.4) 98.6 (1.4) 98.7 (1.4) 0.719
GI symptoms (%)
    Vomiting 70 (43%) 18 (48%) 50 (41%) 0.847
    Abdominal pain/ tenderness 65 (40%) 13 (35%) 50 (41%) 0.330
    Poor feeding 66 (40%) 14 (38%) 50 (41%) 0.945
    Dehydration 90 (56%) 21 (57%) 68 (55%) 0.845
Respiratory symptoms (%)
    Cough 98 (61%) 25 (68%) 71 (58%) 0.283
    Runny nose 58 (36%) 17 (46%) 39 (32%) 0.150
    Difficulty in breathing 3 (2%) 1 (3%) 2 (2%) 0.531
    Wheezing 14 (9%) 4 (11%) 9 (7%) 0.487
    Chest indrawings/retractions 2 (1%) 0 2 (2%) 1.000
    Crackles 17 (11%) 6 (17%) 10 (8%) 0.125
Cryptosporidium-PCR positive
    Stool (%) 37 (21%) 37 (100%) 0 <0.001
    Induced sputum (%) 11 (7%) 11 (31%) 0 <0.001
    NP (%) 4 (2%) 4 (11%) 0 <0.001
Sputum quality (%)
    Good (≤10 sq epis/hpf) 131/160 (82%) 30 (81%) 101 (82%) 0.013
    Poor (>10 sq epis/hpf) 15/160 (9%) 1 (3%) 14 (12%)
    Unreadableb 14/160 (9%) 6 (17%) 8 (7%)
Outcomes
    Mortality, inpatient (%) NA 0 NA
    Mortality, post-discharge (%) NA 1 (3%) NA

GI, gastrointestinal; HAZ, Height-for-age z score; HPF, high powered field; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation; WAZ, Weight-for-age z score; WHZ, Weight-for-height z score

a2/162 withdrew at enrolment, 1 submitted a respiratory but not a stool sample.

bUnable to assess sputum quality due to poor appearance.

Induced sputum quality at enrollment was good in 82%, poor in 9% and unreadable in 9%, with similar proportions of good quality sputum among Cryptosporidium-positive and -negative participants (81% and 82%, respectively). Over the 8-week period, Cryptosporidium was detected in both respiratory and GI tracts (Table 2): most commonly in stool (100% at enrollment to 44% at 8 weeks), followed by sputum (31% at enrollment to 20% at 8 weeks), then NP (11% to 8%). Lowest Ct counts were generally noted in the stool (mean Ct 28.8±4.3 at enrollment to 29.9±4.1 at 8 weeks), followed by sputum (mean Ct 31.1± 4.4 at enrollment to 35.7±2.6 at 8 weeks), and NP ((mean Ct 33.5±1.0 to 36.6±0.7); Fig 1). When stratified by age, infants 2–11 months had lower stool Ct counts compared to those 12–24 months (mean Ct 27.5±4.4 v. 30.2±3.5), but this was not statistically significant (S2 Table). We detected Cryptosporidium in respiratory but not GI tract in 6 study visits. All NP-positive subjects were also sputum-positive, with the exception of one case at enrollment, a 15 month-old male with no respiratory symptoms in whom Cryptosporidium was detected in the NP (Ct 35.6) and stool (Ct 35.7), but not sputum. Detection in the respiratory tract did not always correlate with symptoms (Fig 2A–2H). For individual participants in whom Cryptosporidium was detected at enrollment, detection was noted most consistently in the GI tract throughout the 8 weeks. Respiratory co-pathogens were detected in 87/104 (84%) visits over the follow-up period.

Table 2. Longitudinal detection of Cryptosporidium in stool and respiratory tract and associated symptoms.

Characteristics Study period
Enrollment (n = 37) 2 weeksa (n = 27) 4 weeksb (n = 24) 6 weeksc (n = 26) 8 weeksd (n = 25)
Cryptosporidium detection
Detection in NP 4 (11%) 5 (19%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%)
    NP Ct values (SD) 33.5 (1.0) 33.7 (2.0) 35.6 (0.6) 35.7 36.6 (0.7)
Detection in sputum 11 (31%) 10 (37%) 10 (42%) 8 (31%) 5 (20%)
    Sputum Ct values (SD) 31.1 (4.4) 29.9(3.6) 33.0 (2.6) 34.3 (2.9) 35.7 (2.6)
Detection in GI tract 37 (100%) 22 (81%) 16 (67%) 11 (42%) 11 (44%)
    Stool Ct values (SD) 28.8 (4.3) 26.0 (4.5) 30.3 (2.8) 31.3 (3.5) 29.9 (4.1)
Detection in respiratory tract only 0 0 1 (4%) 3 (8%) 2 (8%)
Detection in GI tract only 27 (73%) 12 (43%) 7 (29%) 5 (19%) 8 (32%)
Detection in respiratory and GI tract 10 (27%) 9 (33%) 9 (26%) 6 (23%) 3 (12%)
Presentation
Referral to health facility for an illness in the past 7 days 36 (100%) 10 (37%) 6 (25%) 5 (19%) 7 (28%)
Diarrhea in the past 7 days 36 (100%) 0 2 (8%) 4 (15%) 3 (12%)
Respiratory symptoms in the past 7 dayse 26 (72%) 9/10 (90%) 4/6 (67%) 2/5(40%) 5/7 (71%)
    Cough 24 (69%) 5/10 (50%) 2/6 (33%) 2/5 (40%) 5/7 (71%)
    Runny nose 16 (46%) 7/10 (70%) 4/6 (67%) 1/5 (20%) 3/7 (43%)
    Difficulty in breathing 1 (3%) 0 0 0 0
    Wheezing 4 (11%) 3/10 (30%) 1/6 (17%) 1/5 (20%) 0
    Chest indrawings/ retractions 0 0 0 0 0
    Crackles 6 (17%) 5/10 (50%) 1/6 (17%) 1/5 (20%) 0/7
    Vomiting 16 (46%) 0/10 0/6 1/5 (20%) 0/7
    Abdominal pain/ tenderness 11 (31%) 1/10 (10%) 1/6 (17%) 1/5 (20%) 0/7
    Poor feeding 14 (40%) 0 0 0 0
Other household members with respiratory symptoms 13 (37%) 1/6 (17%) 3/5 (60%) 0 0
Other household members with GI symptoms 4 (11%) 0 3 (13%) 1 (4%) 2 (8%)
Vital signs
Respiratory rate, breaths/min (SD) 36 (6.1) 34.7 (3.4) 32.8 (3.2) 34.4 (5.7) 32.3 (3.7)
Oxygen saturations, % (SD) 98.6 (1.4) 99.1 (1.2) 98.5 (1.1) 99.4 (0.8) 98.8 (1.4)
Outcome
Mortality 1f (3%) 0 0 0 0

Ct, cycle threshold; GI, gastrointestinal; NP, nasopharynx; SD, standard deviation

aTwo children withdrew at enrollment, one child withdrew after enrollment, five did not enter follow-up due to early stopping of study, and three were lost to follow-up.

bThree children missed week 4 visit.

cOne child missed week 6 visit.

dTwo children did not complete week 8 visit due to early stopping of study.

eIn follow-up study visits, symptoms were recorded only if these led to health facility referral.

fPatient died after discharge before the week 2 visit.

Fig 1. Comparison of Cryptosporidium detection in GI and respiratory tracts (mean cycle threshold with 95% confidence intervals) over 8 weeks in children hospitalized with diarrheal disease.

Fig 1

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Patient-level dynamics of Cryptosporidium detection in GI and respiratory tracts over 8 weeks in a: A) 10 month-old; B) 14 month-old; C) 14 month-old; D) 7 month-old; E) 11 month-old; F) 11 month-old; G) 10 month-old; and H) 15 month-old.

Respiratory symptoms were noted in 72% of Cryptosporidium-positive participants at enrollment, the most common symptom being cough (69%), but also included runny nose (46%), crackles (17%) and wheeze (11%). For those entered into the 8-week follow-up period, participants with Cryptosporidium positivity in the respiratory tract had respiratory symptoms in 23/43 (53%) of visits.

Among participants with Cryptosporidium detection in both the respiratory and GI tract at enrollment compared to those with Cryptosporidium detection in the GI tract only (Table 3), a larger proportion reported respiratory symptoms (90% v. 65%), and GI shedding of Cryptosporidium was longer (14.3±2.1 v. 14.1±0.7 days), but these were not statistically significant. Among participants whom Cryptosporidium was detected in both the respiratory and GI tract at any point over the 8-week study period compared to GI tract only, a larger proportion reported respiratory (81% v. 68%) and GI symptoms (62% v. 27%) per study visit, and GI shedding of Cryptosporidium was longer (17.5±6.6 v. 15.9±2.9 days), but again these were not statistically significant.

Table 3. Characteristics and associated symptoms in participants with Cryptosporidium detection in GI tract only v. GI and respiratory tract A) at enrollment; B) at any point throughout study period.

Characteristic At enrollment (n = 37) At any point throughout study period (n = 27)
GI detection only (n = 27) GI and respiratory detection (n = 10) P value GI detection only (n = 16) GI and respiratory detection (n = 11) P value
Age, months (SD) 11.3 (5.3) 13 (4.0) 0.370 12.2 (2.3) 12.0 (6.7) 0.922
Male sex 18 (67%) 6 (60%) 0.7664 9 (56%) 8 (72%) 0.448
Z score (SD)
    HAZ -1.4 (2.4) -1.3 (1.1) 0.896 -1.6 (2.5) -1.4 (1.9) 0.837
    WAZ -1.1 (1.4) -0.6 (1.2) 0.319 -1.1 (1.2) -0.8 (1.2) 0.474
    WHZ -0.2 (1.6) 0.0 (1.7) 0.708 -0.1 (1.7) 0.0 (1.6) 0.945
Number of household members (SD) 4.2 (1.4) 4.3 (1.5) 0.771 4.4 (1.5) 4.1 (0.9) 0.504
    Household children <5 years 1.3 (0.7) 1.1 (0.3) 0.449 1.1 (0.1) 1.2 (0.1) 0.696
Pit latrine 26 (96%) 10 (100%) 0.529 16 (100%) 10 (90%) 0.407
Piped water for drinking 4 (15%) 1 (10%) 0.916 2 (13%) 3 (27%) 0.370
Piped water for utensils 19 (69%) 6 (60%) 0.448 13 (81%) 4 (45%) 0.124
Treated water (%) 14 (50%) 2 (20%) 0.142 6 (37%) 5 (45%) 0.710
Residential animals in the compound 15 (54%) 7 (70%) 0.467 11 (69%) 7 (63%) 1.000
Respiratory symptoms 17 (65%) 9 (90%) 0.223 11 (68%) 9 (81%) 0.385
Enrollment oxygen sats, % (SD) 98.5 (1.4) 98.8 (1.2) 0.561 98.5% (1.1) 98.3% (1.7) 0.653
GI symptoms 24 (89%) 8 (80%) 0.603 3 (27%) 10 (62%) 0.120
+ 14.1 (0.7) 14.3 (2.1) 0.819 15.9 (2.9) 17.5 (6.6) 0.445

GI, gastrointestinal; HAZ, Height-for-age z score; SD, standard deviation; WAZ, Weight-for-age z score; WHZ, Weight-for-height z score

Discussion

This is the first longitudinal study to evaluate the respiratory cryptosporidiosis in pediatric diarrheal disease. In children hospitalized with diarrheal disease, Cryptosporidium was detected most frequently in stool, followed by sputum and NP. The most common respiratory symptom was cough. Longitudinally, we detected Cryptosporidium in both respiratory and GI tracts through 8 weeks post-enrollment, usually at lowest Ct counts in stool, followed by sputum and then NP. Longer GI shedding of Cryptosporidium was noted among those where we detected Cryptosporidium in both the respiratory and GI tracts, compared to GI detection only, although findings did not reach statistical significance.

Our Cryptosporidium detection rate is far higher than has been reported in diarrhea studies in sub-Saharan Africa, with rates of positivity ranging from 9% in Kenya to 14.7% in Mozambique [4,8]. Subclinical Cryptosporidium infection was noted to be high (6%) in Tanzania [16]. A previous study done at QECH found Cryptosporidium to be the third most common cause of diarrhea with a prevalence in stool of 28% among cases [17]. In our study, the positivity rate was 21%, and this would be 12% if we used the GEMS diarrheagenic cutoffs [18]. This thus supports the high prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection among young children hospitalized with diarrheal illness in sub-Saharan Africa.

Few studies, however, have evaluated the prevalence of respiratory cryptosporidiosis in pediatric diarrheal disease. A study in Uganda detected Cryptosporidium in 35.4% of induced sputum samples from children presenting with diarrhea who were Cryptosporidium-positive in the stool [8]. In our study, cough was noted in almost two-thirds of children presenting with diarrhea, and the frequency of respiratory signs and symptoms tended to be higher, but were not significantly different between those with Cryptosporidium-positive and -negative stool samples. In addition to sampling the lower respiratory tract with induced sputum, we also collected NP specimens throughout the follow-up period, and documented detection throughout the 8-week period, although in fewer numbers, more intermittently, and at higher Ct counts compared to sputum. Respiratory symptoms were more common among those Cryptosporidium-positive in respiratory and GI tract compared to positive in GI tract alone, although again these findings were not statistically significant. In contrast to the Uganda study, which only collected sputum samples from children with cough, unexplained tachypnea or hypoxia, we collected respiratory specimens in all participants at enrollment and noted that participants with Cryptosporidium positivity in the respiratory tract had respiratory symptoms in just over half of visits. These data support that almost half the participants with respiratory Cryptosporidium detection are asymptomatic, and is a lower, rather than upper, respiratory tract pathogen or colonizer [1922].

The continued detection of Cryptosporidium in both GI and respiratory tract over 8 weeks may reflect the young age of this population. A study in Bangladesh noted that children ≤2 years positive for Cryptosporidium shed it for a mean of 4.1 weeks, which was significantly longer than those >2 years (mean 1.7 weeks) [23]. However, that was a household transmission study and did not evaluate children hospitalized with diarrhea. For respiratory pathogens, prolonged detection of respiratory viruses has been noted in a community surveillance study in Utah, with significantly longer detection noted in children <5 years (mean 1.9 weeks) compared to other age groups (mean 1.6–1.7 weeks) [24]. To our knowledge, prolonged detection in the respiratory tract has not before been described for a protozoan parasite; this was not associated with higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms.

Prevalence of cryptosporidiosis is higher in cases of persistent v. acute diarrhea (15% v. 6.1% in a study in Guinea Bissau [5]). Persistent diarrhea has been described for cryptosporidiosis with duration of up to 5 months among severely immunocompromised infants [25]. In the Etiology, Risk Factors and Interactions of Enteric Infections and Malnutrition and the Consequences for Child Health and Development Program (MAL-ED) study, cryptosporidiosis was the fifth highest attributable pathogen in all pediatric diarrhea in the community setting, and had increased frequency among those with prolonged and severe diarrhea [3]. Among our participants, GI symptoms resolved within 2 weeks of hospitalization for all participants, but Cryptosporidium was detected in stool for eight participants throughout the 8-week period. Shedding duration for cryptosporidiosis among children hospitalized with diarrhea in sub-Saharan Africa has not been described previously using molecular techniques, although in Malawian HIV-infected adults we documented consistent shedding for up to 8 weeks [26]. Nutritional status may also account for the prolonged detection of up to 8 weeks that we documented in our study population. Even though the mean WHZ was within normal, the mean HAZ and WAZ of recruited participants both met WHO criteria for stunting and wasting, and 41%, 22%, and 10% had HAZ, WAZ, and WHZ <-2, respectively, indicating mild-moderate malnutrition in this population. Reduced nutritional status could impact host immunity and predisposition to colonization/infection [2729].

Cryptosporidiosis has been associated with excess mortality in children who had the infection in infancy, and this excess mortality persists into the second year of life [4,5]. In our study we had one death, which occurred in a 7 month-old breastfeeding, HIV unknown male. This child had anthropometric parameters consistent with severe acute malnutrition (mid-upper arm circumference 11 cm, HAZ -1.85, WAZ -3.01, WHZ -2.47, no nutritional edema) at time of enrollment, and an enrollment Cryptosporidium Ct of 23 in the stool but negative in sputum and NP. At time of enrollment he was afebrile with normal vitals and had mild dehydration, diarrhea associated with abdominal tenderness and vomiting, as well as runny nose, cough and wheeze, but no shortness of breath. Death occurred two weeks after hospitalization after the child developed a cough and fever and was treated at an outpatient health facility.

This study has several limitations. The sample size was small, and the study population was drawn from a single hospital, and therefore findings may not be generalizable to other settings. Secondly, we did not evaluate for respiratory co-pathogens in our enrollment specimens, thereby limiting our ability ascribe symptoms to a single pathogen, although we did document co-pathogen detection in 84% during the follow-up period. Thirdly, we did not genotype Cryptosporidium to ascertain whether re-infections occurred. However, these limitations are balanced out by the longitudinal observational design, which allowed us to document for the first time the dynamics of respiratory Cryptosporidium among children hospitalized with diarrheal disease.

Conclusion

In summary, in this study we demonstrated that over 20% of young children hospitalized with diarrheal disease in our setting are positive for Cryptosporidium, and they can shed Cryptosporidium in the stool for up to 2 months. Concurrent respiratory cryptosporidiosis can be detected in a substantial proportion of young children, and detection continues over a prolonged period, with detection more prominent in the lower rather than upper respiratory tract. However, the small sample size limits our ability to make a definitive conclusion.

Nevertheless, this has implications for the development of therapeutics for cryptosporidiosis, which is limited currently to nitazoxanide, and which is poorly efficacious in malnourished children [30,31]. Since malnourished children are in greatest need for Cryptosporidium therapeutics, scientists have been actively trying to find new, more effective drugs to treat cryptosporidiosis in this population. Because safety is of paramount concern in this age group, those developing drugs have debated whether a drug that only resides in the GI tract would be adequate for treating cryptosporidiosis in malnourished children, compared to one with broader systemic distribution [32]. Our findings suggest that the respiratory tract is a significant reservoir for Cryptosporidium infection, and that to cure children, may require a drug that distributes to the lungs as well as the GI tract. Thus, future research on therapeutic development should focus on drugs that target not only the GI but also the respiratory tract.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Full characteristics of study population at enrollment.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Cryptosporidium-positive at enrollment study population characteristics, stratified by age.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and parents for participating in this study; research clinical and laboratory staff for conducting the study; David Moore and Tanja Adams with training the CryptoResp clinical and laboratory teams; Eric Houpt and Darwin Operario with providing TAC cards and technical assistance; Neema Toto for interim study support; Thokozani Ganiza for assistance with data management; and Wes Van Voorhis for reviewing drafts, and providing feedback and support throughout the project.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of these data are owned by the Government of Malawi. Data are available from the University of Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data (comrec@medcol.mw).

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1191165 to PI). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Berkman DS, Lescano AG, Gilman RH, Lopez SL, Black MM. Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: a follow-up study. Lancet 2002; 359(9306): 564–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07744-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lima AA, Moore SR, Barboza MS Jr., et al. Persistent diarrhea signals a critical period of increased diarrhea burdens and nutritional shortfalls: a prospective cohort study among children in northeastern Brazil. J Infect Dis 2000; 181(5): 1643–51. doi: 10.1086/315423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Platts-Mills JA, Babji S, Bodhidatta L, et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3(9): e564–75. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00151-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013; 382(9888): 209–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Molbak K, Hojlyng N, Gottschau A, et al. Cryptosporidiosis in infancy and childhood mortality in Guinea Bissau, west Africa. BMJ 1993; 307(6901): 417–20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Korpe PS, Haque R, Gilchrist C, et al. Natural History of Cryptosporidiosis in a Longitudinal Study of Slum-Dwelling Bangladeshi Children: Association with Severe Malnutrition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10(5): e0004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Costa LB, JohnBull EA, Reeves JT, et al. Cryptosporidium-malnutrition interactions: mucosal disruption, cytokines, and TLR signaling in a weaned murine model. J Parasitol 2011; 97(6): 1113–20. doi: 10.1645/GE-2848.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mor SM, Tumwine JK, Ndeezi G, et al. Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in HIV-seronegative children in Uganda: potential for respiratory transmission. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50(10): 1366–72. doi: 10.1086/652140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hojlyng N, Jensen BN. Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in HIV-positive patients. Lancet 1988; 1(8585): 590–1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91384-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mercado R, Buck GA, Manque PA, Ozaki LS. Cryptosporidium hominis infection of the human respiratory tract. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13(3): 462–4. doi: 10.3201/eid1303.060394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sponseller JK, Griffiths JK, Tzipori S. The evolution of respiratory Cryptosporidiosis: evidence for transmission by inhalation. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27(3): 575–86. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00115-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nyangulu W, Van Voorhis W, Iroh Tam PY. Evaluating respiratory cryptosporidiosis in pediatric diarrheal disease: protocol for a prospective, observational study in Malawi. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19(1): 728. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4380-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grant LR, Hammitt LL, Murdoch DR, O’Brien KL, Scott JA. Procedures for collection of induced sputum specimens from children. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54Suppl 2: S140–5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stroup SE, Roy S, McHele J, et al. Real-time PCR detection and speciation of Cryptosporidium infection using Scorpion probes. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55(Pt 9): 1217–22. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46678-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu J, Kabir F, Manneh J, et al. Development and assessment of molecular diagnostic tests for 15 enteropathogens causing childhood diarrhoea: a multicentre study. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14(8): 716–24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70808-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Korpe PS, Valencia C, Haque R, et al. Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Cryptosporidiosis in Children From 8 Low-income Sites: Results From the MAL-ED Study. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67(11): 1660–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iturriza-Gomara M, Jere KC, Hungerford D, et al. Etiology of Diarrhea Among Hospitalized Children in Blantyre, Malawi, Following Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction: A Case-Control Study. J Infect Dis 2019; 220(2): 213–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet 2016; 388(10051): 1291–301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31529-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clavel A, Arnal AC, Sanchez EC, et al. Respiratory cryptosporidiosis: case series and review of the literature. Infection 1996; 24(5): 341–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01716076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dupont C, Bougnoux ME, Turner L, Rouveix E, Dorra M. Microbiological findings about pulmonary cryptosporidiosis in two AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34(1): 227–9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.227-229.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lopez-Velez R, Tarazona R, Garcia Camacho A, et al. Intestinal and extraintestinal cryptosporidiosis in AIDS patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1995; 14(8): 677–81. doi: 10.1007/BF01690873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Poirot JL, Deluol AM, Antoine M, et al. Broncho-pulmonary cryptosporidiosis in four HIV-infected patients. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1996; 43(5): 78S–9S. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb05007.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Korpe PS, Gilchrist C, Burkey C, et al. Case-Control Study of Cryptosporidium Transmission in Bangladeshi Households. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 68(7): 1073–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Byington CL, Ampofo K, Stockmann C, et al. Community Surveillance of Respiratory Viruses Among Families in the Utah Better Identification of Germs-Longitudinal Viral Epidemiology (BIG-LoVE) Study. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61(8): 1217–24. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kocoshis SA, Cibull ML, Davis TE, Hinton JT, Seip M, Banwell JG. Intestinal and pulmonary cryptosporidiosis in an infant with severe combined immune deficiency. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1984; 3(1): 149–57. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198401000-00028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iroh Tam PY, Arnold SLM, Barrett LK, et al. Clofazimine for treatment of cryptosporidiosis in HIV-infected adults (CRYPTOFAZ): an experimental medicine, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a trial. Clin Infect Dis 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bourke CD, Jones KDJ, Prendergast AJ. Current Understanding of Innate Immune Cell Dysfunction in Childhood Undernutrition. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 1728. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gwela A, Mupere E, Berkley JA, Lancioni C. Undernutrition, Host Immunity and Vulnerability to Infection Among Young Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2019; 38(8): e175–e7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ibrahim MK, Zambruni M, Melby CL, Melby PC. Impact of Childhood Malnutrition on Host Defense and Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2017; 30(4): 919–71. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00119-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Checkley W, White AC Jr., Jaganath D, et al. A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15(1): 85–94. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70772-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Striepen B. Parasitic infections: Time to tackle cryptosporidiosis. Nature 2013; 503(7475): 189–91. doi: 10.1038/503189a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huston CD, Spangenberg T, Burrows J, Willis P, Wells TN, van Voorhis W. A Proposed Target Product Profile and Developmental Cascade for New Cryptosporidiosis Treatments. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9(10): e0003987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009643.r001

Decision Letter 0

jong-Yil Chai, Pikka Jokelainen

18 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Iroh Tam,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in Malawian children with diarrheal disease" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

Your manuscript has been reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Both of them suggested some revisions. Please see their comments below and in the attached files.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Jong-Yil Chai

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Pikka Jokelainen

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Your manuscript has been reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Both of them suggested some revisions. Please see their comments below and in the attached files.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: See attachment.

Reviewer #2: The objectives of the study were clearly explained and a clear testable hypothesis was described. The study design was appropriate for the proposed hypothesis.

The study population was Malawian children aged 2-24 months and presenting with primary GI symptoms in Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre. This population was clearly described and appropriate for the proposed study.

The sample of children who were positive and followed for the 8 weeks was too small to achieve some of the study objectives.

The statisitical test could be have been developed more.

There were no concerns about ethical considerations.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: See attachment.

Reviewer #2: The analysis is consistent with the analysis plan and the results are clearly presented.

The results presented in some of the tables and figures could be presented more concisely. Table 1 provides a lot of information about the characteristics of the enrolled children. This could be reduced especially since no significant differences were found between cryptosporidium infected children and non-infected children.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: See attachment.

Reviewer #2: The authors conclusions are partially supported by the results presented.

The limitations regarding the small sample size are not adequately addressed.

The study is innovative and so does increase understanding of results concerning the dynamics of respiratory and GI cryptosporidium infections

The public health relevance is addressed by the authors who suggest that therapeutic drug development may require a drug that targets the lungs as well as the GI tract to cure children.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: See attachment.

Reviewer #2: The results presented in some of the tables and figures could be presented more concisely.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: See attachment.

Reviewer #2: Overall the study in well-executed. The results concerning the dynamics of respiratory and GI cryptosporidium infections are interesting and important. The small sample size makes it difficult to arrive at definitive conclusion and so the authors should stress that in their conclusions.

I have suggested that the results presented in Table 1 could be stratified by age and or gender to have a better understanding of these dynamics.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: IrohTam_2021_RespiratoryCryptoMalawi_reviewer_comments.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-21-00656_rev.docx

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009643.r003

Decision Letter 1

jong-Yil Chai, Pikka Jokelainen

11 Jul 2021

Dear Dr Iroh Tam,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in Malawian children with diarrheal disease' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Regarding corrections to spelling, please carefully check that 'Cryptosporidium' is spelled with capital first letter everywhere in the text. 

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Jong-Yil Chai

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Pikka Jokelainen

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Your revised manuscript has been reviewed by 3 independent reviewers. They gave no further comments. Thus, I am pleased to decide to accept your revised manuscript. A few things to revise (for example, all 'cryptosporidium' within the text should be 'Cryptosporidium') can be addressed while constructing the PDF.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009643.r004

Acceptance letter

jong-Yil Chai, Pikka Jokelainen

26 Jul 2021

Dear Dr Iroh Tam,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Respiratory cryptosporidiosis in Malawian children with diarrheal disease," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Full characteristics of study population at enrollment.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Cryptosporidium-positive at enrollment study population characteristics, stratified by age.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: IrohTam_2021_RespiratoryCryptoMalawi_reviewer_comments.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-21-00656_rev.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: CFR_cover letter_response.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because of these data are owned by the Government of Malawi. Data are available from the University of Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data (comrec@medcol.mw).


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES