Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021 Feb 4;67:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.12.020

Multifunctional cellulases are potent, versatile tools for a renewable bioeconomy

Evan Glasgow 1,2, Kirk Vander Meulen 1,2, Nate Kuch 1,2, Brian G Fox 1,2
PMCID: PMC8366578  NIHMSID: NIHMS1728105  PMID: 33550093

Abstract

Enzyme performance is critical to the future bioeconomy based on renewable plant materials. Plant biomass can be efficiently hydrolyzed by multifunctional cellulases (MFCs) into sugars suitable for conversion into fuels and chemicals, and MFCs fall into three functional categories. Recent work revealed MFCs with broad substrate specificity, dual exo-activity/endo-activity on cellulose, and intramolecular synergy, among other novel characteristics. Binding modules and accessory catalytic domains amplify MFC and xylanase activity in a wide variety of ways, and processive endoglucanases achieve autosynergy on cellulose. Multidomain MFCs from Caldicellulosiruptor are heat-tolerant, adaptable to variable cellulose crystallinity, and may provide interchangeable scaffolds for recombinant design. Further studies of MFC properties and their reactivity with plant biomass are recommended for increasing biorefinery yields.

Introduction

Global efforts to reduce carbon emissions are spurring technological innovations worldwide. As part of an integrated bioeconomy, the synthesis of fuels and bioproducts from renewable plant biomass may supplant petroleum-derived products, reduce net carbon emissions and promote energy security. Inedible lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) contains vast reserves of convertible carbohydrates and aromatics for next-generation fuel and product synthesis but recovering these molecules from the polymeric matrix of a plant cell wall remains a significant challenge.

Physical and chemical pretreatments render LCB susceptible to cellulases, which hydrolyze the exposed polysaccharides into small, fermentable sugars. The complex polymeric composition of LCB (Figure 1) requires several distinct enzyme activities to liberate as much sugar as possible. While enzymatic deconstruction has several advantages over chemical hydrolysis, enzyme cocktails are a major (up to 30%) operational expense for biorefineries [1]. Reducing the cost of LCB deconstruction is imperative for a viable bioeconomy to produce renewable fuels and bioproducts at competitive prices, and enzymes are a critical cost-reduction target.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Simplified structure of LCB reacting with different classes of enzymes. Processive exocellulases (blue) depolymerize cellulose from reducing or non-reducing ends. Endocellulases (yellow) create new chain ends in amorphous regions. Hemicellulases (red) hydrolyze non-cellulose polysaccharides. Processive endocellulases (green) create new ends and continue to depolymerize. Carbohydrate-targeting and lignin-targeting esterases (light gray and dark gray, resp.) remove acetyl side chains and cleave linkages to lignin. Glucose (white hexagon), mannose (green hexagon), xylose (brown hexagon), galactose (orange hexagon), arabinose (yellow pentagon), lignin (blue hexagon).

Recent investigations identified glycoside hydrolases (GH) with multiple catalytic functions. Here, we define multifunctional cellulases (MFCs) as a subset of GHs that possess, at minimum, β-(1,4)-endoglucanase or cellobiohydrolase activity with two or more polysaccharide types. Multifunctional cellulases (MFCs) may provide a route to lower enzyme costs by reducing the complexity of enzyme cocktails while increasing efficiency of enzyme hydrolysis. This review highlights recent discoveries, mechanistic investigations, and laboratory-scale applications of MFCs and recommends several considerations for future technology development. We also note that many trends in MFC research are occurring in parallel on xylanases, spurred by the abundance of xylan in LCB and the special utilities of pentose sugars in biosynthetic pathways [2].

Better understanding of MFCs may simplify the composition of enzyme cocktails, lower the amount of enzyme needed, and, along with organic co-solvents, may enable the as-yet unmet goal of biomass-agnostic deconstruction, in which a single chemoenzymatic process efficiently deconstructs a variety of LCB feedstocks. Catalytic versatility can thus enable a more robust bioeconomy operable across a variety of agricultural regions and climatic zones [3].

A multi-tiered view of MFCs

We propose a novel, three-tier functional classification system (Figure 2) to help group MFCs by complexity and to distinguish among the different factors contributing to multifunctionality. Tier 1 MFCs consolidate breadth of substrate specificities into a single GH active site, while Tier 2 MFCs incorporate additional non-GH domains or reaction mechanisms that further amplify the native activity. A Tier 3 MFC brings two or more GH domains that catalyze closely associated steps in LCB deconstruction and may synergize in reaction on the same substrate. Tier 3 MFCs may be built from Tier 1 and 2 components, just as the GH domains in Tier 2 MFCs may have Tier 1 broad specificity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Tiers of function in MFCs. Several monospecific enzymes (left) can be replaced by a single Tier 1 MFC (right) possessing broad substrate specificity. Tier 2 MFCs possess additional domains that confer increased activity on native substrates by promoting processivity (left), cleaving crosslinks or branches (right), and so on. Tier 3 enzymes combine several GH and binding domains to achieve intramolecular synergy, for example, by xylanase-cellulase fusion (left) or endoglucanase-exoglucanase fusion (right). Polysaccharide colors and shapes are as in Figure 1.

Tier 1 MFCs: broad substrate specificity in single domains

The simplest MFCs are single-domain GHs with broad substrate specificity. According to the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes Database (CAZy, http://www.cazy.org/), families enriched with MFCs include GH5, 26, 44, 45, and 74 [4], with GH5 being most enriched in broad-specificity endoglucanases. GH5 is divided into subfamilies to help map its many specificities into sequence-similar groups [5]. GH5 endoglucanase activity often co-occurs with endoxylanase [612] or endomannanase [13••,14] activity, in some cases with both [15••,16], as in subfamily 4 (GH5_4). The glucanase efficiency is typically highest (Figure 3), although xylanase activity sometimes exceeds it [7], mimicking the specificity of GH10 xylanases (see ACM60945 [17] and ACY69972 [18] in Figure 3). The identification of gluco-mannanase [19], β-(1,3)(1,4)-mixed-linkage glucanase [20,21] and xyloglucanase [22] activities demonstrates that MFCs accept variations in sugar monomers and linkages, and also tolerate branching. Interestingly, Tier 1 MFCs from GH9 have been found in herbivorous insect genomes, with high expression in the digestive tract and cross-reactivity on cellulose and either xylan or xyloglucan [23,24]. Critically, some Tier 1 MFCs are as efficientas ‘specialized’ monospecific GHs on each of their multiple substrates [25], illustrating that broad specificity and high reactivity are not mutually exclusive. The comparable reactivity of MFCs and monospecific GHs supports the promise of MFCs in designed enzyme cocktails.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Specificity ratios (kcat/KM) for enzymes assayed on substrates with distinct backbone compositions. β-1,4-glucan substrates (carboxymethylcellulose and barley β-1,3-glucan, blue shades); β-1,4 mannose backbone (carob galactomannan, green); β-1,4 xylose backbone substrates (xylans from beechwood, birchwood and oat spelt, red shades); arabinoxylan (orange). GenBank accession code (with reference as superscript) and enzyme domain structure are shown on the left. Enzyme and CBM domains are denoted as ovals labeled with black and white text, respectively, and linker regions are also displayed to approximate proportional scale.

Tier 1 MFCs with more open binding clefts can tolerate a diversity of polysaccharides, including some with non-β-(1,4) linkages or charged sugar residues [18]. For example, a dual cellulase/xylanase from GH26 [with an (αβ)8-barrel fold like that observed in GH5] [26] also hydrolyzed anionic β-(1,4)-polyglucuronic acid in a Ca2+-independent fashion distinct from pectate lyases. In another example, GH131 MFCs (with a β-jelly roll fold) have a widely accessible cleft that can hydrolyze β-(1,4) and β-(1,3) bonds equally well [27]. Activity on chitosan (the cationic, deacetylated form of chitin) is also observed in cellulases encompassing several distinct folds and mechanisms [28]. Thus, MFCs are widely distributed among GH families, offering many options for design of customized enzyme cocktails.

Tier 2 MFCs: multi-domain amplification of reactivity

The combination of a GH and a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) is the most abundant example of a Tier 2 MFC and provides a mechanism to direct the reactivity of an MFC onto different polysaccharides [29]. Various combinations of MFC and CBM can give ~105 distribution of the specificity ratio (kcat/KM) across a breadth of hexose and pentose polysaccharides (Figure 3).

CelE, a cellulosome-associated MFC from Hungateiclostridium thermocellum, is a multidomain enzyme consisting of a GH5 endoglucanase domain, a dockerin domain, and a CE2 domain. The GH5 domain is a Tier 1 MFC that degrades cellulose, mannan, xylan, and several heteropolysaccharides [15••,29,30], while the CE domain deacetylates xylan [31] and further exposes the hemicellulose to the GH5 active site, demonstrating a Tier 2 functionality.

GH amplification can also be achieved by fusion of carbohydrate esterase (CE) domains to xylanases from GH10 and GH11 (Figure 4a). When added in excess as separate proteins, CEs can potentiate xylanases up to 20-fold on some plant biomass [32]. Non-covalent ‘xylanosome’ complexes can confer over threefold synergy by keeping xylanase and acetylxylan esterase in close proximity [33]. Although some of these fusions bind to amorphous cellulose [34], their cellulase activities have only been sparsely explored.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Chord plot illustration of the connections between GH and other domains in Tier 2 and 3 enzymes. Arcs connect modules present in a single gene according to separate listings in the CAZy database. (a) Tier 2 and 3 endoxylanase (GH10, GH11) connections to CE and other GH domains. (b) Tier 2 and 3 endoglucanase (GH5, GH6, GH8, GH9, GH44, or GH48) connections to CE, PL, other GH domains. For simplicity, the multiple carbohydrate esterase (CE) and polysaccharide lyase (PL) families have been merged into single composite entries.

Some xylanases, such as XynY and XynZ from H. thermocellum and Xyn10A/Fae1A from a soil consortium [35], harbor a p-feruloyl esterase domain (CE1), which cleaves linkages to lignin and releases ferulic acid. To our knowledge, this lignin-targeting module has not been found in cellulases, suggesting selective evolution of the most appropriate pairs of catalytic domains in Tier 2 MFCs.

Disruption of substrate superstructure is another Tier 2 mechanism, exemplified by the action of swollenins. Swollenins can increase the activity of both xylanases and cellulases [36,37] up to ~3-fold by weakening the non-covalent interactions between polysaccharide chains. Swollenin fusions to CEs [38] and xylanases [39] have shown promise, but fusions to cellulases have been limited to expansins, the bacterial counterpart [40], and show less impact on activity than swollenins.

Processivity is yet another Tier 2 function that amplifies the native ability of exocellulases to hydrolyze β-(1,4)-glucosidic linkages by threading the substrate polymer into the active site without dissociation [41]. The effect is limited to crystalline cellulose and impacts kcat rather than KM [42]. Processivity is often assisted by a tunnel-shaped active site and an intimately associated CBM. Different exocellulase families exhibit strict specificity for reducing (GH7 and 48) or non-reducing (GH6) ends.

Processivity is not limited to exocellulases. Processive endoglucanases (PEGs) are less understood, but they have been found in microbes lacking a canonical exocellulase [43••]. PEGs are fascinating because they first create new chain ends by endocellulase action, and then processively depolymerize the polysaccharide by exocellulase action (Figure 1, green). PEGs found in GH5 may possess CBMs from families 1, 3, or 6, although their precise function in processivity is less clear and may even be inhibitory [44]. PEGs found in GH9 show close association between the GH domain and a CBM3. One case was found in GH48, demonstrating PEGs may evolve in both endoglucanase and exoglucanase families.

Tier 3 MFCs: multi-domain intramolecular synergy

Two or more GH domains of differing (or similar) reactivity can be encoded by a single gene (Figure 4b). GH5, GH26, and GH44 are three families often found fused to additional GH domains. Fusion of endocellulase and exocellulase (or β-glucosidase) motifs may create intramolecular synergy [45,46], but this is not a general rule: additional CBMs are often required [47]. Synergy in these multidomain enzymes is a complex property, and the position of CBM relative to GH is critical [48].

Bacteria in the genus Caldicellulosiruptor are the top sources of Tier 3 MFCs [49]. Their MFCs are composed typically of two GH domains, interspersed with one to four CBMs, mostly from family 3 [49,50]. While they do not assemble into cellulosomes (which are complex assemblies of enzymes noncovalently bound to scaffoldin proteins by dockerin/cohesion pairs), the arrangements of GHs and CBMs in Caldicellulosiruptor MFCs recapitulate the function of cellulosomes with superior stability and specific activity without the noncovalent assembly domains. These MFCs also deconstruct LCB more effectively than mixtures of free fungal enzymes, and some, like CelA from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii [51••], are agnostic to the crystallinity index of cellulose [52]. CelA connects a GH9 PEG to a GH48 exocellulase, and the enzyme is optimally active at 75°C. The modular assembly, thermostability, and advances in native host expression [53] suggest considerable technological promise for Caldicellulosiruptor MFCs.

MFC reactivity is not confined to LCB polysaccharides. Recently, a cellulase was discovered in hot spring bacteria [54] possessing activity on agar and carrageenan (found in red algae) and amylose (from starch). The enzyme is composed of three GH70 domains, and its ability to degrade polycyclic, heterogeneous, and sulfated polysaccharides (in addition to both α-glycosidic (1,4)-glycosidic bonds and β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds) offers promise for processing marine biomass and enzymatic synthesis of bioactive compounds [55].

Conclusions

Tier 1 broad specificity enzymes add to a growing parts list for cellulase design, yet their ability to degrade LCB is typically limited, despite their broad reactivity. Although improvements in stability are common [56], it has been difficult to surpass modest improvements in catalytic efficiency or achieve broad specificity by sequence optimization of single domains [57], highlighting the importance of bioprospecting for novel Tier 1 MFCs [58,59] and the need for additional screening methods specifically for endo-acting MFCs.

Engineered modularity offers a different approach and greater promise for generating new MFCs by taking advantage of Tier 2 and Tier 3 functionality. Tier 2 phenomena require deeper mechanistic insights, including structural dynamics and other constraints on the interacting domains. In Tier 2, fusion to CBMs and other non-GH domains can expand potential by adding new substrate binding and kinetic mechanisms.

Tier 1 and Tier 2 MFCs are building blocks for multidomain, potentially synergistic Tier 3 enzymes. Combinatorial assembly of multi-domain Tier 3 MFCs can leverage Golden Gate assembly [60] and other rapid domain-swapping techniques [61]. The most compatible domains may come from families with high natural frequency of multidomain fusions, such as GH5, 9, 26, 44, and 48 (Figure 4b). Substituting these domains into the scaffolds of existing Tier 3 cellulases may be a promising strategy, since inter-domain interactions are sensitive to linker length [62], and linker glycosylation can be important [63]. Focusing on MFCs with thermal stability and salt tolerance will facilitate future integration with thermochemical biomass pretreatments, which are critical to obtaining maximum sugar yields in the biorefinery.

Finally, LCB structure itself deserves equal attention if yields of monomer sugars are to be maximized, since LCB composition varies greatly between plant species, growth, and harvest conditions. Enzymatic deconstruction changes the properties of LCB, as do the myriad physical and chemical treatments preceding enzyme addition. These changes impact the amount and quality of lignin residue, the valorization of which is another key component of a sustainable bioeconomy [64]. Experiments in LCB imaging, simulation, and engineering can also reveal bottlenecks in enzymatic hydrolysis and inform the best use of MFCs in an innovative deconstruction pipeline.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Numbers DE-SC0018409 and DE-FC02-07ER64494. EG and NK were supported by the UW-Madison Biotechnology Training Program (NIH 5 T32 GM008349).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

  • 1. •.Chandel AK, Garlapati VK, Singh AK, Antunes FAF, da Silva SS: The path forward for lignocellulose biorefineries: bottlenecks, solutions, and perspective on commercialization. Bioresour Technol 2018, 264:370–381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Review of the technical and commercial concerns involved in running a lignocellulose biorefinery.
  • 2.Naidu DS, Hlangothi SP, John MJ: Bio-based products from xylan: a review. Carbohydr Polym 2018, 179:28–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Oke MA, Annuar MSM, Simarani K: Mixed feedstock approach to lignocellulosic ethanol production-prospects and limitations. BioEnergy Res 2016, 9:1189–1203. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B: The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D490–D495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aspeborg H, Coutinho PM, Wang Y, Brumer H, Henrissat B: Evolution, substrate specificity and subfamily classification of glycoside hydrolase family 5 (GH5). BMC Evol Bio 2012, 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu J, Tsai C, Liu J, Cheng K, Cheng C: The catalytic domain of a Piromyces rhizinflata cellulase expressed in Escherichia coli was stabilized by the linker peptide of the enzyme. Enzyme Microb Technol 2001, 28:582–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang L, Ding M, Bao L, Chen Y, Zhou J, Lu H: Characterization of a bifunctional xylanase/endoglucanase from yak rumen microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90:1933–1942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghatge SS, Telke AA, Kang SH, Arulalapperumal V, Lee KW, Govindwar SP, Um Y, Oh DB, Shin HD, Kim SW: Characterization of modular bifunctional processive endoglucanase Cel5 from Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:4421–4435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yuan SF, Wu TH, Lee HL, Hsieh HY, Lin WL, Yang B, Chang CK, Li Q, Gao J, Huang CH et al. : Biochemical characterization and structural analysis of a bifunctional cellulase/xylanase from Clostridium thermocellum. J Biol Chem 2015, 290:5739–5748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rattu G, Joshi S, Satyanarayana T: Bifunctional recombinant cellulase-xylanase (rBhcell-xyl) from the polyextremophilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans TSLV1 and its utility in valorization of renewable agro-residues. Extremophiles 2016, 20:831–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tan H, Miao R, Liu T, Yang L, Yang Y, Chen C, Lei J, Li Y, He J, Sun Q et al. : A bifunctional cellulase-xylanase of a new Chryseobacterium strain isolated from the dung of a straw-fed cattle. Microb Biotechnol 2018, 11:381–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Han C, Yang R, Sun Y, Liu M, Zhou L, Li D: Identification and characterization of a novel hyperthermostable bifunctional cellobiohydrolase-xylanase enzyme for synergistic effect with commercial cellulase on pretreated wheat straw degradation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020, 8:296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. ••.Liang PH, Lin WL, Hsieh HY, Lin TY, Chen CH, Tewary SK, Lee HL, Yuan SF, Yang B, Yao JY et al. : A flexible loop for mannan recognition and activity enhancement in a bifunctional glycoside hydrolase family 5. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018, 1862:513–521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Study showing that a single loop insertion can confer broader substrate tolerance to a model GH5, and that further mutating the loop can increase catalytic rate on all substrates.
  • 14. •.Chen ZW, Friedland GD, Pereira JH, Reveco SA, Chan R, Park JI, Thelen MP, Adams PD, Arkin AP, Keasling JD et al. : Tracing determinants of dual substrate specificity in glycoside hydrolase family 5. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:25335–25343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Study identifying active site sequence motif conferring dual cellulase-mannanase activity in a GH5 endoglucanase.
  • 15. ••.Glasgow EM, Vander Meulen KA, Takasuka TE, Bianchetti CM, Bergeman LF, Deutsch S, Fox BG: Extent and origins of functional diversity in a subfamily of glycoside hydrolases. J Mol Biol 2019, 431:1217–1233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Study showing that subfamily 4 of GH5 forms three distinct clades, and that the subfamily possesses conserved residues that correlate with broad specificity and increased activity.
  • 16.Palackal N, Lyon CS, Zaidi S, Luginbuhl P, Dupree P, Goubet F, Macomber JL, Short JM, Hazlewood GP, Robertson DE et al. : A multifunctional hybrid glycosyl hydrolase discovered in an uncultured microbial consortium from ruminant gut. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 74:113–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chu YD, Tu T, Penttinen L, Xue XL, Wang XY, Yi ZL, Gong L, Rouvinen J, Luo HY, Hakulinen N et al. : Insights into the roles of non-catalytic residues in the active site of a GH10 xylanase with activity on cellulose. J Biol Chem 2017, 292:19315–19327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shi P, Tian J, Yuan T, Liu X, Huang H, Bai Y, Yang P, Chen X, Wu N, Yao B: Paenibacillus sp. strain E18 bifunctional xylanase-glucanase with a single catalytic domain. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:3620–3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang YW, Bai Y, Shu T, Fan P, Zhang HS, Turunen O, Xiong HR, Yu LJ: Characterization of a versatile glycoside hydrolase Cel5M from Pectobacterium carotovorum HG-49 for ramie degumming. Text Res J 2020, 90:1602–1615. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dorival J, Ruppert S, Gunnoo M, Orlowski A, Chapelais-Baron M, Dabin J, Labourel A, Thompson D, Michel G, Czjzek M et al. : The laterally acquired GH5 ZgEngAGH5_4 from the marine bacterium Zobellia galactanivorans is dedicated to hemicellulose hydrolysis. Biochem J 2018, 475:3609–3628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meng DD, Liu X, Dong S, Wang YF, Ma XQ, Zhou HX, Wang XQ, Yao LS, Feng YG, Li FL: Structural insights into the substrate specificity of a glycoside hydrolase family 5 lichenase from Caldicellulosiruptor sp. F32. Biochem J 2017, 474:3373–3389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Attia MA, Nelson CE, Offen WA, Jain N, Davies GJ, Gardner JG, Brumer H: In vitro and in vivo characterization of three Cellvibrio japonicus glycoside hydrolase family 5 members reveals potent xyloglucan backbone-cleaving functions. Biotechnol Biofuels 2018, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shelomi M, Heckel DG, Pauchet Y: Ancestral gene duplication enabled the evolution of multifunctional cellulases in stick insects (Phasmatodea). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2016, 71:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shelomi M, Wipfler B, Zhou X, Pauchet Y: Multifunctional cellulase enzymes are ancestral in Polyneoptera. Insect Mol Biol 2020, 29:124–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Glasgow EM, Kemna EI, Bingman CA, Ing NL, Deng K, Bianchetti CM, Takasuka TE, Northen TR, Fox BG: A structural and kinetic survey of GH5_4 endoglucanases reveals determinants of broad substrate specificity and opportunities for biomass hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 2020 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015328.Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Patel AB, Patel AK, Shah MP, Parikh IK, Joshi CG: Isolation and characterization of novel multifunctional recombinant family 26 glycoside hydrolase from Mehsani buffalo rumen metagenome. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2016, 63:257–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anasontzis GE, Lebrun MH, Haon M, Champion C, Kohler A, Lenfant N, Martin F, O’Connell RJ, Riley R, Grigoriev IV et al. : Broad-specificity GH131 beta-glucanases are a hallmark of fungi and oomycetes that colonize plants. Environ Microbiol 2019, 21:2724–2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xia W, Liu P, Liu J: Advance in chitosan hydrolysis by non-specific cellulases. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:6751–6762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Walker JA, Takasuka TE, Deng K, Bianchetti CM, Udell HS, Prom BM, Kim H, Adams PD, Northen TR, Fox BG: Multifunctional cellulase catalysis targeted by fusion to different carbohydrate-binding modules. Biotechnol Biofuels 2015, 8:220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walker JA, Pattathil S, Bergeman LF, Beebe ET, Deng K, Mirzai M, Northen TR, Hahn MG, Fox BG: Determination of glycoside hydrolase specificities during hydrolysis of plant cell walls using glycome profiling. Biotechnol Biofuels 2017, 10:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Montanier C, Money VA, Pires VM, Flint JE, Pinheiro BA, Goyal A, Prates JA, Izumi A, Stalbrand H, Morland C et al. : The active site of a carbohydrate esterase displays divergent catalytic and noncatalytic binding functions. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. •.Kmezik C, Bonzom C, Olsson L, Mazurkewich S, Larsbrink J: Multimodular fused acetyl-feruloyl esterases from soil and gut Bacteroidetes improve xylanase depolymerization of recalcitrant biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 2020, 13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Study showing synergistic effects between domains of a multidomain carbohydrate esterase, and that carbohydrate esterase activity improves GH hydrolysis of xylan and xylan-rich biomass.
  • 33.Srikrishnan S, Chen W, Da Silva NA: Functional assembly and characterization of a modular xylanosome for hemicellulose hydrolysis in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013, 110:275–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bolam DN, Xie HF, White P, Simpson PJ, Hancock SM, Williamson MP, Gilbert HJ: Evidence for synergy between family 2b carbohydrate binding modules in Cellulomonas fimi xylanase 11A. Biochemistry 2001, 40:2468–2477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang RN, Yang JS, Jang JM, Liu JW, Zhang Y, Liu L, Yuan HL: Efficient ferulic acid and xylo-oligosaccharides production by a novel multi-modular bifunctional xylanase/feruloyl esterase using agricultural residues as substrates. Bioresour Technol 2020, 297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Santos CA, Ferreira-Filho JA, O’Donovan A, Gupta VK, Tuohy MG, Souza AP: Production of a recombinant swollenin from Trichoderma harzianum in Escherichia coli and its potential synergistic role in biomass degradation. Microb Cell Fact 2017, 16:83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakatani Y, Yamada R, Ogino C, Kondo A: Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microb Cell Fact 2013, 12:66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Levasseur A, Saloheimo M, Navarro D, Andberg M, Monot F, Nakari-Setala T, Asther M, Record E: Production of a chimeric enzyme tool associating the Trichoderma reesei swollenin with the Aspergillus niger feruloyl esterase A for release of ferulic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 73:872–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang W, Liu C, Qu M, Pan K, OuYang K, Song X, Zhao X: Construction and characterization of a chimeric enzyme of swollenin and xylanase to improve soybean straw hydrolysis. Int J Biol Macromol 2020, 156:558–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nakashima K, Endo K, Shibasaki-Kitakawa N, Yonemoto T: A fusion enzyme consisting of bacterial expansin and endoglucanase for the degradation of highly crystalline cellulose. RSC Adv 2014, 4:43815–43820. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. •.Vermaas JV, Kont R, Beckham GT, Crowley MF, Gudmundsson M, Sandgren M, Stahlberg J, Valjamae P, Knott BC: The dissociation mechanism of the processive cellulase TrCel7A. Biophys J 2020, 118:531a–532a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Study reporting the molecular mechanism for the rate limiting step of cellulose dissociation of a processive cellulase.
  • 42.Cruys-Bagger N, Tatsumi H, Ren GR, Borch K, Westh P: Transient kinetics and rate-limiting steps for the processive cellobiohydrolase Cel7A: effects of substrate structure and carbohydrate binding domain. Biochemistry 2013, 52:8938–8948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. ••.Wu S, Wu S: Processivity and the mechanisms of processive endoglucanases. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2020, 190:448–463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Review of processive endoglucanases; their possible mechanisms, application, and products.
  • 44.Wu B, Zheng S, Pedroso MM, Guddat LW, Chang S, He B, Schenk G: Processivity and enzymatic mechanism of a multifunctional family 5 endoglucanase from Bacillus subtilis BS-5 with potential applications in the saccharification of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels 2018, 11:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. •.Li XQ, Xia JL, Zhu XY, Bilal M, Tan ZB, Shi H: Construction and characterization of bifunctional cellulases: Caldicellulosiruptor-sourced endoglucanase, CBM, and exoglucanase for efficient degradation of lignocellulose. Biochem Eng J 2019, 151 [Google Scholar]; Study characterizing various endoglucanase, exoglucanase, and CBM fusions that possessed higher activities toward microcrystalline cellulose than the parent enzymes.
  • 46.Nath P, Dhillon A, Kumar K, Sharma K, Jamaldheen SB, Moholkar VS, Goyal A: Development of bi-functional chimeric enzyme (CtGH1-L1-CtGH5-F194A) from endoglucanase (CtGH5) mutant F194A and beta-1,4-glucosidase (CtGH1) from Clostridium thermocellum with enhanced activity and structural integrity. Bioresour Technol 2019, 282:494–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brunecky R, Subramanian V, Yarbrough JM, Donohoe BS, Vinzant TB, Vanderwall TA, Knott BC, Chaudhari YB, Bomble YJ, Himmel ME et al. : Synthetic fungal multifunctional cellulases for enhanced biomass conversion. Green Chem 2020, 22:478–489. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sajjad M, Khan IM, Zafar R, Ahmad S, Niazi UHK, Akhtar MW: Influence of positioning of carbohydrate binding module on the activity of endoglucanase CelA of Clostridium thermocellum. J Biotechnol 2012, 161:206–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. •.Lee LL, Crosby JR, Rubinstein GM, Laemthong T, Bing RG, Straub CT, Adams MWW, Kelly RM: The biology and biotechnology of the genus Caldicellulosiruptor: recent developments in’ Caldi World’. Extremophiles 2020, 24:1–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Review of advances in Caldicellulosiruptor research and genetic tools.
  • 50. •.Conway JM, Crosby JR, Hren AP, Southerland RT, Lee LL, Lunin VV, Alahuhta P, Himmel ME, Bomble YJ, Adams MWW et al. : Novel multidomain, multifunctional glycoside hydrolases from highly lignocellulolytic Caldicellulosiruptor species. AIChE J 2018, 64:4218–4228 [Google Scholar]; Study of four novel multidomain, multifunctional GHs from different organisms in the Caldicellulosiruptor genus which act synergistically in degrading biomass.
  • 51. ••.Brunecky R, Alahuhta M, Xu Q, Donohoe BS, Crowley MF, Kataeva IA, Yang SJ, Resch MG, Adams MWW, Lunin VV et al. : Revealing nature’s cellulase diversity: the digestion mechanism of Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA. Science 2013, 342:1513–1516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A founding report of the Type III multifunctional property in a cellulase.
  • 52.Brunecky R, Donohoe BS, Yarbrough JM, Mittal A, Scott BR, Ding HS, Taylor LE, Russell JF, Chung DW, Westpheling J et al. : The multi domain Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA cellulase excels at the hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. Sci Rep 2017, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chung D, Young J, Bomble YJ, Vander Wall TA, Groom J, Himmel ME, Westpheling J: Homologous expression of the Caldicellulosiruptor bescii CelA reveals that the extracellular protein is glycosylated. PLoS One 2015, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li J, Gu X, Pan A: Multifunctional alpha-amylase Amy19 possesses agarase, carrageenase, and cellulase activities. Int J Biol Macromol 2019, 126:585–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Park SH, Lee CR, Hong SK: Implications of agar and agarase in industrial applications of sustainable marine biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Komor RS, Romero PA, Xie CB, Arnold FH: Highly thermostable fungal cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) engineered using predictive methods. Protein Eng Des Sel 2012, 25:827–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zheng F, Tu T, Wang XY, Wang Y, Ma R, Su XY, Xie XM, Yao B, Luo HY: Enhancing the catalytic activity of a novel GH5 cellulase GtCel5 from Gloeophyllum trabeum CBS 900.73 by site-directed mutagenesis on loop 6. Biotechnol Biofuels 2018, 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ferrer M, Ghazi A, Beloqui A, Vieites JM, Lopez-Cortes N, Marin-Navarro J, Nechitaylo TY, Guazzaroni ME, Polaina J, Waliczek A et al. : Functional metagenomics unveils a multifunctional glycosyl hydrolase from the family 43 catalysing the breakdown of plant polymers in the calf rumen. PLoS One 2012, 7:e38134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maruthamuthu M, Jimenez DJ, Stevens P, van Elsas JD: A multi-substrate approach for functional metagenomics-based screening for (hemi)cellulases in two wheat straw-degrading microbial consortia unveils novel thermoalkaliphilic enzymes. BMC Genomics 2016, 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Geddes BA, Mendoza-Suarez MA, Poole PS: A Bacterial Expression Vector Archive (BEVA) for flexible modular assembly of golden gate-compatible vectors. Front Microbiol 2018, 9:3345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Maervoet VET, Briers Y: Synthetic biology of modular proteins. Bioengineered 2017, 8:196–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rizk M, Antranikian G, Elleuche S: Influence of linker length variations on the biomass-degrading performance of heat-active enzyme chimeras. Mol Biotechnol 2016, 58:268–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. •.Chung D, Sarai NS, Knott BC, Hengge N, Russell JF, Yarbrough JM, Brunecky R, Young J, Supekar N, Wall TV et al. : Glycosylation is vital for industrial performance of hyperactive cellulases. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2019, 7:4792–4800 [Google Scholar]; Study finding that CelA glycosylation is important for insoluble substrate hydrolysis and enzyme stability.
  • 64. •.Liu ZH, Le RK, Kosa M, Yang B, Yuan JS, Ragauskas AJ: Identifying and creating pathways to improve biological lignin valorization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019, 105:349–362 [Google Scholar]; Review of lignin valorization, and the challenges of industrial application from a metabolic engineering and systems biology perspective.

RESOURCES