Abstract
Optimization of spray drying conditions namely inlet air temperature (IAT) and maltodextrin (MD) concentration was utilized by response surface methodology for Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.) juice powder (JAJP) manufacture. Drying yield, moisture content, water solubility index (WSI), bulk density, color, pH, total phenol content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), vitamin C content, and DPPH radical-scavenging activity of juice powder were measured. Moisture content, vitamin C content, color, DPPH radical-scavenging activity, pH, and bulk density were greatly influenced by IAT, but drying yield, WSI, TPC, and TFC were only significantly affected by MD concentration. The spray drying condition was optimum at 10% MD concentration and 165.8 °C IAT. The properties of juice powder were 37.50% drying yield, 4.81% moisture content, 134.25 mg/g vitamin C content, 27.52% DPPH radical-scavenging activity, 2.78 pH, 89.15% WSI, 232.856 μg GAE/100 g TPC, 404.66 μg CE/100 g TFC, and 0.49 bulk density.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10068-021-00950-8.
Keywords: Powder property, Maltodextrin, Physicochemical property, Response surface methodology
Introduction
Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. Et Zucc.) is comprised of 85% water, 10% sugar, and 5% organic acid. It is often used for commercial purposes such as syrup extract, vinegar, jam, wine, and pickled vegetables. A high respiration rate causes a rapid change in the quality of Japanese apricot during storage, resulting in color changes in fruit softening (Shin, 1995). Among these processed products, Japanese apricot juice is the most popular material that can be further processed into other value-added products. However, fruit juice should be stored at low temperatures, and its use has disadvantages such as expensive transportation and storage costs. In contrast, the powdered form is lighter in weight and cheaper in transportation costs. Therefore, it is more advantageous to develop Japanese apricot juice in a powdered form.
Different drying techniques, namely hot air drying, freeze drying, and spray drying, have been used in the food industry to enhance productivity and product quality. Spray drying is one of the most widely used processing methods powder production in liquid foods due to its low cost and quick drying speed (Tamime, 2009). Spray drying can convert juice into dehydrated powder to extend shelf-life during storage. It is used in industrial applications to process beverages, soup, ice cream. The quality of the powder produced by spray drying depends on the dry air characteristic, type of carrier agent, the interaction between hot air and droplets in the chamber, and the scale of the spray dry used (Nguyen et al., 2020). The most widely used carrier agent in fruit juice powder production is MD (Gabas et al., 2007). MD is a starch hydrolysis product mainly composed of D-glucose units connected by α (1 → 4) glycosidic bonds. It has a molecular weight of 180 g/mol and a dextrose equivalency of 20 (Whistler et al., 2012). MD is widely used as a carrier in spray drying because it is cheaper than other carriers and can increase the powder recovery rate by reducing the stickiness of spray-dried products. Also, MD is widely used as a carrier agent not only because it reduces the oxidation of the cell wall matrix, but also because it is useful in bulking and film formation. Peng et al. (2013) found that the retention of some food properties, such as nutrients, pigments, and flavorings, during spray drying is due to MD. It can protect the feed material against chemical and enzymatic reactions and also reduce the moisture of the feed material (Wang et al., 2009). MD is also highly soluble in water. As this property may significantly reduce the viscosity of the feed, MD is considered adequate for spray drying (Pierucci et al., 2007).
This study aims to determine the optimal spray-drying conditions of JAJP juice using regression analysis and the response surface methodology (RSM). RSM is a statistical and mathematical technique that analyzes and optimizes processes that involve several variables (Poodi et al., 2018).
The aim of this research is (1) to investigate the effects of different IAT and MD concentrations on the physicochemical properties of JAJP and (2) to find the optimal conditions of the spray drying process.
Materials & Methods
Materials
Japanese apricot juice was acquired from a local juice production company in Gwangyang, Korea, and kept at 4 °C until use. The maltodextrin (starch; Daesang, Seoul, Korea) with 20 dextrose equivalents (DE) was purchased from a local market in Gwangju, Korea. Gallic acid, 2,2–diphenyl–1–picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), L-ascorbic acid, ( −)-catechin, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, sucrose, and D fructose were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, and aluminum chloride were acquired from Daejung Chemicals and Metals (Siheung, Gyeonggido, S. Korea).
Methods
Juice preparation
Initially, Japanese apricot juice was at 63° Brix. Using distilled water, the juice was diluted until 10° Brix. Once 10° Brix was reached, the total juice solids were added with MD of range of 10% to 30% (w/v).
Spray drying
Similar to the process by Kim et al. (2021), spray drying of Japanese apricot juice was performed using a pilot-scale spray dryer (MH-8, Mehyun Engineering, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) with a rotary disc atomizer (Fig. S1). Using a peristaltic pump, 1.5 mm diameter nozzle was used to feed the samples into the main chamber. Pump rotation speed controlled the feed flow rate. The atomizer speed was constant at 9860 rpm, feed rate at 12 mL/min, and compressor air pressure at 0.74 MPa. The inlet air temperature was manipulated at a range from 130 to 180 °C.
Experimental design
RSM is used to analyze experimental data to optimize process parameters. 13 experiments were conducted with RSM using a twelve-level central composite design (CCD). In this experiment, two independent variables that were manipulated were MD concentration and IAT. MD concentration was manipulated between the range of 10% and 30%, and IAT was manipulated between the range of 130 °C and 180 °C. For analysis, each of these two independent variables (i.e., MD concentration (X1) and IAT (X2)) were coded into four levels: − 1, 0, 1, and + α. The value for alpha (1.414) was derived for the purpose of enabling rotatability in the design (Table S1). Drying yield, moisture content, color, vitamin C content, DPPH radial-scavenging activity, pH, WSI, TFC, TPC, and bulk density were used as the parameters for determining the quality properties of Japanese apricot juice powder. All of these parameters were optimized using RSM.
Physicochemical characteristic
Drying yield
The drying yield of Japanese apricot juice was calculated as follows:
where M is the mass of dry powder, which was collected from the spray-dryer collection chamber, and TS is the mass of total solids, including both soluble and insoluble solids after MD was added to the juice.
Moisture content
The moisture content was measured by placing the sample in the oven at 105 °C until a constant dried weight was achieved (A.O.A.C, 2016).
Color measurement
Sample color was measured by using a colorimeter (CR-400, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). In this study, three color values that were obtained are L* (brightness), a* (red), and b* (yellow and blue) (Chang et al., 2020).
Bulk density
Each sample of 2 g of JAJP was placed in a 10 mL graduated cylinder in a vortex vibrator and was vibrated for 1 min. After the process, the mass and volume of the JAJP were measured. Based on the measurements, the bulk density (g/mL) is calculated as the ratio of the mass and the volume of the JAJP (Rajam & Anandharamakrishnan, 2015).
Water solubility index (WSI)
Each sample of 2 g of JAJP was added to distilled water (25 mL) at 30 °C. The sample solution was intermittently mixed for 20 min and centrifuged at 2016 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred into a Petri dish and the precipitate was dried overnight at 105 °C. Then, the weight was measured. As a result, WSI represents the percentage of total dry solid of the spray dried samples (Anderson, 1982).
pH
To each sample of 2 g of JAJP, distilled water (25 mL) was mixed, homogenized, and centrifuged at 2016 × g for 15 min. Then, a pH meter (EF-7732, Istek, Seoul, Korea) was used to measure the pH of the supernatant (Robert, 2003).
Vitamin C content
Vitamin C content was measured using the technique by Das and Eun (2018). 0.5 mL of diluted JAJP was added to 0.5 mL of 2,6–dichlorophenol indophenol chloride solution (0.1 mg/mL). The mixed reactant was incubated for 5 min at 21 °C and absorbance was measured at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer. Vitamin C content was determined based on a standard curve of L-ascorbic acid (mg/g).
DPPH radical-scavenging activity
DPPH radical-scavenging activity was analyzed using the method by Das and Eun (2018). 950 μL of 100 μM DPPH reagent ethanol solution was combined with 50 μL of powder solution (1/15 in distilled water). The mixture was incubated at 21 C for 30 min. The scavenging activity of JAJP was measured using a spectrophotometer at 517 nm. Distilled water was used as a control. The percentage of DPPH radical-scavenging activity was calculated based on a equation listed below:
Total phenol content (TPC)
TPC was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent by the method of Das and Eun (2018). 1.75 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was combined with approximately 0.25 mL of a dilute powder solution. Then, the JAJP was mixed with 0.5 mL of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and incubated at 21 °C for 30 min in a dark place. Absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 725 nm. Using gallic acid was used as the standard, the results were expressed as μg GAE/100 g.
Total flavonoid content (TFC)
The TFC was analyzed using the aluminum chloride-based colorimetric analysis by Das and Eun (2018). 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO2) was mixed with 1 mL solution (1/10 with distilled water) and left to stand for 5 min. The sample was treated with 0.3 mL of 10% aluminum chloride (AlCl3) and incubated for 6 min, then 2 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added. After vortexing, the absorbance of mixed solution was measured at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer. The calibration curve was constructed using Catechin. TFC values are shown as micrograms of catechin per milliliter of JAJP (μg CE/100 g).
Results and discussion
Drying yield
For production of spray-dried powders, drying yield is considered an important parameter. Under the combination of 30% MD concentration and IAT 130 °C, a maximum yield of 67% was found (Table 1). The powder yield for JAJP varied from 23 to 67% (Table 2). Figure 1(A) demonstrates the drying yield increased as the MD concentration increased. According to Table 3, drying yield is significantly affected by MD concentration (P < 0.05).
| 1 |
where A = MD concentration, B = inlet air temperature (°C).
Table 1.
Experimental data for the optimization of spray-dried Japanese apricot juice powder added with maltodextrin
| STD | RUN | A | B | Response 1 | Response 2 | Response 3 | Response 4 | Response 5 | Response 6 | Response 7 | Response 8 | Response 9 | Response 10 | Response 11 | Response 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 10 | 130 | 23 | 7.37 | 44.27 | 8.65 | 15.59 | 148.24 | 35.86 | 178.88 | 2.69 | 376.58 | 86.44 | 0.8 |
| 5 | 2 | 10 | 155 | 47 | 6.39 | 44.08 | 9.09 | 14.46 | 136.86 | 28.52 | 200.33 | 2.77 | 379.18 | 88.41 | 0.4 |
| 10 | 3 | 20 | 155 | 56 | 4.97 | 41.03 | 8.17 | 16.79 | 135.72 | 27 | 135.98 | 2.8 | 347.05 | 90.7 | 0.5 |
| 8 | 4 | 20 | 190 | 54 | 1.59 | 32.18 | 9.46 | 8.43 | 124.53 | 19.84 | 164.13 | 2.9 | 392.85 | 94.21 | 0.36 |
| 12 | 5 | 20 | 155 | 56 | 4.97 | 41.03 | 8.17 | 16.79 | 135.72 | 27 | 135.98 | 2.8 | 347.05 | 90.7 | 0.5 |
| 13 | 6 | 20 | 155 | 56 | 4.97 | 41.03 | 8.17 | 16.79 | 135.72 | 27 | 135.98 | 2.8 | 347.05 | 90.7 | 0.5 |
| 7 | 7 | 20 | 130 | 60 | 6.4 | 45.79 | 7.67 | 17.46 | 137.38 | 28.96 | 134.19 | 2.74 | 304.99 | 87.13 | 0.8 |
| 6 | 8 | 34 | 155 | 58 | 3.87 | 53 | 7.68 | 18.77 | 128.53 | 26.07 | 121.33 | 2.85 | 317.05 | 94.65 | 0.8 |
| 2 | 9 | 30 | 130 | 67 | 5.16 | 52.82 | 6.45 | 19.48 | 134.3 | 28.71 | 112.74 | 2.78 | 275.71 | 91.61 | 0.8 |
| 9 | 10 | 20 | 155 | 56 | 4.97 | 41.03 | 8.17 | 16.79 | 135.72 | 27 | 135.98 | 2.8 | 347.05 | 90.7 | 0.5 |
| 11 | 11 | 20 | 155 | 56 | 4.97 | 41.03 | 8.17 | 16.79 | 135.72 | 27 | 135.98 | 2.8 | 347.05 | 90.7 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 12 | 10 | 180 | 25 | 2.88 | 39.06 | 9.49 | 9.83 | 128.23 | 26 | 279.39 | 2.79 | 438.4 | 90.24 | 0.57 |
| 4 | 13 | 30 | 180 | 65 | 2.64 | 33.14 | 9.29 | 13.38 | 125.41 | 14.21 | 143.58 | 2.88 | 347.29 | 91.61 | 0.6 |
*All the responses are mean values of three replicates
A = maltodextrin concentration (%, B = inlet air temperature (°C), response 1 = drying yield (%), response 2 = moisture content (%), response 3 = color L* value, response 4 = color a* value, response 5 = color b* value, response 6 = vitamin C content (mg/g), response 7 = DPPH radical-scavenging activity (%), response 8 = total phenol content (μg GAE/100 g), response 9 = pH, response 10 = total flavonoid content (μg CE/100 g), response 11 = water solubility index (%), response 12 = bulk density (g/mL)
Table 2.
Criteria and limits of the optimized spray drying of Japanese apricot juice powder added with maltodextrin
| Name | Goal | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limit | Limit | ||
| Maltodextrin (%) | is in range | 10 | 30 |
| Inlet air temperature (°C) | is in range | 130 | 180 |
| Drying Yield (%) | Maximize | 23 | 67 |
| Moisture content (%) | Minimize | 1.59 | 7.37 |
| L* | Maximize | 32.18 | 53 |
| a* | is in range | 6.45 | 9.49 |
| b* | is in range | 8.43 | 19.48 |
| Vitamin C content (mg/g) | Maximize | 124.53 | 148.24 |
| DPPH radical-scavenging activity (%) | Maximize | 14.21 | 35.86 |
| Total phenol content (μg GAE/100 g) | maximize | 112.74 | 279.39 |
| pH | is in range | 2.69 | 2.9 |
| Total flavonoid content (μg CE/100 g) | Maximize | 275.71 | 438.4 |
| Water solubility index (%) | Maximize | 86.44 | 94.65 |
| Bulk density (g/mL) | Maximize | 0.36 | 0.8 |
Fig. 1.
Response surface plots representing the effects of IAT and MD concentration on (A) drying yield, (B) moisture content, (C) bulk density, and (D) water solubility index and (E) pH
Table 3.
Regression coefficients for the prediction of response variables and their significance levels
| Source | Response 1 | Response 2 | Response 3 | Response 4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | p-value Prob > F | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | p-value Prob > F | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | p-value Prob > F | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | p-value Prob > F | |
| Model | 1366.64 | 2 | 683.32 | 8.48 | 0.007 | 30.90 | 5 | 6.18 | 93.04 | < 0.0001 | 430.73 | 5 | 86.15 | 32.54 | 0.0001 | 8.64 | 5 | 1.73 | 126.36 | < 0.0001 |
| A | 1362.61 | 1 | 1362.61 | 16.91 | 0.0021 | 4.08 | 1 | 4.08 | 61.38 | 0.0001 | 11.80 | 1 | 11.80 | 4.46 | 0.0727 | 2.53 | 1 | 2.53 | 184.77 | < 0.0001 |
| B | 3.77 | 1 | 3.77 | 0.05 | 0.833 | 20.18 | 1 | 20.18 | 303.79 | < 0.0001 | 206.19 | 1 | 206.19 | 77.88 | < 0.0001 | 4.52 | 1 | 4.52 | 330.22 | < 0.0001 |
| AB | – | – | – | – | – | 0.97 | 1 | 0.97 | 14.61 | 0.0065 | 52.35 | 1 | 52.35 | 19.77 | 0.003 | 1.00 | 1 | 1.00 | 73.12 | < 0.0001 |
| A2 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.675 | 74.16 | 1 | 74.16 | 28.01 | 0.0011 | 0.17 | 1 | 0.17 | 12.57 | 0.0094 |
| B2 | – | – | – | – | – | 1.28 | 1 | 1.28 | 19.23 | 0.0032 | 12.17 | 1 | 12.17 | 4.60 | 0.0693 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.04 | 2.91 | 0.1317 |
| Residual | 805.67 | 10 | 80.57 | – | – | 0.46 | 7 | 0.07 | – | – | 18.53 | 7 | 2.65 | – | – | 0.10 | 7 | 0.01 | – | – |
| Lack of Fit | 805.67 | 6 | 134.28 | – | – | 0.46 | 3 | 0.15 | – | – | 18.53 | 3 | 6.18 | – | – | 0.10 | 3 | 0.03 | – | – |
| Pure Error | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Cor Total | 2172.31 | 12 | – | – | – | 31.37 | 12 | – | – | – | 449.26 | 12 | – | – | – | 8.74 | 12 | – | – | – |
| Response 5 | Response 6 | Response 7 | Response 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 126.24 | 5 | 25.25 | 1043.84 | < 0.0001 | 437.17 | 3 | 145.72 | 48.99 | < 0.0001 | 254.67 | 2 | 127.333 | 28.3547 | < 0.0001 | 22,195.2 | 5 | 4439.04 | 24.32 | 0.0003 | |||
| A | 22.45 | 1 | 22.45 | 928.00 | < 0.0001 | 107.75 | 1 | 107.75 | 36.22 | 0.0002 | 67.06 | 1 | 67.0604 | 14.9331 | 0.0031 | 15,295.1 | 1 | 15,295.10 | 83.78 | < 0.0001 | |||
| B | 56.81 | 1 | 56.81 | 2348.75 | < 0.0001 | 299.14 | 1 | 299.14 | 100.56 | < 0.0001 | 188.00 | 1 | 188.004 | 41.8648 | < 0.0001 | 3397.96 | 1 | 3397.96 | 18.61 | 0.0035 | |||
| AB | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 1.19 | 0.3105 | 30.91 | 1 | 30.91 | 10.39 | 0.0104 | – | – | – | – | – | 1213.48 | 1 | 1213.48 | 6.65 | 0.0366 | |||
| A2 | 0.26 | 1 | 0.26 | 10.62 | 0.0139 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4158.15 | 1 | 4158.15 | 22.78 | 0.002 | |||
| B2 | 20.14 | 1 | 20.14 | 832.79 | < 0.0001 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 267.078 | 1 | 267.08 | 1.46 | 0.2657 | |||
| Residual | 0.17 | 7 | 0.02 | – | – | 26.77 | 9 | 2.97 | – | – | 44.9073 | 10 | 4.49073 | – | – | 1277.92 | 7 | 182.56 | – | – | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.17 | 3 | 0.06 | – | – | 26.77 | 5 | 5.35 | – | – | 44.9073 | 6 | 7.48456 | – | – | 1277.92 | 3 | 425.97 | – | – | |||
| Pure Error | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | |||
| Cor Total | 126.41 | 12 | – | – | – | 463.95 | 12 | – | – | – | 299.57 | 12 | – | – | – | 23,473.1 | 12 | – | – | – | |||
| Response 9 | Response 10 | Response 11 | Response 12 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 0.03 | 2 | 0.02 | 105.48 | < 0.0001 | 18,435.55 | 2 | 9217.77 | 64.39 | < 0.0001 | 65.61 | 2 | 32.81 | 50.53 | < 0.0001 | 0.26 | 5 | 0.05 | 7.10 | 0.01 |
| A | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 69.61 | < 0.0001 | 10,291.69 | 1 | 10,291.69 | 71.89 | < 0.0001 | 37.36 | 1 | 37.36 | 57.55 | < 0.0001 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 2.63 | 0.15 |
| B | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 141.70 | < 0.0001 | 8111.43 | 1 | 8111.43 | 56.66 | < 0.0001 | 28.37 | 1 | 28.37 | 43.69 | < 0.0001 | 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 20.92 | 0.00 |
| AB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.86 |
| A2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 6.69 | 0.04 |
| B2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 4.19 | 0.08 |
| Residual | 0.00 | 10 | 0.00 | – | – | 1431.54 | 10 | 143.15 | – | – | 6.49 | 10 | 0.65 | – | – | 0.05 | 7 | 0.01 | – | – |
| Lack of Fit | 0.00 | 6 | 0.00 | – | – | 1431.54 | 6 | 238.59 | – | – | 6.49 | 6 | 1.08 | – | – | 0.05 | 3 | 0.02 | – | – |
| Pure Error | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.00 | – | – |
| Cor Total | 0.04 | 12 | – | – | – | 19,867.092 | 12 | – | – | – | 72.11 | 12 | – | – | – | 0.31 | 12 | – | – | – |
*P < 0.05
A = maltodextrin concentration (%), B = inlet air temperature (°C), response 1 = drying yield (%), response 2 = moisture content (%), response 3 = color L* value, response 4 = color a* value
*P < 0.05
A = maltodextrin concentration (%), B = inlet air temperature (°C), response 5 = color b* value, response 6 = vitamin C content (mg/g) response 7 = DPPH radical-scavenging activity (%), response 8 = total phenol content (μg GAE/100 g)
*P < 0.05
A = maltodextrin concentration (%), B = inlet air temperature (°C), response 9 = pH, response 10 = total flavonoid content (μg CE/100 g), response 11 = water solubility index (%), response 12 = bulk density (g/mL)
Equation (1) demonstrates the relationship of MD concentration and IAT on the drying yield of JAJP. Drying yield is positively impacted by the MD concentration of JAJP and negatively influenced by IAT. Based on the results, the drying yield decreased at a drying temperature of 155 °C or higher. This trend can happen because the powder particles do not reach the drying chamber walls when the temperature is very high, and the IAT negatively affects the drying yield. Similar results have been reported in other studies (Aragüez‐Fortes et al., 2019). MD concentration, on the other hand, positively affects the drying yield of JAJP. This effect is likely to have occurred from the increase in solid content. A similar study (Tan et al., 2015) found that the dry yield increases in proportion to the MD concentration.
Moisture content
The moisture content of JAJP is shown in Table 1. The lowest moisture content was recorded at 1.59% when 20% MD concentration was used at 190 °C. Table 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of moisture content. As shown in Fig. 1(B), a decrease in moisture content was shown by increasing MD concentration and IAT. Table 3 indicates that the moisture content of JAJP had a considerable impact on MD concentration and IAT (P < 0.05).
| 2 |
The derived Eq. (2) indicates that MD concentration and IAT negatively affect the moisture content of JAJP. IAT increases the evaporation of water molecules and decreases the moisture content as a result. As Fazaeli et al. (2012) reported, high IAT promoted the heat to transfer to the particles leading to the evaporation of water and reduction in moisture content. This effect of IAT on the moisture content was reported in other studies using pink guava powder and acai juice power (Patil et al., 2014; Tonon et al., 2011). On the other hand, the moisture content of JAJP was observed to decrease as MD concentration increased, showing a negative effect between them, which can be explained by the increase in total solid content. Another study showed a similar result that MD decreased moisture content and increased the total solid content of the tested samples (Caliskan and Dirim, 2013). In the present study, a major variable affecting the moisture content of JAJP is high inlet air temperature.
Color
Color is an important sensory attribute that helps determine the quality of a powdered product. Different MD concentrations and IAT affecting the color of JAJP are shown in Tables 1, 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of color. Figure 2(A) shows a directly proportional relationship between L* values and MD concentration due to the increasing number of solids during spray drying. In contrast, this darkening in color was likely due to the high temperature in the air. IAT positively influenced while MD negatively affected the a* values. Conversely, for b* values, both IAT and MD concentration had a negative effect (Table 3). Based on Table 3, the different levels of MD concentrations had no statistically significant effect on L* values of JAJP, Whereas IAT significantly decreased the L* values (P < 0.05).
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Equations (3, 5) indicates the negative effect of IAT on the L* and b* values of JAJP and the positive effect of MD concentration on the L* and b* values of JAJP. In contrast, Eq. (4) shows the positive effect of IAT with the a* values of JAJP and the negative effect of MD concentration with the a* values of JAJP. The negative effect between IAT and L* and b* values can be attributed to the non−enzymatic browning process when high heat is introduced during the spray−drying process. On the other hand, as IAT increases, the a* value increases, which may explain that non−enzymatic browning reactions may occur during spray drying. Likewise, Nishad et al. (2017) reported that juice contents and carrier concentrations affected color. In addition, the color changes caused by hot air temperature increases may result from caramelization and Maillard reactions. Between the two factors associated with the change in L*, a*, and b* colors, IAT showed a greater effect compared to MD concentration, which means that the color of the product greatly depends on the drying temperature. Therefore, it is important to carefully design the IAT to obtain the desired color of the spray−dried powder.
Fig. 2.
Response surface plots representing the effects of IAT and MD concentration on (A) L*, (B)a*, and (C) b*value
Bulk density
The results for bulk density of the spray-dried JAJP at different MD concentrations and IAT are shown in Tables 1 and 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of bulk density. Figure 1(C) shows a tendency that the bulk density of JAJP increases with increasing MD concentration and decreases with increasing IAT. The results show that the bulk density of JAJP has a significant effect on MD concentration, whereas IAT has no significant effect (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
| 6 |
Equation (6) demonstrates the negative relationship between IAT with the bulk density of JAJP. Comparable results from Singh and Hathan (2017) were reported, namely that bulk density decreased with increasing inlet temperature. An increase in IAT often leads to dried layers forming on the droplet surface. However, at higher temperatures, a vapor-impermeable film is formed on the droplet surface due to thinning or case hardening. Then, vapor bubbles are generated and expand the droplets (Chegini and Ghobadian, 2005; Finney et al., 2002; Tonon et al., 2008, 2011). As a result, the density of JAJP decreases with increasing IAT.
Water solubility index (WSI)
Table 1 indicates the results for WSI of the spray−dried JAJP at different MD concentrations and IAT. Table 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of WSI. Figure 1(D) represents the WSI of the spray−dried JAJP. WSI was found to decrease at higher levels of IAT and MD concentration. The obtained WSI of JAJP was significantly affected by varying MD concentration and IAT (P < 0.05)(Table 3).
| 7 |
Equation (7) demonstrates that IAT and MD concentration have a positive effect on the WSI of JAJP. This is due to the increased WSI with increasing IAT and MD concentration. As the inlet air temperature becomes higher, the density of the produced powder becomes lower, while its solubility becomes higher. It can be seen that bulk density was oppositely affected since the bulk density became lower as the solubility increased (Fazaeli et al., 2012). In addition, increasing the IAT led to the decrease in the bulk density and increase in the water solubility. Phisut (2012) reported that MD has a chemical structure that absorbs moisture more easily from ambient water. Similar observations were reported by Pires and da Silva Pena (2017). Therefore, increasing IAT and MD concentration during spray drying increases the WSI of the JAJP.
pH
Table 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of pH. Figure 1(E) indicates the tendency of pH to rise with increasing IAT. It is found that IAT had a more marked effect on the pH of JAJP than MD concentration did (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
| 8 |
Equation (8) demonstrates that IAT positively affected the pH of JAJP. This outcome can be elucidated by the change in the organic acid content of Japanese apricot juice with increasing temperature. Lee et al. (2017) also presented that the pH change is directly affected by the organic acid content. Therefore, IAT is the main factor affecting the pH of JAJP, not the MD concentration.
Vitamin C content
The effects of the IAT and MD concentration on the vitamin C content of spray−dried JAJP are shown in Fig. 3(A). As both the IAT and MD concentrations increased, the vitamin C content decreased. The observed Vitamin C content in JAJP varied between the ranges of 124.53 mg per 100 g and 148.24 mg per 100 g (Table 2). The lowest value of vitamin C content at 124.53 mg per 100 g was obtained at 190 °C IAT and 20% MD concentration, while the highest value of vitamin C at 148.24 mg per 100 g at 130 °C IAT and 10% MD concentration. From this, the trend in which vitamin C decreases as IAT increases could be observed (Table 1). The vitamin C content of JAJP was significantly influenced by MD concentration and IAT (Table 3) (P < 0.05).
| 9 |
Equation (9) demonstrates that the IAT and MD concentration is negatively affected by the vitamin C content of JAJP. The vitamin C content decreased due to the reduction of particle size and faster decomposition of compounds as the IAT and MD concentration increased. The high IAT of the spray-drying process contributes to a significant decrease of vitamin C content because vitamin C is highly sensitive to heat (Shishir et al., 2017). Another study on spray-dried mandarin beverage powder presented that vitamin C content tended to decrease with increasing MD concentration and IAT (Lee et al., 2017). Thus, the reduction in vitamin C content could be caused by the increase in oxidation of vitamin C as affected by hot air, and by the increase in MD concentration. Further research is needed to determine other parameters and techniques that can minimize vitamin C content loss.
Fig. 3.
Response surface plots representing the effects of IAT and MD concentration on (A) vitamin C content, (B) DPPH radical-scavenging activity, (C) total phenol content, and (D) total flavonoid content
DPPH radical-scavenging activity
Table 1 indicates the DPPH radical−scavenging activity of spray−dried JAJP at varying levels of MD concentrations and IAT. The DPPH radical−scavenging activity ranged from 14.21% to 35.86% (Table 2). Figure 3(B) reveals the relationship between DPPH radical−scavenging activity and drying conditions of JAJP, Both IAT and MD concentration had a negative effect on the DPPH radical−scavenging activity of JAJP. DPPH radical−scavenging activity of JAJP markedly impacted by MD concentration and IAT (P < 0.05) in Table 3.
| 10 |
Equation (10) demonstrates that IAT and MD concentrations negatively influence the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of JAJP. DPPH radical-scavenging activity decreased significantly as IAT increased from 130 to 180 °C, and this result appears to be due to the high drying temperature. Mishra et al. (2014) explained that this phenomenon was caused by the decrease in DPPH radical-scavenging activity as MD concentration and IAT increased. Thus, the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of JAJP is affected more by IAT than by the MD concentration.
Total phenol content (TPC)
Table 1 displayed the results for TPC of spray−dried JAJP, which range from 112.74 to 279.39 μg GAE/100 g JAJP (Table 2). Figure 3(C) shows an increasing trend in the TPC of JAJP as the temperature increases. The TPC is significantly affected by the IAT and MD concentration (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
| 11 |
Equation (11) demonstrates that the IAT positively influenced TPC of JAJP, whereas MD concentration negatively affected these factors. This trend of MD concentration is predicted to be due to the solid content increase, which decreases the amount of phenolic compounds. Similarity was found by Mishra et al. (2014), that the increase in the MD concentration from 5 to 9% led to a significant decrease in the TPC content of the powder. Also, it is found that IAT positively affects the TPC of JAJP. This positive relationship is due to the increase in polyphenol synthesis with higher IAT. A study by Hwang (2006) reported a similar result using pears. Hwang (2006) reported that antioxidants are more heat resistant than vitamin C and that most of the plant's phenolic components are in the form of glycosides or esters in a more stable conjugated form.
Total flavonoid content (TFC)
Table 1 indicates the TFC of spray−dried JAJP at varying MD concentrations and IAT. Table 2 shows the minimum and maximum values of TFC. Figure 3(D) illustrates the increase in the MD concentration predicts a decrease in the TFC of JAJP, while an increase in the IAT predicts an increase in the TFC. Based on the p−value found in Table 3, IAT and MD concentration were found to have a significant effect on the TFC in JAJP (P < 0.05).
| 12 |
As shown in Eq. (12), the TFC of JAJP is positively affected by the IAT and negatively affected by the MD concentration. An explanation for this trend in the TFC is due to flavonoid synthesis and polymerization, which these processes affect the total content of the compounds. Comparable results have been presented using orange juice that the increase in TFC is due to the increase in TFC due to the reaction or structural decomposition of various phenolic compounds occurring at high temperatures (185 °C) upon spray drying (Saikia et al., 2015). Ioannou et al. (2012) reported that drying process generally results in the breakdown of flavonoids. However, the present study indicated that spray drying is a less aggressive technique that preserves flavonoids.
Optimization
Thirteen different experimental treatments based on the CCD were utilized to investigate the quality attributes of JAJP on the different levels of IAT and MD concentration. Results from the spray-drying process show that all these variables have significant effects on the physicochemical properties of JAJP. Optimum conditions for the spray drying of JAJP with MD as a drying aid were determined to obtain the specific values for each variable as summarized in Table 2. The overlay plot shown in Fig. S2 indicates the optimized parameters proposed by expert software design to obtain the required range of responses. Therefore, the conditions for spray drying of JAJP can be optimized using this selected model. Developing spray-dried JAJP with maltodextrin not only reduces shipping cost but also increases shelf life. In order to further promote the commercial expansion of JAJP, research on the shelf-life and sensory attributes of spray-dried JAJP are recommended in the future.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive funding.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ju-Hui Kim, Email: joohee5466@naver.com.
Jang H. Kim, Email: janghok@uidaho.edu
Jong-Bang Eun, Email: jbeun@jnu.ac.kr, Email: jongbang@hotmail.com.
References
- Anderson RA. Water absorption and solubility and amylograph characteristics of roll-cooked small grain products. Cereal Chemistry. 1982;59:265–269. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC (Ed.), Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (20th ed.), AOAC international, Maryland, USA (2016)
- Aragüez‐Fortes Y, Robaina‐Morales LM, Pino JA. Optimization of the spray‐drying parameters for developing guava powder. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 42: e13230 (2019)
- Caliskan G, Dirim SN. The effects of the different drying conditions and the amounts of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of sumac extract. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2013;91:539–548. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2013.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chang LS, Tan YL, Pui LP. Production of spray-dried enzyme-liquefied papaya (Carica papaya L.) powder. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 23: e2019181 (2020)
- Chegini GR, Ghobadian B. Effect of spray-drying conditions on physical properties of orange juice powder. Drying Technology. 2005;23:657–668. doi: 10.1081/DRT-200054161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Das PR, Eun JB. A comparative study of ultra-sonication and agitation extraction techniques on bioactive metabolites of green tea extract. Food Chemistry. 2018;253:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fazaeli M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Kalbasi-Ashtari A, Omid M. Effect of process conditions and carrier concentration for improving drying yield and other quality attributes of spray dried black mulberry (Morus nigra) juice. International Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;8:1–20. doi: 10.1515/1556-3758.2023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Finney J, Buffo R, Reineccius GA. Effects of type of atomization and processing temperatures on the physical properties and stability of spray-dried flavors. Journal of Food Science. 2002;67:1108–1114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09461.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gabas AL, Telis VRN, Sobral PJDA, Telis-Romero J. Effect of maltodextrin and arabic gum in water vapor sorption thermodynamic properties of vacuum dried pineapple pulp powder. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;82:246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.02.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang IG, Woo KS, Kim TM, Kim DJ, Yang MH, Jeong HS. Change of physicochemical characteristics of Korean pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) juice with heat treatment conditions. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2006;38(3):342–347. [Google Scholar]
- Ioannou I, Hafsa I, Hamdi S, Charbonnel C, Ghoul M. Review of the effects of food processing and formulation on flavonol and anthocyanin behaviour. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;111(2):208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JH, Kim JH, Eun JB. Optimization of spray drying process of Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.) juice powder using nondigestible maltodextrin by response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of Food Science and Technology. 1-11 (2021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Lee KC, Yoon YS, Li FZ, Eun JB. Effects of inlet air temperature and concentration of carrier agents on physicochemical properties, sensory evaluation of spray-dried mandarin (Citrus unshiu) beverage powder. Applied Biological Chemistry. 2017;60(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/s13765-016-0246-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mishra P, Mishra S, Mahanta CL. Effect of maltodextrin concentration and inlet temperature during spray drying on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of amla (Emblica officinalis) juice powder. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2014;92:252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2013.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen DQ, Nguyen TH, Allaf K. Volumetric heat transfer coefficient in spray drying of soymilk powder. Drying Technology. 1-7 (2020)
- Nishad J, Selvan CJ, Mir SA, Bosco SJD. Effect of spray drying on physical properties of sugarcane juice powder (Saccharum officinarum L.). Journal of food science and technology. 54: 687-697 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Patil V, Chauhan AK, Singh RP. Optimization of the spraydrying process for developing guava powder using response surface methodology. Powder Technology. 2014;253:230–236. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng Z, Li J, Guan Y, Zhao G. Effect of carriers on physicochemical properties, antioxidant activities and biological components of spray-dried purple sweet potato flours. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2013;51:348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Phisut N. Spray drying technique of fruit juice powder: some factors influencing the properties of product. International Food Research Journal. 2012;19(4):1297. [Google Scholar]
- Pierucci APT, Andrade LR, Farina M, Pedrosa C, Rocha-Leão MHM. Comparison of α-tocopherol microparticles produced with different wall materials: pea protein a new interesting alternative. Journal of Microencapsulation. 2007;24:201–213. doi: 10.1080/02652040701281167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pires FCS, da Silva Pena R. Optimization of spray drying process parameters for tucupi powder using the response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017;54:3459–3472. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2803-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poodi Y, Bimakr M., Ganjloo A., Zarringhalami S. Intensification of bioactive compounds extraction from Feijoa (Feijoa sellowiana Berg.) leaves using ultrasonic waves. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 108: 37-50 (2018)
- Rajam R, Anandharamakrishnan C. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum (MTCC 5422) with fructooligosaccharide as wallmaterial by spray drying. LWT—Food Science and Technology. 60: 773-780 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Robert M. Changes in carotenoids contents in pureed and cooked carrot and spinach during storage. The Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2003;19:83–95. [Google Scholar]
- Saikia S, Mahnot NK, Mahanta CL. Effect of spray drying of four fruit juices on physicochemical, phytochemical and antioxidant properties. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2015;39:1656–1664. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shin SC. Changes in components of Ume fruit during development and maturation. J Oriental Bot Res. Res. 8: 259-264 (1995)
- Shishir MRI, Chen W. Trends of spray drying: A critical review on drying of fruit and vegetable juices. Trends in food science & technology. 65: 49-67 (2017)
- Singh B, Hathan BS. Process optimization of spray drying of beetroot Juice. Journal of food science and technology. 54: 2241-2250 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Tamime AY. (Ed.). Dairy powders and concentrated products. John Wiley & Sons. (2009)
- Tan SP, Tuyen CK, Parks SE, Stathopoulos CE, Roach PD. Effects of the spray drying temperatures on the physiochemical properties of an encapsulated bitter melon aqueous extract powder. Powder Technology. 2015;281:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.04.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tonon RV, Brabet C, Hubinger MD. Influence of process conditions on the physicochemical properties of açai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) powder produced by spray drying. Journal of food engineering. 88: 411-418 (2008)
- Tonon RV, Freitas SS, Hubinger MD. Spray drying of açai (Euterpe oleraceae Mart.) juice: effect of inlet air temperature and type of carrier agent. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 35: 691-700 (2011)
- Wang Y, Lu Z, Lv F, Bie X. Study on microencapsulation of curcumin pigments by spray drying. European Food Research and Technology. 2009;229:391–396. doi: 10.1007/s00217-009-1064-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Whistler RL, BeMiller JN, Paschall EF. (Eds.). Starch: chemistry and technology. Academic Press. (2012)
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



