Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Jul 17;13(7):e16441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16441

Short-Term Outcomes After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Octogenarians: A Matched Analysis

John Carney 1, Erik Gerlach 1,, Mark A Plantz 1, Colin Cantrell 1, Peter R Swiatek 2, Jeremy S Marx 1, Guido Marra 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8367019  PMID: 34422472

Abstract

Introduction

Studies have shown that the use of total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing every year in the United Stated at a rate higher than that of total hip or total knee arthroplasty. As the population of the United States continues to age, it is becoming more important for surgeons to understand the true impact of age on outcomes and complications following procedures such a total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if octogenarians have poorer outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to a younger, matched control group.

Methods

Data was obtained through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS NSQIP). Patients who had undergone total shoulder arthroplasty were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code (23472). Indication for arthroplasty was determined by ICD9/10 code (osteoarthritis, fracture, other). Each octogenarian was matched 1:1 to a non-octogenarian based on sex, BMI, ASA class, medical comorbidities, functional status, and surgical indication for arthroplasty by propensity scoring. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between only those patients who underwent TSA for osteoarthritis.Outcomes of interest were assessed between the two groups for statistical significance using a chi-squared test or fisher exact test for expected values of less than 5. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

After matching, octogenarians were found to be at higher risk of readmission (4.7% vs. 3.3%, p=0.046), non-home discharge (27.1% vs. 9.4%, p<0.001), and overall surgical (4.4% vs. 2.5%, p=0.006) and medical complications (3.7% vs. 2.4%, p=0.039). In the setting of TSA for osteoarthritis only, however, octogenarians were only at higher risk for non-home discharge (22.4% vs. 7.5%, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Octogenarians are at higher risk of some complications following total shoulder arthroplasty but fewer than has been previously reported, particularly in the setting of arthroplasty for the treatment of arthritis.

Keywords: octogenarian, total shoulder arthroplasty, outcomes, risk factors, osteoarthritis, complications

Introduction

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been well established as an efficacious and valid treatment modality for a myriad of glenohumeral joint pathologies [1-4]. The incidence of TSA has been growing annually in the United States and has currently outpaced that of total hip or total knee arthroplasty [5]. TSA is performed using one of two techniques. The first is the anatomic TSA technique which employs implants resembling native shoulder anatomy. The second being the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) technique that can function in the setting of rotator cuff insufficiency. This approach utilizes implants that places the ball component on the glenoid and the socket component to the proximal humerus [6]. A vast body of evidence shows that both TSA techniques have better radiographic and patient reported outcomes in comparison to other surgical treatment modalities for conditions such as proximal humerus fractures and glenohumeral arthritis [2,3,7-9].

While TSA can provide excellent outcomes for patients with a variety of glenohumeral pathologies, the procedure is not risk free. Periprosthetic fracture, implant failure, peri-operative medical complications and infection are all serious complications of TSA that can lead to reoperation, diminished functional results, or even death if not managed in a timely and appropriate manner [10,11]. Hence, it is crucial that surgeons be meticulous in selecting appropriate patients for TSA and remain aware of risk factors for poor outcomes and complications.

Age has often been identified as a risk factor for complication throughout the orthopaedic literature [11-14]. However, this risk factor is non-modifiable, and with an aging population in the United States, there is a need for surgeons to better understand the impact of age on orthopaedic outcomes. This is particularly true in the setting of arthroplasty, which typically is performed in older populations. Octogenarians (i.e. individuals of age 80 or older) have been the subject of numerous outcome studies in arthroplasty which have shown this group to be at a higher risk of complication [11-13,15,16]. The purpose of this study was to determine if octogenarians have poorer outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to a younger, matched control group.

Materials and methods

Data was obtained through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS NSQIP). This database is collected by a group of trained surgical clinical reviewers, who record perioperative data at over 700 hospitals across the United States, including International Classification of Disease 9th and/or 10th Revisions (ICD-9, ICD-10) codes, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and data related to discharge disposition, reoperations, readmissions, and mortality through 30 days postoperatively [17]. This database is considered among the most precise and accurate database available for measuring patient outcomes after surgery given its high rate of complete data sets, operative data points, validation, and inter-rater reliability [18].

Patients who had undergone total shoulder arthroplasty were identified by CPT code (23472). Indication for arthroplasty was determined by ICD9/10 code (osteoarthritis, fracture, other). Patients were divided into two groups: octogenarians (80+ years old) and control (age 65-79). Both elective and non-elective procedures were included.

For the control group, each octogenarian was matched 1:1 to a non-octogenarian based on sex, BMI, ASA class, medical comorbidities, functional status, and surgical indication for arthroplasty. Matching was performed using propensity scoring. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between only those patients who underwent TSA for a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

Outcomes of interest included return to the operating room, readmission, reoperation, non-home discharge, mortality, surgical complications (superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, dehiscence, bleeding), medical complications (wound infection, pneumonia, reintubation, failure to wean intubation, pulmonary embolism, renal insufficiency, renal failure, urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular accident, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, deep venous thromboembolism, systemic sepsis, and septic shock). Differences in these outcomes were assessed between the two groups for statistical significance using a chi-squared test or fisher exact test for expected values of less than 5. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All statistical calculations were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (Armonk, NY; IBM Corp).

Results

A total of 8,382 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 1,625 were octogenarians (mean age +/- SD) while the other 6,757 were aged 65-79 (mean age +/- SD). Prior to matching, the octogenarian group had lower rates of obesity (35.1% vs. 51.2%, p<0.001), diabetes (15.9% vs. 20.1%, p<0.001), and smoking (2.8% vs. 7.2%, p<0.001). The octogenarian group had higher rates of COPD (8.7% vs 6.9%, p=0.012), CHF (1.2% vs 0.6%, p=0.004), hypertension (78.2% vs 71.1%, p<0.001), bleeding disorders (4.4% vs 2.4%, p<0.001), and transfusions within 48 hours of surgery (0.7% vs 0.2%, p=0.001). They were also less likely to be functionally independent (94.6% vs 97.5%, p<0.001) and belong to an ASA class of 3 or greater (64.6% vs 56.1%, p<0.001). Lastly, octogenarians were more likely to undergo shoulder arthroplasty for fracture (11.6% vs. 5.8%, p<0.001) than osteoarthritis (48.3% vs 55.0%, p<0.001) compared to the control group (p<0.05). Findings are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographics, patient variables, comorbidities, and surgical indication prior to matching .

  65-79 years old 80+ years old p
[n = 6,757] [n = 1,625]
Sex          
    Male 2,827 41.80% 512 31.50% <0.001
    Female 3,930 58.20% 1,113 68.50%  
BMI (kg/m2)
      Underweight 82 1.20% 29 1.80% 0.071
      Normal 1,012 15.00% 396 24.40% <0.001
      Overweight 2,205 32.60% 630 38.80% <0.001
      Obese Class I 1,796 26.60% 393 24.20% 0.048
      Obese Class II 944 14.00% 122 7.50% <0.001
      Obese Class III 718 10.60% 55 3.40% <0.001
Comorbidities
     Diabetes 1,359 20.10% 259 15.90% <0.001
     Smoking 486 7.20% 45 2.80% <0.001
     COPD 468 6.90% 142 8.70% 0.012
     Congestive Heart Failure 38 0.60% 20 1.20% 0.004
     Hypertension 4,801 71.10% 1,270 78.20% <0.001
     Renal Failure 5 0.10% 0 0.00% 0.591
     Chronic Steroid Use 342 5.10% 75 4.60% 0.458
     Bleeding Disorder 162 2.40% 72 4.40% <0.001
     Transfusion within 48 hours 12 0.20% 11 0.70% 0.001
Functional Status
      Independent 6,591 97.50% 1,538 94.60% <0.001
      Non-independent 166 2.50% 87 5.40%  
Surgical Indication
      Fracture 389 5.80% 189 11.60% <0.001
      Osteoarthritis 3,717 55.00% 785 48.30% <0.001
      Other 2,651 39.20% 651 40.10% 0.54
ASA Class
     Class 1 (No disturbance) 71 1.10% 3 0.20% <0.001
     Class 2 (Mild disturbance) 2,704 40.00% 499 30.70% <0.001
     Class 3 (Severe disturbance) 3,788 56.10% 1,050 64.60% <0.001
     Class 4+ (Life threatening) 186 2.80% 70 4.30% 0.001

Prior to matching, the octogenarian group had higher rates of readmission (5.2% vs 2.8%, p<0.001), non-home discharge (30.0% vs 9.9%, p<0.001), mortality (0.5% vs 0.1%, p<0.001), surgical complications (5.4% vs 2.4%, p<0.001), and medical complications (3.9% vs 2.1%, p<0.001). Regarding surgical complications specifically, the octogenarians had higher rates of bleeding (5.4% vs. 2.0%, p<0.001). Regarding medical complications, specifically, the octogenarians had higher rates of pneumonia (1.0% vs 0.5%, p=0.024), reintubation (0.5% vs. 0.2%, p=0.029), failure to wean intubation (0.4% vs 0.1%, p=0.007), pulmonary embolism (0.6% vs 0.3%, p=0.020), urinary tract infection (UTI) (1.5% vs 0.6%, p<0.001), cardiac arrest (0.2% vs 0.0%, p=0.015), and DVT (0.6% vs 0.3%, p=0.029). Findings are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. 30-day outcome measures and complication rates prior to matching .

  65-79 years old 80+ years old p
[n = 6,757] [n = 1,625]
Return to OR 82 1.20% 26 1.60% 0.215
Readmission 191 2.80% 85 5.20% <0.001
Reoperation 82 1.20% 26 1.60% 0.215
Non-home discharge 671 9.90% 488 30.00% <0.001
Mortality 6 0.10% 8 0.50% <0.001
Surgical Complications
            Overall 161 2.40% 88 5.40% <0.001
            Superficial surgical site infection 10 0.10% 1 0.10% 0.703
            Deep surgical site infection 12 0.20% 1 0.10% 0.484
            Dehiscence 1 0.00% 0 0.00% >0.999
            Bleeding 138 2.00% 87 5.40% <0.001
 Medical Complications
            Overall 144 2.10% 64 3.90% <0.001
      Wound infection 3 0.00% 0 0.00% >0.999
      Pneumonia 34 0.50% 16 1.00% 0.024
      Reintubation 13 0.20% 8 0.50% 0.029
      Failure to wean intubation 6 0.10% 6 0.40% 0.007
      Pulmonary embolism 17 0.30% 10 0.60% 0.02
      Renal insufficiency 5 0.10% 2 0.10% 0.627
      Renal failure 2 0.00% 2 0.10% 0.171
      Urinary tract infection 41 0.60% 25 1.50% <0.001
      Cerebrovascular accident 6 0.10% 3 0.20% 0.389
      Cardiac arrest 2 0.00% 4 0.20% 0.015
      Myocardial infarction 23 0.30% 6 0.40% 0.859
      Deep venous thromboembolism 18 0.30% 10 0.60% 0.029
      Systemic sepsis 10 0.10% 5 0.30% 0.171
      Septic shock 2 0.00% 3 0.20% 0.053

Propensity scoring resulted in the groups being well matched (p>0.99 for all demographic and preoperative metrics) (Table 3). Compared to the matched control group, octogenarians continued to demonstrate significantly higher rates of readmission (4.7% vs. 3.3%, p=0.046) and non-home discharge (27.1% vs 9.4%, p<0.001). They also continued to demonstrate higher rates of overall surgical complications (4.4% vs 2.5%, p=0.006) and bleeding (4.3% vs 2.2%, p=0.001) as well as overall medical complications (3.7% vs 2.4%, p=0.039). However, they no longer demonstrated statistically different rates of mortality or any specific medical complication (Table 4). Subgroup analysis of octogenarians undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis only demonstrated a significantly higher rate of non-home discharge (22.4% vs 7.5%, p<0.001) (Table 5).

Table 3. Demographics, patient variables, comorbidities, and surgical indication after matching .

  65-79 years old 80+ years old p
[n = 1,434] [n = 1,434]
Sex          
    Male 454 31.70% 454 31.70% >0.999
    Female 980 68.30% 980 68.30%  
BMI (kg/m2)
      Underweight 16 1.10% 16 1.10% >0.999
      Normal 328 22.90% 328 22.90% >0.999
      Overweight 575 40.10% 575 40.10% >0.999
      Obese Class I 355 24.80% 355 24.80% >0.999
      Obese Class II 112 7.80% 112 7.80% >0.999
      Obese Class III 48 3.30% 48 3.30% >0.999
Comorbidities
     Diabetes 222 15.50% 222 15.50% >0.999
     Smoker 33 2.30% 33 2.30% >0.999
     COPD 91 6.30% 91 6.30% >0.999
     Congestive Heart Failure 1 0.10% 1 0.10% >0.999
     Hypertension 1,127 78.60% 1,127 78.60% >0.999
     Renal Failure 0 0.00% 0 0.00% >0.999
     Chronic Steroid Use 47 3.30% 47 3.30% >0.999
     Bleeding Disorder 35 2.40% 35 2.40% >0.999
     Transfusion within 48 hours 1 0.10% 1 0.10% >0.999
Functional status
      Independent 1,404 97.90% 1,404 97.90% >0.999
      Non-independent 30 2.10% 30 2.10% >0.999
Surgical Indication
      Fracture 119 8.30% 119 8.30% >0.999
      Osteoarthritis 731 51.00% 731 51.00% >0.999
      Other 584 40.70% 584 40.70% >0.999
ASA Class
     Class 1 (No disturbance) 3 0.20% 3 0.20% >0.999
     Class 2 (Mild disturbance) 471 32.80% 471 32.80% >0.999
     Class 3 (Severe disturbance) 937 65.30% 937 65.30% >0.999
     Class 4+ (Life threatening) 23 1.60% 23 1.60% >0.999

Table 4. 30-day outcome measures and complication rates after matching .

  65-79 years old 80+ years old p
[n = 1,434] [n = 1,434]
Return to OR 19 1.30% 22 1.50% 0.637
Readmission 47 3.30% 68 4.70% 0.046
Reoperation 19 1.30% 22 1.50% 0.637
Non-home discharge 135 9.40% 389 27.10% <0.001
Mortality 1 0.10% 6 0.40% 0.125
Surgical Complications
            Overall 36 2.50% 63 4.40% 0.006
            Superficial surgical site infection 2 0.10% 1 0.10% >0.999
            Deep surgical site infection 3 0.20% 1 0.10% 0.625
            Dehiscence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% – 
            Bleeding 31 2.20% 62 4.30% 0.001
 Medical Complications
            Overall 34 2.40% 53 3.70% 0.039
      Wound infection 0 0.00% 0 0.00% – 
      Pneumonia 8 0.60% 13 0.90% 0.273
      Reintubation 4 0.30% 7 0.50% 0.548
      Failure to wean intubation 2 0.10% 6 0.40% 0.288
      Pulmonary embolism 3 0.20% 9 0.60% 0.145
      Renal insufficiency 1 0.10% 2 0.10% >0.999
      Renal failure 0 0.00% 2 0.10% 0.5
      Urinary tract infection 10 0.70% 20 1.40% 0.066
      Cerebrovascular accident 1 0.10% 3 0.20% 0.625
      Cardiac arrest 0 0.00% 3 0.20% 0.25
      Myocardial infarction 6 0.40% 5 0.30% 0.763
      Deep venous thromboembolism 2 0.10% 8 0.60% 0.109
      Systemic sepsis 4 0.30% 4 0.30% >0.999
      Septic shock 1 0.10% 3 0.20% 0.625

Table 5. 30-day outcome measures and complication rates after elective rTSA for osteoarthritis: matched comparison .

  65-79 years old 80+ years old p
[n = 731] [n = 731]
Return to OR 8 1.10% 9 1.20% 0.807
Readmission 17 2.30% 22 3.00% 0.417
Reoperation 8 1.10% 9 1.20% 0.807
Non-home discharge 55 7.50% 164 22.40% <0.001
Mortality 0 0.00% 4 0.50% 0.124
Surgical Complications
            Overall 11 1.50% 15 2.10% 0.429
            Superficial surgical site infection 1 0.10% 0 0.00% >0.999
            Deep surgical site infection 1 0.10% 0 0.00% >0.999
            Dehiscence 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
            Bleeding 9 1.20% 15 2.10% 0.217
 Medical Complications
            Overall 15 2.10% 21 2.90% 0.311
      Wound infection 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
      Pneumonia 4 0.50% 4 0.50% >0.999
      Reintubation 1 0.10% 2 0.30% >0.999
      Failure to wean intubation 1 0.10% 3 0.40% 0.624
      Pulmonary embolism 1 0.10% 5 0.70% 0.218
      Renal insufficiency 1 0.10% 2 0.30% >0.999
      Renal failure 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
      Urinary tract infection 5 0.70% 6 0.80% 0.762
      Cerebrovascular accident 1 0.10% 1 0.10% >0.999
      Cardiac arrest 0 0.00% 1 0.10% >0.999
      Myocardial infarction 2 0.30% 2 0.30% >0.999
      Deep venous thromboembolism 0 0.00% 2 0.30% 0.5
      Systemic sepsis 3 0.40% 0 0.00% 0.249
      Septic shock 1 0.10% 1 0.10% >0.999

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to determine if octogenarians have inferior short-term outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty compared to a younger, matched control group. After matching, our data shows that octogenarians are at higher risk of readmission, non-home discharge, and surgical and medical complication. In the setting of TSA for osteoarthritis, however, octogenarians do not have a higher rate of readmission or complication but continue to have higher rates of non-home discharge.

To our knowledge there are two other studies that has investigated TSA in octogenarians. One study similarly found a higher overall complication rate in octogenarians. However, this group also found that octogenarians were at a higher risk of several, specific major and minor complications within 30 days including pulmonary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, reintubation and septic shock [11]. The differences between our results and the aforementioned study are likely due to the fact that the aforementioned study did not create two equal sized groups, but rather compared all TSA patients in the database for a set time period. Like in our sample, the octogenarians and non-octogenarians in this study had several significant differences in demographics and comorbidities. The aforementioned study accounted for these differences by utilizing a logistic regression model whereas our study created a 1:1 matched control group via propensity scoring, which may better account for differences in covariates among two groups and explain why we did not find octogenarians to be at a higher risk for these major complications. The other study also utilized the same database as ours and found that octogenarians were at a higher risk for readmission, pneumonia, and UTI compared to individuals younger than 70 years old. They were not, however, at a higher risk for any complications than individuals aged 70-80 [19].

Several studies have been conducted on octogenarians in the hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty fields that are in agreement with our findings. A recent database study of octogenarians undergoing ankle arthroplasty found the group to be at a higher risk for non-home discharge and longer hospital length of stay but not at an increased risk for higher complication [12]. A 2016 review article that compiled morbidity and mortality data from 11 different studies on hip and knee arthroplasty in octogenarians and nonagenarians concluded that although advanced age patients have more medical comorbidities, these comorbidities do not translate to a higher rate of surgical complication, though some studies did note higher rates of medical complications [20-26]. Although our study did find a higher rate of complications in octogenarians, this finding became statistically insignificant when TSA patients without a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were removed from the dataset, which is likely a more similar patient population to the hip and knee arthroplasty populations. Some studies have found longer lengths of stay in this population following arthroplasty. More recent literature in advanced age patients, however, has not found this to be the case, which can likely be attributed to improved protocols involving co-management of older patients with geriatricians [20,24].

Similar findings have also been found when assessing the revision arthroplasty in octogenarians. A 2007 study investigating outcomes in revision hip arthroplasty patients over the age of 80 compared to a control group found equivalent patient reported outcome scores and no difference in complications other than dislocation, which was higher in the younger control group [27]. A 2018 study investigating total knee arthroplasty in octogenarians compared to a propensity score matched control group found higher rate of blood transfusion and length of stay, but no increases in any other medical or surgical complication nor mortality or readmission [13].

This study has several weaknesses which should be considered when interpreting our findings. First, this study utilizes a database which can be subject to input errors and can only provide a limited number of metrics regarding a patient’s medical care. The database does not provide specific information regarding severity of comorbidities or specific outcomes related to a given procedure. Access to the database is limited to contributing institutions, and the high cost of participation has led to a disproportionate contribution to the NSQIP from large teaching hospitals [18,28]. Second, the database identifies all-cause readmission, not just orthopedic-related readmissions. Third, there are no separate CPT codes for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and thus we are not able to identify whether the groups were equally matched regarding the type of arthroplasty that was performed, or if one form of arthroplasty demonstrated lower complication rates.

This study contributes to the current body of literature as it presents valuable information to surgeons on the increased risk that age alone presents when performing total shoulder arthroplasty, and can help surgeons make appropriate decisions regarding how to care for patients of this age group. Further, a prospective study is warranted to better quantify what factors are predictive of better or poorer outcomes in this population.

Conclusions

Octogenarians are at higher risk of readmission, non-home discharge, and surgical and medical complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. However, this age group is only at risk of non-home discharge when TSA is being performed for the diagnosis of arthritis. This information will assist surgeons with appropriately selecting surgical candidates in their practice and anticipating potential challenges and complications in the early post-operative period.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review. Roberson TA, Bentley JC, Griscom JT, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hawkins RJ, Tokish JM. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26:1298–1306. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:2050–2055. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shoulder replacement surgery for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Craig RS, Goodier H, Singh JA, Hopewell S, Rees JL. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012879.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uncommon indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Hyun YS, Huri G, Garbis NG, McFarland EG. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013;5:243–255. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. Wagner ER, Farley KX, Higgins I, Wilson JM, Daly CA, Gottschalk MB. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29:2601–2609. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Berliner JL, Regalado-Magdos A, Ma CB, Feeley BT. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Decreased reoperations and improved outcomes with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in comparison to hemiarthroplasty for geriatric proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Austin DC, Torchia MT, Cozzolino NH, Jacobowitz LE, Bell JE. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:49–57. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.A cost-effectiveness analysis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for the management of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Osterhoff G, O'Hara NN, D'Cruz J, Sprague SA, Bansback N, Evaniew N, Slobogean GP. Value Health. 2017;20:404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures in the geriatric patient: a review of the literature. Stanbury SJ, Voloshin I. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011;2:181–186. doi: 10.1177/2151458511420140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Analysis of 4063 complications of shoulder arthroplasty reported to the US Food and Drug Administration from 2012 to 2016. Somerson JS, Hsu JE, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:1978–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Total shoulder arthroplasty in octogenarians: Is there a higher risk of adverse outcomes? Newman JM, Stroud SG, Yang A, et al. J Orthop. 2018;15:671–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Short-term outcomes of primary total ankle arthroplasty in octogenarians: a national database analysis. Partan M, Frane N, Iturriaga C, Matai P, Bitterman A. Foot Ankle Spec. 2020:1938640020960546. doi: 10.1177/1938640020960546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Revision total knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: an analysis of 957 cases. Bovonratwet P, Tyagi V, Ottesen TD, Ondeck NT, Rubin LE, Grauer JN. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Risk factors associated with cardiac complication after total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee: a systematic review. Elsiwy Y, Jovanovic I, Doma K, Hazratwala K, Letson H. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1058-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Factors affecting readmission rates following primary total hip arthroplasty. Mednick RE, Alvi HM, Krishnan V, Lovecchio F, Manning DW. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1201–1209. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: results at 10 years. Joshi AB, Markovic L, Gill G. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:295–298. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. [Nov;2020 ];https://www.facs.org/Quality-Programs/ACS-NSQIP. 2020
  • 18.Surgical research using national databases. Alluri RK, Leland H, Heckmann N. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:393. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.10.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elective total shoulder arthroplasty in octogenarians: a safe procedure. Bovonratwet P, Malpani R, Ondeck NT, Tyagi V, Grauer JN. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:145–154. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients older than age 80 years. Rubin LE, Blood TD, Defillo-Draiby JC. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:683–690. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Total hip and knee arthroplasty in nonagenarians. Alfonso DT, Howell RD, Strauss EJ, Di Cesare PE. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:807–811. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Primary knee and hip arthroplasty among nonagenarians and centenarians in the United States. Krishnan E, Fries JF, Kwoh CK. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22888. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1038–1042. doi: 10.1002/art.22888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients aged 80 years or older: influence of co-morbidities on final outcome. de Thomasson E, Caux I, Guingand O, Terracher R, Mazel C. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:249–253. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Are nonagenarians too old for total hip arthroplasty? an evaluation of morbidity and mortality within a total joint replacement registry. Miric A, Inacio MC, Kelly MP, Namba RS. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1324–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Age as an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality after total joint arthroplasty in patients 90 years of age or older. D'Apuzzo MR, Pao AW, Novicoff WM, Browne JA. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:477–480. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clinical outcomes of primary total joint arthroplasty among nonagenarian patients. Petruccelli D, Rahman WA, de Beer J, Winemaker M. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1599–1603. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Revision total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. A case-control study. Parvizi J, Pour AE, Keshavarzi NR, D'Apuzzo M, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2612–2618. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Sheils CR, Dahlke AR, Kreutzer L, Bilimoria KY, Yang AD. Surgery. 2016;160:1182–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES