Skip to main content
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences logoLink to Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
. 2021 Jul 30;8:683671. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.683671

Dissecting Metabolism of Leaf Nodules in Ardisia crenata and Psychotria punctata

Florian Schindler 1,, Lena Fragner 1,2,, Johannes B Herpell 1, Andreas Berger 3, Martin Brenner 1,2,4, Sonja Tischler 1,2, Anke Bellaire 3, Jürg Schönenberger 3, Weimin Li 1, Xiaoliang Sun 2, Johann Schinnerl 3, Lothar Brecker 5, Wolfram Weckwerth 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC8362603  PMID: 34395523

Abstract

Root-microbe interaction and its specialized root nodule structures and functions are well studied. In contrast, leaf nodules harboring microbial endophytes in special glandular leaf structures have only recently gained increased interest as plant-microbe phyllosphere interactions. Here, we applied a comprehensive metabolomics platform in combination with natural product isolation and characterization to dissect leaf and leaf nodule metabolism and functions in Ardisia crenata (Primulaceae) and Psychotria punctata (Rubiaceae). The results indicate that abiotic stress resilience plays an important part within the leaf nodule symbiosis of both species. Both species showed metabolic signatures of enhanced nitrogen assimilation/dissimilation pattern and increased polyamine levels in nodules compared to leaf lamina tissue potentially involved in senescence processes and photosynthesis. Multiple links to cytokinin and REDOX-active pathways were found. Our results further demonstrate that secondary metabolite production by endophytes is a key feature of this symbiotic system. Multiple anhydromuropeptides (AhMP) and their derivatives were identified as highly characteristic biomarkers for nodulation within both species. A novel epicatechin derivative was structurally elucidated with NMR and shown to be enriched within the leaf nodules of A. crenata. This enrichment within nodulated tissues was also observed for catechin and other flavonoids indicating that flavonoid metabolism may play an important role for leaf nodule symbiosis of A. crenata. In contrast, pavettamine was only detected in P. punctata and showed no nodule specific enrichment but a developmental effect. Further natural products were detected, including three putative unknown depsipeptide structures in A. crenata leaf nodules. The analysis presents a first metabolomics reference data set for the intimate interaction of microbes and plants in leaf nodules, reveals novel metabolic processes of plant-microbe interaction as well as the potential of natural product discovery in these systems.

Keywords: metabolomics, plant-microbe interaction, nitrogen assimilation, natural products, GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR, SEM

Introduction

The leaf nodule symbiosis is an intimate kind of mutualism between plants and bacteria, in which the plants harbor endophytic bacteria in specialized glandular tissue inside their leaves (Horner and Lersten, 1972). Leaf nodule symbiosis has been reported in various species belonging to different genera of the three non-related dicot families Primulaceae subfam. Myrsinoideae (Amblyanthopsis, Amblyanthus, and Ardisia), Rubiaceae (Pavetta, Psychotria, and Sericanthe) and Styracaceae (Styrax), as well as in the monocot family Dioscoreaceae (Dioscorea). The identified bacterial endophytes belong to the order Burkholderiales within the Betaproteobacteria (Yang and Hu, 2018). Certain forms of associations which might present early stages of the development of leaf nodule symbiosis or divergence from early forms of leaf nodule symbiosis, have also been reported (Lemaire et al., 2012; Herpell et al., 2020). Most endophytic bacteria have undergone evolutionary genome reduction as result of this symbiosis to an extend that they are no longer capable of freely living outside their host (Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Carlier et al., 2016). Likewise, most host plants are no longer capable of surviving without their endophytes. When the symbiotic bacteria are experimentally removed, the plants lose vigor and may ultimately die (Yamada, 1955; Gordon, 1963). Because of this codependence of host and symbiont, the bacteria are transmitted vertically between host generations by infecting the developing ovule of the developing host-plant seeds (Pinto-Carbó et al., 2018).

Recent studies point towards production of specialized metabolites as the primary benefit of this symbiosis. Interestingly, it was discovered that certain natural products previously isolated from plants are actually produced by plant-associated microbes. Therefore, mutualistic systems of plants and microorganisms should be thoroughly investigated as source for novel biologically active natural products (Ludwig-Müller, 2015; Atanasov et al., 2021). Great potential can already be seen in the substances FR900359, a cyclic-depsipeptide isolated from the leaf nodulated plant species Ardisia crenata Sims and kirkamide, an aminocyclitol isolated from Psychotria punctata Vatke, a species better known under its synonym Psychotria kirkii Hiern (Sieber et al., 2015; Crüsemann et al., 2018; Lachenaud, 2019; Hermes et al., 2021). P. punctata was also found to contain the cardiotoxic substance pavettamine, a symmetrical hydroxylated polyamine, which is suspected to be the causing agent of gousiekte, a fatal poisoning of ruminants (Van Elst et al., 2013a).

Despite the enormous diversity and vast number of unique metabolic capabilities of bacteria only few genera have been studied for their natural products so far. To date, most isolated bioactive and antibiotic compounds from bacterial origin were isolated from environmental (soil, marine) bacteria or bacteria that are commensals or pathogens. Recently, bacteria living in symbioses with insects and nematodes have also been investigated as sources for novel bioactive natural products (Challinor and Bode, 2015). Biosynthetically, the non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), polyketide synthase (PKS) and NRPS/PKS hybrid metabolic pathways account for a vast amount of biologically active substances with high chemodiversity (Challinor and Bode, 2015). Putative NRPS and PKS gene clusters have already been found in e.g. Candidatus Caballeronia crenata, the symbiont of A. crenata (Carlier et al., 2016) and a novel bacterial ectosymbiont Paraburkholderia sp. Msb3 from leaf acumens of Dioscorea bulbifera (Herpell et al., 2020). Considering the metabolic capabilities of both, plants and bacteria, there is evidence that leaf nodulated species might be a great resource for novel biologically active natural products. Potentially, even substances produced by both symbiotic partners could be discovered. The vast number of antimicrobial and other biologically active compounds produced by bacteria suggests that, by harboring symbiotic endophytic bacteria, plants could get access to their metabolic capabilities. This could lead to an expansion of the plants’ arsenal of defensive agents against pathogens and herbivores providing increased protection and evolutionary fitness.

Here, we investigated the leaf-nodulated species A. crenata and P. punctata (Figure 1). A. crenata is an evergreen shrub native to India, East and Southeast Asia, which is widely cultivated for medicinal and ornamental purposes. The nodules inhabited by its species-specific endophyte Ca. C. crenata are restricted to the leaf margin (Kobayashi and De Mejía, 2005; Kitajima et al., 2006; Carlier et al., 2016). The rubiaceous species P. punctata is an understory shrub distributed throughout the subtropical regions of continental Africa and Madagascar. Nodules harbouring its species-specific endophyte Candidatus Caballeronia kirkii are found dispersed over the leaf lamina (Carlier et al., 2013; Lachenaud, 2019).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(A) Adaxial view of different developmental stages of Ardisia crenata (Primulaceae) leaves, from left to right: Stage I (developing leaf), stage II (mature leaf), stage III (oldest mature non-senescent leaf, distinguished by its position as one of the basalmost leaves still attached to the shoot of the plant). The symbiont-harbouring glands can be seen on the leaf margins and are indicated by red arrows. (B) SEM image of a cross section of an A. crenata leaf nodule, the symbiont harbouring tissue in the centre of the gland is morphologically distinct compared to the leaf parenchyma. (C) Magnified view of the individual endophytic bacteria of A. crenata. (D) Different developmental stages of Psychotria punctata (Rubiaceae) leaves, from left to right: Stage I (developing leaf), stage II (mature leaf). The symbiont harbouring glands can be seen distributed over the leaf and are indicated by red arrows. (E) SEM image of a cross section of a P. punctata leaf nodule, the symbiont harbouring tissue in the centre of the gland is morphologically distinct compared to the leaf parenchyma. (F) Magnified view of the individual endophytic bacteria of P. punctata.

To understand the metabolic interaction of bacterial symbionts and the plant host we applied a combined GC-MS/LC-MS metabolomics platform, which we use regularly for phytochemical analysis (Scherling et al., 2010; Doerfler et al., 2013; Mari et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). Using this platform our aim was to 1) detect metabolic differences between leaf nodule and lamina tissue, 2) reveal differences and common traits between the two species as indicators of specific symbiotic mechanisms and 3) investigate the interface of primary and secondary metabolism in leaf nodule and leaf lamina tissue. We also aimed to investigate the metabolic differences of leaf tissues with and without endophytic bacteria at different developmental stages to further reveal the potential of natural product discovery in these systems. Utilizing this metabolomics platform, we provide a first holistic view into the metabolome of leaf nodulated species highlighting specific metabolic features of leaf nodule interaction. We further isolated and structurally elucidated a novel epicatechin derivative potentially involved in plant bacteria interaction and annotated 3 novel putative cyclic-depsipeptides within A. crenata.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Cultivation Conditions

Ardisia crenata was obtained from the commercial supplier Bellaflora (Bellaflora Gartencenter, GmbH, Leonding, Austria), while samples from Psychotria punctata were obtained from University of Vienna greenhouse (Althanstraße, Vienna, Austria). Voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of the University of Vienna (Ardisia crenata: WU 0120874; Psychotria punctata: WU 0120875), and collection data and scans are available at the herbarium database system JACQ (http://jacq.org/).

The plants were cultivated in a climate and light controlled greenhouse at the Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology at the University of Vienna. In the present study, four different leaf conditions for P. punctata, as well as six conditions for A. crenata were sampled. The conditions were chosen based on the developmental stage of the leaf and whether the leaf tissue was nodulated or not.

Sampling and Extraction of Plant Material for Metabolomics Analysis

Five biological replicates were taken for each condition. Additionally, nine blanks starting from solvent extraction of empty tubes were included into the experiment. To account for biological variability and to get enough material from nodulated tissues, samples from four different individuals of the same species were pooled to create one biological replicate, as previously described (Doerfler et al., 2013). The different conditions were developing nodulated leaf tissue and developing non-nodulated leaf tissue, mature nodulated leaf tissue and mature non-nodulated leaf tissue. For the species A. crenata, the two additional conditions were oldest mature (non-senescent leaves distinguished from mature by their position as the basalmost leaves still attached to the shoot of the plant) nodulated leaf tissue and oldest mature non-nodulated leaf tissue (Figure 1).

For A. crenata the nodules on the leaf margin were harvested as the nodulated leaf tissue (dedicated as nodulated tissue) and the tissue near the primary leaf nerve as the non-nodulated leaf tissue (dedicated as lamina tissue). For the developmental stages, the first fully unfolded leaves were chosen as the developing leaf tissue (stage I). The basalmost non-senescent leaves on the lateral branches were chosen as the mature leaf tissue (stage II) and the lowest non-senescent leaves on the shoots were chosen as the oldest mature leaf tissue (stage III).

For P. punctata the nodules on the leaves were harvested as the nodulated leaf tissue by using a glass tube and a section where the nodules had been removed as the non-nodulated leaf tissue. For the developmental stages, the first fully unfolded leaves were chosen as the developing leaf tissue (stage I) and the lowest non-senescent leaves on the lateral branches or main shoots were chosen as the mature leaf tissue (stage II).

Care was taken not to include secondary nerves into the samples of both species. In addition, pooled samples of all conditions were collected for each species to be used in method development and method evaluation. The harvested plant material was put into 2 ml Safe-Lock tubes (Eppendorf®, Vienna, Austria) and immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Homogenisation was carried out using a Retsch® mill MM 400 (RETSCH GmbH, Haan, Germany). All materials were prechilled in liquid nitrogen and 30–50 mg of frozen plant powder was weighed in 2 ml Safe-Lock tubes (Eppendorf®, Vienna, Austria). The metabolites were extracted using a modified extraction procedure reported by Dettmer et al. (2011). One millilitre ice cold methanol (MeOH) (HPLC grade, VWR, Vienna, Austria) was added to frozen plant powder, the mixture was vortexed and sonicated in an ice bath for 20 min. After centrifugation at 14,800 rpm and 4°C for 4 min using a Fresco™ 21 Microcentrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) the supernatant was collected in 2 ml amber glass vials (Agilent Technologies, CA, United States). The extract was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen 5.0 (≥99.999%, Air Liquide, Vienna, Austria) using a REACTI-VAP III #TS-18826 Evaporation Unit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). The remaining cell pellet was re-extracted with 1 ml MeOH following the same procedure and the supernatant was again added to the glass vial. Extraction was carried out four times in total and extracts were dried until weight consistency was achieved. To generate two equal aliquots for GC- and LC-MS analysis, extracts were redissolved in 1 ml MeOH, separated into two 1.5 ml Safe-Lock Eppendorf® tubes and dried in a vacuum concentrator ScanSpeed 40 (SCANVAC, LaboGene, Allerød, Denmark) connected to a CoolSafe SCANVAC and VACUUM PUMP RZ 2.5 vacuubrand® (VACUUBRAND GMBH + CO KG, Wertheim, Germany). Extract weights were determined and samples stored at −20°C until analyses.

GC-MS Analyses of Metabolites

Internal standards were prepared as follows: stock solutions of 5 mM pentaerythritol (PE) and 50 mM phenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside (PGP) were dissolved in milliQ water and combined 1:1 (v/v) as internal standard mix. Ten microlitres were added to respective sample aliquots for GC-MS analyses and dried in a vacuum concentrator. Dried extracts were derivatized batch-wise directly before analyses by GC-MS. One batch consisted of 14–19 randomly selected samples, one blank and a standard solution of even numbered alkanes at 50 mg/ml in hexane (C10–C40, Sigma-Aldrich, Vienna, Austria) for determination of retention indices. A mix of metabolite standards was also included in different concentration in order to confirm metabolite identifications, resulting in MSI level I identifications (Supplementary Tables 1, 2) (Goodacre et al., 2007; Sumner et al., 2007). As the dynamic range of analytes within a sample was too high to quantify all peaks in one run, each sample and standard mix were injected in two split rates, 1:5 and 1:50, respectively. Low abundant analytes were quantified in 1:5. Analytes with too high abundances resulting in overloading the column and the detector were only quantified in analyses performed with a higher split rate of injection of 1:50 as indicated in Supplementary Table 2. Derivatization was performed as described earlier (Doerfler et al., 2013) with just slightly changed volumes of reagents. Fourty microlitres of methoxyamine hydrochloride solution in pyridine were used to dissolve the metabolite pellet. Including 80 µl of N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamid (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) the total derivatization volume was 120 µl. GC-MS analyses were performed using an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, United States) coupled to a LECO Pegasus 4D GC × GC-TOF mass spectrometer (LECO Corporation, MI, United States). Materials and instrument settings were used as described earlier (Doerfler et al., 2013; Nägele et al., 2014) with following changes: the Split/Splitless injector was equipped with an Ultra Inert single tapered glass liner with deactivated glass wool (Agilent Technologies Sales & Services GmbH & Co.KG, Waldbronn, Germany) and the temperature was set to 230°C. Oven temperature gradient was used as follows: initial temperature was set to 70°C, held for 1 min, ramped to 330°C and held for 8 min. Data were acquired using an acquisition rate of 20 spectra/second and a detector voltage of 1,625 V. Acquisition delay was set to 260 s.

LC-MS Analyses of Metabolites

For the RP-HPLC-HRESIMS measurements a method similar to the one previously described by Doerfler et al. (2013) was used. The plant extracts were dissolved in a concentration of 10 mg/l in a solvent consisting of (98% water, 2% acetonitrile (ACN)) + 0.1% formic acid (FA) containing the internal standards ampicillin, chloramphenicol and reserpine each in a concentration of 1 × 10−5 mol/l. After the solvent was added the samples were vortexed and sonicated to aid solvation. The samples were centrifuged at 14,800 rpm at 4°C for 10 min and 100 µl of the supernatants were transferred into glass inserts for analysis. The samples were placed into an autosampler at 4°C. Extracts were separated on an Accucore™ Vanquish™ C-18+ UHPLC column (100·2.1 mm; 1.5 µm particle size), equipped with an Accucore™ Defender guards pk4 guard column (150 –C18 10·2.1 mm, 2.5 µm particle size (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). The mobile phase system consisted of a mixture of solvent A, an aqueous solution of 0.1% FA and solvent B, ACN containing 0.1% FA. A gradient elution method was used for the analysis, 0–5 min 99% A, 5–60 min linear gradient to 1% A, 60–89 min 1% A, 89–110 min linear gradient to 99% A and 110–120 min 99% A. Ten microlitres of sample were injected with a flowrate of 0.1 ml/min and a 25 µl loop was used. The column compartment was kept at 30°C. Between each measurement a column washing step was performed by injecting a solution composed of (99% water, 1% ACN) + 0.1% FA using the following gradient, 0–1 min 99% A, 1–2 min linear gradient to 1% A, 2–47 min 1% A, 47–48 min linear gradient to 99% A and 48–68 min 99% A.

MS-analysis was performed in positive ion mode using an Orbitrap Elite Instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) with the following parameters: Resolution, 120,000; spray voltage, 3.8 kV; capillary temperature, 350°C; sheath gas, 5; auxiliary gas, 0. The mass scanning range of the MS1 fullscan was set at 100–1,800 m/z. Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane was used as lock mass with a m/z value of 371.101230. Each MS1 fullscan was followed up by a maximum of 10 data dependent MS2 fragmentation spectra, of the most abundant ion species. The time for dynamic exclusion duration of previously measured analytes was set at 30 s. The collision energy for collision induced dissociation (CID) was set at 35 eV. To reduce bias from measurement conditions, the samples were measured in sets that contained samples from each species and a blank arranged in a randomized order. Before the samples were measured, two measurements, each followed by a column washing step were performed to ensure system equilibrium. A solution composed of (99% water, 1% ACN) + 0.1% FA was injected for all non-sample-type measurements.

The internal standards were measured individually with the same HPLC and MS settings as the samples measured in the experiment, to gain accurate retention times, mass spectra and fragmentation spectra. The absence of internal standards or similar compounds within the original metabolite extracts was confirmed by measuring pooled samples of all tissue types of each species.

For metabolite identification standard compounds were dissolved in a solution consisting of 2% ACN in water with 0.1% FA added. The standards were dissolved at a concentration of 1 mg/ml, if the standards were not completely soluble at this concentration, the solution was centrifuged and the supernatant taken for measurement. The standard solutions were measured with the same HPLC and MS settings as the samples measured in the experiment. The standards were measured individually, to gain accurate retention times, mass spectra and fragmentation spectra.

Data Processing of GC-MS Data

GC-MS data were processed using the LECO ChromaTOF® software (LECO Corporation, MI, United States) as described earlier (Doerfler et al., 2013) with slight modifications. Peak areas of analytes were divided by extract weight and peak areas of internal standards. For analytes relatively quantified in runs injected with split rate 1:50, areas of phenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside were used and analytes quantified in runs with split rate 1:5 were normalized to pentaerythritol in respective runs. Peak annotation were done according to Metabolomics Standard Initiative (Goodacre et al., 2007; Sumner et al., 2007) and stated in Supplementary Table 2.

Data Processing of LC-MS Data

Initial untargeted LC-MS data analyses resulted in distinct metabolic profiles of each tissue type tested for each species consisting of about 2,500 m/z features detected per species (not shown). The datasets obtained for each species were curated based on m/z features that were detected in four out of five replicates in at least one condition.

In order to annotate the unknown m/z features all measured spectra were screened for over 800 known metabolites, as well as characteristic unknown m/z features. When a m/z feature was found within ±5 ppm of the exact mass of a known metabolite, the MS2 spectrum was extracted, if recorded, utilizing the Xcalibur software package (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and compared with a suitable reference entry within the databases NIST, MASSBANK and mzCloud if available (Horai et al., 2010; Mikaia et al., 2014; HighChem, 2019). Additionally, we isolated and structurally elucidated three natural products as described in section Natural Product Isolation and NMR analysis. The isolated natural products were measured by LC-MS and results were used to confirm the identity of respective annotations.

The m/z feature was annotated as the corresponding metabolite when the MS2 spectrum matched with the database reference spectrum. For unknown m/z features or m/z features without a suitable MS2 reference spectrum a manual annotation of their corresponding MS2 spectra were performed. The MS1, MS2 and reference spectra of the annotated metabolites were then summarized in Supplementary Table 3. The manual annotation of fragmentation spectra of m/z features is provided in Supplementary Data Sheet 1. The level of identification was determined for each LC-MS m/z feature according to Metabolomics Standard Initiative (Goodacre et al., 2007; Sumner et al., 2007) and stated in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Table of annotated m/z features detected within leaf extracts of nodulated and lamina tissues of Ardisia crenata and Psychotria punctata measured by LC-MS/MS.

Name RT [min] [M+H]+ [m/z] Exact mass [m/z] Mass accuracy [ppm] Sum formula MS/MS [m/z] Annotation level
Epigallocatechin 14.70 307.0811 307.0812 −0.3 C15H14O7 139, 151, 169, 181 2
Catechina , b 17.81 291.0864 291.0863 0.3 C15H14O6 123, 139, 151, 165 1
Epicatechina , b 19.47 291.0863 291.0863 0.0 C15H14O6 123, 139, 151, 165 1
Epicatechin 3'O-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-propanoateb 22.23 377.1227 377.1230 -0.8 C19H20O8 123, 139, 165, 273 1
Epigallocatechin gallatea 19.75 459.0915 459.0922 −1.5 C22H18O11 139, 151, 289, 307 1
Quercetin 20.24 303.0500 303.0499 0.3 C15H10O7 165, 229, 247, 257 2
Isoquercetin 20.20 465.1023 465.1028 −1.1 C21H20O12 303 2
Quercetin-dirhamnopyranoside-hexoside 20.20 757.2178 757.2186 −1.1 C33H40O20 303, 449, 465, 611 2
Quercetin 20.72 303.0501 303.0499 0.7 C15H10O7 165, 229, 247, 257 2
Isoquercetin 20.71 465.1028 465.1028 0.0 C21H20O12 303 2
Quercetin rha hex pent 20.71 743.2021 743.2029 −1.1 C32H38O20 303, 435, 449, 465, 597, 611 2
Kaempferol 21.11 287.0549 287.0550 −0.3 C15H10O6 165, 213, 231, 241, 269 2
Kaempferol-O-glucoside 21.11 449.1081 449.1078 0.7 C21H20O11 287 2
Kaempferol-O-rutinoside 21.02 595.1643 595.1658 −2.5 C27H30O15 287, 449 2
Robinin or isomer 21.11 741.2236 741.2237 −0.1 C33H40O19 287, 433, 449, 595 2
Kaempferol-O-glucoside 21.65 449.1074 449.1078 −0.9 C21H20O11 287 2
Kaempferol-O-rutinoside 21.65 595.1645 595.1658 −2.2 C27H30O15 287, 449 2
Kaempferol dihexoside 22.01 611.1608 611.1607 0.2 C27H30O16 287, 449 2
Quercetin 22.08 303.0493 303.0499 −2.0 C15H10O7 165, 229, 247, 257 2
Rutin 22.08 611.1599 611.1607 −1.3 C27H30O16 303, 465 2
Kaempferol-O-glucoside 22.84 449.1072 449.1078 −1.3 C21H20O11 287 2
Kaempferol-O-rutinoside 22.84 595.1644 595.1658 −2.4 C27H30O15 287, 449 2
Kaempferol-O-glucoside 23.82 449.1074 449.1078 −0.9 C21H20O11 287 2
Caffeoylquinic acid 15.97 355.1014 355.1024 −2.8 C16H18O9 163 2
Caffeoylquinic acida 17.67 355.1022 355.1024 −0.6 C16H18O9 163 1
Caffeoylquinic acid 18.34 355.1013 355.1024 −3.1 C16H18O9 163 2
Ascorbic acida 3.03 177.0390 177.0394 −2.3 C6H8O6 95, 121, 129, 141, 149 1
Dehydroascorbic acid hydrate 4.05 193.0342 193.0343 −0.5 C6H8O7 95, 147, 157, 165 4
Dehydroascorbic acid 4.05 175.0237 175.0237 0.0 C6H6O6 129, 139, 147 3
GSHa 3.62 308.0908 308.0911 −1.0 C10H17N3O6S 144, 162, 179, 215, 233 1
GSSGa 5.78 613.1585 613.1592 −1.1 C20H32N6O12S2 355, 409, 466, 484, 538 1
Ophthalmic acid 4.05 290.1345 290.1347 −0.7 C11H19N3O6 161, 197, 215, 227 2
Glutamic acida 2.38 148.0603 148.0604 −0.7 C5H9NO4 84, 102 1
Pyroglutamic acid 2.33 130.0495 130.0499 −3.1 C5H7NO3 84 2
Pyroglutamic acid 4.16 130.0499 130.0499 0.0 C5H7NO3 84 2
Asparaginea 2.34 133.0609 133.0608 0.8 C4H8N2O3 87, 97 1
Prolinea 2.47 116.0702 116.0706 −3.4 C5H9NO2 70 1
Methioninea 3.43 150.0583 150.0583 0.0 C5H11NO2S 104 1
Trimethyllysine 2.18 189.1595 189.1598 −1.6 C9H21N2O2 + 60, 84, 130 2
Phenylalaninea 11.36 166.0859 166.0863 −2.4 C9H11NO2 120, 131 1
Tyrosinea 5.43 182.0809 182.0812 −1.6 C9H11NO3 136, 147 1
Tryptophana 16.29 205.0971 205.0972 −0.5 C11H12N2O2 146, 160, 170 1
Kynurenina 11.23 209.0919 209.0921 −1.0 C10H12N2O3 94, 150, 174 1
Cholin 2.34 104.1068 104.1070 −1.9 C5H14NO+ 60 2
Creatine 2.64 132.0770 132.0768 1.5 C4H9N3O2 90 2
N-Acetylserotonin 20.76 219.1125 219.1128 −1.4 C12H14N2O2 160 2
Spermidinea 2.24 146.1652 146.1652 0.0 C7H19N3 72, 75 1
Pavettamine 2.03 252.1915 252.1918 −1.2 C10H25N3O4 82, 100, 118, 135, 210, 217 2
Pantothenic acida 14.18 220.1178 220.1180 −0.9 C9H17NO5 90, 116, 131, 174, 184 1
NAD+ a 3.89 664.1150 664.1164 −2.1 C21H27N7O14P2 232, 348, 428, 524, 542 1
Nicotinate d-ribonucleoside 2.74 256.0810 256.0816 −2.3 C11H14NO6 + 124 2
Riboflavin-5'-phosphate 17.84 457.1113 457.1119 −1.3 C17H21N4O9P 243, 359, 421, 439 2
Leucopterin 4.48 196.0463 196.0465 −1.0 C6H5N5O3 140, 168 2
Adenosine 8.09 268.1035 268.1040 −1.9 C10H13N5O4 136 2
Adenosine monophosphatea 3.30 348.0696 348.0704 −2.3 C10H14N5O7P 136 1
Guanosine 9.92 284.0992 284.0989 1.1 C10H13N5O5 152 2
Guanosine monophosphate 3.43 364.0656 364.0653 0.8 C10H14N5O8P NA 4
Cyclic adenosine monophosphate 4.90 330.0598 330.0598 0.0 C10H12N5O6P NA 4
Cyclic ADP Ribose 4.07 542.0666 542.0680 −2.6 C15H21N5O13P2 232, 428 2
S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine 15.96 298.0973 298.0968 1.7 C11H15N5O3S 136, 145, 163 2
S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine 3.14 298.0964 298.0968 −1.3 C11H15N5O3S 136, 145, 163 2
Zeatin glucoside 14.96 382.1703 382.1721 −4.7 C16H23N5O6 220 2
Disaccharidea 2.63 343.1234 343.1235 −0.3 C12H22O11 145, 163, 181 1
N-Acetylmuramic acid 3.95 294.1185 294.1183 0.7 C11H19NO8 186 2
N-Acetylmuramic acid 6.49 294.1179 294.1183 −1.4 C11H19NO8 186 2
Putative aminosugar 13.96 647.2878 647.2883 −0.7 C26H42N6O13 190, 319, 329, 462 3
Putative aminosugar 14.31 648.2719 648.2723 −0.6 C26H41N5O14 191, 320, 329, 462 2
Putative aminosugar 14.38 850.3661 850.3676 −1.8 C34H55N7O18 319, 462, 532, 647, 661 3
Putative aminosugar 14.47 851.3517 851.3517 0.1 C34H54N6O19 320, 463, 532, 648, 661 3
Putative aminosugar 15.24 689.2983 689.2988 −0.8 C28H44N6O14 232, 258, 329, 361, 458, 504 3
Putative aminosugar 15.31 719.3095 719.3094 0.1 C29H46N6O15 262, 329, 391, 458, 534, 630 3
Putative aminosugar 15.31 922.3883 922.3888 −0.5 C37H59N7O20 262, 391, 534, 701, 719, 833 2
Putative aminosugar 15.56 892.3788 892.3782 0.7 C36H57NO19 262, 361, 504, 532, 671, 689 3
Putative aminosugar 15.74 790.3464 790.3465 −0.1 C32H51N7O16 333, 462, 605, 630, 701 3
Putative aminosugar 15.83 993.4261 993.4259 0.2 C40H64N8O21 333, 462, 532, 605, 790, 833 3
Putative aminosugar 16.28 680.2769 NA NA NA 291, 458, 476 3
Putative aminosugar 16.29 476.1871 476.1875 −0.8 C19H29N3O11 258, 291, 329 3
Putative aminosugar 16.36 679.2664 679.2669 −0.7 C27H42N4O16 291,458, 476, 532 3
FR900359 48.38 1,002.5403 1,002.5394 0.9 C49H75N7O15 385, 456, 603, 799, 974 2
AC-1 44.25 1,032.5525 1,032.5500 2.4 C50H77N7O16 415, 486, 633, 829, 1,004 2
AC-SC 39.74 817.4335 817.4342 −0.9 C40H60N6O12 385, 456, 603, 688, 789 2
Putative cyclic-depsipeptide 31.76 1,123.5748 NA NA NA 385, 456, 506, 662, 773, 976 4
Putative cyclic-depsipeptide 35.12 1,123.5715 NA NA NA 385, 456, 506, 920, 1,002, 1,087 4
Putative cyclic-depsipeptide 37.36 1,123.5723 NA NA NA 385, 456, 506, 789, 931, 1,002 4
Putative cyclic-depsipeptide 42.33 988.5260 988.5237 2.3 C48H73N7O15 385, 456, 589, 674, 785, 960 2
Putative cyclic-depsipeptide 45.46 988.5248 988.5237 1.1 C48H73N7O15 385, 456, 603, 688, 799, 960 2
a

Confirmed with corresponding standard.

b

Confirmed by isolation and structure elucidation.

rha, deoxy-hexose; pent, pentose; hex, hexose; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulfide; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; ADP, adenosine diphosphate. The m/z features denoted as putative aminosugar correspond to anhydromuropeptides and their derivates. Annotation levels were labelled according to the metabolite identification standard published by the metabolomics society (Goodacre et al., 2007; Sumner et al., 2007). Level 1: the compound is identified with at least two independent parameters compared with an authentic compound. Level 2: the candidate was putatively annotated based on spectral similarity with public or commercial spectral libraries. Level 3: the candidate was assigned to a compound class based on spectral similarity to a known compound of a chemical class. Level 4: unknown compounds quantified based on spectral data but without further identification and classification.

The annotated m/z features were then integrated using Xcalibur Quanbrowser utilizing the following parameters: Exact mass and retention time of the annotated m/z feature, Mass tolerance: 15 ppm, Decimals: 4, Expected time: 600 s, Smoothing points: 3, Baseline window: 40, Area noise factor: 5 Peak noise factor: 10, ICIS Peak Detection: Highest Peak, Minimum peak height (S/N): 3.0. Since the mass accuracy of some m/z features in some of the measurements was higher than 5 ppm, the mass accuracy during peak integration was set at ±15 ppm. This was done in order to not lose parts of some peaks that albeit not having a mass accuracy within ±5 ppm were consistent in RT and MS2 spectra with the m/z features that were originally selected by having a mass accuracy within ±5 ppm. The integration borders of the peaks were corrected manually if necessary.

Natural Product Isolation

For natural product isolation an adapted method described by Seidel (2012) was used. Nodulated A. crenata leaf margins (123 g) were cut from fresh leaves and immediately preserved in liquid nitrogen. The frozen plant material was homogenized and extracted with 1,000 ml MeOH (2 × 2 days) in darkness and then filtered. The extract was dried under vacuum to yield 10.21 g of crude extract. The dried crude extract was suspended in water and then subsequently extracted with petroleum ether (PE; 1.9 g), chloroform (CHCl3; 10 mg), ethyl acetate (EtOAc; 300 mg), 1-butanol (1-BuOH, 2.23 g) and water (5.22 g). Crude extract and obtained fractions were measured by LC-MS as described above prior to further separation. The CHCl3, EtOAc, and 1-BuOH-phases were pooled for further separation by silica gel column chromatography. The silica gel was equilibrated in a mixture of EtOAc/PE 50/50. Prior to elution, 0.8 g of the combined extracts were adsorbed on 2.0 g silica gel and loaded onto the column. Then the column was stepwise eluted with mixtures of PE/EtOAc/MeOH: 300 ml 50/50/0 followed by 100 ml each of 40/60/0, 30/70/0, 20/80/0, 10/90/0, 0/100/0, 0/90/10, 0/80/20, 0/70/30, and 0/60/40. The collected fractions were combined based on their thin layer chromatography (TLC) profiles using silica gel coated plates and EtOAc/MeOH 9/1 as mobile phase. The fractions eluting with PE/EtOAc 20/80 were combined yielding 17.8 mg. Further separation by size exclusion chromatography was performed following the method described by Buathong et al. (2019). The fraction was separated by Sephadex LH-20 with MeOH as eluent to yield 1.4 mg of (1), and 7.7 mg of a mixture of (2) and (3) in proportions of 13:10.

The purity of the fractions was determined by LC-MS as described above and HPLC-UV-Vis analyses as follows: On an Agilent 1100 series with photodiode array detector (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) the wavelength of detection was set at 230 nm (reference wavelength 360 nm). A Hypersil BDS C-18 column (250 4.6 mm; 5 µm particle size) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was used as the stationary phase. The mobile phase system consisted of a mixture of solvent A, an aqueous solution containing 10 mM ammonium acetate and solvent B being MeOH. A gradient elution method was used for the analysis, 0 min 90% A, 0 to 15 min linear gradient to 0% A, 15 to 22 min 0% A. Ten microlitres of sample were injected with a flowrate of 1.0 ml/min.

NMR Analysis

Structure elucidation of the isolated compounds was performed via 1D and 2D NMR analysis according to Berger et al. (2017). For the NMR measurements ∼2.0 mg of isolated analyte was dissolved in 0.7 ml CD3OD and transferred into 5 mm high precision NMR sample tubes. The 1H, 13C and 2D spectra were recorded on an AVANCE III 600 NMR Spectrometer 600.13 MHz (1H), 150.61 MHz (13C) (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, United States) and performed using Topspin 3.1 software (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, United States). The measurement temperature was set at 298 ± 0.05 K. Residual CD2HOD was used as internal standard for 1H (δH 3.34) and CD3OD for 13C (δC 49.0) measurements. The NMR data can be found in Supplementary Table 4 NMR Spectroscopic data.

Combination of GC- and LC-MS Data and Statistical Analyses

The data matrices obtained by manual m/z feature annotation were reduced by only considering m/z features that were detected in at least four out of five sample replicates in at least one condition per species for further analyses. Missing values were substituted by half of the minimum value over the whole dataset, this was done separately for the GC-MS and LC-MS data and individually for each species. The GC-MS and LC-MS data were subsequently combined. Data were scaled by normalizing each m/z feature to the percentage of the highest value of said m/z feature. Statistical analyses were carried out using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, United States) and R. The following R packages were used: car, factoextra, ggfortify, ggplot2, gplots, multcompView, plotly (Fox et al., 2012; Graves et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2016; Warnes et al., 2016; Wickham et al., 2016; Kassambara and Mundt, 2017; Galili et al., 2018).

One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistically significant differences in the datasets. The validity of applying the one-way ANOVA was determined by applying Levene- and Shapiro tests to the datasets (Levene, 1961; Shapiro and Wilk, 1965). Although, the requirements for equal variances and normal distribution seemed mostly fulfilled by the datasets a Kruskal-Wallis test was also employed on the datasets to compare the results with the one-way ANOVA (Kruskal and Wallis, 1952). The resulting significant m/z features of both tests were compared. The overlap of statistically significant m/z features were 85.8% for the A. crenata- and 87.6% for the P. punctata dataset. Based on studies by Vinaixa et al. (2012) these results were deemed sufficient to use the one-way ANOVA approach for further analyses.

The statistically significant m/z features obtained by the one-way ANOVA were visualized as heatmaps employing hierarchical bicluster analyses. (Supplementary Images 1, 2) In order to find statistically significant differences for each m/z feature between the tissues a Tukey's range test (within a 95% confidence interval) was used on the statistically significant m/z features (Tukey, 1949). Additionally, boxplots of each m/z feature were created with the results of the Tukey’s range test included (Supplementary Data Sheets 2, 3).

A principal component analysis (PCA) (Lopes-Santos et al., 2017) was also performed on the datasets. The data used contained all annotated metabolites, including those not found to be statistically significant. For PCA analysis the datasets were centered and scaled. The eigenvalues of the principal components were plotted in Scree plots (Cattell, 1966). In order to determine whether the differences between groups were statistically significant, the scores for each PCA were extracted and normalized to 100%. A one-way ANOVA was performed on the normalized principal components, followed by a Tukey's range test (within a 95% confidence interval) to determine the differences between the tissues.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements of P. punctata leaves were performed with IMAGING-PAM M-Series (mini/B2) Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Heinz Walz, Germany).

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Fresh leaf cross sections containing leaf nodules were fixed in FAA (40% formaldehyde (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), acetic acid (Fisher Scientific (Austria), Vienna, Austria), 70% ethanol (AustrAlco, Spillern, Austria) 5v/5v/90v) and washed in 70% ethanol. After dehydration in a series of ethanol (85%, 96%) and acetone (Sigma-Aldrich Handels Gmbh, Vienna, Austria), the samples were critical point dried, mounted on aluminium stubs and sputter coated with gold using a sputter coater SCD 050. The samples were observed with a scanning electron microscope JSM-IT300 (JEOL, Freising, Germany) under high vacuum with 10.0 kV. Photos were taken with a magnification of ×85 and ×4,000.

Results

Metabolic Signature of Leaf Nodules is Age Dependent and Species Specific

To investigate the differences in metabolic signatures of leaf tissue and nodulated (leaf) tissue we applied a combined GC-MS and LC-MS platform (Figure 2). Both platforms cover complementary parts of the metabolism, namely, primary and secondary metabolites, respectively (Weckwerth, 2011; Doerfler et al., 2013; Mari et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016a). Through an untargeted GC-MS analysis we were able detect 203 distinguishable compounds that were manually curated (Supplementary Table 2) and through an untargeted LC-MS analysis we extended this dataset by more than 2,500 m/z features per species. After m/z feature selection and annotation the combined LC-MS and GC-MS datasets contained 276 and 255 metabolites for A. crenata and P. punctata, respectively. Of these m/z features 193 (57.1%) were detected in both species. These m/z features belonged to a wide variety of compound classes, here categorized as follows: amino acids, organic acids, carbohydrates, phenolics, polyamines, flavonoids, nucleotides, peptides and cofactors. The curated LC-MS m/z features are listed within (Supplementary Table 3).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Overview for the workflow utilizing a combined GC-MS and LC-MS platform in addition with natural product isolation and characterisation to dissect the leaf and leaf nodule metabolism and function in the nodulated species Ardisia crenata and Psychotria punctata.

To explore the relationship between the samples we first performed a principal component analysis (PCA) on the combined LC-MS and GC-MS datasets. Within the PCA, species and tissue specific separations can be observed (Figure 3). According to leaf maturity the samples were subdivided into two (P. punctata) or three (A. crenata) age-stages, ranging from developing (stage I) to mature (stage II) and oldest mature (stage III) leaves (Figure 1). All tissues have a unique and distinguishable metabolic composition, except for the stage II tissues from A. crenata, which largely overlap with the respective stage III tissues.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(A) PCA analysis of 338 centered and scaled m/z features from LC-MS and GC-MS analysis of Ardisia crenata and Psychotria punctata lamina tissue and nodule extracts. (B) PCA analysis of 276 centered and scaled m/z features from LC-MS and GC-MS analysis of Ardisia crenata lamina tissue and nodule extracts. (C) PCA analysis of 255 centered and scaled m/z features from LC-MS and GC-MS analysis of Psychotria punctata lamina tissue and nodule extracts.

In individual PCA plots for each species (Figures 3B,C) separations can be observed more clearly. In A. crenata (Figure 3B) a significant separation between stage II and stage III nodulated tissues and all other tissue types occurred along principal component (PC) 1. On PC2 the lamina samples cluster according to their age. Stage I nodulated tissue samples align with laminar samples on PC1 but also separate from these along PC2.

For P. punctata (Figure 3C) a very similar pattern to A. crenata can be observed. Separation by age can be seen on PC1 and nodulated and lamina tissues separate along PC2.

A one-way ANOVA was performed on both datasets to dissect statistically significant changes between relative abundances of all detected m/z features (Figures 4, 5). It resulted in 198 (71.7% out of 276 initial m/z features) and 167 (65.5% out of 255 initial m/z features) statistically significant m/z features for A. crenata and P. punctata, respectively. These m/z features were further subjected to hierarchical bicluster and hierarchical cluster analyses and the results were visualized in the form of heatmaps (Figures 4, 5). The results of the hierarchical bicluster analysis show a similar pattern to the PCAs: Biological replicates of the same tissue cluster together and different tissue types are well distinguishable. Again, the exceptions are stage III tissue samples from A. crenata that are very similar to their respective younger stages (stage II). The PCA and hierarchical bicluster analysis suggest that in both species initial differences within and between nodulated and lamina tissues gradually increase with age. For A. crenata this effect subsides at a certain tissue maturity.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(A) Heatmap of a hierarchical bicluster analysis of statistically significant changed nodule specific metabolites of Ardisia crenata tissue extracts (selected metabolite names do not correspond with rows). The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition. (B) Heatmap of a hierarchical cluster analysis of metabolites annotated as flavonoids of A. crenata tissue extracts. The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition. (C) Heatmap of a hierarchical cluster analysis of metabolites annotated as anhydromuropeptdides of A. crenata tissue extracts. The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition. (D) Heatmap of a hierarchical cluster analysis of metabolites annotated as cyclic-depsipeptides of A. crenata tissue extracts. The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

(A) Heatmap of a hierarchical bicluster analysis of statistically significant changed nodule specific metabolites of Psychotria punctata tissue extracts (selected metabolite names do not corresponds with rows). The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition. (B) Heatmap of a hierarchical cluster analysis of m/z features annotated as flavonoids of P. punctata tissue extracts. The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition. (C) Heatmap of a hierarchical cluster analysis of m/z features annotated as anhydromuropeptdides of P. punctata tissue extracts. The columns correspond to the five biological replicates of each condition.

In the following we analyze the common metabolic signatures of leaf nodulation as well as species- and age-specific differences in these datasets according to their biological relevance, compound class and pathway contributions.

Anhydromuropeptides are Characteristic for Leaf Nodule Tissue but Compounds Assigned Putative Symbiotic Functions are Species Specific

We explored the datasets with respect to common nodule specific features: 13 m/z features, initially annotated as putative aminosugars, were detected in samples from both species and displayed higher relative abundances in nodulated tissues (Figures 4C, 5C). These metabolites ranged from 476 to 993 m/z and based on their MS2 fragmentation patterns (Packiam et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016) we identified them as anhydromuropeptides (AhMPs) (Figure 6C). Within both species these putative AhMPs are highly characteristic for nodulated tissues (Figures 4, 5). We detected a broad variety of these compounds ranging from native AhMP to diaminopimelic acid amidated and N-acetylated diaminopimelic acid amide AhMPs. Interestingly, a distinct change in AhMP composition within the tissues, by age, was observed in both species. Three AhMPs accumulated with progressing age in both species (putative aminosugars with m/z values 647, 648, and 790) (Figures 4C, 5C). Differences in relative AhMP abundance between lamina and nodulated tissues are higher in A. crenata, this effect could be related to bacterial activity (see Discussion).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

(A) Structures of flavan-3-ol derivatives isolated from nodulated Ardisia crenata leaf tissues. (B) NMR analysis of these flavan-3-ol derivatives. (C) Annotated ESI-MS2 spectrum (pos. mode, CID fragmentation) of anhydromuropeptide with a precursor m/z 922.39 in LC-MS analyses of Psychotria punctata leaf nodule sample.

With respect to species-specific compounds we identified putative cyclic-depsipeptides related to FR900359 based on their MS2 fragmentation patterns (Reher et al., 2018) (Figure 4D). This biologically active compound is produced by the A. crenata endophyte Candidatus Caballeronia crenata (Schrage et al., 2015; Carlier et al., 2016; Crüsemann et al., 2018). These peptides were only detected within samples of A. crenata and were generally more abundant in nodulated tissue and their abundance there strongly increased with progressing age (Figures 4D, 7).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Heatmap of z-scored means of selected m/z features of Ardisia crenata tissue extracts illustrated within their connected metabolic pathways. Possible metabolite transport is denoted by a blue arrow and possible signaling is denoted by a red arrow.

Similarly, pavettamine, also annotated based on its MS2 fragmentation pattern (Bode et al., 2010), could only be detected in samples originating from P. punctata (Figure 8; Supplementary Image 2). Pavettamine is a polyamine and causative agent of Gousiekte, a disease of ruminants, and has been brought into connection with leaf endophytes in Rubiaceae (Verstraete et al., 2011; Van Elst et al., 2013b; Brader et al., 2014). It was, however, not nodule-specific and increased with age in both tissue types. Despite our efforts to detect kirkamide, a C7N aminocyclitol from the leaf nodule symbiont of P. punctata (formerly P. kirkii) (Sieber et al., 2015), we were not able to identify it with certainty.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Heatmap of z-scored means of selected m/z features of Psychotria punctata tissue extracts illustrated within their connected metabolic pathways. Possible metabolite transport is denoted by a blue arrow and possible signaling is denoted by a red arrow.

Flavonoid Signatures Are Highly Species Specific but Only Nodule Associated in A. crenata

Because of their diverse functions in regulating plant development and their possible roles in defense and signaling between plants and microorganisms (Mathesius, 2018) we directed our efforts at investigating and identifying flavonoids in the symbiotic plants. We observed drastically different flavonoid compositions in both plants (Calixto et al., 2016; Wong et al., 2020) as well as variations between tissue types.

In A. crenata we were able to identify several flavonoids that belong to both flavonols and flavan-3-ols. Catechin, epigallocatechin, and isoquercetin were all enriched in nodulated tissues (Figure 4A). Two kaempferol derivates, kaempferol-dihexoside and kaempferol-O-rutinoside, were also nodule specific, although they appear to only be enriched in the younger (stage I and some stage II) nodulated tissues.

We also found an unknown flavan-3-ol that was consistently differentially abundant throughout the A. crenata dataset with elevated relative levels in colonized tissues of all age stages (Figures 4A,B). The compound was purified and, along with other flavonoids, identified via NMR and HRMS (Figure 6). In total, three natural products were obtained from nodulated leaf tissues of A. crenata (Figures 6A,B). The structure of the novel flavan-3-ol was elucidated as epicatechin 3'O-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-propanoate (henceforth labeled as (1) in Figures 2, 4, 6, see also Supplementary Table 4 NMR Spectroscopic data) and the other two were found to be catechin (2) and epicatechin (3) (Figures 6A,B). For clarity, the epicatechin moiety of (1) and (3) are illustrated as (-)-epicatechin and (2) is illustrated as (+)-catechin, however their absolute configuration was not determined within this study (Figures 6A,B). Spectroscopic data are consistent with data reported for catechin and epicatechin described in the literature (Davis et al., 1996; El-Razek, 2007). The cis conformation of (1) can be inferred through the small coupling constant between the protons of carbon positions 2 and 3 (Figure 6A). This could be caused by the near 90° dihedral angle between the protons, which occurs in the cis conformation of the molecule and, following the Karplus equation, should yield a 3 J H,H of near 0. In contrast, the trans conformation of (2) yields a higher 3 J H,H (Karplus, 1959), a result of the dihedral angle of these protons being near 180°. For epicatechin 3'O-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-propanoate (1) the conformation at the stereocenter at 2'' could not be resolved. All necessary spectral information can be found within Supplementary Table 4 NMR Spectroscopic data. In P. punctata the detected flavonoid levels were similar in stage I tissues, irrespective of the tissue type. Flavonoid abundance generally decreased with age in nodulated tissues. We only identified flavonols within this species. Flavan-3-ols including the novel epicatechin 3'O-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-propanoate (1) isolated from A. crenata were not detected in P. punctata (for further information see Discussion).

Citric Acid Accumulates in Developing Nodules and Trehalose and Maltose are Age-independent Nodule Markers

To investigate central carbohydrate and energy metabolisms we took a look at various common carbon substrates. Increased relative abundances of trehalose and maltose were observed in nodulated tissues of both plant species (Figures 7, 8). The relative abundances of glucose, fructose, galactose, and sucrose on the other hand are higher within the lamina tissue types of both species throughout their development.

Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle related organic acids are mostly characteristic for young developing tissues. Their relative abundance is generally higher within the laminar tissues. There are, however, some exceptions. In both species the highest citric acid levels were detected within the still developing nodulated tissues (Figures 7, 8). In A. crenata this pattern was also observed for malate and succinate (Figure 7). Furthermore, 2-methylcitric acid was also found to be highly characteristic for nodulated A. crenata tissues, with increasing relative abundance by age (Figure 4).

Amino Acid and Polyamines Are Abundant in Both Plants’ Nodule Tissues

As obligate leaf symbionts have been reported to carry largely eroded genomes and, as a consequence, are likely deficient in the biosynthesis of various amino acids (AAs) (Carlier and Eberl., 2012; Carlier et al., 2016) we examined their respective distributions across our dataset. At first glance the amino acid and polyamine signatures in both species showed a clear pattern: most of the detected amino acids and polyamines accumulated in nodulated tissues. Especially the branched chain amino acids (BCAA) leucine, isoleucine and valine were highly characteristic for nodulated tissues of both species (Figures 7, 8). Proline and trimethyllysine (a betaine) were also generally abundant in nodule tissue.

There were, however, some subtle differences between the two leaf nodulated species that are worth mentioning: Threonine occurred at elevated levels only within the lamina tissues of A. crenata and, similarly, phenylalanine was more abundant in laminar samples in this species than in its nodules. Generally, AAs were more abundant in nodular than in laminar tissue with a very clear pattern in P. punctata (Figure 8) and a more complex tendency in A. crenata (Figure 7).

Naturally, AAs could function as nitrogen as well as carbon sources for obligate endophytes (Moe, 2013). Polyamines could constitute another form of nitrogen source but could also act as signal or regulatory molecules. Putrescine, for example, was highly characteristic for colonized tissues (Figures 7, 8). In A. crenata that signature strongly increased with maturity. Additionally, spermidine levels within mature (stage II and III) nodulated tissues in A. crenata (Figure 7) were also elevated (see also Discussion).

Nucleotides, Cofactors and Cytokinin Phytohormone Derivative are Common Nodule Markers

Adenosine, adenosine monophosphate, guanosine, and guanosine monophosphate were detected in tissues of both species. The relative abundances of these metabolites were higher within the nodulated tissues and decreased with age (Figures 7, 8). Cyclic adenosine monophosphate, which can be linked to bacterial signaling (Gomelsky, 2011), was only found within tissues of P. punctata. The highest relative abundance of this metabolite was found within the nodulated tissues. NAD+, nicotinate-d-ribonucleoside, leucopterin and riboflavin-5'-phosphate were detected in tissues of both species (Figures 4, 5, 7, 8). These metabolites were all present at elevated levels within the nodulated tissues and their relative abundances increased with age. The levels of these nucleotide derived cofactors are inversely correlated to the ones we observed for their biosynthetic precursors.

The only phytohormone derivative found in both species was annotated as zeatin glucoside, a cytokinin derivative. Its abundance increased with age and it was generally more abundant within colonized tissues (Figures 7, 8).

Discussion

The PCAs (Figure 3) suggest that in both species initial differences within and between nodulated and lamina tissues gradually increase with age. In A. crenata this effect subsides at a certain age until a metabolic equilibrium is reached. We also demonstrate that there is a vast difference between metabolite composition of matured nodulated and lamina tissues. Although, both species show a very similar pattern in the trajectories of the developmental stages the differences between tissues are stronger in A. crenata (Figure 3B) compared to P. punctata (Figure 3C).

Within the hierarchical bicluster analyses (Figures 4, 5) of statistically significant m/z features a similar pattern was observed. The findings further highlight the divergence of metabolic composition of different tissues through increasing tissue maturity. Additionally, we clearly illustrate that bacteria that colonize leaf galls profoundly alter the overall metabolic signature of the host plant in individual ways. This will likely hold true for phylogenetically diverse host species and underpins the individuality and diversity of functions of different leaf nodule symbioses (Lemaire et al., 2011; Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Sieber et al., 2015; Carlier et al., 2016; Pinto-Carbo et al., 2018; De Meyer et al., 2019).

Metabolites Assigned Putative Symbiotic Functions

Developmental Metabolic Gradients From Leaf to Nodule Tissue

Our findings suggest that the full metabolic capacity of the studied endophytes is only achieved once the colonies within the leaf nodules have fully matured. The overlap of stage II and stage III tissues in A. crenata (Figure 3B) can be explained by a metabolic equilibrium that is maintained within the matured leaves until the onset of senescence.

Similar patterns (Figures 3A–C) in both species investigated suggest that leaf nodule development follows a similar mechanism. The stronger differences between matured nodulated tissues and lamina in A. crenata compared to P. punctata (Figure 3A) could be explained by a later onset of full metabolic activity in A. crenata. Additionally, the production of cyclic-depsipeptides and nodule specific flavonoids only detected in A. crenata contribute to the strong separation.

Novel Putative Cyclic-Depsipeptides Indicate High Biologically Active Compound Diversity in A. crenata Leaf Nodules

Within the nodulated tissues of A. crenatam/z features were annotated as cyclic-depsipeptides (cDPs). These m/z features were highly characteristic for stage II and stage III nodulated tissues (Figure 4D). Three of those have already been characterized and another two have been putatively described as cyclic-depsipeptides (Reher et al., 2018). Here, we managed to identify three putatively novel cyclic-depsipeptides. The increase in relative abundance from stage II to stage III (Figures 4D, 7) suggests that the production of these specialized metabolites is still ongoing while some of the endophytic bacteria are already degrading.

No such m/z features were detected within samples of P. punctata, which is in line with no such observations in Ca. C. kirkii (Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Carlier et al., 2013). This could suggest that the common ancestor of both endophytes had the capabilities for production of these non-ribosomal peptides. Subsequently, the descendants of the lineage that later engaged in symbiosis with Psychotria lost it before or during the symbiosis. Alternatively, the descendants of the lineage that later engaged in symbiosis with Ardisia acquired the means of producing these compounds before reaching the obligate form of symbiosis. While the first hypothesis remains speculative, the later can be inferred by the detection of FR900359 within other nodulated Ardisia species (Reher et al., 2018). MS3 spectra (Supplementary Data Sheet 1) suggest that at least two of the three novel putative cyclic-depsipeptides are direct derivatives of FR900359. These findings indicate that there might be even more substrate and/or substrate sequence variability within the non-ribosomal peptide synthethases (NRPS) of the A. crenata endophyte. Alternatively, thus far unknown pathways may exist that mediate further modification of the non-ribosomal peptide after its synthesis.

Pavettamine–Produced by Bacteria or the Plant Host?

The presence of pavettamine generated our interest. It was found to be highly abundant in the mature tissues of P. punctata (Figure 8) and may likely serve as an herbivore defense agent. It is the causative agent of Gousiekte, a disease of ruminants. The compound has been brought into connection with leaf endophytes in Rubiaceae several times (Verstraete et al., 2011; Van Elst et al., 2013b; Brader et al., 2014) and it has been hypothesized that it is, at least partially, produced by the endophytes (Verstraete et al., 2011; Van Elst et al., 2013b). However, no production of pavettamine under in vitro conditions could be observed by a culturable endosymbiont of a related Rubiaceae species (Van Elst et al., 2013b). Evidence of production of other hydroxylated polyamines has been reported for Betaproteobacteria, the same order as the endophytes (Busse and Auling, 1988). Here we show that pavettamine production is strongly dependent on the developmental stage. Our results further illustrate that pavettamine production is highly species-specific. Van Elst et al. (2013a) reported the highest pavettamine concentration within the youngest leaves of a related Rubiaceae species. Our results highlight an inverse signature within P. punctata. Pavettamine likely diffuses through the leaf lamina or might even be transported. Considering the reports of Busse and Auling (1988), Van Elst et al. (2013a), Van Elst et al. (2013b) we suggest that pavettamine is produced by the nodulating bacteria in association with the host plant.

Metabolites Involved in Host-Microbe-Homeostasis

Maltose May be Central to Carbohydrate Storage in Endophytes

The low relative abundances within the lamina tissues of trehalose and maltose (Figures 7, 8) could either be due to high transport rates of carbohydrates into the nodulated tissues, or because of synthesis within the nodules. Genomic analysis from Ca. C. crenata and proteomic analysis of Ca. C. kirkii both report an alpha-alpha-trehalose-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (Carlier et al., 2013; Carlier et al., 2016). The latter also found putative glucose/maltose and trehalose transporters. These findings suggest that the endophytic bacteria are capable of trehalose synthesis. Trehalose has been shown to be important in bacterial stress responses. It can stabilize protein structures through its osmoregulatory function (Ruhal et al., 2013). This coincides with the proposed high oxidative stress encountered by the endophytes within the leaf (Bringel and Couée, 2015).

Since proteomic analysis of Ca. C. kirkii (Carlier et al., 2013) found no evidence for a functioning class II fructose bisphosphate aldolase, preventing functional glycolysis, the increased relative abundances of maltose could suggest that it is utilized within the pentose phosphate pathway as an energy source. To be utilized it would need to be converted into glucose by action of a 4-alpha-glucanotransferase. Maltose could also act as a direct precursor for trehalose synthesis, which requires the action of a trehalose synthase. Evidence for both a 4-alpha-glucanotransferase and trehalose synthase were found within proteomic analysis of Ca. C. kirkii (Carlier et al., 2013). Maltose could further act as a carbohydrate storage for times of famine (Jones et al., 2008). Our results highlight that trehalose and maltose both act as key components of the endophytes carbohydrate metabolism. Evidence for maltodextrin synthesis pathways were found (Carlier et al., 2013), which suggests that these sugars serve as important carbohydrate storage.

Elevated levels of glucose (Figures 7, 8), fructose, galactose, and sucrose (data not shown) within the lamina tissues are likely a product of carbon assimilation during photosynthesis by the host plants (Halford et al., 2011).

Variable Organic Acid Distributions Indicate Differential Regulation of Tricarboxylic Acid Energy Metabolism

Organic dicarboxylic acids have been proposed as the major energy source provided by the host plant to the bacterial endophytes (Carlier et al., 2013). Therefore, we investigated their tissue-dependent distribution carefully. Metabolic signatures of TCA intermediates not only highlight the elevated TCA activity of still developing tissues (Figures 7, 8) but also suggest that C4-dicarboxylic acids may indeed act as a major carbon source for Ca. C. crenata (Figure 7), at least during leaf growth and development. Unfortunately, information regarding relative abundances of TCA cycle intermediates within bacteria remains sparse. We therefore cannot conclude whether the observed pattern is evidence that citric acid is provided to the endophytes or if this is just indicative of high TCA cycle activity. Altogether, it is not clear which dicarboxylic acid acts as carbon source for the endophytes, therefore this needs to be further investigated.

Leucine Supply to Endophytes May Constitute Nitrogen Source but May Also Exert Plant-Controlled Population Constraint

It has been reported that BCAAs are essential for the symbiosis between plant and bacteria in legumes (Prell et al., 2009). Endophytes within root nodules become auxotrophic to BCAAs. This mechanism allows the plant to control the development and persistence of the symbiotic bacteria by provision of these metabolites. Recent evidence suggests that the here studied leaf nodule symbionts developed an auxotrophy for leucine (Carlier et al., 2013; Carlier et al., 2016). Interestingly, leucine and other BCAAs are quite abundant in colonized tissues (Figures 7, 8). We propose that leucine is supplied to the endophytic bacteria by the plant and subsequently imported by action of a putative LIV-I BCAA transport system, which is encoded by genes BKIR_c26_5785 to BKIR_c26_5788 (Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Carlier et al., 2013). Consequently, a similar control mechanism, as found within root nodules of legumes, may also be employed to control bacterial populations in leaf nodule symbioses.

The observed amino acid compositions also illustrated that other amino acids accumulate in nodule tissue (Figures 4A, 5A, 7, 8). Whether this accumulation stems from de novo synthesis in the bacteria or whether AAs other than leucine are being imported needs further investigation. Evidence, however, suggests, that the bacteria are independent of nitrogen sources other than leucine, proline (Ca. C. crenata) (Carlier et al., 2016), methionine (Ca. C. kirkii) (Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Carlier et al., 2013) and ammonia. Typically, altered nitrogen assimilation processes result in highly significant metabolic signatures with decreased central metabolites such as sugars and organic acids and increased levels of nitrogen rich amino acids such as asparagine, glutamine, polyamines, but also glutamate, urea and others (Scherling et al., 2009; Scherling et al., 2010). In a previous study we analyzed metabolomic changes due to the interaction of a bacterial poplar endophyte with the plant in sterilized plant cuttings (Scherling et al., 2009) revealing a highly specific metabolic signature of the plant-microbe interaction pointing to an altered nitrogen metabolism. Results in the present studied leaf nodule interaction suggest drastically altered nitrogen assimilation/dissimilation processes in the nodules compared to the lamina tissue (Figures 7, 8). The origin of these metabolic signatures is not entirely clear and will be subject to further investigations.

Reactive Oxygen Species Detoxification and Osmotic Stress Tolerance Pathways are Heavily Affected by Leaf Nodulation

Given the hostile environment for the bacteria within the leaf (Triantaphylides et al., 2008) an effective detoxification mechanism regarding reactive oxygen species (ROS) seems to be of utmost importance to the bacteria (Alquéres et al., 2013). We observed high amounts of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and ophthalmic acid within the nodulated tissues relative to the non-nodulated lamina tissues in all developmental stages (Figures 7, 8). This indicates that the bacteria actually do experience oxidative stress (Farr and Kogoma, 1991; Narainsamy et al., 2016).

The relative abundances of ascorbic acid (AsA) and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) as key components of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle support these findings (Noctor and Foyer, 1998). Especially within the young tissues ascorbic acid levels were high within the laminar tissues but depleted within the nodulated tissues. The observed pattern was inverted for DHA. This indicates high turnover of GSSG to glutathione (GSH) via the oxidation of AsA to DHA.

Enrichment of putrescine and spermidine within nodulated tissues of both species (Figures 7, 8) may further contribute toward oxidative stress resistance (Tkachenko et al., 2012).

NAD+ was found in higher amounts within the nodulated tissues compared to the lamina tissues. Given the involvement of NAD+ in many different metabolic pathways this can however not be fully attributed to effects based on oxidative stress alone (Belenky et al., 2007).

This metabolic pattern is mostly consistent between A. crenata and P. punctata. There are, however, some noteworthy differences. Whereas in A. crenata GSH levels are higher within the nodulated tissues compared to the lamina tissues (Figure 7), in P. punctata this pattern is reversed (Figure 8). There is also a dramatic difference when comparing the GSH/GSSG ratios of nodulated tissues between the two species. While in A. crenata GSH levels are 1–2 orders of magnitude higher the ratio is around 1 in P. punctata. Altogether, this could indicate that the amount of oxidative stress experienced by endophytes of P. punctata might be higher compared to the endophytes of A. crenata. Genomic analysis from Ca. C. crenata and proteomic analysis of Ca. C. kirkii report both a GSH synthetase and Glu synthase, as well as a glutamate-cystein ligase (Carlier et al., 2013; Carlier et al., 2016). This suggests that GSH, at least in part, is produced by the endophytic bacteria.

Endophytes Delay Senescence of Surrounding Tissue—Self- or Host-Interest?

While auxins could not be detected, the cytokinin derivative zeatin glucoside was found at higher relative abundance in nodulated tissues of both plant species (Figures 7, 8). The role of cytokinins like zeatin has been well documented. They can function as major regulators of plant tissue development. They are involved in processes like meristem formation and maintenance as well as leaf senescence (Gan and Amasino, 1995; Su et al., 2011). In our study we also detected adenosine and adenosine monophosphate with increased relative abundances in the nodulated tissues of both species (Figures 7, 8). These compounds, educts for cytokinin biosynthesis, can be transformed via action of various enzymes including an adenosine phosphate isopentenyl transferase (Hwang and Sakakibara, 2006). Genomic analysis of Ca. C. crenata reports both an isopentenyl transferase and a cytokinin-β-glucosidase, while proteomic and genomic analyses of Ca. C. kirkii found no evidence for cytokinin biosynthesis (Carlier and Eberl, 2012; Carlier et al., 2013; Carlier et al., 2016). This result can be attributed to multiple metabolic mechanisms. It is either a (residual) plant derived defense response or the bacteria are actively producing this compound to influence the plants hormonal system. This could proceed via direct cytokinin production or control of the cytokinin pools within the tissues due to zeatin glycosylation/deglycosylation (Costacurta and Vanderleyden, 1995). The elevated adenosine and adenosine monophosphate levels within nodulated tissues, together with the findings of (Carlier et al., 2016), point towards cytokinin production by the endophytes, at least in A. crenata. Alteration of the plants phytohormone balance by the endophytes could explain the crippled growth of endophyte free plants (Yamada, 1955; Gordon, 1963). In P. punctata, however, it is unlikely that the endophyte produces the cytokinin as it lacks the genomic repertoire (Carlier and Eberl, 2012). Nevertheless, there is a strong senescence delay in P. punctata: the nodules stay green even when the rest of the leaf turns yellow (Figure 9). The photosynthetic activity is retained around nodule tissue, even when the leaf lamina is no more photosynthetically active (Figure 9). The presence of zeatin could explain why nodules of P. punctata retain their chlorophyll during leaf senescence (Rushing, 1990). Yet, there are other mechanisms that could cause this distinctive phenotype. Polyamines (PA), like putrescine and spermidine are involved in senescent mechanisms either through the competition of PAs with ethylene for their common substrate S-adenosylmethionine (Walden et al., 1997) or by inhibition of RNAse and protease activities (Kaur-Sawhney et al., 1982). Thus, elevated levels of polyamines (putrescine and spermidine) in leaf nodules could be involved in delay of senescence. However, PAs are also involved in other physiological and developmental processes, like cell division or root development and it is not fully understood, whether increase of PAs is a cause or a consequence of delayed senescence (Evans and Malmberg, 1989). The linkage of nitrogen metabolism in leaf nodules and photosynthesis is subject to future investigations.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Senescent leaves of Psychotria punctata show green nodules and higher photosynthetic activity in nodulated areas as compared to areas of leaf lamina. (A) Senescent leaf of P. punctata, showing still green nodules. (B) Visualisation of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of a senescent leaf of P. punctata analysed with an Imaging PAM mini fluorometer (Walz, Germany), maximal fluorescence in light adapted state (Fm’); red colour code indicates lower levels of fluorescence light in nodulated areas (marked by green arrow) and thus higher photosynthesis rates; circels indicate the area, where the light curves have been measured. Circle number 1 indicates non nodulated leaf area, numbers 2–5 nodulated leaf areas. (C) Picture of the corresponding senescent leaf of P. punctata. Black circles surround leaf nodules, D, diameter of leaf nodule; C, circumference; A, area. (D) Quantum yield of photosystem II during illumination (Y(II)); green colour code indicates higher quantum yield in nodulated leaf areas (red arrow).

Unique Flavonoid Composition Underpins Symbioses Individuality

A. crenata and P. punctata show completely different flavonoid signatures (Figures 4B, 5B). Flavonoids are well known for their antioxidative properties and their participation in plant bacteria communications. Flavonoids have also been reported as being part of plant defense responses towards infection (Koes et al., 1994; Rice-Evans et al., 1996; Samanta et al., 2011). Given the close phylogenetic relationship of the two endophytes some convergence in flavonoid composition could be expected. Accordingly the specific flavonoid compositions might rather result from the host specificity (Liu and Murray, 2016). The flavonoid composition in colonized tissue of A. crenata indicated that flavonoids might play a specific role in this species’ leaf nodule symbiosis (Figures 4B, 7). These flavonoids could be part of plant-bacteria signaling pathways or could act as antioxidants further protecting the bacteria from harmful ROS (Mierziak et al., 2014). The increased amount of redox active flavonoids within nodulated tissues of A. crenata might also explain the reversed GSH pattern in A. crenata (Figure 7) compared to P. punctata (Figure 8). The flavonoids may contribute to detoxify ROS and thereby take pressure off the GSH available to the bacteria. A significant difference in A. crenata compared to P. punctata is an epicatechin derivative which we have structurally elucidated (Figure 6A). The modification of this in A. crenata, to our knowledge not yet described epicatechin derivative consists of a 3-hydroxy-2-methyl propionate-group (Figure 6A). The (R) enantiomeric form of this group is involved in the degradation pathway of valine (Letto et al., 1986). The derivatization could facilitate the transport of this metabolite. However, the exact R/L configuration needs to be been determined.

Bacterial cell wall composition could play an important role in host-microbe-specificity but AhMP modification could also expand the cytotoxic repertoire of leaf symbionts

In our quest to discover common nodule specific elements shared by the two symbioses we identified a broad range of AhMPs. First, our findings confirm that the peptidoglycan of both Ca. C. crenata and Ca. C. kirkii is composed of N-acetylglucosaminyl-N-acetylmuramoylalanyl-d-glutamyl-2,6-diaminopimelate-d-alanyl-d-alanine units, as suggested by analyses of Ca. C. crenata and Ca. C. kirkii, which both contain a UDP-N-acetylmuramoylalanyl-d-glutamyl-2,6- diaminopimelate-d-alanyl-d-alanine ligase. While this finding alone might not be surprising for gram-negative bacteria the diversity of related degradation products within the analyzed tissues is. Genomic analysis of Ca. C. crenata (Carlier et al., 2016) report both nagZ1 and nagZ2 β-hexosaminidases, which are involved in peptidoglycan recycling. An anhydromuropeptide permease AmpG or 1,6-anhydro-N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine amidase AmpD were only reported in Ca. C. kirkii (Carlier et al., 2013). Our findings suggest that the peptidoglycan recycling pathway within the leaf nodule symbiosis either is broken or downregulated. This leads to a vast production of peptidoglycan degradation products in nodules. Lower relative abundances of these metabolites were also detected within the surrounding lamina tissues. Whether the AhMPs reach the laminar tissues by diffusion or are actively transported remains unclear and requires further investigation.

Cytotoxic activity has been reported for the AhMP tracheal cytotoxin (Tat-BP) (Cookson et al., 1989), which was also detected within our samples. Muropeptides have been reported to be involved in symbiotic associations, bacterial communication and pathogenesis in animals and plants. Their presence can also initiate an immune response in eukaryotes (Irazoki et al., 2019; Jõers et al., 2019). It has been reported that bacteria can evade peptidoglycan recognition by altering either glycosidic parts or stem peptides by various means. We detected native anhydromuropeptides, as well as diaminopimelic acid amidated and N-acetylated diaminopimelic acid amide anhydromuropeptides. This could result from mechanisms by which the bacteria try to alter their peptidoglycans to avoid triggering an immune response in the host (Yadav et al., 2018). It could however also be a post degradational modification of the anhydromuropeptides to alter their cytotoxicity. Their dynamic remodeling with age (Figures 7, 8) further supports the hypothesis that these compounds are not merely peptidoglycan degradation products but might act as molecular signals within this symbiosis.

Conclusion

The leaf nodule symbiosis constitutes one of the most intimate kinds of plant bacteria associations known to date. Here we applied, for the first time, a holistic metabolomics-based approach to study the obligate interaction in the two phylogenetically diverse plant species Ardisia crenata and Psychotria punctata. We investigated our dataset in two respects.

We first took a look at metabolites assigned a putative symbiotic function. Generally, we could show that the leaf nodule metabolite composition follows an age dependent developmental gradient and that metabolites assigned a symbiotic function increase with leaf maturity. We identified putatively novel cyclic-depsipeptides in A. crenata, which indicates that the biologically active compound diversity in leaf nodules is even higher than previously thought. We also found pavettamine in tissues of P. punctata. We could show that the abundance of pavettamine in leaves depends on the developmental stage and is highly species-specific across Rubiaceae, which produce this polyamine.

Metabolites involved in host-microbe-homeostasis were also analysed by means of differential abundance analysis in different tissues. We found that maltose may act as central carbohydrate storage precursor in endophytes. After hypothesizing about other carbon sources supplied to the bacteria we focused on C4-dicarboxylic acids. Variable organic acid distributions indicated that regulation of the TCA energy metabolism is differentially regulated in the two endophytes. Nevertheless, we conclude that citric acid plays a crucial role in the development of both endophytes.

In terms of energy, carbon and nitrogen source supplied to the endophytes we propose that leucine or other amino acids may constitute this source but that it may also be used by the plant to control the bacterial population. A local protective mechanism for photosynthesis by leaf nodulation is observed in senescent leafs which needs further investigations.

Last, we would like to highlight the importance of bacterial cell wall composition, which could play an important role in host-microbe-specificity. AhMP modification could also expand the cytotoxic repertoire of leaf symbionts and contribute to their function as plant defense agents.

Finally, our comparative metabolomic analysis of leaf nodule and lamina tissues in A. crenata and P. punctata revealed important novel aspects of the interaction between the host and its bacterium and provided insights into this mutualistic relationship. The metabolomics data provide a first reference platform for further investigations of this highly interesting symbiotic relationship and potential resource of novel natural products.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members of MOSYS for their support and the University of Vienna for funding the project. Thankfully acknowledged is the hard work of our gardeners, Andreas Schröfl and Thomas Joch. We thank Gert Bachmann for valuable discussion and support with analyses of Imaging PAM data.

Data Availability Statement

Metabolomics data have been deposited to the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database (DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1019, PMID:31691833) with the identifier MTBLS2870 (Haug et al., 2019). The complete dataset can be accessed here https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/MTBLS2870.

Author Contributions

WW conceived the study. FS and LF designed and performed the experiments. FS analyzed the LC-MS data and LF analyzed GC-MS data. FS performed statistical analysis. ABer, MB, ST, WL, XS, JS, LB helped with species description, LC-MS analysis, natural product enrichment and NMR analysis. ABel and FS performed SEM analysis. All authors provided data and analyzed data. FS, JH, LF, and WW drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.683671/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Alquéres S., Meneses C., Rouws L., Rothballer M., Baldani I., Schmid M., et al. (2013). The Bacterial Superoxide Dismutase and Glutathione Reductase are Crucial for Endophytic Colonization of Rice Roots by Gluconacetobacter Diazotrophicus PAL5. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 26, 937–945. 10.1094/mpmi-12-12-0286-r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atanasov A. G., Zotchev S. B., Zotchev S. B., Dirsch V. M., Supuran C. T., Rollinger J. M., et al. (2021). Natural Products in Drug Discovery: Advances and Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 200–216. 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belenky P., Bogan K. L., Brenner C. (2007). NAD+ Metabolism in Health and Disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 12–19. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger A., Tanuhadi E., Brecker L., Schinnerl J., Valant-Vetschera K. (2017). Chemodiversity of Tryptamine-Derived Alkaloids in Six Costa Rican Palicourea Species (Rubiaceae-Palicoureeae). Phytochemistry 143, 124–131. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bode M. L., Gates P. J., Gebretnsae S. Y., Vleggaar R. (2010). Structure Elucidation and Stereoselective Total Synthesis of Pavettamine, the Causal Agent of Gousiekte. Tetrahedron 66, 2026–2036. 10.1016/j.tet.2010.01.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brader G., Compant S., Mitter B., Trognitz F., Sessitsch A. (2014). Metabolic Potential of Endophytic Bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 27, 30–37. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bringel F., Couée I. (2015). Pivotal Roles of Phyllosphere Microorganisms at the Interface Between Plant Functioning and Atmospheric Trace Gas Dynamics. Front. Microbiol. 6, 486. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buathong R., Schindler F., Schinnerl J., Valant-Vetschera K., Bacher M., Potthast A., et al. (2019). Uncommon Fatty Acids, Iridoids and Other Secondary Metabolites from the Medicinal Plant Species Ixora cibdela Craib (Rubiaceae). Phytochem. Lett. 33, 77–80. 10.1016/j.phytol.2019.07.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Busse J., Auling G. (1988). Polyamine Pattern as a Chemotaxonomic Marker within the Proteobacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 11, 1–8. 10.1016/s0723-2020(88)80040-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Calixto N. O., Pinto M. E. F., Ramalho S. D., Burger M. C. M., Bobey A. F., Young M. C. M., et al. (2016). The Genus Psychotria: Phytochemistry, Chemotaxonomy, Ethnopharmacology and Biological Properties. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 27. 10.5935/0103-5053.20160149 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlier A., Fehr L., Pinto-Carbó M., Schäberle T., Reher R., Dessein S., et al. (2016). The Genome Analysis of C Andidatus Burkholderia Crenata Reveals that Secondary Metabolism May be a Key Function of the A Rdisia Crenata Leaf Nodule Symbiosis. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2507–2522. 10.1111/1462-2920.13184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlier A. L., Eberl L. (2012). The Eroded Genome of aPsychotrialeaf Symbiont: Hypotheses About Lifestyle and Interactions with its Plant Host. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 2757–2769. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02763.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlier A. L., Omasits U., Ahrens C. H., Eberl L. (2013). Proteomics Analysis of Psychotria Leaf Nodule Symbiosis: Improved Genome Annotation and Metabolic Predictions. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 26, 1325–1333. 10.1094/mpmi-05-13-0152-r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cattell R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behav. Res. 1, 245–276. 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Challinor V. L., Bode H. B. (2015). Bioactive Natural Products from Novel Microbial Sources. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1354, 82–97. 10.1111/nyas.12954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cookson B. T., Cho H. L., Herwaldt L. A., Goldman W. E. (1989). Biological Activities and Chemical Composition of Purified Tracheal Cytotoxin of Bordetella pertussis . Infect. Immun. 57, 2223–2229. 10.1128/iai.57.7.2223-2229.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Costacurta A., Vanderleyden J. (1995). Synthesis of Phytohormones by Plant-Associated Bacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 1–18. 10.3109/10408419509113531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Crüsemann M., Reher R., Schamari I., Brachmann A. O., Ohbayashi T., Kuschak M., et al. (2018). Heterologous Expression, Biosynthetic Studies, and Ecological Function of the Selective Gq‐Signaling Inhibitor FR900359. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 836–840. 10.1002/anie.201707996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis A. L., Cai Y., Davies A. P., Lewis J. R. (1996). 1H and13C NMR Assignments of Some Green Tea Polyphenols. Magn. Reson. Chem. 34, 887–890. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Meyer F., Danneels B., Acar T., Rasolomampianina R., Rajaonah M. T., Jeannoda V., et al. (2019). Adaptations and Evolution of a Heritable Leaf Nodule Symbiosis between Dioscorea Sansibarensis and Orrella Dioscoreae. ISME J. 13, 1831. 10.1038/s41396-019-0398-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dettmer K., Nürnberger N., Kaspar H., Gruber M. A., Almstetter M. F., Oefner P. J. (2011). Metabolite Extraction from Adherently Growing Mammalian Cells for Metabolomics Studies: Optimization of Harvesting and Extraction Protocols. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 399, 1127–1139. 10.1007/s00216-010-4425-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Doerfler H., Lyon D., Nägele T., Sun X., Fragner L., Hadacek F., et al. (2013). Granger Causality in Integrated GC-MS and LC-MS Metabolomics Data Reveals the Interface of Primary and Secondary Metabolism. Metabolomics 9, 564–574. 10.1007/s11306-012-0470-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Razek M. A. (2007). NMR Assignments of Four Catechin Epimers. Asian J. Chem. 19, 4867. [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans P. T., Malmberg R. (1989). Do Polyamines Have Roles in Plant Development? Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 235–269. 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.001315 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Farr S. B., Kogoma T. (1991). Oxidative Stress Responses in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium . Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 55, 561–585. 10.1128/mmbr.55.4.561-585.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox J., Weisberg S., Adler D., Bates D., Baud-Bovy G., Ellison S., et al. (2012). Package ‘car’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  27. Galili T., O’Callaghan A., Sidi J., Sievert C. (2018). Heatmaply: an R Package for Creating Interactive Cluster Heatmaps for Online Publishing. Bioinformatics 34, 1600–1602. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gan S., Amasino R. M. (1995). Inhibition of Leaf Senescence by Autoregulated Production of Cytokinin. Science 270, 1986–1988. 10.1126/science.270.5244.1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomelsky M. (2011). cAMP, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and Now cGMP: Bacteria Use Them All!. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 562–565. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07514.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodacre R., Broadhurst D., Smilde A. K., Kristal B. S., Baker J. D., Beger R., et al. (2007). Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Data Analysis in Metabolomics. Metabolomics 3, 231–241. 10.1007/s11306-007-0081-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gordon J. F. (1963). The Nature and Distribution within the Plant of the Bacteria Associated with Certain Leaf-Nodulated Species of the Families Myrsinaceae and Rubiaceae. [Google Scholar]
  32. Graves S., Piepho H.-P., Selzer M. L. (2015). Package ‘multcompView’. Visualizations Of Paired Comparisons. [Google Scholar]
  33. Halford N. G., Curtis T. Y., Muttucumaru N., Postles J., Mottram D. S. (2011). Sugars in Crop Plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 158, 1–25. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00443.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Haug K., Cochrane K., Nainala V. C., Williams M., Chang J., Jayaseelan K. V., et al. (2019). MetaboLights: A Resource Evolving in Response to the Needs of its Scientific Community. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D440–D444. 10.1093/nar/gkz1019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hermes C., Richarz R., Wirtz D. A., Patt J., Hanke W., Kehraus S., et al. (2021). Thioesterase-Mediated Side Chain Transesterification Generates Potent Gq Signaling Inhibitor FR900359. Nat. Commun. 12, 144. 10.1038/s41467-020-20418-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Herpell J. B., Schindler F., Bejtović M., Fragner L., Diallo B., Bellaire A., et al. (2020). The Potato Yam Phyllosphere Ectosymbiont Paraburkholderia sp. Msb3 is a Potent Growth Promotor in Tomato. Front. Microbiol. 11, 581. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. HighChem (2019). mzCloud Advanced Mass Spectral Database. [Google Scholar]
  38. Horai H., Arita M., Kanaya S., Nihei Y., Ikeda T., Suwa K., et al. (2010). MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences. J. Mass. Spectrom. 45, 703–714. 10.1002/jms.1777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Horner H. T., Jr, Lersten N. R. (1972). Nomenclature of Bacteria in Leaf Nodules of the Families Myrsinaceae and Rubiaceae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 22, 117–122. 10.1099/00207713-22-2-117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hwang I., Sakakibara H. (2006). Cytokinin Biosynthesis and Perception. Physiol. Plant. 126, 528–538. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00665.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Irazoki O., Hernandez S. B., Cava F. (2019). Peptidoglycan Muropeptides: Release, Perception, and Functions as Signaling Molecules. Front. Microbiol. 10, 500. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jõers A., Vind K., Hernández S. B., Maruste R., Pereira M., Brauer A., et al. (2019). Muropeptides Stimulate Growth Resumption from Stationary Phase in Escherichia coli . Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10. 10.1038/s41598-019-54646-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jones S. A., Jorgensen M., Chowdhury F. Z., Rodgers R., Hartline J., Leatham M. P., et al. (2008). Glycogen and Maltose Utilization by Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the Mouse Intestine. Infect. Immun. 76, 2531–2540. 10.1128/iai.00096-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Karplus M. (1959). Contact Electron‐Spin Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments. J. Chem. Phys. 30, 11–15. 10.1063/1.1729860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kassambara A., Mundt F. (2017). Package ‘factoextra’. Extract And Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses 76. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kaur-Sawhney R., Shih L.-M., Cegielska T., Galston A. W. (1982). Inhibition of Protease Activity by Polyamines. FEBS Lett. 145, 345–349. 10.1016/0014-5793(82)80197-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kitajima K., Fox A. M., Sato T., Nagamatsu D. (2006). Cultivar Selection Prior to Introduction May Increase Invasiveness: Evidence from Ardisia Crenata. Biol. Invasions 8, 1471–1482. 10.1007/s10530-005-5839-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kobayashi H., de Mejía E. (2005). The Genus Ardisia: a Novel Source of Health-Promoting Compounds and Phytopharmaceuticals. J. Ethnopharmacol. 96, 347–354. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Koes R. E., Quattrocchio F., Mol J. N. M. (1994). The Flavonoid Biosynthetic Pathway in Plants: Function and Evolution. BioEssays 16, 123–132. 10.1002/bies.950160209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kruskal W. H., Wallis W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621. 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lachenaud O. (2019). Revision of the Genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae) in West and Central Africa: Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee M., Dhar S., De Benedetti S., Hesek D., Boggess B., Blázquez B., et al. (2016). Muropeptides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Their Role as Elicitors of β‐Lactam‐Antibiotic Resistance. Angew. Chem. 128, 6996–7000. 10.1002/ange.201601693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lemaire B., Lachenaud O., Persson C., Smets E., Dessein S. (2012). Screening for Leaf-Associated Endophytes in the Genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 364–372. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01356.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lemaire B., Vandamme P., Merckx V., Smets E., Dessein S. (2011). Bacterial Leaf Symbiosis in Angiosperms: Host Specificity Without Co-Speciation. PLoS One 6, e24430. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Letto J., Brosnan M. E., Brosnan J. T. (1986). Valine Metabolism Gluconeogenesis from 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate. Biochem. J. 240, 909–912. 10.1042/bj2400909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Levene H. (1961). “Robust Tests for equality of Variances,” in Contributions to Probability and Statistics Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. 279–292. [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu C.-W., Murray J. (2016). The Role of Flavonoids in Nodulation Host-Range Specificity: An Update. Plants 5, 33. 10.3390/plants5030033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lopes-Santos L., Castro D. B. A., Ferreira-Tonin M., Corrêa D. B. A., Weir B. S., Park D., et al. (2017). Reassessment of the Taxonomic Position of Burkholderia Andropogonis and Description of Robbsia Andropogonis gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110, 727–736. 10.1007/s10482-017-0842-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ludwig-Müller J. (2015). Plants and Endophytes: Equal Partners in Secondary Metabolite Production? Biotechnol. Lett. 37, 1325–1334. 10.1007/s10529-015-1814-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mari A., Lyon D., Fragner L., Montoro P., Piacente S., Wienkoop S., et al. (2013). Phytochemical Composition of Potentilla anserina L. Analyzed by an Integrative GC-MS and LC-MS Metabolomics Platform. Metabolomics 9, 599–607. 10.1007/s11306-012-0473-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mathesius U. (2018). Flavonoid Functions in Plants and Their Interactions with Other Organisms. Plants 7, 30. 10.3390/plants7020030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mierziak J., Kostyn K., Kulma A. (2014). Flavonoids as Important Molecules of Plant Interactions with the Environment. Molecules 19, 16240–16265. 10.3390/molecules191016240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Mikaia A., Ei P. E. W. V., Ei V. Z., Ei D. Z., Ei O. D. S., Neta P., et al. (2014). NIST Standard Reference Database 1A. [Google Scholar]
  64. Moe L. A. (2013). Amino Acids in the Rhizosphere: from Plants to Microbes. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1692–1705. 10.3732/ajb.1300033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nägele T., Mair A., Sun X., Fragner L., Teige M., Weckwerth W. (2014). Solving the Differential Biochemical Jacobian from Metabolomics Covariance Data. PLoS One 9, e92299. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Narainsamy K., Farci S., Braun E., Junot C., Cassier-Chauvat C., Chauvat F. (2016). Oxidative-stress Detoxification and Signalling in Cyanobacteria: the Crucial Glutathione Synthesis Pathway Supports the Production of Ergothioneine and Ophthalmate. Mol. Microbiol. 100, 15–24. 10.1111/mmi.13296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Noctor G., Foyer C. H. (1998). Ascorbate and Glutathione: Keeping Active Oxygen under Control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 249–279. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Packiam M., Weinrick B., Jacobs W. R., Maurelli A. T. (2015). Structural Characterization of Muropeptides fromChlamydia Trachomatispeptidoglycan by Mass Spectrometry Resolves “Chlamydial Anomaly”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11660–11665. 10.1073/pnas.1514026112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pinto-Carbó M., Gademann K., Eberl L., Carlier A. (2018). Leaf Nodule Symbiosis: Function and Transmission of Obligate Bacterial Endophytes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 44, 23–31. 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pinto-Carbó M., Gademann K., Eberl L., Carlier A. (2018). Leaf Nodule Symbiosis: Function and Transmission of Obligate Bacterial Endophytes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 44, 23–31. 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Prell J., White J. P., Bourdes A., Bunnewell S., Bongaerts R. J., Poole P. S. (2009). Legumes Regulate Rhizobium Bacteroid Development and Persistence by the Supply of Branched-Chain Amino Acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 12477–12482. 10.1073/pnas.0903653106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Reher R., Kuschak M., Heycke N., Annala S., Kehraus S., Dai H.-F., et al. (2018). Applying Molecular Networking for the Detection of Natural Sources and Analogues of the Selective Gq Protein Inhibitor FR900359. J. Nat. Prod. 81, 1628–1635. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rice-Evans C. A., Miller N. J., Paganga G. (1996). Structure-Antioxidant Activity Relationships of Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 20, 933–956. 10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ruhal R., Kataria R., Choudhury B. (2013). Trends in Bacterial Trehalose Metabolism and Significant Nodes of Metabolic Pathway in the Direction of Trehalose Accumulation. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 493–502. 10.1111/1751-7915.12029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rushing J. W. (1990). Cytokinins Affect Respiration, Ethylene Production, and Chlorophyll Retention of Packaged Broccoli Florets. HortSci 25, 88–90. 10.21273/hortsci.25.1.88 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Samanta A., Das G., Das S. K. (2011). Roles of Flavonoids in Plants. Carbon 100, 12–35. [Google Scholar]
  77. Scherling C., Roscher C., Giavalisco P., Schulze E.-D., Weckwerth W. (2010). Metabolomics Unravel Contrasting Effects of Biodiversity on the Performance of Individual Plant Species. PLoS One 5, e12569. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Scherling C., Ulrich K., Ewald D., Weckwerth W. (2009). A Metabolic Signature of the Beneficial Interaction of the Endophyte Paenibacillus sp. Isolate and In Vitro-Grown Poplar Plants Revealed by Metabolomics. Mol. Plant. Microb. Intract. 22, 1032–1037. 10.1094/mpmi-22-8-1032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schrage R., Schmitz A. L., Gaffal E., Annala S., Kehraus S., Wenzel D., et al. (2015). The Experimental Power of FR900359 to Study Gq-Regulated Biological Processes. Nat. Commun. 6, 10156. 10.1038/ncomms10156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Seidel V. (2012). Initial and Bulk Extraction of Natural Products Isolation. Methods Mol. Biol. 864, 27–41. 10.1007/978-1-61779-624-1_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shapiro S. S., Wilk M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611. 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sieber S., Carlier A., Neuburger M., Grabenweger G., Eberl L., Gademann K. (2015). Isolation and Total Synthesis of Kirkamide, an Aminocyclitol from an Obligate Leaf Nodule Symbiont. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7968–7970. 10.1002/anie.201502696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Su Y.-H., Liu Y.-B., Zhang X.-S. (2011). Auxin-Cytokinin Interaction Regulates Meristem Development. Mol. Plant 4, 616–625. 10.1093/mp/ssr007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sumner L. W., Amberg A., Barrett D., Beale M. H., Beger R., Daykin C. A., et al. (2007). Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis. Metabolomics 3, 211–221. 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tang Y., Horikoshi M., Li W. (2016). Ggfortify: Unified Interface to Visualize Statistical Results of Popular R Packages. R. J. 8, 474. 10.32614/rj-2016-060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tkachenko A. G., Akhova A. V., Shumkov M. S., Nesterova L. Y. (2012). Polyamines Reduce Oxidative Stress in Escherichia coli Cells Exposed to Bactericidal Antibiotics. Res. Microbiol. 163, 83–91. 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Triantaphylidès C., Krischke M., Hoeberichts F. A., Ksas B., Gresser G., Havaux M., et al. (2008). Singlet Oxygen Is the Major Reactive Oxygen Species Involved in Photooxidative Damage to Plants. Plant Physiol. 148, 960–968. 10.1104/pp.108.125690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Tukey J. W. (1949). Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance. Biometrics 5, 99–114. 10.2307/3001913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Van Elst D., Nuyens S., Van Wyk B., Verstraete B., Dessein S., Prinsen E. (2013a). Distribution of the Cardiotoxin Pavettamine in the Coffee Family (Rubiaceae) and its Significance for Gousiekte, a Fatal Poisoning of Ruminants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 67, 15–19. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Van Elst D., Van Wyk B., Schultz A., Prinsen E. (2013b). Production of Toxic Pavettamine and Pavettamine Conjugates in the Gousiekte-Causing Fadogia Homblei Plant and its Relation to the Bacterial Endosymbiont. Phytochemistry 85, 92–98. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Verstraete B., Van Elst D., Steyn H., Van Wyk B., Lemaire B., Smets E., et al. (2011). Endophytic Bacteria in Toxic South African Plants: Identification, Phylogeny and Possible Involvement in Gousiekte. PLoS One 6, e19265. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Vinaixa M., Samino S., Saez I., Duran J., Guinovart J. J., Yanes O. (2012). A Guideline to Univariate Statistical Analysis for LC/MS-based Untargeted Metabolomics-Derived Data. Metabolites 2, 775–795. 10.3390/metabo2040775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Walden R., Cordeiro A., Tiburcio A. F. (1997). Polyamines: Small Molecules Triggering Pathways in Plant Growth and Development. Plant Physiol. 113, 1009–1013. 10.1104/pp.113.4.1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wang L., Nägele T., Doerfler H., Fragner L., Chaturvedi P., Nukarinen E., et al. (2016a). System Level Analysis of Cacao Seed Ripening Reveals a Sequential Interplay of Primary and Secondary Metabolism Leading to Polyphenol Accumulation and Preparation of Stress Resistance. Plant J. 87, 318–332. 10.1111/tpj.13201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wang L., Nagele T., Doerfler H., Fragner L., Chaturvedi P., Nukarinen E., et al. (2016b). System Level Analysis of Cacao Seed Ripening Reveals a Sequential Interplay of Primary and Secondary Metabolism Leading to Polyphenol Accumulation and Preparation of Stress Resistance. Plant J. 87, 318. 10.1111/tpj.13201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wang L., Sun X., Weiszmann J., Weckwerth W. (2017). System-Level and Granger Network Analysis of Integrated Proteomic and Metabolomic Dynamics Identifies Key Points of Grape Berry Development at the Interface of Primary and Secondary Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1066. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Warnes M. G. R., Bolker B., Bonebakker L., Gentleman R., Huber W. (2016). Package ‘gplots’. Various R Programming Tools For Plotting Data. [Google Scholar]
  98. Weckwerth W. (2011). Unpredictability of Metabolism-The Key Role of Metabolomics Science in Combination with Next-Generation Genome Sequencing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400, 1967–1978. 10.1007/s00216-011-4948-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wickham H., Chang W., Wickham M. H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’. Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics. 1–189. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wong P. L., Ramli N. S., Tan C. P., Azlan A., Abas F. (2020). Metabolomic Analysis Reveals the Valuable Bioactive Compounds of Ardisia Elliptica. Phytochem. Anal., 1–13. 10.1002/pca.3015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Yadav A. K., Espaillat A., Cava F. (2018). Bacterial Strategies to Preserve Cell wall Integrity Against Environmental Threats. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2064. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Yamada T. (1955). Studies on the Leaf Nodules V the Formation of Knobs by the Effect of Antibiotics on the Ardisia crispa and A. punctata . Shokubutsugaku Zasshi 68, 267–273. 10.15281/jplantres1887.68.267 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Yang C.-J., Hu J.-M. (2018). “Bacterial Leaf Nodule Symbiosis in Flowering Plants,” in Symbiosis. IntechOpen. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Metabolomics data have been deposited to the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database (DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1019, PMID:31691833) with the identifier MTBLS2870 (Haug et al., 2019). The complete dataset can be accessed here https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/MTBLS2870.


Articles from Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES