Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89432-9, published online 10 May 2021
The original version of this Article contained errors. The Data Availability section was not included; it has now been added and states:
Data Availability
The datasets analysed in this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5140193
Additionally, an error carried over from earlier version of this manuscript has been fixed in the Results, where
“However, SD by reported orientations was unaffected (peak bias of 1.86° at Δ = ± 28°, deviation of about 6% toward the previous orientation, model fitting analysis: bootstrap p < 0.001; model-free analysis: t(14) = 3.02, p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.78), despite the target stimulus in the last trial and the present one could occur six degrees away in retinal coordinates.”
now reads:
“However, SD by reported orientations was unaffected (peak bias of 1.70° at Δ = ± 28°, deviation of about 6% toward the previous orientation, model fitting analysis: bootstrap p < 0.001; model-free analysis: t(14) = 3.02, p = 0.009, Cohen’s d = 0.78), despite the target stimulus in the last trial and the present one could occur six degrees away in retinal coordinates.”
The Article has now been corrected.