Abstract
The selection of carbohydrates or fat to generate intracellular energy is thought to be crucial for long-term metabolic health. While most studies assess fuel selection after a metabolic challenge, the determinants of substrate oxidation in the fasted state remain largely unexplored. We therefore assessed the respiratory quotient by indirect calorimetry as a read-out for substrate oxidation following an overnight fast. This cross-sectional analysis consisted of 192 (92 women, 100 men) either lean or obese participants. Following an overnight fast, the respiratory quotient (RQ) was assessed, after which a 5-point 75-g oral glucose tolerance test was performed. Unlike glucose and insulin, fasting free fatty acids (FFA) correlated negatively with fasting RQ (p < 0.0001). Participants with high levels of the ketone body β-hydroxybutyric acid had significantly lower RQ values. Fasting levels of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glicentin were positively associated with fasting RQ (all p ≤ 0.03), whereas GLP-1 showed no significant association. Neither BMI, nor total body fat, nor body fat distribution correlated with fasting RQ. No relationship between the RQ and diabetes or the metabolic syndrome could be observed. In the fasting state, FFA concentrations were strongly linked to the preferentially oxidized substrate. Our data did not indicate any relationship between fasting substrate oxidation and metabolic diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. Since glicentin and GIP are linked to fuel selection in the fasting state, novel therapeutic approaches that target these hormones may have the potential to modulate substrate oxidation.
Subject terms: Endocrinology, Medical research
Introduction
The selection of the predominant fuel source for intracellular energy generation is crucial for long-term health. Alterations are linked to a number of diseases, including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases1–3. The two major cellular energy substrates glucose and free fatty acids (FFA) are metabolized via glycolysis and beta oxidation, respectively, to generate acetyl-CoA. Acetyl-CoA is further metabolized and biochemical energy is generated in the mitochondria by a process known as oxidative phosphorylation4.
The relative amount of substrate that is oxidized over a certain period of time can be assessed non-invasively by indirect calorimetry. The respiratory quotient (RQ)—as a ratio of exhaled carbon dioxide to consumed oxygen—indicates the preferentially oxidized substrate5.
Several studies report that both fasting and 24-h-RQ are predictors for long-term weight gain. High fasting as well as average 24-h-RQ, which are indicative of predominant glucose oxidation relative to fatty acids, is linked to subsequent body fat accumulation6–9. The importance of altered substrate oxidation is further emphasized by the association shown between higher RQ and insulin resistance10, hepatic steatosis11, hypertension12 and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis13 in individuals with overweight/obesity.
Metabolic flexibility describes the ability to adapt substrate oxidation to substrate availability14. This was initially reported for the transition from the fasting to the fed state. Only later was the crucial switch of fuel oxidation in response to overnight fasting brought into focus15. To date, several clinical conditions with impaired metabolic flexibility have been identified. In patients with insulin-resistance, obesity and diabetes, diminished fat oxidation during nocturnal fasting and diminished postprandial upregulation of carbohydrate oxidation have been reported1,16. Despite the fact that key determinants of postprandial regulation have been addressed in a number of studies, the regulation of fasting substrate oxidation remains largely elusive. Since most individuals spend a substantial time of their day in a fasted state, the oxidized substrates following overnight fasting are probably crucial to maintain long-term health. Glucose concentrations decrease during fasting while FFA increases. We therefore hypothesize that the predominant cellular energy source after overnight fast are lipids. To test this hypothesis, and to detect disease-related alterations, we analyzed early morning fasting RQ and its´ relation to glucose and FFA in a cohort of humans, ranging from lean and healthy to obese patients with diabetes.
Results
In our participants, the median RQ was 0.85 (IQR: 0.79–0.9). No significant difference was found in RQ between men and women (p = 0.06, padj, age = 0.2). RQ was correlated to age, with lower values in older subjects (p = 0.03, padj, sex, BMI = 0.02; Fig. 1A). Neither BMI nor the total amount of adipose tissue was correlated to RQ (all p ≥ 0.06; Figs. 1B and 2A, respectively). RQ was not correlated with any of the analyzed body fat compartments (p ≥ 0.1; Fig. 2C,D, respectively) or with the amount of intrahepatic lipid accumulation (p = 0.6, padj, sex, age = 0.3; Fig. 2B).
We first tested whether substrate oxidation is linked to fasting substrate availability. Fasting glucose was not associated with RQ (p = 0.2, padj, sex, age = 0.7; Fig. 1C). By contrast, a significant negative correlation was found between FFA and RQ (p < 0.0001; Fig. 1D). This correlation remained significant after adjustment for sex and age (p < 0.0001). We also detected a significant negative association between ß-hydroxybutyric acid and RQ (p = 0.02, padj, sex, age = 0.02; Fig. 1E).
Since the impact of insulin is crucial for substrate availability, we further analyzed the relationship between insulin and substrate oxidation. Neither circulating insulin, nor whole-body insulin sensitivity, nor adipose tissue insulin sensitivity were related to RQ (all p ≥ 0.07; Table 1).
Table 1.
N = 192 | Median (IQR)/n | p value (unadj./adj.*) | Stand. β (standard error) |
---|---|---|---|
Sex | 0.06/0.2# | − 0.092 (0.0069) | |
Male | 100 | ||
Female | 92 | ||
Age (years) | 51 (27–62) | 0.03/0.02## | − 0.188 (0.017) |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 30.1 (24.7–33.7) | 0.9/0.06 | 0.162 (0.036) |
Blood pressurea | |||
Systolic (mmHg) | 137 (127–145) | 0.6/0.97 | − 0.003 (0.065) |
Diastolic (mmHg) | 89 (80–96) | 0.7/0.6 | 0.044 (0.001) |
Heart rate (bpm)a | 69 (63–78) | 0.6/0.7 | − 0.029 (0.041) |
Metabolic syndromeb | 0.8/0.4 | − 0.071 (0.007) | |
Yes | 87 | ||
No | 100 | ||
Glycemic category | 0.6/0.8 | ||
Normal glucose tolerance | 107 | ||
Prediabetes | 75 | ||
Diabetes mellitus (newly diagnosed, treatment naïve) | 10 | ||
Indirect calorimetry | |||
Fasting respiratory quotient | 0.85 (0.79–0.90) | ||
Resting energy expenditure (kcal) | 2008 (1746–2275) | 0.3/0.9 | 0.009 (0.000) |
Body composition | |||
Total adipose tissue, MR-derived (l)c | 37.9 (26.5–47.3) | 0.7/0.1 | 0.184 (0.022) |
Subcutaneous adipose tissue lower extremity, MR-derived (l)c | 13.7 (9.7–17.6) | 0.7/0.1 | 0.161 (0.025) |
Visceral adipose tissue, MR-derived (l)d | 4.2 (2.3–6.0) | 0.5/0.1 | 0.180 (0.017) |
Intrahepatic fat, MRS-derived (%)e | 4.1 (1.4–9.7) | 0.6/0.3 | 0.110 (0.008) |
Glycemia | |||
HbA1c (mmol/mol)f/HbA1c (%)f | 37 (34–40)/5.5 (5.3–5.8) | 0.9/0.3 | 0.090 (0.064) |
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)g | 5.3 (4.9–5.8) | 0.2/0.7 | − 0.033 (0.056) |
Fasting insulin (pmol/l)g | 70 (45–109) | 0.5/0.1 | 0.122 (0.011) |
Fasting C-peptide (pmol/l)h | 516 (363–711) | 0.9/0.2 | 0.115 (0.016) |
Disposition indexi | 1243 (684–2061) | 0.1/0.6 | 0.040 (0.009) |
Insulin sensitvity index (OGTT-derived)j | 9.6 (5.6–15.2) | 0.8/0.1 | − 0.119 (0.011) |
Adipo-IR (mmol/l * pmol/l)h | 36.0 (19.2–57.4) | 0.07/0.3 | − 0.082 (0.009) |
Plasma lipids | |||
Free fatty acids (µmol/l)h | 498 (375–633) | < 0.0001/< 0.0001 | − 0.305 (0.016) |
Triglycerides (mg/dl)i | 97 (74–137) | 0.8/0.4 | 0.073 (0.015) |
Cholesterol (mg/dl)i | 190 (158–227) | 0.6/0.4 | 0.081 (0.000) |
LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dl)i | 121 (95–150) | 0.4/0.7 | 0.032 (0.025) |
HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dl)i | 52 (43–62) | 0.9/0.4 | 0.069 (0.029) |
Lipoprotein (a) (mg/dl)i | 12 (7–39) | 0.3/0.3 | − 0.082 (0.006) |
Proglucagon cleavage productsk | |||
Insulin/Glucagon ratio | 15.5 (12.7–20.4) | 0.9/0.97 | 0.008 (0.030) |
Glucagon (pmol/l) | 5.67 (4.27–8.91) | 0.03/0.03 | 0.421 (0.032) |
Glicentin (pmol/l) | 17.28 (11.11–26.90) | 0.02/0.03 | 0.365 (0.031) |
Glucagon-like peptide 1 (pmol/l) | 3.39 (2.22–4.25) | 0.08/0.1 | 0.284 (0.021) |
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (pmol/l) | 3.82 (2.52–6.64) | 0.008/0.01 | 0.474 (0.028) |
Others | |||
ß-Hydroxybutyric acid (µM/l)k | 47.2 (30.2–85.4) | 0.02/0.02 | − 0.382 (0.015) |
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (mU/l)i | 1.82 (1.19–2.75) | 0.3/0.7 | 0.026 (0.009) |
C-reactive protein (mg/dl)i | 0.12 (0.03–0.35) | 0.7/0.1 | 0.121 (0.005) |
Morning cortisol, serum (nmol/l)i | 387 (297–508) | 0.5/0.2 | − 0.104 (0.019) |
MR magnetic resonance, MRS magnetic resonance spectroscopy, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, Adipo-IR adipose tissue insulin resistance index, LDL-Cholesterol low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
*Adjusted for sex and age; # adjusted for age; ## adjusted for sex and BMI. Standardized ß are from multivariate linear regression models. a: n = 190; b: n = 187; c: n = 137; d: n = 139; e: n = 140; f: n = 178; g: n = 191; h: n = 181; i: n = 179; j: n = 184; k: n = 38. p < 0.05 are printed in bold.
We next analyzed the relationship of proglucagon cleavage products and GIP to RQ. Albeit there was no link for GLP-1 (p = 0.08, padj, sex, age = 0.1; Table 1), glucagon (p = 0.03; Fig. 1F), glicentin (p = 0.02; Fig. 1H) and GIP (p = 0.008; Fig. 1G) were positively associated with RQ. These associations remained significant after adjustment for sex and age (p ≤ 0.03). Following adjustment for FFA, glucagon was no longer associated with RQ (padj, sex, age, FFA = 0.09), whereas the association of RQ and GIP as well as with glicentin remained significant (p ≤ 0.04). Moreover, adjustment for fasting glucose did not alter the association of glucagon with RQ.
Neither thyroid-stimulating hormone nor serum cortisol was correlated to RQ (all p ≥ 0.2; Table 1).
We further addressed the relationship between metabolic disorders and fasting substrate oxidation. RQ was comparable between participants with normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes or newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes (p = 0.6, padj, sex, age = 0.8; Table 1). It was also comparable between participants with and without the metabolic syndrome (p = 0.8, padj, sex, age = 0.4; Table 1).
We next tested for potential interactions between weight groups (normal weight/overweight vs obese) and anthropometric/clinical parameters on RQ. These analyses revealed no statistically significant interactions for glucose and FFA, indicating that their relation to RQ is comparable between the two weight groups (Suppl. Table 1). Similar interaction analyses with glycemic categories and presence/absence of the metabolic syndrome also revealed no interactions between glucose or FFA on RQ (interaction with glycemic categories: p(interaction glycemic cat × glucose) = 0.2 and p(interaction glycemic cat × FFA) = 0.8; interaction with metabolic syndrome: p(interaction met syndrome × glucose) = 0.5 and p(interaction met syndrome × FFA) = 0.1).
No association was found between systolic or diastolic blood pressure and RQ (all p ≥ 0.6). Since 53 of the 192 participants received antihypertensive medication, we repeated the analysis after excluding the former. Thereafter, blood pressure still did not correlate with RQ (all p ≥ 0.4). However, the correlation between FFA and RQ remained significant (p = 0.003, padj, sex, age = 0.005).
We next analyzed resting energy expenditure. There was a negative correlation of age with resting energy expenditure (Suppl. Fig. 1A). Higher BMI was associated with higher resting energy expenditure (Suppl. Fig. 1B). While resting energy expenditure was positively associated with fasting glucagon (Suppl. Fig. 1F), this significance disappeared after adjustment for sex (p = 0.7).
Discussion
We investigated potential major metabolic determinants of substrate oxidation in the fasting state. An analysis of a wide range of participants, from lean and healthy to obese with diabetes, enabled us to identify FFA as a potential major determinant of substrate oxidation. Furthermore, glicentin, GIP and ketone bodies were additional independent determinants. By contrast, glycemia was not related to nutrient utilization. Surprisingly, no link could be established between the preferred oxidized substrate and metabolic diseases, including obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.
In contrast to our hypothesis, the predominant cellular energy source before breakfast in the morning was not solely FFA, but a mixture of substrates with large intra-individual differences (and a RQ range of 0.7–1.1). This tallies well with previous findings in a number of populations17.
Aging has been reported to result in a shift from fat to glucose oxidation in some18,19 but not all previous trials20. Our analysis detected higher rates of fat oxidation in older persons. Age-related insulin resistance has been proposed to be one contributing factor21. However, since we did not detect any association between insulin sensitivity and RQ, our results do not support this hypothesis. Since substrate oxidation takes place in the mitochondria, age-related alterations in mitochondrial function22, together with rising FFA concentrations, could govern shifts in substrate oxidation towards lipids during aging. Results on differences in substrate utilization between sexes are inconsistent6,12,18,20,23. We did not detect any significant differences in fasting RQ.
Glucose is a major energy source, and a sufficient supply is ensured even in the fasting state. While more ATP is generated from lipids, cellular energy formation from glucose is more efficient in terms of oxygen consumption24, and some cell types largely depend on glucose. In the muscle, there is a competition between glucose and FFA as the major energy source25. However, there is no link between circulating glucose and substrate utilization. While carbohydrate availability has been proposed as a determinant26, our current results argue against the hypothesis that substrate oxidation is purely the result of substrate availability.
In contrast to glucose, circulating FFA are robustly linked to cellular substrate oxidation, independent of the tested confounders. When abundantly available or experimentally elevated27, FFA tend to be oxidized. This tallies with earlier reports28,29 and is in accordance with Randle’s hypothesis that fatty acids suppress glucose oxidation in skeletal muscle25. Indeed, fatty acid oxidation is directly linked to circulating FFA concentrations30. Of note, the regulation of substrate oxidation by FFA was independent of insulin, insulin-sensitivity and of the amount of lipids stored in adipose tissue. This might be due to direct intracellular regulation, since fatty acids and their metabolic intermediates are not only energy sources but also possess signaling properties31,32.
Unlike prior reports14,29,33, we found no connection between fasting insulin or insulin sensitivity and substrate oxidation. Inclusion of participants with different glycemic categories cannot explain these differences, as glycemic status did not influence our detected relations. Insulin is a potent suppressor of lipolysis and thereby inhibits FFA supply. Concurrently, it stimulates cellular glucose uptake and could thereby promote glucose oxidation. However, these functions occur in the postprandial state, during which insulin concentrations rise rapidly. Theoretically, in the fasting state, insulin should not determine substrate oxidation. This could explain why we did not detect any links to RQ, while other studies which included postprandial periods found such contributions of insulin.
Some organs, including the brain, are unable to utilize fatty acids as their sole energy source. These organs rely on ketone bodies, formed from fatty acids in the liver, as an alternative energy source34. In the current study, we assessed ß-hydroxybutyric acid which is, quantitatively speaking, the major ketone body. The link of ketone bodies with lower RQ is plausible since their formation depends on fatty acid oxidation in the liver. Furthermore, the utilization of ketone bodies also results in a low RQ. Physiologic ketone body production has recently been linked to beneficial effects on heart, brain and muscle35. High spontaneous ketones were even found to be predictive of long-term reduced risk for diabetes36.
Further novel observations are the correlations between substrate oxidation and GIP as well as with glicentin. Upon food intake, the incretins GIP and glicentin are secreted from duodenal cells and subsequently modulate energy metabolism37,38. Their regulation in the fasting state is largely unknown. We observed lower rates of fat oxidation in persons with higher fasting levels of circulating GIP and glicentin. Our data are in line with animal models in which GIP signaling decreased fat oxidation via skeletal muscle and adipose tissue39 and was crucial in cellular lipid handling40. How glicentin contributes to substrate oxidation is still unknown and further experimental studies are required to determine the significance of our findings.
The detected association of glucagon and RQ was presumably mediated by FFA, which is probably due to glucagon’s stimulatory effect on FFA turnover41. We assume that glucagon reduces the availability of FFA since the latter serve as precursors for gluconeogenesis. This could explain the observed increased rates of glucose oxidation in persons with high circulating glucagon levels.
Several trials reported a relationship between fat mass and lipid oxidation33,42,43. As visceral fat associates with insulin resistance and lower fat oxidation44,45, whereby subcutaneous fat is linked to higher fat oxidation46,47, we quantified both. However, fuel selection was associated with neither BMI, nor fat mass, nor body fat distribution. This is in agreement with Ferro et al., who likewise detected no link between fasting RQ and body fat content12. Our data therefore do not support the hypothesis of reduced lipid oxidation as a cause or consequence of obesity. This “low fat oxidation hypothesis” was discussed in a recent meta-analysis which came to the conclusion that there is no convincing experimental evidence to support this hypothesis17.
While one study reported lower fasting RQ in diabetes10, neither we nor two earlier trials12,20 detected such a difference to persons with normal glucose tolerance. Thus, fasting substrate oxidation does not appear to make any major contribution to body weight, body fat distribution, or metabolic diseases.
Since our current work is a cross-sectional analysis, the data do not permit us to test the prospective value of RQ. Furthermore, some associations might only be present in specific subgroups that were not available in sufficiently large numbers to warrant analysis in our study. The fasting concentrations of some of the analyzed hormones are rather low and their physiological relevance in the fasting state has not been extensively studied so far (e.g. incretins).
Taken together, we detected FFA as a potential major determinant of fasting substrate oxidation and possible contributions of glicentin and GIP as well as of ketone bodies. Since the preferred oxidized substrate was not linked to metabolic diseases, fuel selection in the fasting state probably does not make any major contribution to obesity, diabetes, or the metabolic syndrome. Upcoming pharmacological approaches target GIP signaling48,49. Our results indicate that they have the potential to modulate preferred substrate oxidation.
Materials and methods
Data acquisition was performed at the University Hospital of Tübingen between October 2016 and August 2020, as part of ongoing clinical studies (NCT02991365, NCT03590561, NCT03615209, NCT03227484, NCT03525002, and NCT04052399). The study protocols were approved by the local ethics committee (Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Eberhard Karls University and the University Hospital Tübingen) and all experiments were conducted in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Further, all participants provided informed written consent.
Study design and participants
One hundred and ninety-six participants from six ongoing trials were included in this cross-sectional analysis. We selected all participants, for whom data from indirect calorimetry in the fasting state were available, which was performed at the beginning of each study. Four participants were excluded from data analysis due to implausible indirect calorimetry or laboratory measurements. Participants had a median age of 51 years (IQR: 28–62), the majority were overweight or obese (median (IQR): BMI: 30.1 kg/m2 (25.0–33.6)), and had a median HbA1c of 5.5% (5.3–5.8). 53 participants took antihypertensive medication. Patient characteristics are reported in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2.
A medical history was recorded and a physical examination was performed. Following an overnight fast and an indirect calorimetry, all participants were subjected to a 5-point, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to assess insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion and glycemic categories. Normal glucose tolerance was found in 107 participants, 75 had prediabetes, and in 10 patients, type 2 diabetes was diagnosed by way of this OGTT. None of the participants took any medication interfering with glucose metabolism.
Laboratory measurements and calculations
Venous blood samples were taken before, as well as 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after glucose administration. Serum insulin and C-peptide were determined by an immunoassay on an ADVIA Centaur system (Siemens Healthineers, Eschborn, Germany). Glucose and triglycerides, together with total, HDL, and LDL lipoprotein cholesterol levels were assessed using the ADVIA XPT clinical chemical system (Siemens Healthineers, Eschborn, Germany). Plasma concentrations of total FFA were measured with an enzymatic method (WAKO Chemicals, Neuss, Germany) on the latter instrument. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements were carried out with the Tosoh A1c analyzer HLC-723G8 (Tosoh Bioscience GmbH, Griesheim, Germany).
Whole-body insulin sensitivity was determined using Matsuda Index50. One unusually high value for Matsuda Index (> 5 SD above median) was excluded from data analysis. Insulin resistance of adipose tissue at fasting was estimated by Adipo-IR Index (adipose tissue insulin resistance index)51. Insulin secretion was assessed by Disposition Index52.
Metabolic syndrome was classified in accordance with the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)53, while glucose tolerance was in accordance with the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA)54.
In a subset of 38 participants, fasting glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, and glicentin were measured by commercial immunoassays (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Fasting β-hydroxybutyric acid was measured by an enzymatic 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase-based Ketone Body Assay (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Indirect calorimetry
Indirect calorimetry was performed in the morning after an overnight fast of at least 10 h abstinence from food, nicotine and caffeine.
The exhaled air was analyzed with Vyntus CPX (Carefusion, Hoechberg, Germany). Total average energy expenditure in kilocalories (kcal) was calculated using the modified Weir´s equation55.
During substrate oxidation, oxygen (VO2) is consumed and carbon dioxide (VCO2) is produced. The ratio of VCO2 and VO2 in the exhaled air represents the respiratory quotient. It is dependent on the relative amounts of oxidized substrates and reflects substrate utilization. Physiologically, the RQ ranges between 0.67 and 1.256,57. Under stable protein utilization, an RQ equal to 1 indicates preferential glucose metabolism, while an RQ of 0.7 reflects predominantly lipid oxidation.
Body fat distribution and intrahepatic fat
Quantification of whole-body adipose tissue and intrahepatic fat was performed on the same day prior to indirect calorimetry by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS). A 3T whole-body imager (Magnetom Vida, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), as described previously58, was used. Segmentation of adipose tissue was performed by an automatic procedure based on fuzzy clustering59. Intrahepatic fat was quantified by localized 1H-MRS from the posterior part of segment 7 by applying a single-voxel STEAM technique with a short echo time (TE = 10 ms). Integrals of methylene/methyl resonances (lipids) and water were assessed and intrahepatic fat was determined in percent by calculating the ratio of lipids and water + lipids.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was carried out using JMP 14.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Prior to analysis, skewed variables were log transformed. Correlations were tested by multivariate linear regression analysis with adjustments for sex and age. Data are presented as median with IQR. p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank all volunteers for their participation in these trials. In particular, we thank Karin Waneck, Ines Wagener, Eva-Maria Stehle, Alexandra Eberle, Anja Dessecker, Dorothee Neuscheler, and Alke Guirguis (all University of Tübingen) for their excellent technical assistance.
Author contributions
J.H. researched and analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. L.F., A.V., C.D., K.K., J.M. and R.W. researched data. M.Ho., H.U.H., N.S., A.B., C.W. and A.F. contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results. A.P. supervised the laboratory measurements and interpreted the results. M.He. supervised the project and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the discussion and approved the final manuscript prior to submission.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. We acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen. This work was partly supported by a Grant (01GI0925) from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD).
Data availability
The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-95750-9.
References
- 1.Kelley DE, Goodpaster B, Wing RR, Simoneau J-A. Skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism in association with insulin resistance, obesity, and weight loss. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999;277:E1130–E1141. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.277.6.E1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mandarino LJ, Consoli A, Jain A, Kelley DE. Interaction of carbohydrate and fat fuels in human skeletal muscle: Impact of obesity and NIDDM. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996;270:E463–E470. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.3.E463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stanley WC, Recchia FA, Lopaschuk GD. Myocardial substrate metabolism in the normal and failing heart. Physiol. Rev. 2005;85:1093–1129. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonora M, et al. ATP synthesis and storage. Purinergic Signal. 2012;8:343–357. doi: 10.1007/s11302-012-9305-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ferrannini E. The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: A review. Metabolism. 1988;37:287–301. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zurlo F, et al. Low ratio of fat to carbohydrate oxidation as predictor of weight gain: Study of 24-h RQ. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990;259:E650–E657. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.259.5.E650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seidell JC, Muller DC, Sorkin JD, Andres R. Fasting respiratory exchange ratio and resting metabolic rate as predictors of weight gain: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1992;16:667–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ravussin E, Swinburn BA. Metabolic predictors of obesity: Cross-sectional versus longitudinal data. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1993;17(Suppl 3):S28–S31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marra M, Scalfi L, Contaldo F, Pasanisi F. Fasting respiratory quotient as a predictor of long-term weight changes in non-obese women. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2004;48:189–192. doi: 10.1159/000079556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pujia A, et al. Individuals with metabolically healthy overweight/obesity have higher fat utilization than metabolically unhealthy individuals. Nutrients. 2016;8:2. doi: 10.3390/nu8010002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Croci I, et al. Whole-body substrate metabolism is associated with disease severity in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2013;62:1625–1633. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ferro Y, et al. Fat utilization and arterial hypertension in overweight/obese subjects. J. Transl. Med. 2013;11:159. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Montalcini T, et al. Metabolic fuel utilization and subclinical atherosclerosis in overweight/obese subjects. Endocrine. 2013;44:380–385. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9845-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kelley DE, Mandarino LJ. Fuel selection in human skeletal muscle in insulin resistance: A reexamination. Diabetes. 2000;49:677–683. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.5.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goodpaster BH, Sparks LM. Metabolic flexibility in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kelley DE, Simoneau JA. Impaired free fatty acid utilization by skeletal muscle in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Investig. 1994;94:2349–2356. doi: 10.1172/JCI117600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Péronnet F, Haman F. Low capacity to oxidize fat and body weight. Obes. Rev. 2019;20:1367–1383. doi: 10.1111/obr.12910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Levadoux E, et al. Reduced whole-body fat oxidation in women and in the elderly. Int. J. Obes. 2001;25:39–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Solomon TPJ, Marchetti CM, Krishnan RK, Gonzalez F, Kirwan JP. Effects of aging on basal fat oxidation in obese humans. Metabolism. 2008;57:1141–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Siervo M, et al. Age-related changes in basal substrate oxidation and visceral adiposity and their association with metabolic syndrome. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016;55:1755–1767. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0993-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petersen KF. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the elderly: Possible role in insulin resistance. Science. 2003;300:1140–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1082889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee H-Y, et al. Targeted expression of catalase to mitochondria prevents age-associated reductions in mitochondrial function and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2010;12:668–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weyer C, Snitker S, Rising R, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Determinants of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man: Effects of body composition, age, sex, ethnicity and glucose tolerance in 916 subjects. Int. J. Obes. 1999;23:715–722. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leverve X, Batandier C, Fontaine E. Choosing the right substrate. Novartis Found. Symp. 2007;280:108–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Randle PJ, Garland PB, Hales CN, Newsholme EA. The glucose fatty-acid cycle its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1963;281:785–789. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(63)91500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Galgani JE, Moro C, Ravussin E. Metabolic flexibility and insulin resistance. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;295:E1009–E1017. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90558.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schiffelers S, Saris W, van Baak M. The effect of an increased free fatty acid concentration on thermogenesis and substrate oxidation in obese and lean men. Int. J. Obes. 2001;25:33–38. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goedecke JH, et al. Determinants of the variability in respiratory exchange ratio at rest and during exercise in trained athletes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;279:E1325–E1334. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.6.E1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Toubro S, Sørensen TIA, Hindsberger C, Christensen NJ, Astrup A. Twenty-four-hour respiratory quotient: The role of diet and familial resemblance. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:2758–2764. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.8.5044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bonadonna RC, Groop LC, Zych K, Shank M, DeFronzo RA. Dose-dependent effect of insulin on plasma free fatty acid turnover and oxidation in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990;259:E736–E750. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1990.259.5.E736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hue L, Taegtmeyer H. The Randle cycle revisited: A new head for an old hat. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;297:E578–E591. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00093.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Papackova Z, Cahova M. Fatty acid signaling: The new function of intracellular lipases. IJMS. 2015;16:3831–3855. doi: 10.3390/ijms16023831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hirsch KR, Smith-Ryan AE, Blue MNM, Mock MG, Trexler ET. Influence of segmental body composition and adiposity hormones on resting metabolic rate and substrate utilization in overweight and obese adults. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2017;40:635–643. doi: 10.1007/s40618-017-0616-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fukao T, et al. Ketone body metabolism and its defects. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2014;37:541–551. doi: 10.1007/s10545-014-9704-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Møller N. Ketone body, 3-hydroxybutyrate: Minor metabolite—Major medical manifestations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:2884–2892. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim G, et al. Spontaneous ketonuria and risk of incident diabetes: A 12 year prospective study. Diabetologia. 2019;62:779–788. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4829-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raffort J, et al. Insights on glicentin, a promising peptide of the proglucagon family. Biochem. Med. 2017;27:308–324. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Holst JJ. The incretin system in healthy humans: The role of GIP and GLP-1. Metabolism. 2019;96:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Naitoh R, et al. Inhibition of GIP signaling modulates adiponectin levels under high-fat diet in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;376:21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhou H, et al. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide modulates adiposity and fat oxidation under diminished insulin action. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;335:937–942. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Galsgaard KD, Pedersen J, Knop FK, Holst JJ, Wewer Albrechtsen NJ. Glucagon receptor signaling and lipid metabolism. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:413. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schutz Y, Tremblay A, Weinsier RL, Nelson KM. Role of fat oxidation in the long-term stabilization of body weight in obese women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:670–674. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/55.3.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nagy TR, et al. Determinants of basal fat oxidation in healthy Caucasians. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996;80:1743–1748. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.5.1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Colberg SR, Simoneau JA, Thaete FL, Kelley DE. Skeletal muscle utilization of free fatty acids in women with visceral obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 1995;95:1846–1853. doi: 10.1172/JCI117864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Booth A, Magnuson A, Foster M. Detrimental and protective fat: body fat distribution and its relation to metabolic disease. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2014;17:13–27. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2014-0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shi H, Seeley RJ, Clegg DJ. Sexual differences in the control of energy homeostasis. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30:396–404. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McLaughlin T, Lamendola C, Liu A, Abbasi F. Preferential fat deposition in subcutaneous versus visceral depots is associated with insulin sensitivity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:E1756–E1760. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Knerr PJ, et al. Selection and progression of unimolecular agonists at the GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptors as drug candidates. Peptides. 2020;125:170225. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Killion EA, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor therapies for the treatment of obesity, do agonists = antagonists? Endocr. Rev. 2020;41:1–21. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnz002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: Comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1462–1470. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gastaldelli A, et al. Importance of changes in adipose tissue insulin resistance to histological response during thiazolidinedione treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2009;50:1087–1093. doi: 10.1002/hep.23116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kahn SE, et al. Quantification of the relationship between insulin sensitivity and -cell function in human subjects: Evidence for a hyperbolic function. Diabetes. 1993;42:1663–1672. doi: 10.2337/diab.42.11.1663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Alberti KGMM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:S13–S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weir JBDB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J. Physiol. (London) 1949;109:1–9. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Haugen HA, Chan L-N, Li F. Indirect calorimetry: A practical guide for clinicians. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2007;22:377–388. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022004377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Branson RD, Johannigman JA. The measurement of energy expenditure. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2004;19:622–636. doi: 10.1177/0115426504019006622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Machann J, et al. Follow-up whole-body assessment of adipose tissue compartments during a lifestyle intervention in a large cohort at increased risk for type 2 diabetes. Radiology. 2010;257:353–363. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Würslin C, et al. Topography mapping of whole body adipose tissue using a fully automated and standardized procedure. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2010;31:430–439. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.