Abstract
Methyltransferase like 13 (METTL13), a kind of methyltransferase, is implicated in protein binding and synthesis. The upregulation of METTL13 has been reported in a variety of tumors. However, little was known about its potential function in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) so far. In this study, we found that METTL13 was significantly upregulated in HNSCC at both mRNA and protein level. Increased METTL13 was negatively associated with clinical prognosis. And METTL13 markedly affected HNSCC cellular phenotypes in vivo and vitro. Further mechanism study revealed that METTL13 could regulate EMT signaling pathway by mediating enhancing translation efficiency of Snail, the key transcription factor in EMT, hence regulating the progression of EMT. Furthermore, Snail was verified to mediate METTL13-induced HNSCC cell malignant phenotypes. Altogether, our study had revealed the oncogenic role of METTL13 in HNSCC, and provided a potential therapeutic strategy.
Subject terms: Head and neck cancer, Prognostic markers
Introduction
Human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most diagnosed malignancies worldwide with high mortality and morbidity, making it a growing health burden1,2. And this highly malignant disease is characterized by poor prognosis due to its high local recurrence and lymph node metastasis3. As for the metastasis of malignant tumor, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) was a crucial part4,5. It was activated in tumor progression6,7 and affected cancer stem cell (CSC) cellular behaviors8,9. During EMT, a small subset of cancer cells acquires motility with decreased adhesive ability and obtains invasive properties. Several EMT-induced transcription factors, such as Slug, Twist, and Snail, have been involved in the progress10. Specifically, Snail, a major transcription factor governing EMT, equips cancer cells with malignant phenotypes such as tumor recurrence and metastasis. Furthermore, although many of the signaling pathways could impinge on the transcriptional regulation of the Snail gene11, posttranscriptional mechanisms affecting Snail are also emerging as crucial regulators of its activity12.
Especially, aberrant regulation of mRNA translation to protein often accounts for the progression of cancer13. For instance, the subunits of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F complex and eukaryotic elongation factor 2 were frequently found to be dysregulated in multiple cancer types14,15. Increased activities of translation regulators enable the cancer cells to rapidly produce selective proteins in response to cancer development. For example, eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 2 can mediate the expression of EMT factor matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) in pancreatic cancer16. In addition, chemical modification of translation regulators by phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and ubiquitination can result in changes of translation efficiency. For instance, phosphorylation of eIF2a leads to the gene-specific translation, which further support cell survival in human cancers17,18.
Recently, studies reported that human methyltransferase like 13 (METTL13) can catalyze demethylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) lysine 55 (eEF1AK55me2) to promote the protein synthesis in Ras-driven cancers19,20. METTL13 was characterized with oncogenicity, as it was involved in various diseases, such as gastric cancer21, lung cancer22,23, and breast cancer24. METTL13 also functions as a potential inhibitor of apoptosis, for it was found that miR-16 promoted apoptosis of tumor cells by silencing protein synthesis through posttranscriptional regulation25. Collectively, these findings suggest that METTL13 could be a crucial gene of tumorigenesis and development.
In the present study, we examined the expression of METTL13 in paired HNSCC and para-carcinoma samples, and found METTL13 was significantly increased in HNSCC. Further study confirmed it was related to overall survival. And METTL13 knockdown significantly inhibits the proliferation and induced apoptosis in vitro. Conversely, the overexpression of METTL13 can promote malignant phenotypes of tumor. By RNA-seq, we figured out that METTL13 regulated the EMT pathway. In terms of mechanism, we managed to demonstrate that METTL13 could enhance translation efficiency of Snail, the key factor in EMT, hence regulating the progression of EMT. Therefore, our data revealed the function and underlying mechanism of METTL13 in HNSCC, providing both a prognostic marker and drug candidate for this malignancy.
Results
METTL13 expression was upregulated in HNSCC and negatively correlated with clinical survival
To investigate the expression pattern of METTL13 in HNSCC, we firstly analyzed its mRNA expression level by qPCR in 67 HNSCC and paired para-carcinoma tissues obtained from Hospital of Stomatology of Sun Yat-sen University. Notably, significant upregulation of METTL13 was observed (P < 0.001, Fig. 1a). Consistently, TCGA analysis data also showed that METTL13 was upregulated in the HNSCC samples (Fig. 1b). In addition, upregulation of METTL13 in HNSCC patients was significantly associated with the clinical indexes including lymph node metastasis and histopathological grading (Fig. 1c, d). Next, we examined the METTL13 expression at protein level by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Higher expression of METTL13 was observed in human HNSCC samples than paired normal tissues (Fig. 1e). To further explore the potential prognostic value in HNSCC, a total of 44 patients were segmented into METTL13 low and high expression groups based on the qPCR results. The data showed METTL13 significantly negatively correlated with overall survival of HNSCC patients (P < 0.05, Fig. 1f). Collectively, we showed that the expression of METTL13 was upregulated in HNSCC, and it might play a key role in HNSCC development and progression.
Knockdown of METTL13 inhibited HNSCC cell malignant phenotypes in vitro
Aberrant cellular activities often occur in cancer cells, such as continuous proliferative, evading growth inhibition, resisting cell apoptosis, and active invasion and metastasis26. To explore the functional role of METTL13 in HNSCC cells, we first selected six HNSCC cell lines and compared their METTL13 expression by the western blotting assay (Fig. 2a). The results revealed higher METTL13 protein level in two HNSCC cancer cell lines (SCC9 and SCC15) and lower METTL13 protein level in SCC1 cell line (Fig. 2a). Hence, we chose SCC9, SCC15, and SCC1 cell lines for further functional study. We then generated stable METTL13-knockdown SCC9 and SCC15 cell lines using shRNA targeting METTL13 and confirmed the successful knockdown of METTL13 gene at protein and mRNA levels (Fig. 2b, c). Next, we performed clone formation assay and CCK-8 assay to explore the effect of METTL13 gene knockdown on the proliferation in HNSCC cell lines. The results showed that the depletion of METTL13 significantly not only inhibited the clone formation ability but also inhibited cell growth rate in these two cell lines (Fig. 2d, e). Next, we utilized a flow cytometer to study the role of METTL13 in cell apoptosis. Our results demonstrated a higher apoptosis rate after ablation of METTL13 in HNSCC cells (Fig. 2f). Subsequently, wound-healing assay results revealed that silencing of METTL13 significantly suppressed cell migration and prolonged the repair time (Fig. 2g). Transwell cell migration assay further proved knockdown of METTL13 attenuated the metastasizing ability of HNSCC cells (Fig. 2h). Taken together, these results demonstrated that METTL13 is critical for proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of HNSCC cell lines.
METTL13 downregulation negatively correlates with HNSCC CSC-like properties
We also investigated whether METTL13 played a role in HNSCC CSCs like properties. First, we determined HNSCC cellular self-renewal capacity by conducting the sphere-forming assay. Downregulation of METTL13 greatly reduced the size and number of tumor spheres when compared with those formed by control cells in both SCC9 and SCC15 cell lines (Fig. 3a, b), indicating that their ability to self-renew was impaired. We then further assessed the CSC-like properties of METTL13 using assay to detect aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, which was regarded as a reliable marker for CSCs27. As shown in Fig. 3c, d, ALDH activity was significantly reduced in cells treated with sh-METTL13. Therefore, METTL13 played an essential part in maintaining HNSCC cells self-renewal ability.
Overexpression of METTL13 could promote HNSCC tumorigenicity
To further explore the function of METTL13 in HNSCC, a stable METTL13 overexpression SCC1 cell line was generated. The upregulation efficiency was verified by western blotting and qPCR assays (Fig. 4a, b). The CCK-8 assay revealed overexpression of METTL13 remarkably increased the capacity of HNSCC cells to proliferate (Fig. 4c). Next, we found that extra acquisition of METTL13 could accelerate cell migration of SCC1 in the transwell assay (Fig. 4d). Consistently, lower rate of apoptotic cells was captured in METTL13over group by the flow cytometry (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, METTL13over group tended to form larger size of tumor spheres after having cultured for 7 days (Fig. 4f). On the other hand, overexpression of METTL13 endowed SCC1 cells with higher ALDH activities (Fig. 4g). To sum up, these data show that METTL13 plays a potential oncogenic role by increasing or inducing the malignant proliferation, migration, and CSC-like properties in HNSCC cells.
METTL13-regulated EMT signaling pathway by enhancing translation efficiency of Snail to facilitate HNSCC progress
We have demonstrated that METTL13 expressly promoted HNSCC proliferation and metastasis, but the specific mechanism was unclear. Previous studies have reported that METTL13-mediated methylation of eEF1A promotes oncogenesis via increased translation elongation and protein synthesis in cancer cells19. And indeed, our polysome profile assay results revealed that decrease of METTL13 suppressed total protein translation in HNSCC cell (Fig. 5a). In addition, the surface sensing of translation (SUnSET) monitoring method confirmed protein synthesis was inhibited after METTL13 depletion (Fig. 5b).
Previous study has indicated that METTL13 is involved in RAS-driven cancer development, we wonder whether depletion of METTL13 in HNSCC is also related to RAS signaling pathway19. Therefore, RNA sequencing was performed using the METTL13 control and knockdown groups in both SCC9 and SCC15 cell lines. Interestingly, results from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) indicated that EMT signaling pathway was significantly negatively correlated with the downregulation of METTL13 in HNSCC cell lines (Fig. 5c), suggesting that downregulation of protein synthesis might prone to EMT-related factors. To examine whether this is the case, a series of key proteins associated with EMT pathway were examined by western blotting (Fig. 5d, data not shown). Notably, as a key transcription factor in EMT, Snail was significantly downregulated in METTL13-deficient cells (Fig. 5d). Therefore, we hypothesized that METTL13 could regulate EMT signaling pathway by regulating the translation activity of Snail mRNA. To test that, we performed polysome profile assay using sucrose gradient centrifugation to separate the ribosome and polysome segments. Based on these results, we used qPCR to detect the distribution of METTL13 affected mRNAs in the polysome segment. And the results showed Snail mRNA was significantly downregulated in the METTL13-deficient groups in the polysome levels (Fig. 5e), indicating that the METTL13 is required for translation of Snail, which consistent with our previous conjecture. Altogether our results support that Snail is involved in METTL13-regulated EMT in HNSCC, and METTL13-regulated EMT signaling pathway by enhancing translation efficiency of Snail.
Decreased METTL13 expression weakened malignant phenotypes in vivo
Xenograft studies were then conducted to investigate whether METTL13 could recapitulate the in vitro malignant phenotypes in vivo. Control and two METTL13 shRNA SCC15 cell lines were subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Mice were sacrificed after 4 weeks. In accordance with our in vitro results, deficiency of METTL13 in SCC15 cell dramatically suppressed tumor growth when compared with the control in vivo (Fig. 6a). And the tumor volume and tumor weight results further confirmed this effect (Fig. 6b, c). In order to get a more profound understanding of the function of METTL13 in vivo, we obtain the tumor sections. Next, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and METTL13 IHC results verified that METTL13 expression was decreased in sh-METTL13 tumor cells compared to the control (Fig. 6d, e). The staining of Ki67, a proliferation marker, showed alleviated cell growth after METTL13 gene knockdown, which was consistent with in vitro results (Fig. 6e). Consistently, IHC staining of nude mice showed the expression of Snail protein was reduced by the silencing of METTL13 (Fig. 6e). Collectively, these data demonstrated that METTL13 is required for tumorigenic ability of HNSCC cells in vivo.
METTL13 promotes the progression of HNSCC by targeting Snail
We have found that METTL13 promoted the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of HNSCC cells in vitro and in vivo via regulating the EMT pathway and Snail was the downstream candidate. To further investigate whether Snail was the main downstream mediator of METTL13, we overexpressed Snail in both control and METTL13-knockdown cells (Fig. 7a). Clone formation assay and CCK-8 assay showed that overexpression of Snail could significantly rescue the clone formation ability and cell proliferation inhibited by METTL13 knockdown (Fig. 7b, c). Consistently, the higher apoptosis rate of HNSCC cells caused by inhibiting METTL13 was rescued by Snail overexpression (Fig. 7d). Meanwhile, the transwell assay demonstrated inhibition on HNSCC cells migration by ablation of METTL13 was weakened in Snail overexpressing cells (Fig. 7e). In addition, Snail also significantly rescued the sphere formation ability in SCC9 and SCC15 cell lines after METTL13 was downregulated (Fig. 7f). In summary, these results indicated that Snail functions as an effector in METTL13 induced promotion of progression in HNSCC.
Discussion
Translation is one of the most energy consumption processes inside the cell and dysregulation of translation mechanisms is a common cause of neoplastic diseases28,29. Because in cancer cells where mRNA translation is usually highly active, it is necessary to increase the rate of protein synthesis14. And increasing evidences revealed translation elongation factor modification could cause promotion or inhibition of protein synthesis30–33. In our study, we demonstrated that METTL13, a regulator of translation elongation, showed higher expression levels in HNSCC tumors than adjacent normal tissues and might serve as a prognostic marker for overall survival in HNSCC patients.
METTL13 has been reported to be involved in cell apoptosis, stem cell biology, and various cell signal and metabolic pathways34. However, whether it participates in tumorigenesis activity in HNSCC remains largely elusive. Here, we documented a detailed oncogenic role of METTL13 in HNSCC cell lines. We found that METTL13 is necessary and required for proliferation and EMT of HNSCC cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. The translation level of METTL13-depleted HNSCC cells underwent significantly decrease compared with control cells. Intriguingly, GESA analysis of the transcriptome showed that genes downregulated in the METTL13-depleted HNSCC are related to EMT process. Previously, METTL13 has been shown to promote cell proliferation and metastasis by elevating the levels of TCF3 and ZEB in hepatocellular carcinoma35. In addition, METTL13 can participate in development of Ras-dependent epithelial tumors of the pancreas and lung19. In HNSCC, we found depletion of METTL13 profoundly reduced the protein level of Snail, one of the key transcription factors of EMT. More specifically, we demonstrated that METTL13 could enhance the translation efficiency of Snail mRNA to promote EMT and HNSCC progression. It is highly possible that the inhibition of the metastatic ability of cancer cells after deletion of METTL3 may be mitigated by Snail’s overexpression. Moreover, the present study found that the Snail served as a necessary effector of oncogene function of METTL13 in HNSCC. Previous studies revealed that EMT could be utilized by the tumor cells to perform metastatic cascades7,36, and scientific groups began to work on the its underlying mechanisms in tumor progression. In one study, EMT signaling pathway was blocked through modulation of the key protein translation in breast cancer37. Thereby, our study provided a more profound understanding of EMT in HNSCC.
In conclusion, our data revealed the tumor promoter function of METTL13 in HNSCC. METTL13 could regulate the progression of EMT by promoting Snail mRNA translation. These results suggested that METTL13 might function as a promising drug target. METTL13 could regulate the translation of downstream proteins by affecting the stability of 80S ribosome structure. Although deeper researches are needed to uncover the mechanism of METTL13 carcinogenesis and as a drug target for HNSCC in the future, our present research has built the foundation for better therapeutic strategies.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and patient samples
SCC9, SCC15, and SCC1 cell lines were obtained from Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Shanghai, China. And all the cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, 11885-076) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, 10270-106) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco, 15140122) at a 37 °C incubator containing 5% CO2.
Both HNSCC tissues and adjacent tissues were collected from HNSCC patients who underwent surgery at the Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University. This study received the informed written consent from all patients before the experiment.
Cell transfection
METTL13 gene expression was inhibited by two sequences of shRNAs, shRNA-1: AATGTGGACCTTCATTCGGTC and shRNA-2: TTGTGAGACACATCCTTCAGC. The synthesized and purified METTL13 gene and control fragment were imported into a lentivirus vector. And recombinant lentivirus was produced from 293T cells by LipofectamineTM 2000 transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11668019), and transfected into HNSCC cell lines by polybrene (8 μgmL−1). And pFLAG-CMV2-METTL13 plasmid and puro-Snail plasmid were used for overexpression of METTL13 and Snail.
Total RNA extraction and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR
The total RNA of cells was obtained according to the instructions provided by the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, 15596026). Next, TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq II kit (Takara, RR820B) was used for real-time PCR according to the instructions and operated under the Bio-Rad CXF96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, USA). β-actin functioned as an internal control to calculate the relative quantity. The primers pair used for real-time PCR was as follows: METTL13 (forward): 5′-CAGGAGGTTGATTACAGTGG-3′; METTL13 (reverse): 5′-CTCCATGACTCTAGCCGACA-3′. β-actin (forward): 5′-GATCATTGCTCCTCCTGAGC-3′; β-actin (reverse): 5′-ACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCAC-3′. Snail1 (forward): 5′-TGCCCTCAAGATGCACATCCGA-3′; Snail1 (reverse): 5′-GGGACAGGAGAAGGGCTTCTC-3′.
Total protein extraction and western blotting analysis
The total protein of HNSCC cell lines was harvested with ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis solution. And the cell protein component was isolated by 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to the polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Germany). Enhanced chemiluminescence reagents were used to detect the protein antibody complexes. And the following primary antibodies were used: Snail (Cell Signaling Technology, 3879T), Twist (Cell Signaling Technology, 46702S), Slug (Cell Signaling Technology, 9585T), MMP7 (Abcam, ab216631-100 µL), MMP9 (Abcam, ab74277-100 µL), E-cadherin (Affinity, AF0131-100), N-cadherin (Affinity, AF4039-50 µL), vimentin (Abcam, ab24525-50 µL), beta-catenin (Affinity, AF6679-100), and METTL13 (GeneTex, GTX120626-S). GADPH (Proteintech, 10494-1-AP) was served as internal control.
Colony formation assay
Two-hundred cells were added into six-well plates and were cultivated for about 2 weeks. Cells were fixed for 30 min after 14 days with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% violet crystal. Each group had been repeated in triplicate.
Cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation ability was assessed via CCK-8 assay (Dojindo, CCK8-500). According to the standard procedure, 100 μL cell suspension containing 2 × 103 cells was seeded into each well of the 96-well plate and cultured in a cell incubator. At equal time intervals (four times every 24 h), 10 μL reaction agent was added to each well and cultured for 1 h at 37 °C, and then taken out for absorbance value detection at 450 nm (Infinite 200 PRO).
Wound-healing and cell migration assay
For the wound-healing experiment, cells were transplanted and grown until they developed a monolayer of 90% fusion. Cells were then removed with the tip of an aseptic straw and treated in FBS-free medium according to the instructions. The scratched visual field was randomly selected under the microscope, and the migration distance of the cells to the scratched area was measured.
Transwell system was utilized for migration analysis. And DMEM containing 10% FBS was served as a chemical inducer. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 30 min after 18 h of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were stained with crystal violet after rinsing with PBS and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. The cells on the cell culture insert’s upper side were erased with a cotton swab, and washed thoroughly with PBS. The average number of cells was calculated according to the random visual field. Each sample was counted for three chambers.
Flow cytometric analysis of annexin V apoptosis
Cell apoptosis rate was detected using flow cytometry as per the annexin V apoptosis detection kit (Dojindo, AD10) instructions. HNSCC cell lines were transplanted into six-well plates (1 × 105 mL−1 per well) for apoptosis analysis and cultivated at 37 °C for 48 h in complete medium. Cells were then harvested and stained with the kit after the treatment with non-EDTA trypsin. Cell apoptosis assay was performed on a flow cytometer with BD FACSDiva software 6.0 (BD Biosciences, New York, NY, USA). All the experiments were repeated at least three times.
Flow cytometric analysis of ALDH activity assay
ALDH activity assay was conducted by the ALDEFLUOR fluorescence reagent system (Stem Cell Technology, 01700). In short, we labeled each sample with a test tube and a control tube. The cells were lysed and collected into the test tube and activated ALDEFLUOR reagent was added to each cell suspension. Half of the cell fluid in the test tube was added to the control tube, 5 μL diethylaminobenzaldehyde was immediately added to the control tube, and then the fluid was incubated at 37 °C for 45 min and centrifuged. Then, the supernatant was removed and resuspended in the determination buffer. Finally, the analysis was performed on the flow cytometry.
IHC staining and H&E staining
IHC and H&E staining procedure had been described previously38. All the primary antibodies including METTL13 (GeneTex, GTX120626-S), Snail (Cell Signaling Technology, 3879T), and Ki67 (Affinity, AF0198) were used at dilution in 1:100. IHC staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (medium), or 3 (strong). And IHC score was defined by multiplying the percentage of positive cells (P) by the intensity (I), formula: Q = P × I; maximum = 300.
RNA sequencing
SCC9 and SCC15 cells transfected with shCtrl, shRNA-1, and shRNA-2 were sent for RNA sequencing. Briefly, the total RNA was extracted using TRIzol as mentioned previously. RNA quality and purity were checked by Nano 300.
SUnSET assay
As for translation analysis, the cells were incubated with puromycin (Beyotime, ST551-50 mg) of 1 µmol · L−1 final concentration at 37 °C for 30 min. After that the cells were collected and lysed in RIPA buffer containing with 1 mmol · L−1 PMSF and protease inhibitor. The whole cell lysate of 5–10 μg was detected by western blotting with anti-puromycin primary antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, MABE343).
Polysome profiling and fractionation
Polysome profiling assay was conducted as described previously39. In short, cells with control or METTL13 decreased were cultured in 15 cm dishes (about 1 × 107 cells in each dish). Then, cells were loaded with actinomycin at 100 μg · mL−1, then incubated for 2 min at 37 °C. Then, cells were collected and cell extract was loaded on a sucrose gradient of 10–50% and prepared with a BioComp gradient station. The gradient was rotated at 36 000 r · min−1 and 4 °C for 2 h in the TH-641 rotor (Sorvall). The gradient (260 nm) was analyzed and the components were collected by the BioComp gradient station.
Sphere formation assays
According to the method we used before40, the stem cell culture medium containing 3 × 103 cells per mL will be put into the six-well ultralow attachment plates, and will be incubated for 7–10 days in a 37 °C incubator containing 5% CO2. The stem cell culture medium was replaced every 2 days. After spheres were formed, they were digested into single sphere by 0.25% trypsin-EDTA. Photographs and counts were taken under a microscope.
Animal studies
For the in vivo subcutaneous transplanted model studies, 4-week-old BALB/C female nude mice obtained from Center of Experimental Animal of Sun Yat-sen University were divided into three groups (n = 6 per group) randomly. HNSCC cell lines transfected with METTL13-deficient or control plasmid were subcutaneously injected into mice to explore the effect in vivo. After 4 weeks, all the mice were sacrificed and we resected xenograft tumors intactly. The volume of transplanted tumor volume was determined as follows: length × width2/2.
Statistical analysis
The experiments had been replicated at least three times. The sample size necessary for vivo studies to discern difference in statistical significance is at least six animals in each group.
Data were shown as mean ± SD. All the mathematical analysis of the data was done by GraphPad Prism 8.0. Significance levels are: ns denotes not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.000 1.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872409), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313610), the Open Funding of the State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases (SKLOD2021OF02), and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515110110).
Author contributions
D.C., L.P., and C.W. conceived and designed this project. X.W. and M.C. conducted experiments and interpreted results of experiments. K.L. drafted paper, edited, and revised manuscript. F.C., Y.W., G.X., G.W., and S.C. performed patients’ data analysis. Z.C., J.C., and X.X. prepared figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Xiaochen Wang, Kang Li, Yuehan Wan
Contributor Information
Cheng Wang, Email: wangch75@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Liang Peng, Email: pengliang_301@163.com.
Demeng Chen, Email: chendm29@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015;65:87. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:9. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016;91:386. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pastushenko I, Blanpain C. EMT transition states during tumor progression and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:212. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kudo-Saito C, Shirako H, Takeuchi T, Kawakami Y. Cancer metastasis is accelerated through immunosuppression during Snail-induced EMT of cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:195. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:178. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mittal V. Epithelial mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2018;13:395. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhou P, et al. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cells: implication for treatment resistance in pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:52. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0624-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee SY, et al. Induction of metastasis, cancer stem cell phenotype, and oncogenic metabolism in cancer cells by ionizing radiation. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s12943-016-0577-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. EMT: 2016. Cell. 2016;166:21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:131. doi: 10.1038/nrm1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sureban SM, et al. DCLK1 regulates pluripotency and angiogenic factors via microRNA-dependent mechanisms in pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leibovitch M, Topisirovic I. Dysregulation of mRNA translation and energy metabolism in cancer. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2018;67:30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhat M, et al. Targeting the translation machinery in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;14:261. doi: 10.1038/nrd4505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ng TH, et al. Eukaryotic elongation factor-2 kinase expression is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:649. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5873-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu C, Hu DM, Zhu Q. eEF1A2 promotes cell migration, invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer by upregulating MMP-9 expression through Akt activation. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2013;30:933. doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9593-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou D, et al. Phosphorylation of eIF2 directs ATF5 translational control in response to diverse stress conditions. J. BIol. Chem. 2008;283:7064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708530200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vattem KM, Wek RC. Reinitiation involving upstream ORFs regulates ATF4 mRNA translation in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:11269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400541101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu S, et al. METTL13 methylation of eEF1A increases translational output to promote tumorigenesis. Cell. 2019;176:491. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jakobsson ME, et al. The dual methyltransferase METTL13 targets N terminus and Lys55 of eEF1A and modulates codon-specific translation rates. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3411. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05646-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Q, et al. METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification of HDGF mRNA promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic significance. Gut. 2020;69:1193. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol. Cell. 2016;62:335. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jin D, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019;12:135. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0830-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 24.Sun T, et al. LNC942 promoting METTL14-mediated m(6)A methylation in breast cancer cell proliferation and progression. Oncogene. 2020;39:5358. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1338-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liang H, et al. miR-16 promotes the apoptosis of human cancer cells by targeting FEAT. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:448. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1458-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen YC, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a putative marker for cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;385:307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pedersen MT, Jensen KB. Cell biology: unconventional translation in cancer. Nature. 2017;541:471. doi: 10.1038/nature21115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lindqvist LM, Tandoc K, Topisirovic I, Furic L. Cross-talk between protein synthesis, energy metabolism and autophagy in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2018;48:104. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Talavera A, et al. Phosphorylation decelerates conformational dynamics in bacterial translation elongation factors. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:p9714. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hamey JJ, Wilkins MR. Methylation of elongation factor 1A: where, who, and why? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018;43:211. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arguelles S, Munoz MF, Cano M, Machado A, Ayala A. In vitro and in vivo protection by melatonin against the decline of elongation factor-2 caused by lipid peroxidation: preservation of protein synthesis. J. Pineal Res. 2012;53:1. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dever TE, Green R. The elongation, termination, and recycling phases of translation in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012;4:a13706. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a013706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takahashi A, et al. A novel potent tumour promoter aberrantly overexpressed in most human cancers. Sci. Rep. 2011;1:15. doi: 10.1038/srep00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li L, et al. HN1L-mediated transcriptional axis AP-2gamma/METTL13/TCF3-ZEB1 drives tumor growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:2268. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0301-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Miro C, et al. Thyroid hormone induces progression and invasiveness of squamous cell carcinomas by promoting a ZEB-1/E-cadherin switch. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5410. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13140-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang WD, Shang Y, Li Y, Chen SZ. Honokiol inhibits breast cancer cell metastasis by blocking EMT through modulation of Snail/Slug protein translation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2019;40:1219. doi: 10.1038/s41401-019-0240-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang X, et al. Bmi1 severs as a potential tumor-initiating cell marker and therapeutic target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cells Int. 2020;2020:8877577. doi: 10.1155/2020/8877577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lin X, et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of Snail. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2065. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09865-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 40.Chen D, et al. Targeting BMI1(+) cancer stem cells overcomes chemoresistance and inhibits metastases in squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:621. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]