Skip to main content
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences logoLink to Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
. 2021 Jul 29;8:705133. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.705133

Sialidase and Sialyltransferase Inhibitors: Targeting Pathogenicity and Disease

William H D Bowles 1, Tracey M Gloster 1,*
PMCID: PMC8358268  PMID: 34395532

Abstract

Sialidases (SAs) and sialyltransferases (STs), the enzymes responsible for removing and adding sialic acid to other glycans, play essential roles in viruses, bacteria, parasites, and humans. Sialic acid is often the terminal sugar on glycans protruding from the cell surface in humans and is an important component for recognition and cell function. Pathogens have evolved to exploit this and use sialic acid to either “cloak” themselves, ensuring they remain undetected, or as a mechanism to enable release of virus progeny. The development of inhibitors against SAs and STs therefore provides the opportunity to target a range of diseases. Inhibitors targeting viral, bacterial, or parasitic enzymes can directly target their pathogenicity in humans. Excellent examples of this can be found with the anti-influenza drugs Zanamivir (Relenza™, GlaxoSmithKline) and Oseltamivir (Tamiflu™, Roche and Gilead), which have been used in the clinic for over two decades. However, the development of resistance against these drugs means there is an ongoing need for novel potent and specific inhibitors. Humans possess 20 STs and four SAs that play essential roles in cellular function, but have also been implicated in cancer progression, as glycans on many cancer cells are found to be hyper-sialylated. Whilst much remains unknown about how STs function in relation to disease, it is clear that specific inhibitors of them can serve both as tools to gain a better understanding of their activity and form the basis for development of anti-cancer drugs. Here we review the recent developments in the design of SA and ST inhibitors against pathogens and humans.

Keywords: sialidase, sialyltransferase, inhibition, neuraminidase, sialic acid, Neu5Ac, cancer, influenza

Introduction

Sialic acid is a ubiquitous carbohydrate utilized by species across the domains of life and viruses. Sialidases (SAs) and sialyltransferases (STs) (Figure 1A) are the carbohydrate processing enzymes responsible for catalysing the addition and removal of sialic acid (Neu5Ac, 1) to or from glycans attached to proteins or lipids on the cell surface. Inhibition of these enzymes is important to gain a better understanding of the biological roles played by glycans, but is also fundamental in the treatment of diseases. A number of these inhibitors were discovered several decades ago and are in clinical use, whereas others are only now being realised.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Reactions catalysed by SAs, trans-SAs, and STs, with glycosidic bonds broken or formed shown in red between each monosaccharide. SAs and STs act to hydrolyse or create different linkages (α-2,3/α-2,6/α-2,8/α-2,9) between the monosaccharides, depending on the specific enzyme, while the trans-SA of the Trypanosoma family specifically acts on α-2,3 linked sialic acids (B) Alignment of four SAs (Influenza N1, C. perfringens NanI, T. cruzi trans-SA, H. sapiens NEU2) displaying the β-propeller structure with approximate six-fold symmetry highlighted in rainbow colours. The trans-SA transfer domain is shown in white. The active site is enlarged, showing oseltamivir bound in the active site. The highly conserved position of active site residues of Influenza (yellow), C. perfringens (orange), T. cruzi (red), and Human (blue) NAs, with corresponding numbering from influenza N1 (PDB IDs 3CL0, 5TSP, 2AH2, and 1VCU, respectively) (Amaya et al., 2004; Chavas et al., 2005; Collins et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2017) (C) Alignment of three human STs (ST3-GalNAcII, ST6-Gal-I, and ST8-SiaIII) displaying the conserved Rossman β-sheet architecture common to all STs (rainbow coloured) (PDB IDs: 6APL, 6QVT, and 5BO6, respectively). The active site is enlarged, showing CMP-Neu5Ac bound (Volkers et al., 2015; Moremen et al., 2018; Harrus et al., 2020). Figures created using PyMOL and ChemDraw.

The discovery of SA inhibitors has proven vital for targeting influenza, which has historically been responsible for devastating global pandemics. Even today, influenza accounts for between 300,000–650,000 deaths and costs the global economy billions of dollars every year (Putri et al., 2018; WHO, 2018). Almost 30 years after the first influenza SA inhibitors were discovered in the 1960s, an X-ray crystal structure of influenza SA with an inhibitor bound was solved (Edmond et al., 1966; Varghese et al., 1992). This structure provided an essential scaffold on which the following structure-based drug design would be built. A wealth of papers attempting to design drugs targeting influenza SA have been published since, with many successes.

However, SAs are not only encoded in viral genomes; they are also present in bacteria and many vertebrates including mammals. Whilst these enzymes have been explored less than their viral counterparts, it is evident that there are opportunities for new applications involving SA inhibitors. For example, Clostridium perfringens (the causative agent of gangrene) uses three SAs to aid its pathogenicity. The human parasite Trypanosoma cruzi uses a trans-SA as a major virulence factor to disguise it from host defences in Chagas disease.

SAs and their ST counterparts present in mammals, including humans, have opposing roles in diseases such as diabetes, cancer and atherosclerosis. All SAs share a strikingly similar β-propeller architecture composed of antiparallel β-sheets in an approximate six-fold symmetry, despite their low primary structure sequence identity (< 26%). However, SAs all possess a conserved arginine triad and catalytic tyrosine residue in the active site (Figure 1B). STs display a conserved Rossman fold, as is typical of many glycosyltransferases (Audry et al., 2011) (Figure 1C).

The design of inhibitors against these enzymes, both based on the sialic acid scaffold and other small molecule inhibitors, is key for the development of novel therapies and potent antibiotics, antivirals, and antiparasitic drugs. This review will aim to showcase the recent progress in design and discovery of such inhibitors, with a focus on inhibitors with a sialic acid-like scaffold, and will highlight new avenues for potential future research.

Viral Sialidase Inhibitors

It should be noted that several viruses of the Paramyxodivirdae family, such as Newcastle disease virus, Parainfluenza viruses, Mumps virus, and Sendai virus, encode a haemagglutinin-sialidase protein, however this review will only consider the Orthomyxoviridae influenza virus SA (Taylor, 1996). It should also be noted that only one example of a viral ST exists in the literature: a myxoma virus ST3-Gal-I, which has not been extensively studied (Jackson et al., 1999; Sugiarto et al., 2011). Influenza strains are identified by the homotetrameric SA type on their surface (groups N1-N9) and employ SAs to release new viral particles from infected cells by cleaving the host surface sialic acid (Itzstein, 2007). The structures of influenza SA [which belongs to glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 34 in the CAZy database (Lombard et al., 2014)], in complex with Neu5Ac (1) and with Neu5Ac2en (2), a potent inhibitor with a double bond in the pyranose ring, were reported in 1992 (Meindl et al., 1974; Varghese et al., 1992). The Neu5Ac2en scaffold (Figure 2A), which derives its potency by mimicking the oxocarbenium ion-like transition state, was used in the structure-based drug design of two anti-influenza drugs: oseltamivir (Tamiflu™, Roche and Gilead) and zanamivir (Relenza™, GlaxoSmithKline) (3 and 4) (Itzstein et al., 1993; Kim et al., 1997). Building on their success, peramivir (5), another potent influenza SA inhibitor, was designed using computational structure-based methods (Babu et al., 2000). Each of these drugs form extensive contacts with conserved residues in the SA active site, which out-compete terminal sialic acid residues on the host glycans, thus inhibiting the release of virus progeny from infected cells. Due to viral resistance against oseltamivir, peramivir was authorized by the FDA for emergency use in the swine flu pandemic of 2009 and was fully approved in 2014 (Thorlund et al., 2011; Wester et al., 2016). Peramivir highlighted two important requirements for designing Neu5Ac2en-related inhibitors; firstly the sugar ring conformation and secondly, the position of the attached groups to maximize binding in four conserved pockets (Babu et al., 2000). Peramivir contains an unusual 5-membered ring but retains high potency as its functional groups bind in a similar way to oseltamivir and zanamivir. Due to the rapid mutation rate of influenza, a plethora of mutant influenza subtypes are becoming increasingly resistant to the clinically available drugs (Hussain et al., 2017). The ever-present threat of an influenza pandemic is of particular concern and highlights the need for pre-emptive and effective novel inhibitor design.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(A) Sialic acid- and Neu5Ac2en-derived inhibitors of SAs and (B) CMP-Neu5Ac-derived inhibitors of STs discussed in the text. Colours surrounding each compound represent the organism they inhibit (see key); note that compounds 6, 13, 14, and 15 inhibit more than one organism and so both representative colours are shown. Individual substituents on the Neu5Ac or Neu5ac2en ring are colour coded to highlight changes to the scaffold.

More recent work by Vavricka and colleagues aimed to characterize the mechanism employed by SAs in hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond in order to design covalent inhibitors (Vavricka et al., 2013). 1H NMR and structural data of the Tyr406Asp mutant of Influenza N2 implicated Tyr406 as the catalytic nucleophile. The addition of fluorine at C2 and C3 of sialic acid allowed formation of a covalent adduct with the hydroxyl group of Tyr406, providing the first covalent SA inhibitor, 2α,3ax-difluoro-Neu5Ac (6) (Vavricka et al., 2013). Two groups independently reported compounds with sulphonate modifications to Neu5Ac displaying micromolar potency against viral SAs (Hadházi et al., 2017; Vavricka et al., 2017). The same modification was applied to zanamivir, replacing the carboxyl group, which enabled interactions with the conserved Arg triad, and resulted in low-nanomolar potency against Influenza SA (Hadházi et al., 2018). Although “α−sulphonozanamivir” (7) is not more potent than zanamivir against influenza SA, it is more selective, with approximately 20-fold lower inhibition of human SA.

Zanamivir is not the only approved drug to have been modified; oseltamivir has also been modified, with the aim of designing compounds with higher potency than oseltamivir itself, whilst limiting the likelihood of resistance developing. Addition at oseltamivir’s C1, aiming to target the 430-loop (an unused cavity of influenza SA that could accommodate potential new drug interactions), has yielded an amide-linked carboxylate with comparable in vivo efficacy to oseltamivir (8) (Ju et al., 2018). One novel and innovative modification sees a 32 Å polyglycol addition linking two oseltamivir monomers, forming “Divalent oseltamivir” (9). The cross-linking effect allows the occupancy of more than one SA active site in the tetramer and translates to a 68-fold increase in inhibitory potency in vitro compared to oseltamivir (Yan et al., 2019). This strategy is currently being explored as an exciting method of increasing drug potency and selectivity (as mammalian SAs are not tetrameric), breathing new life into compounds that are prone to resistance.

Bacterial Sialidase and Sialyltransferase Inhibitors

Multiple pathogenic bacterial species, including Vibrio cholera, Corynebacterium diptheriae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, utilize SAs for pathogenicity (Severi et al., 2007). However, Clostridium perfringens SAs (NanI, NanJ, and NanH) are probably the best studied and understood (Corfield, 1992). C. perfringens is pathogenic to humans and livestock, causing gangrene, necrotizing enteritis, and food poisoning, with disastrous health and economic implications throughout the world (Freedman et al., 2016).

The hydrolysis of host cell sialic acids by SAs from C. perfringens is key to its virulence and is thought to play roles in pathogenesis, including destruction of the intestinal cell barriers (Cioffi et al., 2012), promoting adhesion to the cell wall by reduction of negative charges (Li et al., 2011; Lewis and Lewis, 2012; Li and McClane, 2014) and using the sugars in metabolism to out-compete other bacteria (Corfield, 1992). The final and perhaps most vital function of the C. perfringens SAs is the ability to potentiate C. perfringens toxins, however the mechanism of this is unclear (Li et al., 2015a; Theoret et al., 2018). Interestingly, the three SAs, NanI, NanJ, and NanH (which all belong to family GH33 in the CAZy database), act synergistically on the hydrolysis of complex sialic acid-containing glycans, with substrate specificities of α-2,3, α-2,6, and α-2,8 linked sialic acids, respectively (Li and McClane, 2018). Neu5Ac2en has been used as the template for designing inhibitors against C. perfringens and V. cholera. This included an azido group modification at the C9 or C5 position to increase selectivity for bacterial over human SAs (10) (Khedri et al., 2012). These compounds displayed weak inhibition, but were improved in more recent work combining the aforementioned C2, C3-difluoro additions to produce a covalent inhibitor (11) (Li et al., 2019). Conjugation of a small peptide (1-4 residues) to the C9 position of Neu5Ac2en via a triazole linkage has been attempted and showed high selectivity for V. cholerae SA, with low micromolar IC50 values (12) (Slack et al., 2018).

S. pneumoniae expresses two SAs, NanA, and NanB (again family GH33), both of which have been implicated in a synergistic relationship during coinfection with influenza, potentiating, and exacerbating the effects of severe respiratory illness (McCullers and Rehg, 2002; Walther et al., 2016). This motivated investigation into the susceptibility of the bacterial SAs to the drugs oseltamivir and zanamivir, as well as two non-carbohydrate scaffold inhibitors, artocarpin, and katsumadain A (Walther et al., 2016). Only the non-carbohydrate inhibitors had the ability to inhibit both influenza and S. pneumoniae SAs, enabling disruption of this synergism. Other non-carbohydrate scaffolds including a Curcumin derivative, Diplacone (a naturally occurring flavanoid), and the commonly used buffering agent 2-CHES, have also been explored as compounds with potential inhibitory activity toward bacterial SAs (Lee et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2017; Kim and Park, 2018). The aforementioned α-sulphonate modifications to the anomeric carbon of Neu5Ac have also been shown to be effective against both S. pneumoniae and C. perfringens SAs (13) (Vavricka et al., 2017).

A handful of pathogenic bacteria express STs as virulence factors to produce molecular mimics of mammalian glycans, thus evading the host immune system by adding terminal sialic acid residues to their lipooligosccharides. For example, two pathogens of the genus Neisseria (N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae) encode crucial poly-STs (family GT38) that adds α-2,8 and α-2,9 linked sialic acid chains to the extracellular capsule of these Gram-negative bacteria, mimicking mammalian poly sialic acid glycans (Bhattacharjee et al., 1975). N. meningitidis synthesizes Neu5Ac de novo, whereas N. gonorrhoeae scavenges the mammalian nucleotide sugar donor (Smith et al., 1995; Vogel et al., 1996). Haemophilus influenzae uses an α-2,3 ST which is essential for virulence in otitis media infections (Bouchet et al., 2003). Several groups have published structures of Campylobacter jejuni and Pasturella multocida STs, among other prokaryotes, however limited examples exist of inhibitor design against bacterial STs (Figure 2B) (Chiu et al., 2007; Ni et al., 2007). The general purpose ST inhibitor CMP-3Fax-Neu5Ac (CMP-Neu5Ac with an axial fluorine at C3 of sialic acid) (14) displays moderate inhibitory strength toward bacterial STs, with a K i of ∼25 µM (Ni et al., 2007). Kumar et al. attempted to discard the scissile phosphate in favour of a selection of uncharged amide-, sulphonamide- and triazole-linked compounds, incorporating Neu5Ac, Neu5Ac2en and substituted benzene moieties. Unfortunately, these compounds all displayed relatively low inhibition. Swapping Neu5Ac for a benzene group has also been integrated in the design of fluorescent probes targeting STs, with several of these probes achieving nanomolar inhibition against P. multocida ST, including the non-fluorescent precursor scaffold (15) (Preidl et al., 2014).

Trypanosome Trans-Sialidase Inhibitors

Parasitic protozoans of the Trypanosoma genus are responsible for extremely debilitating and life-threatening illnesses—African sleeping sickness and Chagas disease—for millions of people in less economically developed countries (World Health Organisation, 2020a; World Health Organisation, 2020b). These single-celled organisms spread through the bite of an insect vector and result in circulation of the parasite in the host’s blood (Radwanska et al., 2018). Ordinarily, such foreign material would be suppressed by the immune system, however, trypanosomes encode a crucial virulence factor (a trans-SA, belonging to family GH33) which is partly responsible for evasion from this system (Nardy et al., 2016). This enzyme is a glycoside hydrolase; however, the enzyme promotes nucleophilic attack by a glycan rather than a water molecule, and thus acts as a synthetic enzyme. The trans-SA cleaves sialic acids from host cells and covalently attaches them to terminal β-galactose acceptor molecules on the surface of the parasite, effectively masking itself in pseudo-host tissue. The inability to clear this parasite results in the establishment of chronic infection. The absence of a trans-SA in humans has established it as a promising drug target.

It is advantageous to target both the donor and acceptor sites of the trans-SA to ensure inhibition (Buschiazzo et al., 2002). To this end, a group of unusual triazole linked sialic acid and galactose disaccharides were devised in one study, resulting in a lead compound with µM potency against T. cruzi trans-SA (16) (Campo et al., 2012). More recently, multivalent sugar syntheses were attempted to find new trypanosome trans-SA inhibitors, with the most successful compound (17, a tetra-sialic acid conjugate) exhibiting 99% inhibition at 1 mM and an IC50 of 450 µM (Figueredo et al., 2019). Unfortunately, the inclusion of multiple sugars is likely to give poor absorbance and low bioavailability, highlighting the need for further research.

A wealth of other non-Neu5Ac-derived inhibitors have been designed and discovered recently which target the trans-SA. This included a search of 3180 FDA approved drugs with hopes for repurposing, benzyl β-lactoside analogues and a fragment-based screening approach based on aryl propionic acid (Lara-Ramirez et al., 2017; Kashif et al., 2018; Morrone-Pozzuto et al., 2019). One particular notable compound is a pthaloyl derivative with a predicted K d of 7.2 nM (Neu5Ac2en has a predicted K d of 1.9 µM) and close to 90% trypanocidal activity, which is comparable with current drugs on the market. This compound is predicted by virtual screening to use the naphthalene and indoline rings to make extensive contacts with surrounding hydrophobic residues in the active site, although this needs to be validated experimentally (Kashif et al., 2018).

Human Sialidase and Sialyltransferase Inhibitors

In the body, STs and SAs are responsible for the addition and removal of sialic acids, respectively, from the termini of glycans presented on the surface of cells. The equilibrium between the opposing roles of these enzymes allows remodelling of the extracellular glycans and is important in many diseases (Pearce and Heinz, 2015). Four SA isozymes are encoded in the human genome termed NEU1—4 (belonging to family GH33), which differ in cellular expression and localization (Lipničanová et al., 2020). Unfortunately, NEU2 is the only human SA with its structure solved, due to the inability to grow adequate crystals of the membrane bound NEU1, 3, and 4 (Chavas et al., 2005). The roles of these SAs have been implicated in various studies to be important in cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases (Dridi et al., 2013; Shiga et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019). For example, NEU3 has been implicated in the hydrolysis of sialic acid from GM3 (a common sialic acid-containing glycosphingolipid). This desialylation allows GM3 to become a ligand for the EGFR receptor and increases ERK and AKT phosphorylation, all of which have strong links to various cancers and tumorigenesis (Bonardi et al., 2014; Mozzi et al., 2015). Excessive sialylation caused by deficient levels of NEU1 may cause abnormal accumulation of amyloid precursor protein, which is known to initiate the formation of fibrils and plaques of Amyloid β (Aβ) and Tau proteins in Alzheimer’s disease (Annunziata et al., 2013). Furthermore, the accumulation of Aβ and Tau fibrils has recently been linked to increased desialylation of microglial cells, leading to enhanced phagocytosis of healthy neurons and further propagates the negative effects on memory (Allendorf et al., 2020; Puigdellívol et al., 2020). Minami et al. showed that the upregulation of SA activity improves hippocampal memory processing, which may provide a potential treatment for neurodegenerative diseases (Minami et al., 2017).

Although many of the aforementioned inhibitors targeting pathogens display weak inhibition of the human SAs, the lack of potent and highly specific inhibitors to aid research has hindered further progress in understanding the roles played by SAs in diseases. The most promising recent efforts to produce a human SA inhibitor built on previous work involving modification of Neu5Ac2en at C9 (Albohy et al., 2013). The best compound included a large biaryl moiety linked by a triazole at C9 of Neu5Ac2en (18), which conferred 15-fold higher selectivity for human NEU3 than the compound with just the triazole alone, and had a high nanomolar IC50 value (Guo et al., 2018a). The same group has also recently developed highly selective NEU1 and NEU2 inhibitors with a range of C4, C5, and C9 additions (Guo et al., 2018b). To date, these compounds represent the best tools available for research to elucidate the roles of human SAs in disease.

Humans also express 20 different, but evolutionarily related, STs, separated into three classes based on the position of the linkage between sialic acid and the rest of the glycan (α-2,3, α-2,6, or α-2,8; all belong to family GT29) (Tsuji et al., 1996; Harduin-Lepers, 2010; Lombard et al., 2014) Altered cell sialylation and upregulation of STs have been observed in many cancers and the development of metastases, including oral (Vajaria et al., 2018), liver (Dall’Olio et al., 2004), breast (Picco et al., 2010), stomach (Cebi et al., 2016), cervical (López-Morales et al., 2009) and ovarian cancers (Wang et al., 2005), among others. Using a genome-wide association study, downregulation of a polysialyltransferase (ST8-Sia-II) was found to be a potential susceptibility gene for several mental illnesses such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (McAuley et al., 2012). ST6-Gal-I has been heavily studied in relation to cancer [reviewed recently by Garnham et al. (2019)], with multiple studies correlating its expression to increased aggressiveness of tumours and metastases. In one instance, the death receptor Fas, which plays a key role in apoptosis, was found to be a target of abnormal sialylation by ST6-Gal-I. This appeared to downregulate the apoptotic effects of Fas, resulting in diminished activation of caspases 3 and 8, thus contributing to the “Resisting Cell Death” hallmark of cancer (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000; Swindall and Bellis, 2011). Furthermore, the heightened tumour cell surface sialylation is an important characteristic of resistance to certain cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs (vincristine and nilotinib), suggesting that inhibition of sialyltransferases may be an effective method of re-sensitizing cancerous cells to such drugs (Parameswaran et al., 2013).

Only a handful of human ST structures exist, due to difficulties successfully crystallizing these enzymes, as they are often membrane bound proteins. The first ST structure was reported in 2013 (Kuhn et al., 2013; Volkers et al., 2015; Harrus et al., 2020). This has no doubt hindered the structure-based design of potent ST inhibitors when compared to the viral SA inhibitors. Human ST inhibitors that mimic the natural substrate are composed of three components which may be modified: the cytosine base, phosphate and sialic acid. The general-purpose ST inhibitor CMP-3Fax-Neu5Ac (15) displays a K i in the low µM range against hST6-Gal-I (the most studied and targeted human ST) (Burkart et al., 2000). Skropeta and Yu’s research group have improved this drastically, publishing several papers recently to highlight tighter binding inhibitors. Many of these included α-hydroxyphosphonates in place of the carboxyl C1 as transition state analogue mimics, with later compounds also including uncharged carbamate and triazole linkers to improve potential pharmacokinetic properties (Skropeta et al., 2004; Montgomery et al., 2016; Montgomery et al., 2017). The most recent inhibitors designed by this group incorporate a benzene scaffold in place of the sialic acid (similar to the bacterial ST inhibitors) and also exchange the cytosine for a 5′-deoxy-uridine ring (19). The current lead compound from this group is a phenoxy-substituted compound (20) with a 19 nM K i value against hST6-Gal-I. Other groups have also developed potent inhibitors of hST6-Gal-I, with simple benzene amide linked compounds intending to mimic the double bond character of the oxocarbenium transition state (21, K i = 16 nM), cyclopentane scaffold compounds in place of the sialic acid, similar to peramivir (22, K i = 28 nM), and the aforementioned fluorescent probe (23, K i = 9 nM) (Li et al., 2015b ; Preidl et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2017).

Alternative methods of inhibition have been explored such as bisubstrate inhibitors (which aim to mimic the product of the ST by incorporating two or more sugars linked by thioethers or a phosphate), swapping the cytosine for 5-fluoro uracil or adenine, or modifying the cytosine with a methyl group (Hinou et al., 2002; Nakahara et al., 2004; Izumi et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2006; Miyazaki et al., 2008). A major hurdle with many glycosyltransferase inhibitors is their poor adherence to criteria for a drug candidate, with a high molecular weight, an excessive number of hydrogen bond donors/acceptors and sometimes the presence of a negative charge (Lipinski, 2004). Metabolic inhibitors of STs offer a promising solution, hijacking the cell’s usual synthetic routes to create the desired inhibitors in vivo, thus bypassing the need to sacrifice potency for adequate pharmacokinetic properties. However, further research is necessary to validate this method and assess the selectivity of the inhibitors for a particular enzyme (Rillahan et al., 2012). It should also be noted that the inhibition of ST8-Sia-III in the brain of mice impairs their procedural long-term memory, so characterizing the specificities of inhibitors targeting STs should be a future area of research (Rinflerch et al., 2013).

Although beyond the scope of this review, there are natural products, or natural product-like, compounds that inhibit SAs and STs. For example, soybean derived soyasaponin has been shown to inhibit cancer metastasis in vivo, which inspired the synthesis of lithocholic acid analogues. One cell permeable analogue attenuated α-2,3-sialylation on cell surface glycans, and was demonstrated to suppress metastasis of lung cancer cells by inhibiting modification of integrin-β1, thus impacting the FAK/paxillin/Rho signalling pathways (Chen et al., 2011). A more extensive review of other classes of ST inhibitors can be found in an article by Wang et al. (2016).

Concluding Remarks

This review has displayed the breadth of novel SA and ST inhibitors currently being developed, particularly highlighting the recent iterative successes of using the Neu5Ac2en and Neu5Ac frameworks for new inhibitor design and concepts. The presence of SAs and STs across the domains of life and viruses highlights the need for selective and potent compounds. Structural, mechanistic, and computational information is essential to guide this design process. Several challenges exist for ST inhibition: not only in obtaining protein for the necessary in vitro studies, but also if incorporation of a negative charge and several polar groups in CMP-sialic acid mimics will be conducive to cell uptake and oral bioavailability. The critical roles that STs play in the progression of some human cancers, however, means research in this area is of great importance. Whilst there have been drugs in the clinic targeting viral SAs for over 2 decades, the need for new inhibitors is critical due to the ever-looming threats of pathogenic resistance and pandemics. The improvement of existing compounds presented here, and success in the design of novel compounds, will ensure preparedness in the face of these future challenges.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed to the conception of the article and editing; WB drafted the article and drew figures.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Albohy A., Zhang Y., Smutova V., Pshezhetsky A. V., Cairo C. W. (2013). Identification of Selective Nanomolar Inhibitors of the Human Neuraminidase, NEU4. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 4 (6), 532–537. 10.1021/ml400080t [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allendorf D. H., Puigdellívol M., Brown G. C. (2020). Activated Microglia Desialylate Their Surface, Stimulating Complement Receptor 3‐mediated Phagocytosis of Neurons. Glia 68 (5), 989–998. 10.1002/glia.23757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amaya M. F., Watts A. G., Damager I., Wehenkel A., Nguyen T., Buschiazzo A., et al. (2004). Structural Insights into the Catalytic Mechanism of Trypanosoma Cruzi Trans-sialidase. Structure 12 (5), 775–784. 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Annunziata I., Patterson A., Helton D., Hu H., Moshiach S., Gomero E., et al. (2013). Lysosomal NEU1 Deficiency Affects Amyloid Precursor Protein Levels and Amyloid-β Secretion via Deregulated Lysosomal Exocytosis. Nat. Commun. 4. 10.1038/ncomms3734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Audry M., Jeanneau C., Imberty A., Harduin-Lepers A., Delannoy P., Breton C. (2011). Current Trends in the Structure-Activity Relationships of Sialyltransferases. Glycobiology 21 (6), 716–726. 10.1093/glycob/cwq189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Babu Y. S., Chand P., Bantia S., Kotian P., Dehghani A., El-Kattan Y., et al. (2000). BCX-1812 (RWJ-270201): Discovery of a Novel, Highly Potent, Orally Active, and Selective Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitor through Structure-Based Drug Design. J. Med. Chem. 43 (19), 3482–3486. 10.1021/jm0002679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhattacharjee A. K., Jennings H. J., Kenny C. P., Martin A., Smith I. C. (1975). Structural Determination of the Sialic Acid Polysaccharide Antigens of Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroups B and C with Carbon 13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Biol. Chem. 250 (5), 1926–1932. 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)41784-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonardi D., Papini N., Pasini M., Dileo L., Orizio F., Monti E., et al. (2014). Sialidase NEU3 Dynamically Associates to Different Membrane Domains Specifically Modifying Their Ganglioside Pattern and Triggering AKT Phosphorylation. PLoS ONE 9 (6), e99405–13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0099405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouchet V., Hood D. W., Li J., Brisson J.-R., Randle G. A., Martin A., et al. (2003). Host-Derived Sialic Acid Is Incorporated into Haemophilus Influenzae Lipopolysaccharide and Is a Major Virulence Factor in Experimental Otitis Media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100 (15), 8898–8903. 10.1073/pnas.1432026100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burkart M. D., Vincent S. P., Düffels A., Murray B. W., Steven V. L., Wong C.-H. (2000). Chemo-Enzymatic Synthesis of Fluorinated Sugar Nucleotide: Useful Mechanistic Probes for Glycosyltransferases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8 (8), 1937–1946. 10.1016/S0968-0896(00)00139-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buschiazzo A., Amaya M. F., Cremona M. L., Frasch A. C., Alzari P. M. (2002). The Crystal Structure and Mode of Action of Trans-sialidase, a Key Enzyme in Trypanosoma Cruzi Pathogenesis. Mol. Cel 10 (4), 757–768. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00680-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campo V. L., Sesti-Costa R., Carneiro Z. A., Silva J. S., Schenkman S., Carvalho I. (2012). Design, Synthesis and the Effect of 1,2,3-Triazole Sialylmimetic Neoglycoconjugates on Trypanosoma Cruzi and its Cell Surface Trans-sialidase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20 (1), 145–156. 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cebi A., Mert H., Mert N. (2016). Evaluation of Some Tumor Markers, Acute Phase Proteins, Sialic Acid and Lipid Bound Sialic Acid before and after Chemotherapy in Stomach Cancer. Med. Sci. Discov. 3 (1), 22–27. 10.17546/msd.39424 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chavas L. M., Tringali C., Fusi P., Venerando B., Tettamanti G., Kato R., et al. (2005). Crystal Structure of the Human Cytosolic Sialidase Neu2. Evidence for the Dynamic Nature of Substrate Recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (1), 469–475. 10.1074/jbc.M411506200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen J.-Y., Tang Y. A., Huang S. M., Juan H. F., Wu L. W., Sun Y. C., et al. (2011). A Novel Sialyltransferase Inhibitor Suppresses FAK/Paxillin Signaling and Cancer Angiogenesis and Metastasis Pathways. Cancer Res. 71 (2), 473–483. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chiu P. C., Lairson L., Gilbert M., Wakarchuk W., Withers S. G., Strynadka N. C. J. (2007). Structural Analysis of the α-2,3-Sialyltransferase Cst-I from Campylobacter Jejuni in Apo and Substrate-Analogue Bound Forms. Biochemistry 46 (24), 7196–7204. 10.1021/bi602543d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cioffi D. L., Pandey S., Alvarez D. F., Cioff E. A. (2012). Terminal Sialic Acids Are an Important Determinant of Pulmonary Endothelial Barrier Integrity. Am. J. Physiol. - Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 302 (10), 1067–1077. 10.1152/ajplung.00190.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins P. J., Lesley F., Junfeng L., Rupert J., RussellSkehel P. A. W., John J., et al. (2008). Crystal Structures of Oseltamivir-Resistant Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Mutants. Nature 453 (7199), 1258–1261. 10.1038/nature06956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Corfield T. (1992). Bacterial Sialidases - Roles in Pathogenicity and Nutrition. Glycobiology 2 (6), 509–521. 10.1093/glycob/2.6.509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dall’Olio Fabio., Chiricolo Mariella., D’Errico Antonia., Gruppioni Elisa., Altimari Annalisa., Fiorentino Michelangelo., et al. (2004). Expression of Beta-Galactoside Alpha2,6 Sialyltransferase and of Alpha2,6-Sialylated Glycoconjugates in Normal Human Liver, Hepatocarcinoma, and Cirrhosis. Glycobiology 14 (1), 39–49. 10.1111/pin.12834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dridi Larbi., Seyrantepe Volkan., Fougerat Anne., Pan Xuefang., Bonneil Éric., Thibault Pierre., et al. (2013). Positive Regulation of Insulin Signaling by Neuraminidase 1. Diabetes 62 (7), 2338–2346. 10.2337/db12-1825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Edmond J. D., Johnston R. G., Kidd D., Rylance H. J., Sommerville R. G. (1966). The Inhibition of Neuraminidase and Antiviral Action. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 27 (2), 415–426. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01673.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Figueredo Andreza. S., De Andrade Peterson., Riul Thalita. B., MarchioriThais Canassa De Leo Marcelo. F., Fleuri Anna. Karoline. A., Schenkman Sérgio., et al. (2019). Galactosyl and Sialyl Clusters: Synthesis and Evaluation against T. Cruzi Parasite. Pure Appl. Chem. 91 (7), 1191–1207. 10.1515/pac-2019-0216 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Freedman John. C., Shrestha Archana., McClane Bruce. A. (2016). Clostridium Perfringens Enterotoxin: Action, Genetics, and Translational Applications. Toxins 8 (73), 1–16. 10.3390/toxins8030073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Garnham Rebecca., Scott Emma., Livermore Karen. E., Munkley Jennifer. (2019). ST6GAL1: A Key Player in Cancer. Oncol. Lett. 18 (2), 983–989. 10.3892/ol.2019.10458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo Jian., Li Wenming., Xue Weiwei., Ye Xin. Shan. (2017). Transition State-Based Sialyltransferase Inhibitors: Mimicking Oxocarbenium Ion by Simple Amide. J. Med. Chem. 60 (5), 2135–2141. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo Tianlin., Dätwyler Philipp., Demina Ekaterina., Richards Michele. R., Peng Ge., Zou Chunxia., et al. (2018a). Selective Inhibitors of Human Neuraminidase 3. J. Med. Chem. 61 (5), 1990–2008. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo Tianlin., Héon-Roberts Rachel., Zou Chunxia., Zheng Ruixiang., Pshezhetsky Alexey. V., Cairo Christopher. W. (2018b). Selective Inhibitors of Human Neuraminidase 1 (NEU1). J. Med. Chem. 61 (24), 11261–11279. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hadházi Ádám., Li Linghui., Bailly Benjamin., Maggioni Andrea., Martin Gael., Dirr Larissa., et al. (2018). A Sulfonozanamivir Analogue Has Potent Anti-influenza Virus Activity. ChemMedChem 13 (8), 785–789. 10.1002/cmdc.201800092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hadházi Ádám., Pascolutti Mauro., Bailly Benjamin., Dyason Jeffrey. C., Borbás Anikó., Thomson Robin. J., et al. (2017). A Sialosyl Sulfonate as a Potent Inhibitor of Influenza Virus Replication. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15 (25), 5249–5253. 10.1039/c7ob00947j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hanahan Douglas., Weinberg Robert. A. (2000). The Hallmarks of Cancer. Cell 100, 57–70. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harduin-Lepers A. (2010). Comprehensive Analysis of Sialyltransferases in Vertebrate Genomes. Glycobiology Insights 2 (April), 29–61. 10.4137/gbi.s3123 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Harrus Deborah., Harduin-Lepers Anne., Glumoff Tuomo. (2020). Unliganded and CMP-Neu5Ac Bound Structures of Human α-2,6-Sialyltransferase ST6Gal I at High Resolution. J. Struct. Biol. 212 (August), 1–8. 10.1101/2020.06.07.138503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hinou Hiroshi., Sun Xue. Long., Ito Yukishige. (2002). Bisubstrate-Type Inhibitor of Sialyltransferases. Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (50), 9147–9150. 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)02272-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hussain Mazhar., Galvin Henry. D., Tatt Y., Nutsford Ashley. N., Husain Matloob. (2017). Drug Resistance in Influenza a Virus: The Epidemiology and Management. Infect. Drug Resist. 10, 121–134. 10.2147/IDR.S105473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Itzstein Mark. Von., Wen Yang., Kok Gaik. B., Pegg Michael. S., Dyason Jeffrey. C., Jin Betty., et al. (1993). Rational Design of Potent Sialidase-Based Inhibitors of Influenza Virus Replication. Nature 363 (6428), 418–423. 10.1038/363418a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Itzstein Mark. von. (2007). The War against Influenza: Discovery and Development of Sialidase Inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6 (12), 967–974. 10.1038/nrd2400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Izumi Masayuki., Wada Katsuhiro., Yuasa Hideya., Hashimoto Hironobu. (2005). Synthesis of Bisubstrate and Donor Analogues of Sialyltransferase and Their Inhibitory Activities. J. Org. Chem. 70 (22), 8817–8824. 10.1021/jo0512608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jackson Ronald. J., Hall Diana. F., Kerr Peter. J. (1999). Myxoma Virus Encodes an Α2,3-Sialyltransferase that Enhances Virulence. J. Virol. 73 (3), 2376–2384. 10.1128/jvi.73.3.2376-2384.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ju Han., Zhang Jian., Sun Zhuosen., Huang Zheng., Qi Wenbao., Huang Bing. (2018). European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Discovery of C-1 Modi Fi. in Oseltamivir Derivatives as Potent in Fl Uenza Neuraminidase Inhibitors”, 146, 220–231. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kashif M., Chacón-Vargas K. F., López-Cedillo J. C., Nogueda-Torres B., Alma D., Paz-González A. D., et al. (2018). Synthesis, Molecular Docking and Biological Evaluation of Novel Phthaloyl Derivatives of 3-Amino-3-Aryl Propionic Acids as Inhibitors of Trypanosoma Cruzi Trans-sialidase. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 156, 252–268. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Khedri Zahra., Li Yanhong., Cao Hongzhi., Qu Jingyao., Yu Hai., Muthana M. M., et al. (2012). Synthesis of Selective Inhibitors against V. Cholerae Sialidase and Human Cytosolic Sialidase NEU2. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10 (30), 6112–6120. 10.1039/c2ob25335f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim B. R., Park Ji. Y., Jeong H. J., Kwon H. J., Park S. J., Lee I. C. (2018). Chul Lee, Young Bae Ryu, and Woo Song LeeDesign, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Curcumin Analogues as Potential Inhibitors of Bacterial Sialidase. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 33 (1), 1256–1265. 10.1080/14756366.2018.1488695, In [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim Choung. U., Willard Lew., Williams Matthew. A., Liu Hongtao., Zhang Lijun., Swaminathan S., et al. (1997). Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitors Possessing a Novel Hydrophobic Interaction in the Enzyme Active Site: Design, Synthesis, and Structural Analysis of Carbocyclic Sialic Acid Analogues with Potent Anti-influenza Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (4), 681–690. 10.1021/ja963036t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kuhn Bernd., Benz Jörg., Greif Michael., Engel Alfred. M., Sobek Harald., Rudolph Markus. G. (2013). The Structure of Human -2,6-Sialyltransferase Reveals the Binding Mode of Complex Glycans. Acta Crystallogr. Section D: Biol. Crystallogr. 69 (9), 1826–1838. 10.1107/S0907444913015412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lara-Ramirez E., Kashif M., Garcia-Perez Carlos., Agusti Rosalía., Laura Uhrig María., Rivera Gildardo. (2017). An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of New Potential Trans-sialidase Inhibitors of Trypanosoma Cruzi Predicted by a Computational Drug Repositioning Method. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 132, 249–261. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.03.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee Lenselot., Chang Kai. H., Valiyev Famil., Liu Hsing. J., Wen S. (2006). “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 5′‐Triazole Nucleosides. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 53 (4), 1547–1555. 10.1002/jccs.200600202 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee Y., Jung G., An J. Y., Park K. R., Jung Y., Young B., et al. (2017). Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Clostridium Perfringens Neuraminidase in Complex with a Non-carbohydrate-based Inhibitor, 2-(Cyclohexylamino)Ethanesulfonic Acid. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 486 (2), 470–475. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee Youngjin., Young Bae., Jung Keun., Young Min., Young Park J. i., Hyun Eom S. (2014). Structural Basis of Sialidase in Complex with Geranylated Flavonoids as Potent Natural Inhibitors. Acta Crystallogr. Section D: Biol. Crystallogr. 70 (5), 1357–1365. 10.1107/S1399004714002971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lewis Amanda. L., Lewis. Warren. G. (2012). Host Sialoglycans and Bacterial Sialidases: A Mucosal Perspective. Cell Microbiol. 14 (8), 1174–1182. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01807.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li J., McClane B. A. (2018). NanI Sialidase Can Support the Growth and Survival of Clostridium Perfringens Strain F4969 in the Presence of Sialyated Host Macromolecules (Mucin) or Caco-2 Cells. Infect. Immun. 86 (2), 1–14. 10.1128/IAI.00547-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li Jihong., Freedman John. C., McClane Bruce. A. (2015a). NanI Sialidase, CcpA, and CodY Work Together to Regulate Epsilon Toxin Production by Clostridium Perfringens Type D Strain CN3718. J. Bacteriol. 197 (20), 3339–3353. 10.1128/JB.00349-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li Jihong., McClane Bruce. A. (2014). The Sialidases of Clostridium Perfringens Type D Strain CN3718 Differ in Their Properties and Sensitivities to Inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80 (5), 1701–1709. 10.1128/AEM.03440-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Li J., Sayeed S, Robertson S., Chen J., McClane B. A. (2011). Sialidases Affect the Host Cell Adherence and Epsilon Toxin-Induced Cytotoxicity of Clostridium Perfringens Type D Strain CN3718. PLoS Pathog. 7 (12), 1–20. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li W., Santra A., Yu H., Slack T. J., Muthana M. M., Shi D., et al. (2019). 9-Azido-9-Deoxy-2,3-Difluorosialic Acid as a Subnanomolar Inhibitor against Bacterial Sialidases. J. Org. Chem. 84 (11), 6697–6708. 10.1021/acs.joc.9b00385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li W., Niu Y., De C., Cao X., Ye X. S. (2015b). Highly Substituted Cyclopentane-CMP Conjugates as Potent Sialyltransferase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58 (20), 7972–7990. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lipinski C. A. (2004). Lead- and Drug-like Compounds: The Rule-Of-Five Revolution. Drug Discov. Today Tech. 1 (4), 337–341. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lipničanová S., Chmelová D., Ondrejovič M., Frecer V., Miertuš S. (2020). “Diversity of Sialidases Found in the Human Body – A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules 148, 857–868. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lombard V., Golaconda Ramulu H., Drula E., Coutinho P. M., Bernard H. (2014). The Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (D1), 490–495. 10.1093/nar/gkt1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. López-Morales D., Velázquez-Márquez N., Valenzuela Olivia., Gerardo Santos-López., Reyes-Leyva Julio., Vallejo-Ruiz Verónica. (2009). Enhanced Sialyltransferases Transcription in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Clin. Invest. 50 (1), 45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. McAuley Erica. Z., Anna Scimone., Tiwari Yash., Agahi Giti., Bryan J., Mowry E. G. H., et al. (2012). Identification of Sialyltransferase 8B as a Generalized Susceptibility Gene for Psychotic and Mood Disorders on Chromosome 15q25-26. PLoS ONE 7 (5). 10.1371/journal.pone.0038172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. McCullers Jonathan. A., Rehg Jerold. E. (2002). Lethal Synergism between Influenza Virus and Streptococcus Pneumoniae: Characterization of a Mouse Model and the Role of Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor. J. Infect. Dis. 186 (3), 341–350. 10.1086/341462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Meindl P., Bodo G., Palese P., Schulman J., Tuppy H. (1974). Inhibition of Neuraminidase Activity by Derivatives of 2-Deoxy-2,3-Dehydro-N-Acetylneuraminic Acid. Virology 58 (2), 457–463. 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90080-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Minami Akira., Meguro Yuko., Ishibashi Sayaka., Ishii Ami., Shiratori Mako., Sai Saki., et al. (2017). Rapid Regulation of Sialidase Activity in Response to Neural Activity and Sialic Acid Removal during Memory Processing in Rat Hippocampus. J. Biol. Chem. 292 (14), 5645–5654. 10.1074/jbc.M116.764357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Miyazaki Tatsuo., Angata Kiyohiko., Seeberger Peter. H., Hindsgaul Ole., Fukuda Minoru. (2008). CMP Substitutions Preferentially Inhibit Polysialic Acid Synthesis. Glycobiology 18 (2), 187–194. 10.1093/glycob/cwm132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Montgomery Andrew., Skropeta Danielle., Yu Haibo. (2017). Transition State-Based ST6Gal I Inhibitors: Mimicking the Phosphodiester Linkage with a Triazole or Carbamate through an Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation. Nat. Scientific Rep. 7 (14428), 1–11. 10.1002/jmr.2520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Montgomery Andrew., Szabo Rémi., Skropeta Danielle., Yu Haibo. (2016). Computational Characterisation of the Interactions between Human ST6Gal I and Transition-State Analogue Inhibitors: Insights for Inhibitor Design. J. Mol. Recognition 29 (5), 210–222. 10.1002/jmr.2520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Moremen Kelley. W., Ramiah Annapoorani., Stuart Melissa., Steel Jason., Lu Meng., Forouhar Farhad., et al. (2018). Expression System for Structural and Functional Studies of Human Glycosylation Enzymes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14 (2), 156–162. 10.1038/nchembio.2539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Morrone-Pozzuto P., Uhrig M. L., Agusti R. (2019). Trypanosoma Cruzi Trans-sialidase Alternative Substrates: Study of the Effect of Substitution in C-6 in Benzyl β-Lactoside. Carbohydr. Res. 478 (February), 33–45. 10.1016/j.carres.2019.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mozzi Alessandra., Forcella Matilde., Riva Alice., Difrancesco Carlotta., Molinari Francesca., Martin Vittoria., et al. (2015). NEU3 Activity Enhances EGFR Activation without a Ff Ecting EGFR Expression and Acts on its Sialylation Levels. Glycobiology 25 (8), 855–868. 10.1093/glycob/cwv026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nakahara S., Tanaka T., Noguchi K., Nozaki K., Tsuji S., Miura T., et al. (2004). Synthesis of CMP-Sialic Acid Mimics Containing 5-Fluoro Uracil for Cytosine and C-Terminal Peptide for the Phosphate Group. Heterocycles 63 (4), 779–784. 10.3987/com-04-10196 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nardy Ana. F. F. R., Celio G., Freire-de-Lima Ana. R. Pérez., Alexandre Morrot. (2016). Role of Trypanosoma Cruzi Trans-sialidase on the Escape from Host Immune Surveillance. Front. Microbiol. 7 (MAR), 1–9. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ni Lisheng., Chokhawala Harshal. A., Cao Hongzhi., Ryan Henning., Ng Laura., Huang Shengshu., et al. (2007). Crystal Structures of Pasteurella Multocida Sialyltransferase Complexes with Acceptor and Donor Analogues Reveal Substrate Binding Sites and Catalytic Mechanism. Biochemistry 46 (21), 6288–6298. 10.1021/bi700346w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Parameswaran Reshmi., Lim Min., Anna Arutyunyan., Abdel-Azim Hisham., Hurtz Christian., Lau Kam., et al. (2013). O-acetylated N-Acetylneuraminic Acid as a Novel Target for Therapy in Human Pre-b Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Exp. Med. 210 (4), 805–819. 10.1084/jem.20121482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pearce Oliver. M. T., Heinz Läubli. (2015). Sialic Acids in Cancer Biology and Immunity. Glycobiology 26 (2), 111–128. 10.1093/glycob/cwv097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Picco Gianfranco., Julien Sylvain., Brockhausen Inka., Beatson Richard., Antonopoulos Aristotelis., Haslam Stuart., et al. (2010). Over-Expression of ST3Gal-I Promotes Mammary Tumorigenesis. Glycobiology 20 (10), 1241–1250. 10.1093/glycob/cwq085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Preidl Johannes. J., Gnanapragassam Vinayaga. S., Lisurek Michael., Saupe Jörn., Horstkorte Rüdiger., Rademann Jörg. (2014). Fluorescent Mimetics of CMP-Neu5Ac Are Highly Potent, Cell-Permeable Polarization Probes of Eukaryotic and Bacterial Sialyltransferases and Inhibit Cellular Sialylation. Angew. Chem. - Int. Edition 53 (22), 5700–5705. 10.1002/anie.201400394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Puigdellívol Mar., Allendorf David. H., Brown Guy. C. (2020). Sialylation and Galectin-3 in Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration. Front. Cell Neurosci. 14 (June), 1–11. 10.3389/fncel.2020.00162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Putri Wayan. C. W. S., Muscatello David. J., Stockwell Melissa. S., Newall Anthony. T. (2018). Economic Burden of Seasonal Influenza in the United States. Vaccine 36 (27), 3960–3966. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Radwanska Magdalena., Vereecke Nick., Deleeuw Violette., Pinto Joar., Magez Stefan. (2018). Salivarian Trypanosomosis: A Review of Parasites Involved, Their Global Distribution and Their Interaction with the Innate and Adaptive Mammalian Host Immune System. Front. Immunol. 9 (OCT), 1–20. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rillahan Cory. D., Antonopoulos Aristotelis., Lefort Craig. T., Sonon Roberto., Azadi Parastoo., Ley Klaus., et al. (2012). Global Metabolic Inhibitors of Sialyl- and Fucosyltransferases Remodel the Glycome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8 (7), 661–668. 10.1038/nchembio.999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Rinflerch Adriana. R., Burgos Valeria. L., Ielpi Marcelo., Marcos Ojea., Hidalgo Alejandra. M., Loresi Monica., et al. (2013). Inhibition of Brain ST8SiaIII Sialyltransferase Leads to Impairment of Procedural Memory in Mice. Neurochem. Int. 63 (5), 397–404. 10.1016/j.neuint.2013.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Severi Emmanuele., Hood Derek. W., Thomas Gavin. H. (2007). Sialic Acid Utilization by Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiology 153 (9), 2817–2822. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/009480-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Shiga Kiyoto., Takahashi Kohta., Sato Ikuro., Kato Kengo., Saijo Shigeru., Moriya Setsuko., et al. (2015). Upregulation of Sialidase NEU3 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis. Cancer Sci. 106 (11), 1544–1553. 10.1111/cas.12810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Skropeta Danielle., Schwörer Ralf., Haag Tobias., Schmidt Richard. R. (2004). Asymmetric Synthesis and Affinity of Potent Sialyltransferase Inhibitors Based on Transition-State Analogues. Glycoconjugate J. 21 (5), 205–219. 10.1023/B:GLYC.0000045093.96413.62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Slack Teri. J., Li Wanqing., Shi Dashuang., McArthur John. B., Zhao Gengxiang., Li Yanhong.., et al. (2018). Triazole-Linked Transition State Analogs as Selective Inhibitors against V. Cholerae Sialidase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 26 (21), 5751–5757. 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.10.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Smith Harry., Parsons Nicholas. J., Cole Jeffery. A. (1995). “Mini Review – Sialylation of Neisserial Lipopolysaccharide: A Major Influence on Pathogenicity. Microb. Pathogenesis 19, 365–377. 10.1006/mpat.1995.0071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sugiarto Go., Lau Kam., Yu Hai., Vuong Stephanie., Thon Vireak., Li Yanhong., et al. (2011). Cloning and Characterization of a Viral Α2-3-Sialyltransferase (VST3Gal-I) for the Synthesis of Sialyl Lewisx. Glycobiology 21 (3), 387–396. 10.1093/glycob/cwq172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Swindall Amanda. F., Bellis Susan. L. (2011). Sialylation of the Fas Death Receptor by St6Gal-I Provides Protection against Fas-Mediated Apoptosis in Colon Carcinoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (26), 22982–22990. 10.1074/jbc.M110.211375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Taylor Garry. (1996). Sialidases: Structures, Biological Significance and Therapeutic Potential. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6 (6), 830–837. 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80014-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Theoret James. R., Li Jihong., Navarro Mauricio. A., Garcia Jorge. P., Uzal Francisco. A., McClane Bruce. A. (2018). Native or Proteolytically Activated NanI Sialidase Enhances the Binding and Cytotoxic Activity of Clostridium Perfringens Enterotoxin and Beta Toxin. Infect. Immun. 86 (1), 1–14. 10.1128/IAI.00730-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Thorlund Kristian., Awad Tahany., Guy Boivin., Thabane Lehana. (2011). Systematic Review of Influenza Resistance to the Neuraminidase Inhibitors. Biomed. Cent. Infect. Dis. 11 (134), 1–13. 10.1186/1471-2334-11-134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tsuji Shuichi., Datta A. K., Paulson James. C. (1996). Systematic Nomenclature for Sialyltransferases. Glycobiology 6 (7), 5–7. 10.1093/glycob/6.7.647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Vajaria Bhairavi. N., Patel Kinjal. A., Patel Prabhudas. S. (2018). Role of Aberrant Glycosylation Enzymes in Oral Cancer Progression. J. Carcinogenesis 17 (1), 5. 10.4103/jcar.JCar_7_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Varghese J. N., McKimm-Breschkin J. L., James B., Caldwell A. A. K., Colman P. M. (1992). The Structure of the Complex between Influenza Virus Neuraminidase and Sialic Acid, the Viral Receptor. Proteins 14 (3), 327–332. 10.1128/jvi.00408-2010.1002/prot.340140302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Vavricka Christopher. J., Liu Yue., Kiyota Hiromasa., Sriwilaijaroen Nongluk., Qi Jianxun., Tanaka Kosuke., et al. (2013). Influenza Neuraminidase Operates via a Nucleophilic Mechanism and Can Be Targeted by Covalent Inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 4 (1491), 1–8. 10.1038/ncomms2487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Vavricka Christopher. J., Muto Chiaki., Hasunuma Tomohisa., Kimura Yoshinobu., Araki Michihiro., Wu Yan., et al. (2017). Synthesis of Sulfo-Sialic Acid Analogues: Potent Neuraminidase Inhibitors in Regards to Anomeric Functionality. Scientific Rep. 7 (1), 4–11. 10.1038/s41598-017-07836-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Vogel Ulrich., Hammerschmidt Sven., Frosch Matthias. (1996). Sialic Acids of Both the Capsule and the Sialylated Lipooligosaccharide of Neisseria Meningitis Serogroup B Are Prerequisites for Virulence of Meningococci in the Infant Rat. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 185 (2), 81–87. 10.1007/s004300050018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Volkers Gesa., Worrall Liam. J., Kwan David. H., Yu Ching. Ching., Baumann Lars., Lameignere Emilie., et al. (2015). Structure of Human ST8SiaIII Sialyltransferase Provides Insight into Cell-Surface Polysialylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22 (8), 627–635. 10.1038/nsmb.3060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Walther E., Xu Z., Richter M., Kirchmair J., Grienke U., Rollinger J. M., et al. (2016). Dual Acting Neuraminidase Inhibitors Open New Opportunities to Disrupt the Lethal Synergism between Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Influenza Virus. Front. Microbiol. 7 (MAR), 1–10. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang L., Liu Y., Wu L., Sun X. L. (2016). Sialyltransferase Inhibition and Recent Advances. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Proteins Proteomics 1864 (1), 143–153. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang P. H., Wen L. L., Juang C. M., Yang Y. H., Lo W. H., Lai C. R. (2005). Altered MRNA Expressions of Sialyltransferases in Ovarian Cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 99 (3), 631–639. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wester A., Avinash K. S. (2016). Peramivir Injection in the Treatment of Acute Influenza: a Review of the Literature, Infect Drug Resist 9 (9), 201–214. 10.2147/IDR.S86460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Who (2018). Influenza (Seasonal) Fact Sheet. ” World Health Organisation. [Google Scholar]
  105. World Health Organisation (2020a). Chagas Disease (Also Known as American Trypanosomiasis). ” Chagas Disease Fact Sheets. [Google Scholar]
  106. World Health Organisation (2020b). Human African Trypanosomiasis. Hum. Afr. Trypanosomiasis. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385157-4.00391-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yan Z. Li., Liu A. Y., Xia X., Zhang Z., Qin L., Yu Q., et al. (2019). Divalent Oseltamivir Analogues as Potent Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitors. Carbohydr. Res. 477 (29), 32–38. 10.1016/j.carres.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhang C., Chen J., Liu Y., Xu D. (2019). Sialic Acid Metabolism as a Potential Therapeutic Target of Atherosclerosis. Lipids Health Dis. 18 (1), 1–11. 10.1186/s12944-019-1113-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES