Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Aug 11;11:16265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95844-4

MOF-derived Co2+-doped TiO2 nanoparticles as photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells

R Krishnapriya 1,2, C Nizamudeen 1, B Saini 2, M Sayem Mozumder 3, Rakesh K Sharma 2, A-H I Mourad 1,4,5,
PMCID: PMC8358052  PMID: 34381114

Abstract

Facile synthesis and application of nano-sized semiconductor metal oxides for optoelectronic devices have always affected fabrication challenges since it involves multi-step synthesis processes. In this regard, semiconductor oxides derived directly from metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) routes have gained a great deal of scientific interest owing to their high specific surface area, regular and tunable pore structures. Exploring the application potential of these MOF-derived semiconductor oxides systems for clean energy conversion and storage devices is currently a hot topic of research. In this study, titanium-based MIL-125(Ti) MOFs were used as a precursor to synthesize cobalt-doped TiO2-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) for the first time. The thermal decomposition of the MOF precursor under an air atmosphere at 400 °C resulted in mesoporous anatase-type TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) of uniform morphology, large surface area with narrow pore distribution. The Co2+ doping in TiO2 leads to enhanced light absorption in the visible region. When used as photoanode in DSSCs, a good power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.86% with good photocurrent density (Jsc) of 13.96 mA cm−2 was obtained with the lowest recombination resistance and the longest electron lifetime, which is better than the performance of the pristine TiO2-based photoanode.

Subject terms: Solar cells, Nanoparticles

Introduction

The depletion of natural resources and environmental pollution have intensified climate change and outpaced nature's sustainability. Consequently, the advancement of sustainable clean energy technologies that are highly efficient and cost-effective is inevitable and getting innovative scientific attention14. Alternative energy technologies such as biomass, wind, wave, geothermal, and solar energies are highly desirable to compensate for the current energy demand scenario. Amidst the above-mentioned renewable energy sources, sunlight is clean and accessible at free cost. Solar cells are ingenious devices that can effectively harness and convert sunlight directly to useful electrical energy through the photoelectric effect57. Accordingly, solar photovoltaic (PV) technology appears very viable solution. Compared to other PV technologies, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are prospective candidates owing to their simple solution-processable synthesis and cost-effective fabrication procedures8,9.

A DSSC device mainly consists of a photoanode with a wide bandgap semiconductor (TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, etc.) layer, a photosensitizer (dye), a redox electrolyte-based on I/I3 and a Platinum-based counter electrode (CE)1012. Photoanodes are a crucial part of DSSC, and their functions include providing a high surface area to adsorb adequate dye molecules for effective light-harvesting, facilitating a suitable path for electron transport, and providing macropores for effective electrolyte diffusion. Thus, materials that possess intriguing features such as high surface area and tunable porosity, and other surface properties are prerequisites1318. To improve the light harvesting efficiency (LHE) of photoanode, strategies like the incorporation of plasmonic nanoparticles of Ag and Au as well as the use of graphene and graphdiyne materials were reported recently1922. The cell parameters, precisely, the open-circuit photovoltage (VOC), short-circuit current density (JSC), fill factor (FF), and the power conversion efficiency (PCE/η), are considerably affected by the microstructures of the photoanode materials23,24. Commonly used photoanode of DSSCS is TiO2 owing to its relatively high PCE, high surface area, non-toxicity, and low cost. However, random electron transport in this material results in the recombination of electron–hole pairs leading to poor device performance.

Moreover, the large bandgap of TiO2 (3.3 eV) often poses the proper excitation and injection of photoelectrons, leading to inept electron transportation and electrical conductivity. Bandgap engineering via doping with metals can moderate or reduce the optical band gap by introducing many intermediate energy levels in TiO2 and can cause feasible electron transitions with minimum excitation energy2527. Such a doped semiconductor oxide layer demonstrated less recombination rate for the photogenerated electron and hole pairs with the advantage of many trapped states. This doping methodology is highly promising for semiconductor-based optoelectronic devices2830. Among various metals reported for doping, transition metal (TM) doped TiO2 NCs have been ascertained as appropriate candidates for broad photoresponse in the visible light region and hence demonstrated as effective for solar energy conversion3133.

Additionally, extensive research has been devoted to improve the photoanode properties of DSSCs, in which the introduction of porous photoanodes made of various template-assisted synthesis was successfully employed3438. However, the broad applicability of these photoanodes were limited due to high fabrication cost and unfavorable possibilities for large scale production. Recently, mesoporous TiO2 materials derived from metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are getting much attention owing to their advantages, like high porosities and extraordinary variability in structural engineering3941. MOFs are a special class of porous materials formed of metal ions and organic linkers42,43. It can be applied as efficient templates to fabricate hierarchically porous metal oxide nanostructures for DSSC electrode application. These MOF-derived metal oxides often benefit from precise morphologies, huge porosities, easy methods to dope heteroatoms, and metal nanoparticles. They can exhibit significant electrochemical properties, which are intrinsically inherited from the precursor MOF used39,44. However, the application of MOF-derived TiO2 is not well explored for photovoltaic applications.

ZIF-8 is the first MOF that was applied for DSSC applications, where its thin layer was coated on the conventional TiO2 photoanode45. The ZIF-8 coating could effectively inhibit the recombination loss of the modified device. Later interfacial modification of the photoanode layer was demonstrated using the ZIF-8 layer to enhance both the short-circuit current and the open-circuit voltage46. Dou et al. presented a novel strategy for the application of MIL-125(Ti) for DSSCs. The hierarchically porous TiO2 nanocrystals prepared directly via the calcination of highly porous MIL-125(Ti) showed the high surface area and pore size with enhanced PCE owing to the superior dye adsorption, quick electron transport, and enhanced charge collection efficiency47.Hence to fabricate doped TiO2 nanostructures through MOF route is a highly promising strategy as these materials can avail the advantages of both doping and also the intrinsically unique structural properties inherited from the MOFs precursors48,49.

Here we report an efficient strategy to modify the photoanode of DSSCs using mesoporous cobalt doped TiO2 of unique morphologies derived from MIL-125(Ti) for the first time. The prepared doped TiO2 nanostructured TiO2 exhibited a PCE as high as 6.86% with a reduced bandgap. Extended visible light absorption was observed, which facilitated more absorbed photons as charge carriers with suppressed recombination rate. This simple method to modify the photoanode resulted in enhanced Jsc and PCE with reduced recombination loss, demonstrate the possibility of improving the next-generation DSSC photoanode to achieve promising device performance.

Results and discussion

MIL-125(Ti) MOF was fabricated through a solvothermal process reported in previous literature48. Figure 1a shows the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of MIL-125(Ti), cobalt incorporated MIL-125(Ti), and the calcined MOF derived pristine and doped TiO2. Before the calcination process, the diffraction peaks obtained at 2θ = 6.7°, 9.5°, 9.7°, 11.5°, and 16.6° respectively; which are all in good agreement with those reported earlier for MIL-125 (Ti)50,51. After calcination, the samples showed crystalline peaks with the complete transformation of MOF precursor to pure metal oxide phase52,53. The observed diffraction peaks of calcined samples at 25.53°, 38.54°, 48.10°, 55.04°, 68.8° and 75.2° were indexed to (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (215) cubic crystal planes of anatase TiO2 according to the JCPDS card number 21-1272. The obtained XRD patterns of all cobalt doped samples almost coincide with that of pure anatase TiO2 without any peaks related to rutile or to metallic cobalt or cobalt oxide, endorsing that the anatase phase is not effected upon Co doping. A slight shift of the most intense (101) peak towards the lower 2θ values was identified for all doped samples, which is ascribed to be the expansion of the TiO2 unit cell due to the incorporation of Co2+. The ionic radius of Co2+ (Co2+  = 0.79 Å) is larger than that of Ti (Ti4+  = 0.745 Å) leading to an expansion TiO2 crystal with an increase of the lattice parameters. Also, a change in FWHM of (101) peak was observed after doping, which indicating the modification in the local structure around Ti4+ after Co doping. This confirms the successful incorporation of Co in TiO2 lattice. Apart from these, a small peak can be observed around 30.6° for the doped samples with the gradual increase in intensity (highlighted part in Fig. 1a). It is also inferred that the spectra obtained are devoid of any impurity during the solvothermal synthesis procedure. The obtained low-intensity peaks are attributed to the small size of the TiO2 nanoparticles formed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) PXRD patterns of pristine and doped MIL-125 (Ti) and the corresponding TiO2 semiconductor oxides after thermal annealing. (b) Diffuse reflectance spectra of MOF derived TiO2 samples and (c) its corresponding bandgap energy Kubelka–Munk plot (d) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and (e) the corresponding BJH pore size distribution.

The incorporation of cobalt into the TiO2 crystal lattice can influence the bandgap. This variation in bandgap after the cobalt incorporation can be clearly identified using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, which is given in Fig. 1b. The full coverage of the UV–vis spectral range can be evident. In comparison to the pristine sample, Co2+ ion-doped TiO2 samples exhibited additional peaks in the visible region (450–800) in the sub-bandgap region. Doping has a direct influence on the optical properties of TiO2, which extended light absorption towards the visible region due to the formation of sub-bandgap states between the conduction and valence bands with oxygen vacancy sites54. The UV–vis diffuse reflection spectrum of pristine TiO2 is flat in the visible (400–800 nm) region. However, the reflection decreases drastically upon doping with cobalt55. The bandgap energy is determined from diffuse reflectance spectra following the theory of P. Kubelka and F. Munk presented in 1931 (Fig. 1c)56. Accordingly, a gradual decrease of the optical bandgap from ~ 3.3 to ~ 2.9 eV was obtained. The UV–Visible light response of the prepared samples was also studied by optical absorption spectroscopy of the samples in methanolic solution as in supplementary Figure S1. All of the doped samples showed much enhancement absorption compared to the pristine sample, which indicates the enhanced optical response of the samples after cobalt doping.

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured to investigate the surface area (Fig. 1d), and pore size distribution (Fig. 1e) of all samples. The samples showed type IV isotherm curves. The BET surface area and the pore volume of undoped TiO2 were obtained as 118 m2 g−1 and 0.32 cm3 g−1, respectively. A narrow pore size distribution around 5–6 nm was observed for TiO2 from the BJH analysis. All the doped samples showed slightly less surface area compared to undoped samples; 10-Co–TiO2 (92 m2 g−1and 0.30 cm3 g−1) 30-Co–TiO2 (90 m2 g−1and 0.33 cm3 g−1) and 50-Co–TiO2 (84 m2 g−1 and 0.29 cm3 g−1). Thus, the samples exhibit a relatively uniform mesoporous structure.

The morphological features of the sample before and after cobalt doping were characterized by SEM and TEM analysis. Figure 2a–d shows the SEM images of the doped and undoped samples. The undoped sample (Fig. 2a) depicted disc-like morphologies consisting of numerous nanoparticles with a diameter of 200–300 nm. Upon doping, the material showed drastic changes for both size and morphologies with very rough surfaces consisting of orderly arranged numerous nanoparticles of spherical shape with average sizes below 30 nm (Fig. 2b,c). At a higher doping concentration of cobalt, a more porous structured rough surface of the sample was perceived (Fig. 2d). The elemental identification of the sample was confirmed by EDS spectroscopy, and the spectra are given in supplementary Figure S2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Morphological evolutions of MOF-derived TiO2 samples from nanodiscs to spherical nanoparticles on doping.

Further insights into the morphological and crystalline properties of samples were obtained from HR TEM analysis given in Fig. 3a–f. The pristine TiO2 particle was found to be of an average size of 0.5 µm (Fig. 3a,b). The SAED pattern (Fig. 3c) shows clear, distinct rings confirming the polycrystalline nature. The obtained rings in SAED pattern were indexed (101), (200), and (201) planes of tetragonal anatase TiO2 by calculating d-spacing. The result obtained is corroborated with the planes obtained in the XRD analysis of phase pure anatase TiO2. For undoped TiO2, the thickness of the particle observed was too high; as a result of this, the lattice fringes were not identified in HRTEM. However, the doped sample displayed (Fig. 3d) particle size of ~ 25 nm with clear lattice fringes as shown in Fig. 3e. HRTEM images displayed clear lattice fringes with d-spacing of 3.5 Å (inset figure of Fig. 3e) that matches (101) plane of tetragonal anatase phase of TiO2 ascertaining the preferable crystal growth plane is (101), that is corroborated with the maximum intense peak obtained in XRD57. Based on the FESEM and HR-TEM studies, the crystal growth mechanism can be explained. The formation of the precursor MOF (MIL125 (Ti)) occurred with eight TiO6 octahedra (oh) units attached by terephthalate linkers which results in the formation of a three-dimensional (3D) microporous network. When the solvothermal reaction proceeds, the solvent ions readily enter into the microporous channel and quickly react with MIL-125 (Ti) to form TiO2 nuclei and trigger the crystal growth process. During the crystal growth, the solvent ions prefer to adsorb on the (001) crystal faces of anatase TiO2. Since the [001] growth direction is inhibited, other growth directions such as [100] are enhanced, resulting in nano-disk morphologies of TiO2. A density difference occurs between MIL-125 (Ti) and TiO2 that can readily generate cracks in the MIL-125 (Ti) crystal. Thus the MOF precursor breaks into pieces. The presence of Co2+ ions affected the crystal growth pattern and resulted in a particle-like TiO2 NCs58. Upon increasing the concentration of dopants the agglomeration of NCs occurs which gives more open morphological structures made of small particle like NCs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HR-TEM images of the MOF-derived pristine TiO2 and cobalt doped samples.

Raman spectroscopic analysis was carried out to get more insight into the crystallinity, dopant-induced structural variations and also to understand the molecular vibration properties of all TiO2 samples, and the spectra are shown in Fig. 4. From group theory, anatase TiO2 has tetragonal structure and has six Raman active modes, A1g + 2B1g + 3Eg, respectively59. Eg peak arises by O–Ti–O symmetric stretching vibration in TiO2, whereas B1g by O–Ti–O symmetric bending vibration and A1g appears due to O–Ti–O anti-symmetric bending vibration. The peaks centered at 144, 398, 518, and 641 cm−1 are characteristic to Eg(1), B1g, A1g, and Eg modes, respectively. No Raman modes corresponding to the rutile phase were observed. The obtained spectra of the as-synthesized samples also showed the archetypal tetragonal form of phase pure anatase TiO2, which corroborates the obtained outcome from XRD. The intense Eg(1) mode indicates the long-range order in the crystal. Upon doping with cobalt, the Eg (1) peaks of all doped samples show a blue shift and a gradual decrease in intensity. This peak broadening, blue shifting as well as weakening of peak intensity is owing to the non-stoichiometry created owing to oxygen vacancy and phonon confinement effect due to the nanoscale size effect of the crystallites. The breakdown of long-range translational crystal symmetry occurs by the incorporation of Co2+. As a result, oxygen vacancies were introduced, which results in the weakening of the Raman signals. Thus, the Raman results obtained were found to be dependable with the XRD data.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Room-temperature Raman spectra of pristine and doped TiO2.

The thermal stability of the samples was studied using TGA analysis, and the resultant data are shown in supplementary Figure S3. Maximum weight loss was obtained for the MIL-TiO2 sample before calcination, which is possibly due to the existence of residual carbon present in the sample60,61. All the calcined samples (i.e., pristine and doped TiO2) showed significantly less weight loss as well as high thermal stability. Also, it is observed that there is almost no weight loss above 250 °C, signifying that all the organic moieties were removed after the annealing process. It is noteworthy to mention that a slight weight loss ~ 2 wt.% observed below 250 ◦C is due to water adsorption on the sample surface.

The chemical composition, probability of secondary phases, oxygen vacancy, and oxidation state of surface elements were revealed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the synthesized materials. Figure 5a–f shows the XPS spectrum of TiO2, and 30-Co–TiO2, respectively. Figure 5a is the survey spectrum of both the samples, which showed the characteristic peaks of Co, Ti, and O confirms the chemical composition in materials. The status of surface elements was further examined by the high-resolution XPS spectra; Fig. 5b presents the XPS spectrum of Ti 2p with Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 located at 458.25 and 463.97 eV, respectively, which matches the characteristic peaks of Ti4+–O bonds62.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) A comparative XPS survey spectra of MOF derived TiO2 and cobalt doped TiO2 (bf) Core spectra of Ti, O and Co.

From Fig. 5d of cobalt core-level spectra, peaks at binding energies of 780.64 eV of Co 2p3/2 are observed, which corresponds to the oxidation state of + 2 of cobalt in TiO2. Another peak observed around 796.59 eV corresponds to Co 2p1/2. The spin–orbit splitting value of 15.95 eV, as well as the peak broadening, clearly supports the successful inclusion of Co2+ over Ti atoms in the host lattice, that generates oxygen vacancy63. The presence of Ti3+ and Co2+ indicates that both samples have a definite amount of oxygen vacancies.

DSSCs fabricated with undoped as well as Co2+ doped samples were analyzed under simulated sunlight AM 1.5 with power 100 mW cm−2. Figure 6 elucidates the J–V curves of the fabricated DSSCs. Table 1 summarizes the obtained parameters from the J–V curves, including short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE). For the commercially available P25 titania sample, the obtained short circuit current and open-circuit voltage were Jsc = 10.35 mA/cm2, FF = 70.12% andVoc = 0.79 V with a PCE of 5.76%.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A comparative photocurrent density versus voltage curve (J–V) for MOF derived pristine TiO2 and Co2+ ion-doped TiO2 photoanode-based DSSCs.

Table 1.

A comparative DSSC photovoltaic performance data determined by photocurrent density–voltage (J–V) and EIS characteristic analysis of different photoanodes.

Cell Jsc Voc Jmax Vmax FF PCE RS RCT (Pt) RCT (TiO2)
(mA/cm2) (V) (mA/cm2) (V) (%) (%) Ω/cm2 Ω/cm2 Ω/cm2
P25 10.35 ± 0.01 0.79 ± 0.01 8.91 ± 0.01 0.65 ± 0.01 70.13 ± 0.01 5.76 ± 0.01 20.36 0.86 14.72
TiO2 10.83 ± 0.02 0.80 ± 0.01 9.53 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.01 70.06 ± 0.01 6.06 ± 0.02 20.79 0.45 12.97
10-Co-TiO2 13.33 ± 0.01 0.79 ± 0.02 10.95 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.02 61.62 ± 0.02 6.46 ± 0.01 20.39 0.86 12.53
30-Co-TiO2 13.96 ± 0.01 0.78 ± 0.01 11.50 ± 0.02 0.60 ± 0.01 62.76 ± 0.01 6.86 ± 0.01 20.24 0.94 11.89
50-Co-TiO2 12.74 ± 0.03 0.78 ± 0.01 10.55 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.03 62.19 ± 0.01 6.19 ± 0.04 20.51 0.83 13.13

MOF route-derived TiO2 showed enhanced PCE of 6.06% with improved Jsc and Voc of 10.83 mA/cm2 and 0.799 V, respectively, however, the FF is reduced slightly to 70.05%Upon doping with 10 mg of cobalt, an increment in Jsc (of 13.33 mA/cm2) was observed while the Voc (0.786) was decreased slightly. A considerable decrease in FF (61.62%) is observed. However, a net PCE of 6.46% was obtained, which showed a 12.3% improvement from the PCE data of fabricated DSSC with P25 as photoanode. When doping concentration was increased to 30 mg; PCE of 6.86% was achieved with increased Jsc = 13.96 mA/cm2, FF = 62.76% and slightly less Voc = 0.78 V. Upon further increase of cobalt to 50 mg, Jsc, FF and Voc were decreased to 12.74 mA/cm2, 62.19% and 0.781 V with decreased PCE of 6.19%, but the PV performance was still greater in comparison to the pristine TiO2 sample. From the obtained results, it is understood that the FF of DSSCs fabricated with doped samples were decreased compared to the reference and pristine TiO2 based DSSCs. This can be explained as follows. The FF of a DSSC device mainly depends on the morphology and thickness of the photoanode film. Increased thickness of photoanode results in a high fill factor. However, the fill factor drops if the recombination of the charge carriers is more. Here, all the fabricated photoanodes in our study, including the reference photoanode, has the average thickness of 10–13 µm. Therefore, the difference in fill factor of DSSCs between the doped and reference photoanodes is due to the morphological difference, which can be clearly understood from the SEM and TEM characterization. Also, the BET studies showed the highly porous nature of the doped samples, which causes the excess of electrolyte diffusion into the photoanode film resulting in a high recombination rate of photogenerated electrons and subsequent reduction in FF64, 65. The fabricated DSSC cells were further analyzed to understand the electron lifetime and recombination characteristics with the help of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopic technique at a frequency range from 10−1 to 105 Hz with an alternative current amplitude of 10 mV. The obtained Nyquist and Bode phase plots of pure and doped samples under AM 1.5 illumination were shown in Fig. 7a,b, respectively. In the Nyquist plot (Fig. 7a), two semicircles were obtained for all the samples. In which the small semicircle in the high-frequency region corresponds to the redox as well as electron transfer reaction at the Pt counter electrode–electrolyte interface24. The other large semicircle at the low-frequency region is related to the accumulation/transport of the photoinjected electrons within the photoanode film and the electron transfer across the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. This is considered as the characteristic peaks, which give a clear idea of the recombination behavior of electrons through the semiconductor oxide layer. The EIS curve is fitted using the equivalent circuit and the corresponding extracted parameters were given in Table 1. The sheet resistance (Rs) values obtained for all the devices were found to be similar and is ~ 20 Ω/cm2. The charge transfer resistance at the Pt CE interface obtained was below 1 Ω/cm2 for all the devices. The DSSCs fabricated using 30-Co–TiO2 based samples exhibited the lowest recombination resistance (11.89 Ω/cm2) compared to the reference (14.72 Ω/cm2) and undoped TiO2 (12.97 Ω/cm2) based DSSCs. The 10-Co–TiO2 and 50-Co–TiO2 based DSSC devices showed slightly higher resistance, 12.53 and 13.13 Ω/cm2, respectively. The result indicates the much-accelerated electron transfer in the device through reduction of charge transfer resistance resulting in an increment in Jsc. Figure 7b displays the Bode phase plots obtained from the impedance results. From Bode plots, the lifetime of the photo-injected electrons (τe) in semiconductor oxide layer can be calculated from the peak frequency (ƒmax) in the large semicircle region relate to the equation: τe = 1/2πƒmax; where ƒmax is the maximum characteristic peak frequency. The calculated τe values show an increased trend in a sequence of 30-Co–TiO2 (16.1 ms) > 10-Co–TiO2 (15.3 ms) > pure TiO2 (6.1 ms) > 50-Co–TiO2 (5.2 ms). In support of the Nyquist results, the 30-Co–TiO2 based cells demonstrated the lowest recombination resistance and the longest electron lifetime, which is accountable for the uninterrupted electron transport through the oxide layer to a longer distance, leading to the enhanced PCE66,67. However, at higher doping concentrations, the fabricated DSSCs revealed high recombination resistance at the semiconductor oxide/electrolyte interface with lesser τe (5.2 ms) which obstruct the cell performance by critically affecting the charge transport. On the other hand, at a lower doping concentration (10 mg of Co), the obtained τe was less (15.3 ms) as compared to 16.1 ms (for 10-Co–TiO2). Thus the impedance spectra are directly relating to the I–V results. Also, it is evident that doping can influence the morphology and also surface chemistry of the semiconductor film. In this work, maximum PCE was achieved for the doped sample with 30 mg Co2+, which was substantially ascribed to the improved surface roughness of the TiO2 after the successful integration of cobalt ions. Moreover, the additional cobalt ions in photoanode films can prevent effective photoinduced electron–hole pairs separation by acting as recombination centers, as evident from the EIS results. The particle-like morphologies induce better interconnection that bids appropriate deployment of incident light and fast electron transport. As the doping concentration increased to 50 mg, the resulted sample shows drastic changes in morphology with lots of voids and pores, resulting in the formation of secondary impurity phases as well the incorporation of Co ions at the interstitial position. Due to this, the device shows high recombination resistance with smaller τe. Based on the above observations, the deduced electron transport over the cobalt doped TiO2 photoanode is given in Fig. 8. Here the Co2+ doping in TiO2 significantly shifted the conduction band positively, which results in an enhanced driving force of electron injection and thus increases the electron injection efficiency from the LUMO of dye to the conduction band of TiO2. Thus, improved light absorption and repressed charge recombination is obtained, as obvious from the UV–vis and impedance spectroscopic measurements68. Thus, a significant improvement in Jsc was achieved. Doping could also protect the photoanode against photooxidation. Here the photon energy is effectively transferred to the Co2+ ions capable of quickly localizing the excitation and suppression of undesired reactions on the photoanode surface.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Nyquist and (b) Bode impedance plot for TiO2 and different Co2+ ion doped TiO2 photoanode-based DSSCs. The equivalent circuit used to fit the impedance curve is inserted in (a).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Schematics of possible electron transfer mechanism in MOF derived Co2+ ion doped TiO2photoanode based DSSCs.

Conclusion

In summary, we have successfully synthesized Co2+ ion-doped TiO2 nanocrystals via the MOF route. The structure and photovoltaic performance of the doped crystals were studied systematically using various characterization techniques. It was observed that the MOF-derived TiO2 samples have more surface roughness and more conductivity. The highest PCE of 6.86% in DSSC was achieved by 30 mg Co2+ ion-doped TiO2 in comparison to commercially available P25 Degussa (5.76%). The enhanced PCE was accredited to numerous factors, such as dopant-induced morphological and optical bandgap changes that resulted in improved light-harvesting efficiency with less recombination of photoinjected electrons. Better surface stability is attained after cobalt incorporation, which results in less dye aggregation on the surface with subsequent suppression in the recombination loss. The formation of several photoinduced charge carriers by charge transfer transition of Co2+ ions mainly contributed to the improved photocurrent, which paved the way for better PV performance. To further improve the PCE, modification of photoanode by the deposition of scattering layer and the study on its thickness is in progress.

Materials and methods

N, N-dimethyl formamide (99.8%), DMF, cobalt acetate tetrahydrate (99.99%), terephthalic acid (98%), titanium (IV) butoxide (97%), and anhydrous ethanol (98%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. All the reagents were used intrinsically without additional purification, and deionized water was used for all the synthesis processes. All the solvothermal reaction was carried out in a 100mL autoclave provided by Amar Equipments Pvt. Ltd.

Characterization

The synthesized catalyst samples were analyzed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) technique using a Panalytical-Empyrean X-ray diffractometer, Netherlands with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) at 45 kV and 40 mA to scan the diffraction angles from 10° to 80°. The phase identification was carried out using standard patterns reported in the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out in a PerkinElmer, Simultaneous Thermal Analyzer (STA) from room temperature to 900 °C at 10 C/min under N2 atmosphere. FESEM and HR-TEM analysis were done using Tecnai G2 F20 instrument from FEI, Netherlands operating at 200KV. For TEM study, the samples were dispersed homogenously in isopropanol by ultrasonication and drop-casted onto a copper grid, and dried overnight before loading. Surface area and porosity measurements were analyzed using standard adsorption equipment AUTOSORB-1Q-MP-XR, Quantachrome Instruments, USA using N2 gas with 99.995% purity. The sample was activated under a vacuum at 150 °C for 3 h followed by nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherm measurement at 77K. The surface composition and chemical states were measured with an Omicron Nanotechnology (Oxford Instruments) X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS) equipped with monochromatic Al Kα radiation, and the obtained spectra were fitted by means of a Gaussian function. The peak correction was done with reference to the standard carbon 1s peak obtained at 285.07 eV. I–V analysis for the DSSC was recorded using the CHI660e from CH Instruments under one sun irradiation by PET Photo Emission Tech with SS50AAA solar simulator. Electrochemical Impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured by a Biologic potentiostat–galvanostat (SP-150) under an open circuit (Voc) under illumination. The frequency ranges from 0.1 Hz to 105 Hz with 10 mV alternative (AC) signal.

Synthesis:

MIL-125 synthesis

Ti-based MOFs (i.e., MIL-125) were synthesized by the solvothermal method. To a mixture solution of terephthalic acid (3 g), anhydrous methanol (6 mL), and anhydrous DMF (54 mL), butyl titanate (4.5 mM) was added slowly with continuous stirring. The whole mixture is loaded into a 100 mL teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and allowed to heat to 150°C for 24 hr. After, a white suspension of MIL-125 was obtained, separated by centrifugation, and washed with methanol (3 x 50 mL). The sample is subsequently dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 12 h.

TiO2 and cobalt doped TiO2 synthesis

The as-synthesized MIL-125 sample was annealed at 400 °C at a rate of 2°C min−1 for 5 h to result in the pure titania powder stored in the sample vial for further uses. To prepare the doped TiO2 samples, CoCl2·6H2O (10, 30, and 50 mg) was added to the latter reaction mixture, and the same synthesis procedure was followed. After calcination, the doped samples were obtained with light to dark green depending on the amount of cobalt precursor.

Photoanode preparation

To Prepare the DSSC photoanode, the synthesized samples (0.5g) were dispersed into 4mL ethanol by ultrasonication for 15 minutes. Then add 1.5g terpineol and 0.10g ethyl cellulose and sonicate the solution to form a homogenous viscous paste. The prepared paste was deposited on cleaned fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrate (transparent electrode with a typical square sheet resistance of 10 Ω/sq and overall transmittance about 85% in the visible range) by doctor blade method to get a thickness of ~13–15 μm using 3M scotch tape into an area of 0.25 cm2 (with proper masking). After drying in the air, the coated substrates were heated in a furnace (450°C for 2h). After reaching room temperature, the substrates were immersed in a 0.5 mM solution of N719 dye (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes.

Counter electrode preparation

To prepare the Pt-counter electrodes, one or two drops of 5 mM H2PtCl6 solution in isopropanol were drop cast onto the FTO and subsequently sintered at 400°C for 20 min. The transparent electrode obtained was used as such as the counter electrode without further heat treatment or modification.

Electrolyte preparation and assembling of DSSC

The photoanode and counter electrode were sandwiched together with surlyn film of 30 μm thickness as a spacer. Further, one or two drops of redox couple electrolyte consisting of 0.06 M 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium iodide, 0.03 M of iodine solution (I2), 0.10 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 0.5 M 4-tert-butylpyridine dissolved in a mixture of acetonitrile and valeronitrile (volume ratio, 85:15), were added and introduced into the DSSC with a syringe.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (489.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank UAE University strategic research program (#31R238) in collaboration with the University of California, Berkeley, UAE University Ph.D. research grant (#31N414) and SERB-CRG (CRG/2020/002163) for funding the research work. We also thank CASE facility at IIT Jodhpur, CIT Coimbatore, Department of Nanoscience and Technology, University of Calicut, for material characterization.

Author contributions

R.K. and C.N. contributed equally. R.K., C.N., M.S.M. and A-H.I.M. involved in conceptualization of research idea. R.K. and C.N. analysed the results and prepared the manuscript. R.K. and B.S. performed the experiments and carried out analytical characterizations. R.K.S., M.S.M. and A-H.I.M. supervised the work. All the authors were involved in scientific discussion of the research work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-95844-4.

References

  • 1.Linares N, Silvestre-Albero AM, Serrano E, Silvestre-Albero J, García-Martínez J. Mesoporous materials for clean energy technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:7681–7717. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60435G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khan K, et al. Recent advances in two-dimensional materials and their nanocomposites in sustainable energy conversion applications. Nanoscale. 2019;11:21622–21678. doi: 10.1039/C9NR05919A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kamat PV. Meeting the clean energy demand: nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111:2834–2860. doi: 10.1021/jp066952u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez, M. A. in International Tables for Crystallography 752–758.
  • 5.Nayak PK, Mahesh S, Snaith HJ, Cahen D. Photovoltaic solar cell technologies: Analysing the state of the art. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019;4:269–285. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0097-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hu Z, et al. A critical review on semitransparent organic solar cells. Nano Energy. 2020;78:105376. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105376. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jošt M, Kegelmann L, Korte L, Albrecht S. Monolithic perovskite tandem solar cells: A review of the present status and advanced characterization methods toward 30% efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020;10:1904102. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201904102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gong J, Sumathy K, Qiao Q, Zhou Z. Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Advanced techniques and research trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;68:234–246. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jung HS, Lee J-K. Dye sensitized solar cells for economically viable photovoltaic systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4:1682–1693. doi: 10.1021/jz400112n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Listorti A, O’Regan B, Durrant JR. Electron transfer dynamics in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Mater. 2011;23:3381–3399. doi: 10.1021/cm200651e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gong J, Liang J, Sumathy K. Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Fundamental concepts and novel materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012;16:5848–5860. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramya M, Nideep TK, Nampoori VPN, Kailasnath M. Solvent assisted evolution and growth mechanism of zero to three dimensional ZnO nanostructures for dye sensitized solar cell applications. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:6159. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85701-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yeoh M-E, Chan K-Y. Recent advances in photo-anode for dye-sensitized solar cells: A review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017;41:2446–2467. doi: 10.1002/er.3764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan K, Yu J, Ho W. Improving photoanodes to obtain highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: A brief review. Mater. Horiz. 2017;4:319–344. doi: 10.1039/C6MH00511J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mariotti N, et al. Recent advances in eco-friendly and cost-effective materials towards sustainable dye-sensitized solar cells. Green Chem. 2020;22:7168–7218. doi: 10.1039/D0GC01148G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mozumder MS, Mourad A-HI, Pervez H, Surkatti R. Recent developments in multifunctional coatings for solar panel applications: A review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2019;189:75–102. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.09.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mozumder MS, Mourad A-HI, Mairpady A, Pervez H, Haque ME. Effect of TiO2 nanofiller concentration on the mechanical, thermal and biological properties of HDPE/TiO2 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018;27:2166–2181. doi: 10.1007/s11665-018-3305-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mourad A-HI, Mozumder MS, Mairpady A, Pervez H, Kannuri UM. On the injection molding processing parameters of HDPE-TiO2 nanocomposites. Materials. 2017;10:85. doi: 10.3390/ma10010085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang J, Tian J, Fan J, Yu J, Ho W. Graphdiyne: A brilliant hole accumulator for stable and efficient planar perovskite solar cells. Small. 2020;16:1907290. doi: 10.1002/smll.201907290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petridis K, Kakavelakis G, Stylianakis MM, Kymakis E. Graphene-based inverted planar perovskite solar cells: Advancements, fundamental challenges, and prospects. Chem. Asian J. 2018;13:240–249. doi: 10.1002/asia.201701626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Choudhury BD, et al. A photoanode with hierarchical nanoforest TiO2 structure and silver plasmonic nanoparticles for flexible dye sensitized solar cell. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:7552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87123-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaur N, Bhullar V, Singh DP, Mahajan A. Bimetallic implanted plasmonic photoanodes for TiO2 sensitized third generation solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:7657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64653-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen H-Y, Kuang D-B, Su C-Y. Hierarchically micro/nanostructured photoanode materials for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:15475–15489. doi: 10.1039/C2JM32402D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Krishnapriya R, Praneetha S, Vadivel Murugan A. Energy-efficient, microwave-assisted hydro/solvothermal synthesis of hierarchical flowers and rice grain-like ZnO nanocrystals as photoanodes for high performance dye-sensitized solar cells. CrystEngComm. 2015;17:8353–8367. doi: 10.1039/C5CE01438G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dubey RS, Jadkar SR, Bhorde AB. Synthesis and characterization of various doped TiO2 nanocrystals for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Omega. 2021;6:3470–3482. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Day J, Senthilarasu S, Mallick TK. Improving spectral modification for applications in solar cells: a review. Renew. Energy. 2019;132:186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Unal FA, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and application of transition metals (Ni, Zr, and Fe) doped TiO2 photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mol. Liq. 2020;299:112177. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Buonsanti R, Milliron DJ. Chemistry of doped colloidal nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 2013;25:1305–1317. doi: 10.1021/cm304104m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y, Hao J. Metal-ion doped luminescent thin films for optoelectronic applications. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2013;1:5607–5618. doi: 10.1039/C3TC31024H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jiang L, et al. Niobium-doped (001)-dominated anatase TiO2 nanosheets as photoelectrode for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:9576–9583. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b14147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Janisch R, Gopal P, Spaldin NA. Transition metal-doped TiO2 and ZnO—present status of the field. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2005;17:R657–R689. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/17/27/r01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu S, Su X. The synthesis and application of doped semiconductor nanocrystals. Anal. Methods. 2013;5:4541–4548. doi: 10.1039/C3AY40411K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ünlü B, Özacar M. Effect of Cu and Mn amounts doped to TiO2 on the performance of DSSCs. Sol. Energy. 2020;196:448–456. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Anta JA, Guillén E, Tena-Zaera R. ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:11413–11425. doi: 10.1021/jp3010025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shakeel Ahmad M, Pandey AK, Abd Rahim N. Advancements in the development of TiO2 photoanodes and its fabrication methods for dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC) applications. A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;77:89–108. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu Y-H, et al. Green fluorine-free synthesis of hollow rectangular prism-like TiO2 mesocrystals with exposed 001 facets for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125:1684–1692. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hejazi SMH, Aghazadeh Mohandesi J, Javanbakht M. The effect of functionally graded porous nano structure TiO2 photoanode on efficiency of dye sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy. 2017;144:699–706. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al-Attafi K, Nattestad A, Yamauchi Y, Dou SX, Kim JH. Aggregated mesoporous nanoparticles for high surface area light scattering layer TiO2 photoanodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09911-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhao Y, et al. Metal organic frameworks for energy storage and conversion. Energy Storage Mater. 2016;2:35–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chueh C-C, et al. Harnessing MOF materials in photovoltaic devices: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7:17079–17095. doi: 10.1039/C9TA03595H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang L, Zhu Y, Du C, Ma X, Cao C. Advances and challenges in metal–organic framework derived porous materials for batteries and electrocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:24895–24919. doi: 10.1039/D0TA08311A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. The chemistry and applications of metal–organic frameworks. Science. 2013;341:1230444. doi: 10.1126/science.1230444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li H, Eddaoudi M, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal–organic framework. Nature. 1999;402:276–279. doi: 10.1038/46248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stock N, Biswas S. Synthesis of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): Routes to various MOF topologies, morphologies, and composites. Chem. Rev. 2012;112:933–969. doi: 10.1021/cr200304e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li Y, Pang A, Wang C, Wei M. Metal–organic frameworks: promising materials for improving the open circuit voltage of dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:17259–17264. doi: 10.1039/C1JM12754C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Y, Chen C, Sun X, Dou J, Wei M. Metal–organic frameworks at interfaces in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemsuschem. 2014;7:2469–2472. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201402143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dou J, Li Y, Xie F, Ding X, Wei M. Metal–organic framework derived hierarchical porous anatase TiO2 as a photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cell. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016;16:121–125. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hong Z, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous Co2+-doped TiO2 nanodisks derived from metal organic frameworks with improved sodium storage performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:32071–32079. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b06290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zheng H, et al. Preparation and Enhanced Electrorheological Properties of Ce-Doped Porous Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021;60:1642–1655. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04674. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu Z, et al. Effective elimination of As(III) via simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption by a bifunctional cake-like TiO2 derived from MIL-125(Ti) Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;8:1936–1944. doi: 10.1039/C8CY00125A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dan-Hardi M, et al. A new photoactive crystalline highly porous titanium(IV) dicarboxylate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:10857–10859. doi: 10.1021/ja903726m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chi WS, Roh DK, Lee CS, Kim JH. A shape- and morphology-controlled metal organic framework template for high-efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:21599–21608. doi: 10.1039/C5TA06731F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.An Y, et al. Photocatalytic overall water splitting over MIL-125(Ti) upon CoPi and Pt Co-catalyst deposition. Chemistry Open. 2017;6:701–705. doi: 10.1002/open.201700100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Manthina V, Agrios AG. Band edge engineering of composite photoanodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta. 2015;169:416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gole JL, et al. Study of concentration-dependent cobalt ion doping of TiO2 and TiO2−xNx at the nanoscale. Nanoscale. 2010;2:1134–1140. doi: 10.1039/C0NR00125B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Makuła P, Pacia M, Macyk W. How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:6814–6817. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Krishnapriya R, Praneetha S, Vadivel Murugan A. Microwave-solvothermal synthesis of various TiO2 nano-morphologies with enhanced efficiency by incorporating Ni nanoparticles in an electrolyte for dye-sensitized solar cells. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017;4:1665–1678. doi: 10.1039/C7QI00329C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xiu Z, et al. Hierarchical porous anatase TiO2 derived from a titanium metal–organic framework as a superior anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:12274–12277. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03381K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ohsaka T. Temperature Dependence of the Raman Spectrum in Anatase TiO2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1980;48:1661–1668. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.48.1661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mourad A-HI. Thermo-mechanical characteristics of thermally aged polyethylene/polypropylene blends. Mater. Des. 2010;31:918–929. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mourad AHI, Akkad RO, Soliman AA, Madkour TM. Characterisation of thermally treated and untreated polyethylene–polypropylene blends using DSC, TGA and IR techniques. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2009;38:265–278. doi: 10.1179/146580109X12473409436625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu Z, et al. Hierarchical porous anatase TiO2 microspheres with high-rate and long-term cycling stability for sodium storage in ether-based electrolyte. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020;3:3619–3627. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chanda A, Rout K, Vasundhara M, Joshi SR, Singh J. Structural and magnetic study of undoped and cobalt doped TiO2 nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2018;8:10939–10947. doi: 10.1039/C8RA00626A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shalan AE, Rashad MM. Incorporation of Mn2+ and Co2+ to TiO2 nanoparticles and the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013;283:975–981. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yacoubi B, Samet L, Bennaceur J, Lamouchi A, Chtourou R. Properties of transition metal doped-titania electrodes: Impact on efficiency of amorphous and nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015;30:361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.10.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Q, Moser J-E, Grätzel M. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis of dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:14945–14953. doi: 10.1021/jp052768h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sacco A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Fundamentals and application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;79:814–829. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Krishnapriya, R., Praneetha, S., Kannan, S. & Vadivel Murugan, A. Unveiling the Co2+ Ion Doping-Induced Hierarchical Shape Evolution of ZnO: In Correlation with Magnetic and Photovoltaic Performance. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering5, 9981–9992, doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01918 (2017).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (489.7KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES