Skip to main content
Photoacoustics logoLink to Photoacoustics
. 2021 Aug 4;23:100290. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100290

A photoacoustic finder fully integrated with a solid-state dye laser and transparent ultrasound transducer

Byullee Park a,1, Moongyu Han a,1, Jeongwoo Park a,1, Taejeong Kim b, Hanyoung Ryu c, Youngseok Seo c, Won Jong Kim b, Hyung Ham Kim a,*, Chulhong Kim a,*
PMCID: PMC8358697  PMID: 34401325

Abstract

The standard-of-care for evaluating lymph node status in breast cancers and melanoma metastasis is sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment performed with a handheld gamma probe and radioisotopes. However, this method inevitably exposes patients and physicians to radiation, and the special facilities required limit its accessibility. Here, we demonstrate a non-ionizing, cost-effective, handheld photoacoustic finder (PAF) fully integrated with a solid-state dye laser and transparent ultrasound transducer (TUT). The solid-state dye laser handpiece is coaxially aligned with the spherically focused TUT. The integrated finder readily detected photoacoustic signals from a tube filled with methylene blue (MB) beneath a 22 mm thick layer of chicken tissue. In live animals, we also photoacoustically detected both SLNs injected with MB and subcutaneously injected melanomas. We believe that our radiation-free and inexpensive PAF can play a vital role in SLN assessment.

Keywords: Photoacoustic sensing, Transparent ultrasound transducer, Solid-state dye laser, Melanoma, Sentinel lymph node

1. Introduction

Because breast cancers and melanomas metastasize primarily through the lymphatic system [[1], [2], [3]], knowing the condition of the lymph nodes is essential in establishing the stage and prognosis of the cancer. It is also a key to effective local control of the disease [2]. A sentinel lymph node (SLN) is defined as the first gateway through which lymphatic drainage from the primary tumor passes. Thus, the SLNs are considered to reflect the status of the entire regional lymph branch. SLN biopsy, the standard-of-care for assessing lymph node conditions, is a safe surgery with low morbidity and low false-negative results [3]. It involves two procedures: localizing the SLN and dissecting it for pathological examination. SLN localization typically requires injecting a radioisotope (Technetium-99m) and a blue dye around the cancerous region [[2], [3], [4]]. The injected agents localize in the lymphatic system fairly quickly (i.e., 30 min), and a handheld gamma probe is then used to sense the SLNs [5,6]. The blue dye helps to identify blue-colored lymph nodes with the naked eye post-incision. This combination of agents provides both high detection performance and a low false-negative rate [4]. However, the use of the radioisotope and gamma probe has three major drawbacks [2,7]: 1) Technetium-99m has a half-life of only 6 h (hr), so it must be injected in the nuclear medicine department, not in the operating room. 2) The radioisotope causes logistical problems, such as isotope handling and disposal. Its use also requires staff training and is subject to regulatory requirements. 3) Patients and physicians are potentially exposed to hazardous radiation.

To avoid these problems, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging of SLNs using non-radioactive indocyanine green (ICG) has been proposed [7]. Several studies have shown that the performance of ICG-based SLN localization is comparable to that of the radioisotope method [8,9]. However, this method suffers from a limited tissue penetration depth (1.0–1.5 cm) [10,11].

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]]has also been explored as a non-ionizing and non-invasive method of identifying SLNs, using blue or green dyes [11,[28], [29], [30], [31]]. Advantageously, PA imaging can delineate SLNs in deep tissue with high resolution and high contrast. However, PA SLN imaging based on blue (methylene blue, MB) or green (indocyanine green, ICG) dyes requires expensive and bulky laser systems such as Q-switched Nd:Yag pumped optical parametric oscillators, Ti: Sapphire lasers, or liquid dye lasers [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]]. Thus, these systems are not yet widespread in clinical settings.

Here, we propose a handheld, non-ionizing, and cost-effective PA finder (PAF) to localize SLNs. The PAF fully integrates a custom transparent ultrasound transducer (TUT) and a solid-state dye laser handpiece. Unlike a conventional opaque UT, the TUT seamlessly enables coaxial optical and acoustic beams in a small form factor [42]. Our TUT is the first to use a single crystal lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate (PMN-PT), different from the TUT previously developed, which uses lithium niobate (LNO) [42] and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [43]. As a piezoelectric material, PMN-PT is especially suitable in the low-frequency range, due to its high electromechanical and dielectric properties compared to LNO and PVDF [44]. In in vitro experiments, we detected PA signals from a tube filled with MB beneath a 22 mm thickness of chicken tissue. In in vivo experiments, after intradermal injection of MB, we sensed PA signals from SLNs in rats. Subsequently, we acquired PA signals from subcutaneously injected melanoma in living mice. In all the in vivo experiments, the PA signals were detected from beneath an 18 mm thickness of chicken tissue.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Fabrication of transparent ultrasound transducer

Fig. 1a shows the eight fabrication steps of the TUT:

  • 1)

    A 6 mm diameter circular disk of 500 μm thick conventional opaque <001 > DC poled PMN-PT single crystal [45,46] (CTS Corp., USA) was prepared. This material was selected for its high electromechanical coupling coefficient (kt ≅ 0.60), high longitudinal velocity (c ≅ 4600 m/s), high piezoelectric constant (d33 ≅ 1500 pC/N), and high transparency (80 % at 650 nm).

  • 2)

    The PMN-PT was transparently lapped to a thickness of 400 μm using a precision lapping and polishing system (PM6, Logitech LTD, UK). Both sides of the opaque PMN-PT were gently polished using fine calcined aluminum oxide powder with powder sizes from 3 μm to 30 μm. No additional DC poling was performed because the entire process of making the PMN-PT transparent was kept below 65 °C, much lower than the 130 °C temperature at which the piezoelectric properties of PMN-PT are thermally depoled [47,48].

  • 3)

    As a transparent electrode, a 200 nm thickness of indium-tin-oxide (ITO) was deposited on the upper surface of the PMN-PT.

  • 4)

    A ring-shaped inner housing (IH), acting as an electrical bridge, was bonded to the ITO layer using conductive epoxy (E-solder 3022, Von Roll, Switzerland). Then, to form a backing layer (BL), degassed Epo-Tek-301epoxy (Epoxy Technology, Inc., USA) was filled inside the IH and cured at room temperature for 24 h. The BL damps unnecessary acoustic signals.

  • 5)

    An outer housing (OH) was placed concentrically on the IH, and the gap between the OH and IH was filled with insulating epoxy (IE, S-209, Devcon Ltd., USA).

  • 6)

    To form an electrical ground, ITO was deposited on the bottom of the PMN-PT and OH.

  • 7)

    To focus the acoustic field, an acoustic lens (AL, #48−267, Edmund Optics, USA) was attached under the ITO layer, using an ultraviolet light-cured adhesive (Norland Optical Adhesive 81, Norland Products, Inc., USA). Further, electrical wires were connected to the IH and OH using the conductive epoxy.

  • 8)

    A parylene-C film with a thickness of 5 μm was deposited on the entire outer surface of the TUT, using a parylene deposition system (PDS 2010, Specialty Coating Systems, Inc., USA).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fabrication of a transparent ultrasound transducer (TUT). PMN-PT, lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate; ITO, indium tin oxide; BL, backing layer; IH, inner housing; IE, insulation epoxy; OH, outer housing; AL, acoustic lens.

2.2. Optical and acoustical properties of the transparent ultrasound transducer

Fig. 2a shows each layer of the TUT, and Fig. 2b, a photograph of the TUT, shows its active diameter of 6 mm above red and white paper to demonstrate its transparency. The optical transparency of the TUT was measured at wavelengths from 400 to 900 nm (Fig. 2c). The TUT shows transparency of 72 % at 650 nm. To evaluate the performance of the TUT, a pulse-echo response was measured by using a pulser–receiver (P/R) (DPR300, JSR Corp., Japan) (Fig. 2d). The measured center frequency was 8.0 MHz, and the -6 dB fractional bandwidth was 45 %. This frequency band of the TUT, 6–10 MHz, is mainly used for pre-clinical and clinical SLN imaging or sensing [31,[49], [50], [51], [52], [53]]. The AL extended the acoustic focal length of the TUT to 19 mm. In addition, the electrical impedance of the TUT was measured using an impedance analyzer (E4990A, Keysight, USA) and kt is calculated to be 0.57 (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Characteristics of a transparent ultrasound transducer (TUT). (a) Layer-by-layer view and (b) a photograph of the TUT. (c) Optical transparency of the TUT. (d) Pulse-echo response and spectrum of the TUT. OH, outer housing; BL, backing layer; IH, inner housing; ITO, indium tin oxide; IE, insulation epoxy; PMN-PT, lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate; AL, acoustic lens; and US, ultrasound.

2.3. Handheld photoacoustic finder

The handheld PAF was developed by integrating the TUT with a commercial portable laser system (COSJET ATR, WONTECH Corp., Republic of Korea). As Fig. 3 shows, the laser system consists of a portable Nd:YAG laser body (288 mm × 583 mm × 847 mm in X—YZ—) and an articulated arm with a solid-state dye handpiece (HOYA ConBio 650 Dye Handpiece, Laser Service Solutions, USA) (Fig. 3a). The laser system generates 532 nm pulsed light with a pulse duration of 5–40 ns and a repetition rate of up to 10 Hz. Then, the laser pulse is transmitted through the articulated arm to the dye handpiece. The TUT holder integrates the handpiece and the TUT coaxially. The PA signals sensed via the TUT are amplified through a P/R and displayed on an oscilloscope. The PAF handpiece measures 38.5 mm × 38.5 mm × 140 mm (X—YZ—), small enough for handheld operation (Fig. 3b). A solid-state dye between two dichroic mirrors changes the light wavelength from 532 nm to 650 nm, a desirable wavelength for sensing MB and melanoma. The light output is delivered to the sample through a confocally placed objective lens with a focal length of 30 mm and the TUT. An ultrasound (US) gel placed between the TUT and the sample provides acoustic coupling.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic of the handheld photoacoustic finder system. (a) The portable solid-state dye laser system with a handheld probe. (b) Detailed schematic of the handheld probe. TUT, transparent ultrasound transducer; DM, dichroic mirror; SSD, solid-state dye; OL, objective lens; and USG, ultrasound gel.

2.4. In vitro and in vivo experiments

All animal experiments were conducted according to the Pohang University of Science and Technology guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. The laser fluence for all in vivo experiments was set to 15 mJ/cm2 which is below the safe exposure limits for skin as standardized by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) (i.e., 20 mJ/cm2) [54]. For the in vivo SLN localization experiments, a vaporized-isoflurane system (delivering 1 L/min of oxygen and 0.75 % isoflurane) was used to initially anesthetize a healthy rat (Sprague Dawley, female, 4 weeks, ∼130 g) and maintain anesthesia during the experiments. To localize the SLN, 0.1 mL of MB with a concentration of 30 mM was used. As a second in vivo demonstration, cutaneous melanoma detection experiments on mice were conducted. For in vivo melanoma tumor model preparation, B16-F1 melanoma cells (Korean Cell Line Bank, 5 × 104 cell/mouse) were subcutaneously injected into the right flank of female BALB/c-nu/nu mice (8 weeks, ∼22 g). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U mL−1 penicillin, and 100 μg mL−1 streptomycin, incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator.

3. Results

3.1. In vitro deep-tissue photoacoustic signal detection

To explore the PA signal sensing capability of the PAF, we conducted in vitro deep tissue PA sensing experiments (Fig. 4). As a target, a 1-mL microtube was filled with MB of 30 mM (Fig. 4a). As seen in Fig. 4b, five slices of chicken tissue, making a total thickness of 22 mm, were successively laid atop the microtube. The 650-nm laser fluence for this in vitro experiment was 14 mJ/cm2, below the ANSI laser safety limit of 20 mJ/cm2 [54]. The PA signal was first measured without chicken tissue, and the signal-to-noise (SNR) was 33 dB (Fig. 4c). The error bar denotes the standard deviation (n = 3). Subsequently, PA signals were measured while incrementally stacking the chicken tissue layers. As the sensing depth increases, the SNR decreases exponentially. The maximum depth at which PA signals could be detected is 22 mm, where the SNR of 12 dB. The effective attenuation coefficient (μeff) of the system, 1.1 cm−1, was calculated from the slope of the fitted line of SNR versus depth, and the calculated effective penetration depth was 0.92 cm. The noise equivalent depth is 34 mm, which is 3.7 times deeper than the 1/e penetration depth of 0.92 cm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

In vitro deep tissue PA signal detection experiment. (a) A sample tube filled with MB. (b) The tube placed under 4 slices of chicken tissue. (c) PA SNR vs depth. PA, photoacoustic; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; and MB, methylene blue. (For interpretation of the references to colour in the Figure, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

3.2. In vivo photoacoustic sentinel lymph node localization

After the hair was removed from the left axillary area of the rat (Fig. 5a), the MB, described above, was intradermally injected into the left forefoot using a 30-gauge syringe. The red dashed circle indicates the PA sensing region where the SLN is presumed to be. We started detecting PA signals in the SLN 10 min after MB injection. The experimental process was recorded as a video (Supplementary Video S1), and Fig. 5b shows a snapshot from the video. A strong time-resolved PA signal with a magnitude 1.1 Vpeak-to-peak is observed at the MB-localized SLN. We initially photoacoustically localized the SLN without overlying chicken tissue and calculated the PA SNR to be 40 dB (Fig. 5c). The error bar denotes the standard deviation (n = 3). To confirm the ability to localize deep tissue SLNs in vivo, three chicken tissue slices were stacked layer by layer above the SLN, and PA signals were detected from beneath each layer. The SNR exponentially decreases as the imaging depth increases. The maximum PA sensing depth is 18 mm, at which the SNR of 18 dB. In ex vivo validation experiments, the MB-containing lymph node and a normal one from the other side were dissected and photoacoustically compared (Fig. 5d). The drainage SLN provided greatly increased PA amplitude. These results support the usefulness of the handheld PAF as a non-invasive, non-ionizing tool for lymph node localization.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

In vivo PA SLN localization experiments using intradermally injected methylene blue in rats (n = 3). (a) Photograph of the rat. (b) Snapshot from the SLN localization experiment video (Supplementary Video S1). (c) PA SNRs estimated at different depths of 0, 4, 11 and 18 mm. (d) Ex vivo PA amplitudes of the dissected SLNs. SLN, sentinel lymph node; PA, photoacoustic; and SNR, signal-to-noise ratio. (For interpretation of the references to colour in the Figure, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

3.3. In vivo photoacoustic cutaneous melanoma detection

To further explore possible applications of PAF, we performed in vivo cutaneous melanoma detection experiments on mice. Because melanoma itself highly absorbs light in the visible and NIR ranges, a strong PA signal can be obtained without dye injection. One week after the melanoma inoculation, the tumor volume had reached 150 mm3, and the mouse was anesthetized using the vaporized-isoflurane system (Fig. 6a). The melanoma detection process was video recorded (Supplementary Video S2), and Fig. 6b is a snapshot from the video. The PAF detected a strong time-resolved PA signal with a magnitude of 1 Vpeak-to-peak from the melanoma. We photoacoustically detected PA signals from the melanoma site indicated by the red circle and confirmed the SNR of 37 dB (Fig. 6c). To demonstrate the capability to sense deep tissue melanoma in vivo, three chicken tissue layers were successively stacked and PA signals were detected from beneath each thickness. The maximum penetration depth is 18 mm with a PA SNR of 15 dB. The error bar denotes a standard deviation (n = 3). After sacrificing the mice, the PA signals were detected from the dissected melanoma-containing tissue and normal tissue of the opposite flank. From the dissected melanoma tissue, we obtained a much stronger PA signal than normal tissue (Fig. 6d). These results show that our system can sense melanoma-specific targets and thus can be further applied to melanoma SLN biopsy.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

In vivo PA detection of subcutaneously injected melanoma in mice (n = 3). (a) Photograph of the mouse, with melanoma circled in red. (b) Snapshot from video recording of the experiments (Supplementary Video S2). (c) PA SNRs estimated from beneath sequentially overlaid tissue depths of 0, 5, and 10 mm. (d) Ex vivo PA amplitude of the dissected melanoma tissue. PA, photoacoustic, and SNR, signal-to-noise ratio. (For interpretation of the references to colour in the Figure, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).

4. Discussion and conclusion

Although ICG-based fluorescence localization of SLN has emerged as an alternative that overcomes problems caused by radioisotopes, but its clinical use is hampered by the insufficient penetration depth of the NIR camera. High-resolution PA sensing, which is similarly non-radioactive and non-invasive, avoids this shortcoming, and PA sensing or imaging studies for SLN biopsy have been successfully conducted on small animals and humans [11,29,51]. However, conventional PA imaging of SLNs requires a multi-channel system that can be expensive and bulky. Moreover, physicians familiar with gamma probes need additional time and effort to adapt to a new clinical imaging protocol.

To our best knowledge, our proposed photoacoustic finder (PAF) system is the first handheld PA sensing tool for SLN localization. Similar in size and use to a gamma probe, it is relatively easy to translate to clinics. Laser safety concerns are minimal because the solid-state dye laser system has been routinely used in dermatology. The system’s key component, the TUT, overcomes the structural limitations of conventional PA imaging or sensing systems. Thanks to the transparency of the transducer, the optical path and TUT are confocally aligned. In addition, the AL effectively focuses the acoustic field of the TUT. These features minimize the system’s size and improve its SNR. Here, we detected PA signals in vitro from an MB-filled tube beneath a 22 mm thickness of chicken tissue. In in vivo experiments, after intradermal injection of MB, we photoacoustically localized SLNs in rats, and we also sensed PA signals from subcutaneously injected melanoma in mice without exogenous agents. In addition, the concentration of MB-localized SLN of a rat injected with 0.1 mL of 30 mM MB is approximately 7 mM [55]. In contrast, the average hemoglobin concentration in the blood vessels is 2.32 mM [56]. As a result of calculating absorption coefficients based on these concentrations, the MB, deoxy-hemoglobin (Hb) and oxy-hemoglobin (HbO2) were 1010 cm−1, 20 cm−1, and 47.1 cm−1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2). To demonstrate that MB-localized SLN can be distinguished from hemoglobin using PAF, we combined PAF with a 2-axis motorized scanner to obtain a two-dimensional SLN PA image from a MB-injected rat. As a result, the MB-localized SLN in the rat was dominantly differentiated through the two-dimensional PA image (Supplementary Figs. S3). Further, the PA amplitude in the plastic tube containing MB was 9-folds stronger than that in the plastic tube containing fresh rat blood (Supplementary Figs. S4). We also sensed PA signals from subcutaneously injected melanoma in mice without exogenous agents. In all in vivo experiments, the PA signals were detected after stacking 18-mm thick chicken tissue. Potentially, our handheld PAF can evaluate cancer metastasis by performing SLN assessment without a gamma probe, solving various problems caused by the use of radioactive isotopes. Furthermore, we expect that SLN assessments of cancers such as melanoma that have their own pigment can be performed without dye injection.

In human beings, SLNs are mainly located 1.2 ± 0.5 cm from skin [55]. According to the previous literatures, the 1/e optical penetration depths in human breast tissue and chicken breast tissue are 0.78 cm [55]and 1.1 cm [50], respectively. This is comparable to the calculated 1/e penetration depth of 0.92 cm based on our experimental results. In previous studies with similar 1/e penetration depths to ours [51,55], PA SLN images were obtained from human breast tissue and chicken breast tissue from sufficient depth. Although we showed the feasibility of the handheld PAF for SLN localization at a depth of 18 mm, this sensing depth is not sufficient for human studies, since PA signals in human tissues are more attenuated than in chicken breast tissues (0.78 cm vs. 1.1 cm) due to the optical absorption factors such as blood and lipids. Therefore, assessing the sensing depth using a living tissue will yield more accurate results. To compensate this, following approaches can be pursued in the future: 1) Develop a lower frequency of the TUT (4–5 MHz). The attenuation coefficient is inversely proportional to frequency and distance. The attenuation of soft tissue and fat is 0.75 dB/cm/MHz [57]. Replacing the 8 MHz TUT with a 4 MHz TUT prevents a 5.4 dB of acoustic attenuation loss in soft tissue 18 mm deep. 2) Double the aperture size of the TUT. The sensitivity of a piezoelectric detector is proportional to its element size [58]. Increasing the current TUT aperture diameter from 9 mm to 18 mm could give a 4-folds improvement in sensitivity. 3) Average the PA signal. Averaging is one of the simplest ways to efficiently reduce random noise while maintaining the PA response [59]. Although averaging was not applied in our study due to the slow PRF of the laser source (up to 10 Hz), averaging can be performed using a relatively high-speed laser to effectively increase the SNR in the subsequent study. 4) Use a proper matching layer to improve the acoustic energy transfer efficiency. The acoustic energy transfer efficiency can be improved by replacing the acoustic lens with an acoustic impedance of 11–13 MRayl we used with a material with an acoustic impedance of 7–8 MRayl [44]. 5) Raise the laser fluence to near the ANSI limit (20 mJ/cm2) to maximize the light penetration depth in the tissue. In the future, such system improvements are expected to enable SLN localization and melanoma detection in biological tissues 3−5 cm deep in vivo.

Declaration of Competing Interest

Chulhong Kim has financial interests in OPTICHO, which, however, did not support this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the following sources: The National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (No. NRF-2019R1A2C2006269), the Basic Science Research Program of the NRF of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education (No. NRF-2020R1A6A1A03047902), the National R&D Program of the NRF of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (No. 2020M3H2A1078045), POSCO Project, and BK21 FOUR Projects.

Biographies

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Dr. Byullee Park received his Ph.D. degree in Creative IT Engineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in Republic of Korea from 2015 to 2020. He is currently undertaking a post-doctoral researcher training course at POSTECH (2021∼). His research interests are the development of novel biomedical imaging techniques including sub-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy and clinical photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging.

graphic file with name fx2.jpg

Moongyu Han is an MS-PhD candidate in the Creative IT Engineering Department at POSTECH (2020∼). He completed his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Ajou University in 2017. His research interests include super resolution microscopy and the application of photoacoustic imaging.

graphic file with name fx3.jpg

Mr. Jeongwoo Park is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Interdisciplinary Bioscience and Bioengineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in Republic of Korea (2017∼). He completed his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering at Kyungpook National University at 2016. His research interests are the development of a transparent ultrasound transducer that applied to photoacoustic and multi-modal imaging, ranging from preclinical to clinical use.

graphic file with name fx4.jpg

Mr. Taejeong Kim received his bachelor’s degree from the Department of Bionano Engineering, Hanyang University. He joined Prof. Won Jong Kim’s group at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) from 2017. His research is focusing on the nitric oxide-delivery and nitric oxide-scavenging using polymer-based hybrid materials.

graphic file with name fx5.jpg

Han Young Ryu received the Ph. D. degree in physics from the Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea, in 2006. Since 2006, he was worked as a Senior Researcher in the Division of Physical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Korea. Since 2011, he is working as a Principle Research Engineer in the WonTech Company. His current research interests include fiber laser, mode-locked fiber laser, nonlinear fiber optics, optical fiber comb generator. Dr. Ryu is a Member of the Optical Society of Korea, Korean Physical Society.

graphic file with name fx6.jpg

Young-Seok Seo is currently the Director of R&D center of WON TECH Co., Ltd. Daejeon, Korea, working on medical laser devices research and development. He obtained a joint Ph.D. degree in physics from Chungnam National University and Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), in February 2003. From March 1999 to September 2003, he had been with Quantum Optics Laboratories of the KAERI, working on high-power laser delivery system by adaptive optics (AO) technologies such as wavefront sensing, aberration compensation, and closed-loop control of AO systems. In October 2003, he joined Laser Power Photonics Group of the Institute of Laser Engineering (ILE) at Osaka University, Osaka, Japan where he has been engaged in optical fiber communication research. Among his research interests are fiber amplifiers, fiber lasers, and new laser materials. In October 2006, he returned to KAERI and established High energy laser facility of KAERI.

graphic file with name fx7.jpg

Prof. Won Jong Kim obtained his Ph.D. in biomolecular engineering in 2004 at the Tokyo Institute of Technology under the supervision of Prof. T. Akaike and Prof. A. Maruyama. From 2004–2007, he was a postdoctoral fellow in Prof. Sung Wan Kim's group at the University of Utah. Now, he is a Mueunjae chaired professor at the Department of Chemistry, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH). His research field covers smart nanomedicine, delivery of biomolecules such as gene/drug/nitric oxide, and DNA engineering.

graphic file with name fx8.jpg

Dr. Hyung Ham Kim received his Ph.D. degree in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA in 2010. He worked as a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Southern California and Manager of the NIH Resource Center for Medical Ultrasonic Transducer Technology until he joined Analogic Inc., Peabody, MA in 2014. At Analogic, he led the research solutions business as a Director of Business Development by 2016. He is currently an Associate Professor of Department of Convergence IT Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering and School of Interdisciplinary Bioscience and Bioengineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Korea. His current research includes high frequency array transducers for high resolution ultrasound imaging, cellular mechanics studies using high frequency ultrasound and neuromodulation using focused ultrasound.

graphic file with name fx9.jpg

Dr. Chulhong Kim earned his Ph.D. degree and did postdoctoral training at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. He currently holds the Mueunjae Chaired Professorship and is an Associate Professor of Creative IT Engineering at Pohang University of Science and Technology in the Republic of Korea. He has received a 2017 IEEE EMBS Early Career Achievement Award, the 2017 Korean Academy of Science and Technology Young Scientist Award, the 2016 Nightingale Award from IFMBE, and the 2017 KOSOMBE Young Investigator Award for “Contributions to multi-scale photoacoustic imaging, ranging from super-resolution atomic force photoactivated microscopy for research to systems for clinical applications.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100290.

Contributor Information

Byullee Park, Email: blpark@postech.ac.kr.

Moongyu Han, Email: dalgyu0820@postech.ac.kr.

Jeongwoo Park, Email: jpark215@postech.ac.kr.

Taejeong Kim, Email: tjkim@postech.ac.kr.

Hanyoung Ryu, Email: hyryu@wtlaser.com.

Youngseok Seo, Email: physys@wtlaser.com.

Won Jong Kim, Email: wjkim@postech.ac.kr.

Hyung Ham Kim, Email: david.kim@postech.ac.kr.

Chulhong Kim, Email: chulhong@postech.edu.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are Supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.docx (3.3MB, docx)
Download video file (87.1MB, mp4)
Download video file (109.5MB, mp4)

References

  • 1.Wiechmann L., Sampson M., Stempel M., Jacks L.M., Patil S.M., King T., Morrow M. Presenting features of breast cancer differ by molecular subtype. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009;16(10):2705–2710. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahmed M., Purushotham A.D., Douek M. Novel techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):e351–e362. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70590-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dogan N.U., Dogan S., Favero G., Köhler C., Dursun P. The basics of sentinel lymph node biopsy: anatomical and pathophysiological considerations and clinical aspects. J. Oncol. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/3415630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ferrari A., Rovera F., Dionigi P., Limonta G., Marelli M., Besana Ciani I., Bianchi V., Vanoli C., Dionigi R. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as the new standard of care in the surgical treatment for breast cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2006;6(10):1503–1515. doi: 10.1586/14737140.6.10.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yudd A.P., Kempf J.S., Goydos J.S., Stahl T.J., Feinstein R.S. Use of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in malignant melanoma, Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America. Inc. 1999;19(2):343–353. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr12343. discussion 354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sugi K., Kaneda Y., Hirasawa K., Kunitani N. Radioisotope marking under CT guidance and localization using a handheld gamma probe for small or indistinct pulmonary lesions. Chest. 2003;124(1):155–158. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sugie T., Ikeda T., Kawaguchi A., Shimizu A., Toi M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence in early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;22(1):11–17. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-1064-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jung S.-Y., Kim S.-K., Kim S.W., Kwon Y., Lee E.S., Kang H.-S., Ko K.L., Shin K.H., Lee K.S., Park I.H. Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by the multimodal method of indocyanine green fluorescence, radioisotope, and blue dye versus the radioisotope method in breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014;21(4):1254–1259. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3437-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balch C.M., Ross M.I. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in melanoma. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(7):623–624. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stoffels I., Leyh J., Pöppel T., Schadendorf D., Klode J. Evaluation of a radioactive and fluorescent hybrid tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck malignancies: prospective randomized clinical trial to compare ICG-99m Tc-nanocolloid hybrid tracer versus 99m Tc-nanocolloid. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015;42(11):1631–1638. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3093-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stoffels I., Jansen P., Petri M., Goerdt L., Brinker T.J., Griewank K.G., Poeppel T.D., Schadendorf D., Klode J. Assessment of nonradioactive multispectral optoacoustic tomographic imaging with conventional lymphoscintigraphic imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma. JAMA network open. 2019;2(8) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9020. e199020-e199020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cho S., Baik J., Managuli R., Kim C. 3D PHOVIS: 3D photoacoustic visualization studio. Photoacoustics. 2020;18 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeon S., Song H.B., Kim J., Lee B.J., Managuli R., Kim J.H., Kim J.H., Kim C. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of anterior ocular vasculature: a random sample consensus approach. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04334-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu C., Liao J., Chen L., Chen J., Ding R., Gong X., Cui C., Pang Z., Zheng W., Song L. The integrated high-resolution reflection-mode photoacoustic and fluorescence confocal microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2019;14:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cho S., Jeon S., Choi W., Managuli R., Kim C. Nonlinear pth root spectral magnitude scaling beamforming for clinical photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(16):4575–4578. doi: 10.1364/OL.393315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jeon S., Park J., Managuli R., Kim C. A novel 2-D synthetic aperture focusing technique for acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2018;38(1):250–260. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2861400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim H., Baik J.W., Jeon S., Kim J.Y., Kim C. PAExM: label-free hyper-resolution photoacoustic expansion microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2020;45(24):6755–6758. doi: 10.1364/OL.404041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou J., Jokerst J.V. Photoacoustic imaging with fiber optic technology: a review. Photoacoustics. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jeon S., Park E.-Y., Choi W., Managuli R., jong Lee K., Kim C. Real-time delay-multiply-and-sum beamforming with coherence factor for in vivo clinical photoacoustic imaging of humans. Photoacoustics. 2019;15 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee C., Kim J.Y., Kim C. Recent progress on photoacoustic imaging enhanced with microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies. Micromachines. 2018;9(11):584. doi: 10.3390/mi9110584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Park B., Lee H., Jeon S., Ahn J., Kim H.H., Kim C. Reflection‐mode switchable subwavelength Bessel‐beam and Gaussian‐beam photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J. Biophotonics. 2019;12(2) doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park E.-Y., Park S., Lee H., Kang M., Kim C., Kim J. Simultaneous dual-modal multispectral photoacoustic and ultrasound macroscopy for three-dimensional whole-body imaging of small animals. Photonics. 2021;8(1):13. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou Y., Chen J., Liu C., Liu C., Lai P., Wang L. Single-shot linear dichroism optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2019;16 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim J., Kim J.Y., Jeon S., Baik J.W., Cho S.H., Kim C. Super-resolution localization photoacoustic microscopy using intrinsic red blood cells as contrast absorbers. Light Sci. Appl. 2019;8(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0220-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hosseinaee Z., Le M., Bell K. Towards non-contact photoacoustic imaging. Photoacoustics. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Na S., Yuan X., Lin L., Isla J., Garrett D., Wang L.V. Transcranial photoacoustic computed tomography based on a layered back-projection method. Photoacoustics. 2020;20 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim J., Park B., Ha J., Steinberg I., Hooper S.M., Jeong C., Park E.-Y., Choi W., Liang T., Bae J.-S. Multiparametric photoacoustic analysis of human thyroid cancers in vivo. Cancer Res. 2021 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3334. %@ 0008-5472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim C., Song K.H., Gao F., Wang L.V. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels: noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats—volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging. Radiology. 2010;255(2):442–450. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stoffels I., Morscher S., Helfrich I., Hillen U., Leyh J., Burton N.C., Sardella T.C., Claussen J., Poeppel T.D., Bachmann H.S. Metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma determined noninvasively with multispectral optoacoustic imaging. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7(317) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad1278. 317ra199-317ra199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Han M., Choi W., Ahn J., Ryu H., Seo Y., Kim C. In vivo dual-modal photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging of sentinel lymph nodes using a solid-state dye laser system. Sensors. 2020;20(13):3714. doi: 10.3390/s20133714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Park B., Lee K.M., Park S., Yun M., Choi H.-J., Kim J., Lee C., Kim H., Kim C. Deep tissue photoacoustic imaging of nickel (II) dithiolene-containing polymeric nanoparticles in the second near-infrared window. Theranostics. 2020;10(6):2509. doi: 10.7150/thno.39403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Park B., Bang C.H., Lee C., Han J.H., Choi W., Kim J., Park G.S., Rhie J.W., Lee J.H., Kim C. 3D wide‐field multispectral photoacoustic imaging of human melanomas in vivo: a pilot study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021;35(3):669–676. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cui M., Zuo H., Wang X., Deng K., Luo J., Ma C. Adaptive photoacoustic computed tomography. Photoacoustics. 2021;21 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manohar S., Gambhir S. Clinical photoacoustic imaging. Photoacoustics. 2020;19 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee W.J., Park E.-Y., Choi D., Lee D., Koo J., Min J.G., Jung Y., Hong S.B., Kim K., Kim C. Colloidal porous AuAg alloyed nanoparticles for enhanced photoacoustic imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(29):32270–32277. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c05650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wu Y., Sun L., Zeng F., Wu S. A conjugated-polymer-based ratiometric nanoprobe for evaluating in-vivo hepatotoxicity induced by herbal medicine via MSOT imaging. Photoacoustics. 2019;13:6–17. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jung H., Park S., Gunassekaran G.R., Jeon M., Cho Y.-E., Baek M.-C., Park J.Y., Shim G., Oh Y.-K., Kim I.-S. A peptide probe enables photoacoustic-guided imaging and drug delivery to lung tumors in K-rasLA2 mutant mice. Cancer Res. 2019;79(16):4271–4282. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Choi W., Oh D., Kim C. Practical photoacoustic tomography: realistic limitations and technical solutions. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;127(23) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen Q., Qin W., Qi W., Xi L. Progress of clinical translation of handheld and semi-handheld photoacoustic imaging. Photoacoustics. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Steinberg I., Kim J., Schneider M.K., Hyun D., Zlitni A., Hooper S.M., Klap T., Sonn G.A., Dahl J.J., Kim C. Superiorized photo-acoustic Non-NEgative reconstruction (SPANNER) for clinical photoacoustic imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2021 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3068181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee C., Choi W., Kim J., Kim C. Three-dimensional clinical handheld photoacoustic/ultrasound scanner. Photoacoustics. 2020;18 doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Park J., Park B., Kim T.Y., Jung S., Choi W.J., Ahn J., Yoon D.H., Kim J., Jeon S., Lee D., Yong U., Jang J., Kim W.J., Kim H.K., Jeong U., Kim H.H., Kim C. Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920879118. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fang C., Hu H., Zou J. A focused optically transparent PVDF transducer for photoacoustic microscopy. IEEE Sens. J. 2019;20(5):2313–2319. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou Q., Lam K.H., Zheng H., Qiu W., Shung K.K. Piezoelectric single crystal ultrasonic transducers for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014;66:87–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Park J.-S., Kim J.-H. Coefficients of thermal expansion for single crystal piezoelectric fiber composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2007;38(7–8):795–799. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wan H., Kim H., Wu H., Luo C., Jiang X. Characterization of High-frequency ultrasound transducers made of alternating current poled Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3−xPbTiO3Single crystals. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2020:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sun P., Zhou Q., Zhu B., Wu D., Hu C., Cannata J.M., Tian J., Han P., Wang G., Shung K.K. Design and fabrication of PIN-PMN-PT single-crystal high-frequency ultrasound transducers, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics. and frequency control. 2009;56(12):2760–2763. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Luo L., Dietze M., Solterbeck C.-H., Luo H., Es-Souni M. Tuning the functional properties of PMN-PT single crystals via doping and thermoelectrical treatments. J. Appl. Phys. 2013;114(22) [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Park S., Park G., Kim J., Choi W., Jeong U., Kim C. Bi2Se3 nanoplates for contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging at 1064 nm. Nanoscale. 2018;10(44):20548–20558. doi: 10.1039/c8nr05672b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim C., Erpelding T.N., Jankovic L., Pashley M.D., Wang L.V. Deeply penetrating in vivo photoacoustic imaging using a clinical ultrasound array system. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2010;1(1):278–284. doi: 10.1364/BOE.1.000278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Garcia-Uribe A., Erpelding T.N., Krumholz A., Ke H., Maslov K., Appleton C., Margenthaler J.A., Wang L.V. Dual-modality photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for noninvasive sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep15748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sannachi L., Gangeh M., Naini A.-S., Bhargava P., Jain A., Tran W.T., Czarnota G.J. Quantitative ultrasound monitoring of breast tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of results among clinical scanners. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020;46(5) doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.01.022. 1142-1157 %@ 0301-5629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kelly K.M., Dean J., Comulada W.S., Lee S.-J. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur. Radiol. 2010;20(3):734–742. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Standard A. American National Standards Institute, Inc.; New York: 1993. Z136. 1. American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim C., Erpelding T.N., Jankovic L., Wang L.V. Performance benchmarks of an array-based hand-held photoacoustic probe adapted from a clinical ultrasound system for non-invasive sentinel lymph node imaging, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: mathematical. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011;369(1955):4644–4650. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Prahl S. Optical Absorption of Methylene Blue. https://omlc.org/index.html
  • 57.Shankar H., Pagel P.S., Warner D.S. Potential adverse ultrasound-related biological effects: a critical review. J. Am. Soc. Anesthesiologists. 2011;115(5):1109–1124. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822fd1f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yao J., Wang L.V. Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(2):87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Smith S.W. 1997. The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (3.3MB, docx)
Download video file (87.1MB, mp4)
Download video file (109.5MB, mp4)

Articles from Photoacoustics are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES