Manganese, the twelfth-most abundant element in the earth’s crust and an essential micronutrient, is not frequently viewed as a major drinking water contaminant. Yet, a quarter of all U.S. groundwater wells surveyed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) between 1991 and 2010 contained manganese at concentrations above the secondary maximum contaminant level (SMCL) of 0.05 mg/L set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).1 Over the same period, 7% of the wells sampled by the USGS had manganese concentrations above the health-based screening level (HBSL) of 0.3 mg/L. In the past decade, there have been recurring reports of manganese contamination in local groundwater supplies around the U.S., frequently at levels approaching or exceeding the HBSL.1 However, because manganese is classified as a secondary contaminant, the SMCL is only an aesthetic guideline, and neither the SMCL nor the HBSL are enforceable standards.2
A growing body of research points to the neurotoxic effects of ingesting excessive manganese in drinking water: chronic overexposure is shown to damage intellectual function and motor skills in young children.3,4 Because these setbacks are not easily reversed, overexposure to manganese poses a significant health threat to children. Although water is the principal route of manganese exposure for pregnant women and young children,5 the EPA does not currently oblige public water systems or private well users, to monitor and report manganese levels. Private wells provide drinking water for approximately 43 million people, which is 15% of the U.S. population. Given the toxicity concerns, the frequent exceedances of advisory limits coupled with potential exposure for a large proportion of the U.S. population, there is reason to believe that manganese may warrant a stricter regulatory standard in the U.S. Manganese is an essential nutrient with a recommended maximum daily intake of 10 mg/day for an adult, with most manganese consumed via diet.6 Concentrations in drinking water need to be monitored in order to prevent excessive manganese intake.
A specific challenge to keeping manganese concentrations at safe levels, particularly in groundwater, is to understand the spatial heterogeneity of geogenic sources of manganese and the processes influencing subsurface geochemistry and manganese oxidation states.7,8 Manganese can be found in a wide range of primary minerals and is generally more abundant in finer fractions of soils and sediments where it is associated with layered silicates and carbonates.9 Weathering of primary minerals releases Mn2+ which undergoes oxidation to form secondary Mn(III/IV) oxides. These secondary Mn(III/IV) oxides can subsequently be reductively dissolved under suboxic or anoxic conditions. Dissolved Mn(II) can then be mobilized through sediment pore-networks and eventually transported into aquifers. Though Mn2+ is the predominant species under low oxygen conditions, it can be readily converted to insoluble Mn(IV) oxides during water treatment via chlorination and removed by filtering. If ingested, Mn(II) can become oxidized to Mn(III) in the body. While both Mn(II) and Mn(III) are biologically relevant species, Mn (III) is more readily transported across membranes and the blood brain barrier.
Mobilization of manganese as Mn(II) into groundwater occurs most readily in shallow groundwaters where subsurface strata possess Mn content, with enough dissolved oxygen to trigger manganese reduction (e.g., Mn(IV) to Mn(II)), while still maintaining a high enough redox status to allow manganese to remain dissolved in well water without precipitating manganese carbonate or other reduced manganese solids. Therefore, under certain conditions, shallow depths can engender well water with significant concentrations of manganese.10 As a consequence, private wells, which are often drilled to shallower depths than public supply wells, may put their users at greater risk of manganese overexposure than users served by public water systems. There are very few studies on the quality of drinking water infrastructure in the U.S. and on the socioeconomic characteristics of the users served by each infrastructure type; however, even assuming that on an average, users of private wells are no poorer than users served by community water systems, private wells users still carry the onus of maintaining their own water quality. Where these users have the resources to test their wells, they might prioritize primary contaminants over manganese. In light of these gaps, regulatory policy ought to consider how best to protect private well users from overexposure to manganese in shallow groundwater.
Drinking water quality monitoring programs instituted in accordance with EPA rules test regularly for arsenic, among other primary contaminants, but not for manganese. Whereas arsenic concentrations are suppressed under oxic and suboxic conditions, manganese concentrations can be poorly correlated with redox potential, with high concentrations found in wells exhibiting oxic conditions.1 As a result, monitoring programs might deem (shallow) wells that meet the arsenic standard as safe for drinking water needs without ever testing and ensuring that the wells also meet the manganese standard. Thus, an unenforced manganese standard could also leave community water system users open to elevated concentrations of manganese.
Although the USGS has analyzed several thousands of domestic well samples between 1991 and 2010, it has usually tested a given domestic or monitoring well only once over this time-span. Ideally, a population’s overexposure to manganese in drinking water is gauged from longitudinal data on manganese exceedances in both private and public water systems. Toward this end, targeted studies of populations who obtain drinking water by tapping groundwater from shallow glacial and sandstone aquifers could prove useful.7
Should further evidence of manganese contamination come to light, and the manganese drinking water standard is made mandatory and enforceable, the good news is that the cost of treating manganese contamination is relatively inexpensive. For private well owners, the application of a number of point-of-use treatment methods that combine oxidation with filtration (e.g., greensands filters, chlorination followed by filtration) can remove dissolved manganese from raw groundwater effectively. For public supplies, manganese can be readily removed through traditional water treatment techniques, for example, chlorination. The availability of cost-effective treatment solutions are helpful insofar as they can be implemented widely and thus, ensure that a stricter manganese standard is attainable universally.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project is supported by funding from NIEHS R21 ES030807-02.
Footnotes
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08065
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Maithili Ramachandran, School of Public Policy, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Kurt A. Schwabe, School of Public Policy, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States; Water Policy Center, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, California, United States
Samantha C. Ying, Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
REFERENCES
- (1).DeSimone LA; McMahon PB; Rosen MR The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters Water: Quality in Principal Aquifers of the United States, 1991–2010, Circular 1360; U.S. Geological Survey, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- (2).U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Secondary Drinking Water Standards: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nuisance-chemicals (accessed 2018/10/15).
- (3).Bjørklund G; Chartrand MS; Aaseth J Manganese Exposure and Neurotoxic Effects in Children. Environ. Res 2017, 155, 380–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Schullehner J; Thygesen M; Munch Kristiansen S; Hansen B; Pedersen Bøcker C; Dalsgaard S Exposure to Manganese in Drinking Water during Childhood and Association with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Environ. Health Perspect 128 (9), 097004. DOI: 10.1289/EHP6391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Lucchini RG; Aschner M; Landrigan PJ; Cranmer JM Neurotoxicity of Manganese: Indications for Future Research and Public Health Intervention from the Manganese 2016 Conference. NeuroToxicology 2018, 64, 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Health Effects Support Document for Manganese.
- (7).Groschen GE; Arnold TL; Morrow WS; Warner KL Occurrence and Distribution of Iron, Manganese, and Selected Trace Elements in Ground Water in the Glacial Aquifer System of the Northern United States; Scientific Investigations Report; USGS Numbered Series; U.S. Geological Survey, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- (8).McMahon PB; Belitz K; Reddy JE; Johnson TD Elevated Manganese Concentrations in United States Groundwater, Role of Land Surface–Soil–Aquifer Connections. Environ. Sci. Technol 2019, 53 (1), 29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Gilkes R; McKenzie R Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Manganese in Soils. Manganese Soils Plants Dev. Plant Soil Sci 1988, 33, 23–35. [Google Scholar]
- (10).Ying SC; Schaefer MV; Cock-Esteb A; Li J; Fendorf S Depth Stratification Leads to Distinct Zones of Manganese and Arsenic Contaminated Groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol 2017, 51 (16), 8926–8932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]