Topical corticosteroids normalize both skin and systemic inflammatory markers in infant atopic dermatitis

Summary

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease. It is highly heterogeneous in clinical presentation, treatment response, disease trajectory and associated atopic comorbidities. Immune biomarkers are dysregulated in skin and peripheral blood.

Aims

We used noninvasive skin and peripheral biomarkers to observe the effects of real‐world topical corticosteroid (TCS) treatment in infants with AD, by measuring skin and blood biomarkers before and after therapy.

Methods

Seventy‐four treatment‐naïve infants with AD underwent 6 weeks of TCS treatment. Stratum corneum (SC) and plasma blood biomarkers as well as SC natural moisturizing factor (NMF) were measured before and after TCS therapy. Immune markers included innate, T helper (Th)1 and Th2 immunity, angiogenesis, and vascular factors. AD severity was assessed by the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis index, and skin barrier function by transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Twenty healthy infants were recruited as controls.

Results

TCS therapy predictably led to improvement in disease severity. Levels of immune markers in the skin and in the peripheral blood showed significant change from baseline, though most did not reach healthy control levels. The most prominent change from baseline in the SC was in markers of innate immune activation, interleukin (IL)‐18, IL‐8 and IL‐1α, and the Th2 chemokines C‐C motif chemokine (CCL)17 and CCL22. In blood, the largest changes were in Th2‐skewed biomarkers: CCL17, IL‐13, CCL22, IL‐5, and CCL26. TEWL decreased after therapy; no significant changes from baseline were found for NMF.

Conclusions

The profound impact of topical therapy on systemic biomarkers suggests that the skin compartment generates a major component of dysregulated systemic cytokines in infant AD. There may be long‐term beneficial effects of correcting systemic immune dysregulation through topical therapy.

Short abstract

What is already known about this topic?

• Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a clinically heterogeneous condition with multiple clinical manifestations and a complex pathogenesis.

• Noninvasive sampling of the stratum corneum has yielded significant insights into cytokine profiles of this compartment in AD.

• Peripheral blood signatures have distinct cytokine profiles in childhood AD.

What does this study add?

• We show the effects of topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy on both skin‐derived and peripheral blood biomarkers.

• TCS therapy had an effect on the cutaneous compartment but also substantially normalized the peripheral blood compartment cytokine signatures.

• The long‐term effects of normalizing peripheral immune signatures are unknown but could potentially be beneficial.

What is the translational message?

• TCS therapy can normalize systemic immune dysregulation in infant AD.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease and is associated with a significant burden of disease and cost of treatment.¹ AD is associated with multiple atopic comorbidities including food allergy, asthma, allergic rhinitis and eosinophilic oesophagitis in addition to emerging evidence of additional comorbidities, including neuropsychiatric and metabolic morbidity.², ³, ⁴ As AD begins in infancy, a better understanding of early‐life mechanisms and responses to first‐line treatments is important.

To date, very few studies have examined skin and peripheral biomarkers in infants with AD. Recently, several studies have demonstrated, using tape stripping and a variety of analytical methodologies, how noninvasive biomarkers derived from the stratum corneum (SC) can give significant insights into immune dysregulation at the skin surface and that these biomarkers have a different profile from those of the peripheral blood component.⁵, ⁶, ⁷, ⁸, ⁹, ¹⁰

While our previous work used multiplex immunoassays of tape‐strip eluates for cytokine analysis,¹⁰, ¹¹ and high‐performance liquid chromatography analyses for filaggrin breakdown products [natural moisturizing factor (NMF)],¹⁰, ¹¹ others have used approaches such as transcriptomic and proteomic analysis in a variety of patient cohorts including adults and children.⁷, ⁸, ⁹, ¹², ¹³

Collectively, these studies serve to show the utility of these noninvasive techniques and together, in a complementary fashion, they have helped to establish a better understanding of local immune signatures in the outer epidermis. Here, we aimed to study the effects of 6 weeks of real‐life topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy on treatment‐naïve infants with respect to skin barrier function, and SC‐ and peripheral blood‐derived biomarkers.

Patients and methods

Study population

One hundred infants with AD were recruited, from November 2012 to November 2014, in a dedicated AD clinic in Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin. A single, experienced paediatric dermatologist (M.A.McA.) assessed, recruited and treated all infant patients. Patients had to be less than 12 months of age with moderate or severe AD, as determined by a SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score of 25 or greater, for at least 6 weeks’ duration. Furthermore, patients had to be treatment naïve, apart from the use of emollients and 1% hydrocortisone cream or ointment. Twenty control infants were recruited when attending Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, for elective procedures under general anaesthetic. Controls were recruited if they did not have AD, any history suggestive of AD or atopy, or any other inflammatory skin disease; and they were age‐ and ethnically matched. All infants and children were examined to ensure an absence of inflammatory skin disease. All parents and carers were asked to refrain from application of any topical agents for 24 h prior to assessment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Children’s Heath Ireland, Dublin. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients’ parents.

Clinical assessment

Patients met the Hanifin and Rajka criteria for diagnosis of AD.¹⁴ Age of onset of AD was recorded. Severity was assessed using the SCORAD index.¹⁵ All patients had moderate or severe AD defined by a SCORAD of 25 or greater. Objective SCORAD (oSCORAD), the component of SCORAD without the subjective scores of parental assessment of sleep loss and itch, was also recorded. A summary of clinical and demographic characteristics of our recruited patients is tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data

	Patients with atopic dermatitis		Controls
Total	74		20
Sex
Male	56		14
Female	18		6
Age (months), median (range)	7·4 (0·8‒11·8)		7·0 (0‒12·3)
Age at onset (months), median (range)	1·8 (0·5‒10·1)		‒
	T0	T6
SCORAD, median (range)	45·0 (23·4‒91·3)	16·4 (0‒79·6)	‒
TEWL (g m‒2 h‒1), median (range)	21·5 (8·5‒53·9)	14·8 (7·4‒48·0)	11·8 (4·0‒15·6)
FLG status
Wild‐type	37		18
Heterozygous	27		2
Homozygous	5		0
Unknown	5		0

SCORAD, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis; TEWL, transepidermal water loss; FLG, filaggrin gene.

Therapy

As this was an observational study, patients were treated with TCS in line with normal clinical practice, and treatment course was tailored to the child’s disease severity according to department practice. A summary of steroid potencies and used volume is listed in Table S1 (see Supporting Information).

Stratum corneum transepidermal water loss measurement

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements were done under standardized conditions (room temperature of 22–25 °C and humidity levels of 30–35%). Patients were acclimatized for a minimum of 10 min, with their volar forearm skin exposed. Measurements were taken from an area of clinically unaffected skin on the volar forearm using the Tewameter® TM 300 (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany).

Sampling of the stratum corneum by tape stripping

The SC was sampled using the previously described method,¹⁰ using circular adhesive tape strips (3·8 cm², D’Squame, Monaderm, Monaco) and a D‐Squame D500 pressure instrument (CuDerm, Dallas, TX, USA). Eight consecutive tape strips were sampled, all from the same site, in nonlesional skin, 2 cm away from visible eczematous areas, and immediately stored at –80 °C.

Blood sampling

Plasma was separated by centrifugation, pipetted into cryotubes, and stored frozen at –80 °C until analysis.

Determination of filaggrin breakdown products (natural moisturizing factor) in the stratum corneum

Analysis of NMF breakdown components (histidine, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, trans‐urocanic acid and cis‐urocanic acid) was performed on the fourth consecutive strip according to the method previously described.¹⁰, ¹⁶

Filaggrin genotyping

All patients were screened for the nine most common filaggrin gene (FLG) mutations found in the Irish population (R501X, Y2092X, 2282del4, R2447X, S3247X, R3419X, 3702X, S1040X and G1139X), as previously described.¹⁰

Cytokine analysis in tape strips and plasma samples

Cytokine concentrations in the SC and plasma were measured using MESO QuickPlex SQ 120 (Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC, Rockville, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, apart from the samples being undiluted, and in the case of SC samples incubation time was prolonged to 16 h. Cytokines were measured on preconfigured multiplex panels as follows: proinflammatory panel: interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐2 and IL‐13 in the SC, with additionally interferon gamma, IL‐4, IL‐6, IL‐10, IL12p70 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α in plasma; chemokine panel: C‐C motif chemokine (CCL)2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL13, CCL17, CCL22, IL‐8 and C‐X‐C motif chemokine 10 in the SC, with additionally CCL5 and CCL11 in plasma; cytokine panel: granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor, IL‐1α, IL‐5, IL‐7, IL‐12p40, IL‐15, IL‐16 and IL‐17A in the SC, with additionally TNF‐β, IL‐17A and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in plasma; vascular panel: C‐reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM‐1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM‐1) in both SC and plasma; and angiogenesis panel: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VGFR1, or Flt‐1), angiopoietin‐1 receptor, VEGF‐A and VEGF‐C in the SC, with additionally basic fibroblast growth factor, placental growth factor and VEGF‐D in plasma. Some singleplex assays were also carried out (IL‐18).

For statistical analysis, cytokine concentrations below the detection limit (but above the bottom of the bottom of the curve fit) were taken unchanged. Samples with cytokine concentrations that were below the fit curve range (the signal was below the bottom of the bottom of the curve fit, no concentration given) were assigned half the value of the lowest sample concentration below the detection limit to maintain the ranking order. The limits of detection and number of samples with concentrations below the fit curve range are given in Table S2 (see Supporting Information) for each cytokine measured in SC and plasma.

Extraction of immune biomarkers from the stratum corneum

The fifth consecutive tape strip was used to measure biomarker levels in the SC. To determine the amount of soluble protein and biomarkers, 0·6 mL of phosphate‐buffered saline (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with 0·005% Tween‐20 (Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to each vial, and the vials were left on ice for 30 min. Extraction was performed with an ultrasound sonifier equipped with a probe (Salm en Kipp, Breukelen, the Netherlands) for 15 min in ice water. The extract was centrifuged (2 min at 15 000 g), and supernatant aliquots of 60 µL were frozen at –80 °C until further analysis. As the amount of SC on the tape strips varies, the concentration of biomarkers in the SC was normalized for protein content, which was determined using the Pierce Micro BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with bovine serum albumin supplied as standard.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The data on immune biomarkers were log transformed before statistical testing. Differences in biomarker levels between baseline values and after 6 weeks of therapy were determined by the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Differences in biomarker levels between healthy controls and post‐therapy values in infants with AD were tested by a two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U‐test. P‐values were corrected for multiple testing using a Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

Results

Study patients

We initially recruited 100 infants with moderate or severe AD and 20 healthy control infants.¹⁰ From this cohort, 74 patients returned for examination after 6 weeks of topical therapy. Immune biomarkers were analysed in the plasma of 47 patient samples and 20 control samples. SC samples were analysed for NMF in 74 patient samples and 18 controls, and for immune biomarkers in 66 patient samples and 13 controls. All raw study data are listed in Table S3 (see Supporting Information).

Disease severity and barrier function

Most children showed significant improvement in disease severity as assessed either by SCORAD or oSCORAD (Figure 1a, b). Only two children showed an increase in SCORAD and three an increase in oSCORAD. Recovery of the skin barrier was observed, albeit to a lesser extent than the improvement measured by SCORAD: median TEWL values decreased from 21·5 g m^–2 h^–1 at baseline to 14·8 g m^–2 h^–1 after therapy (Figure 1c). Of 71 children with TEWL value measured, 18 showed reduction in skin barrier function from baseline. Median TEWL values in infants with AD were significantly higher than the median in healthy infants (11·0 g m^–2 h^–1). After 6 weeks of therapy, the majority of children (59 of 73) still had higher TEWL values as compared with healthy controls. To explore whether carriers of FLG mutations have a different therapy response, changes in disease severity and TEWL were tested in subgroups with respect to FLG mutations. As shown in Table S4 (see Supporting Information), both subgroups showed similar changes from baseline in SCORAD/oSCORAD and TEWL.

Figure 1.

(a, b) Severity of disease as assessed by (a) SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and (b) objective SCORAD (oSCORAD), in infants with AD at baseline (AD_T0) and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy (AD_T6). (c, d) Skin barrier function as assessed by (c) transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and (d) stratum corneum (SC) natural moisturizing factor (NMF) levels in patients at AD_T0 and at AD_T6, compared with healthy controls (Ctrl). Differences in disease severity, TEWL and NMF levels at AD_T0 and AD_T6 were determined by two‐tailed Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Benjamini–Hochberg corrected P‐values: ****P < 0·0001, ***P < 0·001.

Natural moisturizing factor

NMF values at baseline and after therapy are shown in Figure 1d. In contrast with disease severity and barrier function, no improvement in NMF was achieved after therapy, irrespective of the presence of FLG mutations (Table S4 and Figure S1; see Supporting Information).

Stratum corneum biomarkers

Of 27 measured biomarkers in the SC, 22 showed significantly different levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy (Table S3). Median levels of immune markers in patients at baseline and after therapy that showed significant difference from baseline either in the SC or plasma, along with levels in healthy participants, are shown in Figure 2. Although the majority of cytokines showed changes toward values found in healthy participants, their levels still did not reach those of healthy participants (Table S3). Differences between baseline and post‐therapy levels were further elaborated for biomarkers that showed significant change from baseline, and expressed as fold difference (Figure 3). The most prominent change in the SC was found for markers of innate immune activation (IL‐18 and IL‐8), and angiogenesis and vascular markers (Flt‐1 and VEGF‐A) (decrease from baseline).

Figure 2.

Levels of immune biomarkers in the stratum corneum (SC) and plasma of infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) at baseline (AD_T0) and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy (AD_T6) vs. healthy controls (Ctrl). SC: n (AD) = 66 and n (Ctrl) = 13; plasma: n (AD) = 47 and n (Ctrl) = 20. Values are log transformed and shown as box‐and‐whisker plots. Differences in biomarker levels between AD_T0 and AD_T6 were determined by two‐tailed paired t‐test or Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Differences in biomarker levels between healthy controls and infants with AD at AD_T6 were determined by two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U‐test (raw data in Table S3; see Supporting Information). CRP, C‐reactive protein; CCL, C‐C motif chemokine; Flt‐1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1; GM‐CSF, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. Benjamini–Hochberg corrected P‐values: ****P < 0·0001, ***P < 0·001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Figure 3.

Fold differences between levels of immune biomarkers in the stratum corneum (SC) and plasma of infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) at baseline and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy. Data are presented only for biomarkers showing significant change from baseline. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. SC: n (AD) = 66 and n (Ctrl) = 13; plasma: n (AD) = 47 and n (Ctrl) = 20. Fold difference was calculated by dividing the individual post‐therapy biomarker level in the SC and plasma of each patient by the corresponding baseline value. CRP, C‐reactive protein; CCL, C‐C motif chemokine; Flt‐1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1; GM‐CSF, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule; Th2, T helper type 2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. ****P < 0·0001, ***P < 0·001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Systemic biomarkers

Of 40 measured biomarkers in plasma, 10 showed significantly different levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy (Table S3). Median levels of immune markers in patients at baseline and after therapy that showed significant difference from baseline either in SC or plasma, along with levels in healthy participants, are shown in Figure 2. In plasma, the largest changes were found for T‐helper (Th)2‐skewed biomarkers (CCL17, IL‐13, CCL22, IL‐5 and CCL26), and vascular cell adhesion markers sICAM‐1 and sVCAM‐1, which all decreased after therapy.

While some biomarkers showed a directional change (i.e. a parallel increase or decrease after therapy) between the SC and plasma, some showed discordance between the two, or were significantly different from baseline only in the SC or plasma (Figures 2 and 3). For example, CCL17, CCL22, slCAM1, sVCAM‐1, and Flt‐1 changed in the same direction (a decrease) after therapy in both SC and plasma. However, several inflammatory biomarkers after therapy were significantly different from baseline only in the SC; these included cytokines IL‐18, IL‐1α, IL‐2, IL‐15, IL‐16, IL‐12p40, chemokines IL‐8, CCL2, CCL3 and CCL4, along with vascular and angiogenesis factors VEGF‐A, CRP and SAA. In contrast, IL‐13 decreased only in plasma (Figures 2 and 3; Table S3). In general, levels of all cytokines showed large variability between patients, in both SC and plasma and on all timepoints. As an illustration, Figure 4 shows the individual data on cytokines for representatives of innate immune activation (IL‐18), Th2 (CCL17) and angiogenesis (Flt‐1).

Figure 4.

Individual levels of selected immune markers in infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) measured in the stratum corneum (SC) and plasma, at baseline (AD_T0) and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy (AD_T6) vs. healthy controls (Ctrl): interleukin (IL)‐18 (innate immunity), C‐C motif chemokine (CCL)17 (T helper 2 cell cytokine) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (Flt‐1) (angiogenesis factor). Differences in IL‐18, CCL17 and Flt‐1 levels between baseline and post‐therapy values were determined by two‐tailed paired t‐test or two‐tailed Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Benjamini–Hochberg corrected P‐values: ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Correlations between baseline levels of biomarkers and changes in disease severity (SCORAD and oSCORAD) and epidermal barrier function (transepidermal water loss)

To investigate whether baseline improvement in disease severity is associated with the baseline levels of immune markers and NMF, a Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was performed. The results are presented as a heat map (Figure 5a). In general, very few immune markers show a significant association between baseline value and changes in either SCORAD or oSCORAD (ΔSCORAD and ΔoSCORAD, respectively). Furthermore, the type of markers that were significantly correlated differs between plasma and SC. Among SC markers, a significant association was found for the chemokines IL‐8 and CCL17, and for the angiogenesis and vascular factors Flt‐1, SAA, sICAM‐1 and sVCAM‐1. For plasma markers, the strongest association was observed for TNF‐α, followed by VEGF‐A and CCL22.

Figure 5.

Spearman’s correlation coefficients (a) comparing baseline stratum corneum tape‐strip (TS) and plasma biomarker values with changes in disease severity [change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (ΔSCORAD) and objective SCORAD (ΔoSCORAD)]; and (b) comparing changes in biomarker values at baseline with corresponding changes in disease severity (ΔSCORAD and ΔoSCORAD). bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; CCL, C‐C motif chemokine; CRP, C‐reactive protein; CXCL, C‐X‐C motif chemokine; Flt‐1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1; GM‐CSF, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; NMF, natural moisturizing factor; PIGF, placental growth factor; SAA, serum amyloid A; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule; TEWL, transepidermal water loss; Th2, T helper type 2; Tie‐2, angiopoietin‐1 receptor; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. Benjamini–Hochberg corrected P‐values: ***P < 0·001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Next, we investigated whether changes in biomarker levels paralleled changes in disease severity. As seen from the heat map showing Spearman correlation coefficients and corresponding significance levels (Figure 5b), more immune markers showed a significant association with either SCORAD or oSCORAD, in particular those measured in the SC (VEGF‐A, Flt‐1, IL‐8, IL‐18, IL‐1β, sICAM‐1, CCL17 and CCL22). In plasma, significant correlations were found only between the changes in oSCORAD and TNF‐α and CCL22.

In general, the correlations were stronger with oSCORAD as compared with SCORAD. Baseline levels of NMF were not correlated with either changes in SCORAD (or oSCORAD) or their changes from baseline (ΔSCORAD and ΔoSCORAD). Severity at baseline as assessed by oSCORAD and SCORAD is highly correlated with disease severity after TCS therapy and changes in these severity scores from baseline (Δ values). The strongest association with baseline values was found for decrease in severity, ΔSCORAD (r = –0·50; P < 0·001) and ΔoSCORAD (r = –0·55; P < 0·001).

Discussion

Noninvasive testing of stratum corneum structural components and cytokines offers significant insights into the biological activity of AD in nonlesional skin.¹¹, ¹⁷, ¹⁸ We have previously demonstrated the utility of tape stripping as a methodological approach to characterize the immunological signature of the SC in infantile AD.¹⁰ Here we extend our work to show the effects of 6 weeks of TCS therapy on both the structural proteins of the SC, through filaggrin‐derived NMF, and cytokine profiles in the SC and the peripheral blood plasma.¹⁹ TCS therapy led to significant changes from baseline in the levels of immune markers; however, for some biomarkers the magnitude and direction of the changes differed between skin and peripheral blood. Both SC and blood showed a decrease in levels of Th2 chemokines and angiogenesis factors, while the changes in markers of innate immunity were found only in the SC. Interestingly, changes in levels of IL‐13, a key cytokine in the pathophysiology of AD,²⁰ were found only in blood.

There are very few studies in children in which cytokines were measured in the SC by tape strips, at the protein level.⁶, ¹⁰, ¹¹ The results in these studies show a consistent pattern of cytokine levels in the SC; the most pronounced differences between healthy and AD skin were found for the cytokines of innate immunity (decrease in IL‐1α and increase in IL‐1β and IL‐8 in AD) and for Th2 chemokines CCL17 and CCL22 (increased in AD). In contrast to these immune markers, less conclusive findings were reported for IL‐13.⁶, ¹⁰, ¹¹

Recently, He et al.²¹ performed proteomic profiling of a large number of markers of the skin barrier and immune response in nonlesional and lesional skin of adult patients with AD before and after systemic dupilimab therapy. Concordant with the present study, a significant decrease in CCL17 was found, while IL‐13 was not listed among the cytokines that were changed either in lesional or nonlesional skin. In contrast to the protein levels found in tape‐strip samples, increased levels of IL‐13 protein as well as mRNA have been found in skin biopsies,²² suggesting that local translation into protein in the skin is not the cause of the aberrant pattern of IL‐13 in tape‐strip samples. Highly increased IL‐13 has also been reported in most of the transcriptomic studies performed in tape stripping of nonlesional and lesional skin.¹⁷, ²³ Clearly, as previously stated by Lyubchenko et al.,⁶ IL‐13 in tape‐strip samples measured as a protein seems not to be a suitable marker in AD. Difference in biological half‐life, protein binding, transport from epidermis to the SC, or sensitivity of analytical determination may explain this.

Nevertheless, in the present study, several other Th2 cytokines such as CCL2, CCL17 and CCL22, and furthermore cytokines of innate immunity, angiogenesis and vascular factors, did show differences between healthy and AD skin at baseline,⁶, ¹⁰, ¹¹ and before and after TCS therapy, making tape stripping a useful technique for profiling biomarkers of a broad signature.

However, before implementation in research and clinical practice, there are several methodological issues that should be evaluated and validated. In tape‐strip studies, SC samples are collected from different SC depths (i.e. a different tape number, which only approximates exact SC depth). We showed previously that NMF gradually increases with SC depth, reaching a plateau at around the sixth tape. In the present study we used tape number four, before maximal NMF levels are reached.²⁴, ²⁵ Nonetheless, in our previous studies we showed a good correlation in NMF levels collected at different depths.²⁶ This has also been observed for various cytokines, which showed a strong correlation between the fifth and eighth tapes.²⁶ This is consistent with good concordance in proteomic data of cytokines obtained from the fifth tape (the present study) and from the 17th and 19th tapes in the study by Lyubchenko et al.⁶

Another possible source of variation is the distance from lesions at which nonlesional skin is sampled. In our recent study aimed at evaluation of spatial and biological variability of cytokines and NMF in tape stripping, we showed that the effect of spatial distance is biomarker specific but that levels of the majority of cytokines show a decrease with increasing distance, while IL‐1α and NMF show an opposite pattern.²⁶ This emphasizes the need for thorough evaluation regarding SC depth and distance from lesion by study design.

We made three key observations. Firstly, TCS therapies have a profound impact on the SC cytokine profile, with marked normalization across multiple cytokines including those associated with innate immunity, type‐2 immunity and vascular cell adhesion and angiogenesis. Given the pluripotency of corticosteroids, this is not a surprising finding. Secondly, we did not detect a difference in NMF, a good proxy of filaggrin expression, after 6 weeks of therapy, showing that expression of this key structural protein is unaffected by the anti‐inflammatory effects of TCSs, and NMF deficiency remains following 6 weeks of treatment.²⁷ For patients who have experienced good control of their AD following TCS treatment, this observation implies they have a residual epidermal barrier deficit and susceptibility to future flares, as is seen clinically.²

Our third observation is the most novel and striking: we show that 6 weeks of TCS treatment has a marked effect on the peripheral blood inflammatory cytokine profile. Two potential mechanisms could explain this observation. The first, and we suggest the most likely, is that the aberrant peripheral blood signature in infant AD is largely derived from the skin compartment. This is in agreement with a recent study by Pavel et al.,²² who showed a significant correlation between mRNA and protein expression of various cytokines, indicating local translation into protein in the skin and pinpointing the skin as the primary source for the upregulated proteins. A second potential but less likely explanation is that TCSs are sufficiently absorbed to have a systemic effect on immune profiles. Elucidation of the relative importance of these potential mechanisms is beyond the scope of this observational paper. However, the implications are potentially very important.

The association of atopic comorbidities in childhood AD is well understood on an observational level, historically termed the ‘atopic march’,³ and has some shared genetic basis,²⁸ but the mechanisms underlying these disease associations are poorly understood. It is plausible that leakage of Th2 cytokines from the skin into the peripheral circulation causes an expansion of the type 2 response, and primes other epithelial tissues such as respiratory, nasal, gastrointestinal and oesophageal epithelia to develop type 2 inflammation when provoked with additional challenges such as a viral respiratory infection.²⁹, ³⁰, ³¹

It is possible that aggressive treatment of skin inflammation in early childhood AD could control or reduce peripheral Th2 immune skewing and reduce exposure of other epithelia to a Th2‐skewed environment. The hypothesis that early and aggressive treatment of AD could lower the risk of subsequent atopic comorbidities could be tested in well designed, adequately powered longitudinal randomized controlled clinical trials. Some observational cohorts, where early and aggressive treatment appears to reduce the risk of concomitant food allergy,³² lend support to conduct of such studies.

To conclude, we demonstrate again the potential for minimally invasive skin tape stripping to disclose significant pathophysiological insights. We also show the systemic and local effects of short‐term TCS use and the potential for topical therapy in young children to profoundly influence their systemic immune profile.

Author Contribution

Maeve A McAleer: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Project administration (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Ivone Jakasa: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (lead); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Nicholas Stevanovic: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Irwin McLean: Data curation (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Resources (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Sanja Kezic: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (lead); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Project administration (equal); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (lead); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Alan Irvine: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Resources (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (lead).

Supporting information

Table S1 Topical corticosteroid therapy during the 6‐week treatment period.

Table S2 Cytokine/chemokine limits of detection and number of cytokines with concentrations below fit curve range in the stratum corneum and in plasma.

Table S3 Cytokine and chemokine levels (log‐transformed values) and differences between their levels in the stratum corneum and plasma of healthy control children and children with atopic dermatitis (AD) at baseline, and in children with AD between baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy.

Table S4 Severity of disease, skin barrier function and stratum corneum natural moisturizing factor levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy stratified for filaggrin genotype.

Figure S1 Stratum corneum natural moisturizing factor levels at baseline and after 6 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy.