Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Aug 11;16(8):e0253698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253698

Circulating Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes as marker for Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) levels and the association with cardiovascular risk factors in the general population

Samantha J Donkel 1, Frank J Wolters 2,3, M Arfan Ikram 2, Moniek P M de Maat 1,*
Editor: Pablo Garcia de Frutos4
PMCID: PMC8357174  PMID: 34379628

Abstract

Introduction

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are DNA scaffolds enriched with antimicrobial proteins. NETs have been implicated in the development of various diseases, such as cardiovascular disease. Here, we investigate the association of demographic and cardiovascular (CVD) risk factors with NETs in the general population.

Material and methods

Citrated plasma was collected from 6449 participants, aged ≥55 years, as part of the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. NETs were quantified by measuring MPO-DNA complex using an ELISA. We used linear regression to determine the associations between MPO-DNA complex and age, sex, cardio-metabolic risk factors, and plasma markers of inflammation and coagulation.

Results

MPO-DNA complex levels were weakly associated with age (log difference per 10 year increase: -0.04 mAU/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.06;-0.02), a history of coronary heart disease (yes versus no: -0.10 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.17;-0.03), the use of lipid-lowering drugs (yes versus no: -0.06 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.12;-0.01), and HDL-cholesterol (per mmol/l increase: -0.07 mAU/mL/, 95% CI -0.12;-0.03).

Conclusions

Older age, a history of coronary heart disease, the use of lipid-lowering drugs and higher HDL-cholesterol are weakly correlated with lower plasma levels of NETs. These findings show that the effect of CVD risk factors on NETs levels in a general population is only small and may not be of clinical relevance. This supports that NETs may play a more important role in an acute phase of disease than in a steady state situation.

Introduction

Neutrophils contribute to host defense through different mechanisms, including the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [1]. The process of NET formation is a relatively recently identified form of cell death by neutrophils which was first described by Brinkmann et al. in 2004 [2]. NETs are formed when neutrophils secrete decondensed intracellular DNA together with antimicrobial proteins such as myeloperoxidase (MPO) and neutrophil elastase. This forms a web-like structure where pathogens can be trapped and killed [2]. In addition to their function in immunity, NETs have been implicated in the pathophysiology of thrombosis [3], atherosclerosis [4], and sepsis [5, 6]. For example, NETs are found in the thrombus of patients with myocardial infarction and stroke, suggesting a role of NETs in thrombus formation [7, 8]. A better understanding of the influence of NETs in the development of diseases requires knowledge about the demographic and cardiovascular determinants (e.g. age, sex, medical history, blood markers of inflammation and coagulation) of NET formation in a general population.

Some of the mechanisms by which NET formation is determined have already been investigated in in vitro and in vivo studies [912]. For example, studies in mouse models and in vitro studies in human neutrophils have shown that the amount of NET formation decreases with increasing age. Furthermore, sex differences in NET levels have been described in patients with multiple sclerosis, where higher levels of NETs were found in males than in females [12]. Also, in neutrophils isolated from nondiabetic human subjects, high levels of glucose have been shown to induce NET formation [11]. To date, most studies on NETs levels in plasma, are case-control studies in patients with active underlying diseases where NETs levels are generally high. In order to gain more insight into biological processes involved in NET formation in a stable situation, without massive inflammation, it is important to look at determinants of NETs in the general population, where individuals are mostly free of acute diseases. Currently, population studies on NETs levels are lacking.

We therefore aimed to answer the following question: which demographic and cardiovascular risk factors are associated with NET formation in the general population?

Materials and methods

Study design and study population

This study is embedded in the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort study among individuals of 55 years and older who are living in Ommoord, a suburb of Rotterdam, The Netherlands [13]. The original cohort started in 1990 (RS-I) and of the 10,215 eligible individuals, 7,983 agreed to participate. In 1999 the study was extended with 3,011 individuals (out of 4,472 invitees) who moved into the study district or reached the age of 55 years (RS-II). Participants visit the study center every 4 years for interview and extensive clinical assessment, including venipuncture and assessment of cardiometabolic risk factors. The Rotterdam Study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC (registration number MEC 02.1015) and by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands (Population Studies Act: WBO, license number 1071272-159521-PG). The Rotterdam Study has been entered into the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR; www.trialregister.nl) and into the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; www.who.int/ictrp/network/primary/en/) under shared catalog number NTR6831. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study and to have their information obtained information from their treating physicians.

For this study, we used the data of the participants in the third examination of the original cohort (RS-I-3) between 1997 and 1999 (n = 4797) and the first examination of the extended cohort (RS-II-1) between 2000 and 2001 (n = 3011). We included all participants of whom blood samples were available (n = 6449).

Population characteristics

Data of all participants was collected by structured interviews and physical examination. Blood samples were available of 6449 individuals. Blood pressure was measured as the mean of two readings using a random-zero sphygmomanometer in sitting position. We defined hypertension as a systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher, or a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or higher, or the use of blood pressure lowering medication. Antithrombotic medication was defined as the use of vitamin K antagonists, platelet aggregation inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Lipid lowering agents were defined as the use of any lipid modifying agent. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting serum glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L and/or the use of blood glucose lowering medication [14]. Total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were measured using an automated enzymatic procedure in mmol/l. Body mass index was calculated as the weight (in kilograms) divided by the squared height (in meters). Smoking status was defined as current or no smoking at baseline. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was defined as fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and other coronary heart disease mortality. This includes myocardial infarction, myocardial revascularization, CHD mortality and overall CHD [15]. Stroke was defined as a syndrome of rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer or leading to death, with no apparent origin other than vascular [16]. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) was composed of CHD and stroke.

MPO-DNA complex measurements

Citrated plasma samples were collected at the third visit of RS-I and the baseline examination of RS-II, and stored at -80°C. We determined NET formation by measuring MPO-DNA complexes with a capture ELISA as reported earlier [4]. We adjusted the commercial human cell death ELISA kit (Cell death detection ELISAPLUS, Cat. No 11-774-425-002; Roche Diagnostics Nederland B.V., Almere, The Netherlands). Briefly, as the capturing antibody, we used anti-MPO monoclonal antibody (clone 4A4, ABD Serotec, # 0400–002). Patient plasma was added in combination with the peroxidase-labeled anti-DNA monoclonal antibody (component No.2 of the commercial cell death detection ELISA kit; Roche, #11-774-425-002). The absorbance at 405 nm wavelength was measured using Biotek Synergy HT plate reader with a reference filter of 490 nm. Values are expressed as milli arbitrary units per milliliter (mAU/mL). mAU were defined based on a preparation of NETs. Neutrophils were isolated as described previously [17], from a healthy volunteer and NET formation was induced by adding 250 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (stock 100 μg/mL in DMSO). After an incubation period of 4 hours, we assigned a value of 1000 mAU/mL to this preparation. Every ELISA plate had its own reference curve (S2 Fig in S1 File) which was composed of the calibration material which was stored in aliquots at -80°C before use. A total of 167 96-wells ELISA plates were used to measure MPO-DNA complex levels of all participants and two different reference materials were used. A new reference line was calibrated to the old one by measuring the new material several times on the reference curve of the old material, after which we assigned the value to the new calibration material. In addition, a high and low control sample were added to every individual ELISA plate. Blood samples were measured in duplicate. Coefficient of variation (CV) of the high controls was 14.5% and the CV of the low controls was 12.3%.

Measurement of coagulation, inflammatory and immunology markers

ADAMTS13 activity was measured using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer substrate VWF73 (FRETS-VWF73) as previously described [18]. VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) levels were determined with an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using polyclonal rabbit anti-human VWF antibodies (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) for catching and tagging. Fibrinogen levels were derived from the clotting curve of the prothrombin time assay using Thromborel S as a reagent on an automated coagulation laboratory (ACL 300, Instrumentation Laboratory). In a subset of 1208 participants of RS-I-3, an extended panel of inflammatory and immunology markers was measured as previously described, including complement, immunoglobulins, and cytokines [19].

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), not normally distributed data were presented as median and 25th-75th percentiles. Categorical data were presented as number and percentage. MPO-DNA complex levels were not normally distributed and therefore log-transformed. Differences of MPO-DNA complex levels in different age categories and MPO-DNA complex levels at different time points during the day were analyzed using the Kruskall Wallis-test. Spearman correlation was used to calculate correlations between MPO-DNA complex and clinical characteristics as well as inflammatory markers. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine the association between MPO-DNA complex and demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, cardio-metabolic risk factors, a history of cardiovascular disease and blood markers of inflammation and coagulation) and circadian rhythm of MPO-DNA complex levels. The analyses were repeated after adjustment for age, sex and leukocyte count. Subgroup analysis was performed in different age categories, in men and women separately and in participants with and without the presence of comorbidities, including current smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and a history of CVD. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). All statistical tests were two-tailed and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Age, sex, time point of blood collection and the association with MPO-DNA complex levels

All participants of whom blood samples were available, were included in this study (n = 6449). The median age of the total population was 68.6 years (25th-75th percentile 62.8–75.3 years) and 3633 (56.3%) participants were female (Table 1). Median MPO-DNA complex levels were 53 mAU/mL (42–87). NETs were weakly correlated with age (RS = -0.07, p<0.01, S1 Table in S1 File). We found a weak inverse association of MPO-DNA complex with age (decrease of lnMPO-DNA complex per 10 year increase 0.04 mAU/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06;-0.02, p<0.01) (shown in Table 2 and Fig 1). We found no association between sex and MPO-DNA complex levels. Blood samples were collected between 8 AM and 4 PM on weekdays. There was no significant diurnal variation in MPO-DNA complex levels (S1 Fig in S1 File).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the total cohort.

N = 6449
Age, years 68.6 (62.8–75.3)
Female sex, n (%) 3633 (56.3)
Current smoking, n (%) 1111 (17.2)
BMI, kg/m2 26.9 ± 4.0
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 143.3 ± 21.3
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 76.8 ± 11.3
Hypertension, n (%) 4376 (67.8)
Diabetes Mellitus, n (%) 751 (11.6)
History of CVD, n (%) 623 (9.7)
    • Prevalent CHD 413 (6.4)
    • Prevalent stroke 254 (3.9)
Antithrombotic medication, n (%) 1332 (20.7)
Lipid-reducing agents, n (%) 816 (12.6)
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 5.8 ± 1.0
HDL, mmol/L 1.4 ± 0.4
Glucose, mmol/L 6.0 ± 1.6
CRP, mg/L 1.8 (0.7–3.8)
Leukocytes (*10−9/L) 6.8 ± 1.9
Fibrinogen, g/L 4.0 ± 0.9
Von Willebrand Factor, IU/mL 1.20 (0.93–1.60)
ADAMTS13, % 91.4 ± 19.9
MPO-DNA complex, mAU/mL 53 (42–87)

Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), not normally distributed data are presented as median and 25th-75th percentiles. Categorical data are presented as number and percentage. BMI: body mass index, CVD: cardiovascular disease, CHD: coronary heart disease, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, CRP: C-reactive protein, ADAMTS13: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13.

Table 2. Associations between MPO-DNA complex levels and clinical characteristics.

Univariate mean difference (95% CI) p-value Multivariate Age and sex adjusted mean difference (95% CI) p-value
Age (per 10 years increase) -0.04 (-0.06;-0.02) <0.01 -0.04 (-0.06;-0.02)a <0.01
Sex (male versus female) -0.03 (-0.06;0.01) 0.14 -0.02 (-0.06;0.01)b 0.20
Current smoking (current versus never) -0.03 (-0.07;0.02) 0.27 -0.04 (-0.09;0.01) 0.10
BMI (per 10 kg/m2 increase) 0.03 (-0.02;0.07) 0.25 0.02 (-0.02;0.07) 0.28
Systolic blood pressure (per 10 mmHg increase) -0.01 (-0.02;0.00) 0.06 -0.01 (-0.01;0.00) 0.21
Hypertension -0.04 (-0.08;-0.00) 0.05 -0.02 (-0.06;0.01) 0.22
Diabetes Mellitus -0.01 (-0.03;0.01) 0.23 -0.01 (-0.02;0.01) 0.24
    • History of CVD -0.07 (-0.13;-0.02) 0.01 -0.07 (-0.13;-0.01) 0.02
    • History of CHD -0.10 (-0.17;-0.03) <0.01 -0.11 (-0.18;-0.03) 0.01
History of stroke 0.01 (-0.08;0.10) 0.82 0.03 (-0.06;0.12) 0.57
Antithrombotic medication -0.02 (-0.06;0.02) 0.34 -0.01 (-0.05;0.04) 0.76
Lipid-reducing agents -0.06 (-0.12;-0.01) 0.02 -0.07 (-0.12;-0.02) 0.01
Blood measurements
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) -0.00 (-0.02;0.02) 1.00 0.00 (-0.02;0.02) 0.96
HDL (mmol/L) -0.07 (-0.12;-0.03) <0.01 -0.07 (-0.12;-0.02) 0.01
Glucose (mmol/L) -0.00 (-0.02;0.01) 0.48 -0.00 (-0.02;0.01) 0.48
CRP (mg/L) -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.47 -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.70
Leukocytes (*10−9/L) 0.01 (-0.00;0.02) 0.14 0.01 (-0.00;0.01) 0.31
Fibrinogen (g/L) -0.01 (-0.02;0.01) 0.63 0.00 (-0.02;0.02) 0.81
VWF (IU/mL) -0.00 (-0.03;0.03) 0.84 0.01 (-0.02;0.04) 0.49
ADAMTS13 (%) 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.41 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.78
VWF/ADAMTS13 ratio -1.06 (-3.16;0.65) 0.20 -0.36 (-2.37;1.65) 0.73

aAge adjusted for sex.

bSex adjusted for age. MPO-DNA complex levels were log-transformed. CVD: cardiovascular disease, CHD: coronary heart disease. HDL: high density lipoprotein, CRP: C-reactive protein, VWF: Von Willebrand Factor, ADAMTS13: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13.

Fig 1. Distribution of MPO-DNA complex levels among age categories.

Fig 1

*p<0.01. Data are presented as median and 25th-75th percentiles. Category 55–65 years, (n = 2286) MPO-DNA complex 56 mAU/mL (45–93), category 65–75 years (n = 2467) MPO-DNA complex 53 mAU/mL (41–83), category >75 years (n = 1674) MPO-DNA complex 52 AU/mL (41–81). Differences between age categories were analyzed using the Kruskall–Wallis test with post-hoc analysis.

CVD risk factors and MPO-DNA complex levels

A total of 623 (9.7%) participants had a history of CVD, of whom 413 (6.4%) had coronary heart disease (CHD) and 254 (3.9%) had a stroke (Table 1). Lipid-lowering drugs were used by 815 (12.6%) individuals and antithrombotic medication by 1332 (20.7%). Mean total cholesterol was 5.8 ± 1.0 mmol/L and mean high-density lipoprotein (HDL) was 1.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L. Median MPO-DNA complex levels in presence and absence of CVD risk factors are presented in S2 Table in S1 File. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and a history of CVD were more prevalent in participants aged >75 years than in the other age categories. NETs plasma levels were negatively correlated with hypertension, history of CHD, lipid-lowering drugs and HDL (S1 Table in S1 File). We found a weak inverse association between MPO-DNA complex levels and a history of CHD (β -0.10 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.17;-0.03), the use of lipid-lowering drugs (β -0.06 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.12;-0.01), and HDL (β -0.07 mAU/mL/ mmol/L, 95% CI -0.12;-0.03) (Table 2). Adjustments for age and sex did not change the results. However, when we adjusted for leukocyte count, we found that smoking was weakly associated with MPO-DNA complex levels (β -0.05 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.10;-0.00). In participants in the age category 55–65 years, we found that smoking was weakly associated with MPO-DNA complex (β -0.08 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.15;-0.01). In the age category 65–75 years, the use of lipid-lowering drugs was more important (β -0.09 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.17;-0.01) and in participants >75 years, HDL levels (β -0.12 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.21;-0.04) and a history of CHD (β -0.12 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.23;0.00) were only weak determinants of MPO-DNA complex levels. When analyzing men and women separately, we found that a history of CHD was a weak determinant for MPO-DNA complex levels in men (β -0.14 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.22;-0.05), but not in women (β -0.07 mAU/mL, 95% CI -0.21;0.08). On the other hand, MPO-DNA complex levels were weakly associated with HDL levels in women (β -0.09 mAU/mL/ mmol/L, 95% CI -0.14;-0.03), but not in men (β -0.03 mAU/mL/ mmol/L, 95% CI -0.11;0.05). Subgroup analysis in participants with and without any comorbidities, showed a weak inverse association between MPO-DNA complex levels and age (respectively, difference per 10 year increase -0.03 mAU/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05;-0.00 and difference per 10 year increase -0.07 mAU/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12;-0.02). When we added age, a history of CHD, the use of lipid-lowering drugs and levels of HDL to the same model, all variables remained significant, although the associations were weak.

MPO-DNA complex plasma levels are not associated with inflammatory, immunology and coagulation markers

MPO-DNA complex levels were not associated with levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Von Willebrand Factor (VWF), ADAMTS13, or fibrinogen (Table 2, S1 Table in S1 File). There was a weak correlation between NETs and leukocyte count (Rs = 0.03, p = 0.02). However, in regression analyses, MPO-DNA complex levels were not associated with the concentration of leukocytes (β 0.01 mAU/mL /*10-9/L, 95% CI -0.00–0.02), indicating that the amount of NETs were not influenced by the number of leukocytes. In the exploratory analysis among the subset of 1208 participants in whom an extended panel of inflammatory markers was measured, MPO-DNA complex levels were weakly associated with TNFα (β 0.02 mAU/ml/ pg/mL, 95% CI 0.00–0.04) and IgM (β 0.11 mAU/mL/ g/L, 95% CI 0.05–0.17) (Table 3, S3 Table in S1 File).

Table 3. Associations between MPO-DNA complex and inflammatory and immunology markers in a subset of 1208 individuals of RS-I-3.

Univariate mean difference (95% CI) p-value Multivariate Age and sex adjusted mean difference (95% CI) p-value
Complement factor C3 (g/L) -0.01 (-0.25;0.24) 0.97 -0.00 (-0.25;0.25) 0.98
IgA (g/L) -0.03 (-0.15;0.09) 0.59 -0.02 (-0.15;0.10) 0.75
IgE (g/L) 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.32 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.26
IgM (g/L) 0.11 (0.05;0.17) <0.01 0.11 (0.05;0.17) <0.01
IL-1beta (pg/mL) 0.06 (-0.05;0.16) 0.28 0.06 (-0.04;0.16) 0.26
IL-1ra (pg/mL) -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.85 -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.86
IL-3 (pg/mL) 0.03 (-0.48;0.54) 0.91 0.04 (-0.47;0.55) 0.89
IL-4 (pg/mL) -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.14 -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.15
IL-5 (pg/mL) 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.61 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.60
IL-7 (pg/mL) 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.52 0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.55
IL-8 (pg/mL) 0.00 (-0.00;0.01) 0.53 0.00 (-0.00;0.01) 0.49
IL-10 (pg/mL) -0.00 (-0.01;0.01) 0.90 -0.00 (-0.01;0.01) 0.89
IL-12p70 (pg/mL) 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.04 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.46
IL-13 (pg/mL) -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.19 -0.00 (-0.00;0.00) 0.19
IL-15 (pg/mL) 0.07 (-0.14;0.28) 0.53 0.07 (-0.15;-0.28) 0.54
IL-16 (pg/mL) 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.13 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.10
IL-17 (pg/mL) 0.01 (-0.00;0.02) 0.08 0.01 (-0.00;0.02) 0.07
IL-18 (pg/mL) 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.78 0.00 (0.00;0.00) 0.83
TNFα (pg/mL) 0.02 (0.00;0.04) 0.04 0.02 (0.00;0.04) 0.04

MPO-DNA complex levels were log-transformed. IL: interleukin, Ig: immunoglobulin, TNF: tumor necrosis factor.

Discussion

In this population-based cohort study we found negative associations between MPO-DNA complex levels and age, HDL levels, the use of lipid-lowering drugs and a history of CHD. Although these associations were significant, the effects of these determinants on NETs levels were only mild. We found no associations with markers of inflammation, immunology or coagulation. To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the association between demographic and clinical characteristics and plasma markers of NET formation in the general population.

Although the effect was limited, we observed a small decrease in levels of MPO-DNA complex with advancing age, which was independent of the presence of comorbidities. In previous studies, it has been described that the occurrence of inflammatory diseases promotes NET formation. For instance, higher levels of NETs are found in type 2 diabetes mellitus [20], heart failure [21] and thrombosis [3]. Since the presence of comorbidities increase with age, it would be expected that also NETs levels increase with age. However, in this study we observed the opposite. An age-related decline of NET formation has also been described in several in vivo and in vitro studies. In mice, neutrophils from older mice exposed to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, have lower levels of NETs than neutrophils isolated from young mice [9]. Accordingly, Xu et al. reported lower levels of NETs in aged mice and found that a defect in Atg5-related autophagy may contribute to this decrease [22]. Also in elderly patients with periodontitis, NET formation in neutrophils is lower than in younger controls [10]. It could be that in some diseases the NETs levels indeed increase compared to healthy controls, but that neutrophils lose the ability to form large amounts of NETs with increasing age, irrespective of the presence of comorbidities. It is known that the elderly have an overall increased susceptibility to infection and also have a suboptimal immune response after vaccination [2325]. Immunosenescence is part of the aging process and also effects neutrophil function [26]. Since neutrophil function decreases with age, the formation of NETs could possibly also be decreased.

In this study, we found some weak associations between NETs and CVD risk factors, such as HDL, history of CHD and the use of lipid lowering drugs. The precise mechanisms behind these associations remain unknown. In case of HDL and lipid lowering drugs, a possible anti-inflammatory effect might play a role [27, 28]. In previous studies on patients with CVD, the role of NETs have already been well described. For instance, in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, high NETs levels were associated with major adverse cardiovascular events [4]. Also, in patients with an acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI), NETs are elevated in the acute phase [29]. The main difference between previous studies and our study, is that we measured NETs in a community dwelling population which cannot directly be compared to case-control studies in patients with active or acute disease. In addition, in case-control studies, specific patient groups are selected with certain disease characteristics and disease severities. In this study, such a selection was not present and individuals with minor disease as well as severe disease were all included.

Since CRP is an acute phase protein and a marker of overall inflammation, we expected to find a relation between CRP and MPO-DNA complex levels, but surprisingly found no evidence of this in our population. Although NETs are also formed in several chronic diseases, high amounts of NETs are formed in an acute event [30]. In this first population study on NETs levels, only a small percentage of participants experienced a recent acute event. Most participants were in a steady inflammatory state, as can also be derived from the low CRP levels in this population. This could explain the low levels of MPO-DNA complex in this study. Also, leukocyte counts were not associated with MPO-DNA complex levels. This adds to a previous study performed in patients with an acute ST-elevation MI (STEMI), MPO-DNA complex levels only correlated with the total leukocyte count in the acute phase and not in the stable phase, 3 months after the event [29]. In an extended panel of inflammatory and immunology markers in a subset of participants, we found a positive association with TNFα which is known to be involved in innate immunity, and with an immunoglobulin linked to adaptive immunity (IgM). In a recent systematic review, TNFα was found to function as an inducer of NET formation in five out of seven studies [17]. However, there is no literature on IgM as a potential inducer of NET formation. The underlying mechanism driving the associations between IgM and MPO-DNA complexes, may be the result of neutrophil activation and subsequent initiation of adaptive immunity.

On the basis of prior studies [3, 31], we anticipated to find a link between NET formation and coagulation factors like VWF, ADAMTS13, and fibrinogen. VWF is released from endothelial cells as a result of NETs induced endothelial injury. VWF directly binds to the negatively charged DNA network of the NETs and thereby immobilizes NETs to the vessel wall, while at the same time platelets bind to the NETs and become activated, perpetuating the prothrombotic nature of NETs [3, 31]. One possible explanation for why we found no association with coagulation in our study, is the absence of an acute inflammatory state in this population. According to the ‘immunothrombosis’ hypothesis, NETs activate the coagulation system in response to blood-borne pathogens [32]. These conditions are present in only a small proportion of the general population, as evidenced by the low levels of CRP in our study.

Here, we measured MPO-DNA complex levels as marker for the presence of NETs in plasma. MPO-DNA complex is currently considered the most specific, objective and quantitative assay for monitoring NET formation [33]. These complexes are remnants of NETs and are formed during the process of NET formation, when MPO binds to nuclear DNA and synergizes with neutrophil elastase (NE) in decondensing chromatin [34]. Subsequently, intracellular DNA forms a complex with MPO and other antimicrobial proteins (i.e. NE) and is being released from the neutrophil to form NETs. Besides MPO-DNA complex, another widely used marker for NET formation is citrullinated histone 3 (CitH3). An important step for NET formation is decondensation of chromatin which is promoted by different proteins, including MPO and protein-arginine deiminase type 4 (PAD4) [35]. PAD4 is a nuclear enzyme that citrullinates arginine. CitH3 is a marker of this PAD4-dependent pathway of NET formation. In addition, phosphoinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K) is also required for the formation of NETs, implicating the importance of the autophagy pathway [36]. This is supported by a study in promyelocytes that lack the autophagy-associated protein ATG7, where a decrease in NET release was observed [37]. Where CitH3 is only a marker for the PAD4-dependent pathway of the formation of NETs, MPO-DNA complex also represents the autophagy pathway. In a subset of participants, we measured both MPO-DNA complex and CitH3 to investigate the correlation between the two markers in plasma. However, we found that MPO-DNA complex and CitH3 were not correlated in a small subset of the general population where there is no acute inflammation (S3 Fig in S1 File).

The main strength of this study, is that this is the first study that measured MPO-DNA complex levels in a very large community dwelling population and investigated the association with several known CVD risk factors. Although we were unable to demonstrate a clinical relevant association between NETs and any of the CVD risk factors, the findings of this study are still of importance to identify the role of NETs on population level. A possible limitation of this study is that most participants had very low levels of MPO-DNA complex (<100 mAU/mL). This limited variability might have hampered the identification of determinants of NET formation in this population. Also, the differences in MPO-DNA complex levels between participants with and without prevalent CVD were small. However, in previous studies on CRP levels and the risk of CVD, small elevations in CRP levels within the normal reference range have been shown to be associated with CHD [3840]. Thus, this indicates that low grade inflammation is a risk factor for CHD. We therefore hypothesized that low levels of NETs, within the normal range, may be of biological relevance. Another limitation of this study is the possibility of confounding factors. For this study, we were interested in identifying determinants of NETs levels. When adjusting for possible confounders, there is a risk of over-adjusting, resulting in the inability to identify possible determinants. This in in contrast to studies focusing on disease risk, where it is customary to adjust for possible confounders. Although the associations we found in this study were significant, it is doubtful that these associations are of clinical relevance. This may suggest that NETs are more important in the acute phase of disease than in a steady state situation. Future studies focusing on determining reference values of MPO-DNA complex should be conducted to investigate clinical relevance of given values.

Conclusions

Older age, a history of coronary heart disease, the use of lipid-lowering drugs and higher HDL-cholesterol are weakly correlated with lower plasma levels of NETs. The findings of this study demonstrate that the effect of CVD risk factors on NETs levels in a general population is limited and may not be of clinical relevance. This emphasizes that NETs may play a more important role in an acute phase of disease than in a steady state situation.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supplemental tables and figures.

S1 Table. Correlations between MPO-DNA complex and clinical characteristics. S2 Table. MPO-DNA complex levels in CVD risk factors. S3 Table. Correlations between MPO-DNA complex and inflammatory and immunology markers in a subset of 1208 individuals of RS-I-3. S1 Fig. Circadian rhythm of MPO-DNA complex levels during daytime. S2 Fig. Typical example of a reference curve used for MPO-DNA complex ELISA. S3 Fig. Correlation between MPO-DNA complex and citrullinated histone H3.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge J.W.R van Soerland and F. Dik for their excellent help with the measurement of MPO-DNA complex. The contribution of inhabitants, general practitioners and pharmacists of the Ommoord district to the Rotterdam Study is gratefully acknowledged.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The Rotterdam Study is supported by the Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Erasmus University Rotterdam; The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO); The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE); The Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI); the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports; the European Commission (DG XII); and the Municipality of Rotterdam. We acknowledge the support of the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative which is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (CVON2015-01: CONTRAST), the support of the Brain Foundation Netherlands (HA2015.01.06), and the support of Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (LSHM17016), Medtronic and Cerenovus. The collaboration project is additionally financed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs by means of the PPP Allowance made available by the Top Sector Life Sciences & Health to stimulate public-private partnerships. The measurement of MPO-DNA complex levels in participants of the Rotterdam study was supported by a research grant (Prof. Heimburger Award 2018, CSL Behring). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Mantovani A, Cassatella MA, Costantini C, Jaillon S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:519–31. doi: 10.1038/nri3024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303:1532–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD, Jr., et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15880–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Borissoff JI, Joosen IA, Versteylen MO, Brill A, Fuchs TA, Savchenko AS, et al. Elevated levels of circulating DNA and chromatin are independently associated with severe coronary atherosclerosis and a prothrombotic state. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:2032–40. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Camicia G, Pozner R, de Larranaga G. Neutrophil extracellular traps in sepsis. Shock. 2014;42:286–94. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoppenbrouwers T, Boeddha NP, Ekinci E, Emonts M, Hazelzet JA, Driessen GJ, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Children With Meningococcal Sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19:e286–e91. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stakos DA, Kambas K, Konstantinidis T, Mitroulis I, Apostolidou E, Arelaki S, et al. Expression of functional tissue factor by neutrophil extracellular traps in culprit artery of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1405–14. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laridan E, Denorme F, Desender L, Francois O, Andersson T, Deckmyn H, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemic stroke thrombi. Ann Neurol. 2017;82:223–32. doi: 10.1002/ana.24993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tseng CW, Kyme PA, Arruda A, Ramanujan VK, Tawackoli W, Liu GY. Innate immune dysfunctions in aged mice facilitate the systemic dissemination of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hazeldine J, Harris P, Chapple IL, Grant M, Greenwood H, Livesey A, et al. Impaired neutrophil extracellular trap formation: a novel defect in the innate immune system of aged individuals. Aging Cell. 2014;13:690–8. doi: 10.1111/acel.12222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fadini GP, Menegazzo L, Scattolini V, Gintoli M, Albiero M, Avogaro A. A perspective on NETosis in diabetes and cardiometabolic disorders. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tillack K, Naegele M, Haueis C, Schippling S, Wandinger KP, Martin R, et al. Gender differences in circulating levels of neutrophil extracellular traps in serum of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;261:108–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hofman A, Breteler MM, van Duijn CM, Krestin GP, Pols HA, Stricker BH, et al. The Rotterdam Study: objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:819–29. doi: 10.1007/s10654-007-9199-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ligthart S, van Herpt TT, Leening MJ, Kavousi M, Hofman A, Stricker BH, et al. Lifetime risk of developing impaired glucose metabolism and eventual progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:44–51. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00362-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leening MJ, Kavousi M, Heeringa J, van Rooij FJ, Verkroost-van Heemst J, Deckers JW, et al. Methods of data collection and definitions of cardiac outcomes in the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:173–85. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9668-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bos MJ, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Ikram MA. Modifiable etiological factors and the burden of stroke from the Rotterdam study: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoppenbrouwers T, Autar ASA, Sultan AR, Abraham TE, van Cappellen WA, Houtsmuller AB, et al. In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kokame K, Nobe Y, Kokubo Y, Okayama A, Miyata T. FRETS-VWF73, a first fluorogenic substrate for ADAMTS13 assay. Br J Haematol. 2005;129:93–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05420.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brahimaj A, Ligthart S, Ghanbari M, Ikram MA, Hofman A, Franco OH, et al. Novel inflammatory markers for incident pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32:217–26. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0236-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Menegazzo L, Ciciliot S, Poncina N, Mazzucato M, Persano M, Bonora B, et al. NETosis is induced by high glucose and associated with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:497–503. doi: 10.1007/s00592-014-0676-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vulesevic B, Lavoie SS, Neagoe PE, Dumas E, Rakel A, White M, et al. CRP Induces NETosis in Heart Failure Patients with or without Diabetes. Immunohorizons. 2019;3:378–88. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1900026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu F, Zhang C, Zou Z, Fan EKY, Chen L, Li Y, et al. Aging-related Atg5 defect impairs neutrophil extracellular traps formation. Immunology. 2017;151:417–32. doi: 10.1111/imm.12740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gardner ID. The effect of aging on susceptibility to infection. Rev Infect Dis. 1980;2:801–10. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.5.801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kline KA, Bowdish DM. Infection in an aging population. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;29:63–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Siegrist CA, Aspinall R. B-cell responses to vaccination at the extremes of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:185–94. doi: 10.1038/nri2508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Drew W, Wilson DV, Sapey E. Inflammation and neutrophil immunosenescence in health and disease: Targeted treatments to improve clinical outcomes in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2018;105:70–7. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Effect of inflammation on HDL structure and function. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016;27:521–30. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosenson RS, Tangney CC, Casey LC. Inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine production by pravastatin. Lancet. 1999;353:983–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05917-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Helseth R, Knudsen EC, Eritsland J, Opstad TB, Arnesen H, Andersen GO, et al. Glucose associated NETosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:221. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1205-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Castanheira FVS, Kubes P. Neutrophils and NETs in modulating acute and chronic inflammation. Blood. 2019;133:2178–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grassle S, Huck V, Pappelbaum KI, Gorzelanny C, Aponte-Santamaria C, Baldauf C, et al. von Willebrand factor directly interacts with DNA from neutrophil extracellular traps. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1382–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.303016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Engelmann B, Massberg S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:34–45. doi: 10.1038/nri3345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Masuda S, Nakazawa D, Shida H, Miyoshi A, Kusunoki Y, Tomaru U, et al. NETosis markers: Quest for specific, objective, and quantitative markers. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;459:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:677–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rohrbach AS, Slade DJ, Thompson PR, Mowen KA. Activation of PAD4 in NET formation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:360. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Remijsen Q, Vanden Berghe T, Wirawan E, Asselbergh B, Parthoens E, De Rycke R, et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap cell death requires both autophagy and superoxide generation. Cell Res. 2011;21:290–304. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma R, Li T, Cao M, Si Y, Wu X, Zhao L, et al. Extracellular DNA traps released by acute promyelocytic leukemia cells through autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2283. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Timpson NJ, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Gaunt TR, et al. The association of C-reactive protein and CRP genotype with coronary heart disease: findings from five studies with 4,610 cases amongst 18,637 participants. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xie M, Xie D, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Li K, Zhou B, et al. Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in middle-aged and elderly Chinese people with hyperuricaemia and risk of coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhuang Q, Shen C, Chen Y, Zhao X, Wei P, Sun J, et al. Association of high sensitive C-reactive protein with coronary heart disease: a Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med Genet. 2019;20:170. doi: 10.1186/s12881-019-0910-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Pablo Garcia de Frutos

26 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-40069

Circulating neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) levels and cardiovascular risk factors in the general population

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Donkel,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Two experts in the field have reviewed the study that, while considering the interesting results provided, find that the conclusions are only partly supported by the data. In part, this is attributed to the fact that studying the general population, no strong association is to be expected. As indicated by one of the reviewers, this fact should be used as both a limitation and a strength of the study. In general, the discussion seems to be unnecessarily long. The authors should indicate in the title that the study measures MPO-DNA.  As this is a surrogate marker of NETosis and not a direct measurement of NETs, the title could be misleading.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 09 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Pablo Garcia de Frutos

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

3. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

4. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

5. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

'The Rotterdam Study is supported by the Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Erasmus University Rotterdam; The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO); The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE); The Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI); the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports; the European Commission (DG XII); and the Municipality of Rotterdam. We acknowledge the support of the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative which is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (CVON2015-01: CONTRAST), the support of the Brain Foundation Netherlands (HA2015.01.06), and the support of Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (LSHM17016), Medtronic and Cerenovus . The collaboration project is additionally financed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs by means of the PPP Allowance made available by the Top Sector Life Sciences & Health to stimulate public-private partnerships. The measurement of MPO-DNA complex levels in participants of the Rotterdam study was supported by a research grant (Prof. Heimburger Award 2018, CSL Behring).'             

a. Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

b. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

6. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

'The Rotterdam Study is supported by the Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Erasmus University Rotterdam; The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO); The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE); The Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI); the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports; the European Commission (DG XII); and the Municipality of Rotterdam. We acknowledge the support of the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative which is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (CVON2015-01: CONTRAST), the support of the Brain Foundation Netherlands (HA2015.01.06), and the support of Health~Holland, Top Sector Life Sciences & Health (LSHM17016), Medtronic and Cerenovus. The collaboration project is additionally financed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs by means of the PPP Allowance made available by the Top Sector Life Sciences & Health to stimulate public-private partnerships. The measurement of MPO-DNA complex levels in participants of the Rotterdam study was supported by a research grant (Prof. Heimburger Award 2018, CSL Behring).'

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: Health-Holland, Medtronic and Cerenovus

a. Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

b.Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this study, the authors aimed to assess whereas neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is associated with demographic and/or cardiovascular risk factors in general population. NETs were quantified by measuring MPO-DNA complex using an ELISA. The results showed that MPO-DNA complex levels were lower with advancing age, a history of coronary heart disease, the use of lipid-lowering drugs and higher HDL-cholesterol. Although the pathophysiologic hypothesis is intriguing, this reviewer has some concerns:

- The differences in MPO-DNA complex levels between subjects with and without cardiovascular risk factors were very small and the biological and clinical relevance seems forced.

- In the Methods section, the definition of cardiovascular risk factors seems partial and incomplete, mainly for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. The pharmacological therapy was only partially considered and the definition of “coronary heart disease” seems insufficient.

- The model used for multivariable regression analysis only contemplate age and sex adjustment while other variables with a p value <0.1 at univariable analysis were not considered. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in MPO-DNA complex levels between male and female at univariate analysis.

- The discussion paragraph is too long. The argument is complex and sometimes farfetched and vulnerable.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, Donkel et al. evaluated the levels of NETs in a large cohort from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. The authors investigated the association between NET levels, measured by MPO-DNA ELISA, and different clinical, biochemical, cellular and inflammatory parameters. The study is certainly of interest given that this kind of study is missing and may give important answers on NET pathophysiology.

The main criticism that I have is on how the results are presented. The authors should be cautious with the conclusions. All the correlations are at most weak (max Rs is 0.11!) and the majority are very weak (<0.1). Thus, as the authors pointed it out in the limitation section, the biological, pathophysiological, and clinical relevance of these associations are very difficult to establish. The presence of confounding variables adds additional difficulty to interpret data.

The authors should not be scared to present the manuscript focusing on that NETs are not or very weakly associated with the different parameters since this study is very informative regarding a healthy population. In this sense, the abstract gives a message that is not conveyed once the manuscript is read. In particular, the conclusions of the abstract and of the manuscript should be rephrased and soften. The discussion should be reduced since several very weak associations do not need so much discussion.

This work has to show its strengths, that are the casuistic and the large amount of parameters to perform the statistics. The authors may give conclusions concerning the lack of associations more than the presence of associations between NETs and different parameters.

Beside this main concern, other minor points should be attended:

• Pleas e check for typo errors (e.g. line 117: phorbol 12-myristaat 13-acetaat)

• The concentration of PMA used to activate NETosis has to be indicated in M&M

• Line 191, please add the reference to Figure 1

• Line 313. Authors should moderate the sentence given that other studies have shown a correlation between MPO/DNA and cfDNA (e.g. 31119471 (septic patients), 32329756 (Covid-19))

• Line 326. This result is important and should be shown.

• Significant correlations have to be shown in a graph.

• How do the authors explain the lower levels of NETs in older subjects? Can this be associated with drug intake that can be higher in older vs younger individuals?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Pablo Garcia de Frutos

11 Jun 2021

Circulating Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes as marker for neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) levels and the association with cardiovascular risk factors in the general population

PONE-D-20-40069R1

Dear Dr. Donkel,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Pablo Garcia de Frutos

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript has been somewhat improved.

Despite some limitations and its weak results, the study remains of scientific interest.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Pablo Garcia de Frutos

2 Aug 2021

PONE-D-20-40069R1

Circulating Myeloperoxidase (MPO)-DNA complexes as marker for neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) levels and the association with cardiovascular risk factors in the general population

Dear Dr. Donkel:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Pablo Garcia de Frutos

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Supplemental tables and figures.

    S1 Table. Correlations between MPO-DNA complex and clinical characteristics. S2 Table. MPO-DNA complex levels in CVD risk factors. S3 Table. Correlations between MPO-DNA complex and inflammatory and immunology markers in a subset of 1208 individuals of RS-I-3. S1 Fig. Circadian rhythm of MPO-DNA complex levels during daytime. S2 Fig. Typical example of a reference curve used for MPO-DNA complex ELISA. S3 Fig. Correlation between MPO-DNA complex and citrullinated histone H3.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to the reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES