Abstract
The percentage of respiratory and photorespiratory CO2 refixed in leaves (Pr) represents part of the CO2 used in photosynthesis. The importance of Pr as well as differences between species and functional types are still not well investigated. In this study, we examine how Pr differs between six temperate and boreal woody species: Betula pendula, Quercus robur, Larix decidua, Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Vaccinium vitis-idaea. The study covers early and late successional species, deciduous broadleaves, deciduous conifers, evergreen conifers and evergreen broadleaves. We investigated whether some species or functional types had higher refixation percentages than others, whether leaf traits could predict higher Pr and whether these traits and their impact on Pr changed during growing seasons. Photosynthesis CO2 response (A/Ci)-curves, measured early, mid and late season, were used to estimate and compare Pr, mesophyll resistance (rm) and stomatal resistance (rs) to CO2 diffusion. Additionally, light images and transmission electron microscope images were used to approximate the fraction of intercellular airspace and cell wall thickness. We found that evergreens, especially late successional species, refixed a significantly higher amount of CO2 than the other species throughout the entire growing season. In addition, rm, rs and leaf mass per area, traits that typically are higher in evergreen species, were also significantly, positively correlated with Pr. We suggest that this is due to higher rm decreasing diffusion of (photo) respiratory CO2 out of the leaf. Cell wall thickness had a positive effect on Pr and rm, while the fraction of intercellular airspace had no effect. Both were significantly different between evergreen conifers and other types. Our findings suggest that species with a higher rm use a greater fraction of mitochondria-derived CO2, especially when stomatal conductance is low. This should be taken into account when modeling the overall CO2 fertilization effect for terrestrial ecosystems dominated by high rm species.
Keywords: boreal trees, CO2 refixation, ecophysiology, leaf mass per area, mesophyll resistance/conductance, photosynthesis, stomatal resistance/conductance
Introduction
When illuminated, the CO2 concentration inside plant leaves, around Rubisco, determines photosynthetic activity (Campbell et al. 1988, Terashima et al. 2011). Although the majority of CO2 fixed may be derived from the atmosphere (Parkhurst 1994), there is a substantial amount of CO2 produced and released inside mesophyll cells through respiration and photorespiration (TL Sage and RF Sage 2009, Tholen et al. 2012, Sage and Khoshravesh 2016, Walker et al. 2016). The degree to which plants utilize this intercellular source of CO2, the significance thereof compared with atmospheric CO2, and whether any conditions promote the refixation of (photo)respiratory CO2, are all questions to consider when modeling the overall photosynthetic capacity of plants. For example, not incorporating mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion (rm) results in up to a 75% underestimation of the maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (Vcmax) (Sun et al. 2014a). Knowing more about the percentage of (photo)respiratory CO2 being refixed, Pr might be similarly important for accurate modeling of terrestrial CO2 uptake, especially when considering future increased CO2 conditions (Sun et al. 2014b, Sage and Khoshravesh 2016).
CO2 produced through (photo)respiration either diffuses directly from the mitochondria into the chloroplasts due to their close proximity (Sage and Khoshravesh 2016) or leaks to the intercellular air spaces (von Caemmerer 2013, Walker et al. 2016). Little is known about either of these pathways. If respiratory CO2 joins the CO2 in the intercellular airspaces, the probability of it diffusing into another cell, and being refixed by Rubisco, should be affected by the same conditions that influence CO2 concentrations in the intercellular airspaces overall. One major factor could therefore be rm, which directly influences the movement of CO2 inside leaves (Warren 2008). It is generally observed that lower rm facilitates CO2 uptake and correlates with larger concentrations of CO2 around Rubisco, increasing photosynthetic rates (Warren 2008). However, as respiratory CO2 is not diffusing all the way from the atmosphere, this does not necessarily hold true for refixation percentages. Rather, higher resistance to CO2 diffusion should lower the fraction of respiratory CO2 that escapes out of the leaf once it has left the cell it derived from. We therefore predict a positive correlation between rm and the amount of refixation that occurs.
Several studies show that cell wall thickness and the surface area of chloroplasts exposed to intercellular airspaces are among the most important factors influencing rm (Tomás et al. 2013, Jimei et al. 2017, Veromann-Jürgenson et al. 2017). However, the level of restriction of CO2 diffusion due to different anatomical traits varies among species and foliage structure (Tomás et al. 2013). It is likely that plant species with similar phenotypical characteristics, plant functional types (PFTs), will also have similar factors influencing rm (Chapin III et al. 1996). Plant functional types are often used in vegetation models for climate and land use monitoring (Lavorel et al. 2007), and while photosynthetic biochemical parameters and species-specific capacities for CO2 assimilation are described across PFTs for tree species (Wullschleger 1993, Wright et al. 2004, Niinemets et al. 2015), information on Pr and how it is influenced by rm is still incomplete. It would therefore be useful to provide more information about the fate of respiratory-derived CO2 for different PFTs to increase the accuracy of such models. Some major PFTs that have been shown to have very different physiological and morphological traits in the boreal zone are broadleaved, coniferous, deciduous and evergreen trees (Chapin et al. 1996). Significant differences in the leaf investment strategies of these types may be found. For example, boreal evergreen conifer leaves typically have thick cell walls, sunken stomata and resin channels inside the leaves (Grassi and Bagnaresi 2001, Ghimire et al. 2015, Fan et al. 2019). Morphological differences could be one explanation for significant differences in average Pr between the PFTs. Another way of separating plant species into types is sorting them according to pioneer and climax species. We know, for example, that pioneer species tend to have thinner leaves than climax species (Sobrado 2008, Han et al. 2010), as well as a tendency for higher photosynthetic rates per unit of leaf area (Bazzaz 1979).
In addition to anatomical differences between species and PFTs, leaf structure and organelle position may vary during a growing season: some evergreen broad-leaved tree species, such as for example Quercus glauca, have higher leaf mass per area (LMA) and net photosynthetic rates late in the growing season (Miyazawa et al. 1998). Furthermore, Miyazawa and Terashima (2001) found that the surface area of chloroplasts facing the intercellular air spaces on a leaf area basis increased within a period of up to 40 days after full leaf expansion. This merits exploring if Pr is influenced by seasonality and foliar maturation. Our hypothesis is that differences in leaf anatomy, whether due to functional type or leaf development stage, will correlate with differences in Pr.
Stomatal resistance to CO2 diffusion (rs) substantially affects CO2 concentrations at the photosynthetic sites (Wong et al. 1979). It is the most direct means for plants to prevent cellular water loss; stomatal closure (high rs) simultaneously slows diffusion of CO2 and preserves water by slowing transpiration (Wong et al. 1979, Schulze 1986, Franks and Farquhar 1999). However, as discussed in connection with rm, mitochondria-derived CO2 does not need to diffuse from the leaf exterior. High rs might therefore trap CO2 produced in the mitochondria and thus correlates with higher Pr. Furthermore, rs has a tendency to increase with increasing LMA when data are pooled from several PFTs and species (Onoda et al. 2017). Comparing rs and Pr across species and functional types should therefore give sufficient variation in rs for a correlation with Pr to potentially be revealed.
In this paper, we investigated anatomical and physiological traits that affected leaf-level CO2 diffusion. We considered if these traits also influenced Pr, and compared several plant functional types. In addition, we evaluated if and how these traits changed as the foliage developed throughout the growing season. Specifically, we tested whether:
(i) Evergreen and conifer species will have greater Pr compared with deciduous species. We suspect that this might in part be due to greater values of rm and rs, therefore;
(ii) The refixation percentage is positively affected by greater rates of rm and rs. As these physiological factors might be affected by leaf maturation, and thus during the growing season when measuring takes place, we therefore finally test whether;
(iii) Leaves show greater Pr, rm and rs later in the growing season, and whether differences in LMA, cell wall thickness and average area fraction of intercellular airspace have an effect on Pr, rm and rs.
Materials and methods
Study site and plant material
The plant material was collected in an open, mixed deciduous forest in Växjö, southern Sweden (56°50′26.6″N 14°49′20.6″E). The 30-year means, monthly air temperature and precipitation from May to September, averages around 12.2 °C and 618 mm. The climate is coastal temperate with mild winters. Data were collected in 2017. The average monthly air temperatures and precipitation in May, July and September that year were 11.9 °C and 16.8 mm, 15.3 °C and 39.7 mm and 12.2 °C and 63.1 mm, respectively (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute 2018).
Current-year folia samples from mature Roth. Betula pendula, L. Quercus robur, Mill. Larix decidua, L. Pinus sylvestris, (L.) Karst. Picea abies and L. Vaccinium vitis-idaea were collected from a south-facing site at 1.3 m (with the exception of V. vitis-idaea, where the whole plant was collected). Individuals were sampled at three different time points during the growing season: early (late May), mid (early July) and late season (late August and early September). Betula pendula and Q. robur are deciduous broadleaved trees, L. decidua is a deciduous conifer tree and P. sylvestris and P. abies are evergreen conifer trees, whereas V. vitis-idaea is an evergreen broadleaved shrub. In southern Sweden, B. pendula, Q. robur, L. decidua and P. sylvestris are grouped as early to mid-successional species (primary species), and P. abies and V. vitis-idaea are late successional species (climax species).
Eight to 10 branches per species were cut, brought back to the laboratory and placed in water, after which the stems were recut while submerged, avoiding cavitation. Other studies using detached branches have shown gas exchange measurements to be stable at least 14 h after sampling (Dang et al. 1997, Mitchell et al. 1999). We measured gas exchange no more than 8 h after branch collection. Leaves adjacent to the ones used for the gas exchange measurements were removed and prepared for microscopy (see Microscopy and leaf trait analysis section). This procedure was repeated at each time point of the growing season with the same species and the number of samples collected at the same site.
Gas exchange measurements
Gas exchange measurements were done using a 6-cm2 chamber of the LI-6400 and LI-6800 with red-blue light emitting diodes light sources (LICOR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The reference CO2 concentration was set at 400 p.p.m., block temperature at 25 °C, flow rate at 500 μmol s−1, relative humidity at 50 ± 10% and irradiance at 1000 μmol quanta m−2 s−1. These conditions were kept constant while the leaves acclimated to the chamber. The leaves were considered acclimated when the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance had reached steady state (usually achieved after 20–40 min). Photosynthesis CO2 response (A/Ci) curves were generated by sequential adjustment of the reference CO2 concentration between 50 and 1200 p.p.m. (400, 300, 200, 100, 50, 400, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 p.p.m.). A total of 156 A/Ci curves were generated. Values for stomatal resistance rs included in the results were taken at the first 400-p.p.m. CO2 concentration.
A/Ci curves were analyzed with the LeafWeb online tool and database (www.leafweb.org), which estimated the maximum rate of CO2 fixation (Amax), Vcmax, the maximum rate of electron transport for a given light intensity (Jmax), maximum rate of triose phosphate use (TPU), rm and Pr by fitting a modified version of the Farquhar--von Caemmerer--Berry model (Gu et al. 2010). LeafWeb calculates refixation percentage according to the equation presented by Tholen et al. (2012). The equation uses the fraction of respiratory and photorespiratory CO2 that has not escaped to the atmosphere; it includes the cytosolic partial pressure of mitochondrial CO2, the diffusion resistance to these molecules imposed by the chloroplasts, the resistance represented by carboxylation reaction itself, and the resistance derived by the cell wall and plasma membrane. The estimated amount of (photo)respiratory CO2 that escapes to the atmosphere is the leakage flux divided by the sum of the two fluxes originating in the mitochondria (Tholen et al. 2012). Hence, the relative fraction of respiratory and photorespiratory CO2 presumed to be refixed and used in photosynthesis, Pr, is estimated as 1 minus the relative amount of CO2 that escapes to the atmosphere, calculated according to Tholen et al. (2012)
![]() |
Here, rch is the resistance represented by the chloroplast, xpy is the cytosolic partial pressure of (photo)respiratory CO2 molecules, and resistance from the cell wall, plasma membrane and stomata is indicated as rwp and rsc, respectively. In addition, the resistance derived from the carboxylation reaction itself was included (
). For the reported values, the resistances are expressed in Pa s−1 m−2 μmol−1 because diffusion inside the leaf is a process driven by the gradient in partial pressure (e.g., Pa) rather than concentration. The conversion factor between rm (m2 s Pa μmol−1) and rm (m2 s mol−1) is given by
![]() |
Here, P is the total atmospheric pressure in Pa.
After gas exchange measurements, projected leaf area for L. decidua, P. sylvestris, P. abies and V. vitis-idaea was calculated using ImageJ (Schneider et al. 2012) and adjusted in the gas exchange output accordingly. All samples (either a 2.27-cm2 leaf disc from B. pendula and Q. robur, or the total leaf area used for the gas exchange measurement from L. decidua, P. sylvestris, P. abies and V. vitis-idaea) were subsequently placed into separate envelopes and dried in an oven at 70 °C around 48 h until dry. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were then used to calculate water content and LMA as described by Cornelissen et al. (2003).
Microscopy and leaf trait analysis
Leaf tissues (mid leaf, avoiding the major veins) from early, mid and late season were prepared for light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Samples of ~2 × 3 mm were fixed in Karnovskys’s fixative (5% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer) including a vacuum treatment, washed in the buffer and post-fixed in buffered 1% osmium tetroxide. Samples were step-wise dehydrated in a graded acetone series, infiltrated with three different ratios of Spurr resin to acetone and embedded in Spurr resin within flat molds. The resin was polymerized in an oven at 60 °C for 8 h. The samples were sectioned into semi-thin (3 μm) and ultrathin (50 nm) sections for LM and TEM, respectively, using a SuperNova ultra-microtome (Reichert-Jung/LKB) with a diamond knife. Light microscopy sections were left overnight on a hot plate to ensure proper attachment of the section to the glass slide and then stained with either Toluidine Blue, Safranin or periodic acid--Schiff and imaged in a Leica DM5000B microscope. The ultrathin sections were collected on carbon-coated copper grids and contrasted with 1% uranyl acetate and lead citrate (2.7% in 3.5% sodium citrate) and examined in a Philips CM 100 TEM at 80 kV (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The LM sections were made for all three time points of the growing season. Only samples from early and mid-season were used for TEM and subsequent cell wall thickness measurements. Hence, the cell wall data were pooled, and TEM data variation was not investigated for seasonal effects.
Images were analyzed with ImageJ (Schneider et al. 2012) with the ‘Trainable Weka Segmentation’ plugin to measure the area fraction of intercellular airspaces (Fias) in the mesophyll tissue from LM sections. The plugin allows a manual choice of colors for analysis of the pixel composition of the LM sections (see Figure 1). We used the average of two LM pictures per sample analyzed this way, resulting in a total of three samples per season per species (n = 54).
Figure 1.

Leaf anatomy and examples of anatomical trait measurements in B. pendula. (a) Semi-thin section stained with periodic acid--Schiff and imaged in a brightfield microscope shows the stacked layers of small palisade cells, air-filled spongy mesophyll, the stomata on the lower leaf side and phenol-rich epidermis cells, and (b) after image segmentation for area fraction of intercellular air spaces. (c) Ultra thin section of mesophyll cells imaged in transmission electron microscope visualizing the diffusion path defined by the cells and the intercellular airspaces. (d) Details from an area selected for wall thickness measurements. Bar = 100 μm (a and b), 2 μm (c and d).
Quantification of mesophyll cell wall thickness (Tcw) was performed from TEM images taken at 7900× magnification (see Figure 1), as done in Nafisi et al. (2015). For each species, 100 measurements were done distributed over three samples (three individual plants) for the mid-season samples, and two to three for the early season samples. As we pooled the data, the Tcw measurements are from a total of five to six different individuals per species.
Statistical analysis
Linear regression (ordinary least squares) was used to analyze the effects of rm, rs and LMA on Pr as well as the effects of LMA, Tcw, water content and Fias on rm. Analysis of variance was used to detect differences in Pr, rm, rs, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax, TPU, rd, leaf water content, LMA, Fias and Tcw between the species and growing seasons. Where necessary, the data were transformed to meet the assumptions of normality and equal variance, which were tested using Shapiro–Wilk tests and qq-plots. When significant differences between means were detected, Tukey’s honest significant difference test was used to determine which species or growing seasons differed (P < 0.05). All calculations were performed using R Studio Version 1.1.456 (RStudioTeam 2015).
Results
CO2 refixation is highest in evergreens and in climax species
The percentage of (photo)respiratory CO2 that was refixed inside the mesophyll (Pr) ranged from about 20 to over 90% (Figure 2). Functional type mattered (Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online, Figure 2), with the climax species P. abies and V. vitis-idaea showing significantly greater values of mean Pr (55.5 and 59.6%, respectively) than the early/mid successional species B. pendula, Q. robur, L. decidua and P. sylvestris, which displayed mean values of 41.8, 35.7, 42.0 and 40.6% (Figure 2, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). Deciduous species refixed on average significantly less CO2, only 40% of the respired CO2, while evergreen species on average refixed significantly more CO2, about 52% of their respired CO2. Deciduous broadleaved species had significantly lower Pr than evergreen conifers, with mean (±SD) values of 38.7 (±8.5)% compared with 50.1 (±15.9)%, (Figure 2). Deciduous conifer species (L. decidua) had mean Pr values of 42 (±9.5)%, which was significantly lower than the evergreen broadleaved (V. vitis-idaea) values of 55%.
Figure 2.

Percentage of CO2 refixed (Pr) for six different woody species, separated into functional group (deciduous, evergreen, and primary and climax species). The center thick line of each boxplot represents the median. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant statistical difference at the P < 0.01 level using Tukey HSD. N = 156.
We found a highly significant (P < 0.01) difference between species for the variables: Pr, rm rs, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax, TPU, rd, leaf water content, LMA, intercellular airspace and cell wall thickness. In addition, rs, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax, TPU, rd, leaf water content and LMA were also affected to some degree by seasonality with differences being specifically pronounced between early and late in the season (Table 1, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). The photosynthetic parameters and LMA were lowest early in the growing season, while at the same time, leaf water percentage was highest. Mean values of Pr, however, only changed significantly between seasons for two species: Q. robur and L. decidua (Figure 3, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). Quercus robur was not refixating as much CO2 during early season as compared with mid and late season, while L. decidua showed the highest percentages in the middle of the season. Although we expected rm to change throughout the season as the leaves matured, only B. pendula had a significantly (P < 0.02) lower rm early in the growing season (Figure 4, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online) compared with late season.
Table 1.
ANOVA results: The effect of species and growing season on leaf traits: Pr (percentage of respiratory CO2 refixed), rm (mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion), rs (stomatal resistance to CO2 diffusion), Amax (photosynthetic capacity), Vcmax (maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco), Jmax (maximum electron transport rate), TPU (triose phosphate use), rd (respiration in the light), leaf water content, LMA (leaf mass per area), Fias (average fraction of intercellular airspaces in the mesophyll tissue as estimated from light microscope sections), and Tcw (average thickness of mesophyll cell wall as measured from transmission electron microscope). F-values and p-values with species and light environment as main effects. Bold numbers represent p-values less than 0.05 (p > 0.05).
| Variables | Species | Growing season (early, mid and late) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-value | P-value | F-value | P-value | |
| Pr (%) | 14.4 | 1.6e−11 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| rm (pa s−1 m−2 μmol−1) | 3.6 | 0.0044 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| rs (pa s−1 m−2 μmol−1) | 15.0 | 6.49e−12 | 11.9 | 1.57e−05 |
| Amax (μmol m−2 s−1) | 12.56 | 3.5e−10 | 5.0 | 0.008 |
| Vcmax (μmol m−2 s−1) | 20.2 | 5.16e−15 | 6.0 | 0.00324 |
| Jmax (μmol m−2 s−1) | 13.6 | 8.04e−11 | 6.5 | 0.002 |
| TPU (μmol m−2 s−1) | 12.5 | 4.24e−10 | 4.1 | 0.018 |
| rd (μmol m−2 s−1) | 11.4 | 53e−09 | 3.8 | 0.024 |
| Leaf water content (%) | 7.3 | 3.97e−06 | 61.2 | <2e−16 |
| LMA (g m−2) | 182.1 | <2e−16 | 7.8 | 6.07e−4 |
| Tcw (μm) | 28.27 | 3.25e−07 | --* | --* |
| Fias (%) | 915.7 | 4.42–11 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
*Cell wall thickness data is from one point of the growing season (mid-season)
Figure 3.

Percentage of CO2 refixed (Pr) for six different woody species early (E), mid (M) and late (L) in the growing season. The center thick line of each boxplot represents the median. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant statistical difference at the P < 0.01 level using Tukey HSD. Differences were tested with Tukey HSD. N = 156.
Figure 4.

Mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion (rm) of six different woody species early (E), mid (M) and late (L) in the growing season. The center thick line of each boxplot represents the median. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant statistical difference at the P < 0.01 level using Tukey HSD. Differences were tested with Tukey HSD. N = 136.
Cell wall thickness significantly affected Pr and rm
Cell wall thickness (Tcw) was significantly greater in the evergreen P. abies, with an average of 1.2 (±0.08) μm, compared with the deciduous species B. pendula, Q. robur and L. decidua, which had a Tcw of 0.2 (±0.009), 0.22 (±0.02) and 0.39 (±0.08) μm, respectively (Figure 5). Although we had few TEM samples, we observed a significant effect between Tcw and Pr (P = 0.025, r2 = 0.18) and between Tcw and rm (P = 0.05, r2 = 0.15) using an ordinary least squares model. We found no support for a relationship between intercellular airspace percentage in the mesophyll and Pr, or rm (results not shown), but we observed a species variation that could be explained by functional type (Figure 5, Table 1, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). The coniferous evergreen species had significantly (P < 0.01) less air in their mesophyll than broadleaved species and the deciduous conifer (Figure 5). Light microscope pictures showed that average (±SD) intercellular airspace percentage in the mesophyll was about 38.2 (±9.7), 28.8 (±6.9), 35.5 (±6.0), 39.7 (±6.4), 15.8 (±5.5) and 21.7 (±5.1)% for B. pendula, Q. robur, L. decidua, V. vitis-idaea, P. sylvestris and P. abies, respectively (Figures 1 and 5, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online).
Figure 5.

Cell wall thickness (Tcw) of mesophyll cells, and average fraction of intercellular airspace (Fias) of leaves from different woody species. Which functional group (deciduous, evergreen, and primary and climax species) each species belongs to is indicated. The center thick line of each boxplot represents the median. Different letters (a and b) indicate significant statistical difference at the P < 0.01 level using Tukey HSD. N = 12 (cell wall thickness), n = 54 (average intercellular airspace).
rm, rs and LMA explain differences in Pr
We found a significant effect on Pr for rm, rs and LMA; all had positive correlations (Table 2). Although the relationship between rm and Pr differed among species, with some species displaying a negative relationship, a highly significant relation was observed across species (Figure 5). This species variation is not surprising considering that multiple morphological and physiological traits affected Pr (Table 2) and that these traits also varied between species and season (Table 1, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online).
Table 2.
Linear regression results: The effect of physiological and morphological traits on the dependent variable, Pr (percentage of refixed respiratory CO2). Model estimate from three (1–3) ordinary least squares linear models, with T-values and p-values in parentheses. Physiological traits: rm (mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion), rs (stomatal resistance to CO2 diffusion), and morphological trait: LMA (leaf mass per area). Bold numbers represent p-values less than 0.05.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variables | |||
| rm (pa s−1 m−2 μmol−1) | 5.77 (6.25, 5.13e−09) | 5.04 (5.51, 1.8e−07) | 4.90 (5.61, 1.24e−07) |
| rs (pa s−1 m−2 μmol−1) | 0.59 (3.51, 6.2e−04) | 0.63 (3.88, 1.7e−04) | |
| LMA (g m−2) | 0.05 (4.2, 4.74e−05) | ||
| Intercept | 36.7 (21.0, <2e−16) | 32.33 (15.7, <2e−16) | 26.35 (10.5, <2e−16) |
| Degrees of freedom | 134 | 132 | 126 |
| Adjusted r2 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.36 |
| F-statistic | 39.04 | 27.55 | 25.59 |
| P-value | 5.135e−9 | 1.005e−10 | 5.375e−13 |
Discussion
Evergreen and climax species are efficient in using their respiratory CO2
We showed that the two evergreen species P. abies and V. vitis-idaea had the highest Pr of all species measured (Figure 2). Efficient refixation of (photo)respiratory CO2 will be an advantage when stomata are closed, such as during drought, high temperature stress or during winter-hibernating periods. Conifers growing in mild winter climates can have significant carbon fixation all year round (Fry and Phillips 1977, Harrington et al. 1994), while conifers in colder, northern environments seem to limit carbon fixation to irregular periods with temperatures above freezing (Jurik et al. 1988, Schaberg et al. 1995). Being able to utilize even a small amount of CO2 without having to open stomata might be an advantage for evergreens, especially since there are examples of water stress (Kincaid and Lyons 1981, Teskey et al. 1984) and stomatal closure (Delucia 1987) being limiting factors of winter photosynthesis.
Although also an evergreen, P. sylvestris had refixation percentages that were more similar to the deciduous species. Picea abies and V. vitis-idaea can be defined as climax species, or ‘late’ successional species, while P. sylvestris and the deciduous species are all pioneer, or ‘early’ successional species in Sweden (Hannon et al. 2018). It is therefore possible, and a potential subject for further investigation, that climax species overall have higher Pr compared with the early successional species. It has been shown that early and late successional species can have different physiological capabilities; for example, early successional species seem to have higher net photosynthetic rates, both on an area and mass basis (Kloeppel et al. 1993, Matsuki and Koike 2006, Bussotti 2008). Pr could on the other hand be a trait that is more prominent in late succession.
Refixation percentage is positively correlated with rm, rs and LMA
A central point of our results was that higher rm, rs and LMA correlated with higher Pr (Figure 5). There were large variations in the data when all species were pooled, with some species even displaying a negative relationship to one or more of the above traits. However, all species that had significant relationships between Pr and rm, rs and LMA had positive correlations similar to the average trend (Figure 6). It is possible that some of the same adaptations or physiological states that increase rm and LMA also increase Pr. Alternatively, rm and LMA directly affect Pr. Both high rm and high rs can decrease photosynthetic activity due to a slowdown of CO2 diffusion to the photosynthetic sites from the exterior (Parkhurst 1994, Warren 2008, Jimei et al. 2017). This is the basis for our underlying hypothesis: a long, low-conductive pathway for CO2 diffusion (high rm) from the cell to the atmosphere, and closed stomata (high rs), would help capture (photo)respiratory CO2 produced in the mesophyll, increasing Pr. Our results are in line with this hypothesis. However, they also suggest that more factors influence Pr, which should be further expanded on in later studies. The same methods have previously been applied on some of the same species studied here (Eckert et al. 2020). There was no significant correlation between Pr and rm in the findings of Eckert et al. (2020); however, there was a positive trend. The previous article did find a correlation between Vcmax that was not obvious in the current study. It is possible that more data are needed in order to make larger-scale correlations obvious.
Figure 6.

Relationship between the percentages of CO2 refixed (Pr) and (a) mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion (rm), (b) stomatal resistance to CO2 diffusion (rs) and (c) LMA in six different woody species. Deciduous species are marked with circles, and evergreens are marked with triangles. Regression lines: (a) all species (black solid line, y = 36.7 + 5.8x, P < 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.22), B. pendula (dashed red line, y = 38.7 + 4.0x, P = 0.22, adj. r2 = 0.02), Q. robur (dashed gray line, y = 33.0 + 1.6x, P = 0.25, adj. r2 = 0.02), L. decidua (dashed black line, y = 43.4 + −0.8x, P = 0.75, adj. r2 = −0.04), P. sylvestris (dashed purple line, y = 40.6 ± 0.9x, P = 0.71, adj. r2 = −0.06), P. abies (dashed yellow line, y = 47.3 + 5.5x, P = 0.16, adj. r2 = 0.05) and V. vitis-idaea (dashed orange line, y = 37.3 + 7.5x, P < 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.43); (b) all species (black solid line, y = 39.8 + 0.56x, P < 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.17), B. pendula (dashed red line, y = 26.5 + 1.7x, P < 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.784), Q. robur (dashed gray line, y = 31.5 + 0.38x, P = 0.011, adj. r2 = 0.19), L. decidua (dashed black line, y = 37.6 + 0.62x, P = 0.14, adj. r2 = 0.05), P. sylvestris (dashed purple line, y = 32.6 + 1.5x, P = 0.06, adj. r2 = 0.12), P. abies (dashed yellow line, y = 51.7 + 0.4x, P = 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.23) and V. vitis-idaea (dashed orange line, y = 50.9+ 0.51x, P = 0.5, adj. r2 = −0.02) and (c) all species (black solid line, y = 41.6 + 0.034x, P = 0.012, adj. r2 = 0.035), B. pendula (dashed red line, y = 30.7 + 0.23x, P = 0.13, adj. r2 = 0.06), Q. robur (dashed gray line, y = 22.28 + 0.29x, P < 0.01, adj. r2 = 0.40), L. decidua (dashed black line, y = 19.51 + 0.25x, P = 0.025, adj. r2 = 0.15), P. sylvestris (dashed purple line, y = 44.6 – 0.01x, P = 0.76, adj. r2 = −0.04), P. abies (dashed yellow line, y = 62.9 – 0.02x, P = 0.793, adj. r2 = −0.04), V. vitis-idaea (dashed orange line, y = 67.5 – 0.11x, P = 0.344, adj. r2 = −0.003). N = 136.
It should be mentioned that the LeafWeb model (see Materials and methods) is using both stomatal and leaf conductance to calculate Pr. These factors are thus not independent from each other. The model assumes that changes in rm and rs lead to changes in Pr. While experimental validation is needed, the assumptions are justifiable because carboxylation does not differentiate between CO2 sources, whether from mitochondria or intercellular airspace. What should matter to the fate of mitochondria-derived CO2 is the relative diffusion-resistance to the carboxylation sites versus relative resistance to the outside of the leaf. In this regard, the fact that LMA (and cell wall thickness) had a positive correlation with Pr gives some evidence that this assumption is correct. Furthermore, the study by Busch et al. (2013) measured refixation directly and found that a continuous layer of chloroplasts covered the cell periphery. The chloroplasts captured the (photo)respired CO2 and boosted photosynthesis. Similarly, high efflux resistance due to chloroplast positioning is one of the assumptions made by the LeafWeb model. Busch et al. (2013) also found that refixating (photo)respiratory CO2 boosted photosynthesis more when ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations were low (200 μmol−1). Efficiently recycling mitochondria-derived CO2 has implications for water-use efficiency. During drought, high Pr would allow species to close stomata while keeping up a limited amount of photosynthesis. The meta-study by Ainsworth and Long (2005) showed that plants overall increase rs when exposed to elevated CO2. This might make (photo)respiratory-derived CO2 a larger fraction of the CO2 used in photosynthesis, especially in high rm species, such as the evergreens in this study.
We expected LMA to correlate with Pr because it can be a predictor of thick cell walls and tightly packed mesophyll (Niinemets et al. 2009, Onoda et al. 2017), which simultaneously enhances rm (Flexas et al. 2008). Although LMA also increases with more mesophyll layers, this does not necessarily increase rm if rm is measured per unit of leaf area (supplementary material in Sun et al. 2014b). In our data, rm and LMA were not correlated, which might be due to rm being measured on a leaf-area basis. A new paper by Veromann-Jürgenson et al. (2020) found that variation in LMA did not correlate to structural traits known to control rm across species. Veromann-Jürgenson et al. (2020) concluded that more detailed knowledge of the underlying traits affecting rm are needed for accurate prediction, and further showed evidence that chloroplast area exposed to intercellular airspaces and cell wall thickness are important drivers of rm. Likely, these two traits are therefore also important drivers of Pr.
Environmental factors should also be considered, as they have been shown to rapidly induce changes in rm (but not in LMA) for different species: increases in temperature generally lower rm until a certain threshold (Bernacchi et al. 2002), and soil water availability, salinity and growth irradiance may all affect rm (Flexas et al. 2008, Flexas et al. 2009). It would therefore be interesting to further investigate these elements in relation to Pr to further clarify if rm is directly affecting Pr, or another factor affecting both Pr and rm simultaneously.
Season, cell wall thickness and fraction of intercellular airspace
The point in the growing season (early, mid or late) at which the measurements were taken did not seem to matter for rm and was only significant for Pr in L. decidua and Q. robur, both of which showed highest refixation mid-season (Figure 3). However, most of the other physiological and morphological traits investigated did change throughout the growing seasons (rs, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax, TPU, rd, leaf water content and LMA, Table 1, Table S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). This is in line with previous findings that mature leaves from both mid and late successional species had higher photosynthetic rates than young leaves (Yu et al. 2020). The fact that so many other traits did change throughout the growing season shows that the leaves underwent some maturation, but that it did not have a great effect on Pr and rm. On the other hand, both L. decidua and Q. robur refixed more of their (photo)respiratory CO2 in the middle of the growing season, which means that for these two species, leaf maturation might have had an effect. In addition to anatomical and physiological traits, it is likely that the environmental conditions around leaves influence Pr. Particularly temperature and irradiance, as they are known to affect both respiration and photosynthesis, and as they have been shown to strongly correlate with refixation in photosynthetic bark of Pinus monticola (Cernusak and Marshall 2001). Another explanation for a seasonal effect on Pr for L. decidua and Q. robur might therefore be that these two species had a different response to the mid-season climate than the others.
Even though we do not have as many TEM pictures as Pr measurements, we did find a correlation between cell wall thickness and rm. Of the anatomical traits investigated in our study, cell wall thickness is known to have a strong positive correlation with rm (Tomás et al. 2013, Onoda et al. 2017, Veromann-Jürgenson et al. 2017). Species differences were found where P. abies had the thickest cell walls (Figure 5). It is possible that a stronger correlation would have emerged if species and growing season samples had been represented. This is also true for cell wall thickness and Pr, where we also found a significant, positive effect. Picea abies and V. vitis-idaea were the two species with the highest Pr. While we have no data on cell wall thickness for V. vitis-idaea, P. abies clearly also has thicker cell walls than the other species tested (Figure 5). In the literature, a close relative of V. vitis-idaea, Vaccinium oxycoccus, shows a cell wall thickness of 0.61–1.06 μm. If similar numbers can be found for V. vitis-idaea, it would be close to P. abies and significantly thicker than the deciduous species (Figure 5). Thick cell walls can thus be a predictor of high Pr. More data on cell wall thickness for different species would help investigate this further.
Comparing intercellular airspace between species shows that the two evergreen conifers had much more tightly packed mesophyll than the others, which is in line with expectations given their sturdy leaf anatomy (Niinemets et al. 2009). Intercellular airspace percentage has in some cases been shown to have an influence on rm. However, it seems largely to be determined as only affecting rm to a small degree, as CO2 diffusion in air does not meet much resistance compared with diffusion across cell walls (Tholen et al. 2012). This might then be the same reason it did not affect Pr.
Conclusions
When studying the percentage of respiratory CO2 refixation (Pr) between different species and functional types, we found that evergreen, late successional species, especially V. vitis-idaea and P. abies, utilized significantly more of their mitochondria-derived CO2 than deciduous and early successional species. Measuring Pr at various points of the growing season showed that Pr was relatively constant and that the two evergreen species had the highest percentages of Pr throughout the entire season. Among the anatomical and physiological traits we investigated, mesophyll resistance to CO2 diffusion (rm), stomatal resistance to CO2 diffusion (rs) and leaf dry matter content (LMA) were significantly, positively correlated with Pr. We suggest that this is due to higher rm and rs decreasing diffusion of (photo)respiratory CO2 out of the leaf. Cell wall thickness was significantly different between conifers and broadleaves, and cell wall thickness positively affected both Pr and rm in our study.
Our findings suggest that species with higher rm and thicker cell walls might be more efficient with their mitochondria-derived CO2. Pr should be considered when modeling the overall CO2 fertilization effect for terrestrial ecosystems dominated by high-rm species. This is because some species develop a lower number of stomata under prolonged elevated atmospheric CO2, or close more of the stomata (increasing rs). They might in that way be able to keep photosynthetic rates high enough while also preserving water. There are thus implications for water-use efficiency and overall CO2 drawdown.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Diana Eckert, Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden.
Helle Juel Martens, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Frederiksberg C, 1958 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lianhong Gu, Climate Change Science Institute & Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6301, USA.
Anna Monrad Jensen, Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden.
Funding
Financial support was provided by Swedish Research Council (VR), grant 2015-05083 to D. E. and A. M. J., H. J. M. is supported by the Center for Advanced Bioimaging (CAB), Copenhagen, Denmark. L. G. is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for DOE under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.
References
- Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005) What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165:351–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bazzaz FA (1979) The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:351–371. [Google Scholar]
- Bernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, von Caemmerer S, Long SP (2002) Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol 130:1992–1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busch FA, Sage TL, Cousins AB, Sage RF (2013) C3 plants enhance rates of photosynthesis by reassimilating photorespired and respired CO2. Plant Cell Environ 36:200–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bussotti F (2008) Functional leaf traits, plant communities and acclimation processes in relation to oxidative stress in trees: a critical overview. Glob Chang Biol 14:2727–2739. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell WJ, Allen LH Jr, Bowes G (1988) Effects of CO2 concentration on rubisco activity, amount, and photosynthesis in soybean leaves. Plant Physiol 88:1310–1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cernusak LA, Marshall JD (2001) Photosynthetic refixation in branches of western white pine. Funct Ecol 14:300–311. [Google Scholar]
- Chapin FS III, Bret-Harte MS, Hobbie SE, Zhong H (1996) Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change. J Veg Sci 7:347–358. [Google Scholar]
- Cornelissen J, Lavorel S, Garnier E et al. (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380. [Google Scholar]
- Dang Q-L, Margolis H, Coyea M, Sy M, Collatz GJ (1997) Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees, Roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiol 17:521–535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delucia E (1987) The effect of freezing nights on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and internal CO2 concentration in seedlings of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry). Plant Cell Environ 10:333–338. [Google Scholar]
- Eckert D, Jensen AM, Gu L (2020) The maximum carboxylation rate of rubisco affects CO2 refixation in temperate broadleaved forest trees. Plant Physiol Biochem 155:330–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan Y, Moser W, Cheng Y (2019) Growth and needle properties of young Pinus koraiensis Sieb. Et Zucc. Trees across an elevational gradient. Forests 10:54. [Google Scholar]
- Flexas J, Ribas-Carbo M, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmes J, Medrano H (2008) Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects. Plant Cell Environ 31:602–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flexas J, Baron M, Bota J et al. (2009) Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri×V. rupestris). J Exp Bot 60:2361–2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (1999) A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3plants. Plant Cell Environ 22:1337–1349. [Google Scholar]
- Fry DJ, Phillips IDJ (1977) Photosynthesis of conifers in relation to annual growth cycles and dry matter production. II. Seasonal photosynthetic capacity and mesophyll ultrastructure in Abies grandis, Picea sitchensis, Tsuga heterophylla and Larix leptolepis growing in S.W. England. Physiol Plant 40:300–306. [Google Scholar]
- Ghimire B, Lee C, Yang J, Heo K (2015) Comparative leaf anatomy of some species of Abies and Picea (Pinaceae). Acta Bot Bras 29:346–353. [Google Scholar]
- Grassi G, Bagnaresi U (2001) Foliar morphological and physiological plasticity in Picea abies and Abies alba saplings along a natural light gradient. Tree Physiol 21:959–967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu L, Pallardy S, Tu K, Law B, Wullschleger SD (2010) Reliable estimation of biochemical parameters from C3 leaf photosynthesis–intercellular carbon dioxide response curves. Plant Cell Environ 33:1852–1874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han L, Xie LJ, Dai KJ, Yang Q, Cai ZQ (2010) Contrasting leaf characteristics of trees and lianas in secondary and mature forests in southwestern China. Photosynthetica 48:559–566. [Google Scholar]
- Hannon GE, Halsall K, Molinari C, Boyle J, Bradshaw RHW (2018) The reconstruction of past forest dynamics over the last 13, 500 years in SW Sweden. Holocene 28:1791–1800. [Google Scholar]
- Harrington TB, Pabst RJ, Tappeiner CJ II (1994) Seasonal physiology of Douglas-fir saplings: response to microclimate in stands of tanoak or Pacific madrone. For Sci 40:59–82. [Google Scholar]
- Jimei H, Zhang W-F, Dongliang X, Jaume F, Yali Z (2017) Mesophyll conductance and its limiting factors in plant leaves. Chin J Plan Ecol. 41:914–924. [Google Scholar]
- Jurik TW, Briggs GM, Gates DM (1988) Springtime recovery of photosynthetic activity of white pine in Michigan. Can J Bot 66:138–141. [Google Scholar]
- Kincaid DT, Lyons EE (1981) Winter water relations of red spruce on mount Monadnock, New Hampshire. Ecology 62:1155–1161. [Google Scholar]
- Kloeppel BD, Abrams MD, Kubiske ME (1993) Seasonal ecophysiology and leaf morphology of 4 successional Pennsylvania barrens species in open versus understory environments. Can J For Res 23:181–189. [Google Scholar]
- Lavorel S, Díaz S, Cornelissen JHC et al. (2007) Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the holy grail? In: Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuki S, Koike T (2006) Comparison of leaf life span, photosynthesis and defensive traits across seven species of deciduous broad-leaf tree seedlings. Ann Bot 97:813–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell KA, Bolstad PV, Vose JM (1999) Interspecific and environmentally induced variation in foliar dark respiration among eighteen southeastern deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol 19:861–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyazawa SI, Terashima I (2001) Slow development of leaf photosynthesis in an evergreen broad-leaved tree, Castanopsis sieboldii: relationships between leaf anatomical characteristics and photosynthetic rate. Plant Cell Environ 24:279–291. [Google Scholar]
- Miyazawa S-I, Satomi S, Terashima I (1998) Slow leaf development of Evergreen broad-leaved tree species in Japanese warm temperate forests. Ann Bot 82:859–869. [Google Scholar]
- Nafisi M, Stranne M, Fimognari L et al. (2015) Acetylation of cell wall is required for structural integrity of the leaf surface and exerts a global impact on plant stress responses. Front Plant Sci 6:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niinemets U, Wright IJ, Evans JR (2009) Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and physiological variation. J Exp Bot 60:2433–2449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niinemets Ü, Keenan TF, Hallik L (2015) A worldwide analysis of within-canopy variations in leaf structural, chemical and physiological traits across plant functional types. New Phytol 205:973–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onoda Y, Wright IJ, Evans JR, Hikosaka K, Kitajima K, Niinemets U, Poorter H, Tosens T, Westoby M (2017) Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum. New Phytol 214:1447–1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkhurst DF (1994) Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. New Phytol 126:449–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Studio Team (2015) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. [Online]. R Studio Inc., Boston, MA. www.rstudio.com. [Google Scholar]
- Sage RF, Khoshravesh R (2016) Passive CO2 concentration in higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 31:58–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sage TL, Sage RF (2009) The functional anatomy of rice leaves: implications for refixation of photorespiratory CO2 and efforts to engineer C4 photosynthesis into rice. Plant Cell Physiol 50:756–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schaberg PG, Wilkinson RC, Shane JB, Donnelly JR, Cali PF (1995) Winter photosynthesis of red spruce from three Vermont seed sources. Tree Physiol 15:345–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulze ED (1986) Carbon-dioxide and water-vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 37:247–274. [Google Scholar]
- SMHI (2018) Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute [Online]. https://www.smhi.se/en (25 November 2018, date last accessed).
- Sobrado MA (2008) Leaf and photosynthetic characteristics of pioneer and forest species in tropical montane habitats. Photosynthetica 46:604–610. [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y, Gu L, Dickinson RE, Norby RJ, Pallardy SG, Hoffman FM (2014a) Impact of mesophyll diffusion on estimated global land CO2 fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:15774–15779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y, Gu L, Dickinson RE et al. (2014b) Asymmetrical effects of mesophyll conductance on fundamental photosynthetic parameters and their relationships estimated from leaf gas exchange measurements. Plant Cell Environ 37:978–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tholen D, Niinemets Ü (2011) Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 155:108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teskey RO, Hinckley TM, Grier CC (1984) Temperature-induced change in the water relations of Abies amabilis (Dougl.) Forbes. Plant Physiol 74:77–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tholen D, Ethier G, Genty B, Pepin S, Zhu XG (2012) Variable mesophyll conductance revisited: theoretical background and experimental implications. Plant Cell Environ 35:2087–2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomás M, Flexas J, Copolovici L et al. (2013) Importance of leaf anatomy in determining mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 across species: quantitative limitations and scaling up by models. J Exp Bot 64:2269–2281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veromann-Jürgenson L-L, Tosens T, Laanisto L, Niinemets Ü (2017) Extremely thick cell walls and low mesophyll conductance: welcome to the world of ancient living! J Exp Bot 68:1639–1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Veromann-Jürgenson LL, Brodribb TJ, Niinemets Ü, Tosens T (2020) Variability in chloroplast area lining intercellular airspace and cell walls drive mesophyll conductance in gymnosperms. J Exp Bot 71:4958–4971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von Caemmerer S (2013) Steady-state models of photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 36:1617–1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker BJ, Vanloocke A, Bernacchi CJ, Ort DR (2016) The costs of photorespiration to food production now and in the future. Annu Rev Plant Biol 67:107–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren CR (2008) Stand aside stomata, another actor deserves centre stage: the forgotten role of the internal conductance to CO2 transfer. J Exp Bot 59:1475–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282:424–426. [Google Scholar]
- Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wullschleger SD (1993) Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants—a retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot 44:907–920. [Google Scholar]
- Yu ZC, Zheng XT, Lin W, Cai ML, Zhang QL, Peng CL (2020) Different photoprotection strategies for mid- and late-successional dominant tree species in a high-light environment in summer. Environ Exp Bot 171. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


