Anticancer bispecific antibody R&D advances: a study focusing on research trend worldwide and in China

Abstract

Background

The bispecific antibody (bsAbs) research around the world has undergone great changes. We analyzed the global trend of bsAbs research and compared the differences in clinical research of bsAbs between China and worldwide.

Methods

BsAbs research clinical trials information was retrieved through the online open-resource clinical trial registration platform. Research information including organizations, identity numbers, locations, phases, participating centers, conditions, status, enrollment, targets, spectrums of mechanism of action (MOA), and start date was collected. Clinical trials were divided into two categories based on the attributes of pharmaceutical companies (international or China-initiated or involved).

Results

From 1997 to 2020, 272 clinical trials regarding bsAbs research were retrieved. Twenty-nine percent of the studies were contributed by companies from Chinese institutions, which followed the USA and ranked second. The clinical trials of bsAbs are mainly concentrated on phase I (n = 161), phase I/II (n = 54), and phase II (n = 51), and the number of phase III trials is still rare (n = 4). Tumor species distribution analysis shows that there are significantly higher focuses on gastric cancer (n = 18), esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer (n = 16), bladder cancer (n = 10), biliary malignant tumor (n = 8), nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 6), and thymic cancer (n = 2) in China. BsAbs target and spectrums of MOA analysis showed that international companies mainly focus on bsAbs with CD3-based (n = 63) target with MOA of T-cell redirection, while researches in China pay more attention to PD-1 (n = 9)/PD-L1 (n = 7) axises with MOA of double immune checkpoint blocking.

Conclusion

Global bsAbs research increased rapidly during the 1997 to 2020 period. The developed countries in America and Europe are leading the trend of bsAbs research. Anticancer bsAbs clinical research in China is booming and chasing after the world trend.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-021-01126-x.

To The Editor

BsAb anti-tumor clinical researches have continued to grow rapidly worldwide and in China [1–4], whereas scientific research and development are still unbalanced [5–7]. This study helps to comprehensively understand the global development of bsAbs and the trend of technological innovation development in China with this aspect.

Booming development in anticancer bispecific antibodies investigation

International R&D pharmaceutical enterprises have conducted 193 bsAbs clinical trials (Additional file 1: Table S1), and China-initiated or involved R&D pharmaceutical enterprises have conducted 79 clinical trials (Additional file 1: Table S2). The characteristics of bsAbs research at domestic and international pharmaceutical companies are different in many aspects (Additional file 1: Table S3). Overall distribution of bsAbs clinical research is illustrated in a topographic map (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). A total of 98 locations in China participate in anticancer bsAbs research, making it the second highest country to USA (Fig. 1a; Additional file 1: Table S4). Beijing, Guangdong, Henan, Taiwan, Shandong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai are the main research areas of bsAbs clinical research in China (Additional file 2: Fig. S1B and Additional file 1: Table S5).

Fig. 1.

The trend of anticancer bsAbs clinical trials with different clinical stages and status (up to December 2020). a Clinical stages of overall clinical trials. b Clinical stages of international companies. c Clinical stages of China-initiated or involved companies. d Research status and enrollment of overall clinical trials. e Research status and enrollment of international companies. f Research status and enrollment of China-initiated or involved companies. The MOA of bsAbs clinical trials. g MOA of overall clinical trials. h MOA of international companies. i MOA of China-initiated or involved companies. Network graph characterizing the target pairs of bispecific antibodies. Each dot in the figure is a target, and each line connecting two circular nodes represents a bsAbs. The size of the dot is proportional to the number of pairs of the target with other different targets, and the width of the line is proportional to the number of clinical trials of the target. j Target pairs of overall clinical trials. k Target pairs of international companies. l Target pairs of China-initiated or involved companies

More expansion of early phase studies and study scale

Global bsAbs clinical trials are mainly concentrated on phase I (n = 161), phase I/II, and phase II, and phase III trials are still rare (Fig. 1a). International pharmaceutical companies’ anti-tumor bsAbs research has entered a stage of rapid development after 2014 (Fig. 1b), while China outbroke since 2017 (Fig. 1c). The number of phase I/II and II/III research designs has gradually increased, and new bsAbs research designs have emerged. Most of the clinical studies are under recruitment, and a few clinical studies have been suspended for various reasons (Fig. 1d–f).

The mechanism of action of bispecific antibodies clinical trials

The mechanism of action (MOA) of bsAbs included six categories (Additional file 1: Table S6). The global and international companies MOA is mainly based on T-cell recruitment (Fig. 1g, h, Additional file 3: Fig. S2A–B), and China-initiated or involved is concentrated on double immune checkpoint blocking (Fig. 1i, Additional file 3: Fig. S2A–B). Globally, the focus of MOA lies in T-cell recruitment and double immune checkpoint blocking, while investigations into tumor-targeted immunomodulators are rare (Additional file 3: Fig. S2C). In contrast to the focus on T-cell redirection by international pharmaceutical companies (Additional file 3: Fig. S2C), the research trend on the mechanism of double immune checkpoint blocking action has gradually increased in China (Additional file 3: Fig. S2D).

Diverse targets of bispecific antibodies clinical research

The targets of bsAbs research are drawn into network diagrams (Fig. 1j–l). Obviously, international researches and those in China focus on different targets. International R&D companies mainly focus on CD3-based (n = 63) bsAbs (Fig. 1k), while Chinese R&D enterprises pay more attention to PD-1 (n = 9)/PD-L1 (n = 7) axises compounds (Fig. 1l).

Diverse cancer types studied in anticancer bispecific antibodies

The investigated tumor-type distribution of bsAbs studies is significantly different between China and other countries (Fig. 2). For international bsAbs clinical studies, solid tumors (58%) and hematological tumors (42%) account for nearly half of each, and subtypes of hematological tumors included lymphoma and leukemia (Fig. 2a). Nearly 91% of Chinese bsAbs clinical studies located at solid tumors, and the research on hematological tumors is obviously underappreciated (only 9% with all subtypes turns lymphomas) (Fig. 2b). For participating centers, international bsAbs clinical studies are dominated by multiple-center design (85%), while single-center design (54%) and multiple-center design (46%) are basically the same in China (Fig. 1d, e). For solid tumors distribution, breast cancer (n = 40), lung cancer (n = 36), and gastric cancer (n = 31) are the top three research tumor types (Fig. 2c). Higher focuses on gastric cancer (n = 18), esophageal/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer (n = 16), bladder cancer (n = 10), biliary malignant tumor (n = 8), nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 6), and thymic cancer (n = 2) were observed in China (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2.

Distribution of studied tumor types. a Tumor types of international companies. b Tumor types of China-initiated or involved companies. c Solid tumor types of overall clinical trials. d Solid tumor types of international companies and China-initiated or involved companies, respectively

The trend of the anticancer bsAbs investigation differed from the international and the domestic in many aspects with respect to the study time span, quantity, scale, tumor species diversity target coverage, and MOA of bsAbs. To narrow the gap with other countries, China has made great efforts for constructing the evolution of the pharmaceutical ecosystem and innovative drug R&D. By combining academia and industry, more advanced scientific discoveries and technological revolution in China are transforming into anti-tumor drugs innovation. Besides, since 2017 the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China has implemented a series of regulatory reforms to support an environment that encourages novel drugs innovation [8–12], which optimized the drug approval management process and speeded up the approval of imported drugs in China. Under the guidance of national policies, increasing domestic pharmaceutical companies have shifted from focusing on generic drugs to "first-in-class" new anti-tumor candidates’ investigations (including the bsAbs). In spite of the above efforts and achievements, China still has a long way to go in terms of novel drug R&D and the anti-tumor bsAbs investigations. China is supposed to reexamine the current distribution of bsAbs targets, to explore more abundant tumor types, and be open-minded and introduced more novel technologies and products. In that way, more promising anticancer bsAbs will come out and more therapeutic strategies will be investigated to eventually bring new hope to cancer patients.

Abbreviations

R&D

Research and Development

BsAb

Bispecific antibody

FDA

The US Food and Drug Administration

CNS

Nervous system tumors

GEJ

Gastroesophageal junction

BMT

Biliary malignant tumor

BpAb

Biparatopic antibody

CTLA-4

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4

HER2

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

LAG-3

Lymphocyte activation gene-3

MOA

Mechanism of action

PD-1

Programmed cell death protein 1

PD-L1

Programmed death ligand 1

TAA

Tumor-associated antigen

TCR

T-cell receptor

TGF-β

Transforming growth factor β

Authors' contributions

Zhonghan Zhang, Hongyun Zhao, and Li Zhang were involved in conception and design; Zhonghan Zhang, Jiaxin Cao, and Fan Luo were involved in literature retrieval; Feiteng Lu, Jiaxin Cao, Kangmei Zeng, Yang Zhang, and Yuxiang Ma were involved in data extraction and quality assessment; Zhonghan Zhang and Fan Luo were involved in statistical guidance; Zhonghan Zhang, Jiaxin Cao, and Feiteng Lu were involved in data analysis and interpretation; Zhonghan Zhang, Jiaxin Cao, Fan Luo, Feiteng Lu, Kangmei Zeng, Yang Zhang, Yuxiang Ma, Hongyun Zhao, and Li Zhang wrote the manuscript; All authors were involved in primary revision before submitting and final approval of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, and Cancer Immunotherapy Research Foundation of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO)-Junshi.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions, were involved at all stages of manuscript development, and have approved the final version.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.