Abstract
Membrane proteins constitute a substantial fraction of the human proteome, thus representing a vast source of therapeutic drug targets. Indeed, newly devised technologies now allow targeting “undruggable” regions of membrane proteins to modulate protein function in the cell. Despite the advances in technology, the rapid translation of basic science discoveries into potential drug candidates targeting transmembrane protein domains remains challenging. We address this issue by harmonizing single molecule-based and ensemble-based atomistic simulations of ligand–membrane interactions with patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based experiments to gain insights into drug delivery, cellular efficacy, and safety of molecules directed at membrane proteins. In this study, we interrogated the pharmacological activation of the cardiac Ca2+ pump (Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, SERCA2a) in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells as a proof-of-concept model. The combined computational-experimental approach serves as a platform to explain the differences in the cell-based activity of candidates with similar functional profiles, thus streamlining the identification of drug-like candidates that directly target SERCA2a activation in human cardiac cells. Systematic cell-based studies further showed that a direct SERCA2a activator does not induce cardiotoxic pro-arrhythmogenic events in human cardiac cells, demonstrating that pharmacological stimulation of SERCA2a activity is a safe therapeutic approach targeting the heart. Overall, this novel multiscale platform encompasses organ-specific drug potency, efficacy, and safety, and opens new avenues to accelerate the bench-to-patient research aimed at designing effective therapies directed at membrane protein domains.
Subject terms: Drug discovery, Pharmacology, Receptor pharmacology, Membranes, Computational chemistry
Introduction
Membrane proteins are pivotal players in the cell, playing essential biological roles in a variety of functions vital to the survival of organisms, including transport of ions and molecules, signal transduction across cells, serve as scaffolds to help bind the cell to a surface or substrate, and catalyze reactions in biological membranes1,2. Membrane proteins constitute a significant fraction (about 20–30%) of the human proteome3, and these proteins represent more than 60% of the current drug targets4; enzymes, transporters, ion channels, and receptors are all common drug targets. Molecules directed at solvent-accessible pockets have been the primary strategy used to target membrane proteins5; indeed, virtually all therapeutics targeting membrane proteins bind to solvated regions outside the lipid bilayer6. Therefore, membrane protein-based drug discovery has rested on the primary assumptions that transmembrane domains are simply passive structural domains required to anchor membrane proteins to the lipid bilayer and that there are no specific sites and interactions within the transmembrane domains that can be effectively used for drug development. Recent advances in crystallography, spectroscopy and, computational biophysics now challenge this conventional view and show that transmembrane domains actively mediate functional protein–protein interactions and exert modulatory roles in membrane proteins2. The paradigm shift from traditional structural biology to a dynamic view of membrane proteins has enabled the discovery of effector sites located in conventionally undruggable transmembrane regions to modulate protein function6–8. A prime example of a druggable transmembrane protein is the cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2a). SERCA is an ATP-fueled pump that actively transports cytosolic Ca2+ into the sarcoplasmic reticulum during diastole in the heart, relaxing muscle cells and allowing the ventricles to fill with blood9. SERCA2a regulation is critical for maintaining normal heart function, and its pathological dysregulation is a hallmark of heart failure. Consequently, pharmacological stimulation of SERCA2a activity has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy to improve cardiac function10–13. There is extensive evidence indicating that key effector sites are localized in the transmembrane domain of the pump, including regulatory and inhibitory binding sites14. More recently, we have shown that the membrane protein dwarf open reading frame (DWORF) binds to the transmembrane domain of SERCA2a and directly stimulates the activity of the pump15. FRET-based screening assays have also demonstrated that small molecules activate SERCA2a through targeting the transmembrane domain of the pump16. Together, these studies illustrate the importance of SERCA2a as a pharmacological target for heart failure therapy17,18 and a new paradigm for membrane protein-based drug discovery13,19,20.
Membrane permeation is considered the key factor limiting the utility of chemical probes and therapeutic agents21,22, as the suboptimal ability of molecules to penetrate the cell and engage their membrane protein target results in poor efficacy. Nonetheless, it remains unclear whether membrane permeability profiles alone are sufficiently predictive to establish the relationships between target-based potency and cell efficacy of molecules targeting membrane protein domains. Another major limitation preventing the discovery of exogenous agents that can be used as potent probes that target transmembrane protein domains is the use of heterologous expression systems to evaluate cellular efficacy. This issue is of particular importance because small-molecule screening campaigns are often performed using cells that express the foreign target in quantities suitable for high-throughput screening23 but do not necessarily capture organ-specific cellular target engagement in and potential off-target effects24. Therefore, understanding the relationships between target-based potency and cell-based efficacy is of utmost importance to accelerate the discovery and development of biologically active molecules targeting transmembrane protein domains. To address this issue, here we used complementary single-molecule and ensemble-based atomistic simulations of lipid–ligand interaction, in situ enzymatic activity assays, and high-resolution optical mapping using human iPSC-derived cardiac cells to systematically interrogate pharmacological modulation of SERCA2a activation as a model. The result is a comprehensive platform that encompasses drug delivery, target engagement, cellular efficacy, and safety of molecules directed at membrane proteins.
Results and discussion
Target-based potency of small molecules directed at cardiac SERCA2a
In this study, we used only three known allosteric activators directed at the transmembrane domain of SERCA2a (Fig. 1). CDN1163 was reported to activate the housekeeping SERCA2b isoform25, whereas compounds CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960 have been shown to activate cardiac SERCA2a isoform16. It is important to note that other small molecules have been reported to activate SERCA2a; however, these effects are indirect (i.e., through phospholamban binding26, and only CDN1163, CP-154526, and Ro 41-0960 have been characterized as direct SERCA activators16,25,26. Therefore, we first evaluated the activity of these molecules directed at SERCA2a in cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) microsomes isolated from hearts using an NADH-coupled ATPase assay. These ATPase activation assays confirmed that all three molecules stimulate SERCA2a activity with mean half-maximum effective concentration (EC50) values between 0.8 and 27 µM (Table 1). These findings indicate that these molecules are relatively potent toward SERCA2a, with average EC50 values in the low µM range. The small molecules also increase ATPase turnover (Vmax) by 27–38% at a Ca2+ concentration of 10 µM (Table 1); these findings suggest that these SERCA activators stimulate maximal Ca2+ uptake rates in cardiac SR microsomal preparations. Together, these findings support previous studies and demonstrate that molecules CDN1163, CP-154526, and Ro 41-0960 are direct activators of the cardiac SERCA2a pump.
Table 1.
Compound | EC50 (µM)a | ΔVmax (%)a | LogPBLMb | ΔGbind neutral (kcal mol−1)c | ΔGbind ionized (kcal mol−1)c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDN1163 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 27 ± 3 | 2.3 | − 3.4 | – |
CP-154526 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 31 ± 4 | 5.6 | − 8.3 | − 5.1 |
Ro 41-0960 | 27 ± 1.3 | 38 ± 2 | − 5.9 | − 8.8 | − 4.8 |
aValues were obtained from in situ SERCA2a ATPase activity experiments (n = 3); values are reported as mean ± SEM.
bLogPBLM is the permeability coefficient of molecules through the black lipid membrane.
cEstimated from the PMF profile of the umbrella sampling calculations.
Bilayer crossing profiles of SERCA2a activators
Upon establishing the target-based potency of the three activators toward SERCA2a, we used atomistic simulations to evaluate the bilayer-crossing free energy profiles of these molecules. We predict that at physiological pH of 7.1–7.227, CDN1163 is neutral (pKa = 4.0). Conversely, a pKa value of 6.4 calculated for CP-154526 (pKa = 6.4) suggests that this molecule could be either neutral or ionized, whereas Ro 41-0960 (pKa = 5.5) is predominantly charged at physiological pH. Based on these pKa calculations, we computed the POPC bilayer-crossing free energy profiles of the CDN1163 and CP-154526 in their neutral state, and Ro 41-0960 in its ionized state. Additionally, we calculated the free-energy profiles for charged CP-154526 and neutral Ro 41-0960 to account for the uncertainty of the model (Root-mean-square error of 1.1 pKa units)28. The profiles in Fig. 2 highlight the range of energetic barriers possible with different SERCA2a activators and ionization states, with all the umbrella sampling windows provided in Supplementary Fig. S1 (Supplementary Information). All electrically neutral molecules have a small membrane entry barrier from the solution (Fig. 2), but the energy barrier is not considerably affected by ionization, as observed in the bilayer-crossing free energy profiles of electrically charged CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960 (Fig. 2). After crossing this energetic barrier, the compounds reach their preferred penetration depth, either close to the lipid headgroup or the membrane midplane (Fig. 2). Except for the ionized states of CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960, there is a peak for the free energy profile at the center of the bilayer representing the energetic cost of burying the molecules within the bilayer center. Despite these differences, all molecules interact favorably with the lipid bilayer regardless of their ionization state, with free energies of binding (ΔGbind) between − 3.4 and − 8.8 kcal mol−1 (Table 1). More importantly, we found that Ro 41-0960 has a high affinity for the lipid bilayer, in contrast to the predicted negative logP calculated for this molecule (Table 1).
Single-molecule simulations of ligand–membrane interactions
We performed unrestrained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the activators embedded in a POPC bilayer as a complementary approach to evaluate the stability of the ligand–membrane interactions. Figure 3 shows the time-dependent and probability distribution of the vertical position of the molecules in the lipid bilayer, where [Z] = 0 Å denotes the membrane center of mass. In agreement with the bilayer-crossing free energy profiles, unrestrained MD simulations show that the molecules remain bound to the lipid bilayer and localize at the interface between the polar and nonpolar regions of the membrane, e.g., near or below the headgroups of POPC (Fig. 3). The vertical position of the molecules is determined by the charge of the compounds: electrically neutral molecules penetrate deeper into the membrane at distances between 9 and 12 Å from the membrane center of mass, whereas charged molecules localize farther from the center of the lipid bilayer (Fig. 3). For example, CDN1163 binds about 9 Å away from the center of the bilayer, while Ro 41-0960 maintains an average distance of 14 Å from the center of mass of the POPC bilayer and can further localize into the headgroup-water interface (e.g., at t = 25–35 ns, Fig. 3). The unrestrained MD simulations correlate well with PMF calculations and show that both electrically neutral and charged states of Ro 41-0960 remain bound to the lipid bilayer despite carrying a charged nitro group. The qualitative and quantitative agreement between biased and unbiased atomistic simulations implies that these activators interact favorably with a lipid bilayer. The affinity of these molecules for the lipid bilayer supports the concept that these effectors activate SERCA2a by interacting with the transmembrane domain of the protein.
In addition to the localization in the lipid bilayer, another important variable to consider is the translocation of the small molecules across the membrane. This is especially important for targets localized in intracellular compartments, including the sarcoplasmic reticulum where SERCA2a is found. Lipid-bilayer crossing free-energy profiles show that electrically neutral CP-154526, Ro 41-0960, and to a certain extent CDN1163 can translocate freely across the lipid bilayer. Analysis of the unbiased MD trajectories showed that electrically neutral CP-154526 undergoes a single spontaneous exchange event between membrane leaflets (i.e., at t = 275 ns, Fig. 3). Although the PMF profiles of electrically neutral Ro 41-0960 and CDN1163 indicate that these molecules can cross the membrane, we did not observe leaflet exchange of this molecule in the timescales studied here.
Ensemble-based atomistic simulations of ligand–membrane provide unique insights into ligand–membrane interactions
We performed ensemble-based MD atomistic simulations29 as a complementary approach to better capture the behavior of SERCA2a activators in a lipid–water environment and in real-time. We found that the ensemble-based simulations capture the spontaneous insertion of small molecules into the membrane (Fig. 4) observed in the single-molecule trajectories. For example, the maximum relative density of CDN1163 in the lipid bilayer occurs at 11–12 Å from the center of the bilayer, whereas electrically charged Ro 41-0960 resides primarily at ~ 14 Å from the center of the bilayer (Fig. 4). The relative density profiles of the CP-154526, especially in its electrically charged state, are also in good qualitative and quantitative agreement with unbiased single-molecule MD simulations (Fig. 3). The reproducibility of ligand–membrane interactions across different MD approaches validates the ensemble-based simulations as an approach to gain further insights into the behavior of small molecules in a lipid–water environment.
While the ensemble-based and single molecule-based trajectories are in general quantitative and qualitative agreement, the former revealed unique differences in the ligand–ligand and ligand–protein profiles among SERCA2a activators. We found that the 10 molecules of CDN1163 simulated in the lipid–water system bind to the lipid bilayer at t = 170 ns and remain bound to the membrane for the remainder of the simulation time (Fig. 4A). In contrast with the favorable ligand–lipid interaction single-molecule profiles of CP-154526 (Figs. 1, 2), ensemble-based simulations showed that this molecule has a strong preference for the aqueous phase of the system (Fig. 4B,C). Surprisingly, the preference for the aqueous phase is more pronounced in the electrically neutral state of the molecule, where only 10–20% of the CP-154526 molecules transfer to the lipid bilayer (Fig. 4B). More importantly, we found that electrically neutral CP-154526 aggregates in the aqueous phase (Fig. 4B), although ionization partially mitigates this effect (Fig. 4C). Finally, MD simulations of Ro 41-0960 showed that all 10 molecules bind to the lipid bilayer at t = 40 ns for the electrically neutral molecule and t = 140 ns for the electrically charged form of the ligand; as in CDN1193, Ro 41-0960 remains bound to the lipid bilayer in both trajectories. We found that this behavior is consistent across ionization states, thus indicating that changes in ionization state do not affect the ability of Ro 41-0960 to associate with the lipid bilayer.
In addition to the differences in ligand–ligand and ligand–lipid interactions observed in the ensemble-based simulations, a notable discovery made here is the clear differences in ligand translocation profiles across the lipid bilayer that are not entirely captured by single-molecule simulations. Specifically, the density profile of CDN1163 shows an increase in the relative density of this molecule around the center of the lipid bilayer ([Z] = 0 Å, Fig. 4A), suggesting that this molecule penetrates across the lipid bilayer in the time scales used in this study. Similarly, electrically neutral CP-154526 penetrates across the membrane; penetration occurs only once in the trajectory, which is explained by the preference of this molecule to partition into the aqueous phase. Conversely, the relative density of the small molecules around the center of the lipid bilayer is nearly 0 g cm−3 in the trajectories of electrically charged CP-154526 as well as Ro 41-0960 (charged and neutral), thus indicating that these molecules do not penetrate across the lipid bilayer in the MD trajectories (Fig. 4D,E).
Cell-based efficacy of SERCA2a activators in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells
We determined the effects of these molecules on Ca2+ flux dynamics and beating rate in spontaneously beating human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes using high-resolution optical mapping. We found that the human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes used in this study are ideally suited for studying the pharmacological stimulation of SERCA2a because they express the major components involved in Ca2+ handling, including SERCA2a, the ryanodine receptor (RyR); the voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel, α-1C subunit (Cav1.2); the cardiac Na+–Ca2+ exchanger (NCX1); and phospholamban (PLN) (Fig. 5A). In response to β2‐adrenergic stimulation, these iPSC-derived cardiac cells populate phosphorylated phospholamban, the main regulator of SERCA2a activity in the heart. This pharmacological effect in response to treatment of iPSC-derived cardiac cells with isoproterenol is illustrated in Fig. 5B.
We first determined the effects of CP-154526, CDN1163, and Ro 41-096 at six different concentrations on the rise and decay in cytosolic Ca2+, i.e., the Ca2+ transient amplitude. We compared these effects to those induced by isoproterenol, which has both positive inotropic and chronotropic effects on the cardiomyocyte via adrenergic stimulation.
CP-154526 at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 µM increases the amplitude of the Ca2+ transient similar to that induced by isoproterenol; however, CP-154526 has a significantly lower effect on the Ca2+ transient amplitude at concentrations of 0.1 and 50 µM (Fig. 6A, left panel). We found no significant differences in the Ca2+ transient amplitude between CDN1163 at all six concentrations and isoproterenol (Fig. 6A, middle panel). In contrast, the changes in the Ca2+ transient amplitude induced by Ro 41-0960 are significantly smaller than those produced by isoproterenol (Fig. 6A, right panel).
Next, we measured the changes in Ca2+ transient duration at 50% recovery (CaTD50) to determine whether the SERCA2a activators tested here operate as lusitropic agents that accelerate the Ca2+ transient decay in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. We found that the decrease in the CaTD50 induced by the three compounds at all concentrations is significantly different from that induced by isoproterenol (Fig. 6B). These differences are not surprising because CP-154526, CDN1163, and Ro 41-096 are expected to act primarily upon SERCA2a activation, whereas isoproterenol is a positive inotrope30 that regulates the function of SERCA2a and other cardiac Ca2+ handling proteins (e.g., the Cav1.2 voltage-gated calcium channels31) via adrenergic stimulation. Nevertheless, we found important differences in CaTD50 across all three SERCA2a activators. Specifically, we found that different concentrations of CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960 induce effects on the CaTD50 that are substantially different from those produced by isoproterenol (Fig. 6B). For instance, both CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960 increase the duration of the Ca2+ transient at a compound concentration of 5 µM, whereas a shortening of the Ca2+ transient is produced by high concentrations (> 50 µM) of Ro 41-0960 (Fig. 6B, right panel). Conversely, our optical mapping experiments indicate that CDN1163 shortens the duration of the Ca2+ transient at most of the concentrations tested in this study (0.5–50 µM, Fig. 6B, middle panel).
Lastly, we determined the effects of all compounds on the changes in the beat rate (i.e., chronotropy) of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. In all cases, there are significant differences in the changes in chronotropy induced by the compounds compared to the inotrope isoproterenol. However, we found that the beat rate of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes is unaltered by CDN1163 and Ro 41-0960 (Fig. 6C). Nevertheless, a comparison between CDN1163 or Ro 41-0960 and CP-154526 showed that this compound has a significant effect on chronotropy (p < 0.05), increasing the beat rate of cardiac cells by 16–33% at compound concentrations of 0.1, 5, 10, and 50 µM (Fig. 6C, left panel).
Atomistic simulations and cell-based experiments bridge the gap between potency and efficacy of activators targeting SERCA2a
How do simulations and experiments integrate to bridge the gap between target-based potency and efficacy of bioactive molecules directed at SERCA2a in cardiac cells? To answer this question, it is instructive to pick two similar examples: CDN1163 and CP-154526 activate SERCA2a in situ with similar µM potency, yet these molecules produce different effects in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells. More specifically, only CDN1163 activates SERCA2a in the cardiomyocyte, as reflected by the ability of small molecules to increase the Ca2+ transient amplitude and decrease the CaTD50 without significant effects on the chronotropy of the healthy cardiomyocyte13,32. Here, the atomistic simulations provide a mechanistic explanation for these differences: both molecules can penetrate across the membrane (Fig. 2), but CDN1163 predominantly binds to the lipid bilayer while CP-154526 partitions to the aqueous phase of the lipid–water system (Fig. 4). Functional evaluation on human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes complements the MD-based results and provides a mechanistic hypothesis for the differences between the pharmacological effects of the SERCA2a activators studied here. For instance, the increase in the amplitude of the Ca2+ transient, the prolongation of the Ca2+ transient decay, and changes in chronotropy observed in response to CP-154526 might result from several factors, including interactions with soluble proteins involved in Ca2+ dynamics33,34 and uncoupling of the SERCA-mediated ATP hydrolysis from Ca2+ transport.
This complementary approach also explains the effects of Ro 41-0960 on the cardiomyocyte: in a lipid–water environment, this molecule partitions primarily to the lipid bilayer, in agreement with the ability of this protein to bind to the transmembrane domain of SERCA and activate it in an isoform-specific manner16. However, atomistic simulations showing that Ro 41-0960 permeates poorly across the cell membrane, thus translating into poor delivery to the sarcoplasmic reticulum and insufficient SERCA2a-mediated lusitropic effect in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells. In summary, the differences in cell-based efficacy may be attributed to a combination of suboptimal ligand delivery to the lipid bilayer, as detected by our MD simulations, as well as off-target effects, as suggested by our cell-based screening assays. Based on this evidence, we can conclude that among the molecules studied here, only CDN1163 targets and activates SERCA2a in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells.
We note that while these simulations alone cannot provide direct insights into the specific interactions between SERCA2a and its activators, the MD simulation pipeline proposed here is complementary to structure-based studies to streamline the selection of hit candidates targeting membrane domains early in the drug discovery campaigns. It is also important to note that while CP-154526 and Ro 41-0960 do not produce the expected pharmacological effects on human iPSC-derived cardiac cells, the high-throughput screening campaigns that led to the discovery of these molecules are not ‘wrong’16, because these molecules are actual activators of SERCA2a in situ (Table 1). Instead, these molecules can be integrated into future structure–activity campaigns aimed at elucidating transmembrane effector sites that can be targeted for therapeutic modulation, designing new chemical probes with optimal potency, and cell-based efficacy, and dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying small-molecule SERCA activation14. Achieving these goals will ultimately enable advance therapeutic interventions that directly target the molecular basis of the disease in the failing heart35.
Pharmacological activation of SERCA2a does not induce pro-arrhythmogenic events in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells
Finally, we addressed drug-induced cardiac toxicity, an issue of significant concern in drug discovery trials, particularly when a promising new lead has a desired pharmacological effect that occurs at the expense of long-term pro-arrhythmia cardiotoxicity36,37. Hence, an important question we ask here is whether pharmacological activation of SERCA2a may induce Ca2+-dependent changes in excitability that lead to arrhythmogenic currents originating from the overload of SR with Ca2+ in response to sustained stimulation of the pump38. To rule out this effect, we performed drug-induced cardiotoxicity screening using high-resolution optical mapping with a voltage-sensitive dye to test the effects of CDN1163 on conduction velocity (CV, Fig. 7A) and action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) in spontaneously beating human iPSC-derived cardiac cells (Fig. 7B). We found that neither CV nor APD90 was significantly affected by the treatment of cardiomyocytes with the SERCA activator CDN1163. Specifically, we found that the CV was 17.5 ± 5 cm/s for untreated cells compared to 19.3 ± 4 cm/s, 25.6 ± 8 cm/s, and 16 ± 3 cm/s for treatment of cells with 0.5, 5 and 50 μM concentrations of CDN1163, respectively (Fig. 7C). Interestingly, we found that the CV is not compromised in electrically coupled iPSC-CMs monolayer syncytia even at very high concentrations of the compound. Furthermore, the APD90 values were similar in all experimental conditions: 324.2 ± 13 ms for untreated cells; and 326.2 ± 31 ms, 342.9 ± 31 ms, and 344.2 ± 24 ms for monolayer syncytia treated with CDN1163 at concentrations of 0.5, 5, and 50 μM, respectively (Fig. 7D). Altogether, the data give us an idea that the compound CDN1163 is not leading to significant electrical alterations in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. These findings are important because changes in CV and/or APD90 are associated with pro-arrhythmia effects, such as re-entrant excitation or early/delayed after depolarizations37,39,40. Therefore, our data indicate that pharmacological stimulation of SERCA2a activity using a relatively potent activator does not induce pro-arrhythmogenic effects in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells. These findings are complementary to previous studies that have shown that stimulation of SERCA2a activity has anti-arrhythmic properties via negative feedback for the Ca2+ wave generation and propagation41. These studies illustrate the importance of integrating organ-specific safety studies earlier into both physiology studies and drug discovery pipelines aimed at validating the use of membrane proteins as safe therapeutic targets.
Conclusion
In summary, we studied small-molecule activation of SERCA2a in human cardiomyocytes to explain the relationships between target-based potency and cell-based efficacy of bioactive molecules targeting a transmembrane protein domain. This approach, which integrates atomistic simulations and high-resolution experiments using human iPSCs, provides a vivid picture of cellular drug delivery and target engagement of molecules directed at membrane proteins. The significance of this approach is illustrated by its potential to distinguish and explain direct target engagement vs off-target effects early in the drug discovery process, as well as its broad applicability to a variety of organ- and patient-specific human cell lines42,43, to more complex multicomponent lipid bilayer mixtures (i.e., those that closely match the lipid composition of the membrane), and complementary experimental and computational tools44–46. The result is a powerful platform to accelerate the discovery and design of bioactive molecules with well-defined potency and cell permeability that can be applied for the systematic interrogation and pharmacological modulation of membrane protein function. We anticipate that this pipeline is complementary to structure-based studies to streamline the selection of hit candidates targeting membrane domains early in the drug discovery campaigns. The flexibility of this platform to use iPSC allows it to expand into the areas of precision medicine, as it allows the use of patient-derived disease cell lines and their gene-corrected isogenic controls for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy and safety of molecules targeting transmembrane protein domains47.
Materials and methods
Setup of small molecules and prediction of LogP values
The 3-D structures of SERCA2a activators CDN1163 (CID: 16016585), CP-154526 (CID: 5311055), and Ro 41-0960 (CID: 3495594) were retrieved from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)48. Geometry optimization was performed using the MMFF94s force field implemented in the obminimize module of OpenBabel49. We employed the chemicalize tool developed by ChemAxon50,51 to predict the pKa of the three molecules. The passive translocation of each of the compounds across a lipid bilayer of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine at 300 K and pH 7.1 was carried out with the PerMM server52 using “Drag” method to calculate the pathway. We assigned the pKa values and the charge at neutral pH in the PDB header of compounds CP-154526 (pKa = 6.37, basic N atom) and Ro 41-0960 (pKa = 5.54, acidic oxygen atom). From this calculation, we retrieved the permeability coefficient of molecules through the black lipid membrane (logPBLM).
Bilayer-crossing profiles of SERCA2a activators
Umbrella sampling simulations were carried out across a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) membrane for each of the compounds with the AMBER99SB-ILDN force field53 implemented in GROMACS 5.1.454. For this study, we chose POPC as a lipid model because this lipid is predominantly found in the membrane of both the sarcolemma and the SR membrane in muscle cells55,56, and therefore we anticipate that this lipid composition recapitulates both membrane permeability and retention across both the sarcolemma and the SR. Ligand topologies and parameters were generated with the ACPYPE interface57 using AM1-BCC method to compute partial charges. POPC lipid parameters were taken from the Slipids (Stockholm Lipids) force field58. For the system setup, we set the molecules approximately 4.0 nm away from the center of mass of a pre-equilibrated lipid bilayer comprised of 100 POPC molecules. The system was solvated using the TIP3P water model and neutralized with sodium and chloride ions. Energy minimization and equilibration using NVT and NPT ensembles (1 ns e/a) were carried out restraining the initial position of the molecule in the aqueous solution. The equilibrated systems were further used to pull the compound into the center of the POPC lipid bilayer during 500 ps with a pulling rate of 0.01 nm ps−1 and a harmonic force constant of 500 kJ mol−1 nm−2. The pulling simulation was performed at 310 K and 1.0 bar using the Nosé–Hoover thermostat59 and the semi-isotropic Parrinello–Rahman barostat60. Forty-three to forty-six configurations were selected along the z-axis reaction coordinate (ξ) for the umbrella sampling simulations. Each configuration was energy minimized and submitted to a restrained NPT equilibration before 10-ns of NPT production run, applying a harmonic force constant of 1000 kJ mol−1 nm−2 to the compound. The position and force data of all the configurations were evaluated with the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM)61 to generate the potential of mean force (PMF) profile. The snapshot with the lowest energy in the PMF profile of each compound was submitted to 300 ns non-restrained NPT production runs at 310 K and 1.0 bar using the previously described thermostat and barostat algorithms. The density profiles were computed with the density built-in tool of GROMACS 5.1.4, while the center of mass position of the molecule in the z-axis of the membrane was calculated with MDAnalysis python library62.
Ensemble-based MD simulations of unbound molecules in a lipid–water environment
A total of 10 molecules of each compound, to a final concentration of ~ 17 µM, were randomly placed in the water phase of a system containing a POPC lipid bilayer consisting of 250 lipid molecules and about 34,300 water molecules. The system was energy minimized and equilibrated during 1 ns using NVT and NPT ensembles. The equilibrated system was subsequently submitted to 300 ns NPT production run using the previously described parameters. Graphs were made using Gnuplot 5.063; visualization was performed using PyMOL version 1.764.
Obtention of cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum microsomes containing SERCA2a
Pig hearts were obtained post-mortem from a near abattoir and placed in ice-cold 10 mM NaHCO3. Ventricular tissue was isolated, minced, and homogenized with a Waring immersion blender in 5 volumes of 10 mM NaHCO3 at 4 °C. All procedures were done at 4 °C and all the buffers contained protease inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 6500g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through 6 layers of gauze and centrifuged at 14,000g for 30 min. The supernatant was filtered and centrifuged at 47,000g for 60 min. The pellet was resuspended in a buffer containing 0.6 M KCl and 20 mM Tris (pH = 6.8) using a Teflon Potter–Elvehjem homogenizer. The suspension was then centrifuged at 120,000g for 60 min. The pellet obtained was resuspended and homogenized in a solution containing 0.3 M sucrose and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). The protein concentration of the microsomal suspension was determined by using Coomassie Plus assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a Synergy H1 multi-mode plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
Measurement of SERCA2a ATPase activity
Concentration-dependent SERCA2a activation assays of CD1163, CP-154526, and Ro 41-0960 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) were performed using microsome preparations obtained from fresh pig hearts. An enzyme-coupled NADH-linked ATPase assay was used to measure SERCA2a ATPase activity in 96-well microplates. Each well-contained assay mix (50 mM MOPS, pH 7.0), 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM NADH, 1 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 10 IU/mL of pyruvate kinase, 10 IU/mL of lactate dehydrogenase, and 1 µM of the calcium ionophore A23187 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and added CaCl2 to set the free Ca2+ concentration to 10 µM. The Ca2+-dependent concentration–response effects of these molecules have been reported in previous studies16,25. Based on these studies, here we used a Ca2+ concentration of 10 µM because it recapitulates the limiting activity of SERCA2a at high Ca2+. 4 µg/mL of microsomal preparation, CaCl2, compound, and assay mix were incubated for 20 min. We tested activity at 11 different concentrations of the compound in the range of 0.05–50 µM (n = 3 per concentration). The assay was started upon the addition of ATP to a final concentration of 5 mM, and absorbance read at 340 nm in a Synergy H1 multi-mode plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
Culture of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes
We used cryopreserved human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iCell Cardiomyocytes2 FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Madison, WI, USA). The cells were thawed and plated on custom-made 96-well or 6 well plates with inserts of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). PDMS vulcanized silicone transparent sheeting was obtained from SMI (Specialty Manufacturing, Inc, Saginaw, MI, USA) with 40D (D, Durometer or ≈ 1000 kPa) hardness and coverslips were cut out to fit in each well of 96 well or 6 well plates. PDMS coverslips were manually added to each well of 96/6 well plates (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) and each plate was subsequently sterilized. PDMS coverslips were then coated with Matrigel (500 μg/mL; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) before plating human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. 50,000 (96-well format for efficacy screening) or 200,000 cells (6-well format used for drug-induced cardiotoxicity screening) were thawed, plated per well, and allowed to form functional syncytia. Cells were maintained in RPMI (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) media supplemented with B27 + (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Cardiomyocyte functional syncytia were maintained in culture for 7–10 days at 37 °C, in 5% CO2 before the screening assays.
Expression of Ca2+-handling proteins in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes using Western Blotting
Cells from the 96 well plates were collected using 2 × Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA), 30 µL per well, and stored at − 20 °C. Samples were loaded into 4–20% Tris–Glycine polyacrylamide precast gels (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) and electrophoresis was carried out. The SDS-PAGE resolved proteins were transferred to iBlot stacks with regular PVDF membranes using the iBlot 2 Dry Blotting System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS-T (in mmol/L, 3 KH2PO4, 10 Na2HPO4, 150 NaCl, 0.15% Tween 20, pH 7.2–7.4) for 30 min at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated with specific primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T overnight at 4 °C. After washing 3 times for 10 min, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T. After washing 3 times for 10 min, protein-antibody reactions were detected using Pierce SuperSignal Chemiluminescent Substrates (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Detection and quantification of protein bands were performed with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc system and Image Lab software 5 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA).
High-resolution optical mapping experiments in human iPSC-derived cardiac cells
We evaluated the effects of SERCA2a activators CDN1163, CP-154526, and Ro 41-0960 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) using cryopreserved human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iCell2 cardiomyocytes, FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Madison, WI, USA). Cardiomyocyte functional syncytia were loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Rhod-2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) to quantify compound effects on intracellular calcium flux, or with the voltage-sensitive dye FluVolt (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) to quantify changes in the membrane potential of iPSC-derived cardiac cells65. Small molecules were solubilized in DMSO at a stock concentration of 10 mM. The stock concentrations of the molecules were diluted in medium to 10× the final concentration for the assay. Baseline optical mapping data was collected before drug treatment. Following, 96-well drug delivery plates were treated with the compounds diluted in Hank’s balanced salt solution (SAFC Biosciences, Lenexa, KS, USA) for 30 min before data acquisition. The plate was then positioned below a high-speed CCD camera (200 fps, 80 × 80 pixels) on a heating block to enable recording at physiological temperature (37 °C). Each 96-well plate was imaged using a validated LED illumination system that enables rapid acquisition of concentration–response data in a high-throughput fashion37. Based on the available in situ EC50 data acquired in this study, we tested CDN1163 and CP-154526 for stimulation of intracellular Ca2+ dynamics on a 96-format well at compound concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 50 µM (n = 6 per concentration), and Ro 41-0960 at compound concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM (n = 6 per concentration). Additionally, isoproterenol at a concentration of 1 µM was used as a positive control. We also evaluated the effects of CDN1163 on conduction velocity and APD90 on a 6-well plate format at compound concentrations of 0.5, 5, and 50 µM (n = 6 per concentration) to screen for potential cardiac toxicity effects induced by this molecule37,66. In all cases, data acquisition occurred before (baseline) and after treatment of cells with the compounds. Post-acquisition data analysis of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte screening assays was done using custom software67,68.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R01HL148068 (to L.M.E.-F. and T.J.H), R01GM120142 (to L.M.E.-F.) and R44ES027703 (to T.J.H), by a Michigan Drug Discovery Grant MDD2019202 (to L.M.E.F.), and by an American Heart Association Grant 19POST34380706 (to E.N.J.-V.). R. A.-O. thanks DGTIC-UNAM for the supercomputing resources and technical support (LANCAD-UNAM-DGTIC-398). This research was supported in part through computational resources and services provided by Advanced Research Computing at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Author contributions
L.M.E.-F. and T.J.H. designed research; R.A.-O., J.C., E.N.J.-V., G.G.-S., N.W., and A.M. da R. performed research; R.A.-O., E.N.J.-V., G.G.-S., A.M. da R., T.J.H., and L.M.E.-F. analyzed data and interpreted results; L.M.E.-F. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
L.M.E.-F. is an editorial board member for Scientific Reports. T.J.H is co-founder of Cartox, Inc., and consultant to StemBioSys, Inc.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Rodrigo Aguayo-Ortiz and Jeffery Creech.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-96217-7.
References
- 1.Cournia Z, et al. Membrane protein structure, function, and dynamics: A perspective from experiments and theory. J. Membr. Biol. 2015;248:611–640. doi: 10.1007/s00232-015-9802-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Muller DJ, Wu N, Palczewski K. Vertebrate membrane proteins: Structure, function, and insights from biophysical approaches. Pharmacol. Rev. 2008;60:43–78. doi: 10.1124/pr.107.07111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Almen MS, Nordstrom KJ, Fredriksson R, Schioth HB. Mapping the human membrane proteome: A majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin. BMC Biol. 2009;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Overington JP, Al-Lazikani B, Hopkins AL. Opinion—How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006;5:993–996. doi: 10.1038/nrd2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng AC, et al. Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:71–75. doi: 10.1038/nbt1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yin H, Flynn AD. Drugging membrane protein interactions. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2016;18:51–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-092115-025322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sudhahar CG, Haney RM, Xue Y, Stahelin RV. Cellular membranes and lipid-binding domains as attractive targets for drug development. Curr. Drug Targets. 2008;9:603–613. doi: 10.2174/138945008785132420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yin H. Exogenous agents that target transmembrane domains of proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2008;47:2744–2752. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Periasamy M, Huke S. SERCA pump level is a critical determinant of Ca(2+)homeostasis and cardiac contractility. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2001;33:1053–1063. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Minamisawa S, et al. Chronic phospholamban-sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase interaction is the critical calcium cycling defect in dilated cardiomyopathy. Cell. 1999;99:313–322. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81662-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Meyer M, et al. A recombinant antibody increases cardiac contractility by mimicking phospholamban phosphorylation. FASEB J. 2004;18:1312–1314. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-1231fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoshijima M, et al. Chronic suppression of heart-failure progression by a pseudophosphorylated mutant of phospholamban via in vivo cardiac rAAV gene delivery. Nat. Med. 2002;8:864–871. doi: 10.1038/nm739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Makarewich CA, et al. The DWORF micropeptide enhances contractility and prevents heart failure in a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Elife. 2018 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aguayo-Ortiz R, Espinoza-Fonseca LM. Linking biochemical and structural states of SERCA: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.3390/ijms21114146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fisher ME, et al. Dwarf open reading frame (DWORF) is a direct activator of the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump SERCA. Elife. 2021 doi: 10.7554/eLife.65545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stroik DR, et al. Targeting protein-protein interactions for therapeutic discovery via FRET-based high-throughput screening in living cells. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:12560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29685-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kaye DM, Hoshijima M, Chien KR. Reversing advanced heart failure by targeting Ca2+ cycling. Annu. Rev. Med. 2008;59:13–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.052407.103237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hajjar RJ, et al. Design of a phase 1/2 trial of intracoronary administration of AAV1/SERCA2a in patients with heart failure. J. Card. Fail. 2008;14:355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yatime L, et al. P-type ATPases as drug targets: Tools for medicine and science. BBA Bioenerg. 2009;1787:207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tadini-Buoninsegni F, Smeazzetto S, Gualdani R, Moncelli MR. Drug interactions with the Ca2+-ATPase from Sarco(Endo)Plasmic Reticulum (SERCA) Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peetla C, Stine A, Labhasetwar V. Biophysical interactions with model lipid membranes: Applications in drug discovery and drug delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2009;6:1264–1276. doi: 10.1021/mp9000662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seddon AM, et al. Drug interactions with lipid membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:2509–2519. doi: 10.1039/b813853m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu HB, Li M, Wang WP, Wang XL. High throughput screening technologies for ion channels. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2016;37:34–43. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lundstrom K. Structural genomics and drug discovery. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2007;11:224–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00028.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kang S, et al. Small molecular allosteric activator of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) attenuates diabetes and metabolic disorders. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:5185–5198. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.705012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baker JE, LaConte LE, Thomas DD, Brust-Mascher I. Muscle chemistry and force. Biophys. J. 2000;79:1687–1688. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76419-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Steenbergen C, Deleeuw G, Rich T, Williamson JR. Effects of acidosis and ischemia on contractility and intracellular pH of rat heart. Circ. Res. 1977;41:849–858. doi: 10.1161/01.res.41.6.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.https://disco.chemaxon.com/calculators/reports/CHEMBL26-AZ_bpka_Eq_T_Report.html. Accessed 02 Aug 2021.
- 29.Postila PA, Vattulainen I, Rog T. Selective effect of cell membrane on synaptic neurotransmission. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:19345. doi: 10.1038/srep19345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lyon AR, et al. SERCA2a gene transfer decreases sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium leak and reduces ventricular arrhythmias in a model of chronic heart failure. Circ. Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:362–372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.961615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu G, et al. Mechanism of adrenergic CaV1.2 stimulation revealed by proximity proteomics. Nature. 2020;577:695–700. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1947-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.del Monte F, et al. Restoration of contractile function in isolated cardiomyocytes from failing human hearts by gene transfer of SERCA2a. Circulation. 1999;100:2308–2311. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.23.2308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seymour PA, Schmidt AW, Schulz DW. The pharmacology of CP-154,526, a non-peptide antagonist of the CRH1 receptor: A review. CNS Drug Rev. 2003;9:57–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2003.tb00244.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hohendanner F, McCulloch AD, Blatter LA, Michailova AP. Calcium and IP3 dynamics in cardiac myocytes: Experimental and computational perspectives and approaches. Front. Pharmacol. 2014;5:35. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lipskaia L, Chemaly ER, Hadri L, Lompre AM, Hajjar RJ. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase as a therapeutic target for heart failure. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2010;10:29–41. doi: 10.1517/14712590903321462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Teneggi V, Sivakumar N, Chen D, Matter A. Drugs' development in acute heart failure: What went wrong? Heart Fail. Rev. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9707-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.da Rocha AM, Creech J, Thonn E, Mironov S, Herron TJ. Detection of drug-induced torsades de pointes arrhythmia mechanisms using hiPSC-CM syncytial monolayers in a high-throughput screening voltage sensitive dye assay. Toxicol. Sci. 2020;173:402–415. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Johnson DM, Antoons G. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in heart failure: Linking beta-adrenergic stimulation, stretch, and calcium. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:1453. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.King JH, Huang CL, Fraser JA. Determinants of myocardial conduction velocity: Implications for arrhythmogenesis. Front. Physiol. 2013;4:154. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Qu Y, et al. Action potential recording and pro-arrhythmia risk analysis in human ventricular trabeculae. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:1109. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fernandez-Tenorio M, Niggli E. Stabilization of Ca(2+) signaling in cardiac muscle by stimulation of SERCA. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2018;119:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Corbett JL, Duncan SA. iPSC-derived hepatocytes as a platform for disease modeling and drug discovery. Front. Med. Lausanne. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Farkhondeh A, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells for neural drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today. 2019;24:992–999. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yue Z, Li C, Voth GA, Swanson JMJ. Dynamic protonation dramatically affects the membrane permeability of drug-like molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:13421–13433. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Berben P, et al. Drug permeability profiling using cell-free permeation tools: Overview and applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018;119:219–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mateus A, et al. Intracellular drug bioavailability: A new predictor of system dependent drug disposition. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:43047. doi: 10.1038/srep43047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paik DT, Chandy M, Wu JC. Patient and disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells for discovery of personalized cardiovascular drugs and therapeutics. Pharmacol. Rev. 2020;72:320–342. doi: 10.1124/pr.116.013003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim S, et al. PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1202–1213. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.O'Boyle NM, et al. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 2011;3:33. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Swain M. chemicalize.org. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012;52:613–615. doi: 10.1021/ci300046g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pence HE, Williams A. Chemspider: An online chemical information resource. J. Chem. Educ. 2010;87:1123–1124. doi: 10.1021/ed100697w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lomize AL, et al. PerMM: A web tool and database for analysis of passive membrane permeability and translocation pathways of bioactive molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019;59:3094–3099. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins. 2010;78:1950–1958. doi: 10.1002/prot.22711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Abraham MJ, et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX. 2015;1–2:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fiehn W, Peter JB, Mead JF, Gan-Elepano M. Lipids and fatty acids of sarcolemma, sarcoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria from rat skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 1971;246:5617–5620. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)61852-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bick RJ, Buja LM, Van Winkle WB, Taffet GE. Membrane asymmetry in isolated canine cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum: Comparison with skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J. Membr. Biol. 1998;164:169–175. doi: 10.1007/s002329900402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sousa da Silva AW, Vranken WF. ACPYPE—AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res. Notes. 2012;5:367. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jambeck JP, Lyubartsev AP. An extension and further validation of an all-atomistic force field for biological membranes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:2938–2948. doi: 10.1021/ct300342n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Braga C, Travis KP. A configurational temperature Nose-Hoover thermostat. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;123:134101. doi: 10.1063/1.2013227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Parrinello M, Rahman A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 1981;52:7182–7190. doi: 10.1063/1.328693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA. The weighted histogram analysis method for fre-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The Method. J. Comput. Chem. 1992;13:1011–1021. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540130812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gowers, R. et al. MD analysis: A Python package for the rapid analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. In Proceedings of the 15th Python in Science Conference, 98–105. 10.25080/majora-629e541a-00e (2016).
- 63.Gnuplot 5.0: An interactive plotting program (2017).
- 64.The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System v. 1.7 (2010).
- 65.Lee P, et al. Simultaneous voltage and calcium mapping of genetically purified human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocyte monolayers. Circ. Res. 2012;110:1556–1563. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.262535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gintant G, et al. Repolarization studies using human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Validation studies and best practice recommendations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020;117:104756. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Campbell K, et al. Spatial gradients in action potential duration created by regional magnetofection of hERG are a substrate for wavebreak and turbulent propagation in cardiomyocyte monolayers. J. Physiol. 2012;590:6363–6379. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.238758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.da Rocha AM, et al. hiPSC-CM monolayer maturation state determines drug responsiveness in high throughput pro-arrhythmia screen. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:13834. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13590-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.